Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 685
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410713, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728030

RESUMO

Importance: Older adults with socioeconomic disadvantage develop a greater burden of disability after critical illness than those without socioeconomic disadvantage. The delivery of in-hospital rehabilitation that can mitigate functional decline may be influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH). Whether rehabilitation delivery differs by SDOH during critical illness hospitalization is not known. Objective: To evaluate whether SDOH are associated with the delivery of skilled rehabilitation during critical illness hospitalization among older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study linked with Medicare claims (2011-2018). Participants included older adults hospitalized with a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data were analyzed from August 2022 to September 2023. Exposures: Dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid, education, income, limited English proficiency (LEP), and rural residence. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was delivery of physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT) during ICU hospitalization, characterized as any in-hospital PT or OT and rate of in-hospital PT or OT, calculated as total number of units divided by length of stay. Results: In the sample of 1618 ICU hospitalizations (median [IQR] patient age, 81.0 [75.0-86.0] years; 842 [52.0%] female), 371 hospitalizations (22.9%) were among patients with dual Medicare and Medicaid eligibility, 523 hospitalizations (32.6%) were among patients with less than high school education, 320 hospitalizations (19.8%) were for patients with rural residence, and 56 hospitalizations (3.5%) were among patients with LEP. A total of 1076 hospitalized patients (68.5%) received any PT or OT, with a mean rate of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.02) units/d. After adjustment for age, sex, prehospitalization disability, mechanical ventilation, and organ dysfunction, factors associated with lower odds of receipt of PT or OT included dual Medicare and Medicaid eligibility (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.50-0.97]) and rural residence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48-0.87]). LEP was associated with a lower rate of PT or OT (adjusted rate ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.32-0.94]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings highlight the need to consider SDOH in efforts to promote rehabilitation delivery during ICU hospitalization and to investigate factors underlying inequities in this practice.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Medicare , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Masculino , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estado Terminal/reabilitação , Estudos de Coortes , Terapia Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410269, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748424

RESUMO

Importance: The impact of cumulative exposure to neighborhood factors on psychosis, depression, and anxiety symptom severity prior to specialized services for psychosis is unknown. Objective: To identify latent neighborhood profiles based on unique combinations of social, economic, and environmental factors, and validate profiles by examining differences in symptom severity among individuals with first episode psychosis (FEP). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used neighborhood demographic data and health outcome data for US individuals with FEP receiving services between January 2017 and August 2022. Eligible participants were between ages 14 and 40 years and enrolled in a state-level coordinated specialty care network. A 2-step approach was used to characterize neighborhood profiles using census-tract data and link profiles to mental health outcomes. Data were analyzed March 2023 through October 2023. Exposures: Economic and social determinants of health; housing conditions; land use; urbanization; walkability; access to transportation, outdoor space, groceries, and health care; health outcomes; and environmental exposure. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences 15-item, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. Results: The total sample included 225 individuals aged 14 to 36 years (mean [SD] age, 20.7 [4.0] years; 152 men [69.1%]; 9 American Indian or Alaska Native [4.2%], 13 Asian or Pacific Islander [6.0%], 19 Black [8.9%], 118 White [55.1%]; 55 Hispanic ethnicity [26.2%]). Of the 3 distinct profiles identified, nearly half of participants (112 residents [49.8%]) lived in urban high-risk neighborhoods, 56 (24.9%) in urban low-risk neighborhoods, and 57 (25.3%) in rural neighborhoods. After controlling for individual characteristics, compared with individuals residing in rural neighborhoods, individuals residing in urban high-risk (mean estimate [SE], 0.17 [0.07]; P = .01) and urban low-risk neighborhoods (mean estimate [SE], 0.25 [0.12]; P = .04) presented with more severe psychotic symptoms. Individuals in urban high-risk neighborhoods reported more severe depression (mean estimate [SE], 1.97 [0.79]; P = .01) and anxiety (mean estimate [SE], 1.12 [0.53]; P = .04) than those in rural neighborhoods. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that in a cohort of individuals with FEP, baseline psychosis, depression, and anxiety symptom severity differed by distinct multidimensional neighborhood profiles that were associated with where individuals reside. Exploring the cumulative effect of neighborhood factors improves our understanding of social, economic, and environmental impacts on symptoms and psychosis risk which could potentially impact treatment outcomes.


