Expresión de la incertidumbre en pacientes quirúrgicos por extracción de un órgano: un estudio transversal / Uncertainty expression in surgical patients of organ removal: a cross-sectional study

Introducción: El tratamiento quirúrgico de la extirpación de órganos parece satisfacer una serie depatologías que surgen como necesidades de salud de las poblaciones. En este contexto, se instala elestado de incertidumbre.Objetivo: Investigar la incertidumbre de la extracción de un órgano en pacientes quirúrgicos.Método: Estudio transversal realizado con pacientes hospitalizados en la clínica quirúrgica de unhospital universitario. Variables sociodemográficas y clínicas fueron recogidas, además, se aplicó laescala de incertidumbre en la enfermedad de Mishel.Resultados: El perfil de diagnósticos médicos en los 60 participantes mostró que las enfermedadesmás frecuentes fueron las neoplasias. Con relación a la aplicación de la escala, el 68% de losparticipantes presentaron puntuaciones mayores o iguales a 80 puntos. El valor hallado para el alfa deCronbach fue de 0,842. Los procedimientos quirúrgicos histerectomía abdominal y mastectomía, quefueron los más frecuentes para los participantes, están asociados con áreas de incertidumbre.Conclusiones: Los altos niveles de incertidumbre demostraron la necesidad de la gestión de estacondición. Los aspectos psicosociales de los tratamientos quirúrgicos son desconsiderados a expensasde la restauración clínica, circunstancias en que se descuida el sufrimiento emocional del paciente. Lamejora de la comunicación entre los profesionales de la salud y el paciente puede influir para prevenirla manifestación de la falta de información, una de las formas de la expresión de la incertidumbre.Aspectos como el perfil socioeconómico del paciente, el nivel educativo y los ingresos deben tenerseen cuenta en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la extracción de órganos. La incertidumbre experimentada porestos pacientes debe conocerse mejor y difundirse ampliamente para que estos aspectos se destaquenen el entorno de la atención médica (AU)

Introduction: The surgical treatment of organ removal seems to meet a number of pathologies thatemerge as health needs of populations. In this context, the state of uncertainty is installed.Objective: To investigate the uncertainty in illness in surgical patients of organ removal.Method: Cross-sectional study developed with patients admitted to the surgical outpatient clinic of auniversity hospital. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected, in addition to applyingMishel uncertainty in illness scale.Results: The profile of medical diagnoses in the 60 participants showed that the most frequentdiseases were the neoplasms. As for the scale application, 68% of the participants presented scoresgreater than or equal to 80 points. The value found for the Cronbach’s Alpha was 0.842. The surgicalprocedures abdominal hysterectomy and mastectomy, which were the most prevalent for theparticipants, are associated with uncertainty domains.Conclusions: High levels of uncertainty demonstrated the need for the management of this condition.The psychosocial aspects of surgical treatments are disregarded at the expense of the clinicalrestoration, circumstances that neglect the patient’s emotional suffering. The improvement ofcommunication between the health professional and the patient can influence to prevent themanifestation of the lack of information, one of the forms of expressing uncertainty. Aspects such as thepatient’s socioeconomic profile, educational level and income must be taken into account in the surgicaltreatment of organ removal. The uncertainty experienced by these patients needs to be better knownand widely disseminated to gain prominence in the health care setting (AU)

