RESUMO
Gender was an important component in the May '68 revolution. However, what was originally proposed as an effort for equality and the defense of the legitimate prerogatives of women, evolved into a movement, gender post-feminism, which it set aside their real interests and needs, pursuing other, even contradictory, goals. This article tries to justify the previous statement, starting from some of the main currents of thought what were at the base of the revolution.
Assuntos
Distúrbios Civis/história , Feminismo/história , Identidade de Gênero , Direitos da Mulher/história , Atitude , Distúrbios Civis/ética , Comunismo , Cultura , Existencialismo , Família , Feminino , França , Teoria Freudiana , Papel de Gênero , História do Século XX , Humanos , Casamento , Mães , Comportamento Sexual , Mulheres TrabalhadorasAssuntos
Distúrbios Civis/legislação & jurisprudência , Distúrbios Civis/psicologia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/legislação & jurisprudência , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/psicologia , Psiquiatria Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Militares/legislação & jurisprudência , Militares/psicologia , Papel do Médico/psicologia , Prisioneiros/legislação & jurisprudência , Prisioneiros/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Tortura/legislação & jurisprudência , Tortura/psicologia , Cristianismo/psicologia , Distúrbios Civis/ética , Ética Médica , Psiquiatria Legal/ética , Humanos , Islamismo/psicologia , Líbano/etnologia , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Religião e Psicologia , Resiliência Psicológica , Justiça Social/legislação & jurisprudência , Justiça Social/psicologia , Tortura/ética , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Distúrbios Civis/ética , Confidencialidade , Direitos Humanos , Barein , Dissidências e Disputas , Humanos , Tortura/éticaRESUMO
In Israel, it is quite rare for psychologists to relate to political and social issues. This remarkable tendency of psychologists to avoid dealing with such matters seems to supersede the common indifference or obtuseness of other groups in the Israeli public and similar groups in particular (e.g., physicians or social workers). Within this context, this paper focuses on the qualities and forms of reaction of the psychotherapeutic community in Israel to the national conflict that has been present intermittently since the late 1980s - namely, the two Intifadas. More specifically, as opposed to the current situation (the second Al-Aksa Intifada), in the course of the first Intifada (1987-1996), the voice of Israeli psychologists was clearly heard. Until now, this is the only exception to the rule of neutrality and passivity, in which psychologists in Israel became politically active. Specific elements of involvement of the therapeutic community is presented and discussed. Also, an attempt is made to suggest possible reasons to the very puzzling questions: Why then? Or what factors allowed for this change in position to occur? And more importantly, why did the protest of the psychologists in Israel vanish and their clear voices turn into silence?