American Proctology Before 1899, Part 2: The Rise of the Rectal Specialists.

Joseph M. Mathews' study at St. Mark's Hospital (London) in the 1877 to 1878 winter was followed shortly by a landmark move toward specialization in the United States: Mathews' heading of a Special Commission on Rectal Diseases appointed at the 23rd Annual Session of the Kentucky State Medical Society, held April 2 to 4, 1878. Various "rectal specialists," under various makeshift titles, were lecturing and publishing by the mid-1890s. The world's first proctologic journal, published between 1894 and 1898, was Mathews' Medical Quarterly, from its inception interpellating a community of colleagues.

Colorectal Surgery Surveillance: A Novel Method for Composing an Automated Real-time Prospective Registry.

BACKGROUND: Medical registries have been shown to be an effective way to improve patient care and reduce costs. Constructing such registries entails extraneous effort of either reviewing medical charts or creating tailored case report forms (CRF). While documentation has shifted from handwritten notes into electronic medical records (EMRs), the majority of information is logged as free text, which is difficult to extract. OBJECTIVES: To construct a tool within the EMR to document patient-related data as codified variables to automatically create a prospective database for all patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS: The hospital's EMR was re-designed to include codified variables within the operative report and patient notes that documented pre-operative history, operative details, postoperative complications, and pathology reports. The EMR was programmed to capture all existing data of interest with manual completion of un-coded variables. RESULTS: During a 6-month pilot study, 130 patients underwent colorectal surgery. Of these, 104 (80%) were logged into the registry on the same day of surgery. The median time to log the rest of the 26 cases was 1 day. Forty-two patients had a postoperative complication. The most common cause for severe complications was an anastomotic leak with a cumulative rate of 12.3. CONCLUSIONS: Re-designing the EMR to enable prospective documentation of surgical related data is a valid method to create an on-going, real-time database that is recorded instantaneously with minimal additional effort and minimal cost.

Colorectal surgery patient perspectives on healthcare during the CoVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: To focus on critical care needs of coronavirus patients, elective operations were postponed and selectively rescheduled. The effect of these measures on patients was unknown. We sought to understand patients' perspectives regarding surgical care during the CoVID-19 pandemic to improve future responses. METHODS: We performed qualitative interviews with patients whose operations were postponed. Interviews explored patient responses to: 1) surgery postponement; 2) experience of surgery; 3) impacts of rescheduling/postponement on emotional/physical health; 4) identifying areas of improvement. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed through an integrated approach. RESULTS: Patient perspectives fell within the following domains: 1) reactions to surgery postponement/rescheduling; 2) experience of surgery during CoVID-19 pandemic; 3) reflections on communication; 4) patient trust in surgeons and healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: We found no patient-reported barriers to rescheduling surgery. Several areas of care which could be improved (communication). There was an unexpected sense of trust in surgeons and the hospital.

Female Representation and Position Based on Facts and Members Views in the European Society of Coloproctology.

