Eficacia de lidocaína 2 % y articaína 4 % al usar la técnica infraorbitaria modificada para incisivos y premolares maxilares / Efficacy of 2 % lidocaine and 4 % articaine with the modified infraorbital nerve block to anesthetize maxillary incisors and premolars

Se realizó un ensayo clínico, aleatorizado, en el cual se determinó la eficacia de la técnica infraorbitaria modificada al usar de Lidocaína 2 % y Articaína 4 %, para lograr anestesia pulpar exitosa en incisivos y premolares maxilares. Se realizó un estudio experimental, controlado doble ciego. 20 sujetos voluntarios recibieron 1,8 ml de Lidocaína 2 % y Articaína 4 % con epinefrina, en la técnica infraorbitaria modificada. Se utilizó un vitálometro para medir la anestesia pulpar exitosa en incisivos y premolares maxilares. El grado de anestesia pulpar fue considerada cuando el vitálometro alcanzó dos lecturas consecutivas a 80. Los participantes informaron además sobre anestesia de tejidos blandos y percepción de comodidad de dicha anestesia. Los datos se analizaron usando la prueba de Shapiro Wilk, Mann-Whitney y McNemar. Resultados: Se observó que en el 100 y 95 % de los incisivos centrales, no hubo anestesia pulpar exitosa para el grupo de Articaína y Lidocaína respectivamente (p=0,50). En el incisivo lateral, el 85 % y 90 % de los dientes presentaron igual comportamiento (p=0,698). El canino presentó anestesia pulpar exitosa en el 70 % de los casos para el grupo de Articaína y en el 40 % para Lidocaína, datos estadísticamente significativos (p=0,027). La anestesia de tejidos blandos fue del 100 % y el 60 % de los pacientes del grupo de articaína la refirieron como incomoda. Conclusiones. La técnica infraorbitaria modificada usando Articaína 4 % o Lidocaína al 2 % no es eficaz para lograr la anestesia pulpar en los incisivos centrales y laterales, demostrando tener una mejor tasa de éxito en caninos cuando se utiliza articaína. Los autores recomiendan anestesiar las ramas alveolares antero y medias superiores para lograr anestesia pulpar profunda en incisivos y premolares.

The aim of this study was to compare de degree of successful pulpal anesthesia in maxillary incisors and premolars applying the modified infraorbital anesthetic technique using 2 % lidocaine and 4 % articaine with epinephrine. An experimental study, controlled, double-blind was conducted. 20 volunteer subjects received 1.8 ml of 2 % lidocaine and 4 % articaine with epinephrine, in the modified infraorbital technique. An electric pulpal tester was used to measure the pulpal anesthesia in maxillary incisors and premolars. The participants informed the degree of pulpal anesthesia, soft tissue anesthesia and comfort. The data was analyzed using the Shapiro Wilk, Mann-Whitney and McNemar tests. The 100-85 % of non-anesthetized cases was observed in the central incisors (p=0.500) and 95 -90 % in the lateral incisors (p=0.500) for articaine and lidocaine respectively. At a level of canines the degree of successful pulpal anesthesia for the 4 % articaine group was 70 % and for 2 % lidocaine was 40 % (p=0.027), differences were statistically significant. At a level of first and second premolars, the degree of successful pulpal anesthesia for the 4 % articaine group was 85 % and for 2 % lidocaine was 75 %(p=0.347) The subjective incidence of the soft tissue anesthesia was 100 % and 60 % of the patients of the articaine group referred to it as uncomfortable. The modified infraorbital technique using 2 % lidocaine or 4% articaine is not effective to achieve pulpal anesthesia in central and lateral incisors, showing a better success rate in canines when using 4 % articaine. The authors recommend anesthetizing the anterior and middle superior alveolar branches to achieve successful anesthesia in incisors and premolars procedures.

Comparative Evaluation of Mental Incisal Nerve Block, Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block, and Their Combination on the Anesthetic Success Rate in Symptomatic Mandibular Premolars: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of mental incisive nerve block (MINB) and inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) that were given alone or in combination to provide anesthesia to symptomatic mandibular premolars. METHODS: One hundred fifty-three patients participated in this randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The patients were divided into 3 groups; first group received MINB with 2 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and a mock IANB with 2 mL sterile saline, patients in group 2 received mock MINB and an IANB with 2 mL 2% lidocaine, and patients in group 3 received both MINB and IANB with 2 mL each of 2% lidocaine. Access cavity preparation was initiated after 10 minutes. Success was defined as no pain or faint/weak/mild pain during endodontic access preparation and instrumentation. The anesthetic success rates were analyzed with Pearson χ(2) test at 5% significance levels. RESULTS: The MINB and IANB gave 53% and 47% anesthetic success rates, respectively, with no significant difference between them. Adding an IANB to MINB significantly improved the success rates to 82%. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of MINB and IANB can provide improved local anesthesia for symptomatic mandibular premolars.

