Racial Disparities in Outcomes After Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Racial disparities are a major issue in health care but the overall extent of the issue in spinal surgery outcomes is unclear. We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis of disparities in outcomes among patients belonging to different racial groups who had undergone surgery for degenerative spine disease. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Review Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to January 20, 2021 for relevant articles assessing outcomes after spine surgery stratified by race. We included studies that compared outcomes after spine surgery for degenerative disease among different racial groups. RESULTS: We found 30 studies that met our inclusion criteria (28 articles and 2 published abstracts). We included data from 20 cohort studies in our meta-analysis (3,501,830 patients), which were assessed to have a high risk of observation/selection bias. Black patients had a 55% higher risk of dying after spine surgery compared with white patients (relative risk [RR], 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.87; I2 = 70%). Similarly, black patients had a longer length of stay (mean difference, 0.93 days; 95% CI, 0.75-1.10; I2 = 73%), and higher risk of nonhome discharge (RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.47-1.81; I2 = 89%), and 30-day readmission (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-2.04; I2 = 96%). No significant difference was noted in the pooled analyses for complication or reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients have a significantly higher risk of unfavorable outcomes after spine surgery compared with white patients. Further work in understanding the reasons for these disparities will help develop strategies to narrow the gap among the racial groups.

Short term outcomes associated with patients requiring blood transfusion following elective laminectomy and fusion for lumbar stenosis: A propensity-matched analysis.

Perioperative blood transfusion has been associated with poor outcomes but the impacts of transfusion after fusion for lumbar stenosis have not been well-described. We assessed this effect in a large cohort of patients from 2012 to 2018 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). We evaluated baseline characteristics including demographics, comorbidities, hematocrit, and operative characteristics. We generated propensity scores using baseline characteristics and patients were matched to approximate randomization. We assessed odds of 30-day outcomes including prolonged length-of-stay (LOS), complications, discharge to facility, readmission, reoperation, and death using logistic regression. We identified 16,329 eligible patients who underwent lumbar fusion for stenosis; 1,926 (11.8%) received a transfusion. Before matching, there were multiple differences in baseline covariates including age, gender, BMI, ASA class, medical comorbidities, hematocrit, coagulation indices, platelets, operative time, fusion technique, number of levels fused, and osteotomy. However, after matching, no significant differences remained. In the matched cohorts, transfusion was associated with increased prolonged LOS (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.45-1.91, p < 0.001), minor complication (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.20-2.12, p = 0.001), major complication (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.16-1.98, p = 0.003), any complication (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.24-1.92, p < 0.001), discharge to facility (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.48-1.95, p < 0.001), 30-day readmission (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.23-1.99, p < 0.001), and 30-day reoperation (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.35-2.53, p < 0.001). Although transfusion is performed based on perceived clinical need, this study contributes to growing evidence that it is important to balance the risks of perioperative blood transfusion with its benefits.

Impact of Frailty on Outcomes Following Spine Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of 668 Patients.

BACKGROUND: With an aging population, elderly patients with multiple comorbidities are more frequently undergoing spine surgery and may be at increased risk for complications. Objective measurement of frailty may predict the incidence of postoperative adverse events. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between preoperative frailty and postoperative spine surgery outcomes including mortality, length of stay, readmission, surgical site infection, and venous thromboembolic disease. METHODS: As part of a system-wide quality improvement initiative, frailty assessment was added to the routine assessment of patients considering spine surgery beginning in July 2016. Frailty was assessed with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), and patients were categorized as nonfrail (RAI 0-29) or prefrail/frail (RAI ≥ 30). Comparisons between nonfrail and prefrail/frail patients were analyzed using Fisher's exact test for categorical data or by Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous data. RESULTS: From August 2016 through September 2018, 668 patients (age of 59.5 ± 13.3 yr) had a preoperative RAI score recorded and underwent scheduled spine surgery. Prefrail and frail patients suffered comparatively higher rates of mortality at 90 d (1.9% vs 0.2%, P < .05) and 1 yr (5.1% vs 1.2%, P < .01) from the procedure date. They also had longer in-hospital length of stay (LOS) (3.9 d ± 3.6 vs 3.1 d ± 2.8, P < .001) and higher rates of 60 d (14.6% vs 8.2%, P < .05) and 90 d (15.8% vs 9.8%, P < .05) readmissions. CONCLUSION: Preoperative frailty, as measured by the RAI, was associated with an increased risk of readmission and 90-d and 1-yr mortality following spine surgery. The RAI can be used to stratify spine patients and inform preoperative surgical decision making.

