Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia.

ABSTRACT: Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DIEP) is a rare complication of daptomycin use. Manifestations most commonly include fever, hypoxia, dyspnea, cough, eosinophilia, and lung changes on radiographs and CT. Patients typically have had recent daptomycin exposure and develop fever, dyspnea, infiltrates on chest radiograph, more than 25% eosinophils on bronchoalveolar lavage, and improvement of symptoms after withdrawal of daptomycin. Treatment includes discontinuation of daptomycin, corticosteroids, and supportive measures such as supplemental oxygen. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for DIEP in patients who develop new onset of pulmonary and systemic signs and symptoms after initiation of daptomycin.

Comparison of daptomycin and glycopeptide efficacy and safety for the treatment of Gram-positive infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The indications of daptomycin have been extended to off-label indications including prosthesis-related infection, and bone and joint infection (BJI). However, efficacy and safety have not been thoroughly demonstrated compared with the standard of care. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the treatment effect of daptomycin and glycopeptides for complicated infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing daptomycin and standard of care for Gram-positive infections, published until 30 June 2021. The primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical and microbiological success. The main safety outcome was any severe adverse event (SAE) (grade  ≥3). RESULTS: Overall, eight RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, totalling 1095 patients. Six (75%) were in complicated skin and soft-structure infections, one (12.5%) in bacteraemia and one (12.5%) in a BJI setting. Six RCTs used vancomycin as a comparator and two used either vancomycin or teicoplanin. All-cause mortality and clinical cure were not different between groups. The microbiological cure rate was superior in patients who received daptomycin [risk ratio (RR) = 1.17 (95% CI: 1.01-1.35)]. The risk of SAEs [RR = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.36-0.90)] was lower in the daptomycin arm. CONCLUSIONS: While daptomycin is associated with a significantly lower risk of SAEs and a better microbiological eradication, substantial uncertainty remains about the best treatment strategy in the absence of good-quality evidence, especially in bacteraemia and endocarditis where further RCTs should be conducted.

Daptomycin Plus Oxacillin for Persistent Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: The preferred antibiotic salvage regimen for persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MSSAB) is unclear. Ertapenem with cefazolin or an antistaphylococcal penicillin has been primarily described, but identifying alternative carbapenem-sparing options may support antibiotic stewardship efforts and decrease the risk of antibiotic-associated Clostridioides difficile infection. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin plus oxacillin (D/O) for persistent MSSAB. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort of patients with persistent MSSAB who received D/O between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2023. Adult patients were included if they had blood cultures positive for MSSA ≥72 hours and received D/O combination for ≥48 hours. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, incarcerated, or received another antibiotic considered to have excellent activity against MSSA. The primary outcome was time to MSSA bacteremia clearance post-daptomycin initiation. Secondary outcomes included microbiological cure, hospital length of stay, 90-day all-cause mortality, MSSA bacteremia-related mortality, 90-day readmission for MSSAB, and incidence of antibiotic-associated adverse effects. Time to MSSAB clearance post-D/O initiation was plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimation. RESULTS: Seven unique patient encounters were identified including 4 with endocarditis. Despite a median MSSA bacteremia duration of 7.8 days, median clearance was 2 days post-daptomycin initiation. All achieved microbiological cure, and no adverse effects were reported. Ninety-day all-cause mortality, MSSAB-related mortality, and 90-day readmission for MSSAB occurred in 28.6%, 14.3%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: D/O was an effective, well-tolerated salvage regimen in this cohort and may represent a carbapenem-sparing option for persistent MSSAB.

Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin that may be effective for treating complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial, adults with complicated S. aureus bacteremia were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ceftobiprole at a dose of 500 mg intravenously every 6 hours for 8 days and every 8 hours thereafter, or daptomycin at a dose of 6 to 10 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 24 hours plus optional aztreonam (at the discretion of the trial-site investigators). The primary outcome, overall treatment success 70 days after randomization (defined as survival, bacteremia clearance, symptom improvement, no new S. aureus bacteremia-related complications, and no receipt of other potentially effective antibiotics), with a noninferiority margin of 15%, was adjudicated by a data review committee whose members were unaware of the trial-group assignments. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 390 patients who underwent randomization, 387 (189 in the ceftobiprole group and 198 in the daptomycin group) had confirmed S. aureus bacteremia and received ceftobiprole or daptomycin (modified intention-to-treat population). A total of 132 of 189 patients (69.8%) in the ceftobiprole group and 136 of 198 patients (68.7%) in the daptomycin group had overall treatment success (adjusted difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.1 to 11.1). Findings appeared to be consistent between the ceftobiprole and daptomycin groups in key subgroups and with respect to secondary outcomes, including mortality (9.0% and 9.1%, respectively; 95% CI, -6.2 to 5.2) and the percentage of patients with microbiologic eradication (82.0% and 77.3%; 95% CI, -2.9 to 13.0). Adverse events were reported in 121 of 191 patients (63.4%) who received ceftobiprole and 117 of 198 patients (59.1%) who received daptomycin; serious adverse events were reported in 36 patients (18.8%) and 45 patients (22.7%), respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events (primarily mild nausea) were more frequent with ceftobiprole. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftobiprole was noninferior to daptomycin with respect to overall treatment success in patients with complicated S. aureus bacteremia. (Funded by Basilea Pharmaceutica International and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; ERADICATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03138733.).

Efficacy and safety of vancomycin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vancomycin with the other anti-Gram-positive bacteria antibiotics in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases until August 2022 for studies that compared vancomycin with other antibiotic regimens for treating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Clinical and microbiological responses, adverse events, relapse rate and mortality were considered. RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials and nine retrospective studies were included. The efficacy and safety data of vancomycin differed from those of the comparators group. After subgroup analysis, the differences came mainly from the trials compared with daptomycin. Compared to daptomycin, vancomycin showed a lower microbiological cure rate (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.41∼0.82, I2 = 0%, P = 0.002) and clinical cure rate (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.42∼0.68, I2 = 3%, P < 0.00001), as well as more adverse events (OR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.43∼7.19, I2 = 59%, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of vancomycin in treating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is still excellent but slightly inferior in adverse events. However, this does not affect its use as a first-line drug. Daptomycin is expected to be a better antimicrobial drug.

Ampicillin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium bacteremia: a clinical narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Enterococcus faecium is a commensal microorganism that can cause infections such as bacteremia. Incidence of ampicillin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (EfARSV) bacteremia is on the rise, and the mortality rate is high. Despite much data, the most appropriate treatment remains a question. AREAS COVERED: This article mostly reviews the relevant aspects of EfARSV bacteremia: microbiology, gastrointestinal tract colonization and invasion, antibiotic resistance, epidemiology, risk factors, mortality, and treatment, including pharmacologic components of employed agents and related clinical evidence. A literature search was conducted on PubMed on 31 July 2022, which was updated on 15 November 2022. EXPERT OPINION: EfARSV bacteremia presents high mortality. However, it is uncertain whether mortality is attributable to or a marker of severity/comorbidities. Considering its antibiotic resistance pattern, EfARSV is considered a difficult-to-treat microorganism. Glycopeptides have been used to treat EfARSV, with linezolid and daptomycin serving as potential alternative agents. Yet, the use of daptomycin is controversial due to a higher risk of treatment failures. Clinical evidence on this issue is scarce, unfortunately, and subject to many limitations. Despite increased incidence and mortality, EfARSV bacteremia presents multiple aspects to be addressed in well-conducted studies.

A critical view on the current use of daptomycin in Spain: The daptomise study.

BACKGROUND: The Study on the Clinical Use of DAPTOMycin in Spain (DAPTOMISE Study) is a national surveillance program of daptomycin use. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the current variability in daptomycin consumption across the different hospitals and the adequacy of therapy, specially focused on underdosing. METHODS: All adult and pediatric patients who received, at least, one dose of daptomycin in a single week in 98 institutions in Spain were included. The adequacy of daptomycin use was evaluated with respect to the indication, dosage, adjustments after microbiology results, switching to an oral agent and length of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 615 patients received daptomycin during the study week. The prevalence use was 2.3 patients / 100,000 inhabitants per week, 12.4 patients / 1000 admissions and 9.2 Days of Therapy (DOT) / 1000 hospital stays. These rates varied between hospitals: from 0 to 13.9 patients / 100,000 inhabitants, from 0 to 76.1 patients / 1000 admissions and from 0 to 49.4 DOT / 1000 hospital stays. The most frequent infections were bacteremia (31.6 %) and skin and soft tissue infections (17.9 %). Microbiological results were available in only 65.4 % of infections. The most frequent microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus (192 isolates, of which 87 were resistant to methicillin) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (124 isolates). A total of 136 prescriptions (22.1 %) were underdosed. Dosages < 8 mg/kg were used for 35.6 % of endovascular infections and for 26.2 % of osteoarticular infections. Overall, 57.2 % of prescriptions were not optimal in, at least, one item. Clinical cure rate was 76.1% and mortality attributable to the infection 8.1%. CONCLUSION: This is the first registry that identifies the prevalence of use of daptomycin in Spain and shows a high variability in the consumption between the different hospitals. Daptomycin underdosing was present in more than 20 % of cases.

