The potential of dimetindene maleate inducing resistance to blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae through activating the salicylic acid signaling pathway in rice plants.

BACKGROUND: Rice blast disease (Magnaporthe oryzae) is considered the most destructive rice disease all over the world. Dimetindene maleate is used in medication against allergic reactions in humans. Dimetindene maleate used to induce systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in order to protect rice plants from blast disease. RESULTS: Dimetindene maleate was not effective against fungus linear growth in vitro. In glasshouse conditions, dimetindene maleate significantly improved resistance at 25, 50, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 mg L-1 concentrations. Leaf blast severity reached 14.18% on plants treated with the most effective concentration of 125 mg L-1 compared with control plants. In field conditions during both seasons (2016 and 2017), 125 mg L-1 dimetindene maleate decreased the disease severity to 1.1% and 2.7%, respectively, after 30 days of treatment. Also, grain yield was increased to 13.27 and 12.90 t ha-1 in 2016 and 2017 seasons, respectively. Moreover, dimetindene maleate induces some of the indicators for salicylic acid and jasmonic acid pathways via gene expression. These genes include OsWRKY45, OsNPR1, AOS2, JAMYB and PBZ1 (OsPR10), recording 15.14-, 16.47-, 5.3-, 5.37- and 5.1-fold changes, respectively, 12-h postinoculation. CONCLUSION: The results overview investigated the effectiveness of dimetindene maleate for increasing rice resistance to blast disease through inducing SAR in rice plants under glasshouse and field conditions, which could be through the SA defense pathway by expression of genes (OsWRKY45 and OsNPR1). © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

Etv5 safeguards trophoblast stem cells differentiation from mouse EPSCs by regulating fibroblast growth factor receptor 2.

Previous studies have demonstrated that transcription factor Etv5 plays an important role in the segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm at the second fate decision of early embryo. However, it remains elusive whether Etv5 functions in the segregation between inner cell mass and trophectoderm at the first cell fate decision. In this study, we firstly generated Etv5 knockout mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) by CRISPR/Cas9, then converted them into extended potential stem cells (EPSCs) by culturing the cells in small molecule cocktail medium LCDM (LIF, CHIR99021, (S)-(+)-dimethindene maleate, minocycline hydrochloride), and finally investigated their differentiation efficiency of trophoblast stem cells (TSCs). The results showed that Etv5 knockout significantly decreased the efficiency of TSCs (CDX2+) differentiated from EPSCs. In addition, Etv5 knockout resulted in higher incidence of the differentiated cells with tetraploid and octoploid than that from wild type. Mechanistically, Etv5 was activated by extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway; in turn, Etv5 had a positive feedback on the expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) which lies upstream of ERK. Etv5 knockout decreased the expression of FGFR2, whose binding with fibroblast growth factor 4 was essentially needed for TSCs differentiation. Collectively, the findings in this study suggest that Etv5 is required to safeguard the TSCs differentiation by regulating FGFR2 and provide new clues to understand the specification of trophectoderm in vivo.

Derivation of Pluripotent Stem Cells with In Vivo Embryonic and Extraembryonic Potency.

