Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Drug Policy ; 74: 1-10, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31382201

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recreational cannabis has been legalized in 11 states and Washington DC in the US. However, little is known about individual preferences for legal cannabis products. This study estimated the impacts of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), warning messages, and price on preferences for cannabis flowers. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey with discrete choice experiments was implemented in October 2017. A sample of 2400 adults aged 21 years or older were recruited from 6 US states with recreational cannabis legalization, consisting of 1200 past-year nonusers and 1200 past-year users. Each respondent was randomly assigned to 12 discrete choice scenarios, each asking them to choose from an opt-out option and 3 cannabis flower products with varying levels in THC, CBD, warning messages, and price. The impacts of product attributes on individual choices were analyzed with nested logit regressions. RESULTS: Both cannabis nonusers and users preferred higher CBD and lower price. Users also preferred higher THC. The results on warning messages were mixed: graphic warning on drugged driving and text warning message had positive impacts on nonusers' and users' preferences for cannabis flowers, respectively, whereas FDA disapproval disclaimer had negative impacts on nonusers' preferences. Heterogeneities in preferences were revealed among nonusers by former use status and among users by reason of use. Particularly, medical cannabis users were not as responsive to THC as recreational cannabis users or dual users were. Regarding relative importance of the attributes, all respondents but medical cannabis users perceived price as the most important attribute (relative importance 51-64%), whereas medical cannabis users perceived CBD as the most important attribute (relative importance 47%). CONCLUSION: The findings indicated that product characteristics may have influences on US adults' choices of legal cannabis flower products and may deserve consideration for cannabis regulatory framework.


Assuntos
Canabidiol/provisão & distribuição , Comércio/estatística & dados numéricos , Dronabinol/provisão & distribuição , Fumar Maconha/economia , Adulto , Canabidiol/economia , Cannabis/química , Comportamento de Escolha , Comércio/legislação & jurisprudência , Estudos Transversais , Dronabinol/economia , Feminino , Flores , Humanos , Legislação de Medicamentos , Masculino , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Maconha Medicinal/economia , Maconha Medicinal/provisão & distribuição , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rotulagem de Produtos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
2.
Eur J Pain ; 22(3): 440-454, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29134767

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is considerable public and political interest in the use of cannabis products for medical purposes. METHODS: The task force of the European Pain Federation (EFIC) conducted a survey with its national chapters representatives on the status of approval of all types of cannabis-based medicines, the covering of costs and the availability of a position paper of a national medical association on the use of medical cannabis for chronic pain and for symptom control in palliative/supportive care. RESULTS: Thirty-one out of 37 contacted councillors responded. Plant-derived tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol (THC/CBD) oromucosal spray is approved for spasticity in multiple sclerosis refractory to conventional treatment in 21 EFIC chapters. Plant-derived THC (dronabinol) is approved for some palliative care conditions in four EFIC chapters. Synthetic THC analogue (nabilone) is approved for chemotherapy-associated nausea and vomiting refractory to conventional treatment in four EFIC chapters'. Eight EFIC chapters' countries have an exceptional and six chapters an expanded access programme for medical cannabis. German and Israeli pain societies recommend the use of cannabis-based medicines as third-line drug therapies for chronic pain within a multicomponent approach. Conversely, the German medical association and a team of finish experts and officials do not recommend the prescription of medical cannabis due to the lack of high-quality evidence of efficacy and the potential harms. CONCLUSIONS: There are marked differences between the countries represented in EFIC in the approval and availability of cannabis-based products for medical use. EFIC countries are encouraged to collaborate with the European Medicines Agency to publish a common document on cannabis-based medicines. SIGNIFICANCE: There are striking differences between European countries in the availability of plant-derived and synthetic cannabinoids and of medical cannabis for pain management and for symptom control in palliative care and in the covering of costs by health insurance companies or state social security systems.