Evidence of Resilience in Kidney Donors: A New York Statewide Cohort Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Donor nephrectomy (DN) is a procedure performed to provide recipients with a kidney to treat end-stage renal disease. The following analysis evaluated depression diagnosis in DN patients compared to controls. METHODS: DN patients and matched controls were identified between 2000 and 2009 from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Cohorts were tracked for depression incidence. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of a postoperative depression diagnosis. RESULTS: The total study cohort included 2108 DN cases and 2108 controls. In both donors and controls, the baseline rate of depression was 0.95% (n = 20). The 5-year incidence of depression diagnosis after exposure increased in both cohorts (donors: 2.5%, n = 53; controls: 7.2%, n = 152; P < .001). The 5-year relative risk for developing depression was 2.65 (CI 1.59-4.42, P = .0002) in donors and 7.60 (CI 4.79-12.07, P < .001) in controls. On multivariable regression, being a donor was associated with reduced risk of developing postoperative depression (OR = 0.322, CI 0.233-0.445, P < .001), and the greatest risk factor for postoperative depression was a prior depressive diagnosis (OR = 7.811, CI 3.814-15.997, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that the strongest risk factor for depression was a prior diagnosis of depression. However, willingness to undergo donor nephrectomy is associated with less subsequent depression than the control population, suggesting that kidney donors may be a more resilient cohort.

Interactive Virtual Reality Renal Models as an Educational and Preoperative Planning Tool for Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of interactive virtual reality (iVR) in providing a three-dimensional (3D) experience with the donor's anatomy for surgeons and patients, we present a retrospective, case-controlled study assessing the impact of iVR renal models prior to LDN on both surgical outcomes and patients' understanding of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing LDN were prospectively recruited; their contrast-enhanced CT scans were transformed into iVR models. An iVR platform allowed the surgeons to rotate and deconstruct the renal anatomy; patients could also view their anatomy as the procedure was explained to them. Questionnaires assessed surgeons' understanding of renal anatomy after CT alone and after CT+iVR. Surgeons also commented on whether iVR impacted their preoperative plan. Patients assessed their anatomical understanding and anxiety level before and after iVR. Surgical outcomes for the iVR cohort were compared to a retrospectively matched, non-iVR cohort of LDN patients. RESULTS: Surgeons altered their preoperative plan in 18 of 20 LDNs after viewing iVR models. Patients reported better understanding of their anatomy (5/5) and noted decreased preoperative anxiety (5/5) after viewing iVR. When compared to the non-iVR group, the iVR group had a 25% reduction in median operative time (P < .001). In terms of surgical outcomes, patients in the iVR group had a 40% lower median relative change in postoperative creatinine (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative viewing of iVR models altered the operative approach, decreased the operative time, and improved donor patient outcomes. iVR models also reduced patients' preoperative anxiety.

Is Cholecystectomy Really Harmful? A Long-Term Quality of Life Study in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an accepted option for patients with end-stage liver disease. However, it potentially carries the risk of donor morbi-mortality, as well as long-term functional impairment. Cholecystectomy is performed routinely in the donor intervention, but the long-term effect on gastrointestinal (GI)-related quality of life (QoL) has never been explored previously. This study evaluated living donors' overall, abdominal wall-related, activity-level, and GI-related QoL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 21 living liver donors (LLD) (57% women, mean age 45 ± 9 years) were compared to a control group (29 patients) undergoing cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps (45% women, mean age of 46 ± 7 years). LLD and controls (Ctl) were divided into 2 age groups: LLD-Y and Ctl-Y (25-45 years); and LLD-O and Ctl-O (46-65 years). Generic SF-36, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, EuraHS for abdominal wall status assessment, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire were performed. Standard age-adjusted Portuguese population SF-36 scores were used. RESULTS: Global QoL results were better than Portuguese population scores and not inferior when compared to controls, scoring higher in the LLD-Y group in domains as vitality and mental health (P < .05). The abdominal wall impact was minimal among LLD. The activity level was significantly higher in LLD-Y than in Ctl-Y. Overall GI-related QoL was very close to the maximum score, and GI symptoms were significantly less in LLD-O compared with Ctl-O. CONCLUSION: LDLT had no impact on donors' general, abdominal wall-related QoL or activity level. The performance of cholecystectomy apparently had no impact on the development of GI-related symptoms.

Attitude of Older People Toward Living Donation.