Of all known cultured stem cell types, pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) sit atop the landscape of developmental potency and are characterized by their ability to generate all cell types of an adult organism. However, PSCs show limited contribution to the extraembryonic placental tissues in vivo. Here, we show that a chemical cocktail enables the derivation of stem cells with unique functional and molecular features from mice and humans, designated as extended pluripotent stem (EPS) cells, which are capable of chimerizing both embryonic and extraembryonic tissues. Notably, a single mouse EPS cell shows widespread chimeric contribution to both embryonic and extraembryonic lineages in vivo and permits generating single-EPS-cell-derived mice by tetraploid complementation. Furthermore, human EPS cells exhibit interspecies chimeric competency in mouse conceptuses. Our findings constitute a first step toward capturing pluripotent stem cells with extraembryonic developmental potentials in culture and open new avenues for basic and translational research. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Permeability alterations after surgical trauma in normal rabbit peritoneum.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether surgical trauma in a rabbit adhesion formation model and the administration of normal saline (N/S), icodextrin (ID) and/or dimetindene maleate (DM) changes the permeability of the normal rabbit parietal peritoneum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 female rabbits were operated on for adhesion formation and were euthanized 10 days later. In some rabbits, ID or N/S was instilled intraabdominally during operation, whereas in others DM was infused intravenously. In others, ID plus DM or no agent was used. Specimens were obtained postoperatively and were mounted between Ussing chambers. Amiloride was used to investigate Na(+) channels. Transmesothelial resistance (R(TM)) was determined as a permeability indicator. RESULTS: Amiloride increased the R(TM) of both surfaces. Surgical trauma increased R(TM) and partially inhibited the effect of amiloride. ID and N/S increased R(TM) and inhibited the effect of amiloride. Use of DM did not change R(TM) and did not inhibit the effect of amiloride. Use of ID plus DM slightly increased R(TM), but the effect of amiloride was blocked. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical trauma impairs the permeability of the normal rabbit parietal peritoneum. ID or N/S surmounted this effect, but DM did not, suggesting that surgical trauma is a diffuse process. Antiadhesion measures influence peritoneal physiology.

CD203c-based basophil activation test in allergy diagnosis: characteristics and differences to CD63 upregulation.

BACKGROUND: The basophil activation test (BAT) based on CD203c upregulation has been validated as a reliable tool for the diagnosis of IgE-mediated allergies. Nevertheless, CD203c-based BAT is hardly comparable with that of CD63-based tests, as the mechanisms of CD203c versus CD63 induction differ considerably. The aim of the present study was to identify potent influencing factors of the CD203c-based BAT and to emphasize differences between CD63 and CD203c detection. METHODS: CD203c-based BAT was determined in 82 healthy controls and in 79 allergic patients. The effects of interleukin (IL)-3 and degranulation enhancing substances were investigated and compared with CD63 upregulation. Furthermore, the influence of different storage conditions and incubation times was evaluated and the impact of antiallergic drugs on the test results was assessed. RESULTS: CD203c and CD63 expression was rapidly upregulated reaching a maximum after 20-30 min. Basophil CD203c upregulation assayed after storage times up to 48 h declined already after 4 h. IL-3 treatment increased CD203c and CD63 baseline levels and decreased basophil CD203c responses in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, cytochalasin B and latrunculin B did not affect CD203c responses but decreased CD63-based BAT. Finally, therapeutic concentrations of dimetindene and desloratadine did not affect CD203c upregulation. CONCLUSION: CD203c-based basophil activation test should be performed preferentially within 4 h after taking the blood samples. Priming and degranulation-enhancing factors are not required for CD203c-based BAT. In contrast to skin testing, CD203c-based BAT can be performed in patients undergoing antiallergic treatment. © 2010 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Characterization of novel selective H1-antihistamines for clinical evaluation in the treatment of insomnia.

Analogues of the known H(1)-antihistamine R-dimethindene were profiled as potential agents for the treatment of insomnia. Several highly selective compounds were efficacious in rodent sleep models. On the basis of overall profile, indene 1d and benzothiophene 2a had pharmacokinetic properties suitable for evaluation in night time dosing. Compound 2a did not show an in vivo cardiovascular effect from weak hERG channel inhibition.

Analytical method for simultaneously measuring ex vivo drug receptor occupancy and dissociation rate: application to (R)-dimethindene occupancy of central histamine H1 receptors.

We introduce a novel experimental method to determine both the extent of ex vivo receptor occupancy of administered compound and its dissociation rate constant (k4). [Here, we reference k4 as the rate of offset of unlabeled ligand in convention with Motulsky and Mahan (1)]. We derived a kinetic rate equation based on the dissociation rate constant for an unlabeled compound competing for the same site as a labeled compound and describe a model to simulate fractional occupancy. To validate our model, we performed in vitro kinetics and ex vivo occupancy experiments in rat cortex with varying concentrations of (R)-dimethindene, a sedating antihistamine. Brain tissue was removed at various times post oral administration, and histamine H1 receptor ligand [3H]-doxepin binding to homogenates from drug-treated or vehicle-treated rats was measured at multiple time points at room temperature. Fractional occupancy and k4 for (R)-dimethindene binding to H1 receptors were calculated by using our proposed model. Rats dosed with 30 and 60 mg/kg (R)-dimethindene showed 42% and 67% occupancy of central H1 receptors, respectively. These results were comparable to occupancy data determined by equilibrium radioligand binding. In addition, drug k4 rate determined by using our ex vivo method was equivalent to k4 determined by in vitro competition kinetics (dissociation half-life t(1/2) approximately 30 min). The outlined method can be used to assess, by simulation and experiment, occupancy for compounds based on dissociation rate constants and contributes to current efforts in drug optimization to profile antagonist efficacy in terms of its kinetic drug-target binding parameters. Data described by the method may be analyzed with commercially available software. Suggested fitting procedures are given in the appendix.

The basophil activation test in the diagnosis of allergy: technical issues and critical factors.

BACKGROUND: The basophil activation test (BAT) is a widely validated and reliable tool especially for the diagnosis of hymenoptera venom allergy. Nevertheless, several pitfalls have to be considered and outcomes may differ because of diverse in-house protocols and commercially available kits. We aimed to identify the factors that may influence results of the CD63-based BAT. METHODS: Basophil responses to monoclonal anti-IgE (clone E124.2.8) and bee and wasp venom were determined by BAT based on CD63. The effect of stimulating factors such as, IL-3, cytochalasin B and prewarming of the samples was investigated. Furthermore, we compared two different flow cytometer systems and evaluated the influence of storage time, different staining protocols and anti-allergic drugs on the test results. RESULTS: Interleukin-3 enhanced the reactivity of basophils at 300 pM, but not at 75 and 150 pM. Prewarming of samples and reagents did not affect basophil reactivity. CD63 expression assayed after storage time of up to 48 h showed that basophil reactivity already started to decline after 4 h. Basophils stained with HLA-DR-PC5 and CD123-PE antibodies gated as HLA-DR(neg)/CD123(pos) cells showed the highest reactivity. No effect on test outcomes was observed at therapeutic doses of dimetindene and desloratadine. Finally, slight differences in the percentage of activated basophils, depending on the cytometer system used, were found. CONCLUSION: Basophil activation test should be performed as early as possible after taking the blood sample, preferably within 4 h. In contrast to the skin test, BAT can be performed in patients undergoing treatment with antihistamines. For reasons of multiple influencing factors, BAT should be performed only at validated laboratories.

Antimuscarinic agents exhibit local inhibitory effects on muscarinic receptors in bladder-afferent pathways.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential of antimuscarinic agents for sensory mechanisms in overactive bladder using intravesical instillation. METHODS: Antimuscarinic agents were instilled intravesically in rats using two protocols. In the high-dose protocol, 5 mg atropine, oxybutynin, and dimethindene (M2-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist) were instilled into the bladder, and cystometric parameters, such as bladder capacity, intercontraction interval, pressure threshold, and maximal voiding pressure were monitored. In the low-dose protocol, 0.1 and 0.5 mug/mL oxybutynin, trospium, tolterodine, and dimethindene were continuously infused into the bladder. The doses chosen were based on the calculated urine-excreted concentrations of trospium typically achieved from human oral treatment of 40 mg/day. The effect of carbachol with and without the low-dose agents was then assessed. RESULTS: With the high-dose protocol, bladder capacity, intercontraction interval, and pressure threshold were increased when atropine and oxybutynin were instilled, but not when dimethindene was used. The maximal voiding pressure was not affected by any of the agents tested. In the low-dose protocol, none of the cystometric parameters were altered with antimuscarinic agents alone. The intercontraction interval decreased with intravesical carbachol (65% +/- 0.1% compared with baseline), but this was prevented with concomitant antimuscarinic agents. CONCLUSIONS: We have separated the local inhibitory effects of antimuscarinic agents during the storage phase from a decrease in voiding pressure. Intravesical instillation of antimuscarinic agents at clinically meaningful concentrations also suppressed carbachol-induced bladder overactivity. Antimuscarinic agents may be effective in treating overactive bladder, not only by suppression of muscarinic receptor-mediated detrusor muscle contractions, but also by blocking muscarinic receptors in bladder-afferent pathways.

