Listening to patients, for the patients: The COVAD Study-Vision, organizational structure, and challenges.

BACKGROUND: The pandemic presented unique challenges for individuals with autoimmune and rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) due to their underlying condition, the effects of immunosuppressive treatments, and increased vaccine hesitancy. OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune diseases (COVAD) study, a series of ongoing, patient self-reported surveys were conceived with the vision of being a unique tool to gather patient perspectives on AIRDs. It involved a multinational, multicenter collaborative effort amidst a global lockdown. METHODS: Leveraging social media as a research tool, COVAD collected data using validated patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The study, comprising a core team, steering committee, and global collaborators, facilitated data collection and analysis. A pilot-tested, validated survey, featuring questions regarding COVID-19 infection, vaccination and outcomes, patient demographics, and PROs was circulated to patients with AIRDs and healthy controls (HCs). DISCUSSION: We present the challenges encountered during this international collaborative project, including coordination, data management, funding constraints, language barriers, and authorship concerns, while highlighting the measures taken to address them. CONCLUSION: Collaborative virtual models offer a dynamic new frontier in medical research and are vital to studying rare diseases. The COVAD study demonstrates the potential of online platforms for conducting large-scale, patient-focused research and underscores the importance of integrating patient perspective into clinical care. Care of patients is our central motivation, and it is essential to recognize their voices as equal stakeholders and valued partners in the study of the conditions that affect them.

Expanding the role of CAR T-cell therapy: From B-cell hematological malignancies to autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a form of immunotherapy where the lymphocytes, mostly T-cells, are redirected to specifically recognize and eliminate a target antigen by coupling them with CARs. The binding of CAR and target cell surface antigens leads to vigorous T cell activation and robust anti-tumor immune responses. Areas of implication of CAR T-cell therapies include mainly hematological malignancies (i.e., advanced B-cell cancers); however, recent studies have proven the unprecedented success of the new immunotherapy also in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. We aim to review the recent advances in CAR T-cell therapies in rheumatology but also to address the limitations of their use in the real clinical practice based on the data on their efficacy and safety.

Pregnancy and the Autoimmune Patient.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article will review the current understanding of the immunologic changes that occur during pregnancy. It will discuss the impact of pregnancy on the disease activity of autoimmune or inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD). Lastly, it will highlight the most recent data on pre-conception and pregnancy management practices that can improve pregnancy outcomes in autoimmune patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Pregnancy is an immunologically complex and dynamic state that may affect the activity of AIRDs, with more patients having active disease during pregnancy than previously thought. Uncontrolled inflammatory diseases are associated with poor pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, small for gestational age infants, and prematurity. Pre-conception counseling and early pregnancy planning discussions can help ensure optimal disease control and medication management prior to attempting conception. Adequate control of AIRDs on pregnancy-compatible medications during the pre-conception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods is required for optimal pregnancy outcomes.

Incidence and disease burden of autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases after non-pharmaceutical interventions in the COVID-19 era: A nationwide observational study in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Infections are considered risk factors for autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRDs), the incidence of which is considered to have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) on the incidence of AIRDs and their associated health care services and medical expenses in Korea was investigated. METHODS: We included all AIRD cases reported between January 2016 and February 2021 based on the National Health Insurance Service data. We evaluated changes in incidence trends for each AIRD before and after NPI implementation (Feb 2020 to Feb 2021) using segmented regression analysis. Changes in health care utilization and medical costs for each AIRD before and after NPI implementation were also investigated. RESULTS: After NPI implementation, monthly incidence rates declined significantly by 0.205 per 1 000 000 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.308 to -0.101, p < .001) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). No significant changes in the incidence of all AIRDs other than SLE were observed before and after implementation. Further, annual outpatient department visits per patient were lower during implementation for all diseases, except juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The prescription days per outpatient visit increased significantly during implementation for all diseases, except JIA and ankylosing spondylitis. During implementation, the total annual medical costs per patient tended to decrease for all diseases, except JIA and mixed connective tissue disease. CONCLUSION: Implementation of NPIs to contain the pandemic led to a reduction in the incidence of SLE and changed patterns of medical care utilization and treatment cost for most AIRDs.