BACKGROUND: Living donation is a potential source of organs that could help to reduce the organ transplant deficit. Given that we have a worldwide aging population, it is important to assess the opinion of older people toward this type of donation. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the attitude of people aged > 65 years toward living kidney donation (LKD) and living liver donation (LLD) and to investigate the variables affecting their attitudes. METHODS: A multicentric study was carried out using a representative sample of people > 65 years stratified by sex and geographic location in southeastern Spain (n = 420). The measurement instrument was a validated questionnaire about LKD and LLD. Statistics were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, United States) software. Descriptive analysis was carried out using Student t test, χ2 test, and a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The questionnaire completion rate was 84% (n = 351) with 88% (n = 310) in favor of LKD, and 89% (n = 311) in favor of LLD. Favorable attitude decreased to 3% when the donation under consideration was unrelated. Attitudes toward LKD and LLD were associated with having received information from the television (P = .016 and P = .045) and from friends (P = .017 and P = .03); accepting an autopsy after death (P = .001 and P = .002); and not being worried about scars (P = .015 and P = .044). In the multivariate analysis, the following variables continued to be significant: having received information from the television (odds ratio [OR], 2) and from friends (OR, 10.3); and the acceptance of an autopsy (OR, 2). CONCLUSIONS: Older people are in favor of both LKD and LLD, assuming it is a related donation. In addition, the information the elderly population receives regarding organ donation and transplantation affects their attitudes.

Factors Related to the Attitude Toward Living Kidney Donation of the Population of Havana.

INTRODUCTION: Living kidney donation (LKD) is one of the most used alternatives in the field of organ transplantation. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the attitude toward LKD among the population of Havana, Cuba. METHODS: Population under study. Population resident in Havana, Cuba. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Sample of population over 15 years stratified by age and sex. INSTRUMENT: Validated questionnaire of attitude toward donation and transplant "PCID-DVR-Ríos," self-administered and anonymously filled out. STATISTICS: χ2, Student t test, and a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 920 respondents have been included in the study. A total of 85.5% (n = 787) are in favor of the related LKD. In our study, 26.5% (n = 244) would remain in favor of unrelated LKD. Regarding the related LKD, the following variables remain independent in the multivariate analysis: 1. having studies (odds ratio [OR] = 3.649; P = .018); 2. attitude toward cadaveric organ donation (OR = 8.547; P < .001); 3. religion (OR = 4.385; P = .001); 4. opinion of the couple (OR = 4.672; P = .028); and 5. risk with living donation (OR = 10.989; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The population of Havana has a very favorable attitude toward related LKD. Only a quarter of respondents are in favor of unrelated LKD.

Kidney Donation Withdrawal and Related Factors Among the Potential Donors of Living Kidney Transplant.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to discuss the reasons for kidney donation withdrawal and related factors among the potential donors of living kidney transplant. METHODS: This study was conducted in outpatient departments with purposive sampling. Potential donors received relevant examinations and completed questionnaires when they would donate their kidneys for living related kidney transplant. Researchers tracked the final decision of potential donors. The structured questionnaire included basic data, psychosocial adjustment to illness scale, and decisional conflict scale. RESULTS: A total of 53 potential donors participated in this study, 46 of whom completed the kidney donation surgery (86.6%). The factors related to the final decision of kidney donation or kidney donation withdrawal included self-ranking health condition, value clarity, feeling supported in decision making, and overall decisional conflict. CONCLUSION: Organ transplant teams should conduct a complete physical and psychological assessment of potential donors, provide information and support, and assist potential donors to clarify their true values and willingness to undergo kidney donation. Thus, each potential donor can decide to donate in true accordance with their willingness.

Mental Distress Symptoms and Life Satisfaction Among Living Kidney Donors: Frequency and Association With Subjective Evaluations.

