Comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness between isosorbide-5-mononitrate and isosorbide: a retrospective real-world evaluation.

Aim: The cost-effectiveness of isosorbide-5-mononitrate (5-ISMN) and isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) in real-world use in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD; either angina pectoris or myocardial infarction) was retrospectively compared. Method: In this retrospective real-world evaluation, patients with established CHD satisfying the following criteria were selected from information system of two tertiary hospitals in China: with pharmacy claiming for at least one injection of 5-ISMN or ISDN between July 2008 and May 2017; and, CHD patients. By using propensity score matching (PSM), we compared clinical aspects of efficacy, safety, length of hospital stay and cost during hospitalization between 5-ISMN and ISDN group. All data were processed by R statistical package v.2.13.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Result: Of 5609 patients selected, 4047 received 5-ISMN and 1562 received ISDN. After PSM, we acquired 1555 pairs based on balancing of age, sex, insurance and comorbidities on admission. The frequency (4.2 ± 6.6-times vs 6.5 ± 9.5-times; p < 0.05) and total dosage (47.5 ± 153.4 vs 136.4 ± 261.0 mg; p < 0.05) of sublingual nitroglycerin use decreased and hypotension incidence lowered (8.0 vs 13.0%; p < 0.05) in 5-ISMN group compared with ISDN group. Hospital stay (16.0 ± 11.3 days vs 17.7 ± 13.2; p < 0.05) and hospitalization expenditure ([the ratio of cost in the study to the average hospitalization cost in the city] [odds ratio: 2.5 vs 2.6; p < 0.05]) were reduced in 5-ISMN group as with that of ISDN group. Moreover, the main component of hospitalization cost was medical consumables and medications in both the groups. Conclusion: In the present retrospective real-world evaluation, by using PSM analysis, we found that newer injection agent of 5-ISMN was associated with fewer use of sublingual nitroglycerin, less hypotension incidence, shorter length of hospital stay and less hospitalization expenditure related to its comparator ISDN in patients with established CHD. Further evaluation and clinical experience are need in different circumference for the usage of ISDN.

[Comparison of isosorbide dinitrate and dinoprostone for induction of labor in term pregnancy]. / Isosorbide y dinoprostona en inducción del trabajo de parto.

BACKGROUND: it has been suggested that nitric oxide generators, such as isosorbide dinitrate, may be an alternative to mimic the effects of signal transduction mechanisms leading to cervical ripening, without affecting uterine contractility. OBJECTIVE: to compare the isosorbide dinitrate and dinoprostone for induction of labor in term pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: in a randomized controlled blinded clinical trial, we studied 66 patients divided into 2 groups: 33 patients were given 20 mg of isosorbide dinitrate and to the other 33 were administered 0.5 mcg of dinoprostone; in both groups the drugs were administered vaginally each 6 h and at maximum 3 times. It was carried out a cardiotocographic study in order to determine the presence or absence of uterine activity and to exclude disorders of the fetal heart frequency; it was performed a vaginal examination to assess cervical conditions determining the Bishop score at 0, 6 and 12 h. RESULTS: there were no differences between the groups in the determinations of mean arterial pressure, maternal heart frequency, fetal heart frequency and Bishop score registered at 6 y 12 h followed the drugs administration. The time of delivery was 20.7 +/- 1.8 h in the group of women treated with dinoprostone; and 16.3 +/- 1.4 h in women treated with isosorbide dinitrate (p=0.032). The cost was higher in women treated with dinoprostone ($560 vs $12, respectively, p=0.001). There was no difference between the groups related to: frequency of meconium stained liquid (p=1.000), mode of delivery by caesarean section (p=0.918), Apgar score at 1 minute (p=0.764) and 5 minutes (p=0.294) and mother discharged with healthy baby (p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: the isosorbide dinitrate is associated with lower duration of labor compared with dinoprostone. There was no difference in the maternal-fetal outcome by using whatever drug.

[Treatment of chronic anal fissures: diltiazem or isosorbide dinitrate as first choice?]. / Behandeling van chronische anale fissuren. Diltiazem of isosorbidedinitraat als middel van eerste keus?

Chronic anal fissures are a painful condition frequently seen in general practice, with an incidence of 2,5/1000 per year. According to the practice guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners, isosorbide dinitrate 1% ointment (ISDN) is the treatment of first choice for chronic anal fissures. Systemic side-effects such as headache are reported in 27% of all cases. This side effect in combination with the frequent application of ISDN (4-6 times daily) leads to a low compliance for this therapy. A meta-analysis of the Cochrane Collaboration showed similar efficacy of diltiazem compared to ISDN. Diltiazem has several advantages: the application frequency is only twice daily, no systemic side-effects have been reported, the total costs of treatment are lower than the costs of ISDN and a standard preparation of diltiazem ointment is available. Therefore, diltiazem 2% ointment should be the first line treatment for chronic anal fissures.