Assuntos
Transtornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Transtornos Psicóticos/psicologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Adulto , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Estudos de Coortes , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Características da Vizinhança , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Cancer Control ; 31: 10732748241255538, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736171

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Promoting cancer preventive behaviors among adolescents, especially those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, is crucial due to the significant impact of health behaviors in adolescence on disease risk in adulthood. With India witnessing a rise in cancer incidence and mortality, adolescence becomes a pivotal stage for establishing healthy habits, emphasizing the need for early cancer prevention efforts. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used survey data from 2242 adolescents attending public schools of Mumbai, India. Multiple logistic regression was conducted to determine the associations between cancer preventive behaviors and: (1) the individual and social determinants of health, and (2) media exposure. FINDINGS: Merely 21.5% of the adolescents ate fruits and vegetables daily, 50% of the adolescents exercised 3 or more times a week, and 20% of the adolescents admitted having used tobacco and/or supari. Girls were found to have lower odds of exercising, as well as using tobacco and/or supari. Wealth and father's education were positively associated with all 3 cancer preventive behaviors. Media exposure was negatively associated, with television exposure linked to reduced fruits and vegetables consumption, while movies and social media exposure were associated with increased tobacco and/or supari use. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that individual and social determinants of health and media exposure can influence cancer preventive health behaviors in low socio-economic status (SES) adolescents. Efforts to increase awareness to promote cancer preventive behaviors among the adolescents, particularly low SES adolescents, a population more vulnerable to poor health outcomes, is critical.


This study investigates factors that can influence cancer preventive behaviors among low socioeconomic status (SES) adolescents, focusing on dietary habits, physical activity, and avoidance of tobacco and areca nut. Our study gathered data from an underrepresented population of India, which is more vulnerable to poor health outcomes and have less access to health care. Our findings can alert public health officials, policy makers and non-governmental organizations to target this population and customize their intervention strategies to promote health and prevent cancer.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Neoplasias , Humanos , Adolescente , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Índia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Comunicação , Exercício Físico , Comportamento do Adolescente/psicologia
4.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 40(1): 127, 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717712

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is suspected to have worse outcomes when length of illness prior to presentation is prolonged. Our objective was to evaluate how social determinants of health influence medical care and outcomes for babies with IHPS. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed over 10 years. Census data were used as proxy for socioeconomic status via Geo-Identification codes and correlated with food access and social vulnerability variables. The cohort was subdivided to understand the impact of Medicaid Managed Care (MMC). RESULTS: The cohort (279 cases) was divided into two groups; early group from 2011 to 2015 and late from 2016 to 2021. Cases in the late group were older at the time of presentation (41.5 vs. 36.5 days; p = 0.022) and presented later in the disease course (12.8 vs. 8.9 days; p = 0.021). There was no difference in race (p = 0.282), gender (p = 0.874), or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who presented with IHPS after implementation of phased MMC were older, had a longer symptomatic course, and shorter pylorus measurements. Patients with public insurance after the implementation of MMC were more likely to follow-up with an outpatient pediatrician within a month of hospitalization. These results suggest that MMC may have improved access to care for infants with IHPS.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro , Estenose Pilórica Hipertrófica , Humanos , Estenose Pilórica Hipertrófica/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Lactente , Estados Unidos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e248584, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669015

RESUMO

Importance: The benefit of adding social determinants of health (SDOH) when estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk is unclear. Objective: To examine the association of SDOH at both individual and area levels with ASCVD risks, and to assess if adding individual- and area-level SDOH to the pooled cohort equations (PCEs) or the Predicting Risk of CVD Events (PREVENT) equations improves the accuracy of risk estimates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included participants data from 4 large US cohort studies. Eligible participants were aged 40 to 79 years without a history of ASCVD. Baseline data were collected from 1995 to 2007; median (IQR) follow-up was 13.0 (9.3-15.0) years. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to February 2024. Exposures: Individual- and area-level education, income, and employment status. Main outcomes and measures: ASCVD was defined as the composite outcome of nonfatal myocardial infarction, death from coronary heart disease, and fatal or nonfatal stroke. Results: A total of 26 316 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 61.0 [9.1] years; 15 494 women [58.9%]; 11 365 Black [43.2%], 703 Chinese American [2.7%], 1278 Hispanic [4.9%], and 12 970 White [49.3%]); 11 764 individuals (44.7%) had at least 1 adverse individual-level SDOH and 10 908 (41.5%) had at least 1 adverse area-level SDOH. A total of 2673 ASCVD events occurred during follow-up. SDOH were associated with increased risk of ASCVD at both the individual and area levels, including for low education (individual: hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.25-1.55]; area: HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.20-1.42]), low income (individual: 1.35 [95% CI, 1.25-1.47]; area: HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.17-1.40]), and unemployment (individual: HR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.24-2.10]; area: HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.14-1.37]). Adding area-level SDOH alone to the PCEs did not change model discrimination but modestly improved calibration. Furthermore, adding both individual- and area-level SDOH to the PCEs led to a modest improvement in both discrimination and calibration in non-Hispanic Black individuals (change in C index, 0.0051 [95% CI, 0.0011 to 0.0126]; change in scaled integrated Brier score [IBS], 0.396% [95% CI, 0.221% to 0.802%]), and improvement in calibration in White individuals (change in scaled IBS, 0.274% [95% CI, 0.095% to 0.665%]). Adding individual-level SDOH to the PREVENT plus area-level social deprivation index (SDI) equations did not improve discrimination but modestly improved calibration in White participants (change in scaled IBS, 0.182% [95% CI, 0.040% to 0.496%]), Black participants (0.187% [95% CI, 0.039% to 0.501%]), and women (0.289% [95% CI, 0.115% to 0.574%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, both individual- and area-level SDOH were associated with ASCVD risk; adding both individual- and area-level SDOH to the PCEs modestly improved discrimination and calibration for estimating ASCVD risk for Black individuals, and adding individual-level SDOH to PREVENT plus SDI also modestly improved calibration. These findings suggest that both individual- and area-level SDOH may be considered in future development of ASCVD risk assessment tools, particularly among Black individuals.