Revision surgery and mortality following complex spine surgery: 2-year follow-up in a prospective cohort of 679 patients using the Spine AdVerse Event Severity (SAVES) system.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the 2-year risk of revision surgery and all-cause mortality after complex spine surgery, and to assess if prospectively registered adverse events (AE) could predict either outcome. Revision surgery and mortality are serious complications to spine surgery. Previous studies of frequency have mainly been retrospective and few studies have employed competing risk survival analyses. In addition, assessment of predictors has focused on preoperative patient characteristics. The effect of perioperative AEs on revision and all-cause mortality risks are not fully understood. METHODS: Between January 1 and December 31, 2013, we prospectively included all patients undergoing complex spine surgery at a single, tertiary institution. Complex spine surgery was defined as conditions deemed too complicated for surgery at a secondary institute, or patients with severe comorbidities requiring multidisciplinary observation and treatment. AEs were registered using the Spine Adverse Event Severity system and patients were followed for minimum 2 years regarding revision surgery and all-cause mortality. Incidences were estimated using competing risk survival analyses and correlation between AEs and either outcome was assessed using proportional odds models. RESULTS: We included a complete and consecutive cohort of 679 adult and pediatric patients. Demographics, surgical data, AEs, and events of revision or all-cause mortality were registered. The cumulative incidence of 2-year all-cause revision was 19% (16-22%) and all-cause mortality was 15% (12-18%). Deformity surgery was the surgical category with highest incidence of revision and the highest incidence of all-cause mortality was seen in the tumor group. Across surgical categories, cumulative incidences of 2-year revision ranged between 11% (tumor) and 33% (deformity), whilst 2-year all-cause mortality ranged between 3% (deformity) and 33% (tumor). We found that major intraoperative AEs were associated to increased odds of revision. Deep wound infection was associated to increased odds of all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We report the cumulative incidences of revision surgery and all-cause mortality following complex spine surgery. We found higher incidences of revision compared to previous retrospective studies. Prospectively registered AEs were correlated to increased odds of revision surgery and all-cause mortality. These results may serve as reference for future interventional studies and aid in identifying at-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

How is the microbial diagnosis of bacterial vertebral osteomyelitis performed? An 11-year retrospective study.

Vertebral osteomyelitis (VOM) is often diagnosed with delays, resulting in poorer outcomes. Microbial documentation is particularly challenging and obtained using blood cultures (BCs) and vertebral biopsies (VBs; CT-guided or surgical). We retrospectively analysed VOM cases in a tertiary reference centre between 2004 and 2015, focusing on how and how quickly microbiological diagnosis was performed. Among 220 VOM, 88.2% had documentation, including Gram-positive cocci (GPC) (70.6%), Gram-negative rods (GNR) (9.3%), anaerobes (3.6%), polybacterial infections (6.7%) and tuberculosis (9.8%). BCs were performed in 98.2% and positive in 59.3%, identifying most GPC (80.3%) and half of GNR (54.6%). VBs were performed in fewer cases (37.7%), but were more frequently positive (68.8% for CT-guided and 81.0% for surgical biopsies). They documented all anaerobes (100.0%), most M. tuberculosis (84.2%) and polybacterial infections (76.9%), and GNR (45.4%). Extra-vertebral samples highly contributed to tuberculosis diagnosis (52.6%, and 15.8% as the only positive sample). Documentations most often followed radiological diagnosis (53.4%). They were obtained earlier by BCs than by VB after first clinical symptoms (median of 14 versus 51 days). Antibiotic treatments were mostly initiated after samplings (88.0%). BCs allow the documentation of most VOM and should be performed without delay in case of clinical or radiological suspicion; however, they may miss 1 out of 5 GPC and 1 out of 2 GNR. VBs have a higher positivity rate and should be rapidly performed if negative BCs. It is likely that delayed and missed diagnoses result from the insufficient use of VB.