The aims of this study were to (1) determine psychological states and wellbeing of living kidney donors and (2) assess their interaction and association with subjective evaluations of donors. This retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted with 208 living kidney donors (123 women; 59.1%), aged between 22 and 79 years (48.74 ± 11.78) who underwent a nephrectomy between 2006 and 2017. All donors were evaluated face-to-face. The sociodemographic data collection form, a 4-question survey developed by researchers for subjective evaluations, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Contentment with Life Assessment Scale (CLAS) were administered. Only few donors, 3.8% and 7.2% respectively, were above the clinical cut off scores of the BDI and BAI. This was equivalent to the normal population. Eighty percent of respondents were satisfied with life. Only 5 donors (2.4%) claimed to have any regrets about their experience and scored higher for depression and lower for life satisfaction (P < .001). Similarly, 33 (15.9%) donors having thoughts of getting ill easily after the operation were found to be more depressive and anxious, with lower life satisfaction (P < .001). In most cases their relationship to the recipient was reported not to be changed (64.4%) or even improved (32.5%), and that was found to be related to lower depression scores (P < .001). Respondents within the first year of donation reported higher depression (P = .019) and lower life satisfaction (P = .001) scores. Finally, postoperative complications were found to increase anxiety and lower life satisfaction (P = .018, P = .026). Degree of affinity between donors and recipients showed no difference in postoperative psychological outcomes and life satisfaction. These results suggest that overall, living kidney donation does not have a negative impact on donors' life satisfaction and mental status in the long term. However, the results of the unvalidated additional survey questions underlined the importance of follow-up of donors, especially in the first year, and screening of donors' subjective experiences in gaining additional insight about donors' mental well-being.

Cases of Brain Death and Organ Donation Rates in Eskisehir.

Brain death is defined as the irreversible loss of brain and brainstem functions, making organ harvesting legally possible. We have aimed to determine the current donation and harvesting rates in Eskisehir, Turkey to achieve further donation rates by improving the conditions. We have analyzed the data of brain death cases from Eskisehir Osmangazi University Hospital and 2 state hospitals based on a time interval between 2013 and 2017. The evaluation of 113 cases of brain death revealed that organ harvesting could be performed in 25.7% of those cases, whereas organ donation was not approved in 74.3% of those deceased patients due to refusal of the legally responsible relatives. The results of a study carried out in Bursa as the first-ranked province in the Organ Donation List of Turkey in 2012 suggested that relatives permitted organ donation in only 34.6% of 79 brain death cases between 2007 and 2014, whereas that rate was 8.8% of 4.9 cadaver donations per million persons in Bursa, Turkey. A comparison between the results of Eskisehir and a neighboring province showed that lower rates of organ donation in Eskisehir may be caused by absence of a transplantation center in the province, therefore, putting the transplantation center of the university hospital into service will accelerate the rates of organ donation in Eskisehir.

Patient Perspectives on Weight Management for Living Kidney Donation.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney donors (LKDs) with obesity have increased perioperative risks and risk of end-stage renal disease after donation. Consequently, obesity serves as a barrier to donation, as many transplant centers encourage or require weight loss before donation for obese LKD candidates. Therefore, this study sought to assess patients' perspectives on weight management strategies before donation among obese LKD candidates. We hypothesized that willingness to participate in a weight loss program may be associated with donor-recipient relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) LKD candidates evaluated at a single institution from September 2017 to August 2018 were recruited. A survey was administered to assess LKD candidates' baseline exercise and dietary habits and their interest in weight management strategies for the purpose of donation approval. Participants were grouped by relationship to the recipient (close relatives: first-degree relatives or spouses [n = 29], compared with all other relationships [n = 21]). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. RESULTS: 50 of 51 obese LKD candidates who were approached completed the survey. 90% of participants expressed willingness to lose weight if necessary to become eligible for donor nephrectomy. Compared with all other LKD candidates, close relatives were more likely to be interested in combined diet and exercise programs at our institution (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among obese LKD candidates, there was an interest in weight loss for the purposes of living kidney donation approval, particularly among close relatives of potential recipients. Future programs designed to promote weight management efforts for obese LKD candidates should be considered.

Key experiences of primary social groups in Unspecified Kidney Donation.

