Development of crizotinib-associated renal cyst in a non-small cell lung cancer patient with ALK fusion: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Crizotinib, an oral first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is superior to systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with positive rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). However, an increased incidence of renal and hepatic cysts has been reported in the patients on crizotinib treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we describe a case of a 71-year-old Chinese women developed multiple cystic lesions in kidney and liver during crizotinib treatment for the primary and metastatic NSCLC. The renal and hepatic cysts were noted by CT scan 3 months after crizotinib treatment, which were spontaneously and significantly regressed after stopping crizotinib. CONCLUSIONS: Based on literature review and our experience in this case report, we concluded that crizotinib-associated renal cyst (CARCs) has features of malignancy and abscess in radiographic imaging, and thus, pathological confirmation is necessary to avoid inappropriate treatment decision. In addition, to benefit the patients with progress-free survival (PFS), switching from crizotinib to alectinib is recommended for the treatment of NSCLC patients who developed CARCs.

[A case of crizotinib-associated renal cysts].

Crizotinib-associated renal cysts (CARC) are the development of new renal cysts or pre-existing renal cysts after the treatment with crizotinib. Most CARC disappear after crizotinib is stopped. A few CARC showed aggressive behavior that could go beyond the invasion of the renal cortex into nearby structures, including perirenal space, psoas major muscle, intestine, and abdominal wall. A case of EML4-ALK fusion mutation in invasive lung adenocarcinoma has been reported. Multiple cystic changes occurred repeatedly in both kidneys, right rectus muscle, and psoas major muscle after treatment with crizotinib, and spontaneous absorption and resolution after discontinuation of the drug.

Alectinibe para o tratamento do câncer de pulmão de células não pequenas localmente avançado ou metastático cujos tumores expressam rearranjo no gene ALK em pacientes não tratados previamente ou após falha com crizotinibe / Alectinib for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer whose tumors express regrowth of the ALK gene in patients not previously treated or after failure with crizotinib

INTRODUÇÃO: O câncer de pulmão pode ser divido em dois grandes grupos, carcinoma de células não pequenas (CPCNP) e o carcinoma de pequenas células. O primeiro compreende aproximadamente 85% dos cânceres de pulmão e pode ser dividido em quatro subtipos histológicos principais: adenocarcinoma, carcinoma de células escamosas, carcinoma adenoescamoso e carcinoma de células grandes. Normalmente, o CPCNP é diagnosticado em estágio avançado para o qual a sobrevida em cinco anos estimada está entre 3% e 6%. A quinase do linfoma anaplásico (ALK) é uma tirosina quinase cuja expressão pode ocorrer de forma aberrante em vários tipos de câncer. No CPCNP os rearranjos cromossômicos nos loci do gene ALK são encontrados em 3 a 5% dos casos. Nesse caso o rearranjo cromossômico mais comum resulta no gene de fusão ELM-ALK, cuja atividade está relacionada a tumores com caraterísticas clinicopatológicas distintas e tem importância na correta programação do tratamento. Tumores positivos para os genes de fusão ALK estão associados a características clínicas específicas, tais como ausência de histórico de tabagismo e incidência em indivíduos mais jovens. Os tumores ALK positivos são altamente sensíveis ao tratamento com medicamentos inibidores da ALK (terapia-alvo). No SUS est

Safety and efficacy of alectinib versus crizotinib in alk-positive non-small cell lung cancer: An update meta-analysis.

Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of alectinib compared with crizotinib and provide a reference for clinical use of ALK-TKI, systematically. We searched articles published update till October, 2021 based on the electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. All trials analyzed the summary odds ratios (ORs) of the interesting outcomes. Three RCTs, including six studies were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) =0.33 (95%CI=0.21-0.51, P<0.00001) shown that the alectinib group achieved significant progress-free survival (PFS) superiority than crizotinib, consistent with those for the with (P=0.001) or without (P<0.00001) measurable CNS lesions at baseline. Also, the regimen of the alectinib did achieved benefit in the ORR (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.41-3.06, P=0.0002) than crizotinib. Due to the limited data, the pool result of the difference of overall survival (OS) was without statistically significant (P=0.35). With regard to the safety, grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with alectinib than crizotinib (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.31-0.90, P=0.02). As compared with crizotinib, alectinib demonstrated better PFS efficacy and comparable safety as a first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). OS data remain immature, further trials with long-term survival rate have future to look forward to.