BACKGROUND: There is wide variation in gender distribution in colorectal surgery across different European countries. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate female representation, implicit bias, and members' perception on female participation and representation at the European Society of Coloproctology 2017 annual scientific meeting. DESIGN: This was a retrospective mixed-methods cross-sectional observational study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted using data from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology annual scientific meeting program and attendees. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the percentage of female speakers in the formal program and assessment for implicit bias. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of women attending the conference, the percentage of women serving on committees, and the results of the online survey. METHODS: Female representation was retrospectively quantified by role, session type, and topic. Implicit bias was measured classifying the introductions of speakers by moderators as formal (using a professional title) or informal (using name only), then further stratified by gender. An online survey was disseminated and analyzed to investigate the members' perception as a benchmark analysis. RESULTS: Disparities were found between sexes, with fewer women attending the conference (25%), serving as session chairs (8%), speakers (21%), and on committees (10%) compared with men. There were no differences across sexes regarding the formal or informal introduction. The survey among our members showed that significantly fewer women felt equally endorsed within the society compared with men (33% versus 63%; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The retrospective design with data available to be analyzed was limited by the sessions recorded (27/49) and survey respondents (28%). CONCLUSIONS: Female representation within European Society of Coloproctology as chair, speaker, attendee, and committee member was much lower than male representation, both in absolute numbers and relative to membership. Greater awareness of this disparity and inclusiveness are aims of our society. The impact of these initiatives will be determined by reevaluating these metrics at the 2020 annual meeting. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B384. REPRESENTACIN Y POSICIN FEMENINA EN LA SOCIEDAD EUROPEA DE COLOPROCTOLOGA BASADA EN LOS HECHOS Y LAS OPINIONES DE SUS MIEMBROS: ANTECEDENTES:Existe una amplia variabilidad en la distribución de géneros en la cirugía colorrectal en los diferentes países de Europa.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la representación femenina, el sesgo implícito y la percepción de los miembros sobre la participación y representación femenina en el 12° Congreso científico anual de la Sociedad Europea de Coloproctología.DESIGN:Este fué un estudio observacional retrospectivo de métodos mixtos transversales.AJUSTES:Los análisis se realizaron utilizando los datos del programa cintífico de la reunión y los datos de los presentes en el Congreso de la ESCP en 2017.MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES DE RESULTADOS:La principal medida en el resultado fue el porcentaje de disertantes femeninas en el programa definitivo y la evaluación del sesgo implícito. Los resultados secundarios fueron el porcentaje de mujeres que asistieron a la conferencia, trabajaron en los comités y los resultados de la encuesta informática.METODOS:La representación femenina se cuantificó retrospectivamente según el rol, tipo de sesión y temas. Se midió el sesgo implícito clasificando las introducciones de los disertantes por parte de los moderadores de manera formal (usando un título profesional) o informal (usando solamente el nombre), y luego fueron estratificadas por género. Se difundió y analizó una encuesta informática para investigar la percepción de los miembros como análisis de referencia.RESULTADOS:Se encontraron disparidades de género, con menos mujeres presentes en la conferencia (25%), obrando como presidentes de sesión (8%), como disertantes (21%) y como miembros de comités (10%) comparadas con los hombres. No hubo diferencia entre sexos con respecto a la introducción formal o informal. La encuesta informática entre los miembros mostró significativamente que menos mujeres se sentían respaldadas igualitariamente dentro de la sociedad comparadas con los hombres (33% frente a 63%, p<0.001).LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo de datos limitados a las sesiones grabadas (27/49) y a los encuestados (28%) disponibles para el análisis.CONCLUSIONES:La representación femenina dentro de la Sociedad Europea de Coloproctología como presidente, disertante, asistente ó como miembro del comité fué mucho menor que la representación masculina, tanto en números absolutos como en relación con la membresía. Crear una mayor conciencia de esta disparidad de inclusión son prioridad en nuestra sociedad. El impacto de estas iniciativas se determinará re-evaluando estas variables en reuniones futuras. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B384.

A worldwide survey on proctological practice during COVID-19 lockdown (ProctoLock 2020): a cross-sectional analysis.

AIM: Proctology is one of the surgical specialties that has suffered the most during COVID-19 pandemic. Using a cross-sectional non-incentivised World Wide Web survey, we aimed to snapshot the current status of proctological practice in six world regions. METHOD: Surgeons affiliated to renowned scientific societies with an interest in coloproctology were invited to join the survey. Members of the ProctoLock Working Group enhanced recruitment by direct invitation. The predictive power of respondents' and hospitals' demographics on the change of status of surgical and outpatient activities was calculated. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 1050) were mostly men (79%), with a mean age of 46.9 years, at consultant level (79%), practising in academic hospitals (53%) offering a dedicated proctology service (68%). A total of 119 (11%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The majority (54%) came from Europe. Participants from Asia reported a higher proportion of unaltered practice (17%), while those from Europe had the highest proportion of fully stopped practice (20%). The likelihood of ongoing surgical practice was higher in men (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.13-2.09; P = 0.006), in those reporting readily availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) (OR 1.40, 1.08-1.42; P = 0.012) and in centres that were partially or not at all involved in COVID-19 care (OR 2.95, 2.14-4.09; P < 0.001). This chance decreased by 2% per year of respondent's age (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Several factors including different screening policies and resource capacity affected the current status of proctological practice. This information may help health authorities to formulate effective preventive strategies to limit curtailment of care of these patients during the pandemic.

DElayed COloRectal cancer care during COVID-19 Pandemic (DECOR-19): Global perspective from an international survey.

