In Vitro and In Vivo Rat Model Assessments of the Effects of Vonoprazan on the Pharmacokinetics of Venlafaxine.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of vonoprazan on the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: The mechanism underlying the inhibitory effect of vonoprazan on venlafaxine was investigated using rat liver microsomes. In vitro, the inhibition was evaluated by determining the production of O-desmethylvenlafaxine. Eighteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups: control group, vonoprazan (5 mg/kg) group, and vonoprazan (20 mg/kg) group. A single dose of 20 mg/kg venlafaxine was administrated to rats orally without or with vonoprazan. Plasma was prepared from blood samples collected via the tail vein at different time points and concentrations of venlafaxine and its metabolite, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: We observed that vonoprazan could significantly decrease the amount of O-desmethylvenlafaxine (IC50 = 5.544 µM). Vonoprazan inhibited the metabolism of venlafaxine by a mixed inhibition, combining competitive and non-competitive inhibitory mechanisms. Compared with that in the control group (without vonoprazan), the pharmacokinetic parameters of venlafaxine and its metabolite, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, were significantly increased in both 5 and 20 mg/kg vonoprazan groups, with an increase in MRO-desmethylvenlafaxine. CONCLUSION: Vonoprazan significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine in vitro and in vivo. Further investigations should be conducted to check these effects in humans. Therapeutic drug monitoring of venlafaxine in individuals undergoing venlafaxine maintenance therapy is recommended when vonoprazan is used concomitantly.

Inhibitory Effect of Apigenin on Pharmacokinetics of Venlafaxine in vivo and in vitro.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate the effects of orally administered apigenin on the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine (VEN) in rats and on the metabolism of VEN in human and rat liver microsomes in vitro. METHODS: Ten healthy male SD rats were randomly divided into 2 groups: A group (control group), B group (a single dose of 250 mg/kg apigenin). A single dose of 20 mg/kg VEN was administered orally 30 min after administration of apigenin (250 mg/kg). VEN plasma levels were measured by HPLC with fluorescence detection, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by DAS 3.0 software. RESULTS: The single dose of 250 mg/kg apigenin significantly increased the AUC0-t of VEN by 40.9% (p < 0.05) and obviously increased the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of VEN (p < 0.05). Furthermore, apigenin showed inhibitory effect on human and rat microsomes and the IC50 of apigenin was 58.37 and 25.73 µmol/l, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that an intake of apigenin could increase VEN plasma levels and some of its pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, Tmax). Thus, more attention should be paid when VEN was administrated combined with apigenin.

Mechanisms of morphine-venlafaxine interactions in diabetic neuropathic pain model.

BACKGROUND: we investigated the possible mechanisms involved in the interactions of venlafaxine (VFX), a selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, and morphine (MRF), an opioid receptor agonist, after acute and chronic VFX treatment in diabetic neuropathic pain model (DNPM). METHODS: The studies were performed on male rats. The changes in nociceptive thresholds were determined by using mechanical stimuli (the Randall-Selitto and the von Frey tests). Diabetes was induced by intramuscular administration of streptozotocin. In order to investigate the mechanism of interaction, animals were also pretreated with naloxone (NLX), a nonselective opioid antagonist, yohimbine (YOH), a nonselective α2-adrenergic antagonist, and p-chloroamphetamine (PCA), a neurotoxin that destroys serotonergic neurons. The µ-opioid receptors' density was determined with the use of radioligand binding assay. RESULTS: VFX potentiated antinociceptive action of MRF after acute administration of VFX and this effect was decreased by pretreatment of NLX, YOH and PCA. On the contrary, VFX administered for 21 days prior to MRF significantly decreased the analgesic action of MRF; this effect was augmented only after YOH pretreatment. Also, 21-days administration of VFX caused decreasing tendency in the number of µ-opioid receptors in the brain stem. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that single administration of VFX potentiates antinociceptive action of morphine in DNPM. This effect is probably mediated by both, noradrenergic and serotonergic systems. On the other hand, 21-days administration of VFX significantly decreases analgesic action of MRF. Moreover, there is a possibility that VFX acts as an antagonist of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors.