Genomic landscape of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm can predict response to hypomethylating agent therapy.

There are currently no known predictors of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative overlap neoplasm (MPN) patients' response to hypomethylating agents (HMA). Forty-three patients with MDS/MPN who were treated with HMA during chronic phase and had next-generation sequencing using the established 63-genes panel were identified. Complete and partial remission and marrow response were assessed based on the MDS/MPN International Working Group response criteria. On univariate analysis, younger age, higher number of mutations, and mutations in SETBP1, RUNX1, or EZH2 were associated with no response. Multivariable analysis for modeling response were conducted via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression approach, and showed that mutations in SETBP1, RUNX1, or EZH2 predict lack of HMA response. While limited by sample size, our findings suggest that genomic landscape can potentially identify MDS/MPN patients with lower likelihood of response to HMA.

Response to azacitidine in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia according to overlap myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms criteria.

BACKGROUND: Azacitidine (AZA) is approved for the treatment of high-risk chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) of myelodysplastic (MD) subtype. Data of response rates using the specific response criteria for this disease are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response to AZA in patients diagnosed with CMML from the Spanish Registry of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) applying the overlap myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) response criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 91 patients with CMML treated with at least one cycle of AZA from the Spanish Registry of MDS. As it was a real-world study, the response rate was evaluated between cycle 4 and 6, applying the MDS/MPN response criteria FINDINGS: The overall response rate at cycle 4-6 was 58%. Almost half of the patients achieved transfusion independence and one quarter showed clinical benefit, regardless of the CMML French-American-British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) subtypes and CMML Specific Prognosis Scoring (CPSS) risk groups. Toxicity was higher in the MD-CMML subtype. INTERPRETATION: In our series, most CMML patients achieved an overall response rate with AZA according to the overlap-MDS/MPN response criteria regardless of the CMML FAB and WHO subtypes and CPSS risk groups. Thus, AZA may also be a treatment option for patients with the myeloproliferative CMML subtype and those with a lower-risk CPSS, but symptomatic.

Treatment outcomes for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis.

Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) is characterized by anemia, ring sideroblast erythroid precursors, and persistent thrombocytosis. Case reports suggest lenalidomide may be effective in treating MDS/MPN-RS-T. We evaluated a large series of patients with MDS/MPN-RS-T to compare hematological improvement (HI) response rates among different drug therapies including lenalidomide. We identified 167 patients with MDS/MPN-RS-T. Among the patients tested, 84% had SF3B1 mutations and 43% had JAK2 V617F mutations. The median OS for the cohort was 81 months. Overall, 76 patients (46%) received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), 47 patients (28%) received lenalidomide, and 45 patients (27%) received hypomethylating agents (HMAs). The HI rates were 58%, 53%, and 24%, respectively. The median duration of treatment was 11 months for lenalidomide compared to 6 months for HMAs. Rates of HI improvement were higher in patients with MDS/MPN-RS-T treated with ESAs or lenalidomide, in comparison to those treated with HMAs.

Exploring redox vulnerabilities in JAK2V617F-positive cellular models

ABSTRACT Background: In Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) models, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are elevated and have been implicated in genomic instability, JAK2/STAT signaling amplification, and disease progression. Although the potential effects of ROS on the MPN phenotype, the effects of ruxolitinib treatment on ROS regulation have been poorly explored. Herein, we have reported the impact of ruxolitinib on redox signaling transcriptional network, and the effects of diphenyleneiodonium (DPI), a pan NOX inhibitor, in JAK2V617F-driven cellular models. Method: Redox signaling-related genes were investigated in SET2 cells upon ruxolitinib treatment by RNA-seq (GEO accession GSE69827). SET2 and HEL cells, which represent JAK2V617F-positive MPN cellular models with distinct sensitivity to apoptosis induced by ruxolitinib, were used. Cell viability was evaluated by MTT, apoptosis by annexin V/PI and flow cytometry, and cell signaling by quantitative PCR and Western blot. Main results: Ruxolitinib impacted on a network composed of redox signaling-related genes, and DUOX1 and DUOX2 were identified as potential modulators of ruxolitinib response. In SET2 and HEL cells, DPI reduced cell viability and, at low doses, it significantly potentiated ruxolitinib-induced apoptosis. In the molecular scenario, DPI inhibited STAT3, STAT5 and S6 ribosomal protein phosphorylation and induced PARP1 cleavage in JAK2V617F-positive cells. DPI combined with ruxolitinib increased PARP1 cleavage in SET2 cells and potentiated ruxolitinib-reduced STAT3, STAT5 and S6 ribosomal protein in HEL cells. Conclusion: Our study reveals a potential adaptation mechanism for resistance against ruxolitinib by transcriptionally reprogramming redox signaling in JAK2V617F cells and exposes redox vulnerabilities with therapeutic value in MPN cellular models.

Clinical analysis and literature review of a case with the myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis.

Objective: Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) is a new disease entity in the 2016 WHO classification, characterized by anemia, thrombocytosis and bone marrow ring sideroblasts. We herein reported a case of MDS/MPN-RS-T and discuss its clinical characteristics. Methods: A 69-year-old woman presented to our hospital with recurrent dizziness and fatigue. Hematologic investigations, bone marrow analysis and genomic DNA sequencing studies were performed. Results: Peripheral blood testing showed normocytes anemia and thrombocytosis, and bone marrow analysis revealed hypercellular with clusters of megakaryocytes and 95% ring sideroblasts (RS). She had a normal karyotype and was found to have SF3B1 mutations. Decitabine therapy produced a clinical response and disease remission in this patient. Conclusions: Our report provides a definite conceptual framework for a better understanding of the characteristics of MDS/MPN-RS-T.

Giant-cell arteritis associated with myelodysplastic syndrome: French multicenter case control study and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) can be associated with giant cell arteritis (GCA). In this nationwide study by the "French Network of dysimmune disorders associated with hemopathies" (MINHEMON) the objective was to evaluate characteristics, treatment and outcome of GCA MDS-MDS/MPN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients that presented a MDS or MDS/MPN associated with GCA. Treatment efficiency, relapse-free and overall survival of GCA MDS-MDS/MPN were compared to GCA alone. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with GCA MDS-MDS/MPN were included with median age 76 [42-92], M/F ratio 2.5, 8 MDS with multilineage dysplasia (38%), 4 chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (19%), at low or intermediate risk according to IPPS and IPSS-R. The prevalence of headaches, jaw claudication and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy was significantly lower in patients with GCA MDS-MDS/MPN compared to idiopathic GCA (14.3%, 0% and 0% versus 30%, 25%, and 25%, respectively; p < .05). Other clinical and histology findings were similar. All GCA patients received steroid therapy as first-line treatment. Complete or partial response was observed in 14 GCA MDS-MDS/MPN patients (66.7%), of whom 6 (28.6%) received combined immunosuppressive therapies (versus 10% of idiopathic GCA; p = .07). Relapse incidence was similar in the two groups. Steroid dependence was more frequent among GCA MDS-MDS/MPN patients (12 (57%) versus 18 (22.5%); p < .05). Relapse-free and steroid-free survivals were significantly decreased in GCA MDS-MDS/MPN patients (log rank 0.002 and 0.049 respectively), but not overall survival. CONCLUSION: Characteristics of GCA MDS-MDS/MPN seem different than idiopathic GCA, with a distinct clinical phenotype and poorer outcome with a higher risk of steroid dependence and relapse.

NPM1 mutations define a specific subgroup of MDS and MDS/MPN patients with favorable outcomes with intensive chemotherapy.

Nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutations are common in acute myeloid leukemia and are associated with high remission rates and prolonged survival with intensive chemotherapy. NPM1 mutations are rare in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN), and the clinical outcomes of these patients, when treated with intensive chemotherapy, are unknown. We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathologic characteristics and the impact of therapy in 31 patients with MDS or MDS/MPN and NPM1 mutations. Next-generation sequencing was performed at diagnosis in 22 patients. Median age was 62 years (range, 19-86). Twenty-four patients (77%) had normal karyotype, and all had multilineage dysplasia. Most patients could be classified as MDS with excess blasts (19/31, 61%). NPM1 mutations were detected at a median allele frequency of 0.38 (range, 0.09-0.49). Mutation burden did not correlate with bone marrow blast frequency, and its clearance seemed to be associated with decreased morphologic dysplasia. Ten of the 31 patients (32%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 20 (65%) hypomethylating agents, and 1 (4%) lenalidomide. Sequential sequencing was available in 16 (52%) patients, and mutation burden correlated with disease status and response to therapy. Patients treated with chemotherapy had higher complete response rates (90% vs 28%, P = .004), longer median progression-free survival (not reached vs 7.5 months, P = .023), and overall survival (not reached vs 16 months, P = .047). Intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) may be associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with NPM1-mutated MDS or MDS/MPN who are candidates for this form of therapy.

Myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative neoplasms: updates on the overlap syndromes.

Myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) is a rare and distinct group of myeloid neoplasms with overlapping MDS and MPN features. Next generation sequencing studies have led to an improved understanding of MDS/MPN disease biology by identifying recurrent somatic mutations. Combining the molecular findings to patho-morphologic features has improved the precision of diagnosis and prognostic models in MDS/MPN. We discuss and highlight these updates in MDS/MPN nomenclature and diagnostic criteria per revised 2016 WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms in this article. There is an ongoing effort for data integration allowing for comprehensive genomic characterization, development of improved prognostic tools, and investigation for novel therapies using an international front specific for MDS/MPN. In this article, we discuss updates in prognostic models and current state of treatment for MDS/MPN.

A phase II trial of ruxolitinib in combination with azacytidine in myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Ruxolitinib and azacytidine target distinct disease manifestations of myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPNs). Patients with MDS/MPNs initially received ruxolitinib BID (doses based on platelets count), continuously in 28-day cycles for the first 3 cycles. Azacytidine 25 mg/m2 (Day 1-5) intravenously or subcutaneously was recommended to be added to each cycle starting cycle 4 and could be increased to 75 mg/m2 (Days 1-5) for disease control. Azacytidine could be started earlier than cycle 4 and/or at higher dose in patients with rapidly proliferative disease or with elevated blasts. Thirty-five patients were treated (MDS/MPN-U, n =14; CMML, n =17; aCML, n =4), with a median follow-up of 15.2 months (range, 1.0-41.5). All patients were evaluable by the 2015 international consortium proposal of response criteria for MDS/MPNs (ICP MDS/MPN) and 20 (57%) responded. Nine patients (45%) responded after the addition of azacytidine. A greater than 50% reduction in palpable splenomegaly at 24 weeks was noted in 9/14 (64%) patients. Responders more frequently were JAK2-mutated (P = .02) and had splenomegaly (P = .03) compared to nonresponders. New onset grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 (51%) and 19 (54%) patients, respectively, but required therapy discontinuation in only 1 (3%) patient. Patients with MDS/MPN-U had better median survival compared to CMML and aCML (26.5 vs 15.1 vs 8 months; P = .034). The combination of ruxolitinib and azacytidine was well-tolerated with an ICP MDS/MPN-response rate of 57% in patients with MDS/MPNs. The survival benefit was most prominent in patients with MDS/MPN-U.

An updated review of the JAK1/2 inhibitor (ruxolitinib) in the Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Ruxolitinib (Rux), a JAK1/2 inhibitor, has been approved for patients with myelofibrosis and in polycythemia vera with inadequate response/intolerance to hydroxycarbamide. Studies have demonstrated that Rux improves disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly. A late emerging observation from two Phase III trials was that Rux was associated with survival advantage in comparison with placebo or other available therapies in myelofibrosis. Important data suggest that for polycythemia vera Rux improved control of blood counts. Main hematological side effects are anemia and thrombocytopenia predominantly at the beginning of the treatment. Some studies and case reports highlighted potential risks of nonmelanoma skin cancers and increased risk of infection including reactivation of hepatitis B, tuberculosis or herpes zoster infections after Rux treatment.

3q26/EVI1 rearrangement in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms: An early event associated with a poor prognosis.