BACKGROUND: The widespread nature of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been unprecedented. We sought to analyze its global impact with a survey on colorectal cancer care during the pandemic. METHODS: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on preoperative assessment, elective surgery, and postoperative management of colorectal cancer patients was explored by a 35-item survey, which was distributed worldwide to members of surgical societies with an interest in colorectal cancer care. Respondents were divided into 2 comparator groups: (1) "delay" group: colorectal cancer care affected by the pandemic and (2) "no delay" group: unaltered colorectal cancer practice. RESULTS: A total of 1,051 respondents from 84 countries completed the survey. No substantial differences in demographics were found between the delay (745, 70.9%) and no delay (306, 29.1%) groups. Suspension of multidisciplinary team meetings, staff members quarantined or relocated to coronavirus disease 2019 units, units fully dedicated to coronavirus disease 2019 care, and personal protective equipment not readily available were factors significantly associated to delays in endoscopy, radiology, surgery, histopathology, and prolonged chemoradiation therapy-to-surgery intervals. In the delay group, 48.9% of respondents reported a change in the initial surgical plan, and 26.3% reported a shift from elective to urgent operations. Recovery of colorectal cancer care was associated with the status of the outbreak. Practicing in coronavirus disease-free units, no change in operative slots and staff members not relocated to coronavirus disease 2019 units were statistically associated with unaltered colorectal cancer care in the no delay group, while the geographic distribution was not. CONCLUSION: Global changes in diagnostic and therapeutic colorectal cancer practices were evident. Changes were associated with differences in health care delivery systems, hospital's preparedness, resource availability, and local coronavirus disease 2019 prevalence rather than geographic factors. Strategic planning is required to optimize colorectal cancer care.

Creating a collaborative program for the care of children with colorectal and pelvic problems.

The treatment of patients with colorectal disorders and their associated urologic, gynecologic, gastrointestinal, spinal, and orthopedic anomalies requires care from various medical and surgical specialties over the course of their lifetime. This is ideally handled by a collaborative center which facilitates the assessment and development of a long-term patient care plan among multiple specialties which can enhance the quality of care, improve communication among different specialties, and improve patient satisfaction and outcomes. We describe the process, as well as lessons learned in developing such a center.

The COVID-19 pandemic: considerations for resuming normal colorectal services.

This European Society of Coloproctology guidance focuses on a proposed conceptual framework to resume standard service in colorectal surgery. The proposed conceptual framework is a schematic and stepwise approach including: in-depth assessment of damage to non-COVID-19-related colorectal service; the return of service (integration with the COVID-19-specific service and the existing operational continuity planning); safety arrangements in parallel with minimizing downtime; the required support for staff and patients; the aftermath of the pandemic and continued strategic planning. This will be dynamic guidance with ongoing updates using critical appraisal of emerging evidence. We will welcome input from all stakeholders (statutory organizations, healthcare professionals, public and patients). Any new questions, new data and discussion are welcome via https://www.escp.eu.com/guidelines.

A narrative celebrating the recent contributions of women to colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: To interview extraordinary women who have made recent significant contributions to the field of colorectal surgery. DESIGN: The authors asked some of the many extraordinary women who have made significant contributions to the field of colorectal surgery to answer several questions. These women were selected from many potential candidates based upon their extraordinary recent contributions to the field of colorectal surgery. These thought leaders were asked about their contributions to colorectal surgery, their mentors, whether they had any women as role models, and, lastly, what they would tell their younger selves. The study was structured to recognize these women for their remarkable recent contributions to colorectal surgery, and we wished to encourage women to pursue leadership in colorectal surgery including the allied fields of colorectal pathology and colorectal imaging. Furthermore, the authors hoped to inspire male colorectal surgeons to actively mentor and help the career development of women colorectal surgeons. The potential limitations of the study include the fact that there are many more well-deserving women who could have been included in the sample survey but, because of space constraints, were not invited. CONCLUSION: Women in colorectal surgery and in the allied specialties of colorectal pathology and colorectal radiology have made many recent major significant contributions to colorectal surgery. The expectation is that the volume and frequency of such contributions as well as the number of women making these contributions should further significantly increase with time.

Italian multi-society modified Delphi consensus on the definition and management of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of anastomotic leak (AL) has not decreased over the past decades and some important grey areas remain in its definition, prevention, and management. The aim of this study was to reach a national consensus on the definition of AL and to identify key points to be applied in clinical practice. METHODS: A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Ten representative members of the major Italian surgical scientific societies with proven colorectal expertise were selected after a call to action. After a comprehensive literature search, each expert drew a list of evidence-based statements which were voted in round one by the scientific board. Panel members were asked to mark "totally disagree", "partially agree" or "totally agree" for each statement and provide comments. The same voting method was used for round 2. Round 3 consisted of a final face-to-face meeting. RESULTS: Thirty-three statements (clustered into 14 topics) were included in round 1. Following the third voting round, a final list of 16 items was formulated, which encompass the following 9 topics: AL definition, patient- and operative-related risk factors, prevention measures, bowel preparation, surgical technique, intraoperative assessment, early diagnosis, radiological diagnosis and management of specific patterns of AL. The overall response rate was 100% for all items in all the three rounds. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi survey identified items that expert colorectal surgeons agreed were important to be applied in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of AL. This represents the first consensus involving all relevant national scientific societies, defining important and shared concepts in the diagnosis and management of AL.