The cost-effectiveness of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate prior to induction of labour.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour. DESIGN: Economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomised placebo controlled trial (the IMOP trial). SETTING: Large UK maternity hospital. POPULATION: A total of 350 nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation > or = 37 weeks gestation, requiring cervical ripening prior to induction of labour. INTERVENTIONS: Isosorbide mononitrate (n = 177) or placebo (n = 173) self-administered vaginally at home at 48, 32 and 16 hours prior to the scheduled time of admission for induction. RESULTS: Mean health service costs between the period of randomisation and discharge for mother and infant were 1254.86 pound sterling in the IMN group and 1242.88 pound sterling in the placebo group, generating a mean cost difference of 11.98 pound sterling (bootstrap mean cost difference 12.86 pound sterling; 95%CI: -106.79 pound sterling, 129.39 pound sterling) that was not statistically significant (P = 0.842). The incremental cost per hour prevented from hospital admission to delivery was 7.53 pound sterling. At the notional willingness to pay threshold of 100 pound sterling per hour prevented from hospital admission to delivery, the probability that IMN is cost-effective was estimated at 0.67. This translated into a mean net monetary benefit of 98.13 pound sterling for each woman given IMN. CONCLUSIONS: Although the probability that IMN is cost-effective approaches 0.7 at seemingly low willingness to pay thresholds for an hour prevented from hospital admission to delivery, our results should be viewed in the light of the clinical findings from the IMOP trial.

Isosorbide mononitrate versus alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness, safety, and affordability of isosorbide mononitrate with alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of 60 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mg daily of isosorbide mononitrate or 70 mg weekly of alendronate for 12 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and after 12 months. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement in BMD. Isosorbide mononitrate yielded a comparable effect to alendronate for BMD and T-score at the end of the follow-up period. For BMD and T score the mean differences between the 2 groups were -0.005 (95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03) and 0.31 (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.64), respectively. A 10.8% and 12.1% change in BMD after 12 months was seen for isosorbide mononitrate and alendronate, respectively. CONCLUSION: Isosorbide mononitrate is comparable to alendronate. Nitric oxide donors may be an effective and affordable therapy to improve bone mineral density.

Cost comparison analysis: pentaerythrithyl tetranitrate (PETN) and isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) prescribed to diabetic patients in primary care practices in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Both pentaerythrithyltetranitrate (Pentalong, PETN) and isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) are commonly used in the therapy of ischemic heart disease (IHD). However, little is known about the therapeutic patterns in diabetic patients and no comparative data are available regarding the prescription costs of these two substances. Thus, the aim of this investigation was to compare the costs for PETN and ISDN therapy in diabetic patients in primary care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All continuously treated patients aged > or = 40 years with diabetes (anti-diabetic agents) and IHD or angina pectoris (ICD codes) and newly started on PETN or ISDN therapy (index date) in the period 2000-2005 were selected from a database containing data from 400 practices throughout Germany (Disease Analyzer, IMS Health). Prescriptions costs for PETN and ISDN, as well as costs for cardiovascular comedication, were determined for the period 183 days before and after the index date, and that changes in costs after the index date were calculated. Differences in costs between the two groups were evaluated using multivariate regression, adjusting for age, sex and comorbidity. Patients in Eastern (n = 137, age 71 +/- 10 years, 55% male) and Western Germany (n = 212, age 73 +/- 9 years, 50% male) were analyzed separately since there is a longer history of PETN use in Eastern Germany. RESULTS: Significantly more patients were treated with PETN in Eastern Germany (61 vs. 11%, p < 0.05). The patient groups treated with PETN and ISDN differed with respect to sex and comorbidity. PETN therapy was more expensive than ISDN therapy in both German regions (adjusted cost differences were 10 and 17 Euro). However, when comedication was taken into account, a smaller cost increase after the index date was observed in the PETN group than in the ISDN group (non-significant cost savings of 43 and 52 Euro after adjustment for Western and Eastern Germany, respectively). CONCLUSION: PETN therapy tends to produce a saving in costs compared to ISDN therapy in diabetic patients when costs for comedication are taken into account and after adjustment for age and comorbidity. The prescription patterns in Eastern and Western Germany and the patient characteristics of those receiving PETN and ISDN differed, indicating differences in patients selection and prescribing by physicians in the two regions.

BiDil (isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine): a new fixed-dose combination of two older medications for the treatment of heart failure in black patients.

