Expanded colesevelam administration options with oral suspension formulation for patients with diabetes and hypercholesterolemia.

INTRODUCTION: Colesevelam HCl (colesevelam) is a bile acid sequestrant initially approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000 as an adjunct to diet and exercise to lower elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in adults with primary lipidemia, as monotherapy, or in combination with a statin. More recently, the drug was approved for use in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to improve glycemic control. Thus, colesevelam is currently the only single-agent monotherapy approved by the FDA to lower both LDL-C and glycated hemoglobin (A1c) levels in adults with T2DM and elevated LDL-C. Moreover, the formulation options for colesevelam have also expanded since its original approval. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Medline search was conducted to provide evidence to support the efficacy and safety for the use of colesevelam tablets or oral suspension preparations when treating patients with lipidemia, T2DM, or both. No limitations were placed on publication date or any other parameter. RESULTS: Clinical studies have shown that colesevelam is efficacious in lowering LDL-C levels, improving the lipid profile, and improving glycemic control by reducing both A1c and fasting plasma glucose levels in T2DM. Equilibrium and kinetics data show that colesevelam is equivalent in its tablet and oral suspension formulation. CONCLUSION: Having 2 effective oral routes enhances convenience and improves compliance, both of which contribute to maximal therapeutic outcomes. These compliance benefits are due to the ease and flexibility of preparing the powder in various beverages and the pleasant taste from the inclusion of a low-calorie citrus flavoring.

Colesevelam and colestipol: novel medication resins in the gastrointestinal tract.

We report the morphologic description of the bile acid sequestrants (BAS) colesevelam and colestipol, as well as the largest series of cholestyramine. Histologically similar medication resins from 4 institutions were prospectively collected over 1 year (26 specimens, 15 patients). Comorbidities included hyperlipidemia (4/15), hypertension (4/15), inflammatory bowel disease (4/15), coronary artery disease (3/15), diarrhea (7/15), hypothyroidism (2/15), and ischemic bowel (1/15). Sites of involvement included the esophagus (1/26), stomach (1/26), small intestine (1/26), ileocecal valve (1/26), and colorectum (22/26). Associated histologic diagnoses included normal (8/26), chronic mucosal injury (11/26), acute inflammation (9/26), erosion/ulceration (6/26), and cytomegalovirus (2/26). The BAS resins were histologically indistinguishable from each other; they were all eosinophilic on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and lacked internal "fish-scales." To validate these observations, respective medications were submitted for histologic processing; the processed medications were identical to those in the patient specimens. Rare, irregular "fracture" lines presented diagnostic pitfalls by mimicking the true "fish-scales" of Kayexalate and sevelamer. Clues to the correct identification of BAS include recognition that the "fracture" lines were subtle, irregular, and restricted to large fragments or thick sections, likely representing a processing artifact. Moreover, Kayexalate is violet on H&E and black on acid fast bacillus, and sevelamer characteristically displays a 2-tone color on H&E and is magenta on acid fast bacillus. An association with inflammatory injury was seen (15/26). We believe that the BAS are innocent bystanders in complicated patients, although we cannot exclude their ability to cause mucosal injury in specific settings.

Colesevelam hydrochloride: efficacy and safety in pediatric subjects with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of colesevelam hydrochloride in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH). STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, 41-site study in 194 children aged 10 to 17 years (inclusive) with heFH (statin-naïve or on a stable statin regimen). After a 4-week stabilization period (period I), subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, colesevelam 1.875 g/d, or colesevelam 3.75 g/d for 8 weeks (period II). All then received open-label colesevelam 3.75 g/d for 18 weeks (period III), with follow-up 2 weeks later. The primary endpoint was percent change in low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol from baseline to week 8. Secondary endpoints included percent change in other lipoprotein variables, including non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL)-cholesterol. Adverse events were also evaluated. RESULTS: At week 8, a significant difference from baseline in LDL-cholesterol was reported with colesevelam 1.875 g/d (-6.3%; P = .031) and colesevelam 3.75 g/d (-12.5%; P < .001) compared with placebo. Significant treatment effects were also reported for total cholesterol (-7.4%), non-HDL-cholesterol (-10.9%), HDL-cholesterol (+6.1%), apolipoprotein A-I (+6.9%), and apolipoprotein B (-8.3%) and a nonsignificant effect for triglycerides (+5.1%) with colesevelam 3.75 g/d compared with placebo at week 8. These treatment effects were maintained during period III. CONCLUSIONS: Colesevelam significantly lowered LDL-cholesterol levels in children with heFH.

Efficacy and safety of colesevelam in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycemic control receiving insulin-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: Poor glycemic control is a risk factor for microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Achieving glycemic control safely with insulin therapy can be challenging. METHODS: A prospective, 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study conducted at 50 sites in the United States and 1 site in Mexico between August 12, 2004, and December 28, 2005. Subjects had type 2 diabetes mellitus that was not adequately controlled (glycated hemoglobin level, 7.5%-9.5%, inclusive) receiving insulin therapy alone or in combination with oral antidiabetes agents. In total 287 subjects (52% men; mean age, 57 years; with a mean baseline glycated hemoglobin level of 8.3%) were randomized: 147 to receive colesevelam hydrochloride, 3.75 g/d, and 140 to receive placebo. RESULTS: Using the least squares method, the mean (SE) change in glycated hemoglobin level from baseline to week 16 was -0.41% (0.07%) for the colesevelam-treated group and 0.09% (0.07%) for the placebo group (treatment difference, -0.50% [0.09%]; 95% confidence interval, -0.68% to -0.32%; P < .001). Consistent reductions in fasting plasma glucose and fructosamine levels, glycemic-control response rate, and lipid control measures were observed with colesevelam. As expected, the colesevelam-treated group had a 12.8% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration relative to placebo (P < .001). Of recipients of colesevelam and placebo, respectively, 30 and 26 discontinued the study prematurely; 7 and 9 withdrew because of protocol-specified hyperglycemia, and 10 and 4 withdrew because of adverse events. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Colesevelam treatment seems to be safe and effective for improving glycemic control and lipid management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin-based therapy, and it may provide a novel treatment for improving dual cardiovascular risk factors.