REDS study: Retrospective effectiveness study of dalbavancin and other standard of care of the same IV antibiotic class in patients with ABSSSI.

OBJECTIVES: Acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a common source of morbidity in both the community and hospital settings. The current standard of care (SoC) requires multiple-dose intravenous (IV) regimens, which are associated with high hospitalisation rates, concomitant event risks and costs. Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide, long-acting antibiotic that is effective against Gram-positive microorganisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Dalbavancin allows treatment of ABSSSIs with a single-shot IV administration or once weekly for 2 weeks, enabling clinicians to treat patients in an outpatient setting or to shorten the length of hospital stay. METHODS: This multicentre, observational, retrospective study compared hospitalised patients who received dalbavancin and patients treated with the three most used IV antibiotics of the same or similar class: vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin. The primary outcome was the time to discharge after starting the study antibiotics. RESULTS: The primary endpoint, time to discharge from the study therapy start, was measured for both groups: the median number of days was 6.5 in the dalbavancin group vs. 11.0 days in the SoC group. Moreover, in subpopulations of patients receiving one or more concomitant antibiotics active for Gram-positives, MRSA and patients with the most prevalent comorbidity (i.e., diabetes), the advantage of dalbavancin in terms of length of stay was confirmed, with a halved time to discharge or more. Safety data on dalbavancin were consistent with data collected in clinical trials. No serious adverse drug reactions related to dalbavancin were reported and most of them were classified as skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. One serious ADR was reported for daptomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Although the analysis was only descriptive, it can be concluded that dalbavancin may enable a remarkable reduction in length of hospital stay, also confirming the clinical effectiveness and good safety profile demonstrated in clinical trials in a real-world setting.

[Efficacy and safety of daptomycin in the treatment of gram-positive infective endocarditis: a meta-analysis].

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of daptomycin in the treatment of gram-positive infective endocarditis (IE) systematically. Methods: China Biology Medicine Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP Database, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from the time of establishing databases to April 2022 to obtain relevant controlled and uncontrolled studies of daptomycin for gram-positive infective endocarditis, using key search terms ("daptomycin","gram-positive bacterial infections","endocarditis"). We performed literature screening according to inclusion/exclusion criteria, data extraction, and quality assessment, and performed random-effects meta-analyses for pooled results data using R software. Results: A total of 11 studies (including 13 articles) were included. The findings in the three controlled studies showed that in the treatment of staphylococcus aureus endocarditis, there was no statistically significant differences in in-hospital death risk (RR=0.66, 95%CI: 0.24-1.84, P=0.427) and 6-month death risk (RR=1.27, 95%CI: 0.75-2.14, P=0.374) for daptomycin versus anti-staphylococcal penicillin or vancomycin; in the treatment of enterococcal endocarditis, there was no statistically significant difference in death risk (both P>0.05) for daptomycin versus ampicillin combined with ceftriaxone (RR=0.39, 95%CI: 0.06-2.49) and ampicillin or vancomycin plus or minus gentamicin (RR=0.42, 95%CI: 0.05-3.36); and for daptomycin versus ampicillin or vancomycin combined with an aminoglycoside antibiotic, the differences in in-hospital death risk (RR=0.80, 95%CI: 0.11-5.83) and 6-month death risk (RR=0.47, 95%CI: 0.07-3.21) were not statistically significant(both P>0.05). In a cost-effectiveness study, daptomycin as first-line treatment could save the medical cost of 4 037 pounds per patient compared with vancomycin over a longer period of patient treatment. The results of the meta-analysis of uncontrolled studies showed that the mean clinical success rate of daptomycin for left-side endocarditis was 77% (95%CI: 70% to 83%; I2=28%), for MSSA-infective right-side endocarditis was 87% (95%CI: 73%-95%), and for MRSA-infective right-side endocarditis was 78% (95%CI: 38%-95%; I2=49%); while the mortality rate [mean mortality rate for left-side endocarditis was 13% (95%CI: 11%-17%; I2=0); the mortality rate for right-side endocarditis was reported in only 2 studies, 3% and 27%, respectively] or the rate of daptomycin-related adverse events (4%) was within the acceptable ranges for clinical practice. Conclusions: The death risk in the treatment of infective endocarditis with dattomycin is comparable to that of other antibiotics, and the clinical success rate is higher. Some efficacy may be achieved with daptomycin while other treatments are not effective in treating IE.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of standard- and high-dose daptomycin: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Standard doses of daptomycin at 4 and 6 mg/kg were used for the treatment of skin and soft tissue for infections and bacteraemia, respectively. However, increased doses of daptomycin are recommended for complicated infections by Gram-positive organisms. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using 4 databases. We compared treatment success between standard-dose (SD, 4-6 mg/kg) and high-dose (HD, >6 mg/kg) daptomycin in patients with all-cause bacteraemia, complicated bacteraemia, infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis and foreign body/prosthetic infection as the primary outcome. We also compared the success between SD and HD2 (≥8 mg/kg) daptomycin treatments in patients with these diseases as the secondary outcome. The incidence of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation was evaluated as safety. RESULTS: In patients with complicated bacteraemia and infective endocarditis, the treatment success was significantly lower in the SD group than in the HD group (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.76 and OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.82) and HD2 group (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.69 and OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.60), respectively. A significant difference was demonstrated only in the HD2 group in patients with bacteraemia, including simple infection. SD did not decrease the success rate for the treatment of osteomyelitis and foreign body/prosthetic infection. The incidence of elevated CPK was significantly lower in SD group than in HD group. CONCLUSION: SD daptomycin was associated with significantly lower treatment success than HD in patients with complicated bacteraemia/infective endocarditis. The CPK elevation should be considered in patients treated with high daptomycin doses.

Daptomycin-induced rhabdomyolysis complicated with acute gouty arthritis.

Rhabdomyolysis is a well-documented side effect of daptomycin and is associated with hyperuricemia. However, the occurrence of acute gouty arthritis secondary to rhabdomyolysis-induced hyperuricemia has not been reported. We report a case of a patient who presented with daptomycin-induced rhabdomyolysis prior to the usual 7-10-day administration period. This case was complicated with acute gouty arthritis after 7 days from the onset of rhabdomyolysis symptoms. Treatment consisted of fluid management with the addition of prednisone for gouty arthritis treatment given his poor kidney function. This report indicates the importance of early monitoring of creatine kinase levels in patients on daptomycin to prevent complications from rhabdomyolysis.

Clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of eosinophilic pneumonia associated with daptomycin

Objective: The association between daptomycin exposure and eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is mainly based on case reports. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and provide more evidence for better identify and management of daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia in clinical practice.MethodsLiterature from 1991 to October 31, 2021 on EP induced by daptomycin were collected for retrospective analysis.ResultsA total of 47 patients (40 male and 7 female) from 35 studies were included. The median age was 67 years (range 28–89), and 78.7% of patients were ≥60 years. Daptomycin was mainly used in patients undergoing osteoarticular infections (63.8%). Typical initial symptoms were fever (91.5%), cough (55.3%) and dyspnea (59.6%). The median onset time of symptom was 3 weeks. EP recurred in 14.9% of patients after the re-administration of daptomycin, and 57.1% of EP recurred within 24h. Most cases were accompanied by marked accumulation of eosinophils in peripheral (41 cases) and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (27 cases). The main radiological features were pulmonary infiltration, ground glass opacity or consolidation in CT/CXR. All patients had symptom resolution after discontinuation of daptomycin except for one patient died due to the progression of the primary disease, the median time to symptoms relief was 3 days. Corticosteroids have been shown to help symptoms relief in some cases (59.6%).ConclusionDaptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia is a rare and serious complication. Physicians should consider eosinophilic pneumonia as a differential diagnosis when receiving daptomycin therapy, particularly in elderly male patients. (AU)