Anesthetic Success of an Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Supplemental Articaine Buccal Infiltration for Molars and Premolars in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the anesthetic success of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block, and supplemental articaine buccal infiltration after a failed IAN block, in first and second molars and premolars in patients presenting with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. METHODS: As part of 6 studies, 375 emergency patients presenting with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis received 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine via an IAN block. After profound lip numbness, endodontic access and instrumentation were initiated. If the patient felt moderate to severe pain, a supplemental buccal infiltration of a cartridge of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was administered (204 patients), and endodontic treatment continued. Success was defined as the ability to access and instrument the tooth without pain (visual analogue scale rating of 0) or mild pain (visual analogue scale rating less than or equal to 54 mm). RESULTS: IAN block success was 28% for the first molars, 25% for the second molars, and 39% for the premolars. There were no significant differences when comparing molars with premolars. For the supplemental articaine buccal infiltration, success was 42% for the first molars, 48% for the second molars, and 73% for the premolars. There were no significant differences when comparing the molars, but there was a significant difference when comparing the premolars with the molars. CONCLUSIONS: For patients presenting with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, the success rates for the IAN block and supplemental buccal infiltration of articaine of the molars and premolars would not be high enough to ensure profound pulpal anesthesia.

Variation in Location of the Mandibular Foramen/Inferior Alveolar Nerve Complex Given Anatomic Landmarks Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scans.

INTRODUCTION: The inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injection is 1 of the most commonly administered and useful injections in the field of dentistry. Practitioners use intraoral anatomic landmarks, which vary greatly among patients. The objective of this study was to assist practitioners by identifying a range of normal variability within certain landmarks used in delivering IAN anesthesia. METHODS: A total of 203 randomly selected retrospective cone-beam computed tomographic scans were obtained from the Midwestern University Dental Institute cone-beam computed tomographic database. InVivoDental5.0 volumetric imaging software (Anatomage, San Jose, CA) was used to measure 2 important parameters used in locating the mandibular foramen (MF)/IAN complex: (1) the angle from the contralateral premolar contact area to the MF and (2) the distance above the mandibular occlusal plane to the center of the MF. The variation of these measurements was compared with established reference values and statistically analyzed using a 1-sample t test. RESULTS: The angle from the contralateral premolar contact area to the MF for the right and left sides was 42.99° and 42.57°, respectively. The angulations varied significantly from the reference value of 45° (P < .001). The minimum height above the mandibular occlusal plane for the right and left sides was 9.85 mm and 9.81 mm, respectively. The heights varied significantly from the minimum reference value of 6 mm but not the maximum reference value of 10 mm (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Orienting the syringe barrel at an angulation slightly less than 45° and significantly higher than 6 mm above the mandibular occlusal plane can aid in successfully administering anesthesia to the MF/IAN complex.

Does the combination of 3% mepivacaine plain plus 2% lidocaine with epinephrine improve anesthesia and reduce the pain of anesthetic injection for the inferior alveolar nerve block? A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

INTRODUCTION: In theory, using 3% mepivacaine initially for an inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block would decrease the pain of injection, provide faster onset, and increase anesthetic success. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained with a combination of 3% mepivacaine/2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) versus a combination of 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine)/2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) in IAN blocks. Injection pain was also studied. METHODS: One hundred asymptomatic subjects were randomly given a combination of a 1-cartridge volume of 3% mepivacaine plus a 1-cartridge volume of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and a combination of a 1-cartridge volume of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine plus a 1-cartridge volume of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for the IAN block at 2 separate appointments. Subjects rated the pain of injection. The molars, premolars, and incisors were tested with an electric pulp tester in 4-minute cycles for 60 minutes. Anesthetic success was defined as the subject achieving 2 consecutive 80 readings within 15 minutes after completion of the IAN blocks and sustaining the 80 reading for 60 minutes. RESULTS: Success was not significantly different (P > .05) between the 2 combinations. No statistical differences in injection pain or onset times were found. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 3% mepivacaine plus 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was equivalent to the combination of 2 cartridges of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in terms of injection pain, onset time, and pulpal anesthetic success for the IAN block.

Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence and morphological parameters of lingual concavity, and whether these factors are related to a higher risk of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury when performing an immediate implant surgery in posterior mandible region. METHODS: The CBCT images from 237 subjects (1008 teeth) were analysed the shape of the mandibles (C, P, U type), dimensional parameters of lingual concavity (angle, height, depth), and its relation to inferior alveolar canal (IAC) (A, B, C zone), RAC (distance from root apex to IAC) and probability of IAN injury. Multiple logistic regression modelling to determine the odds ratio of variables that made an important contribution to the probability of IAN injury and to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: The U type ridge (46.7%) and the most concave point located at C zone (48.8%) are most prevalent in this region. The mandibular second molar presents highest risk for IAN injury than other tooth type (p<0.001), which were 3.82 times to occur IAN injury than the mandibular second premolar. The concave point located at A zone and B zone were 7.82 and 3.52 times than C zone to have IAN damage, respectively. The probability of IAN injury will reduce 26% for every 1mm increase in RAC (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The tooth type, morphological features of lingual concavities, and RAC are associated with risks of IAN injury during immediate implant placement. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Pre-surgical mapping of the IAC and identification of its proximity relative to the lingual concavity in the posterior mandible regions may avoid unpleasant complications, specifically when performing immediate implant procedures.

Characteristics of dental pulp in human upper first premolar teeth based on immunohistochemical and morphometric examinations.

Teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons are commonly considered as healthy. Therefore, it is possible to examine structure of the dental pulp can be fully recognized and how it is affected by malocclusion. The aim of the study was to evaluate by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and morphometry dental pulp in human upper first premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons. The material comprised 36 teeth of 20 patients in the age range 16-26 years. By the use of IHC markers the presence of immunocompetent cells (CD20, CD45RO, and CD68), blood vessels (CD31) and nerves (PGP9.5) were examined in the pulp. Inflammatory infiltrates and tissue atrophy were observed in 24 and 10 teeth, respectively. Strong positive correlation between the width of the odontoblastic layer, the number of rows of odontoblast nuclei and the increase of MVA (microvessel area) in the pulp of atrophic teeth was found. The cellular infiltrations found in H&E-stained sections were identified by IHC as memory T cells (CD45RO+) and B lymphocytes (CD20+) with macrophages (CD68+) present at the periphery. The CD20 antigen was intensively expressed in 13 teeth, CD45RO in 33 teeth, and CD68 in 20 teeth. Thus, despite the lack of any clinical signs of pulp disease many teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons show focal pulp inflammation and atrophy which probably results from the malocclusion stress accompanying teeth crowding.

Effect of massage on the efficacy of the mental and incisive nerve block.

The purpose of this trial was to assess the effect of soft tissue massage on the efficacy of the mental and incisive nerve block (MINB). Thirty-eight volunteers received MINB of 2.2 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 80,000 epinephrine on 2 occasions. At one visit the soft tissue overlying the injection site was massaged for 60 seconds (active treatment). At the other visit the crowns of the mandibular premolar teeth were massaged (control treatment). Order of treatments was randomized. An electronic pulp tester was used to measure pulpal anesthesia in the ipsilateral mandibular first molar, a premolar, and lateral incisor teeth up to 45 minutes following the injection. The efficacy of pulp anesthesia was determined by 2 methods: (a) by quantifying the number of episodes with no response to maximal electronic pulp stimulation after each treatment, and (b) by quantifying the number of volunteers with no response to maximal pulp stimulation (80 reading) on 2 or more consecutive tests, termed anesthetic success. Data were analyzed by McNemar, Mann-Whitney, and paired-samples t tests. Anesthetic success was 52.6% for active and 42.1% for control treatment for lateral incisors, 89.5 and 86.8% respectively for premolars, and 50.0 and 42.1% respectively for first molars (P = .344, 1.0, and .508 respectively). There were no significant differences in the number of episodes of negative response to maximum pulp tester stimulation between active and control massage. A total of 131 episodes were recorded after both active and control massage in lateral incisors (McNemar test, P = 1.0), 329 (active) versus 316 (control) episodes in the premolars (McNemar test, P = .344), and 119 (active) versus 109 (control) episodes respectively for first molars (McNemar test, P = .444). Speed of anesthetic onset and discomfort did not differ between treatments. We concluded that soft tissue massage after MINB does not influence anesthetic efficacy.

Accessory neurovascular foramina on the lingual surface of mandible: incidence, topography, and clinical implications.

