Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Trends Hear ; 22: 2331216518805690, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30353784

RESUMO

Aversiveness of loud sounds is a frequent complaint by hearing aid users, especially when fitted bilaterally. This study investigates whether loudness summation can be held responsible for this finding. Two aspects of loudness summation should be taken into account: spectral loudness summation for broadband signals and binaural loudness summation for signals that are presented binaurally. In this study, the effect of different symmetrical hearing losses was studied. Measurements were obtained with the widely used technique of Adaptive Categorical Loudness Scaling. For large bandwidths, spectral loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners was found to be greater than that for normal-hearing listeners, both for monaurally and binaurally presented signals. For binaural loudness summation, the effect of hearing loss was not significant. In all cases, individual differences were substantial.


Assuntos
Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/instrumentação , Auxiliares de Audição , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Audição , Percepção Sonora , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Estimulação Acústica , Idoso , Audiometria de Tons Puros , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/efeitos adversos , Estimulação Elétrica , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Auxiliares de Audição/efeitos adversos , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/fisiopatologia , Perda Auditiva/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador
2.
J Laryngol Otol ; 131(8): 667-670, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28625187

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The percutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction device can be associated with more soft tissue complications when compared to the magnetic transcutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction device. This study aimed to determine whether fewer soft tissue complications may result in the transcutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction device being a lower cost option in hearing rehabilitation. METHODS: This retrospective case note review included adult patients who underwent implantation with the transcutaneous Cochlear Attract (n = 22) or percutaneous Cochlear DermaLock (n = 25) bone-anchored hearing aids between September 2013 and December 2014. The number of post-operative clinic appointments, complications and treatments undertaken, and calculated cost average, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Although the transcutaneous device was slightly more expensive than the percutaneous device, the percutaneous device was associated with a greater number of soft tissue complications and, as a result, the percutaneous device had significantly higher follow-up costs in the first six months following surgery. CONCLUSION: The transcutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction device may represent a more cost-effective method of hearing rehabilitation compared to the percutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction device.


Assuntos
Condução Óssea , Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/instrumentação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implante Coclear/economia , Implante Coclear/métodos , Implantes Cocleares/economia , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/efeitos adversos , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/economia , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osseointegração , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Trials ; 18(1): 47, 2017 01 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28129779

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss (HL) is a disability associated with poorer health-related quality of life including an increased risk for loneliness, isolation, functional fitness declines, falls, hospitalization and premature mortality. The purpose of this pilot trial is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel intervention to reduce loneliness, improve functional fitness, social connectedness, hearing and health-related quality of life in older adults with HL. METHODS: This 10-week, single-blind, pilot randomized control trial (RCT) will include a convenience sample of ambulatory adults aged 65 years or older with self-reported HL. Following baseline assessments, participants will be randomized to either intervention (exercise, health education, socialization and group auditory rehabilitation (GAR)) or control (GAR only) groups. The intervention group will attend a local YMCA twice a week and the control group once a week. Intervention sessions will include 45 min of strengthening, balance and resistance exercises, 30 min of group walking at a self-selected pace and 60 min of interactive health education or GAR. The control group will attend 60-min GAR sessions. GAR sessions will include education about hearing, hearing technologies, enhancing communication skills, and psychosocial support. Pre-post trial data collection and measures will include: functional fitness (gait speed, 30-s Sit to Stand Test), hearing and health-related quality of life, loneliness, depression, social participation and social support. At trial end, feasibility (recruitment, randomization, retention, acceptability) and GAR will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: Despite evidence suggesting that HL is associated with declines in functional fitness, there are no studies aimed at addressing functional fitness declines associated with the disability of HL. This pilot trial will provide knowledge about the physical, mental and social impacts on health related to HL as a disability. This will inform the feasibility of a larger RCT and preliminary evidence about the initial effects of a novel, community-based, holistic intervention addressing both the negative psychosocial and functional physical effects of HL among older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02662192 . Registered on 14 January 2016.


Assuntos
Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/métodos , Terapia por Exercício , Processos Grupais , Perda Auditiva/fisiopatologia , Audição , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Aptidão Física , Qualidade de Vida , Caminhada , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/psicologia , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Solidão , Masculino , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Projetos Piloto , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Risco , Método Simples-Cego , Comportamento Social , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Trends Hear ; 182014 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25361601

RESUMO

The signal processing and fitting methods used for hearing aids have mainly been designed to optimize the intelligibility of speech. Little attention has been paid to the effectiveness of hearing aids for listening to music. Perhaps as a consequence, many hearing-aid users complain that they are not satisfied with their hearing aids when listening to music. This issue inspired the Internet-based survey presented here. The survey was designed to identify the nature and prevalence of problems associated with listening to live and reproduced music with hearing aids. Responses from 523 hearing-aid users to 21 multiple-choice questions are presented and analyzed, and the relationships between responses to questions regarding music and questions concerned with information about the respondents, their hearing aids, and their hearing loss are described. Large proportions of the respondents reported that they found their hearing aids to be helpful for listening to both live and reproduced music, although less so for the former. The survey also identified problems such as distortion, acoustic feedback, insufficient or excessive gain, unbalanced frequency response, and reduced tone quality. The results indicate that the enjoyment of listening to music with hearing aids could be improved by an increase of the input and output dynamic range, extension of the low-frequency response, and improvement of feedback cancellation and automatic gain control systems.


Assuntos
Percepção Auditiva , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/instrumentação , Auxiliares de Audição , Música , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/efeitos adversos , Desenho de Equipamento , Auxiliares de Audição/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Internet , Satisfação do Paciente , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Int J Audiol ; 53(2): 121-7, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24304359

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the intracochlear electrode position on the residual hearing and VNG- and cVEMP responses. DESIGN: Prospective pilot study. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirteen adult patients who underwent unilateral cochlear implant surgery were examined with high-resolution rotational tomography after cochlear implantation. All subjects were also tested with VNG, and 12 of the subjects were tested with cVEMP and audiometry before and after surgery. RESULTS: We found that although the electrode was originally planned to be positioned inside the scala tympani, only 8 of 13 had full insertion into the scala tympani. Loss of cVEMP response occurred to the same extent in the group with full scala tympani positioning and the group with scala vestibuli involvement. There was a non-significant difference in the loss of caloric response and residual hearing between the two groups. Interscalar dislocation of the electrode inside the cochlea was observed in two patients. A higher loss of residual hearing could be seen in the group with electrode dislocation between the scalae. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that intracochlear electrode dislocation is a possible cause to loss of residual hearing during cochlear implantation but cannot be the sole cause of postoperative vestibular loss.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/métodos , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/métodos , Transtornos da Audição/terapia , Audição , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Rampa do Tímpano/fisiopatologia , Rampa do Vestíbulo/fisiopatologia , Vestíbulo do Labirinto/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Audiometria , Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implante Coclear/instrumentação , Implantes Cocleares , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/efeitos adversos , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/instrumentação , Feminino , Transtornos da Audição/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Audição/fisiopatologia , Transtornos da Audição/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nistagmo Fisiológico , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Desenho de Prótese , Rampa do Tímpano/diagnóstico por imagem , Rampa do Vestíbulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Potenciais Evocados Miogênicos Vestibulares , Vestíbulo do Labirinto/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravação em Vídeo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...