Time-to-completed-imaging, survival and function in patients with spinal epidural abscess: Description of a series of 34 patients, 2015-2018.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare and life-threatening infection with increasing incidence over the past two decades. Delays in diagnosis can cause significant morbidity and mortality among patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe trends in time-to-imaging and intervention, risk factors, and outcomes among patients presenting to the emergency department with SEA at a single academic medical center in Portland, Oregon. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from patients with new SEA diagnosis at a single hospital from October 1, 2015 to April 1, 2018. We describe averages to time-to-imaging and interventions, and frequencies of risk factors and outcomes among patients presenting to the emergency department with SEA. RESULTS: Of the 34 patients included, 7 (20%) died or were discharged with plegia during the study period. Those who died or were discharged with plegia (n = 7) had shorter mean time-to-imaging order (20.8 h versus 29.2 h). Patients with a history of intravenous drug use had a longer mean time-to-imaging order (30.2 h versus 23.7 h) as compared to those without intravenous drug use. Patients who died or acquired plegia had longer times from imaging completed to final imaging read (20.9 h versus 7.1 h), but shorter times from final imaging read to surgical intervention among patients who received surgery (4.9 h versus 46.2 h). Further, only three (42.9%) of the seven patients who died or acquired plegia presented with the three-symptom classic triad of fever, neurologic symptoms, and neck or back pain. CONCLUSIONS: SEA is a potentially deadly infection that requires prompt identification and treatment. This research provides baseline data for potential quality improvement work at the study site. Future research should evaluate multi-center approaches for identifying and intervening to treat SEA, particularly among patients with intravenous drug use.

Inaccuracy of standard geriatric scores in nonagenarians following hospitalization for various spinal pathologies.

Demographic trends make it incumbent on spine surgeons to recognize the special challenges involved in caring for older patients. The aim of this study was to identify variables that may predict early mortality in geriatric patients over the age of 90 following elective hospitalization for various spinal pathologies. Retrospective analyses of all patients over the age of 90 years, which were electively treated between 2006 and 2016 at out department for various spinal conditions, were performed. Patient characteristics, type of treatment, and comorbidities were analyzed with regard to the 30-day mortality rate. Twenty-six patients were identified. Mean age was 93 years (range 91-97), 19 (73%) were female. Eighteen (69%) patients were treated operatively. Mean hospital stay was 13 days (range 2-51). Seventeen (65%) patients were on anticoagulation therapy. Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 5.3 (range 1-11); mean diagnosis count (DC) was 8.3 (range 2-17); mean Geriatric Index of Comorbidity (GIC) was 2.8 (range 1-4); and mean comorbidity-polypharmacy score (GPS) was 13.3 (range 5-23). The 30-day mortality rate was 16.7% in the surgically treated group compared with 12.5% in the conservatively treated group (p = 0.9), anticoagulation therapy (p = 0.91), gender (p = 0.49), length of hospital stay (p = 0.33), GIC (p = 0.54), CCI (p = 0.74), GPS (p = 0.82), and DC (p = 0.65) did not correlate with the 30-day mortality rate. Cause of death was pulmonary embolism in two cases and unknown in one case. Thirty-day mortality rate in patients over 90 years old with degenerative spinal diseases is relatively high regardless of the treatment modality. Standard geriatric prognostic scores seem less reliable for these patients.

Treatment outcomes in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis who have cirrhosis.

Early diagnosis and proper treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO) in patients with cirrhosis is challenging to clinicians, and the mortality rate is expected to be high. A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the treatment outcome in PVO patients with cirrhosis and to identify the predictors of their mortality. Mortality was divided into two categories, 30-day and 90-day mortality. A stepwise multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of mortality. Eighty-five patients were identified after initial exclusion. The patients' mean age was 60.5 years, and 50 patients were male. The early mortality rates within 30 and 90 days were 17.6% and 36.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that increased age, CTP class C, and bacteremia at the time of PVO diagnosis were predictors of 30-day mortality, while higher MELD score, presence of combined infection, and multiple spinal lesions were predictors of 90-day mortality. Attention should be paid to the high mortality between 30 and 90 days after PVO diagnosis (18.8%), which was higher than the 30-day mortality. Liver function was consistently a strong predictor of mortality in PVO patients with cirrhosis. The high-risk patients should be targeted for an aggressive diagnostic approach, using spinal MRI and intensive monitoring and treatment strategies.