BiDil is a new fixed-dose combination of 2 older medications, isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) and hydralazine. ISDN is an organic nitrate that is biotransformed into nitric oxide, a potent vasodilator. Hydralazine is believed to have both vasodilatory properties specific to the arteries and antioxidant properties, which address both the biochemical alterations in the failing cardiovascular system as well as the issue of nitrate tolerance. A drug regimen combining an NO stimulator (ISDN) with an antioxidant (hydralazine) favorably influences the nitroso-redox balance. Retrospective analyses of previous heart failure (HF) clinical trials comparing the combination of ISDN and hydralazine with placebo and enalapril, respectively, demonstrated a benefit in the black population, setting the precedent for a race-based therapeutic study, the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT). A-HeFT examined the use of BiDil added to standard HF therapy in blacks with New York Heart Association functional class III and IV HF. BiDil demonstrated a 43% reduction in mortality when compared with placebo. As a result, current evidence-based treatment guidelines recommend that the addition of ISDN and hydralazine in black patients with moderate to severe HF optimized on standard therapy be considered. BiDil is currently indicated for the treatment of HF as an adjunct to standard therapy in black patients. The use of BiDil for black patients with mild disease or in nonblack patients with HF has not been studied. Future clinical trials involving an ethnically and clinically diverse population of patients would further define the role of combined ISDN and hydralazine in the treatment of HF.

BiDil: assessing a race-based pharmaceutical.

Isosorbide and hydralazine in a fixed-dose combination (BiDil) has provoked controversy as the first drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration marketed for a single racial-ethnic group, African Americans, in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Family physicians will be better prepared to counsel their patients about this new drug if they understand a number of background issues. The scientific research leading to BiDil's approval tested the drug only in African American populations, apparently for commercial reasons, so the drug's efficacy in other populations is unknown. Race as a biological-medical construct is increasingly controversial; BiDil offers a good example of how sociocultural factors in disease causation may be overlooked as a result of an overly simplistic assumption of a racial and hence presumed genetic difference. Past discrimination and present disparities in health care involving African American patients are serious concerns, and we must welcome a treatment that promises to benefit a previously underserved group; yet the negative aspects of BiDil and the process that led to its discovery and marketing set an unfortunate precedent. Primary care physicians should be aware of possible generic equivalents that will affect the availability of this drug for low-income or uninsured patients.

Cost-effectiveness of fixed-dose combination of isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine therapy for blacks with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Fixed-dose combination of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine (ISDN/HYD) improved clinical outcomes in the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT). We assessed the resource use, costs of care, and cost-effectiveness of ISDN/HYD therapy in the A-HeFT trial population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We obtained resource use data from A-HeFT, assigning costs through the use of US federal sources. Excluding indirect costs, we summarized the within-trial experience and modeled cost-effectiveness over extended time horizons, including a US societal lifetime reference case. During the mean trial follow-up of 12.8 months, the ISDN/HYD group incurred fewer heart failure-related hospitalizations (0.33 versus 0.47 per subject; P=0.002) and shorter mean hospital stays (6.7 versus 7.9 days; P=0.006). When study drug costs were excluded, both heart failure-related and total healthcare costs were lower in the ISDN/HYD group (mean per-subject heart failure-related costs, 5997 dollars versus 9144 dollars; P=0.04; mean per-subject total healthcare costs, 15,384 dollars versus 19,728 dollars; P=0.03). With an average daily drug cost of 6.38 dollars, ISDN/HYD therapy was dominant (reduced costs and improved outcomes) over the trial duration. Assuming that no additional benefits accrue beyond the trial, we project the cost-effectiveness of ISDN/HYD therapy using heart failure-related costs to be 16,600 dollars/life-year at 2 years after enrollment, 37,100 dollars/life-year at 5 years, and 41,800 dollars/life-year over lifetime (reference case). CONCLUSIONS: ISDN/HYD therapy, previously shown to improve clinical outcomes, also reduced resource use and costs in A-HeFT, primarily because of a large reduction in hospitalizations. Long-term use of ISDN/HYD therapy should be associated with a favorable cost-effectiveness profile in this population.

Impact of reference-based pricing of nitrates on the use and costs of anti-anginal drugs.