Interstitial lung disease risk of anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a rare but life-threatening and fatal treatment-related pneumonitis. This study investigated the association between anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) and ILD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Cases of ILD that developed after treatment with an ALK-TKI in the Food and Drug Administration' s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data were assessed. We also described the clinical features of these cases and evaluated onset time, hospitalization, life-threatening condition, and fatality rate of ILD developed after treatment with an ALK-TKI. RESULTS: All five ALK-TKI regimens were significantly associated with ILD. The median onset time to ILD was significantly different for brigatinib, crizotinib, alectinib, lorlatinib, and ceritinib: 4.5, 25, 35.5, 54.5, and 84 days, respectively. ALK-TKI-associated ILD resulted in hospitalization in 55.77% of patients and death or life-threatening outcomes in 43.03%. The highest and lowest proportions of ILD-related fatalities were observed after crizotinib and alectinib treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ALK-TKIs were associated with ILD; therefore, the risk of developing ILD after treatment with an ALK-TKI should be carefully considered in clinical settings.

Cardiac arrhythmias associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors: an analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) may provoke cardiac arrhythmias. We conducted this pharmacovigilance analysis to research cardiac arrhythmias associated with ALK-TKIs using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The first ALK-TKI, named crizotinib, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on 26 August 2011 for the treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated ALK-TKIs-induced cardiac arrhythmias, by using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) for mining the adverse event report signals in the FAERS database between January 2016 and June 2022. RESULTS: We identified a total of 362 ALK-TKIs-related cardiac arrhythmia reports which appeared to influence more men (64.44%) than women (30.76%), with a median age of 68 (interquartile range [IQR] 7-74) years. Compared with the full database, ALK-TKIs were detected with pharmacovigilance of cardiac arrhythmias (ROR025 = 1.26, IC025 = 0.26). Crizotinib and alectinib were found to be related to higher reporting of arrhythmias. The median time to onset (TTO) among five ALK-TKI therapies was significantly different (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: ALK-TKIs present different frequencies of cardiac arrhythmias reporting, with only crizotinib and alectinib producing positive signals in high-level group term (HLGT) level arrhythmia. The time interval between the initial of drug treatment to the onset of arrhythmia varies greatly and cannot be predicted.

Plain language summary of the updated results from the CROWN study comparing lorlatinib with crizotinib in people with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary shows the updated results of an ongoing research study called CROWN that was published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine in December 2022. In the CROWN study, researchers looked at the effects of two study medicines called lorlatinib and crizotinib. The study included people with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that had not been treated previously. All people in the study had cancer cells with changes (known as alterations) in a gene called anaplastic lymphoma kinase, or ALK. This ALK gene is involved in cancer growth. In this updated study, researchers looked at the continued benefit in people who took lorlatinib compared with people who took crizotinib after 3 years. WHAT DID THIS STUDY FIND?: After 3 years of being observed, people who took lorlatinib were more likely to be alive without their cancer getting worse than people who took crizotinib. At 3 years, 64% of people who took lorlatinib were alive without their cancer getting worse compared with 19% of people who took crizotinib. The cancer was less likely to have spread within or to the brain in people who took lorlatinib than in people who took crizotinib. After 3 years of being observed, 61% of people were still taking lorlatinib and 8% of people were still taking crizotinib. People who took lorlatinib had more severe side effects than people who took crizotinib. However, these side effects were manageable. The most common side effects with lorlatinib were high levels of cholesterol or high levels of triglycerides (a type of fat) in the blood. Life-threatening side effects were seen in 13% of people who took lorlatinib and 8% in crizotinib. Two people who took lorlatinib died because of side effects from lorlatinib. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?: The updated results from the CROWN study showed that a larger percentage of people who took lorlatinib continued to benefit from their treatment after being observed for 3 years compared with those who took crizotinib.

Decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rates in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with crizotinib.

Introduction: Crizotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, and there are uncertainties about its effect on kidney function. In this study, it was aimed to document the possible adverse effect of the drug on kidney functions. Materials and Methods: The estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) of the patients were calculated by creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration and compared by months using the paired samples t-test. Kaplan-Meier survival method was used for progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) analysis. Results: Twenty-six patients who received crizotinib were included in the study, and the median progression-free survival time with crizotinib was 14.2 months and the median OS time was 27.4 months. There was a significant reduction of eGFR after the 1st month of crizotinib treatment when compared to the rate before treatment initiation (P < 0.001). The eGFR values at the end of the 1st month and the 2nd month of treatment and the 2nd and 3rd months of treatment were statistically similar (P = 0.086, P = 0.663; respectively). This decrease in eGFR values was reversible, and there was no difference detected between pretreatment and posttreatment discontinuation (P = 0.100). Conclusion: A reversible decrease in renal functions was detected in patients using crizotinib. When the literature data are examined, it is thought that the reason for this decrease may be related to the increase in renal inflammation or a pseudo decrease due to the decrease in creatinine excretion. When evaluating renal functions in these patients, using noncreatine-based (iothalamate, etc.) calculations can give more accurate results.

Lung Injury Induced by Crizotinib and Entrectinib in a Patient with ROS1-rearranged Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

We herein report the first case of c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1)-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in which lung injury was induced by crizotinib and entrectinib. Crizotinib was administered as first-line chemotherapy in a woman in her early 70s with stage IV NSCLC showing ROS1 rearrangement. This resulted in the development of drug-induced organizing pneumonia, which was alleviated by discontinuing drug administration and giving corticosteroids. Following second-line chemotherapy with entrectinib, a similar lung injury was noted. In cases of crizotinib-induced lung injury, physicians must be alert for drug-induced lung injury in subsequent treatment with entrectinib.

Risks of cardiovascular toxicities associated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinases (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective and safe targeted therapies used in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). However, ALK-TKIs associated cardiovascular toxicities in patients with ALK-positive NSCLCremain incompletely characterized. We conducted the first meta-analysis to investigate this. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine the cardiovascular toxicities associated with these agents, we carried out a meta-analysis comparing ALK-TKIs with chemotherapy and a meta-analysis comparing crizotinib with other ALK-TKIs. Statistical analysis was conducted to calculate the RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random effects or fixed-effect models according to the heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies (2855 patients) were included. ALK-TKIs ranked to have more severe cardiovascular toxicities than chemotherapy (RR 5.03, 95% CI 1.97-12.84, P = 0.0007) . Compared with other ALK-TKIs, increased risks of cardiac disorders and VTEs associated with crizotinib were found (cardiac disorders RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.07-2.86, P = 0.03; risk of VTEs RR 3.97, 95% CI 1.69-9.31, P = 0.002; respectively). CONCLUSION: ALK-TKIs were associated with higher risks of cardiovascular toxicities. Special attention should be given to the risks of cardiac disorders and VTEs related to crizotinib therapy.

Successful Treatment with Low-dose Crizotinib in a Patient with ROS1-rearranged Lung Cancer Who Developed Crizotinib-induced Heart Failure.

Crizotinib shows antitumor activity against C-ros oncogene 1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation and bradycardia are known as cardiac adverse effects, little is known about crizotinib-related heart failure. Our patient with C-ros oncogene 1-rearranged NSCLC on a reduced dose of crizotinib (200 mg twice daily) after initially experiencing bradycardia and QTc prolongation developed crizotinib-induced heart failure. With further dose reduction (250 mg once daily), there was no recurrence of any cardiac adverse effects, and the patient achieved a long-term response. Although crizotinib can cause heart failure, continuation of crizotinib at a low dose may be an effective treatment option.