3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements resulting in EVI1 overexpression play an important role in leukemogenesis and are associated with treatment resistance and a poorer prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myeloid leukemia and BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. In this study, we aim to explore the clinicopathological features of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN) neoplasms with 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements and determine the potential impact of these cytogenetic abnormalities on treatment response and survival. The study group included 12 cases of MDS/MPN with 3q26.2 rearrangements detected by conventional karyotyping. There were 7 men and 5 women with a median age of 67 years (range, 51-79 years) at time of initial MDS/MPN diagnosis. Ten cases were classified as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and 2 were MDS/MPN, unclassifiable. Among CMML cases, 5 (50%) were proliferative type and 5 (50%) were dysplastic type. Based on blast counts, these 10 CMML were: CMML-0 (n = 2), CMML-1 (n = 3), and CMML-2 (n = 5). Eleven (92%) patients had 3q26 rearrangements at the initial diagnosis. Inv(3)(q21q26.2) was most common, identified in 7(58%) patients, followed by t(3;21)(q26.2;q22) in 2 patients and 1 patient each with t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), t(2;3)(p21;q26-27), and t(3;6)(q26.2;q26). Six (50%) patients had 3q26.2 rearrangements as a sole cytogenetic abnormality and 6 (50%) patients had additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Molecular studies revealed DNMT3A mutations in all 3 patients assessed and RAS mutations in 2 of 8 (25%) patients. No mutations in ASXL1 (n = 3), TET2 (n = 3), FLT3 ITD/D835 (n = 10), and CEBPA (n = 7) were detected. Most patients received hypomethylating agent based chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 11.5 months (range, 1.5-24 months) and at time of last follow-up, 11 (92%) died with a median survival of 13.4 months (range, 1.5-24 months). The only patient alive had a relatively short follow-up of 2.4 months and showed disease progression at the last visit. In conclusion, 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements are a rare event and usually present at time of initial diagnosis in MDS/MPN. The presence of 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements in MDS/MPN is associated with rapid disease progression, poor response to treatment, and a poor prognosis.

Randomized phase 2 study of low-dose decitabine vs low-dose azacitidine in lower-risk MDS and MDS/MPN.

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) improve survival in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) but are less well-studied in lower-risk disease. We compared the safety and efficacy of low-dose decitabine vs low-dose azacitidine in this group of patients. Adults with low- or intermediate 1-risk MDS or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, according to the International Prognostic Scoring System, were randomly assigned using a Bayesian adaptive design to receive either azacitidine 75 mg/m2 intravenously/subcutaneously daily or decitabine 20 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 3 consecutive days on a 28-day cycle. The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR). Between November 2012 and February 2016, 113 patients were treated: 40 (35%) with azacitidine and 73 (65%) with decitabine. The median age was 70 years; 81% of patients were intermediate 1-risk patients. The median number of cycles received was 9. The ORRs were 70% and 49% (P = .03) for patients treated with decitabine and azacitidine, respectively. Thirty-two percent of patients treated with decitabine became transfusion independent compared with 16% of patients treated with azacitidine (P = .2). Cytogenetic response rates were 61% and 25% (P = .02), respectively. With a median follow-up of 20 months, the overall median event-free survival was 18 months: 20 and 13 months for patients treated with decitabine and azacitidine, respectively (P = .1). Treatment was well tolerated, with a 6-week mortality rate of 0%. The use of low-dose HMAs is safe and effective in patients with lower-risk MDS and MDS/MPN. Their effect on the natural history of lower-risk disease needs to be further studied. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT01720225).

Evaluation of efficacy of alemtuzumab in 5 patients with aplastic anemia and/or myelodysplastic neoplasm.

Patients with aplastic anemia or hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) may respond to immunosuppressive therapy, including the anti-CD52 antibody alemtuzumab. We analyzed treatment responses to alemtuzumab in 5 patients with MDS or aplastic anemia (AA) evolving to MDS. Two patients with hypoplastic MDS (hMDS) showed a partial response (PR) to alemtuzumab. In both responding patients, a concomitant paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) clone was detected before therapy. One responder relapsed after 15 months and underwent successful allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Both patients are still alive and in remission after 40 and 20 months, respectively. The other patients showed no response to alemtuzumab. One patient died from pneumonia 4 months after treatment. In summary, our data confirm that alemtuzumab is an effective treatment option for a subset of patients with MDS, even in the presence of a PNH clone.