Survey on the Updated German S3 Guideline for Intensive Care in Cardiac Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: The German guideline on intensive care treatment of cardiac surgical patients provides evidence-based recommendations on management and monitoring. It remains unclear if, respectively, to which degree the guidelines are implemented into the daily practice. Therefore, this study aims to characterize the implementation of guideline recommendations in German cardiac surgical intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: An internet-based online survey (42 questions, 9 topics) was sent to 158 German head physicians of cardiac surgical ICUs. To compare the effect over time, most questions were based on a previously performed survey (2013) after introduction of the last guideline update in 2008. RESULTS: A total of n = 65 (41.1%) questionnaires were included. Monitoring changed to increased provision of available transesophageal echocardiography specialists in 86% (2013: 72.6%), SvO2 measurement in 93.8% (2013: 55.1%), and electroencephalography in 58.5% (2013: 2.6%). The use of hydroxyethyl starch declined (9.4% vs. 2013: 38.7%), gelatin 4% presented the most administered colloid with 23.4% (2013: 17.4%). Low cardiac output syndrome was primarily treated with levosimendan (30.8%) and epinephrine (23.1%), while norepinephrine (44.6%) and dobutamine (16.9%) represented the most favored drug combination. The main way of distribution was web-based (50.9%), with increasing impact on therapy regimens (36.9% vs. 2013: 24%). CONCLUSION: Changes were found in all questioned sectors compared with the preceding survey, with persisting variability between ICUs. Recommendations of the updated guideline have increasingly entered clinical practice, with participants valuing the updated publication as clinically relevant.

Predicting the effectiveness of drugs used for treating cardiovascular conditions in newborn infants.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular support (CVS) treatment failure (TF) is associated with a poor prognosis in preterm infants. METHODS: Medical charts of infants with a birth weight <1500 g who received either dopamine (Dp) or dobutamine (Db), were reviewed. Treatment response (TR) occurred if blood pressure increased >3rd centile for gestational age or superior vena cava flow was maintained >55 ml/kg/min, with decreased lactate or less negative base excess, without additional CVS. A predictive model of Dp and Db on TR was designed and the impact of TR on survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-six infants (median gestational age 27.3 weeks, median birth weight 864 g) received Dp (n = 44) or Db (n = 22). TR occurred in 59% of the cases treated with Dp and 31% with Db, p = 0.04. Machine learning identified a model that correctly labeled Db response in 90% of the cases and Dp response in 61.4%. Sixteen infants died (9% of the TR group, 39% of the TF group; p = 0.004). Brain or gut morbidity-free survival was observed in 52% vs 30% in the TR and TF groups, respectively (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: New predictive models can anticipate Db but not Dp effectiveness in preterm infants. These algorithms may help the clinicians in the decision-making process. IMPACT: Failure of cardiovascular support treatment increases the risk of mortality in very low birth weight infants. A predictive model built with machine learning techniques can help anticipate treatment response to dobutamine with high accuracy. Predictive models based on artificial intelligence may guide the clinicians in the decision-making process.

Tolerability of an Individualized Physical Rehabilitation Program in Patients Dependent on Inotropic Support With End-Stage Chronic Heart Failure.

