A Historical Review of Headaches: Who First Described Them and When did This Occur?

BACKGROUND: Headache is as old as human history and has been able to report, and the first descriptions were found in Greece and Mesopotamia. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to know the date of the first description of ICHD-3 headaches, with their respective author. METHODS: We searched for articles that addressed the historical aspects of primary and secondary headaches and painful cranial neuropathies. RESULTS: Twenty-seven different headaches were analyzed according to the occurrence of their first description, with the respective author and country of origin. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge of the first description of ICHD-3 headaches, with their respective author, showed us how and when the different headaches appeared over the years.

Auriculotemporal neuralgia.

In this article, the anatomic and physiologic characteristics and clinical syndromes involving the auriculotemporal nerve (ATN) are reviewed. The ATN is a terminal branch of the mandibular nerve (third division of the trigeminal nerve). The syndrome of ATN neuralgia (ATNa), which is characterized by attacks of paroxysmal, moderate to severe pain on the preauricular area, often spreading to the ipsilateral temple, is discussed in this article. The classification of ATNa under the Second Edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, as well as our personal experience in diagnosing and treating this syndrome, also are reviewed.

[The Schmidt and Vernet classical syndrome. Alternating brain stem syndromes that do not exist?]. / Die klassischen Syndrome von Schmidt und Vernet. Alternierende Hirnstammsyndrome, die nicht existieren?

In contrast to the majority of classic brainstem syndromes, the interpretation of Schmidt's syndrome (ipsilateral palsy of the IX, X, XI, and XII cranial nerves with contralateral hemiparesis) and Vernet's syndrome (ipsilateral palsy of the IX, X, and XI nerves with contralateral hemiparesis) is controversial. They are sometimes addressed as crossed brainstem syndromes but also as syndromes due to multiple cranial nerve lesions without contralateral hemiparesis. In this study, the historic descriptions and recent publications about Schmidt's and Vernet's syndromes were reviewed and critically analysed. We conclude that historic descriptions and later publications describe exclusively patients with extracerebral lesions of multiple cranial nerves. "Central" syndromes of Schmidt and Vernet caused by brainstem lesion appear not to exist. An extremely extensive lesion explaining these hypothetical unilateral brainstem syndromes is theoretically possible but, however, was apparently never observed in any of the known unilateral brainstem diseases.

Historical considerations of the diagnosis and treatment of facial pain.

Most forms of facial pain remain neurologic disorders that, although not life threatening, can be debilitating. Modern descriptions of the various forms of facial pain according to their clinical and anatomic patterns did not develop until after the contributions of the early modern neuroanatomists and physiologists in the first quarter of the nineteenth century. These contributions allowed the recognition of relatively distinct painful afflictions of the face, and permitted surgeons in the late nineteenth century to embark confidently on a variety of approaches to cranial and peripheral nerves using decompressive or destructive procedures to alleviate facial pain.

[Raeder's syndrome]. / Raeders syndrom.

Raeder's syndrome was first described by the Norwegian ophthalmologist J.G. Raeder in 1918 and again in 1924 by the same author. The seminal report was a description of a young male patient with unilateral periocular pain combined with ipsilateral miosis and ptosis, and with slight objective signs of trigeminal nerve involvement. Autopsy demonstrated a tumour at the base of the skull in the middle cranial fossa. Raeder coined the term "paratrigeminal" for the reported clinical picture. Later case reports by Raeder and other authors have included patients experiencing a more benign clinical course, some with spontaneous remissions, with unilateral periocular pain and ipsilateral signs of oculosympathetic paresis as the common denominator. This article is a chronological survey of the main contributions to the medical literature. Various definitions of the syndrome are outlined, including the more recent classification, as well as some pathophysiological and prognostic considerations.

Fourth nerve palsy: historical review and study of 215 inpatients.

A review of inpatient trochlear nerve pareses diagnosed over 23 years revealed head trauma as the principal cause, with surgical injury, inflammation, and brain tumors seen occasionally. Ischemic (microvascular) neuropathies were rare. About one-half of the patients (52%) had no other neuro-ophthalmologic signs, but only 5% were truly isolated, without other neurologic or ophthalmologic signs or symptoms. Fourth nerve palsies are underdiagnosed on hospital services, where stuporous patients encounter unsuspecting physicians.

The idiopathic polyradiculoneuropathies: a historical guide to an understanding of the clinical syndromes.

Recognition of the idiopathic polyradiculoneuropathies began with Graves, Landry and Dumenil who, respectively, suggested, implied and established the peripheral nervous system as a site of disease. Over the ensuing decades other neurologists separated the idiopathic disorders from neuropathies of known cause, poliomyelitis and myelopathies. Guillain, Barré and Strohl described the acute benign syndrome and its cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities. Haymaker & Kernohan solidified the features of the acute disorder as did Dyck et al and Prineas & McLeod for the relapsing and chronic conditions. Currently the idiopathic polyradiculoneuropathies are regarded as autoimmune in nature, clinically generalized with some cases having focal involvement, and of varying severity with only occasional fatalities. Neurologists are divided as to whether the acute and chronic disorders represent 2 different conditions or whether they are 2 forms in the spectrum of a single disorder. This author favors the concept of a single disorder with multifarious manifestations.