BACKGROUND: The role of family members in directed kidney donation is well documented in the literature from both a physiological and psychosocial perspective. The experiences of families, or primary social groups (PSGs), where one member considers donating a kidney via unspecified altruistic kidney donation route (UKD) is poorly understood. This is pertinent as lack of family support has been identified as a potential contributor to donation withdrawal. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the relevant psychosocial factors underpinning completed and uncompleted donations. DESIGN: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative interviews were conducted in the United Kingdom with 35 individuals comprising of: 11 donors who donated their kidney altruistically and 8 of their PSG members, and 11 donors who withdrew and 5 of their PSG members. APPROACH: Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Framework Analysis. RESULTS: Two major themes were identified: (1) Supportability, which contained experiences fundamental to proceeding to donate, underpinned by four subthemes Acceptability, Awareness and Information, Family Risk and Ambivalence;(2) Seeking Resolution, contained discussions of experiences following either withdrawal from or completion of the donation, and comprised two sub-themes, Unfinished Business and Resolve. CONCLUSIONS: There are key differences in the experiences between those who completed their donation and those who withdrew. It is clear from this study that UKD operates within a PSG's social framework. Clinical implications suggest interventions at the level of addressing ambivalence within the PSG and the need for promotion of better psychosocial outcomes both following completion or withdrawal from donation.

Long-term donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation in Japan.

AIMS: This study examined the long-term quality of life (QOL) of living liver donors (LLDs) in Japan using both generic and LLD-specific instruments. METHODS: The sample comprised 374 LLDs from five university hospitals in Japan who underwent surgery more than a year previously. QOL was evaluated using the Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) and LLD-QOL scale. RESULTS: SF-36 results indicated that the overall long-term QOL of LLDs was significantly better than the Japanese standard. When comparing by donor factors, LLDs whose recipients were children scored higher for "satisfaction" than those whose recipients were adults on the LLD-QOL scale. LLDs with complications had lower QOL for "scars" and "burden" on the LLD-QOL scale but no differences in SF-36 scores. LLDs with longer hospital stay had lower physical QOL on SF-36 and lower QOL for "scars" and "after-effects" on the LLD-QOL scale. LLDs whose recipients have died showed lower mental QOL on SF-36 and lower "satisfaction" and greater "lack of understanding of donor health" on the LLD-QOL scale. CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter study clarified the long-term QOL of LLDs and suggested that donors' QOL was related to the donors' and recipients' ages, donor's complications and hospital stay length, and recipient's prognosis.

[Narrative Medicine can reduce opposition to organ removal for transplantation].

In Italy in 2017 out of 2738 assessments of death, there was a 28.7% of oppositions of family members to the removal of organs post-mortem. This opposition is a serious limitation to the development of transplantation programs. There is a need to increase the number of transplants since transplantation grants the highest quality of life, a longer survival and at a lower cost for the society. We propose the use of Narrative Medicine (MN) to reduce this opposition. "Narrative Medicine - as Charon says - fortifies clinical practice with the narrative competence to recognize, absorb, metabolize, interpret, and be moved by the stories of illness". We have identified eight stories as having a particular echo: 1. That of Nicholas Green, the American child killed on the Salerno-Reggio Calabria highway and whose organs saved seven people. 2. The story of Ylenia, who learned solidarity from transplants. 3. That of Robin JA Eady, Dermatology Professor in London and the second person on dialysis from Scribner in Seattle. 4. The story of the organ donation of Liberato Venditti, a young man who loved life and climbs on a motorcycle. 5. That of the young football player Giuseppe Feola, remembered here by the Napoli player Gonzalo Higuaín. 6. The donation of the organs of Bruno Memoli, Professor of Nephrology in Naples. 7. The reflections of a heart surgeon. 8. The story written by Federico Finozzi about his own transplant. "The stories" - as Greenhalgh writes - "have an ethical dimension. The person who reads or hears such a story incurs a duty to act so. Stories are open and subversive".