Symptomatic aneurysmal bone cysts of the spine: clinical features, surgical outcomes, and prognostic factors.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to report the long-term outcomes and analyze the potential prognostic factors that may contribute to symptomatic patients with aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) of the spine undergoing surgical treatments. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with ABCs of the spine was performed. The clinical features were reviewed, and the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors with p values ≤ 0.05 were subjected to multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazards model to identify the independent prognostic contributors. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients with ABCs of the spine were included in the study. All patients received surgical treatments. The mean follow-up period was 41.3 months (median 39.5, range 24-64). Local recurrence was detected in eight patients after surgery in our center, whereas death occurred in three patients. The estimated 5-year DFS and OS rate was 54.1% and 76.8%, respectively. The statistical analyses indicated that both en bloc resection and primary/secondary tumor status were independent prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary ABC status may be associated with worse prognosis, and en bloc resection remains the treatment of choice for ABCs with neurologic deficits or spinal instability of the spine, which is correlated with better prognosis for local tumor control. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Ankylosing Spinal Disease-Diagnosis and Treatment of Spine Fractures.

BACKGROUND: In patients with ankylosing spinal disease, including ankylosing spondylitis and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, even low-impact trauma can lead to complex injuries. The injuries seem to be highly unstable and associated with greater mortality rates compared with the general spine trauma population. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of a consecutive series of 41 patients (34 men, 7 women) with ankylosing spinal disease and unstable traumatic spine injuries who were admitted to our department from 2007 to 2016. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 73.4 ± 12.7 years. Of the 41 patients, 24 (58.5%) had ankylosing spondylitis and 17 (41.5%) had diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Low-velocity accidents were documented in 38 patients (92.7%). The most frequent injuries were type B spine fractures (61.0%). Accompanying spinal epidural hematoma was detected using magnetic resonance imaging in 12 patients (29.3%) but was not found by radiography or computed tomography. Of the 41 patients, 24 (58.5%) presented with American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS) grade E, 6 (14.6%) with grade D, and 8 (19.6%) with grade C or worse. All the patients had undergone internal fixation. All but 1 (97.6%) had received posterior fixation. In 25 (61%), a combined approach was performed. Five patients died of early complications. Of the 36 discharged patients, 11 died during the follow-up period and 1 was lost to follow-up. The surviving 24 patients had a median follow-up of 733 ± 576 days; 21 had AIS grade E, 2 had AIS grade D, and 1 had AIS grade C. CONCLUSIONS: A thorough diagnostic evaluation with multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can reveal injuries that would remain undetected on conventional radiographs. A combined approach or posterior-only fixation seems safe.

Diagnosis and management of spinal infections.

The number of spinal infections has been increasing due to aging populations and larger numbers of immunocompromised hosts and intravenous drug users. Magnetic resonance imaging is a useful tool for the early diagnosis of spinal infections, and can yield positive findings just 3-5 days after disease onset. Before antibiotic administration, cultures must be initiated from blood and from specimens collected from the locus of infection. Based on the pathogens identified by culture, appropriate antibiotics should be selected with careful consideration of antimicrobial susceptibility and spinal tissue penetration. Antibiotic treatment of spinal infections should be continued for longer than for most other types of infections, although the optimal duration remains unknown. The indications for surgical treatment include progressive neurologic deficits, progressive deformity, spinal instability, persistent or recurrent infection, and unbearable pain. In most patients with spinal infection, the gold standard surgical treatment is anterior radical debridement followed by autologous strut bone grafting. The addition of posterior instrumentation has recently become popular. This procedure may be performed alone as an alternative surgical option in patients in poor condition, and if it dramatically reduces pain, subsequent observation may be reasonable. If progressive deformity is observed or pain relief is inadequate after posterior instrumentation, additional anterior debridement and bone grafting should be scheduled.

Risk factors associated with short-term complications and mortality after pediatric spinal arthrodesis.