Assuntos
Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Medição de Risco/métodos , Aterosclerose/epidemiologia
6.
Cancer Control ; 31: 10732748241249896, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38680117

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is a frequent type of malignancy with a steadily increasing incidence rate worldwide. Although NMSC was shown to be associated with diabetes, no studies have addressed the extent to which insulin use influences the risk of NMSC in light of social determinants of health (SDOH). We conducted a quantitative study that examined the interplay between insulin use, SDOH, additional covariates, and NMSC among individuals with diabetes. METHODS: We based our analysis on the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a national survey conducted yearly in the US. We performed weighted chi-squared test, logistic regression, and survival analyses on 8685 eligible participants with diabetes enrolled in the BRFSS. RESULTS: Kaplan Meier survival curves showed higher probability of NMSC event-free survival for participants with diabetes using insulin compared to participants with diabetes not using insulin (log-rank test P < .001). Significant associations were detected between insulin use and reduced odds of NMSC (OR .56; 95% CI: .38-.82), and decreased hazard (HR .36; 95% CI: .21-.62), along with indices of SDOH. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that socioeconomic differences related to the healthcare system and behavioral patterns are linked to discrepancies in the use of insulin and the development of NMSC.


Assuntos
Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Insulina , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier
7.
Psychiatry Res ; 336: 115894, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598946

RESUMO

Social determinants of health (SDoH) have been linked to a higher likelihood of experiencing mental health problems. This study aimed to investigate whether the accumulation of unfavorable SDoH is associated with depression symptom. Data was gathered from a representative population participating in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey spanning from 2005 to 2018. Self-reported SDoH were operationalized according to the criteria outlined in Healthy People 2030, with a cumulative measure of unfavorable SDoH calculated for analysis. The presence of depression symptom was identified using the Patient Health Questionnaire in a representative sample of 30,762 participants (49.2 % males) representing 1,392 million non-institutionalized U.S. adults, with 2,675 (8.7 %) participants showing depression symptom. Unfavorable SDoH were found to be significantly and independently associated with depression symptom. Individuals facing multiple unfavorable SDoHs were more likely to experience depression symptom (P for trend < 0.001). For instance, a positive association was observed in participants exposed to six or more unfavorable SDoHs with depression symptom (AOR = 3.537, 95 % CI: 1.781, 7.075, P-value < 0.001). The findings emphasize that the likelihood of developing depression symptom significantly increases when multiple SDoHs are present, compared to just a single SDoH.


Assuntos
Depressão , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adolescente
8.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 540, 2024 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684955

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common types of cancer that affects women's reproductive system. The risk of endometrial cancer is associated with biologic, behavioral and social determinants of health (SDOH). The focus of the work is to investigate the cumulative effect of this cluster of covariates on the odds of endometrial cancer that heretofore have only been considered individually. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative study using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) national data collected in 2020. Data analysis using weighted Chi-square test and weighted logistic regression were carried out on 84,118 female study participants from the United States. RESULTS: Women with diabetes mellitus were approximately twice as likely to have endometrial cancer compared to women without diabetes (OR 1.54; 95%CI: 1.01-2.34). Biologic factors that included obesity (OR 3.10; 95% CI: 1.96-4.90) and older age (with ORs ranging from 2.75 to 7.21) had a significant increase in the odds of endometrial cancer compared to women of normal weight and younger age group of 18 to 44. Among the SDOH, attending college (OR 1.83; 95% CI: 1.12-3.00) was associated with increased odds of endometrial cancer, while renting a home (OR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.28-0.88), having other arrangements (OR 0.05; 95% CI: 0.02-0.16), being divorced (OR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.30-0.99), and having higher incomes ranging from $35,000 to $50,000 (OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.16-0.78), and above $50,000 (OR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14-0.62), were all associated with decreased odds of endometrial cancer. As for race, Black women (OR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.84) and women of other races (OR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15-0.88) were shown to have lower odds of endometrial cancer compared to White women. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed the importance of adopting a comprehensive approach to the study of the associated factors of endometrial cancer by including social, biologic, and behavioral determinants of health. The observed social inequity in endometrial cancer among women needs to be addressed through effective policies and changes in social structures to advocate for a standardized healthcare system that ensures equitable access to preventive measures and quality of care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias do Endométrio/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Adolescente , Fatores de Risco , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/complicações , Fatores Socioeconômicos
9.
World J Surg ; 48(5): 1004-1013, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The association of an individual's social determinants of health-related problems with surgical outcomes has not been well-characterized. The objective of this study was to determine whether documentation of social determinants of a health-related diagnosis code (Z code) is associated with postoperative outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included surgical cases from a single institution's national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) clinical registry from October 2015 to December 2021. The primary predictor of interest was documentation of a Z code for social determinants of health-related problems. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included postoperative length of stay, disposition, and 30-day postoperative mortality, reoperation, and readmission. Multivariable regression models were fit to evaluate the association between the documentation of a Z code and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 10,739 surgical cases, 348 patients (3.2%) had a documented social determinants of health-related Z code. In multivariable analysis, documentation of a Z code was associated with increased odds of morbidity (20.7% vs. 9.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-2.53), length of stay (median, 3 vs. 1 day; incidence rate ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.33-1.67), odds of disposition to a location other than home (11.3% vs. 3.9%; aOR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.89-4.33), and odds of readmission (15.3% vs. 6.1%; aOR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.45-2.73). CONCLUSIONS: Social determinants of health-related problems evaluated using Z codes were associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Improved documentation of social determinants of health-related problems among surgical patients may facilitate improved risk stratification, perioperative planning, and clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Adulto , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade
10.
JAMA ; 331(7): 592-600, 2024 02 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497697

RESUMO

Importance: Residential evictions may have increased excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To estimate excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic for renters who received eviction filings (threatened renters). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used an excess mortality framework. Mortality based on linked eviction and death records from 2020 through 2021 was compared with projected mortality estimated from similar records from 2010 through 2016. Data from court records between January 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021, were collected via the Eviction Lab's Eviction Tracking System. Similar data from court records between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016, also collected by the Eviction Lab, were used to estimate projected mortality during the pandemic. We also constructed 2 comparison groups: all individuals living in the study area and a subsample of those individuals living in high-poverty, high-filing tracts. Exposures: Eviction filing. Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause mortality in a given month. The difference between observed mortality and projected mortality was used as a measure of excess mortality associated with the pandemic. Results: The cohort of threatened renters during the pandemic period consisted of 282 000 individuals (median age, 36 years [IQR, 28-47]). Eviction filings were 44.7% lower than expected during the study period. The composition of threatened renters by race, ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic characteristics during the pandemic was comparable with the prepandemic composition. Expected cumulative age-standardized mortality among threatened renters during this 20-month period of the pandemic was 116.5 (95% CI, 104.0-130.3) per 100 000 person-months, and observed mortality was 238.6 (95% CI, 230.8-246.3) per 100 000 person-months or 106% higher than expected. In contrast, expected mortality for the population living in similar neighborhoods was 114.6 (95% CI, 112.1-116.8) per 100 000 person-months, and observed mortality was 142.8 (95% CI, 140.2-145.3) per 100 000 person-months or 25% higher than expected. In the general population across the study area, expected mortality was 83.5 (95% CI, 83.3-83.8) per 100 000 person-months, and observed mortality was 91.6 (95% CI, 91.4-91.8) per 100 000 person-months or 9% higher than expected. The pandemic produced positive excess mortality ratios across all age groups among threatened renters. Conclusions and Relevance: Renters who received eviction filings experienced substantial excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Instabilidade Habitacional , Mortalidade , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/mortalidade , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
11.
Burns ; 50(4): 823-828, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492980