Aim      To assess the tolerability of an individualized physical rehabilitation program (PRP) in inotrope-dependent patients with end-stage chronic heart failure (CHF).Material and methods  This prospective randomized study included 120 men aged 18-65 years with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30 % and blood pressure ≥90 / 60 mm Hg. Patients who have received dobutamine or dopamine for ≥2 weeks were randomized into two groups: group 1, 40 patients who participated in the PRP and group 2, 40 patients who did not participate in the PRP. Group 3 included 40 patients without inotropic support who participated in the PRP.Results Patients of groups 1 and 3 attended >80 % of the scheduled classes without developing life-threatening adverse events (AEs) associated with exercise (E). After 6 months of the study, the exercising patients achieved a comparable (average) E intensity: 44 [35; 50]% and 45 [40;52]% of heart rate reserve and Borg scale scores 14 [12; 14] and 13 [11; 14] in groups 1 and 3, respectively (p>0.05). Initially, after 3 and 6 months at the peak of physical activity in groups 1 and 3, there was no decrease in arterial blood oxygen saturation according to pulse oximetry (SpO2) <93 %. At baseline, lactate levels in central venous blood at rest were normal in all groups. After 6 months, the lactate concentration was 1.1 mmol / l in group 1, 2.3 mmol / l in group 2, and 1.4 mmol / l in group 3 (р1-2=0.005; p2-3=0.008, respectively). At the E peak at baseline, after 3 and 6 months, comparable increases in lactate not exceeding 3 mmol / l were detected in groups 1 and 3.Conclusion      The study allowed assessment of the tolerability of individualized PRP performed at the aerobic level of energy supply, in inotropic-dependent patients with CHF. Individualized 6-month PRP in inotropic-dependent patients with end-stage CHF, provided safety criteria are met, is well tolerated and does not increase the number of AEs associated with CHF and physical rehabilitation (PR). Continued inotropic support with dopamine or dobutamine should not be considered as a contraindication to PR in patients with CHF in the absence of E intolerance or life-threatening AEs.

[Prospective study on the influence of dobutamine on blood perfusion in free flap repair of diabetic foot wounds].

Objective: To investigate the influence of clinical administration of dobutamine on blood perfusion in free flap repair of diabetic foot wounds. Methods: A prospective self-controlled study was conducted. From January to November 2022, 20 patients with diabetic foot who met the inclusion criteria were hospitalized in the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, including 9 males and 11 females, aged from 44 to 75 years, with the foot wounds area ranging from 5 cm×4 cm to 20 cm×10 cm, which were repaired by free anterolateral thigh flaps. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded before anesthesia induction, 10 minutes after vascular recanalization, when the target blood pressure (i.e., MAP being 6-10 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) higher than that before anesthesia induction) was reached after infusion of dobutamine, and 10 minutes after tracheal catheter removal. Additionally, indocyanine green, a contrast agent, was injected intravenously at 10 minutes after vascular recanalization and when the target blood pressure was reached after infusion of dobutamine to assess flap blood perfusion using infrared imager, and the area ratio of flaps with hyperperfusion and hypoperfusion was calculated. Other recorded variables included flap harvesting area, surgical duration, total fluid infusion amount, infusion dose and total usage of dobutamine, intraoperative adverse events, postoperative flap complications, and follow-up outcomes. Data were statistically analyzed with paired sample t test, analysis of variance for repeated measurement, Bonferroni method, and generalized estimating equation. Results: Compared with those before anesthesia induction, HR and MAP of patients were significantly decreased at 10 minutes after vascular recanalization (P<0.05), while HR and MAP of patients were significantly increased when the target blood pressure was reached after infusion of dobutamine (P<0.05). Compared with those at 10 minutes after vascular recanalization, HR and MAP of patients were significantly increased when the target blood pressure was reached after infusion of dobutamine and at 10 minutes after tracheal catheter removal (P<0.05). Compared with those when the target blood pressure was reached after infusion of dobutamine, HR and MAP of patients were significantly decreased at 10 minutes after tracheal catheter removal (P<0.05). The area ratio of flaps with hyperperfusion of patients was 0.63±0.11 when the target blood pressure was reached after infusion of dobutamine, which was significantly higher than 0.31±0.09 at 10 minutes after vascular recanalization (t=-9.92, P<0.05). The area ratio of flaps with hypoperfusion of patients was 0.12±0.05 when the target blood pressure was reached after infusion of dobutamine, which was significantly lower than 0.45±0.10 at 10 minutes after vascular recanalization (t=17.05, P<0.05). The flap harvesting area of patients was (174±35) cm², the surgical duration was (372±52) min, the total fluid infusion amount was (2 485±361) mL, the infusion dose of dobutamine was 3-13 µg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹, and the total usage of dobutamine was 5.7 (2.1, 9.7) mg. Two patients showed a significant increase in MAP during the infusion of dobutamine compared with that at 10 minutes after vascular recanalization, but before reaching 6 mmHg higher than that before anesthesia induction, their HR had reached the maximum (over 130 beats/min). The HR gradually returned to around 90 beats/min after the infusion of dobutamine was stopped. On post operation day 2, one patient had partial necrosis at the distal part of the flap, which was repaired by transplantation of thin split-thickness skin graft from the opposite thigh. During the follow-up of 3 to 6 months after operation, all the flaps survived well, with soft texture and well-formed shape, and no adverse cardiovascular events of patients were reported. Conclusions: The administration of dobutamine in free flap repair of diabetic foot wounds can significantly improve the MAP of patients, expand the area of hyperperfusion, reduce the area of hypoperfusion, and enhance the flap viability, with promising short-term follow-up results, which is suitable for promotion in clinical applications.

The choice of perioperative inotropic support impacts the outcome of small infants undergoing complex cardiac surgery: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Vaso-inotropic agents are frequently used to prevent and/or treat low cardiac output syndrome in infants undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. Due to the lack of comparative studies, their use is largely dependent on physician- and center preferences. The aim was to assess the impact of two different inotropic regimens, milrinone-epinephrine versus dobutamine on postoperative morbi-mortality in young children undergoing complex cardiac surgery. METHODS: All consecutive children younger than one year of age admitted for complex cardiac surgery (Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery-1 [RACHS-1] score ≥3) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) from January 2008 to December 2018 were included. Children received either milrinone in association with low dose epinephrine (milrinone-epinephrine group) or dobutamine (dobutamine group) groups were matched and compared using a propensity score. Our primary outcome was a composite measure including either hospital death and/or the presence of at least two of the following events: respiratory failure, prolonged inotropic support, or renal failure. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty patients were included in the analysis. Children in the milrinone-epinephrine group (N.=184) suffered more frequently from a cyanotic heart disease and had longer surgery, CPB, and aortic cross clamp times than those in the dobutamine group (N.=66). After matching, children in the milrinone-epinephrine group had a higher incidence of severe postoperative morbidity or mortality compared to those in the dobutamine group (27.4 versus 13.9%; P=0.016). Respiratory failure (28% vs. 12%), prolonged inotropic support (71% vs. 35%) and in-hospital death (3 vs. 0%) were more frequent in the milrinone-epinephrine group. CONCLUSIONS: In young infants undergoing complex cardiac surgery, milrinone combined with epinephrine is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative morbidity or mortality compared to dobutamine for perioperative inotropic support. Further prospective randomized studies are required to confirm this finding.

A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Levosimendan on Cardiac Function and Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the effect of levosimendan on cardiac function and outcomes in patients with sepsis. Method: We searched multiple databases including CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, WOS, PubMed, EMbase, and The Cochrane Library up to February 2023. We targeted RCTs comparing levosimendan with dobutamine as a control for treating sepsis. After a rigorous screening and quality evaluation, 18 studies were selected for meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.4. Results: Out of 18 studies involving 980 sepsis patients, the meta-analysis revealed the following for the levosimendan group compared to dobutamine: (1) A significant reduction in mortality rate (OR = 0.63, 95% CI (0.42,0.95), P = .03). (2) Shortened ICU stay (MD = -2.55, 95% CI (-3.12, -1.98), P < .00001). (3) Increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD = 6.05, 95%CI (5.28, 6.81), P < .00001) and cardiac index (CI) (MD = 0.47, 95%CI (0.35, 0.59), P < .00001). (4) Decreased blood lactate (Lac) (MD = -1.31, 95%CI (-1.73, -0.90), P < .00001) and troponin I (TnI) levels (MD = -0.43, 95%CI (-0.66, -0.21), P = .0002). (5) Reduced incidence of adverse events (OR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.23,0.81), P = .008). Conclusions: Compared to dobutamine, levosimendan substantially enhances cardiac function in sepsis patients, leading to improved outcomes and fewer adverse events.

THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VASOPRESSORS FOR SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS.

