Validation of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire in Chinese pregnant and postpartum women.

OBJECTIVES: To test the psychometric properties of the culturally adapted Chinese version of the self-administered Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) in pregnant and postpartum women. STUDY DESIGN: Between November 2018 and December 2018, a total of 316 pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria in an outpatient setting were enrolled. The participants completed the questionnaire during the third trimester and twice after delivery. The test for validity was composed of face/content validity and construct validity. Reliability testing included internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The degree of responsiveness was assessed using effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-four women completed all questionnaires. Content validity, missing data did not exceed 4 % for any questions in the Chinese version of the self-administered APFQ. Construct validity, there was statistically significant difference in the symptoms scores of women with and without subjective suffering bothersome symptoms in bladder function, bowel function, prolapse and sexual function during pregnancy and postpartum periods. Reliability, the total Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the questionnaire in pregnancy and postpartum periods were 0.8, 0.9 and 0.9, respectively, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the total questionnaire was 0.8 during the test-retest. Responsiveness, the Chinese version of APFQ can track changes in bladder function domain and bowel function domain for the women with standardized response mean equal to 0.6 and 0.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the self-administered APFQ had satisfactory reliability and validity, and can longitudinally monitor changes in pelvic floor symptoms during pregnancy and postpartum periods.

Differences in Pelvic Floor Symptoms During Pregnancy Between Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Women.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe and compare pelvic floor symptoms and symptom burden between nulliparous Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women in the third trimester of pregnancy and to determine, in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), whether bother differs between groups, adjusted for UI severity. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis, participants completed the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence and Incontinence Severity Index questionnaires. We compared differences in symptom domains between groups using logistic regression and tested the effect of ethnicity on bother in women with SUI using linear regression. RESULTS: The sample comprised 418 non-Hispanic white and 154 Hispanic women. Prevalence rates of symptom domains ranged from 5.0% and 7.1% for pelvic organ prolapse to 95.2% and 94.2% for overactive bladder in non-Hispanic white and Hispanic women, respectively. After adjusting age, height, weight, education, physical activity, and gestational age, non-Hispanic whites had 2.37-fold increased odds (95% confidence interval, 1.44-3.92) for defecatory dysfunction and had nonsignificant increases in other symptom domains. Non-Hispanic whites were more likely to endorse symptoms in 3 or more domains than Hispanic women (58.9% vs 40.3%, respectively; P = 0.0001). Given the same UI severity (Incontinence Severity Index), Hispanic women with SUI reported 7.5 points greater bother (Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence) than non-Hispanic white women (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment, we found few differences in the prevalence of pelvic floor symptom domains between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women, apart from defecatory dysfunction. If differences by ethnicity in other pelvic floor symptoms exist, they do not seem to originate during the first pregnancy.

Prevalence of levator ani muscle avulsion and effect on quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion is associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). There is limited information on the prevalence of LAM avulsion in Chinese women with POP. This study evaluated the prevalence of LAM avulsion in women presenting with POP and the effects on their quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary urogynecology center. Chinese women presenting with POP were recruited and completed standardized questionnaires exploring their symptoms and QoL and underwent gynecological examination to assess the stage of POP and involved compartments. Four-dimensional translabial ultrasound (US) was performed on all women, and evaluation of LAM avulsion was done offline. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-eight women completed the study. The prevalence of LAM avulsion was 38.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.1-43.7%]; 31 (7.8%), 26 (6.5%), and 98 (24.6%) had left, right, and bilateral LAM avulsion, respectively. LAM avulsion was associated with a more advanced stage of prolapse (P < 0.005) and prolapse of stage ≥II of all three compartments. Bilateral LAM avulsion was associated with a more severe stage of prolapse. More women with LAM avulsion reported bothersome symptoms of prolapse and had higher Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI) and Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire (UIQ) scores, implying more impairment in QoL. However, after multivariate linear regression analysis, POP stage remained a significant predictor of POPDI and UDI scores (P ≤ 0.006); LAM avulsion was not a predictor (P = 0.2 and 0.27, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LAM avulsion was detected in 39% of Chinese women with POP. It was associated with a more advanced POP stage, and these women had more impairment of QoL. However, LAM avulsion was not an independent factor influencing the QoL of these women.