CONTEXT: It was suggested that the accessory neurovascular foramina of the mandible might be of significance in relation to the effectiveness of local anesthesia following the routine inferior alveolar nerve block. AIMS: To investigate the incidence of neurovascular foramina over the lingual surface of the mandible in South Indian population. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was conducted at the department of anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 67 human adult dry mandibles, the exact ages and sexes of which were not known. The location and number of neurovascular foramina were topographically analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The foramina were observed in 64 mandibles (95.5%) and were often multiple in most of the cases. They were located between the two medial incisors in 8 mandibles (1.9%), between the medial and lateral incisor in 34 mandibles (50.7%; 25-bilateral; 7-right; 2-left), between the lateral incisor and canine in 7 mandibles (10.4%; 2-bilateral; 3-right; 2-left), between the canine and first premolar in 6 cases (8.9%; 3 on each side). Foramina were also present around the genial tubercle in 56 mandibles (83.6%). Among them, 52 mandibles showed a single foramen just above the genial tubercle, 34 mandibles had foramina below the tubercles, 13 mandibles had foramina on the right side of genial tubercle and 17 were having on the left side. CONCLUSION: Since the anatomical details of these foramina are important to various fields of dentistry and oncology, the present investigation was undertaken. The clinical significance and implications are emphasized.

Pulsed Nd: YAG laser induces pulpal analgesia: a randomized clinical trial.

This double-blind, randomized, clinical trial investigated the effectiveness and underlying mechanism of neural inhibition of pulsed Nd:YAG laser induction of pulpal analgesia compared with 5% EMLA anesthetic cream. Forty-four paired premolars from 44 orthodontic patients requiring bilateral premolar extraction from either dental arch were randomly assigned to the 'Laser plus Sham-EMLA' or 'EMLA plus Sham-Laser' treatment group. Analgesia was tested by an Electric Pulp Tester (EPT) and the cutting of a standardized cavity, which was terminated when participants reported sensitivity, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and numbness were recorded. Statistical analyses were done by paired t test, McNemar's test, and a chi-squared test (p < 0.05). Sixty-eight percent of laser- and 59% of EMLA-treated teeth had completed cavities with statistically significant EPT increases above baseline. No significant within-patient differences were found for either group. No laser-treated participants reported numbness. The trial confirmed that the pulsed Nd:YAG laser effectively induced pulpal analgesia, by suppression of intradental nerve responses to electrical and mechanical stimuli. Such a laser provides an alternative for dental pain management (ANZ-Clinical Trial Registry: N12611001099910).

Effect of nitrous oxide on the efficacy of the inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

INTRODUCTION: The inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block does not always result in successful pulpal anesthesia. Anesthetic success rates might be affected by increased anxiety. Nitrous oxide has been shown to have both anxiolytic and analgesic properties. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to determine the effect of nitrous oxide on the anesthetic success of the IAN block in patients experiencing symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. METHODS: One hundred emergency patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular posterior tooth were enrolled in this study. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive an inhalation regimen of nitrous oxide/oxygen mix or room air/oxygen mix (placebo) 5 minutes before the administration of the IAN block. Endodontic access was begun 15 minutes after completion of the IAN block, and all patients had profound lip numbness. Success was defined as no or mild pain (visual analog scale recordings) on access or instrumentation. RESULTS: The success rate for the IAN block was 50% for the nitrous oxide group and 28% for the placebo group. There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: For mandibular teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, administration of 30%-50% nitrous oxide resulted in a statistically significant increase in the success of the IAN block compared with room air/oxygen.

Paresthesia during orthodontic treatment: case report and review.

Paresthesia of the lower lip is uncommon during orthodontic treatment. In the present case, paresthesia occurred during orthodontic leveling of an extruded mandibular left second molar. It was decided to remove this tooth from the appliance and allow it to relapse. A reanatomization was then performed by grinding. The causes and treatment options of this rare disorder are reviewed and discussed. The main cause of paresthesia during orthodontic treatment may be associated with contact between the dental roots and inferior alveolar nerve, which may be well observed on tomography scans. Treatment usually involves tooth movement in the opposite direction of the cause of the disorder.

Area extent anaesthesia from buccal nerve block.

This study investigated the extent of complete anaesthesia from buccal nerve block. 40 healthy Thai patients (20 males; 20 females) requiring buccal nerve block for surgery were studied. After the buccal nerve was blocked, the buccal mucosa was explored using a sharp probe to map out the extent of anaesthesia. The operation was carried out after inferior alveolar and lingual nerve block. The extent of the anaesthesia was mainly from the retromolar area to the second molar, followed by the first molar to the second premolar, whilst the first premolar to the central incisor was the area least affected. An important finding of this study was that the anaesthetized extent of some patients extended to the anterior region on the same quadrant. This study showed the affected areas of buccal nerve anaesthesia extended through the buccal mucosa from the first premolar to the central incisor in some patients. It can serve as another informative indication for lower anterior surgery.

The accuracy of identifying the greater palatine neurovascular bundle: a cadaver study.

BACKGROUND: The palate is a common site for harvesting subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG). The size of SCTG that can be harvested is dictated by the position of the greater palatine neurovascular bundle (GPB). The aims of this cadaver study are to assess the accuracy of predicting the location of the GPB on study models and to evaluate anatomic factors that might influence the predictability. METHODS: Eleven fully dentate or partially edentulous maxillary cadavers were used. Study models were fabricated after the greater palatine foramen was identified. The GPB was recognized after dissection, from which the distance to the cemento-enamel junction of the first molar and premolar was measured. Eight periodontists and twelve periodontal residents were asked to estimate the location of the GPB on the study models and the same measurements were taken. Comparisons of the estimated and true GPB position were performed. The correlation between the palatal vault height and the variability of detecting the GPB was investigated. RESULTS: The most frequent greater palatine foramen location was between the second and third molars (66.6%). For most cases, there was an underestimation of the location of the GPB up to 4 mm. The interexaminer variability was positively correlated with the vault height. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated location of the GPB was commonly closer to the cemento-enamel junction of posterior teeth. Agreement on the location of the GPB was lowered with the presence of high palatal vaults. The results of this study could assist clinicians in planning the location for harvesting SCTG on the hard palate.

Evaluation of sensitivity of teeth after mandibular fractures.

The sensitivity of teeth anterior to a fracture between the mental and mandibular foramina has been tested and followed up until reinnervation or 3 years has passed. This study assessed the reinnervation period, the number of denervated teeth, and their clinical importance. Fifty patients and 459 teeth were examined. Two hundred and seventy-three teeth were affected and had potentially impaired innervation. Tests after injury showed non-responsive teeth in 81% of affected teeth. Six weeks after injury, 19% of teeth were reinnervated; by 1 year after injury, 92% of initially non-responsive teeth were reinnervated. Most teeth (34%) were reinnervated from 6 weeks to 3 months. All 23/186 initially non-responsive, unaffected, contralateral corresponding teeth were reinnervated within 6 weeks. A year after injury, 95% of incisors, 91% of canines, 94% of premolars, and 82% of molars were reinnervated. Three years after injury, 8% of teeth remain denervated. During the second and third years, no reinnervation occurred, but clinical signs of pulp devitalisation of denervated teeth occurred in 18% or 1% of the initially non-responsive affected teeth. The results revealed the stability of pulp 1 year after injury. Denervated teeth should not be treated if no clinical or radiological signs of devitalisation exist.

Histology and intramandibular course of the inferior alveolar nerve.

The morphology of the inferior alveolar nerve is a very important factor for all surgical procedures in the mandibular region. The aim of this anatomical and histological study was to describe the intramandibular course and the microscopic histology of the inferior alveolar nerve in the dissected human cadaver. Twenty partially dentulous hemimandible specimens from human cadavers were dissected and embalmed, and the findings were interpreted by standard and histological imaging. The result of this study showed that the inferior alveolar nerve comprises two larger nerves that are separately wrapped in perineural sheaths and spirally twisted around each other. The mental nerve exits through the mental foramen in the premolar region and the dental nerve continues from the premolar region as the incisive nerve in the incisive canal. These findings provide relevant data for clinical dentistry, especially when planning oral and dental operative treatment procedures in the mandibular region.

A comparison of the anterior middle superior alveolar nerve block and infraorbital nerve block for anesthesia of maxillary anterior teeth.