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aims to establish the significance of social determinants of health and prevalent co-morbidities on multiple indicators for quality of care in patients admitted to the Burn and Surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of population group data for patients admitted at the Burn and Surgical ICU from January 1, 2016, to November 18, 2019. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), mortality, 30-day readmission, and hospital charges. Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables were used to compare population health groups. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 487 burn and 510 surgical patients. When comparing ICU patients, we observed significantly higher mean hospital charges and length of stay (LOS) in BICU v. SICU patients with a history of mental health ($93,259.40 v. $50,503.36, p = 0.013 and 16.28 v. 9.16 days, p = 0.0085), end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD) ($653,871.05 v. $75,746.35, p = 0.0047 and 96.15 v. 17.53 days, p = 0.0104), sepsis ($267,979.60 v. $99,154.41, p = <0.001 and 39.1 v. 18.42 days, p = 0.0043), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) ($757,740.50 v. $117,816.40, p = <0.001 and 93.11 v. 20.21 days, p = 0.002). Also, higher mortality was observed in burn patients with ESRD, ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), sepsis, VTE, and diabetes mellitus. 30-day-readmissions were greater among burn patients with a history of mental health, drug dependence, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides new insights into the variability of outcomes between burn patients treated in different critical care settings, underlining the influence of comorbidities on these outcomes. By comparing burn patients in the BICU with those in the SICU, we aim to highlight how differences in patient backgrounds, including the quality of care received, contribute to these outcomes. This comparison underscores the need for tailored healthcare strategies that consider the unique challenges faced by each patient group, aiming to mitigate disparities in health outcomes and healthcare spending. Further research to develop relevant and timely interventions that can improve these outcomes.


Assuntos
Queimaduras , Comorbidade , Estado Terminal , Tempo de Internação , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Queimaduras/economia , Queimaduras/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estado Terminal/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Sepse/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar
12.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 561, 2024 Feb 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38388342

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the UK, unique and unforeseen factors, including COVID-19, Brexit, and Ukraine-Russia war, have resulted in an unprecedented cost of living crisis, creating a second health emergency. We present, one of the first rapid reviews with the aim of examining the impact of this current crisis, at a population level. We reviewed published literature, as well as grey literature, examining a broad range of physical and mental impacts on health in the short, mid, and long term, identifying those most at risk, impacts on system partners, including emergency services and the third sector, as well as mitigation strategies. METHODS: We conducted a rapid review by searching PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and HMIC (2020 to 2023). We searched for grey literature on Google and hand-searched the reports of relevant public health organisations. We included interventional and observational studies that reported outcomes of interventions aimed at mitigating against the impacts of cost of living at a population level. RESULTS: We found that the strongest evidence was for the impact of cold and mouldy homes on respiratory-related infections and respiratory conditions. Those at an increased risk were young children (0-4 years), the elderly (aged 75 and over), as well as those already vulnerable, including those with long-term multimorbidity. Further short-term impacts include an increased risk of physical pain including musculoskeletal and chest pain, and increased risk of enteric infections and malnutrition. In the mid-term, we could see increases in hypertension, transient ischaemic attacks, and myocardial infarctions, and respiratory illnesses. In the long term we could see an increase in mortality and morbidity rates from respiratory and cardiovascular disease, as well as increase rates of suicide and self-harm and infectious disease outcomes. Changes in behaviour are likely particularly around changes in food buying patterns and the ability to heat a home. System partners are also impacted, with voluntary sectors seeing fewer volunteers, an increase in petty crime and theft, alternative heating appliances causing fires, and an increase in burns and burn-related admissions. To mitigate against these impacts, support should be provided, to the most vulnerable, to help increase disposable income, reduce energy bills, and encourage home improvements linked with energy efficiency. Stronger links to bridge voluntary, community, charity and faith groups are needed to help provide additional aid and support. CONCLUSION: Although the CoL crisis affects the entire population, the impacts are exacerbated in those that are most vulnerable, particularly young children, single parents, multigenerational families. More can be done at a community and societal level to support the most vulnerable, and those living with long-term multimorbidity. This review consolidates the current evidence on the impacts of the cost of living crisis and may enable decision makers to target limited resources more effectively.