Investigating the efficacy of osimertinib and crizotinib in phase 3 clinical trials on anti-cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity: are real-world studies the way forward?

BACKGROUND.: Oncology clinical trials demonstrate the risk of cardiotoxicity but are not sufficient to reveal the true risk. In this article, we compared the incidence of cardiotoxicity of crizotinib and osimertinib from a real-world study to data reported by phase 3 clinical trials. METHODS.: Data from an ongoing real-world lung cancer study was used as a comparator. Patients were recruited retrospectively with the criteria of being diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and having received at least a course of treatment of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor and/or immune check-point inhibitor. Characteristics of the patients who developed cardiotoxicity associated with osimertinib and crizotinib in the real-world lung cancer study were analysed against the inclusion criteria of the corresponding phase 3 clinical trials. Variations of cardiotoxicity incidence among the real-world lung cancer study and clinical trials were investigated. RESULTS.: 18%, n = 37/206, of the patients developed cardiotoxicity. QTc prolongation was the most frequently observed cardiotoxicity (n = 12/37). Osimertinib and crizotinib were the most cardiotoxic agents, each responsible for seven cases of cardiotoxicity. FLAURA, AURA3, PROFILE 1007 and PROFILE 1014 were the included clinical trials for analysis. None of the patients who developed cardiotoxicity in the real-world study would have been eligible to participate in FLAURA and PROFILE 1014 study whereas n = 4/7 and n = 5/7 patients were eligible to participate in AURA3 and PROFILE 1007 trials, respectively. CONCLUSION.: Although phase 3 clinical trials play an important role in understanding the effectiveness and give insights on side-effect profiles, real-world studies can show the real risk of cardiotoxicity more accurately and realistically.

Pulmonary embolism and bradycardia in a NSCLC patient treated with crizotinib for a rare mutation.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is a major global health problem because of its high incidence and mortality. Targeted therapies have transformed treatment of driver-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, recent studies demonstrated that cardiovascular disease (CVD) was the second leading cause of mortality in cancer survivors now, management of patients' cardiovascular health during the course of anticancer therapy has become a great challenge faced by the oncologists. Anticancer related cardiovascular (CV) complications are not limited to traditional chemotherapy, but are also increasingly recognized in targeted therapy. CASE REPORT: We present a case of pulmonary embolism (PE) and bradycardia in a 91-year-old NSCLC patient treated with crizotinib for a rare MET Y1003S mutation. To our knowledge, this is the second report to show antitumor response of crizotinib in lung cancer patients with such a rare mutation. However, the patient complained chest tightness and shortness of breath after a month of standard dose crizotinib therapy. Non-invasive examination revealed new onset bradycardia and PE. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: Such clinical manifestations were associated with targeted therapy-related CV toxicity, on which the emerging discipline cardio-oncology focused, and a multidisciplinary investigation and treatment was conducted. DISCUSSION: This case highlights the CV adverse events of novel therapies and the current challenges to be tackled in cardio-oncology.

Conteltinib (CT-707) in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter, open-label, first-in-human phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Conteltinib (CT-707) is a potent second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) showing promising anti-tumor activities in preclinical studies. This study aimed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and efficacy of conteltinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this multicenter, single-arm, open-label, first-in-human phase 1 study, conteltinib was taken orally at doses of 50 to 800 mg quaque die (QD) in a dose-escalation phase. If the response was observed in a dose cohort of the dose-escalation phase, dose expansion was started. The primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and adverse events assessed by investigators. RESULTS: Between April 13, 2016, and February 8, 2020, 64 ALK-positive NSCLC patients were enrolled, including 41 (64.1%) patients with ALK TKI-naïve and 23 (35.9%) patients who received crizotinib previously. In the dose-escalation phase, 26 patients were treated with conteltinib at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, 450 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg QD. One DLT event was reported at the dose of 600 mg. MTD was not reached. Overall, 58 (90.6%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 9 (14.1%) patients had grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were diarrhea (46 [71.9%]), serum creatinine elevated (29 [45.3%]), aspartate aminotransferase elevated (25 [39.1%]), and nausea (24 [37.5%]). Among 39 ALK TKI-naïve patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 64.1% (25 of 39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 47.2-78.8), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.9 months (95% CI, 9.26-23.3), and median duration of response (DoR) was 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.06-25.8). Among 21 patients who received crizotinib previously, the ORR was 33.3% (7 of 21; 95% CI, 14.6-57.0), median PFS was 6.73 months (95% CI, 4.73-8.54), and median DoR was 6.60 months (95% CI, 3.77-13.3). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, conteltinib showed manageable safety profile, favorable PK properties, and anti-tumor activity in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 600 mg QD for ALK TKI-naïve patients and 300 mg bis in die (BID) for patients who received crizotinib previously. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02695550.