OBJECTIVE Spinal arthrodesis is routinely performed in the pediatric population. However, there is limited information on the short-term outcomes of pediatric patients who have undergone spine fusion. Thus, the authors conducted a retrospective review of the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to determine the short-term mortality, complication, reoperation, and readmission rates of pediatric patients who underwent spinal arthrodesis for all indications. METHODS The Pediatric NSQIP database was queried for all patients who underwent spinal arthrodesis between 2012 and 2014. Patient demographics, comorbidities, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and operative time were abstracted. Short-term mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates and complications were also noted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to delineate patient risk factors that influence short-term mortality, complications, reoperation, and readmission rates. RESULTS A total of 4420 pediatric patients who underwent spinal fusion were identified. Common indications for surgical intervention included acquired/idiopathic scoliosis or kyphoscoliosis (71.2%) and genetic/syndromic scoliosis (10.7%). The mean patient age was 13.7 ± 2.9 years, and 70% of patients were female. The overall 30-day mortality was 0.14%. Multivariate analysis showed that female sex and pulmonary comorbidities significantly increased the odds of reoperation, with odds ratios of 1.43 and 1.78, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In the NSQIP database for pediatric patients undergoing spinal arthrodesis for all causes, there was a 3.6% unplanned reoperation rate, a 3.96% unplanned readmission rate, and a 9.0% complication rate. This analysis provides data for risk stratification of pediatric patients undergoing spinal arthrodesis, allowing for optimized care.

Pre-operative functional status as a predictor of morbidity and mortality after elective cervical spine surgery.

AIMS: Patients seeking cervical spine surgery are thought to be increasing in age, comorbidities and functional debilitation. The changing demographics of this population may significantly impact the outcomes of their care, specifically with regards to complications. In this study, our goals were to determine the rates of functionally dependent patients undergoing elective cervical spine procedures and to assess the effect of functional dependence on 30-day morbidity and mortality using a large, validated national cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data files from 2006 to 2013 was conducted to identify patients undergoing common cervical spine procedures. Multivariate logistic regression models were generated to analyse the independent association of functional dependence with 30-day outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Patients with lower functional status had significantly higher rates of medical comorbidities. Even after accounting for these comorbidities, type of procedure and pre-operative diagnosis, analyses demonstrated that functional dependence was independently associated with significantly increased odds of sepsis (odds ratio (OR) 5.04), pulmonary (OR 4.61), renal (OR 3.33) and cardiac complications (OR 4.35) as well as mortality (OR 11.08). CONCLUSIONS: Spine surgeons should be aware of the inherent risks of these procedures with the functionally dependent patient population when deciding on whether to perform cervical spine surgery, delivering pre-operative patient counselling, and providing peri-operative management and surveillance. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:824-8.

Complications and operative spine fusion construct length in Parkinson's disease: A nationwide population-based analysis.

There remains a dearth of information regarding the surgical complications following multilevel spine surgery in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. This retrospective cohort study was performed to address this issue on a nationwide level using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2001 to 2012. More than 25 postoperative variables were analyzed to assess the impact of fusion construct length on each variable. Subsequently, the same analysis was performed on admissions without PD. 4301 PD patients with spine fusion were identified, of whom 934 (21.7%) underwent fusion of at least three levels; the remaining 3367 underwent fusion of 1-2 levels. Patients with 3+ level fusions were more likely to suffer paraplegia (P=.001; OR=3.0; 95%CI=1.5-6.1), hematoma/seroma (P=.009; OR=1.9; 95%CI=1.2-3.2), IVC filter placement (P=.018; OR=2.1; 95%CI=1.1-3.9), RBC transfusion (P<.001; OR=3.2; 95%CI=2.7-3.8), PE (P=.027; OR=4.5; 95%CI=1.2-16.9), postoperative shock (P=.023; OR=7.3; 95%CI=1.3-39.6), ARDS (P<.001; OR=4.1; 95%CI=2.7-6.3), VTE (P=.006; OR=2.6; 95%CI=1.3-5.4), acute posthemorrhagic anemia (P<.001; OR=2.0; 95%CI=1.7-2.4), device-related complications (P<.001; OR=3.1; 95%CI=2.3-4.2), and in-hospital mortality (P=.005; OR=3.4; 95%CI=1.5-7.4). 3+ level fusions were also more likely to have LOS>1week (P<.001; OR=2.1; 95%CI=1.8-2.5), and a nonroutine discharge (P=.005; OR=1.9; 95%CI=1.4-2.4). 692,173 non-PD patients with spine fusion were identified; 123,964 (17.9%) underwent 3+ level fusion. Differences between 3+ versus 1-2 level fusions were similar to those in PD patient, but unlike PD patients, postoperative infection was significant while in-hospital mortality, PE and VTE were not. Fusion of at least three levels increased morbidity, mortality, and adverse discharge disposition compared with 1-2 level fusions. Nearly 80% of all spine fusions performed in the United States are fewer than three levels. These findings are worth considering during operative decision-making in both PD and non-PD patients.