Premedication with H1 and H2 blocking agents reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing anaesthesia and surgery frequently complain about postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Whether pretreatment with H1 and H2 blocking agents reduces the incidence of PONV remains controversial. To answer this question, we performed a randomised, prospective, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of a premedication with H1 and H2 receptor antagonists. MATERIAL AND SUBJECTS: 1149 patients (both sexes) undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to three treatment groups and one control group. Patients in the treatment groups were premedicated with the following H1 + H2 receptor antagonists:Group 1 (n = 335): 5 mg/kg cimetidine i.v. + 0.1 mg/kg dimetindene i.v. 20 min before induction of anaesthesiaGroup 2 (n = 337): 1.25 mg/kg ranitidine i.v. + 0.1 mg/kg dimetindene i.v. 20 min before induction of anaesthesiaGroup 3 (n = 316): 300 mg ranitidine p.o. + 0.1 mg/kg dimetindene i.v. 1 to 2 h before induction of anaesthesiaGroup 4 (n = 161): 20 ml saline solution i.v. 20 min before induction of anaesthesiaPatients from the treatment groups 1, 2 and 3 received regional or general anaesthesia depending on the clinical decision. All control patients received general anaesthesia consisting of fentanyl, a thiobarbiturate, enflurane, nitrous oxide, oxygen, and vecuronium. RESULTS: The incidence of nausea and vomiting was 8.5%, 6.8% and 5.4% in patients from the treatment groups (1, 2 and 3) who underwent general anaesthesia (n = 545), with no statistically significant differences between groups. The incidence of nausea and vomiting in the control group (n = 161) was 28.3% (nausea) and 27.5% (vomiting), respectively. In patients who underwent regional anaesthesia (n = 443), the incidence of nausea and vomiting was 2.5% and 1.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with H1 and H2 blocking agents significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Structure-activity relationships of dimethindene derivatives as new M2-selective muscarinic receptor antagonists.

A series of 2,3-disubstituted indenes, which are analogues of the widely used histamine H(1) receptor antagonist dimethindene, have been synthesized and studied as muscarinic and histamine receptor antagonists. The affinities of these compounds for the five human muscarinic receptor subtypes (M(1)-M(5)) and for human histamine H(1) receptors were determined in radioligand binding studies using membranes from transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine ([(3)H]NMS). The results demonstrate that the diisopropyl analogue 19 has a similar high affinity as (S)-dimethindene at M(2) receptors ((S)-dimethindene: pK(i) = 7.52; (-)-19: pK(i) = 7.37) with an improved selectivity pattern ((S)-dimethindene: M(2)/M(1) = 6-fold, M(2)/M(3) = 5-fold, M(2)/M(4) = 10-fold, M(2)/M(5) = 25-fold; (-)-19: M(2)/M(1) = 36-fold, M(2)/M(3) = 96-fold, M(2)/M(4) = 42-fold, M(2)/M(5) = 275-fold). In addition, compound (-)-19 showed 35-fold lower affinity at histamine H(1) receptors (pK(i) = 5.61) than (S)-dimethindene (pK(i) = 7.16). Another interesting compound is the fluoroethyl derivative 20 (pK(i)/M(2) = 7.49), which also exhibits a higher M(2) selectivity (M(2)/M(1) = 19-fold; M(2)/M(3) = 22-fold; M(2)/M(4) = 13-fold; M(2)/M(5) = 62-fold) than (S)-dimethindene. Unfortunately, compound 20 also shows a high affinity for histamine H(1) receptors (pK(i) = 8.14). The compound with the highest affinity for M(2) receptors (pK(i) = 7.91), the dimethylaminomethylene analogue 31, displayed only a small preference for M(2) receptors. In conclusion, compound (-)-19 might be useful to test the hypothesis that blockade of muscarinic M(2) receptors in the brain is a viable mechanism by which to produce improved cognition. This second-generation dimethindene analogue might also be the starting point for the development of M(2)-selective muscarinic antagonists useful for quantifying M(2) receptors in the central nervous system with positron emission tomography imaging.

Histamine release in mesenteric traction syndrome during abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: prophylaxis with H1 and H2 antihistamines.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Mesenteric traction syndrome is described as sudden tachycardia, hypotension and flush. Among other etiological factors eventeration or mesenteric traction of the small intestine may cause histamine release from mesenteric mast cells. We hypothesized that mesenteric traction syndrome may be positively influenced by prophylactic antihistamine administration. METHODS: Male patients (n = 17, ASA groups III-IV, 48-78 years old) were investigated in a randomised double blind study during elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Eight patients had pre-anaesthetic prophylaxis with dimetindene (H1-receptor antagonist) plus cimetidine (H2-receptor antagonist), 9 patients received placebo. Anaesthesia and invasive haemodynamic monitoring were standardised in all patients. Haemodynamic parameters, plasma histamine concentrations and clinical symptoms were determined 1 min after skin incision, as well as 5 and 20 min after mesenteric traction. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student's t-test, Chi2-test for incidences and Mann-Whitney-U-test for continuous data. RESULTS: The incidence of histamine release was 55.5% (5/9) in the placebo group vs. 37.5% (3/8) in the antihistamine group (p > 0.05, Chi2-test). Plasma histamine levels (mean +/- SD) were higher in the placebo group than in the antihistamine group at 5 and 20 min after mesenteric traction but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Arrhythmias were significantly more frequent in the placebo group (6 times) than in the antihistamine group (none) (p = 0.005 Chi2-test). Systolic blood pressure was not statistically different between groups (e.g. 5 min after mesenteric traction, mean +/- SD; placebo 111 +/- 20 mm Hg vs. antihistamines 119 +/- 35 mm Hg). However, in the placebo group the haemodynamics only stabilised 5 min after mesenteric traction when anaesthetic gas concentration was repeatedly reduced and vasopressor/volume administration was increased (placebo-group = 20 times/antihistamine-group = 8 times, p = 0.001, t-test). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic administration of antihistamines reduced the incidence of histamine release as well as the incidence of arrhythmias and the amount of stabilising measures during mesenteric traction. Prophylaxis with H1 and H2 antihistamines may be of perioperative benefit and should therefore be considered in AAA-surgery.

Histamine H3 receptor-mediated inhibition of noradrenaline release in the human brain.

Stimulation-evoked 3H-noradrenaline release in human cerebrocortical slices was inhibited by histamine (in a manner sensitive to clobenpropit) and by imetit, suggesting H3 receptor-mediated inhibition of noradrenaline release in human brain.

The effect of antiallergic intranasal formulations on ciliary beat frequency of human nasal epithelium in vitro.

The nasal mucociliary clearance is an important defense mechanism of the upper respiratory tract. It is known to be influenced by many pharmacologic substances. We investigated the effects of three topical intranasal antiallergic formulations containing disodium cromoglycate (DNCG), dimethindene maleate (DMM), and azelastine-HCL (AZL) on nasal ciliary beat frequency (CBF) in vitro. Nasal ciliated cells were harvested from 16 healthy volunteers. Cells were diluted 1:10 in culture medium and incubated with a placebo formulation (PLAC), containing 0.022% benzalkonium chloride, which was part of all formulations, a registered 2% formulation of DNCG, a 0.1% formulation of DMM, and a registered 0.1% formulation of AZL. After an incubation period of 20 min, CBF was registered by a photoelectric measurement device. Under control conditions (CONTROL), CBF was 11.4 +/- 1.3 Hz. PLAC reduced CBF to 9.7 +/- 2.3 Hz (NS). DNCG reduced CBF to 9.7 +/- 2 Hz (NS). DMM reduced CBF to 7.2 +/- 1.7 Hz (P < or = 0.05 vs CONTROL, NS vs PLAC), and AZL reduced CBF to 0.9 +/- 1.8 Hz (P < or = 0.001 vs CONTROL, P < or = 0.001 vs DNCG, P < or = 0.001 vs PLAC). In conclusion, a possible influence of antiallergic intranasal formulations on nasal ciliary function has to be considered in clinical application.