ABSTRACT: Background: Septic shock is a distributive shock with decreased systemic vascular resistance and MAP. Septic shock contributes to the most common causes of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Current guidelines recommend the use of norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor, whereas adrenergic agonists and vasopressin analogs are also commonly used by physicians. To date, very few studies have synthetically compared the effects of multiple types of vasoactive medications. The aim of this study was to systemically evaluate the efficacy of vasoactive agents both individually and in combination to treat septic shock. Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched up to May 12, 2022, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of different types of vasopressors. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was the ICU length of stay. Adverse events are defined as any undesirable outcomes, including myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmia, peripheral ischemia, or stroke and cerebrovascular events. Findings: Thirty-three randomized controlled trials comprising 4,966 patients and assessing 8 types of vasoactive treatments were included in the network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve provided a ranking of vasoactive medications in terms of 28-day all-cause mortality from most effective to least effective: norepinephrine plus dobutamine, epinephrine, vasopressin, terlipressin, norepinephrine, norepinephrine plus vasopressin, dopamine, and dobutamine. Dopamine was associated with a significantly shorter ICU stay than norepinephrine, terlipressin, and vasopressin, whereas other vasoactive medications showed no definite difference in ICU length of stay. Regarding adverse events, norepinephrine was associated with the highest incidences of myocardial infarction and peripheral ischemia. Dopamine was associated with the highest incidence of cardiac arrhythmia. Epinephrine and terlipressin were associated with the highest incidences of myocardial infarction and peripheral ischemia. Interpretation: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that norepinephrine plus dobutamine is associated with a lower risk of 28-day mortality in septic shock patients than other vasoactive medications, and the use of dopamine is associated with a higher risk of 28-day mortality due to septic shock than norepinephrine, terlipressin, and vasopressin.

Characteristics, management, and outcomes of active cancer patients with cardiogenic shock.

AIMS: Characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with active cancer admitted for cardiogenic shock remain largely unknown. This study aimed to address this issue and identify the determinants of 30-day and 1-year mortality in a large cardiogenic shock cohort of all aetiologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: FRENSHOCK is a prospective multicenter observational registry conducted in French critical care units between April and October 2016. 'Active cancer' was defined as a malignancy diagnosed within the previous weeks with planned or ongoing anticancer therapy. Among the 772 enrolled patients (mean age 65.7 ± 14.9 years; 71.5% male), 51 (6.6%) had active cancer. Among them, the main cancer types were solid cancers (60.8%), and hematological malignancies (27.5%). Solid cancers were mainly urogenital (21.6%), gastrointestinal (15.7%), and lung cancer (9.8%). Medical history, clinical presentation, and baseline echocardiography were almost the same between groups. In-hospital management significantly differed: patients with cancers received more catecholamines or inotropes (norepinephrine 72% vs. 52%, P = 0.005 and norepinephrine-dobutamine combination 64.7% vs. 44.5%, P = 0.005), but had less mechanical circulatory support (5.9% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.016). They presented a similar 30-day mortality rate (29% vs. 26%) but a significantly higher mortality at 1-year (70.6% vs. 45.2%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, active cancer was not associated with 30-day mortality but was significantly associated with 1-year mortality in 30-day survivors [HR 3.61 (1.29-10.11), P = 0.015]. CONCLUSION: Active cancer patients accounted for almost 7% of all cases of cardiogenic shock. Early mortality was the same regardless of active cancer or not, whereas long-term mortality was significantly increased in patients with active cancer.

The effect of dobutamine treatment on salvage of digital replantation and revascularization.

PURPOSE: One of the most common causes of a failure after replantation and revascularization surgeries is 'no reflow' from proximal artery that occurs, especially following crush and avulsion injuries. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of dobutamine treatment on salvage of replanted and revascularized digits. METHODS: The patients with no reflow phenomenon detected in the salvage operations of replanted/revascularized digits between the years 2017 and 2020 were included in the study. Dobutamine treatment was infused at a rate of 4 µg·kg-1·min-1 intraoperatively and of 2 µg·kg-1 min-1 postoperatively. Demographic data (age, sex), digit survival rate, ischemia time, and level of injury were retrospectively analysed. Pre-infusion, intraoperative and postoperative values of cardiac index (CI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded. RESULTS: The phenomenon of 'no reflow' was encountered in 35 digits of 22 patients who underwent salvage surgery due to vascular compromise. The survival rate in the revascularization group was 75%, while it was 42.1% in the replanted digits. Metaphysis level of proximal phalanx was the most common localization for 'no reflow' phenomenon. The least values of CI, MAP and HR to obtain sufficient perfusion in salvaged digits were as follows: 4.2 l.min-1.m-2, 76 mm Hg, and 83 beat·min-1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It was demonstrated that dobutamine infusion at a rate of 4 µg·kg-1·min-1 intraoperatively and at 2 µg·kg-1·min-1 postoperatively has favorable effects on the vascular compromise derived from no reflow of proximal artery.

