Radiofrequency ablation of bilateral splanchnic nerves in a 15-year-old patient with visceral abdominal pain cancer.

Pain, a prevalent and debilitating symptom in cancer patients, significantly diminishes the quality of life for both individuals and their families. Addressing this critical issue, our study presents the case of a 15-year-old diagnosed with synchronous multifocal multicentric osteosarcoma. We utilized radiofrequency ablation of bilateral splanchnic nerves, a strategy of multimodal pain and palliative care. This approach not only proved to be safe and effective but also markedly improved the patient's quality of life. Our findings shine a light of hope, emphasizing the paramount importance of innovative pain management in pediatric oncology, especially in the final stages of life. This case report highlights the unwavering dedication to excellence in relieving suffering, offering hope for patients grappling with cancer.

Pain is a common and serious problem for cancer patients, osteosarcoma is a type of bone cancer that often affects children. making life hard for them and their families. We used a therapy called radiofrequency ablation on specific nerves to manage the pain. In the case of the patient's abdominal pain, this therapy was safe, worked well, and greatly improved the patient's quality of life. Our findings show the importance of new pain management methods in helping children with cancer, helping them reduce pain, using fewer strong pain medications and helping children in this case in the final stage of life.

Lidocaine infusion for malignant visceral pain: case report.

BACKGROUND: Visceral pain accounts for nearly 28% of cancer-related pain, and its effective management poses significant challenges. The diverse pathways of neurotransmission, neurotransmitters, channels, and receptors suggest the need for individualized analgesic therapy. Our objective is to explore a therapeutic alternative for managing malignant visceral pain in advanced cancer. CASES: In this report, we present two patients with malignant bowel obstruction and severe visceral pain, despite receiving opioid treatment, necessitating an alternative approach. Surgical interventions were considered but promptly ruled out. Paracentesis was performed as necessary. Pain management was initiated using a combination of opioids and co-analgesics. However, both patients required opioid dose escalation without achieving adequate pain control or tolerating the associated side effects. Consequently, a lidocaine infusion was administered to alleviate pain. OUTCOME: Following 24-48 hours of lidocaine infusion, both patients achieved satisfactory symptom control, enabling a reduction in opioid doses and improvement in intestinal transit. No side effects were reported during the treatment. DISCUSSION: Lidocaine infusions may be beneficial for pain management in patients with malignant bowel obstruction and visceral pain. The extent of pain control achieved in comparison to other therapeutics remains challenging to ascertain. We posit that lidocaine infusions, with their potential impact on visceral hypersensitivity, can enhance pain control and facilitate the recovery of bowel transit. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulation for Refractory Angina Treatment

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of death worldwide, including in Brazil. Angina pectoris is a challenging disease because its clinical manifestation is not always related to the degree of obstruction. Visceral pain fromany source can be totally disabling. It influences all aspects of the life of a patient and it can be one of the main causes of absence from work and of family disruption. Spinal cord electrical stimulation (SCES) has been traditionally applied for the treatment of neuropathic pain, with good to excellent results. Visceral pain syndrome can be as debilitating and disabling as somatic or neuropathic pain; however, there seems to be a lack of consensus on the appropriate treatment and strategies for these disorders. Themajor difference of SCES for visceral pain, compared to postlaminectomy syndrome or to regional complex syndrome, is the number of stimulated dermatomes. In most viscera, the somatotopic arrangement has two to four medullar levels, sometimes requiring laterality. After reviewing the literature, we have concluded that SCES is now a viable, low-risk option with satisfactory results for the treatment of neuropathic and visceral pain; therefore, it can be used in refractory angina after the failure of standard therapy. However, further studies are required to increase the application and efficacy of this procedure in the clinical practice.

Sobrecrecimiento bacteriano como etiología de dolor cronico no oncológico visceral / Small bowel bacterial overgrowth a cause of visceral noncancer chronic pain

El dolor visceral crónico se produce por la distención de los receptores neuronales localizados en las mucosas de los distintos órganos del aparato digestivo, presentándose clínicamente como un dolor con una localización difusa, con intensidad moderada a severa, que se describe generalmente de tipo cólico. Presentamos un caso clínico de una paciente con que consultó por un dolor crónico no oncológico de tipo visceral con componente neuropático, cuya causa etiológica correspondió a sobrecrecimieno bacteriano intestinal. Por lo que debemos considerar esta patología como etiología de un dolor visceral crónico...

Chronic Visceral pain is caused by the distension of neuronal receptors located in the lining the digestive organs, clinically presenting as pain with a diffuse localization and moderate to severe intensity, usually is described colicky. We present a case report a patient who presented with chronic noncancer visceral pain with neuropathic component, which accounted etiology Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. We must consider this disease as a cause of chronic visceral pain...