Objetivo: La asociación entre la exposición a daptomicina y la neumonía eosinofílica (NE) se basa principalmente en informes de casos. El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar las características clínicas y proporcionar más evidencia para una mejor identificación y tratamiento de la NE inducida por daptomicina en la práctica clínica.MétodosSe recopiló literatura médica desde 1991 hasta el 31 de octubre de 2021 sobre NE inducida por daptomicina para un análisis retrospectivo.ResultadosSe incluyeron un total de 47 pacientes (40 hombres y 7 mujeres) de 35 estudios. La mediana de edad fue de 67 años (rango 28-89), y el 78,7% de los pacientes tenían≥60 años. La daptomicina se utilizó principalmente en pacientes con infecciones osteoarticulares (63,8%). Los síntomas iniciales típicos fueron fiebre (91,5%), tos (55,3%) y disnea (59,6%). La mediana del tiempo de aparición de los síntomas fue de 3 semanas. La NE reapareció en el 14,9% de los pacientes después de la readministración de daptomicina, y el 57,1% lo hizo dentro de las primeras 24h. La mayoría de los casos se acompañó de una marcada acumulación de eosinófilos en tejidos periféricos (91,1%)/pulmonares (7 casos) y/o líquido de lavado broncoalveolar (27 casos). Las principales características radiológicas fueron infiltración pulmonar, opacidad «en vidrio deslustrado» o consolidación en TC/CXR. Todos los pacientes tuvieron una resolución de los síntomas después de la interrupción de la daptomicina, excepto uno que falleció debido a la progresión de la enfermedad primaria; la mediana de tiempo hasta el alivio de los síntomas fue de 3 días. Se ha demostrado que los corticoides ayudan al alivio de los síntomas en algunos casos (59,6%).ConclusiónLa NE inducida por daptomicina es una complicación rara y grave. Los médicos deben considerar la NE como un diagnóstico diferencial cuando un paciente recibe tratamiento con daptomicina, particularmente en varones de edad avanzada. (AU)

Clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of eosinophilic pneumonia associated with daptomycin.

OBJECTIVE: The association between daptomycin exposure and eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is mainly based on case reports. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and provide more evidence for better identify and management of daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia in clinical practice. METHODS: Literature from 1991 to October 31, 2021 on EP induced by daptomycin were collected for retrospective analysis. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients (40 male and 7 female) from 35 studies were included. The median age was 67 years (range 28-89), and 78.7% of patients were ≥60 years. Daptomycin was mainly used in patients undergoing osteoarticular infections (63.8%). Typical initial symptoms were fever (91.5%), cough (55.3%) and dyspnea (59.6%). The median onset time of symptom was 3 weeks. EP recurred in 14.9% of patients after the re-administration of daptomycin, and 57.1% of EP recurred within 24h. Most cases were accompanied by marked accumulation of eosinophils in peripheral (41 cases) and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (27 cases). The main radiological features were pulmonary infiltration, ground glass opacity or consolidation in CT/CXR. All patients had symptom resolution after discontinuation of daptomycin except for one patient died due to the progression of the primary disease, the median time to symptoms relief was 3 days. Corticosteroids have been shown to help symptoms relief in some cases (59.6%). CONCLUSION: Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia is a rare and serious complication. Physicians should consider eosinophilic pneumonia as a differential diagnosis when receiving daptomycin therapy, particularly in elderly male patients.

Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of confirmed gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections in oncology patients.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin versus vancomycin on the management catheter-related bloodstream  nfections in oncology patients. METHOD: A retrospective study was carried out including all patients admitted  at the Medical Oncology Unit between 2010 and 2018 with positive blood  cultures confirmed catheter-related bloodstream infections due to gram- positive microorganism, who were treated with either vancomycin or  daptomycin. The primary end point was all cause 30-days mortality, 30-days  hospital readmission and length of hospital stay (length of hospital stay). Results: A total of 70 patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections were included in the present study: vancomycin was administered to  61.4% (n = 43) and daptomycin to 38.6% (n = 27) of  patients. 78.5% (n = 55) of isolated bacteria showed a vancomycin minimum  inhibitory concentration ≤ 1 µg/ml. No differences were observed  between the two groups of patients regarding the 30-day mortality rate rate  (32.6% [n = 14] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.797), the 30-day re-admission rate (30.2% [n = 13] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.957) or the length of  hospital stay (18.9 versus 16.5 days; p = 0.562). Nephrotoxicity rate was  equivalent in both groups: a 7% (n = 3) of vancomycin goup versus a 7.4% (n  = 2) of daptomycin group (p = 0.946). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that both antibiotics are equivalent in their  safety and effectiveness. Therefore, vancomycin should continue being the  treatment of chose for gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections,  in particular at hospital centres with a low prevalence of strains that show  diminished susceptibility to vancomycin.

