More than just contraception: the impact of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on public health over 30 years.

Universal access to sexual and reproductive health services is essential to facilitate the empowerment of women and achievement of gender equality. Increasing access to modern methods of contraception can reduce the incidence of unplanned pregnancy and decrease maternal mortality. Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) offer high contraceptive efficacy as well as cost-efficacy, providing benefits for both women and healthcare systems. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) first became available in 1990 with the introduction of Mirena (LNG-IUS 20), a highly effective contraceptive which can reduce menstrual blood loss and provide other therapeutic benefits. The impact of the LNG-IUS on society has been wide ranging, including decreasing the need for abortion, reducing the number of surgical sterilisation procedures performed, as well as reducing the number of hysterectomies carried out for issues such as heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Mirena can provide a treatment option for women with gynaecological issues such as HMB without organic pathology, minimising exposure to the hospital environment and reducing waiting times for surgical appointments. Looking to the future, research and development in the field of the LNG-IUS continues to expand our understanding of these contraceptives in clinical practice and offers the potential to further expand the choices available to women, allowing them to select the option that best meets their needs.

New developments in long-acting reversible contraception: the promise of intrauterine devices and implants to improve family planning services.

After decades of having the developed world's highest rates of unintended pregnancy, the United States finally shows signs of improvement. This progress is likely due in large part to increased use of highly effective long-acting reversible methods of contraception. These methods can be placed and do not require any maintenance to provide years of contraception as effective as sterilization. Upon removal, fertility returns to baseline rates. This article addresses advances in both software-improved use and elimination of barriers to provide these methods; and hardware-novel delivery systems and devices.

Trends in family planning and counselling for women with sickle cell disease in the UK over two decades.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancies in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) are known to have high rates of maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. Given these pregnancy-associated problems for women with SCD, advice both about pregnancy planning and about effective contraception are of paramount importance. This study sought to discover the contraception methods used by women with SCD, what complications women with SCD encounter with contraception, and their experiences of pre-pregnancy counselling and pregnancy planning, and how such issues may have changed over the past two decades. METHOD: The study was a multicentre, interview-based, cross-sectional study. Interviews were carried out with 102 women with SCD, in north and central London during 2010, concerning their current and previous contraceptive use, their pregnancy history, their menstrual history, and the advice they received concerning pregnancy planning and contraception. Patient information was anonymised and ethical approval was obtained. These data were compared with data from a similar study undertaken in 1993. RESULTS: There were significant differences in a number of key areas: the number of unplanned pregnancies decreased from 64% in 1993 to 53% in 2010. The number of women with SCD who were advised not to become pregnant also fell, from 36% to 15%. The use of combined oral contraceptive pills declined, from 45% of the women in 1993 to 31% in 2010. Conversely the use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception (DMPA) and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) both increased. CONCLUSIONS: Significant changes in the contraceptive methods used by women with SCD are demonstrated in the London population. LNG-IUS use in SCD has not been investigated before. There has been an encouraging decrease in the number of women with SCD who are advised not to become pregnant, perhaps reflecting an improvement in their overall health. Although the number of unplanned pregnancies has fallen, it remains high - emphasising the continuing need for women with SCD to have access to informed advice about pregnancy-associated issues and contraception.

The impact of alternative treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding on hysterectomy rates in a tertiary referral center.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the influence of alternatives to hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) on hysterectomy rates. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. Canadian Task Force II-2. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Premenopausal patients with AUB. INTERVENTIONS: Medical records of all premenopausal patients treated for AUB in our university clinic between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2004, were reviewed. Patients were identified based on (specific) diagnostic and therapy codes used in the registry system of the hospital. The total number of placements of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD), hysteroscopic surgery, and hysterectomies performed/year was estimated. In addition, the course of treatment of each patient was assessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 640 patients received surgery and 246 LNG-IUDs were placed. The proportion of endometrial ablations decreased significantly over time (p <.001), whereas hysteroscopic polyp or myoma removal (p =.030) and insertion of LNG-IUD (p <.001) both increased. The proportion of patients receiving hysterectomy for AUB as their first therapy decreased significantly (p =.005) from 40.6% to 31.4%, although the total number of patients receiving hysterectomy remained similar (p =.449). The 5-year intervention-free percentage for LNG-IUD was 70.6% (SD = 3.3%), for hysteroscopic polyp or myoma removal 75.5% (SD = 3.3%), and for endometrial ablation 78.0% (SD = 4.3%; p =.067). CONCLUSION: Despite the introduction of alternative therapies, the total hysterectomy rate in the management of AUB did not decrease in our clinic.

[NuvaRing-combined contraceptive vaginal ring: state of art in 2008. Expert Board of Polish Gynecological Society]. / Stanawisko zespolu ekspertów Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego. Dopochwowy hormonalny system antykoncepcyjny (NuvaRing)-stan wiedzy na 2008 rok.

The development of steroid-releasing vaginal rings over the past three decades is reviewed to illustrate the role of this device as an effective hormonal contraceptive for women. NuvaRing is a combined contraceptive vaginal ring that releases constant low doses of ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel. The soft flexible combined ring is inserted in the vagina for three weeks and removed for seven days to allow withdrawal bleeding with no serious side-effects. Maximum levels of EE and ENG with NuvaRing were 30% and 40%, respectively, of those seen with the COC. Because ENG bioavailability was higher following vaginal administration, the systemic progestogen exposures were comparable with the oral contraceptives. NuvaRing has been shown to be safe and effective, with high levels of user compliance, acceptance and patient satisfaction.

The latest advances in hormonal contraception.

Millions of women each year start or continue to use some type of hormonal contraceptive method. Choosing a method may be anxiety provoking. In this article, we review some of the latest advances in and options for hormonal contraception, including extended-dose oral contraceptives, the vaginal ring, injectable methods, and emergency contraception. Nurses can facilitate women's decision making for healthy reproductive options.

Beyond the pill: new data and options in hormonal and intrauterine contraception.

With the goal of helping clinicians facilitate contraceptive success for their patients, this Clinical Opinion provides an update regarding older hormonal and intrauterine contraceptives and details newer methods that include the progestin-releasing intrauterine system, the contraceptive patch and ring, and extended and emergency oral contraception. Last, I will look over the horizon and briefly describe potential future methods that include the single rod progestin-releasing implant, folic acid-supplemented oral contraceptives, and hormonal contraception for men.

Miniature, low-dose, intrauterine drug-delivery systems.

The safety of systemically administered sex steroids continues to be a major focus of researchers. The negative results of the Women's Health Initiative study (WHI), and follow-up reports published in JAMA, evaluating the safety of estro-progestogen in postmenopausal women, elicited an unprecedented reaction in the press by women and doctors alike. From these publications, it is clear that research should focus on new progestogens and on alternative administration routes to minimize adverse drug effects. One approach to the improvement of safety, efficacy, and acceptability of steroid hormones, including patient compliance, is to develop long-acting implantable methods that deliver the lowest possible dose to the key target tissues. This therapeutic concept of "minimal intervention" has been known for several decades, but the practical applications of the method were lacking. Intrauterine drug-delivery systems can be developed to achieve minimal intervention fertility control without influencing normal ovarian function and/or causing adverse hormonal effects. With hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women, research suggests that progestogens delivered directly to the uterine mucosa could reduce side effects and minimize reversal of the beneficial effect of estrogens. Various "frameless" and "framed" intrauterine systems are currently being clinically evaluated. They are less troublesome than the available intrauterine systems and could therefore be suitable for use in the majority of women for contraception and treatment purposes (e.g., menorrhagia, hormone replacement). These systems require a single short office procedure, and have a low morbidity, which is undeniably linked with more invasive methods and systemic hormonal contraceptives. Due to the technological progress miniature, low-dose, long-term intrauterine drug-delivery systems offer enhanced effectiveness, reduced side effects, and optimal user compliance. Although there is minimal absorption in the systemic circulation, they deserve the status of a locally acting method that should be regarded as fundamentally advantageous, if effective, to systemically applied medications that may have potentially inherent ill side effects.