Administration of H1 and H2 antagonists for chemoprophylaxis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed to establish the duration of action of antihistamines and their ability to attenuate the adverse affects associated with histamine release. Thirty volunteers were assigned randomly to receive either placebo or a combination of the H1 blocker dimetindene maleate (0.1 mg/kg) and the H2 blocker cimetidine (5 mg/kg). A bolus dose of histamine (450 ng/kg) was given 15 minutes after antihistamine or placebo treatment and repeated after 2, 4, and 6 hours. Cardiovascular variables, plasma histamine levels, cutaneous manifestations, and objective and subjective signs and symptoms associated with histamine release were determined before and after each histamine injection. Although many of the signs of histamine release, including erythema and metallic taste, could be attenuated effectively for 6 hours with antihistamine treatment, the protection against histamine-induced flush and headache diminished after 2 hours. Statistically significant protection against histamine-mediated tachycardia persisted for only 2 hours. Antihistamine treatment significantly reduced the increase in plasma histamine levels after the first histamine injection but did not alter the levels after subsequent histamine injections. The currently recommended administration regimen for prophylaxis with antihistamines is insufficient to prevent histamine-mediated side effects, and additional doses may be required after 4 hours to achieve appropriate chemoprophylaxis.

Lack of the specific influence of histamine and histamine H1, H2 and H3 receptor ligands on the serotonin uptake and release in rat blood platelets.

This work was designed to investigate the influence of histamine, and H1 receptor agonist 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine, H2 receptor agonist dimaprit and H3 receptor agonist R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine on the serotonin uptake and release in rat blood platelets. Histamine and R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine (up to 1 mmol/l), 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine (up to 10 mumol/l) and dimaprit (up to 1 mumol/l) failed to affect the serotonin uptake. The concentration-dependent inhibitory effects of higher concentrations of 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine and dimaprit (up to 1 mmol/l) were not diminished by the H1 receptor antagonist dimetindene and the H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine (1 and 100 mumol/l each), respectively. Histamine, 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine, dimaprit and R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine (up to 10 mumol/l) did not change the serotonin release from rat blood platelets. Our results demonstrate that histamine and histamine H1, H2 and H3 receptor agonists do not affect in a specific manner the serotonin uptake and release in rat blood platelets.

Effects of dimethindene maleate on psychomotor performance in the oculodynamic test compared with placebo and loratadine.

The effects of dimethindene maleate (CAS 3614-69-5) on the central nervous system-as sustained release pellets (Fenistil OAD; OAD = once a day) and sustained release tablets (Fenistil retard) with an immediate release fraction-were investigated by means of the oculodynamic test (ODT) and visual analogue scales and compared to loratadine (CAS 79794-75-5) and placebo. In the confirmatory part of the study 18 healthy volunteers were included in a single-blind, randomised, 3-way change-over design with Fenistil OAD, loratadine, and placebo. An additional, fourth exploratory arm with Fenistil retard was run in 6 (out of the 18) subjects after completing the main part of the study. The ODT includes electro-oculography, choice reaction task, and cardiologic parameters under workload. Visual analogue scales were used for subjective ratings on well-being and drug effects concerning wakefulness (sedation), excitation, dizziness, performance, effort, and dry mouth. The results show no relevant differences between either of the active drugs and placebo. Therefore it can be stated that after a single dose there is no sedating effect of dimethindene maleate compared to loratadine or placebo.

The role of histamine H1 receptors in the thermoregulatory effect of morphine in mice.

Morphine is known to release histamine from mast cells and increase the turnover of neuronal histamine. It is also known that histamine receptors mediate some of the morphine effects. The contribution of histamine H1 and H2 receptors to the thermoregulatory effect of morphine in mice was investigated in the present experiments. Morphine produced a hypothermic effect, especially at the dose of 10 mg/kg. Although the histamine H1 receptor antagonist, dimethindene (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.), attenuated the hypothermic effect of morphine (10 mg/kg), a histamine H2 receptor antagonist, ranitidine (100 mg/kg, i.p.), had no effect. These results suggest that the hypothermic effect of morphine in mice is mediated, at least partly, through histamine H1 receptors.