OBJETIVO: Analizar la eficacia y seguridad de la daptomicina frente a la  vancomicina en el tratamiento de las infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a catéter vascular en pacientes oncológicos.Método: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó a los pacientes ingresados en la Unidad de Oncología-Médica entre 2010-2018 con infección del torrente sanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular causada por  grampositivos, y que fueron tratados con vancomicina o daptomicina. Como  objetivos principales se determinaron la tasa de mortalidad por todas las  causas a los 30 días, el reingreso hospitalario a los 30 días y la duración de la  estancia hospitalaria. RESULTADOS: El estudio incluyó 70 pacientes con infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a catéter vascular: el 61,4% (n = 43) recibió  vancomicina y el 38,6% (n = 27) daptomicina. El 78,5% (n = 55) de las  bacterias aisladas presentaron una concentración mínima inhibitoria de  vancomicina ≤ 1 µg/ml. No se observaron diferencias entre ambos grupos de  pacientes en cuanto a la tasa de mortalidad a 30 días (32,6% [n = 14]  frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,797), la tasa de reingreso a 30 días (30,2% [n  = 13] frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,957) o la duración de la hospitalización (18,9 frente a 16,5 días; p = 0,562). La tasa de nefrotoxicidad fue equivalente  en ambos grupos: 7% (n = 3) para vancomicina frente al 7,4% (n = 2) para  daptomicina (p = 0,946). CONCLUSIONES: Nuestros resultados muestran que ambos antibióticos son equivalentes en su seguridad y eficacia. Por ello, vancomicina debería seguir siendo el tratamiento de elección para la infección del torrente sanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular, especialmente en centros con  una baja prevalencia de cepas con una susceptibilidad disminuida a  ancomicina.

Data mining for adverse drug reaction signals of daptomycin based on real-world data: a disproportionality analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports on daptomycin's adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have been insufficient, often because of limited data. Pharmacovigilance risk signal detection is innovative and has been applied to the safety monitoring and reevaluation of drugs post-marketing. AIM: The study aimed to promote safe daptomycin prescribing by mining and evaluating the daptomycin ADR signals from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHOD: A disproportionality analysis (reporting odds ratio ROR and proportional reporting ratio PRR) was utilized for FAERS data mining from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2021 (the most recent quarterly data at the time of the study). Preferred Terms of ADR reports were categorized by System Organ Class (SOC) based on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. RESULTS: This study retrieved 12,221 cases within the reporting period. A total of 140 repetitive signals were obtained by ROR and PRR, of which 53 new ADR signals were not recorded in the drug labels/datasheets. The top three ADR reports were "blood creatine phosphokinase elevation" (ROR, 56.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 51.07-62.87, PRR 51.94), "eosinophilic pneumonia" (ROR 696.71, 95%CI 603.21-804.70, PRR 657.57), and "rhabdomyolysis" (ROR 22.85, 95%CI 19.94-26.18, PRR 21.83). The highest ROR of "antimicrobial susceptibility test resistant" was found at 9808.14. Reports of rare adverse events, such as "necrotizing fasciitis and compartment syndrome," have emerged. The significant SOCs were "Infections and Infestations" and "Investigations." CONCLUSION: New daptomycin ADR signals were detected. Clinicians should monitor these potential ADRs in patients receiving daptomycin.

Target Therapeutic Ranges of Anti-MRSA Drugs, Linezolid, Tedizolid and Daptomycin, and the Necessity of TDM.