The levonorgestrel intrauterine system: a clinical perspective from the UK.

The main contraceptive effects of this valuable product [the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS)] are by endometrial suppression and changes to the cervical mucus and uterotubal fluid that impair sperm migration. The blood levels of LNG are very low, so progestogenic symptoms are uncommon. Most women still ovulate and in the remainder sufficient estrogen for health is produced from the ovary, even if they become amenorrhoeic, as many do; this is primarily a local end-organ effect and should be seen as a benefit. Although usable by selected nulliparae, it is ideal for the parous woman. It has unsurpassed efficacy, and return of fertility is rapid. Combining the best features of hormonal and intrauterine contraception, its gynecological benefits are impressive: the LNG-IUS user can expect a dramatic reduction in the amount and, after the first few occasionally troublesome months, in the duration of blood loss. Hemoglobin levels rise and dysmenorrhea is usually greatly benefited, unlike with current uterine ablation techniques. In perimenopausal women, it can protect the endometrium from overstimulation when estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is added, by any chosen route. It thus provides a contraceptive modality of ERT with, usually, no bleeding and few progestogenic side effects-and is applicable before final ovarian failure. In summary, adverse side effects are few and in general they are not in the "hazardous" category. Regarding the admitted inconvenience of the first weeks of light postinsertion bleeding and the early phase low incidence of steroidal side effects: good counseling is paramount, since forewarned is forearmed!

Take a fresh look at IUDs. Things have changed.

BACKGROUND: Over the past few years, the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) has overcome many of the problems that had initially made it unpopular. Today it is probably the most cost effective reversible form of contraception available. OBJECTIVE: To examine the reasons for poor utilisation of IUDs in Australia and to describe recent developments in the field of intrauterine devices/systems. DISCUSSION: Myths concerning mechanisms of action and the potential for pelvic inflammatory disease, lack of familiarity, training and high insurance costs continue to limit the ability of general practitioners to fully utilise the potential of IUDs. The introduction of the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system has however, broadened the indication for IUDs from just being contraceptive to being therapeutic for several gynaecological conditions.

New directions in IUCD development.

In recent years, the development of improved intrauterine devices has focused on finding methods to reduce expulsion and the need for medical removal for better intrauterine retention and devices. Efforts also have been directed towards developing intracervical devices. Some of the more recent developments in intrauterine and intracervical devices are discussed.

The IUD in evolution.

PIP: Many of the major conclusions regarding IUD performance reached by the Cooperative Statistical Program (CSP) during 1963-68 continue to guide understanding of this contraceptive method. The CSP evaluation, based on more than 180,000 woman-months of observation, concluded: 1) the smaller the size of the IUD, the greater the pregnancy and expulsion rates; 2) the larger the IUD, the greater the probability of removal for bleeding; 3) pregnancy, expulsion, and removal rates are highest in the first year of use; 4) expulsion rates decrease with increasing age and parity; and 5) user removal rates decrease with increasing parity. Today's IUDs have evolved in conjunction with rigorous scientific standards and sophisticated methodologies. The era of the inert IUD ended with the withdrawal of the Dalkon Shield in 1974. At this time, the copper T380A is the most effective device. Although a progestin-containing IUD has been available since 1976, it has a higher failure rate than copper-releasing devices and must be replaced annually. Widespread use of the IUD among US women has been hindered by fear of litigation, limited training in IUD insertion, and misinterpretation of epidemiologic data concerning the association between IUDs and infection and infertility. Improvement in hormone-bearing IUDs is the most likely area for further IUD development in the US.^ieng