Efficacy and Safety of Brigatinib Compared With Crizotinib in Asian vs. Non-Asian Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic ALK-Inhibitor-Naive ALK+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Final Results From the Phase III ALTA-1L Study.

BACKGROUND: Brigatinib is a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in crizotinib-refractory and ALK inhibitor-naive settings. This analysis assessed brigatinib in Asian vs. non-Asian patients from the first-line ALTA-1L trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis from the phase III ALTA-1L trial of brigatinib vs. crizotinib in ALK inhibitor-naive ALK+ NSCLC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC). Secondary endpoints included confirmed objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) in the overall population and BIRC-assessed intracranial ORR and PFS in patients with brain metastases. RESULTS: Of the 275 randomized patients, 108 were Asian. Brigatinib showed consistent superiority in BIRC-assessed PFS vs. crizotinib in Asian (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.20-0.59]; log-rank P = .0001; median 24.0 vs. 11.1 months) and non-Asian (HR: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.38-0.84]; log-rank P = .0041; median 24.7 vs. 9.4 months) patients. Results were consistent with investigator-assessed PFS and BIRC-assessed intracranial PFS. Brigatinib was well tolerated. Toxicity profiles and dose modification rates were similar between Asian and non-Asian patients. CONCLUSION: Efficacy with brigatinib was consistently better than with crizotinib in Asian and non-Asian patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK inhibitor-naive ALK-+ NSCLC. There were no clinically notable differences in overall safety in Asian vs. non-Asian patients.

Alectinib after failure to crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: results from the Spanish early access program.

This retrospective observational study analyzed the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of 120 patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC) according to data collected between November 2019 and October 2020 in 38 Spanish hospitals. Patients had progressed after 1-5 prior treatment lines (which included crizotinib in any prior line) and received subsequent therapy with alectinib in a local expanded access program. Median age was 58.7 years, 50% of patients were female, 64.1% had ECOG PS of 0-1, 85% presented stage IV, 95% had adenocarcinoma histology and 20.8% had brain metastases. After a median 9.6 months of alectinib treatment, objective response rate (ORR) was 54.5%, disease control rate (DCR) was 80%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was 24.1 months. Patients with brain metastases achieved an intracranial DCR of 71.4%. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 35.8% of patients (14.2% of AEs were grade ≥3). Over 40% of patients received some treatment after alectinib, most frequently lorlatinib (65.2%) and brigatinib (32.6%). This study provides information on real-world treatment patterns and confirms the tolerability and prolonged PFS and OS observed with alectinib in clinical trials, in unselected pretreated patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC.

Post Hoc Analysis of Lorlatinib Intracranial Efficacy and Safety in Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer From the Phase III CROWN Study.