Long-term prognosis of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis: Mortality, quality of life, and pain.

BACKGROUND: Hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis (HVO) has a generally favorable prognosis if appropriate treatment is initiated in its early phase; however, some intractable cases with HVO can develop neurological impairment as well as spinal deformity during the course of treatment and these sequelae may lead to impaired quality of life (QOL). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term relapse rate, mortality, and QOL of patients with HVO. METHODS: In this retrospective case series study, medical records of 60 patients with HVO with a mean follow-up period of 8 years (5-23 years) were reviewed to assess demographic data, details of infection, and clinical course. Mortality rate was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier plot. QOL was measured using the EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire and residual pain using a numeric rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: HVO relapsed in 4 of 60 patients (7%). Overall 5-year survival rate in 60 patients with HVO was 85%. The factors associated with increased mortality were malignant tumor, diabetes mellitus, chronic use of glucocorticoids, and drug-resistant strains of staphylococcus. Female-to-male ratio, NRS, prevalence of neurological impairment were significantly higher in patients with low EQ-5D score (poor health) compared to those with high EQ-5D score (good health). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HVO have shorter life expectancy if they have malignancy, diabetes mellitus, chronic use of glucocorticoids, and a history of drug-resistant strains of staphylococcus infection. Female gender, residual neurological defects and persistent back pain are associated with impaired QOL in patients with HVO.

National Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Solid Organ Transplant Undergoing Spinal Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of population-based national hospital discharge data collected for the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. OBJECTIVE: To examine the demographics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with solid organ transplant (SOT) undergoing spinal fusion on a national level. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Solid organ transplantation has become more common in recent years and some of these patients undergo spinal fusion surgery. There is, however, little information regarding the trends and outcomes in such patients. METHODS: Clinical data were derived from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2000 and 2009. Patients with or without SOT who underwent spinal fusion were identified. Data regarding, patient- and healthcare system-related characteristics, comorbidities, in-hospital complications, and mortality were retrieved and analyzed. In-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with or without SOT and analyzed with the use of multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 5984 patients with SOT underwent spinal fusion in the United States during the last decade. From 2000 to 2009, population growth-adjusted incidence of patients with SOT who underwent spinal fusion has increased more than two fold (0.102 in 2000 to 0.236 in 2009, per 100,000, P < 0.001). Comparison between patients with or without SOT showed that patients with SOT had significantly higher overall in-hospital complication rate (22.4% vs. 9.5%) and in-hospital mortality rate (1.3% vs. 0.3%). Graft versus host disease occurred in 0.7% of patients with SOT undergoing spinal fusion. Patients with SOT had a significant higher risk of urinary and renal complications and overall in-hospital complications. CONCLUSION: During the last decade, the incidence of patients with SOT undergoing spinal fusion has increased in the United States. In-hospital outcomes of patients with SOT undergoing spinal fusion were inferior to those of patients without SOT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Inpatient Outcomes in Dialysis-dependent Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate hospital outcomes in dialysis-dependent patients undergoing elective lumbar surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Because of their overall poor health status and concomitant comorbidity burden, spinal surgery in dialysis-dependent patients represents a significant challenge to spine surgeons. Large studies evaluating their immediate postoperative outcomes in elective lumbar surgery are lacking. METHODS: Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample, an estimated 1834 dialysis-dependent patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery for degenerative lumbar conditions were compared to an estimated 2,522,594 non-dialysis-dependent patients undergoing the same procedures between 2002 and 2012. Our primary outcomes measures included postoperative complication rates, hospital length of stay, and total hospital costs. RESULTS: Mean age of dialysis-dependent patients was 64.2 years compared to 59.9 in the non-dialysis-dependent cohort (P < 0.001). Dialysis-dependent patients had substantially higher inpatient mortality rates (1.8% vs 0.1%; P < 0.001), major complication rates (8.1% vs 1.1%; P < 0.001), and an increased need for blood transfusion (18.3% vs 12.5%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that dialysis dependence independently increased odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 8.30; 95% confidence interval 5.78-11.93; P < 0.001) and odds of a major postoperative complication (odds ratio = 3.63; 95% confidence interval 3.49-3.89; P < 0.001). Dialysis dependence was associated with an increased mean length of stay of 3.3 days (P < 0.001) and a significant increase in hospital costs when stratified by procedure type. CONCLUSION: Dialysis dependence is associated with poorer immediate postoperative outcomes and increased hospital costs when compared to non-dialysis-dependent patients. In addition, an increased need for postoperative transfusion should be anticipated in this patient population. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Impact of Smoking on 30-day Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected surgical database. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of smoking on 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of smoking on short-term outcomes after spinal fusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database was performed for the years 2007 to 2013. Patients who underwent spinal fusion for ASD were identified. Thirty-day morbidity and mortality were compared between current smokers and nonsmokers. The independent effect of smoking was investigated via multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1368 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Of the 1368 patients, 15.9% were smokers and 84.1% nonsmokers. The proportion of smokers who developed at least one complication was 9.7% versus 13.6% for nonsmokers (P = 0.119). Major complication rates (including 30-day mortality) were 6.5% for smokers and 8.4% for nonsmokers (P = 0.328). Current smoking status was not associated with increased odds of developing any complication [odds ratio (OR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.47-1.71; P = 0.752] or major complications (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.64-2.70; P = 0.447) after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Smoking was not associated with higher 30-day complications or mortality after corrective surgery for ASD in this study. However, given the negative effects of smoking on overall health and spine surgery outcomes in the long term, smoking cessation before spinal fusion is still recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Does the microendoscopic technique reduce mortality and major complications in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy? A propensity score-matched analysis using a nationwide administrative database.

OBJECTIVE Although minimally invasive spinal surgery has recently gained popularity, few nationwide studies have compared the adverse events that occur during endoscopic versus open spinal surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative complications associated with microendoscopic discectomy (MED) and open discectomy for patients with lumbar disc herniation. METHODS The authors retrospectively extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a national inpatient database in Japan, data for patients admitted between July 2010 and March 2013. Patients who underwent lumbar discectomy without fusion surgery were included in the analysis, and those with an urgent admission were excluded. The authors examined patient age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, body mass index, smoking status, blood transfusion, duration of anesthesia, type of hospital, and hospital volume (number of patients undergoing discectomy at each hospital). One-to-one propensity score matching between the MED and open discectomy groups was performed to compare the proportions of in-hospital deaths, surgical site infections (SSIs), and major complications, including stroke, acute coronary events, pulmonary embolism, respiratory complications, urinary tract infection, and sepsis. The authors also compared the hospital length of stay between the 2 groups. RESULTS A total of 26,612 patients were identified in the database. The mean age was 49.6 years (SD 17.7 years). Among all patients, 17,406 (65.4%) were male and 6422 (24.1%) underwent MED. A propensity score-matched analysis with 6040 pairs of patients showed significant decreases in the occurrence of major complications (0.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.01) and SSI (0.1% vs 0.2%, p = 0.02) in patients treated with MED compared with those who underwent open discectomy. Overall, MED was associated with significantly lower risks of major complications (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.89, p = 0.01) and SSI (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.87, p = 0.03) than open discectomy. There was a significant difference in length of hospital stay (11 vs 15 days, p < 0.001) between the groups. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between MED and open discectomy. CONCLUSIONS The microendoscopic technique was associated with lower risks for SSI and major complications following discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation.