Sulfonamide desensitization in solid organ transplant recipients: A protocol-driven approach during the index transplant hospitalization.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the first-line agent for Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis for solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients because of its efficacy for this indication, extended antimicrobial coverage, and favorable cost. Reported sulfonamide allergy is not uncommon and often results in TMP-SMX avoidance. Desensitization offers an efficacious and cost-effective alternative to TMP-SMX avoidance. Herein, we reviewed our experience with desensitization during the index transplant hospitalization among 52 SOT recipients with history of a non-anaphylactic sulfonamide allergy. Of those enrolled in the desensitization protocol, 92% (48/52) completed the protocol, with nearly 80% (41/52) still on TMP-SMX at 3 months without adverse reaction. Eleven patients discontinued TMP-SMX (7 for allergic reactions and 4 for non-allergic reasons) and switched to pentamidine. A cost savings of $575 per desensitization was calculated based on annual wholesale drug prices, for a total savings of $23 575. Additionally, the protocol did not delay discharge in any patient nor was it associated with any severe allergic reactions. These findings suggest TMP-SMX desensitization is safe and effective in SOT recipients with a history of non-anaphylactic, non-life-threatening sulfonamide hypersensitivity.

Successful outpatient graded administration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in patients without HIV and with a history of sulfonamide adverse drug reaction.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) desensitization have been widely reported in the HIV literature but less so in the non-HIV literature. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of graded administration of TMP-SMX in patients without HIV and with a history of TMP-SMX adverse drug reaction (ADR). METHODS: A retrospective chart review, 2004-2012, of all the patients without HIV seen in the Division of Allergic Diseases and with a history of TMP-SMX ADR who underwent outpatient graded administration of TMP-SMX was conducted. The medical record was reviewed for age, sex, details of the initial ADR to TMP-SMX, an indication for TMP-SMX administration, and outcome. Patients also were contacted by telephone, and medical records were reviewed to determine long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (46 women [64%]; mean [SD] age, 57.7 ± 13.89 years]) were included. The most common patient-reported reactions to TMP-SMX were rash 39 (54%), and hives 9 (13%). TMP-SMX administration was needed for the following indications: prophylaxis (62 [86%]) and treatment of infection (10 [14%]). Forty-three of the patients (60%) underwent a 1-day TMP-SMX administration protocol. Thirty-five of the 43 (81%) underwent a 6-step (90 minutes to 6 hours) protocol and 7 of the 43 (16%) underwent a novel 14-step TMP-SMX protocol. Twenty-nine (40%) underwent a >1-day TMP-SMX administration protocol. Our overall success rate was 90% (mean duration of 11 months). Ninety-eight percent of the patients successfully completed a 1-day graded administration protocol, and 76% successfully completed a >1-day protocol. TMP-SMX was stopped in 8 patients because of the ADR. CONCLUSION: We report the largest case series of successful outpatient graded administration of TMP-SMX with both 1-day and >1-day protocols, which have shown to be safe and well tolerated in patients without HIV and with a history of sulfonamide ADR.

Antibodies to co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim and/or sulfamethoxazole) related to the presence of the drug in a commercial low-ionic-strength solution.

BACKGROUND: Drug-dependent antibodies have been associated with approximately 10% of acquired immune hemolytic anemia cases. These antibodies are a rare cause of interference in pretransfusion red blood cell (RBC) serologic testing. The aim of this work was to report three cases of subjects developing antibodies against co-trimoxazole, a combination of trimethoprim (TMP) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX). CASE REPORT AND METHODS: Blood samples of donor/patients were referred to our laboratory for the exploration of a positive antibody detection test. There was no recent history of drug taking. Antibody identification was performed by gel test using an indirect antiglobulin test, with reagent RBCs in low-ionic-strength solutions (LISS) containing co-trimoxazole or not. RESULTS: All three sera showed positive reactions when RBCs were resuspended in LISS containing co-trimoxazole, but negative reactions when RBCs were resuspended in LISS without antibiotic. We detected antibodies against co-trimoxazole showing three different antibody patterns: anti-TMP plus anti-SMX, anti-TMP alone, or anti-SMX alone. Anti-TMP showed an apparent anti-Ku specificity in the two cases where it was present. Anti-SMX showed an apparent anti-H specificity in one of the two cases described. The drug-dependent antibodies were not associated with acquired hemolytic anemia or other pathologies. CONCLUSION: Antibodies against co-trimoxazole may only be detected when using a diluent for reagent RBCs containing the drug in question. Antibody pattern (anti-TMP and/or anti-SMX) may vary according to individuals' immune response. Drug-dependent antibodies may react as antibodies against a high-prevalence antigen, supporting the hypothesis of antibodies to drug and membrane components. Drug-dependent antibodies such as anti-co-trimoxazole may be a serologic finding without clinical features.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced hepatotoxicity in a pediatric patient.

Due to the escalating rates of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infection, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is being used increasingly in the pediatric population for skin and soft tissue infections. Although this combination agent has been associated with a hypersensitivity syndrome involving cutaneous skin eruptions, pediatric cases of TMP-SMX-induced hepatotoxicity are rare. We describe a relatively healthy, 9-year-old boy who developed a CA-MRSA skin and soft tissue infection and was treated with TMP-SMX. After 14 days of therapy, he was taken to the emergency department with a 3-day history of fever, headache, and neck pain. He was diagnosed with a viral syndrome, acetaminophen was prescribed, and he was sent home. Three days later, the patient returned to the emergency department with fever, vomiting, decreased energy and appetitie, and suprapubic abdominal pain, and he was hospitalized. Laboratory test results revealed elevated liver function test values. After other potential causes of liver toxicity were excluded, TMP-SMX was determined to be the cause of his acute liver toxicity. The drug was discontinued, his symptoms resolved, and his liver function tests returned to normal. Use of the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated a probable relationship (score of 5) between the patient's development of hepatotoxicity and the TMP-SMX therapy. This rare adverse reaction to TMP-SMX has been reported in adults; however, to our knowledge, it has been reported in only five other children. Due to the increasing use of TMP-SMX in children, clinicians should be aware of this potentially life-threatening, immunemediated hypersensitivity reaction. Fortunately, however, the hepatotoxicity appears to resolve after discontinuation of the TMP-SMX therapy in most reported cases. This case report illustrates the importance of early detection of drug-induced hepatotoxicity and timely drug discontinuation to prevent the need for liver transplantation.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome associated with a marked increase in anti-paramyxovirus antibody titers in a scleroderma patient.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) is characterized by a severe multiorgan hypersensitivity reaction that usually appears after prolonged exposure to certain drugs and may be related to reactivation of herpes viruses. There have been few reports regarding the clinical association of DIHS with pathogens other than herpes viruses. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case of scleroderma with DIHS associated with paramyxovirus infection. A 61-year-old man with early diffuse cutaneous scleroderma with myositis and progressive interstitial pneumonia developed generalized erythema with high fever 3 weeks after taking sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. The diagnosis of DIHS was made based on the patient's history of using an offending drug, clinical manifestations and laboratory data showing peripheral eosinophilia with the presence of atypical lymphocytes. Virological tests showed significant increases of antibody titers against mumps virus and parainfluenza virus type 2, which strongly suggested that paramyxovirus infection occurred during the clinical course of DIHS. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that paramyxovirus infection had contributed to the development of DIHS in this patient and that there is a need to seek evidence of other viral infections in some cases of DIHS, especially those without herpes virus reactivation/infection.

Successfully treated nosocomial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia following desensitization to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Because trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) remains the most effective drug for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections, desensitization should be considered in patients with hypersensitivity to TMP-SMX.

[Desensitization to cotrimoxazole, rifampicin and penicillin G in nine patients with prior hypersensitivity]. / Original Breve Desensibilización de cotrimoxazol, rifampicina y penicilina G en nueve pacientes con hipersensibilidad previa.

OBJECTIVE: To present a protocol for the administration and development technique of the desensitization regimens for cotrimoxazole, rifampicin and penicillin G hypersensibility. METHOD: A review of the available desensitization protocols for these antibiotics and a retrospective study of desensitization processes undertaken in the center from 1998. A development technique of the antibiotic dosages was designed. RESULTS: Desensitization regimens for cotrimoxazole, rifampicin and penicillin G undertaken in the center in 9 patients came from a protocol by Glucksteins et al., Holland et al. and Wendal et al., respectively. After the literature review and the satisfactory results that allowed subsequent antibiotic administration in the 9 cases, these regimens were established as protocols of the center. CONCLUSIONS: Dosage development and patient administration have a practical application and can help to decrease the potential mistakes related to the complexity of the process.

Desensibilización de cotrimoxazol, rifampicina y penicilina G en nueve pacientes con hipersensibilidad previa / Desensitization to cotrimoxazole, rifampicin and penicillin G in nine patients with prior hypersensitivity

Objetivo: Protocolizar la administración y la técnica de elaboraciónde las pautas de desensibilización de cotrimoxazol, rifampicinay penicilina G.Método: Búsqueda bibliográfica en MEDLINE de los protocolosdisponibles y estudio retrospectivo de las desensibilizacionesaplicadas en el centro desde 1998. Diseño gráfico de la elaboraciónde las tomas de cada antibiótico.Resultados: Se ha realizado un total de 9 desensibilizacionesde cotrimoxazol, rifampicina y penicilina G siguiendo el protocolode Glucksteins y cols., Holland y cols. y Wendal y cols., respectivamente,permitiendo la readministración del antibiótico en todoslos casos. Los resultados tanto obtenidos en el centro como publicadosen la literatura y la no existencia de nuevos protocolos queaporten una mayor evidencia confirman la idoneidad de los protocolosaplicados.Conclusiones: La elaboración y administración al paciente delos protocolos seleccionados presentan una aplicación prácticaque permite disminuir los posibles errores derivados de la complejidaddel proceso

Objective: To present a protocol for the administration anddevelopment technique of the desensitization regimens for cotrimoxazole,rifampicin and penicillin G hypersensibility.Method: A review of the available desensitization protocolsfor these antibiotics and a retrospective study of desensitizationprocesses undertaken in the center from 1998. A developmenttechnique of the antibiotic dosages was designed.Results: Desensitization regimens for cotrimoxazole,rifampicin and penicillin G undertaken in the center in 9 patientscame from a protocol by Glucksteins et al., Holland et al. andWendal et al., respectively. After the literature review and the satisfactoryresults that allowed subsequent antibiotic administrationin the 9 cases, these regimens were established as protocols ofthe center.Conclusions: Dosage development and patient administrationhave a practical application and can help to decrease thepotential mistakes related to the complexity of the process

Association of drug-serum protein adducts and anti-drug antibodies in dogs with sulphonamide hypersensitivity: a naturally occurring model of idiosyncratic drug toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Sulphonamide antimicrobials, such as sulphamethoxazole (SMX), provide effective infection prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients, but can lead to drug hypersensitivity (HS) reactions. These reactions also occur in dogs, with a similar time course and clinical presentation as seen in humans. OBJECTIVES: Drug-serum adducts and anti-drug antibodies have been identified in sulphonamide HS humans. The aim of this study was to determine whether similar markers were present in dogs with sulphonamide HS. METHODS: Thirty-four privately owned sulphonamide HS dogs, 10 sulphonamide-'tolerant' dogs, 18 sulphonamide-naïve dogs, and four dogs experimentally dosed with SMX and the oxidative metabolite SMX-nitroso, were tested for drug-serum adducts by immunoblotting, and anti-drug antibodies by ELISA. RESULTS: Sulphonamide-serum adducts were found in 10/20 HS dogs tested (50%), but in no tolerant dogs. Anti-sulphonamide IgG antibodies were detected in 17/34 HS dogs (50%), but in only one tolerant dog; antibody absorbance values were significantly higher in HS dogs. There was a significant association between the presence of sulphonamide-serum adducts and anti-sulphonamide antibodies (P = 0.009). Anti-drug antibodies were also found in dogs experimentally dosed with SMX-nitroso followed by SMX, but not in a dog dosed with drug vehicle, followed by SMX. CONCLUSION: Similar humoral markers are present in dogs and humans with sulphonamide HS, supporting the use of dogs as a naturally occurring model for this syndrome in humans. These data suggest the potential use of drug-serum adducts and anti-drug antibodies as markers for sulphonamide HS. Preliminary data indicate that anti-sulphonamide antibodies may be triggered by the SMX-nitroso metabolite, not by the parent drug, in dogs.

Hydrochlorothiazide-induced angioedema in a patient allergic to sulfonamide antibiotics: evidence from a case report and a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving sulfonamide antibiotics have been frequently documented in the literature, but cross-reactivity with sulfonamide non-antibiotics rarely has been reported. CASE SUMMARY: An 82-year-old woman with a history of hypersensitivity reactions to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim resulting in angioedema and rash presented to the emergency department (ED) with angioedema and severe dysphagia, shortness of breath, and rash after receiving valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) for 4 months. Valsartan was identified as the most likely cause of the symptoms and was discontinued; however, the patient continued to have weekly episodes of angioedema and eventually returned to the ED. HCTZ was discontinued at the second ED visit, and the angioedema disappeared. However, it reappeared after reinitiation of HCTZ, and the patient returned to the ED again; this time with more severe symptoms. After the third ED visit and second hospitalization, HCTZ was permanently discontinued, and the angioedema has not returned. HCTZ was the definite cause of angioedema in this patient based on a score of 9 on the 10-point Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale. CONCLUSIONS: Although the probability of true cross-reactivity is not known, clinicians should be aware that an allergic-like reaction to sulfonamide-containing non-antibiotics may occur in patients with known allergies to sulfonamide-containing antibiotics. These patients should be monitored closely when receiving these drugs. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether angioedema should be added to the list of adverse events associated with HCTZ.

Fixed drug eruption induced by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: evidence for a link to HLA-A30 B13 Cw6 haplotype.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports indicated a significant association between fixed drug eruption (FDE) and HLA class I antigens. A strong correlation was found between B22 antigen and feprazone-induced FDE. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the association between HLA class I antigens and FDE in Turkey, a country where feprazone is not on the market and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is most often the offending drug. METHODS: HLA class I typing was performed by lymphocytotoxicity assay in 67 unrelated patients with FDE, all established by oral provocation. The frequencies are compared with those of 2378 control subjects. RESULTS: Significantly higher (P <.001) frequencies of the A30 antigen and A30 B13 Cw6 haplotype were found in 42 patients with FDE induced by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. HLA-B55 (split of B22) was present exclusively in trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced FDE, and in higher frequency than in control subjects. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, ours is the first report indicating a link between A30 B13 Cw6 haplotype and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced FDE. In addition, HLA-B22 was increased in patients with FDE caused by a drug other than feprazone.

A 5-day course of oral desensitization to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (T/S) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus type-1 infection who were previously intolerant to T/S.

BACKGROUND: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (T/S) is an essential drug in patients with human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection to prevent opportunistic infections. About 40% to 60% of them develop skin rash which leads to discontinue the medication. A precise mechanism of the reaction is not known. OBJECTIVE: To make the patients more tolerable to the medication and to make clear whether or not the reaction is caused by serum sulfamethoxazole-specific IgE. METHODS: We established a 5-day protocol, in which T/S was administered orally as a granular form in increasing doses beginning with 0.005 g (it contains trimethoprim 0.4 mg and sulfamethoxazole 2 mg) and doubled every 12 hours until the therapeutic dose was achieved. We tried to desensitize T/S in 17 patients with HIV-1 infection who were previously intolerant to T/S and measured the specific IgE in sera. RESULTS: Desensitization was successfully completed in 15 (88.2%) of the patients. In two patients who failed the desensitization, one was due to fever and the other was gastric irritation. During followup in a mean period of 16.6 months (range, 8 to 23 months) as of May, 1999, none has had Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) while receiving T/S after desensitization. Sulfamethoxazole-specific IgE did not increase, indicating that it was not the major cause of skin rash due to T/S in our cases. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results show that most patients who were thought to be intolerant to T/S and had no sulfamethoxazole-specific IgE can be safely desensitized and received the drug subsequently as an effective prophylaxis for PCP.

Effect of clarithromycin on experimental rhinovirus-16 colds: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Macrolide antibiotics are frequently prescribed to patients with symptoms of a common cold. Despite their lack of proven antiviral activity, macrolide antibiotics may have anti-inflammatory actions, such as inhibition of mucus secretion and production of interleukins 6 and 8 by epithelial cells. Because the symptoms of rhinovirus colds are attributed to the inflammatory response to infection, we studied the effects of treatment with clarithromycin on the symptomatic and inflammatory response to nasal inoculation with rhinovirus. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, double-blind, controlled trial in 24 healthy subjects who were seronegative for antibodies to rhinovirus-16. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either clarithromycin (500 mg) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (800/160 mg, as a control antibiotic) twice a day for 8 days, beginning 24 hours before inoculation with rhinovirus-16. RESULTS: All 12 subjects in each group were infected and developed symptomatic colds. The groups did not differ in the intensity of cold symptoms (median [25th to 75th percentile] score in the clarithromycin group of 25 [5 to 33] versus 21 [11 to 26] in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group, P = 0.86), weight of nasal secretions (25 g [8 to 56 g] versus 12 g [5 to 28 g], P = 0.27), or decline in nasal peak flow during the 8 days following viral inoculation. In both groups, similar and significant increases from baseline were observed in the numbers of total cells and neutrophils, and in the concentrations of interleukins 6 and 8, in nasal lavage fluid during the cold. The changes that we observed did not differ from those in an untreated historical control group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that clarithromycin treatment has little or no effect on the severity of cold symptoms or the intensity of neutrophilic nasal inflammation in experimental rhinovirus-16 colds.