Exploring paediatric rheumatology care: a ten-year retrospective analysis of the patient population in Ghana.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic diseases can seriously impact children's general health, development, and growth. However, due to a lack of resources, paediatric rheumatology is a largely underdeveloped speciality in many African nations. Children with rheumatic disorders face obstacles in accessing specialized medical care, including lack of specialists, care centres, medication access, and limited research and education to increase understanding of paediatric rheumatic disease among healthcare practitioners. This study described the disease characteristics, prevalence, and challenges faced by paediatric rheumatic disease patients receiving care at a teaching hospital in Accra, Ghana. METHODS: A retrospective record-based study was conducted among all paediatric cases presenting to the rheumatology clinic of the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) from January 2011 to December 2021. Data collected include clinical features, laboratory findings at disease presentation, andtherapeutic regimens prescribed per standard guidelines and experiences. RESULTS: A total of 121 cases were identified as of 2021, indicating a point prevalence of 0.0011%. The majority (73%) were females with a mean age of 13.4 ± 3.2 years. The mean duration of symptoms in months experienced by patients before being successfully referred to a rheumatologist was 18 months. There were significant differences between referred and confirmed diagnoses, especially in cases involving mixed connective tissue diseases (MCTD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), suggesting that these conditions may be under-recognised. Arthralgia and arthritis were the most common presenting symptoms. More than three-quarters (86.8%) of the cases studied were treated with steroids (oral or intravenous). In cases requiring immunosuppressive therapy, methotrexate was the most commonly prescribed in 33.9% of instances. Mortality was recorded at 8.3%, with the majority involving SLE cases. Most (95.7%) of the primary caregivers expressed positive experiences regarding care received at the adult rheumatology clinic. CONCLUSION: There were significant delays in diagnosis and diagnostic accuracy for patients with paediatric rheumatic disease (PRD). This highlights the pressing need for strengthening paediatric rheumatology services in Africa, including increasing awareness about these conditions among the public and healthcare providers to improve early diagnosis and quality of life for children with these conditions.

[Patient education in rheumatology]. / Éducation thérapeutique du patient en rhumatologie.

In Switzerland, patient education in rheumatology faces challenges, despite national advances following the development of the concept of self-management support by the Federal Office of Health. Yet it is a fundamental pillar of rheumatic disease management, meeting the needs of both patients and healthcare professionals. It helps to improve the overall quality of care and is recommended by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). Training in PE needs to be strengthened, as does the evaluation of programmes, which must take account of the specific nature of rheumatic diseases. An integrated, patient-centered approach is essential to overcome these obstacles and promote PE in rheumatology.

En Suisse, l'éducation thérapeutique du patient (ETP) en rhumatologie rencontre des défis malgré des avancées nationales à la suite de l'élaboration du concept de soutien à l'autogestion par l'Office fédéral de la santé publique. C'est pourtant un pilier fondamental de la prise en charge des maladies rhumatismales répondant aux besoins à la fois des patients et des professionnels de la santé. Elle permet une amélioration globale de la qualité des soins et est recommandée par l'Alliance européenne des associations de rhumatologie (EULAR). La formation en ETP nécessite d'être renforcée, tout comme l'évaluation des programmes devant intégrer la spécificité des pathologies rhumatismales. Une approche intégrée et axée sur le patient est essentielle pour surmonter ces obstacles et promouvoir l'ETP en rhumatologie.