Improved mortality and haemodynamics with milrinone in cardiogenic shock due to acute decompensated heart failure.

AIMS: Studies in cardiogenic shock (CS) often have a heterogeneous population of patients, including those with acute myocardial infarction and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS). The therapeutic profile of milrinone may benefit patients with ADHF-CS. We compared the outcomes and haemodynamic trends in ADHF-CS receiving either milrinone or dobutamine. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients presenting with ADHF-CS (from 2014 to 2020) treated with a single inodilator (milrinone or dobutamine) were included in this study. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and haemodynamic parameters were collected. The primary endpoint was 30 day mortality, with censoring at the time of transplant or left ventricular assist device implantation. A total of 573 patients were included, of which 366 (63.9%) received milrinone and 207 (36.1%) received dobutamine. Patients receiving milrinone were younger, had better kidney function, and lower lactate at admission. In addition, patients receiving milrinone received mechanical ventilation or vasopressors less frequently, whereas a pulmonary artery catheter was more frequently used. Milrinone use was associated with a lower adjusted risk of 30 day mortality (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.77). After propensity-matching, the use of milrinone remained associated with a lower mortality (hazard ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.96). These findings were associated with improved pulmonary artery compliance, stroke volume, and right ventricular stroke work index. CONCLUSIONS: The use of milrinone compared with dobutamine in patients with ADHF-CS is associated with lower 30 day mortality and improved haemodynamics. These findings warrant further study in future randomized controlled trials.

Management and clinical outcomes of cardiogenic shock in King Abdulaziz University Hospital: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess frequencies of various management approaches in cardiogenic shock (CS) and their clinical outcomes. Cardiogenic shock is a state of organ hypoperfusion and hypoxia caused by cardiac failure. METHODS: In this retrospective record review, we assessed the presentations, vital signs, laboratory readings, and treatments for 188 consecutive CS inpatients from 2010-2021. Patients were labeled as "ischemic CS" or "non-ischemic CS" based on the occurrence of myocardial infarction as the precipitating cause, and "post-operative CS" if they had undergone cardiac surgery. In-hospital mortality was the primary endpoint of the study. RESULTS: We identified 118 (62.8%) ischemic, 64 (34%) non-ischemic, and 6 (3.2%) postoperative CS patients. The study population had a high mortality rate (85.1%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that dopamine (p=0.040) and epinephrine (p=0.001) were independent predictors of mortality, while dobutamine (p=0.004) and digoxin (p=0.044) associated with increased survival. No significant association with mortality was found between either PCI or IABP. No significant difference in mortality was observed between CS subgroups. CONCLUSION: Variations in outcomes occurred with different medications. Mortality was higher in patients receiving dopamine or epinephrine and lower in those receiving dobutamine or digoxin. Implementation of clinical trials for investigation of the mortality benefit observed with dobutamine can serve towards formulation of new guidelines for improvement of CS mortality rates.