Assuntos
Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores de Canabinoides/uso terapêutico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Aprovação de Drogas/estatística & dados numéricos , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Espasticidade Muscular/tratamento farmacológico , Náusea/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico , Antieméticos/provisão & distribuição , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Canabidiol/provisão & distribuição , Canabidiol/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores de Canabinoides/provisão & distribuição , Dronabinol/análogos & derivados , Dronabinol/provisão & distribuição , Dronabinol/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Europa (Continente) , Alemanha , Humanos , Israel , Maconha Medicinal/provisão & distribuição , Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Espasticidade Muscular/etiologia , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Manejo da Dor , Cuidados Paliativos , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vômito/induzido quimicamente
3.
Am J Public Health ; 106(1): 21-7, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26562117

RESUMO

On January 1, 2014, Colorado became the first state in the nation to sell legal recreational marijuana for adult use. As a result, Colorado has had to carefully examine potential population health and safety impacts as well as the role of public health in response to legalization. We have discussed an emerging public health framework for legalized recreational marijuana. We have outlined this framework according to the core public health functions of assessment, policy development, and assurance. In addition, we have discussed challenges to implementing this framework that other states considering legalization may face.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Educação em Saúde/normas , Avaliação do Impacto na Saúde/métodos , Legislação de Medicamentos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto , Colorado , Comércio/legislação & jurisprudência , Dronabinol/efeitos adversos , Dronabinol/economia , Dronabinol/provisão & distribuição , Educação em Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação em Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Formulação de Políticas , Psicotrópicos/efeitos adversos , Psicotrópicos/economia , Psicotrópicos/provisão & distribuição
5.
Pediatrics ; 109(2): 284-9, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11826208

RESUMO

In 1984, I published in this journal a review entitled "Marijuana: A Crude Drug With a Spectrum of Underappreciated Toxicity." In the introduction to that article, I disclosed that our son Keith, who was 15 years old at the time, was in a long-term, modified outpatient adolescent drug and alcohol rehabilitation program because he had become dependent on marijuana with its associated behavioral, interpersonal, scholastic, and antisocial problems. Keith and most of his friends had experimented several times with LSD, beer, and several other drugs but never used injection drugs. Marijuana was clearly Keith's drug of choice and the only drug he used with regularity. Approximately 1 year later, Keith graduated from the treatment program. He completed the early aftercare component, relapsed several times, and completed a 4-month refresher drug rehabilitation program in another state. Nine years after admission to the first rehabilitation program, Keith finally attained some adult goals. Now 34 years old, he has been drug-free for 10 years. He is the president and owner of a successful discount cellular phone business that he started. More important, a decade ago, he reestablished an excellent and close relationship with his parents. As far as I can tell, Keith remains drug-free except for an occasional beer.


Assuntos
Cannabis/efeitos adversos , Abuso de Maconha/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Dronabinol/efeitos adversos , Dronabinol/farmacologia , Dronabinol/provisão & distribuição , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Internet/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Abuso de Maconha/reabilitação , Transtornos da Memória/induzido quimicamente , Memória de Curto Prazo/efeitos dos fármacos , Fitoterapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 21(S1): 122S-127S, 1981.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6271817

RESUMO

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is initiating a national THC distribution program by applying to the FDA for its classification as a Group C investigational agent. Since THC is also a Schedule I drug, the distribution system requires strict adherence to Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) security and safety regulations. Contrary to the usual distribution of Group C drugs, THC will not be available directly to physicians. THC will be made available to hospital pharmacies which are: (1) an NCI recognized Cancer Center (P-30 grant supported), (2) an NCI designated New Drug Study Group, (3) a member of the Council of Teaching Hospitals. Hospital pharmacies that are located in inadequately represented geographic areas when certain criteria are met by them will also be considered. Physicians desiring to prescribe THC need not have Schedule I registration, but should (1) have experience in cancer chemotherapy, (2) have a current DEA registration number, (3) agree to abide by the Guidelines for Use of THC, and (4) be registered with a participating pharmacy. A registered physician may prescribe THC by writing a Research Order for Medication on a usual prescription blank, including, in addition to normal required information, confirmation that patient consent has been obtained and the name of the hospital at which the physician is registered to prescribe THC.


Assuntos
Dronabinol/provisão & distribuição , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Dronabinol/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Honorários Farmacêuticos , Humanos , Sistemas de Medicação no Hospital , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...