Development and evaluation of shared decision-making tools in rheumatology: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision-making (SDM) tools are facilitators of decision-making through a collaborative process between patients/caregivers and clinicians. These tools help clinicians understand patient's perspectives and help patients in making informed decisions based on their preferences. Despite their usefulness for both patients and clinicians, SDM tools are not widely implemented in everyday practice. One barrier is the lack of clarity on the development and evaluation processes of these tools. Such processes have not been previously described in the field of rheumatology. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and evaluation processes of shared decision-making (SDM) tools used in rheumatology. METHODS: Bibliographic databases (e.g., EMBASE and CINAHL) were searched for relevant articles. Guidelines for the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews were followed. Studies included were: addressing SDM among adults in rheumatology, focusing on development and/or evaluation of SDM tool, full texts, empirical research, and in the English language. RESULTS: Of the 2030 records screened, forty-six reports addressing 36 SDM tools were included. Development basis and evaluation measures varied across the studies. The most commonly reported development basis was the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria (19/36, 53 %). Other developmental foundations reported were: The Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) (6/36, 16 %), Informed Medical Decision Foundation elements (3/36, 8 %), edutainment principles (2/36, 5.5 %), and others (e.g. DISCERN and MARKOV Model) (9/31,29 %). The most commonly used evaluation measures were the Decisional Conflict Scale (18/46, 39 %), acceptability and knowledge (7/46, 15 %), and the preparation for decision-making scale (5/46,11 %). CONCLUSION: For better quality and wider implementation of such tools, there is a need for detailed, transparent, systematic, and consistent reporting of development methods and evaluation measures. Using established checklists for reporting development and evaluation is encouraged.

OMERACT Core outcome measurement set for shared decision making in rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review to identify candidate instruments.

OBJECTIVES: Shared decision making (SDM) is a central tenet in rheumatic and musculoskeletal care. The lack of standardization regarding SDM instruments and outcomes in clinical trials threatens the comparative effectiveness of interventions. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) SDM Working Group is developing a Core Outcome Set for trials of SDM interventions in rheumatology and musculoskeletal health. The working group reached consensus on a Core Outcome Domain Set in 2020. The next step is to develop a Core Outcome Measurement Set through the OMERACT Filter 2.2. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) to identify candidate instruments for the OMERACT Filter 2.2 We systematically reviewed five databases (Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science). An information specialist designed search strategies to identify all measurement instruments used in SDM studies in adults or children living with rheumatic or musculoskeletal diseases or their important others. Paired reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text articles. We extracted characteristics of all candidate instruments (e.g., measured construct, measurement properties). We classified candidate instruments and summarized evidence gaps with an adapted version of the Summary of Measurement Properties (SOMP) table. RESULTS: We found 14,464 citations, read 239 full text articles, and included 99 eligible studies. We identified 220 potential candidate instruments. The five most used measurement instruments were the Decisional Conflict Scale (traditional and low literacy versions) (n=38), the Hip/Knee-Decision Quality Instrument (n=20), the Decision Regret Scale (n=9), the Preparation for Decision Making Scale (n=8), and the CollaboRATE (n=8). Only 44 candidate instruments (20%) had any measurement properties reported by the included studies. Of these instruments, only 57% matched with at least one of the 7-criteria adapted SOMP table. CONCLUSION: We identified 220 candidate instruments used in the SDM literature amongst people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Our classification of instruments showed evidence gaps and inconsistent reporting of measurement properties. The next steps for the OMERACT SDM Working Group are to match candidate instruments with Core Domains, assess feasibility and review validation studies of measurement instruments in rheumatic diseases or other conditions. Development and validation of new instruments may be required for some Core Domains.

Rehabilitation of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and comorbidities: unmet needs.

Comorbidities may contribute to inadequate response to therapy and accelerate disability in various rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Cardiovascular, oncological, and infectious comorbidities are common in rheumatic patients. The rehabilitation of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) with comorbidities requires a multidisciplinary approach to improving patients' functional mobility, slowing down the disease progression and minimizing the risks of complications. The evidence suggests that cardiac rehabilitation can be implemented in daily practice in patients with IRDs to reduce mortality for those with established risk factors. Physical exercises reduce the severity, improve the clinical course, and reduce hospitalization rates in patients with rheumatic diseases. A rehabilitation program with focused physical therapy can lead to functional improvements and reduction of disease activity in patients with lowered quality of life (QoL). Health professionals should provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with rheumatic diseases and comorbidities to initiate the self-management of their diseases and prevent complications.