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a study to compare the efficacy of the anterior middle superior alveolar (AMSA) nerve block with that of the infra-orbital nerve block (IONB) in achieving pulpal anesthesia in the anterior maxilla. METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy adult volunteers received 1.0 milliliter of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine as an AMSA nerve block or IONB via computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) across two visits. The authors used electronic pulp testing to measure pulpal anesthesia. Participants provided subjective reports of lip numbness and injection discomfort. The authors analyzed the data by using the McNemar, Mann-Whitney and t tests. RESULTS: Anesthetic success, defined as two or more consecutive episodes of no sensation in response to maximal stimulation, was significantly greater with the AMSA nerve block than with the IONB in central (P = .012) and lateral (P < .001) incisors; however, anesthesia was achieved in only 42.9 percent of central incisors with the AMSA nerve block. The authors observed a significantly greater number of episodes of no response in the premolar and canine teeth after IONB. Onset of anesthesia was shorter after IONB in canines (P = .002) and central incisors (P = .022). The incidence of subjective lip numbness was 100 percent after IONB and 14.3 percent after AMSA nerve block (P < .001), with numbness lasting twice as long after IONB (P = .019). The authors noted no significant difference in injection discomfort between the two techniques (P = .768). CONCLUSIONS: The IONB produced anesthetic success in canine and premolar teeth, with a more rapid onset than that for the AMSA nerve block. Although the AMSA technique was significantly more successful than IONB in attaining incisor anesthesia, it was ineffective for central incisors, as assessed according to rigorous electronic pulp testing. The IONB and AMSA nerve block produced similar levels of injection discomfort.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the maxillary high tuberosity second division nerve block.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine in the maxillary high tuberosity second division nerve block. METHODS: Fifty subjects randomly received maxillary high tuberosity second division nerve blocks by using 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 3.6 mL of 3% mepivacaine at 2 separate appointments spaced at least 1 week apart. The anterior, premolar, and molar teeth were pulp tested in 4-minute cycles for a total of 60 minutes. Success was defined as no subject response to 2 consecutive 80 readings with the electric pulp tester. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The high tuberosity approach to the maxillary second division nerve block with both anesthetic formulations resulted in a high success rate (92%-98%) for the first and second molars. Approximately 76%-78% of the second premolars were anesthetized with both anesthetic formulations. Both anesthetic formulations were ineffective for the anterior teeth and first premolars. The use of 3% mepivacaine provided a significantly shorter duration of pulpal anesthesia than 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in the molars and premolars.

A comparison of the local anesthetic efficacy of the extraoral versus the intraoral infraorbital nerve block.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of the extraoral infraorbital nerve block has not been studied sufficiently to ensure its appropriate clinical use. To compare the local anesthetic efficacy of the extraoral versus the intraoral infraorbital nerve block, the authors conducted a prospective, randomized crossover study. METHODS: Forty adult participants randomly received extraoral infraorbital nerve blocks of 1.8 milliliters of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine at one appointment and intraoral infraorbital nerve blocks of 1.8 mL of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine at another appointment in a crossover design. After administering the injections, the authors used an electric pulp tester to assess the maxillary central and lateral incisors, canine, premolars and first molar for pulpal anesthesia in four-minute cycles for 60 minutes. They considered anesthesia to be successful when the participant had no response to two consecutive 80 readings (the maximum output) with the electric pulp tester. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that the extraoral and intraoral infraorbital nerve blocks were ineffective in providing profound pulpal anesthesia of the maxillary central incisor (15 percent success rate) and lateral incisor (22 percent success rate). The pulpal anesthesia success rate was 92 percent for the canine for both types of nerve blocks, 80 to 90 percent for first and second premolars and 65 to 70 percent for the first molar, with no significant differences (P < .05) between the two nerve blocks. Pulpal anesthesia did not last for an hour in any of the teeth. Needle insertion pain and postoperative sequelae were more common after the extraoral infraorbital nerve block was administered. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Both nerve blocks would be ineffective in the central and lateral incisors. Both nerve blocks would be somewhat successful in the canine and premolars but not in the first molar.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the intraoral, infraorbital nerve block.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine, and 3% mepivacaine in the intraoral, infraorbital nerve block. METHODS: Forty subjects randomly received intraoral, infraorbital nerve blocks by using a cartridge of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 or 1:50,000 epinephrine and a cartridge of 3% mepivacaine at 3 separate appointments spaced at least 1 week apart. The anteriors, premolars, and first molar were pulp tested in 4-minute cycles for a total of 60 minutes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The intraoral, infraorbital nerve block was ineffective in providing profound pulpal anesthesia of the maxillary central incisor, lateral incisor, and first molar. Successful pulpal anesthesia of the canine and first and second premolars ranged from 75%-92% by using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine. However, pulpal anesthesia did not last for 60 minutes. The use of 3% mepivacaine provided a shorter duration of anesthesia than the lidocaine formulations with epinephrine in the canines and premolars.