PURPOSE: Lorlatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus crizotinib and showed robust intracranial activity in patients with previously untreated advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase III CROWN trial. Here, we report post hoc efficacy outcomes in patients with and without brain metastases at baseline, and present data on the incidence and management of CNS adverse events (AEs) in CROWN. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line lorlatinib (100 mg once daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day); no crossover between treatment arms was permitted. Tumor assessments, including CNS magnetic resonance imaging, were performed at screening and then at 8-week intervals. Regular assessments of patient-reported outcomes were conducted. RESULTS: PFS by blinded independent central review was improved with lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with and without brain metastases at baseline (12-month PFS rates: 78% v 22% and 78% v 45%, respectively). Lorlatinib was associated with lower 12-month cumulative incidence of CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with (7% v 72%) and without (1% v 18%) brain metastases at baseline. In total, 35% of patients had CNS AEs with lorlatinib, most of grade 1 severity. Occurrence of CNS AEs did not result in a clinically meaningful difference in patient-reported quality of life. At analysis, 56% of CNS AEs had resolved (33% without intervention; 17% with lorlatinib dose modification), and 38% were unresolved; most required no intervention. Lorlatinib dose modification did not notably influence PFS. CONCLUSION: First-line lorlatinib improved PFS outcomes and reduced CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer with or without brain metastases at baseline. Half of all CNS AEs resolved without intervention or with lorlatinib dose modification.

Toxicity profile of anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are commonly used for patients harboring ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the toxicity profile of ALK inhibitors. Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for clinical trials conducted in advanced NSCLC treated with ALK inhibitors. The incidences of pooled adverse events (AEs) were conducted using the random effects model. We included 30 studies in the meta-analysis. Almost all patients receiving ALK inhibitor monotherapy occurred at least one AE. The pooled incidences of grade ≥ 3 AEs were 71.3% for ceritinib 750 mg, 44.6% for crizotinib, 37.4% for alectinib, and 35.3% for ensartinib. Only one study each reported the incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs for brgatinib (72.8%), lorlatinib (72.4%), and ceritinib 450 mg (64.8%), respectively. The rates of dose reduction due to AEs ranking from high to low were ceritinib 750 mg, brigatinib, ceritinib 450 mg, lorlatinib, crizotinib, ensartinib, and alectinib. The rates of treatment discontinuation due to AEs were low, ranging from 3.8% to 10.5%. Gastrointestinal AEs were most common for ceritinib 750 mg. Hepatic transaminases elevation was mostly observed in ceritinib and brigatinib. Rash frequently occurred for ensartinib. Lorlatinib had a high incidence of hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia, which were rarely reported in other ALK inhibitors. The incidences of grade ≥ 3 AEs for individual ALK inhibitor were moderately high yet manageable. Different toxicity spectrums were found in each ALK inhibitor.

Final efficacy and safety data, and exploratory molecular profiling from the phase III ALUR study of alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: At the primary data cut-off, the ALUR study demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and central nervous system (CNS) objective response rate (ORR) with alectinib versus chemotherapy in pretreated, advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. We report final efficacy and safety data, and exploratory molecular profiling. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received prior platinum-doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily (n = 79) or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks; n = 40) until progressive disease, death or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included ORR, CNS ORR and safety. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, then every 6 weeks until progressive disease; molecular factors detected by next-generation sequencing were correlated with outcomes. RESULTS: Investigator-assessed PFS was significantly longer with alectinib than chemotherapy (median 10.9 versus 1.4 months; hazard ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.33; P < 0.001). ORR was 50.6% with alectinib versus 2.5% with chemotherapy (P < 0.001). In patients with measurable CNS metastases at baseline, CNS ORR was 66.7% with alectinib versus 0% with chemotherapy (P < 0.001). No new safety signals were seen. ALK rearrangement was identified in 69.5% (n = 41/59) of baseline plasma samples. Confirmed partial responses were observed with alectinib in 6/11 patients with a secondary ALK mutation and 4/6 patients with a non-EML4-ALK (where EML4 is echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4) fusion. Detection of mutant TP53 in baseline plasma resulted in numerically shorter PFS with alectinib (hazard ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 0.9-3.93). CONCLUSIONS: Final efficacy data from ALUR confirmed the superior PFS, ORR and CNS ORR of alectinib versus chemotherapy in pretreated, advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Alectinib prolonged PFS versus chemotherapy in patients with wild-type or mutant TP53; however, alectinib activity was considerably decreased in patients with mutant TP53.