Assuntos
Qualidade Habitacional , Saúde da População , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , União Europeia , Hipertensão , Saúde da População/estatística & dados numéricos , Suicídio , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Economia , Ambiente Domiciliar , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(2): 172-180, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315921

RESUMO

This article examines racial and ethnic disparities in the relationship between gentrification and exposure to contextual determinants of health. In our study, we focused on changes in selected contextual determinants of health (health care access, social deprivation, air pollution, and walkability) and life expectancy during the period 2006-21 among residents of gentrifying census tracts in six large US cities that have experienced different gentrification patterns and have different levels of segregation: Chicago, Illinois; Los Angeles, California; New York, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; San Francisco, California; and Seattle, Washington. We found that gentrification was associated with overall improvements in the likelihood of living in Medically Underserved Areas across racial and ethnic groups, but it was also associated with increased social deprivation and reduced life expectancy among Black people, Hispanic people, and people of another or undetermined race or ethnicity. In contrast, we found that gentrification was related to better (or unchanged) contextual determinants of health for Asian people and White people. Our findings can inform policies that target communities identified to be particularly at risk for worsening contextual determinants of health as a result of gentrification.


Assuntos
Etnicidade , Desigualdades de Saúde , Segregação Residencial , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Philadelphia/epidemiologia , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Expectativa de Vida/etnologia , Expectativa de Vida/tendências , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/etnologia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos
14.
Laryngoscope ; 134(6): 2848-2856, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38197538

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Social determinants of health (SDH) are nonmedical, societal factors that influence health. There is limited information on the current relationship between SDH and hearing loss (HL) in the United States. This study aims to compare the odds of HL among US adults by race/ethnicity, education level, income-to-poverty level ratio, health insurance coverage, and health care access. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The 2015-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data were analyzed to compare odds ratios (ORs) for HL, defined as pure tone average over 25 dB HL in at least one ear, by SDH categories using sample weights. Adjusted ORs were calculated using logistic regression models controlling for sex, age, race/ethnicity, education level, income-to-federal-poverty level, health care insurance coverage and access, and loud noise, pesticide, and cigarette exposure. RESULTS: A total of 6028 participants were included. Non-Hispanic Black participants had half the odds of HL as Non-Hispanic White participants (OR 0.52, p < 0.05). Lower education level correlated with higher odds of HL: those without a high school diploma had double the odds of HL compared with college graduates or above (OR 2.05, 1.91, p < 0.05). The income-to-federal-poverty level ratio of 1.3 to less than 2 had higher odds of HL than the 4+ group (OR 1.45, p < 0.05). Use of multiple health care locations was associated with nearly three times the odds of HL than the group using one location (OR 2.87, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SDH are associated with HL. Further investigation is needed into the mechanism of disparities for targeted prevention and treatment for hearing care equity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Laryngoscope, 134:2848-2856, 2024.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva , Cobertura do Seguro , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Perda Auditiva/epidemiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Razão de Chances , Escolaridade , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
JAMA ; 331(2): 124-131, 2024 01 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193961

RESUMO

Importance: The End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) model randomly selected 30% of US dialysis facilities to receive financial incentives based on their use of home dialysis, kidney transplant waitlisting, or transplant receipt. Facilities that disproportionately serve populations with high social risk have a lower use of home dialysis and kidney transplant raising concerns that these sites may fare poorly in the payment model. Objective: To examine first-year ETC model performance scores and financial penalties across dialysis facilities, stratified by their incident patients' social risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study of 2191 US dialysis facilities that participated in the ETC model from January 1 through December 31, 2021. Exposure: Composition of incident patient population, characterized by the proportion of patients who were non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, living in a highly disadvantaged neighborhood, uninsured, or covered by Medicaid at dialysis initiation. A facility-level composite social risk score assessed whether each facility was in the highest quintile of having 0, 1, or at least 2 of these characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of home dialysis, waitlisting, or transplant; model performance score; and financial penalization. Results: Using data from 125 984 incident patients (median age, 65 years [IQR, 54-74]; 41.8% female; 28.6% Black; 11.7% Hispanic), 1071 dialysis facilities (48.9%) had no social risk features, and 491 (22.4%) had 2 or more. In the first year of the ETC model, compared with those with no social risk features, dialysis facilities with 2 or more had lower mean performance scores (3.4 vs 3.6, P = .002) and lower use of home dialysis (14.1% vs 16.0%, P < .001). These facilities had higher receipt of financial penalties (18.5% vs 11.5%, P < .001), more frequently had the highest payment cut of 5% (2.4% vs 0.7%; P = .003), and were less likely to achieve the highest bonus of 4% (0% vs 2.7%; P < .001). Compared with all other facilities, those in the highest quintile of treating uninsured patients or those covered by Medicaid experienced more financial penalties (17.4% vs 12.9%, P = .01) as did those in the highest quintile in the proportion of patients who were Black (18.5% vs 12.6%, P = .001). Conclusions: In the first year of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' ETC model, dialysis facilities serving higher proportions of patients with social risk features had lower performance scores and experienced markedly higher receipt of financial penalties.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica , Reembolso de Incentivo , Diálise Renal , Autocuidado , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/etnologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Econômicos , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/métodos , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Listas de Espera , Autocuidado/economia , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Am J Epidemiol ; 193(2): 277-284, 2024 Feb 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37771041