BACKGROUND: Reference-based pricing limits reimbursement for a group of drugs that are deemed therapeutically equivalent to the cost of the lowest-priced product within that group. We estimated the effect of reference-based pricing of nitrate drugs used for long-term prophylaxis on prescribing of and expenditures on nitrates and other anti-anginal drugs dispensed to senior citizens in British Columbia. METHODS: We assessed trends in the monthly volume of prescriptions of anti-anginal drugs and the associated drug ingredient cost paid by the province's publicly funded drug subsidy program, Pharmacare, and by the patients themselves for the period April 1994 to May 1999. Trends in monthly rates of nitrate expenditures per 100,000 senior citizens before the introduction of reference-based pricing were extrapolated to infer what expenditures would have been without the policy. RESULTS: During the 3 1/2 years after reference-based pricing was introduced, Pharmacare expenditures on nitrates prescribed to senior citizens declined by $14.9 million (95% confidence interval $10.7 to $19.1 million). Most of these savings were due to the lower prices that Pharmacare paid for sustained-release nitroglycerin tablets and the nitroglycerin patch, which were the 2 most frequently prescribed nitrates before the introduction of reference-based pricing; $1.2 million (8%) of the savings represented expenditures by senior citizens who purchased drugs that were only partially reimbursed. There were no compensatory increases in expenditures for other anti-anginal drugs. Use of sublingual nitroglycerin--a marker for deteriorating health in patients with angina--did not increase after the introduction of reference-based pricing. The nitroglycerin patch is now the most frequently prescribed nitrate, owing to the fact that Pharmacare resumed the provision of full subsidies for the drug after its manufacturers voluntarily reduced retail prices. INTERPRETATION: Evidence to date suggests that reference-based pricing of nitrates has achieved its primary goal of reducing drug expenditures. The effects of this policy on patient health, associated health care costs and administrative costs remain to be investigated.

The prescription pattern of oral nitrates in coronary artery disease. Appropriateness and cost considerations.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prescription patterns of oral nitrates in terms of appropriateness and cost in a community setting. METHODS: A period prevalence, descriptive, applied study. Data including age, gender, type of medication, dosage and cost were extracted from the database of the largest health maintenance organisation (HMO) in Israel. The study population included enrollees over 35 years of age who received oral nitrates at least once during the 12-month study period. RESULTS: Oral nitrates were prescribed for 8007 patients (mean age 72.85+/-9.59 years, male:female ratio 1:1). A total of 52,694 prescriptions were issued for 56,553 medications, of these 88.1% for mononitrates, which constituted 95% of the annual cost for patients and the HMO. The mean prescribed daily dose for the various drugs ranged from 30% less than to 50% more than the recommended dose. Combination therapy with at least two nitrates, which is not the recommended treatment, was given to 5% of the patients. The recommended alternative treatment will alleviate the financial burden for providers and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Improved prescription habits can provide enhanced quality as well as cost savings for patients and providers.

[Comparative study of isosorbide dinitrates and mononitrates in patients with ischemic heart disease and stable angina pectoris caused by stenosing coronary atherosclerosis]. / Sravnitel'noe izuchenie izosorbida di- i mononitratov u bol'nykh ishemicheskoi bolezn'iu serdtsa so stabil'noi stenokardiei, obuslovlennoi stenoziruiushim koronarnym aterosklerozom.

In an open clinical trial 19 patients with angina pectoris (functional class II-III) received in turn either non-retard tablets of isosorbide dinitrate (nitrosorbid, cardiket) in a mean dose 80 mg/day or isosorbide 5-mononitrate (mono mac) in a mean dose 51.5 mg/day. Each drug was given for a month. The effect was assessed by changes in frequency of anginal attacks and exercise tolerance. Non-retard isosorbide dinitrate and isosorbide 5-mononitrate demonstrate a good antiischemic effect, are safe and well tolerated. Isosorbide dinitrate and mononitrates do not differ significantly in reduction of the anginal attacks and by an increase in exercise tolerance but the effective dose of mono mac was 1.5-2 times less than that of nitrosorbide or cardiket, thus it is more cost-effective.

Cost analysis of once-daily ISMN versus twice-daily ISMN or transdermal patch for nitrate prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs and outcomes of treating exercise-induced angina with once- or twice-daily isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) or transdermal patch. METHOD: A decision-analytic model was designed based on published literature showing compliance and increasing symptoms and estimates from physicians on treatment patterns and worsening symptoms. RESULTS: Data show that patients are more compliant with once-daily ISMN (Imdur, Astra Hässle, Mölndal, Sweden) and patch regimens than with twice-daily dose. Based upon the assumption that more compliant patients are better controlled, the model found that fewer medical care resources were consumed by patients treated with the once-daily and the patch regimens. The unit cost of the twice-daily ISMN regimen is 40% of the unit cost of the once-daily. Annual costs of treating an exercise-induced angina patient are 248 pounds for Imdur compared to 250 pounds for the twice-daily ISMN and 299 pounds for the transdermal patch. CONCLUSION: Unit prices alone are not good indicators for estimating medical management costs.