The target therapeutic ranges of vancomycin, teicoplanin, and arbekacin have been determined, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is performed in clinical practice. However, TDM is not obligatory for daptomycin, linezolid, or tedizolid. In this study, we examined whether TDM will be necessary for these 3 drugs in the future. There was no significant difference in therapeutic effects on acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection between linezolid and tedizolid by meta-analysis. Concerning the therapeutic effects on pneumonia, the rate of effectiveness after treatment with tedizolid was significantly lower than with linezolid. With respect to safety, the incidences of gastrointestinal adverse events and blood/lymphatic system disorders related to tedizolid were significantly lower than those related to linezolid. Linezolid exhibits potent therapeutic effects on pneumonia, but the appearance of adverse reactions is indicated as a problem. There was a dose-dependent decrease in the platelet count, and the target trough concentration (Ctrough) was estimated to be 4-6 or 2-7 µg/mL in accordance with the patient's condition. The efficacy of linezolid may be obtained while minimizing the appearance of adverse reactions by performing TDM. The target therapeutic range of tedizolid cannot be achieved in immunocompromised or severe patients. Therefore, we concluded that TDM was unnecessary, considering step-down therapy with oral drugs, use in non-severe patients, and high-level safety. Concerning daptomycin, high-dose administration is necessary to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of ≥666 as an index of efficacy. To secure its safety, Ctrough (<20 µg/mL) monitoring is important. Therefore, TDM is necessary.

Influence of daptomycin doses on the outcomes of VRE bloodstream infection treated with high-dose daptomycin.

OBJECTIVES: The CLSI recommended high-dose daptomycin (8-12 mg/kg) for treating Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections (BSI). The current study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of increasing the daptomycin dose for VRE BSI patients receiving ≥8 mg/kg. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre prospective observational study of patients who received a ≥8 mg/kg dose of daptomycin for treatment of VRE BSI. The primary outcome was 28 day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 661 patients were included. The 28 day mortality rate was 45.1%. The survivors received higher doses of daptomycin than non-survivors (10.1 versus 9.8 mg/kg; P < 0.001). An increase in the daptomycin dose independently predicted lower mortality [adjusted OR (aOR) = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.73-0.99; P = 0.03]. Eighty-six survivors (23.7%) and 43 non-survivors (14.4%) received a ≥11 mg/kg dose of daptomycin (P = 0.003). The 8 to <11 and ≥11 mg/kg doses of daptomycin differed in the 28 day mortality in the higher MIC group (≥2 mg/L) (49.4% versus 33.3%; P = 0.004), but not in the lower MIC group (≤1 mg/L) (29.3% versus 29.4%; P = 0.99). A dose of ≥11 mg/kg was associated with a higher (3.9%) rate of highly elevated creatine kinase (>2000 U/L) compared with 1.1% with 8 to <11 mg/kg (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of daptomycin is dose dependent. A high daptomycin dose, especially at ≥11 mg/kg, improved survival in patients with VRE BSI, but was associated with highly elevated creatine kinase. We recommend a ≥11 mg/kg dose of daptomycin be considered for treatment of VRE BSI, particularly for isolates with higher MICs.

Association Between Statin Use and Daptomycin-related Musculoskeletal Adverse Events: A Mixed Approach Combining a Meta-analysis and a Disproportionality Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing concern about the association between the combined use of daptomycin (DAP) and statins and the occurrence of musculoskeletal adverse events (MAEs), but this remains controversial. This study aimed to clarify the association between statin use and DAP-related MAEs. METHODS: We used a mixed approach that combines 2 methodologies. First, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effects of statin use on DAP-related MAEs. Second, we conducted a disproportionality analysis using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) to further confirm the results of the meta-analysis and to examine the effect of each type of statin on DAP-related MAEs in a large population. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis, statin use significantly increased the incidence of DAP-related rhabdomyolysis (odds ratio [OR]: 3.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-10.26) but not DAP-related myopathy (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: .95-3.12). In the disproportionality analysis using the FAERS, the use of statin significantly increased the reporting OR (ROR) for DAP-related myopathy (ROR: 5.69; 95% CI: 4.31-7.51) and rhabdomyolysis (ROR: 5.77; 95% CI: 4.33-7.68). Atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin all increased the incidence of DAP-related myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. CONCLUSION: The mixed approach combining a meta-analysis and disproportionality analysis showed that statin use was associated with the occurrence of DAP-related rhabdomyolysis. The appropriate use of statins and DAP should be performed with careful consideration of its safety.