Patient-, Clinician-, and Institution-level Variation in Inotrope Use for Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Observational Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the risks and benefits of inotropic therapies during cardiac surgery, and the extent of variation in clinical practice remains understudied. Therefore, the authors sought to quantify patient-, anesthesiologist-, and hospital-related contributions to variation in inotrope use. METHODS: In this observational study, nonemergent adult cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass were reviewed across a multicenter cohort of academic and community hospitals from 2014 to 2019. Patients who were moribund, receiving mechanical circulatory support, or receiving preoperative or home inotropes were excluded. The primary outcome was an inotrope infusion (epinephrine, dobutamine, milrinone, dopamine) administered for greater than 60 consecutive min intraoperatively or ongoing upon transport from the operating room. Institution-, clinician-, and patient-level variance components were studied. RESULTS: Among 51,085 cases across 611 attending anesthesiologists and 29 hospitals, 27,033 (52.9%) cases received at least one intraoperative inotrope, including 21,796 (42.7%) epinephrine, 6,360 (12.4%) milrinone, 2,000 (3.9%) dobutamine, and 602 (1.2%) dopamine (non-mutually exclusive). Variation in inotrope use was 22.6% attributable to the institution, 6.8% attributable to the primary attending anesthesiologist, and 70.6% attributable to the patient. The adjusted median odds ratio for the same patient receiving inotropes was 1.73 between 2 randomly selected clinicians and 3.55 between 2 randomly selected institutions. Factors most strongly associated with increased likelihood of inotrope use were institutional medical school affiliation (adjusted odds ratio, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.39 to 27.8), heart failure (adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.46 to 2.76), pulmonary circulation disorder (adjusted odds ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.58 to 1.87), loop diuretic home medication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.69), Black race (adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.68), and digoxin home medication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.86). CONCLUSIONS: Variation in inotrope use during cardiac surgery is attributable to the institution and to the clinician, in addition to the patient. Variation across institutions and clinicians suggests a need for future quantitative and qualitative research to understand variation in inotrope use affecting outcomes and develop evidence-based, patient-centered inotrope therapies.

Scorpion envenomation-associated myocarditis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Scorpion envenomation is associated with several complications. One of the most serious complications is the cardiac involvement in the form of myocarditis that remains the main reason for mortalities associated with scorpion envenomation. The present review aims to elucidate clinical and paraclinical findings associated with scorpion-related myocarditis, and to explore different management strategies and subsequent outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles related to keywords of myocarditis associated with scorpion envenomation up to May 1, 2022. Each article was carefully reviewed by two independent researchers. In case of disagreement for inclusion, we sought a third researcher opinion. RESULTS: A total of 703 cases from 30 case reports and 34 case series were included in our review. Myocarditis associated with scorpion envenomation was usually reported in children presenting with cardiopulmonary symptoms including pulmonary edema (60.7%) and shock or hypotension (45.8%). The most common ECG findings are sinus tachycardia (82%) followed by ST-T changes (64.6%). The management typically included inotropes (especially dobutamine), prazosin, diuretics, nitroglycerine and digoxin, when indicated. Mechanical ventilation was required in 36.7% of the patients. Mortality in confirmed scorpion-related myocarditis cases is estimated at 7.3%. Almost all survived cases showed rapid recovery and improvement in the left ventricular function. CONCLUSION: Even though myocarditis associated with scorpion envenomation is rare, it remains a serious and in some of cases a fatal consequence of scorpion sting. In case of relative presentations, particularly in envenomed children, diagnosis of myocarditis should be considered. Early screening using serial cardiac markers and echocardiography can guide the treatment. Prompt treatment that focuses on cardiogenic shock and pulmonary edema usually results in a favorable outcome.

Do vasoactive medications impact donor hearts clinical outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation?

OBJECTIVES: There is limited data examining donor vasopressor and/or inotrope medications (vasoactives) on pediatric orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) outcomes. We aim to evaluate the effects of vasoactives on pediatric OHT outcomes. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was retrospectively reviewed from January 2000 to March 2018 for donor hearts. Exclusion criteria included multiorgan transplants and recipient age >18. Donors receiving vasoactives at the time of procurement were compared to donors not on vasoactives, including the number of vasoactives and the type. End-points of interest were survival at 30 days and 1 year as well as post-transplant rejection at 1 year. Logistic and Cox models were used to quantify survival end-points. RESULTS: Of 6462 donors, 3187 (49.3%) were receiving at least one vasoactive. Comparing any vasoactive medication versus none, there was no difference in 30-day survival (p = .27), 1 year survival (p = .89), overall survival (p = .68), or post-transplant rejection (p = .98). There was no difference in 30-day survival for donors receiving 2 or more vasoactive infusions (p = .89), 1 year survival (p = .53), overall survival (p = .75), or post-transplant rejection at 1 year (p = .87). Vasopressin was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (OR = 0.22; p = .028), dobutamine with decreased 1-year mortality (OR = 0.37; p = .036), overall survival (HR = 0.51; p = .003), and decreased post-transplant rejection (HR = 0.63; p = .012). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in pediatric OHT outcomes when the cardiac donor is treated with vasoactive infusions at procurement. Vasopressin and dobutamine were associated with improved outcomes. This information can be used to guide medical management and donor selection.