Implementation of a clinical pathway for the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIM: This report summarizes the early experience of implementing elective colorectal cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A pathway to minimize the risk of including COVID-19-positive patients for elective surgery was established. Prioritization and additional safety measures were introduced into clinical practice. Minimal invasive surgery was used where appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were prioritized, and 23 patients underwent surgery (eight colon, 14 rectal and one anal cancer). The minimal invasive surgery rate was 78%. There were no major postoperative complications or patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Histopathological outcomes were similar to normal practice. CONCLUSION: A safe pathway to offer standard high-quality surgery to colorectal cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is feasible.

Coronavirus pandemic and colorectal surgery: practical advice based on the Italian experience.

AIM: The current COVID-19 pandemic is challenging healthcare systems at a global level. We provide a practical strategy to reorganize pathways of emergency and elective colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: The authors, all from areas affected by the COVID-19 emergency, brainstormed remotely to define the key-points to be discussed. Tasks were assigned, concerning specific aspects of colorectal surgery during the pandemic, including the administrative management of the crisis in Italy. The recommendations (based on experience and on the limited evidence available) were collated and summarized. RESULTS: Little is known about the transmission of COVID-19, but it has shown a rapid spread. It is prudent to stop non-cancer procedures and prioritize urgent cancer treatment. Endoscopy and proctological procedures should be performed highly selectively. When dealing with colorectal emergencies, a conservative approach is advised. Specific procedures should be followed when operating on COVID-19-patients, using dedicated personal protective equipment and adhering to specific rules. Some policies are described, including minimally-invasive surgery. These policies outline the strict regulation of entry/ exit into theatres and operating building as well as advice on performing procedures safely to reduce risk of spreading the virus. It is likely that a reorganization of health system is required, both at central and local levels. A description of the strategy adopted in Italy is provided. CONCLUSION: Evidence on the management of patients needing surgery for colorectal conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic is currently lacking. Lessons learnt from healthcare professionals that have managed high volumes of surgical patients during the pandemic could be useful to mitigate some risks and reduce exposure to other patients, public and healthcare staff.

The effect of multidisciplinary colorectal center development on short-term hospital readmissions for patients with anorectal malformations or Hirschsprung disease.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital readmissions have become a quality metric for both hospital systems and individual surgeons. The medical literature is replete with studies describing readmission rates and factors contributing to readmissions following surgical procedures. Relatively little, however, has been done to define potential solutions to these problems. Over the past decade there has been a movement toward the development of multidisciplinary colorectal centers at high volume children's hospitals. We hypothesized that the development of a colorectal center at our children's hospital decreased readmissions in our colorectal surgery population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed including all patients with the diagnosis of anorectal malformation (ARM) or Hirschsprung disease (HD) at our institution between the years of 2005-2017. Patient level outcomes were compared between the cohort treated prior to (2005-2010) and the cohort treated after the development of the colorectal center (2012-2017). RESULTS: A total of 354 patients were identified. One hundred seventy-eight patients (113 ARM, 65 HD) were treated prior to and 176 patients (110 ARM, 66 HD) were treated after the development of the colorectal center. Forty-five (25.3%) patients underwent neonatal repair prior to development of the center compared to 15 (8.5%) after. 111 (62.4%) patients underwent colostomy prior to the colorectal center comparted to 95 (54%) after. The rate of readmission within 120 days of discharge in the early group was 63% compared to 52% in those managed in the multidisciplinary colorectal center (p = 0.04). Conversely, the rate of emergency room visits increased from 8.4% to 27.3% (p = 0.01). The decrease in readmission rates was more pronounced in the ARM group, while the HD cohort had similar readmission rates before and after the establishment of the center. Multivariate logistic regression revealed an odds ratio of 0.59 (95% CI 0.37-0.92) for readmission following the development of the multidisciplinary colorectal center. DISCUSSION: The development of a multidisciplinary colorectal center at our institution was associated with decreased hospital readmissions, but an increase in emergency department resource utilization. These findings suggest improved efficiency in patient care with the implementation of a multispecialty, patient centered approach while also identifying areas of focus for future quality improvement initiatives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.