Effects of exercise on depression in patients with rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of exercise intervention on depression in rheumatic diseases by means of a meta-analysis. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PubMed, and relevant records were searched. The qualities of randomized controlled trials were evaluated. Meta-analysis of the obtained related data was completed using RevMan 5.3. Heterogeneity was also evaluated with χ2 test and I2. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were reviewed. Compared with baseline, the meta-analysis results showed that there was significant difference in the improvement of depression assessed by HADs, BDI, CES­D, and AIMS in patients with rheumatic diseases (post exercise vs. baseline, -0.73 [-1.05, -0.4], P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). In subgroup analysis, although none of these trends in BDI and CES­D subgroups were significant at P < 0.05, there were clear trends towards improvement in depression. CONCLUSION: As an alternative or supplementary treatment, the effect of exercise on rheumatism is obvious. Rheumatologists can consider exercise as an integral part of the treatment of patients with rheumatism.

Global Perspective on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Rheumatology and Health Equity.

Although the public health emergency associated with the COVID-19 pandemic has ended, challenges remain, especially for individuals with rheumatic diseases. We aimed to assess the historical and ongoing effects of COVID-19 on individuals with rheumatic diseases and rheumatology practices globally, with specific attention to vulnerable communities and lessons learned. We reviewed literature from several countries and regions, including Africa, Australia and New Zealand, China, Europe, Latin America, and the US. In this review, we summarize literature that not only examines the impact of the pandemic on individuals with rheumatic diseases, but also research that reports the lasting changes to rheumatology patient care and practice, and health service use. Across countries, challenges faced by individuals with rheumatic diseases during the pandemic included disruptions in health care and medication supply shortages. These challenges were associated with worse disease and mental health outcomes in some studies, particularly among those who had social vulnerabilities defined by socioeconomic, race, or rurality. Moreover, rheumatology practice was impacted in all regions, with the uptake of telemedicine and changes in health care utilization. While many regions developed rapid guidelines to disseminate scientific information, misinformation and disinformation remained widespread. Finally, vaccine uptake among individuals with rheumatic diseases has been uneven across the world. As the acute phase of the pandemic wanes, ongoing efforts are needed to improve health care access, stabilize rheumatology drug supplies, improve public health communication, and implement evidence-based vaccination practices to reduce COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among individuals with rheumatic diseases.

The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on rheumatic disease patients' satisfaction with access to medical services.

The COVID-19 hurt various lifestyle aspects, especially the treatment and follow-up of patients with chronic diseases such as autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (RD). The new circumstances changed the frequency of medical examinations and the way patients with rheumatic diseases are followed up. The objective is to study the impact of COVID-19 on RD patients' satisfaction with access to medical services. A national multicenter observational cross-sectional anonymous online survey was conducted on patients with RD using a specially developed web-based platform and structured questionnaire https://rheumatologycovid19.bg/ . The study was carried out with the support of intra-university project №6/2022 MU-Plovdiv. 1288 patients participated, with an average age of 47.03 (SD ± 12.80 years), of whom 992 (81.6%) were women. The questionnaire contained 41 questions grouped into 5 panels. Descriptive statistics were used-mean, alternative analysis, logistic regression and Decision Tree using the CRT (classification and regression trees) method. The study found that RD patients' satisfaction with access to medical services was influenced by communication type and the frequency of visits to the rheumatologist, difficulties in prescribing and finding medicines and the presence of comorbidities. The likelihood of patients' satisfaction with their rheumatologist was 5.5 and 3 times higher for in-person and other means of communication, respectively, compared to those without any communication. The relative share of patients who communicated by phone was larger (59%) compared to pre-pandemic (41%), where direct contact with the physician prevailed (80%). The results of the study confirmed the need to optimize remote access to medical care for patients with RD during the pandemic.