Does donor treatment with inotropes and/or vasopressors impact post-transplant outcomes?

PURPOSE: The purpose was to evaluate the effects of the most commonly used cardiac donor inotropes/vasopressors on subsequent post-heart transplant survival. METHODS: Adult heart transplant recipients from January 2000 to June 2022 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Exclusion criteria included: multiorgan transplants, donor age < 15, and recipient age < 18. Donors receiving vasoactive medications at the time of procurement were compared to donors not receiving these medications. Those on vasoactive medications were stratified by medication: phenylephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine, the combination of these agents, and the concomitant administration of vasopressin with any single agent alone or in combination. The primary area of interest was short-and-long-term survival. Survival at 30 days, 1 year, and long-term (Median = 13.6 years) was compared using logistic and Cox models to quantify survival endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 45,198 donors met inclusion criteria and had data on the use of vasoactive agents available. Mean donor age was 32.3 years with 71% male. Vasoactive medications and potential combinations included phenylephrine in 8156 donors (18.0%), dopamine in 9550 (21.1%), dobutamine in 718 (1.6%), epinephrine in 332 (.73%), and norepinephrine in 4854 (10.7%). A total of 25,856 donors (57.2%) were receiving vasopressin at the time of procurement. There was no impact of donor inotropes on 30-day survival. Donors receiving one inotrope and no vasopressin were associated with increased 1 year mortality (OR 1.14; p = .021), as were donors receiving 2+ inotropes and no vasopressin (OR 1.26; p = .006). For individual agents, 1 year mortality was increased for dopamine (OR 1.11; p = .042) and epinephrine (OR 1.59; p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in heart transplant recipient survival at 30 days when the donor is receiving inotropes without vasopressin at the time of procurement. Inotropic support without vasopressin is associated with greater 1 year mortality. The impact of donor inotropic support on long term heart transplant survival, and the interaction with vasopressin warrants further study.

[Fluid and vasopressor therapy in sepsis]. / Volumen- und vasoaktive Therapie bei Sepsis.

Sepsis is one of the most common and lethal conditions in intensive care medicine. Besides adequate treatment of the infection, timely hemodynamic management is essential to treat tissue hypoperfusion due to sepsis. Adequate fluid resuscitation plays a central role, and this should be carried out with dynamic monitoring of the hemodynamic response. However, a positive fluid balance is associated with poor outcome. Vasopressor therapy is required in case of inadequate response to fluid resuscitation, with norepinephrine considered the first choice. With increasing norepinephrine dose, addition of hydrocortisone or vasopressin may contribute to maintaining the hemodynamic state, although the prognostic advantage of these drugs has not been demonstrated. While dobutamine may be considered in patients with septic cardiomyopathy, the evidence for inotropic therapy in sepsis is limited.

Efficacy of Levosimendan in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Septic Cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the effects of levosimendan and dobutamine on hemodynamics and clinical efficacy in patients with severe septic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤35%). DESIGN: A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study. SETTING: In Baoding, China. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with severe septic cardiomyopathy treated in the authors' hospital's Department of Critical Medicine from September 2018 to September 2021 were enrolled in this study. INTERVENTIONS: These patients were divided randomly into the levosimendan group and dobutamine group. The LVEF, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), systemic vascular resistance index, heart rate, norepinephrine dose, and lactate at the time of enrollment and the 24th hour were compared, along with myocardial injury markers on the third day, C-reactive protein, mechanical ventilation time, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, cost, and 28-day mortality. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At the 24th hour after treatment, CI, LVEF, SVI, and fluid volume were found to be higher in the levosimendan group than in the dobutamine group, whereas the dose of norepinephrine was lower in the former rather than the latter group. On the third day of treatment, cardiac troponin I in the levosimendan group was lower than that in the dobutamine group. Although the differences in 28-day mortality, ICU stay, and ICU treatment cost between the groups were not statistically significant, the ventilator application time of the levosimendan group was significantly shorter than that of the dobutamine group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with dobutamine, levosimendan was more effective at improving cardiac function, reducing myocardial injury, and reducing mechanical ventilation time in patients with severe septic cardiomyopathy.

