Luxturna: FDA documents reveal the value of a costly gene therapy.

In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (Luxturna), a gene therapy used to treat a rare form of inherited blindness. Widely described by the media as a curative treatment that 'restores vision', it was priced at US$850000. Although voretigene neparvovec-rzyl represents a substantial therapeutic advance, most reports have failed to adequately describe study outcomes as documented by FDA reviewers. These documents reveal that the drug is not expected to restore normal vision, that only about half of treated patients met the FDA's threshold for minimally meaningful improvement, that improvements might not persist long-term, that the most common measure of visual function was rejected as a primary endpoint after yielding mixed results, and that two patients experienced permanent vision loss. Over US$100 million of additional publicly-funded costs are not evident from the US$850000 figure.

A Cost-Effective Mutation Screening Strategy for Inherited Retinal Dystrophies.

OBJECTIVE: We developed a simple, time- and cost-effective Excel-based genetic screening strategy for the diagnosis of inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD). DESIGN: 76 patients diagnosed with IRD and 112 nonaffected family members, from 55 unrelated families, were included. DNA samples were analyzed using Axiom Exome Genotyping Array Plates (Affymetrix) that contain over 300,000 genetic variants, including more than 5,000 variants present in 181 genes involved in IRD. We used a simple Excel-based data mining strategy in order to screen IRD variants likely involved in the development of IRD. RESULTS: A total of 5 relevant genetic variants were found in 5 IRD genes. Four variants were reported either as pathogenic or with a prediction of probably damaging, and 1 variant was reported to affect a regulatory region. These variants were present in 14 patients and in 11 carriers, in 10 unrelated families. CONCLUSION: Using our Excel-based data screening strategy, we were able to assign likely genetic diagnoses in a fast and cost-effective manner to over 18% of patients analyzed, with a comparable ratio of genetic findings to that reported with retina-specific arrays for about 1/5 of the cost. Our approach proved efficient in reducing costs and time for IRD diagnosis as a first tier genetic screening method.