Autologous Breast Reconstruction With the Latissimus Dorsi Muscle With Immediate Fat Grafting: Long-term Results and Patient Satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe a variation of the breast reconstruction technique with myocutaneous flap of the fat-grafted latissimus dorsi muscle and its outcomes and evaluation of patient satisfaction. METHOD: This prospective cohort study included 18 patients and 19 reconstructed breasts, with 1 bilateral case. There were 7 cases of late reconstruction and 11 cases of immediate reconstruction. The flap was prepared with fat at the time of surgery, which was injected before its preparation. The evaluation of the results regarding shape, volume, and symmetry was performed through a satisfaction scale completed by patients and 2 physicians from 12 to 18 months after reconstruction. RESULTS: On average, 171.31 mL of fat was injected (100-275 mL); the average time of unilateral surgery was 3 hours 42 minutes (3 hours to 4 hours 30 minutes). After a mean follow-up of 26.38 months (13-38 months), we did not observe complications of this new technique. In the evaluation performed by patients regarding the shape, volume, and symmetry, more than 80% rated the outcome as excellent and good, and the evaluations by the medical team were also satisfactory. In the comparative analysis between immediate and late reconstruction, patients who underwent immediate reconstruction were more satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: This reconstruction technique with autologous fat injection was effective, with satisfactory and long-lasting results, and without the requirement for implants to set breast shape and volume.

Beecher Dépassé: Fifty Years of Determining Death, Legally.

Five decades ago, Henry Knowles Beecher, a renowned professor of research anesthesiology, sought to solve a problem created by modern medicine. The solution proposed by Beecher and his colleagues on the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death proved very influential.1 Indeed, other contemporaneous medical developments magnified its significance yet also made the solution it offered somewhat problematic. As we mark this fiftieth anniversary, at a time when concerns about the conceptual model on which its recommendations rested are being voiced by critics from medicine as well as philosophy, it is worthwhile to view the committee's report in relation to the problem that prompted its existence as well as the one to which it was quickly applied.

A Defense of the Dead Donor Rule.

Discussion of the "dead donor rule" is challenging because it implicates views about a wide range of issues, including whether and when patients are appropriately declared dead, the validity of the doctrine of double effect, and the moral difference between or equivalence of active euthanasia and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. The DDR will be defined here as the prohibition against removal of organs necessary for the life of the patient-that is, the prohibition of intentionally ending the life of a patient through organ removal. At a minimum, it is difficult not to see the DDR as grounded in a set of laws, norms, values, and practices that are firmly entrenched and have a great deal of philosophical, religious, and legal support. Obviously, the primary argument against the DDR is that it is highly desirable that we continue to procure organs for transplantation, combined with the belief that those from whom we often and possibly typically procure organs are not "really" dead. If donors are not really dead, then we are left with a dilemma: either we abandon organ procurement, or we abandon the DDR. Such a move should be taken only if the way we currently delineate the dead (those from whom it is acceptable to remove organs) cannot be maintained or defended. I will suggest that this is not the case.

A Path Not Taken: Beecher, Brain Death, and the Aims of Medicine.

It has been fifty years since a report by an ad hoc committee of Harvard Medical School ushered in the widespread adoption of brain death as a definition of death. Yet brain death remains disputed as an acceptable definition within bioethics. The continuous debate among bioethicists has had three key recurring features: first and foremost, argument over alleged flaws in the conceptual logic and consistency of the "whole-brain" approach as a description of the meaning of death; second, efforts to fix perceived limitations of brain death-based practices to optimize transplantation, especially given that transplantation was the presumed original intended purpose of the definition; and third, a basic unease provoked by the experience of using the criteria and managing a body in this state of "irreversible coma." The third feature is the one I find the most compelling, though it is less explored, and it persists because of the failures of the prior two. Brain death remains strange-to medical personnel, families, philosophers. That is not because it hasn't yet been logically argued well enough or conceptually framed adequately, but because those things don't matter as much to resolving this strangeness as the bioethical approach to brain death over the last fifty years has assumed it does. It is necessary to look to other things that can anchor the aims of medicine in the midst of this strangeness.