Meta-analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Dobutamine Versus Milrinone in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.

This study aims to evaluate the difference between dobutamine and milrinone in patients presenting with acute decompensated heart failure (AHF). Inotropes are indicated for treating AHF, especially in patients with concomitant hypoperfusion indicative of cardiogenic shock. However, previous studies have not identified the optimal inotrope. We sought to compare outcomes associated with milrinone versus dobutamine in patients with AHF. A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant trials from inception to August 2021. Our primary outcome of interest was mortality. Analysis was sub-categorized according to subpopulation, including AHF, AHF with cardiogenic shock (AHF-shock), AHF with a bridge to transplantation, and AHF with destination therapy. Summary effects were calculated using a fixed-effects model as risk ratio or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals for all the clinical endpoints. Ten studies, including one randomized controlled trial with 21,106 patients, were included in the analysis (4918 patients were in the Milrinone group, while 15188 were in the Dobutamine group). Milrinone was associated with a lower risk of mortality in patients with AHF (relative risk 0.87; confidence interval :0.79-0.97; P < 0.05, heterogeneity I²â€¯= 0%) with event rates of 9.4% vs 9.8% (number needed to treat of 250). Milrinone was also associated with improved mortality with relative risk 0.76 (0.79-0.95; P < 0.05) in patients with AHF with destination therapy. There was a non-significant trend towards improved mortality in AHF-shock patients. However, AHF with a bridge to transplantation patients had a non-significant trend towards improved mortality with dobutamine. There was no difference between the 2 strategies for the outcomes of acute kidney injury, initiation of renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, arrhythmias, symptomatic hypotension, and length of hospital stay in the overall population. Intensive care unit length of hospital stay was lower in AHF-shock patients in the milrinone group, whereas dobutamine was associated with a lower length of intensive care unit stay in AHF patients. The cumulative data comparing milrinone with dobutamine indicate an overall marginal benefit of milrinone compared to dobutamine in the totality of patients with AFH with or without cardiogenic shock, and whether or not they are bridged to transplantation or destination assist device. More appropriately powered prospective studies are needed to identify a conclusive benefit of one inotrope over another.

Arrhythmic Events and Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock on Inotropic Support: Results of the DOREMI Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Inotropic support is widely used in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS). Existing data on the incidence and significance of arrhythmic events in patients with CS on inotropic support is at high risk of bias. METHODS: The Dobutamine Compared to Milrinone (DOREMI) trial randomized patients to receive dobutamine or milrinone in a double-blind fashion. Patients with and without arrhythmic events (defined as arrhythmias requiring intervention or sustained ventricular arrhythmias) were compared to identify factors associated with their occurrence, and to examine their association with in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (47.9%) had arrhythmic events, occurring equally with dobutamine and milrinone (P = 0.563). The need for vasopressor support at initiation of the inotrope and a history of atrial fibrillation were positively associated with arrhythmic events, whereas predominant right ventricular dysfunction, previous myocardial infarction, and increasing left ventricular ejection fraction were negatively associated with them. Supraventricular arrhythmic events were not associated with mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.40; P = 0.879) but were positively associated with resuscitated cardiac arrests and hospital length of stay. Ventricular arrhythmic events were positively associated with mortality (RR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.13-2.43; P = 0.026) and resuscitated cardiac arrests. Arrhythmic events were most often treated with amiodarone (97%) and electrical cardioversion (27%), which were not associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant arrhythmic events occur in approximately one-half of patients with CS treated with dobutamine or milrinone and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Five factors may help to identify patients most at risk of arrhythmic events.