RESUMO

Black women in the United States have the highest incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and are disproportionately burdened by its adverse sequalae, compared with women of all racial and ethnic groups. Segregation, a key driver of structural racism for Black families, can provide information critical to understanding these disparities. We examined the association between racial and economic segregation at 2 points and incident HDP using intergenerationally linked birth records of 45,204 Black California-born primiparous mothers (born 1982-1997) and their infants (born 1997-2011), with HDP ascertained from hospital discharge records. Women's early childhood and adulthood neighborhoods were categorized as deprived, mixed, or privileged based on the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (a measure of concentrated racial and economic segregation), yielding 9 life-course trajectories. Women living in deprived neighborhoods at both time points experienced the highest odds of HDP (from mixed effect logistic regression, unadjusted odds ratio = 1.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.13, 1.40) compared with women living in privileged neighborhoods at both time points. All trajectories involving residence in a deprived neighborhood in early childhood or adulthood were associated with increased odds of HDP, whereas mixed-privileged and privileged-mixed trajectories were not. Future studies should assess the causal nature of these associations.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez , Características da Vizinhança , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Segregação Social , Disparidades Socioeconômicas em Saúde , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Gravidez , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , California/epidemiologia , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/economia , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/epidemiologia , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/etnologia , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/etiologia , Acontecimentos que Mudam a Vida , Características de Residência , Estados Unidos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
Matern Child Health J ; 28(1): 125-134, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37955840

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) pregnant people face barriers to health and healthcare that put them at risk of pregnancy complications. Rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among Indigenous pregnant people are estimated to be twice that of non-Hispanic White (NHW) pregnant people. METHODS: Race-corrected Oregon Hospital Discharge and Washington Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System data were combined to create a joint dataset of births between 2012 and 2016. The analytic sample was composed of 12,535 AI/AN records and 313,046 NHW records. A multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between community-level, individual and pregnancy risk factors on SMM for AI/AN pregnant people. RESULTS: At the community level, AI/AN pregnant people were more likely than NHW to live in mostly or completely rural counties with low median household income and high uninsured rates. They were more likely to use Medicaid, be in a high-risk age category, and have diabetes or obesity. During pregnancy, AI/AN pregnant people were more likely to have insufficient prenatal care (PNC), gestational diabetes, and pre-eclampsia. In the multilevel model, county accounted for 6% of model variance. Hypertension pre-eclampsia, and county rurality were significant predictors of SMM among AI/AN pregnant people. High-risk age, insufficient PNC and a low county insured rate were near-significant at p < 0.10. DISCUSSION: Community-level factors are significant contributors to SMM risk for AI/AN pregnant people in addition to hypertension and pre-eclampsia. These findings demonstrate the need for targeted support in pregnancy to AI/AN pregnant people, particularly those who live in rural and underserved communities.


What is already known on this subject? American Indian and Alaska Native pregnant people face higher rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality, and the risk is exacerbated for rural Indigenous pregnant people.What this study adds? This publication uses a multilevel model to assess the contribution of community-level factors in severe maternal morbidity risk for American Indian and Alaska Native pregnant people. This analysis highlights the important role that rurality, prenatal care adequacy and access to insurance play in maternal morbidity risk and discusses how those risks are disproportionately felt by American Indian and Alaska Native pregnant people in the Pacific Northwest.