Organ Donation Following Neurologic and Circulatory Determination of Death.

OBJECTIVES: To describe important considerations during the process of caring for critically ill children who may be potential organ donors and supporting the family during the death of their child. DESIGN: Literature review and expert commentary. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical literature focusing on pediatric donation, best pediatric donation practices, donor management, and factors influencing donation were reviewed. Additional pediatric data were obtained and reviewed from the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Achieving successful organ donation requires the coordinated efforts of the critical care team, organ donation organization, and transplant team to effectively manage a potential donor and recover suitable organs for transplantation. Collaboration between these teams is essential to ensure that all potential organs are recovered in optimal condition, to reduce death and morbidity in children on transplantation waiting lists as well as fulfilling the family's wishes for their dying child to become a donor. CONCLUSIONS: Organ donation is an important component of end-of-life care and can help the healing process for families and medical staff following the death of a child. The process of pediatric organ donation requires healthcare providers to actively work to preserve the option of donation before the death of the child and ensure donation occurs after consent/authorization has been obtained from the family. Medical management of the pediatric organ donor requires the expertise of a multidisciplinary medical team skilled in the unique needs of caring for children after neurologic determination of death and those who become donors following circulatory death after withdrawal of life-sustaining medical therapies.

Psychological Aspects of Living Kidney Donation in Poland: Experience of One Center.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment of end-stage renal disease. The benefits for recipients are obvious. The psychological consequences for living kidney donors in Poland are not known. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the psychological aspects of living kidney donation in Poland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 66 living donor open nephrectomies were performed in our institution between 1995 and 2005. The psychological aspects were assessed in 40 donors after nephrectomy. The study applied the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), the Situation Assessment Questionnaire, the Health Behaviors Survey, and our own questionnaire. The mean observation period was 65.6 months. RESULTS: There was a trend toward better life satisfaction in living kidney donors compared to Polish adults. Donor life satisfaction was significantly lower when the recipient was dead than when the recipient was alive. Most donors perceived the kidney donation as a challenge in cognitive judgment. The mean score of the Health Behaviors Survey was not significantly different than in the general population in Poland. The mean pain score after donation was 3.2 in a 5-item scale (1 = severe pain, 5 = mild pain). The mean time of return to work was 3.5 months. No donors regretted their decisions about kidney donation. CONCLUSION: Living kidney donation in Poland has a positive impact on donors' quality of life. Among living kidney donors, the sense of danger concerning the risk of donation depends on the degree of the relationship with the recipient.

Resilience as a Moderator of Extreme Stress Adaptation: Living Kidney Donor Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to check if a situation of extreme and traumatizing stress, such as living kidney donation, would result in changes in the quality of the donor's life: whether a posttraumatic growth should occur, and if the donor would develop a strategy to handle strong and uncommon stress, known as resilience. METHODS: The study was conducted on 23 living kidney donors aged 25 to 63, who were examined 3 days before the donation and 6 months after. The study was conducted using the following tools: self-prepared questionnaires for donors before and after donations and validated questionnaires Cognitive Emotion Regulation (PRE), Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI-R), and Resilience Scale Inventory (SPP25). RESULTS: The results of the study proved that situations of extreme stress resulted in an increase of resilience. It was found that resilience was a moderator in the adaptation to extreme stress. A number of positive changes, known as posttraumatic growth, were noted. The examined patients focused on the adaptive strategies. CONCLUSION: It may be concluded that resilience is responsible for handling situations of extreme stress. Increased ability to mobilize, stronger focus on adaptive strategies, planning, and creating perspectives are observed. An observable increase of openness for new experiences, personal competencies to handle difficulties, tolerating negative emotions, and an optimistic approach to life may be noted.