Assuntos
Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca , Complicações na Gravidez , Características de Residência , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Nativos do Alasca/estatística & dados numéricos , Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/etnologia , Indígenas Norte-Americanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/etnologia , Washington , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/etnologia , Complicações na Gravidez/etiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Noroeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/etnologia , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(3): 487-496, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37874478

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the association between race/ethnicity and all-cause mortality among women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer who received systemic therapy. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Cancer Database on women diagnosed with advanced-stage ovarian cancer from 2004 to 2015 who received systemic therapy. Race/ethnicity was categorized as Non-Hispanic (NH) White, NH-Black, Hispanic, NH-Asian/Pacific Islander, and Other. Income and education were combined to form a composite measure of socioeconomic status (SES) and categorized into low-, mid-, and high-SES. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess whether race/ethnicity was associated with the risk of death after adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment factors. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted by SES, age, and surgery receipt. RESULTS: The study population comprised 53,367 women (52.4% ages ≥ 65 years, 82% NH-White, 8.7% NH-Black, 5.7% Hispanic, and 2.7% NH-Asian/Pacific Islander) in the analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the NH-Black race was associated with a higher risk of death versus NH-White race (aHR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.07,1.18), while Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a lower risk of death compared to NH-White women (aHR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.80, 0.95). Furthermore, NH-Black women versus NH-White women had an increased risk of mortality among those with low-SES characteristics (aHR:1.12; 95% CI:1.03-1.22) and mid-SES groups (aHR: 1.13; 95% CI:1.05-1.21). CONCLUSIONS: Among women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer who received systemic therapy, NH-Black women experienced poorer survival compared to NH-White women. Future studies should be directed to identify drivers of ovarian cancer disparities, particularly racial differences in treatment response and surveillance.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Disparidades Socioeconômicas em Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/etnologia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/mortalidade , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/terapia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/etnologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Nativo Asiático-Americano do Havaí e das Ilhas do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
Psychiatry Res ; 330: 115560, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37956588

RESUMO

Racism is a social determinant of mental health which has a disproportionally negative impact on the experiences of psychiatric inpatients of color. Distinct differences in the physical space and clinical settings of two inpatient buildings at a hospital system in the tristate (New York, New Jersey, Connecticut) area of the United States led to the present investigation of racial inequities in the assignment of patients to specific buildings and units. Archival electronic medical record data were analyzed from over 18,000 unique patients over a period of six years. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were conducted with assigned building (old vs. new building) as the binary outcome variable. Non-Hispanic White patients were set as the reference group. Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Asian patients were significantly less likely to be assigned to better resourced units in the new building. When limiting the analysis to only general adult units, Black and Hispanic/Latinx patients were significantly less likely to be assigned to units in the new building. These results suggest ethnoracial inequities in patient assignment to buildings which differed in clinical and physical conditions. The findings serve as a call to action for hospital systems to examine the ways in which structural racism impact clinical care.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais Psiquiátricos , Racismo , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Adulto , Humanos , População Negra , Hispânico ou Latino , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/etnologia , Grupos Raciais/psicologia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Racismo/etnologia , Racismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Hospitais Psiquiátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Brancos , Asiático , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Int J Equity Health ; 22(1): 219, 2023 10 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37848883

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had major ramifications for health and the economy at both the individual and collective levels. This study examined exogenous negative changes in household income and their implications on psychological well-being (PWB) among the Chinese population during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were drawn from the early China COVID-19 Survey, a cross-sectional anonymous online survey administered to the general population in China. Self-reported PWB was measured using a 5-point Likert scale with five questions related to the participants' recent psychological state. Hierarchical multiple linear regression was employed to examine whether income loss during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with poor psychological health. RESULTS: This study included 8,428 adults, of which 90% had suffered from a moderate or severe loss of household income due to the early COVID-19 pandemic. Those who had experienced moderate or severe loss of income scored significantly lower on psychological well-being than those who did not experience income loss (19.96 or 18.07 vs. 21.46; P < 0.001); after controlling for confounders, income loss was negatively associated with PWB scores (moderate income loss: B = - 0.603, P < 0.001; severe income loss: B = - 1.261, P < 0.001). An interaction effect existed between the degree of income loss and pre-pandemic income groups. Specifically, participants in the middle-income group who had suffered severe income loss scored the lowest on PWB (B = - 1.529, P < 0.001). There was also a main effect on income loss, such that participants with varying degrees of income loss differed across five dimensions, including anhedonia, sleep problems, irritability or anger, difficulty with concentration, and repeated disturbing dreams related to COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Income loss during the pandemic has had detrimental consequences on psychological well-being, and the magnitude of the impact of income loss on psychological well-being varied according to previous income levels. Future policy efforts should be directed toward improving the psychological well-being of the economically vulnerable and helping them recover from lost income in the shortest time possible.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , População do Leste Asiático , Estresse Financeiro , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/etnologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , População do Leste Asiático/psicologia , População do Leste Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Bem-Estar Psicológico , Renda , Estresse Financeiro/economia , Estresse Financeiro/epidemiologia , Estresse Financeiro/etnologia , Estresse Financeiro/psicologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Mental/economia , Saúde Mental/etnologia , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...