Comparisons Between Endoscopic Band Ligation, Radiofrequency Ablation and Endoscopic Thermal Therapy for Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have emerged as alternative therapies of gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in addition to endoscopic thermal therapy (ETT), but the optimum choice remains inconclusive. AIM: We conducted a meta-analysis in order to compare these three treatments for GAVE. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials without any language restrictions and also performed a manual literature search of bibliographies located in both retrieved articles and published reviews for eligible publications prior to December 8, 2021. We included comparative trials which had evaluated the efficacy and safety of interventions in adults (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with symptomatic GAVE and was confirmed according to clinical backgrounds and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We included reports that compared three interventions, ETT, EBL, and RFA. The study was comprised of adults diagnosed with GAVE and focused on overall mortality, bleeding cessation, endoscopic improvement, complications, hospitalization, hemoglobin improvement, number of sessions and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: Twelve studies were performed involving a total of 571 participants for analysis. When compared with ETT, EBL achieved better bleeding cessation (OR 4.48, 95% CI 1.36-14.77, p = 0.01), higher hemoglobin improvement (MD 0.57, 95% CI 0.31-0.83, p < 0.01) and lower number of sessions (MD - 1.44, 95% CI - 2.54 to - 0.34, p = 0.01). Additionally, EBL was superior to ETT in endoscopic improvement (OR 6.00, 95% CI 2.26-15.97, p < 0.01), hospitalization (MD - 1.32, 95% CI - 1.91 to - 0.74, p < 0.01) and transfusion requirement (MD - 2.66, 95% CI - 4.67 to - 0.65, p = 0.01) with statistical significance, with the exception of mortality (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.19-1.77, p = 0.34) and complication rate (OR 5.33, 95% CI 0.58-48.84, p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: For GAVE, we suggest that EBL be initially recommended, and APC and RFA be used as alternative treatment choices based upon a very low quality of evidence.

Successful Surgical Management of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia in a Patient with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a rare clinical entity that presents with acute upper-gastrointestinal bleeding or chronic anemia. It is characterized by endoscopic watermelon appearance of the stomach. It is usually associated with other comorbidities; however, few articles have previously described GAVE in patients with end-stage renal disease. Its management is controversial, and endoscopic management is considered the treatment of choice. CASE REPORT A middle-age female patient, on regular hemodialysis for ESRD, was referred to the surgical out-patient clinic as a refractory GAVE after failure of endoscopic management as she became blood transfusion-dependent. She underwent laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with a Billroth II reconstruction of gastrojejunostomy. She had a smooth postoperative course and was followed up in the clinic for 12 months with no complications. Her hemoglobin level was stable at 9.4 g/dL without further blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS Gastric antral vascular ectasia is usually associated with other comorbidities; however, an association between GAVE and CKD is rare. Its management is controversial, and endoscopic management is considered the preferred method of treatment. Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy is an effective management modality for GAVE, with dramatic improvement and good outcomes in terms of bleeding, blood transfusion requirements, and nutritional status.

Bevacizumab in combination with octreotide rescues a patient with liver cirrhosis, GAVE syndrome and refractory hemorrhage - a case report.

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) syndrome is a rare but often challenging etiology of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).We report on a 60-year-old patient with liver cirrhosis, GAVE syndrome and recurrent and refractory GAVE-related UGIB. During a 5-month hospital stay, the patient required a total of 82 packed red blood cells (pRBCs) and 23 gastroscopies. All endoscopic approaches, including multiple argon plasma coagulation and band ligation sessions, remained unsuccessful. Antrectomy was waived because of the high perioperative mortality risk in Child-Pugh B liver cirrhosis. TIPS insertion also failed to control the bleeding. Only continuous intravenous octreotide infusion slowed the bleeding, but this forced the patient to be hospitalized. After 144 inpatient days, administration of subcutaneous octreotide allowed the patient to be discharged. However, the patient continued to require two pRBCs every 2-3 weeks. Based on recently published data, we treated the patient with bevacizumab (anti-VEGF antibody) off-label at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg body weight every three weeks in nine single doses over six months. Since the first administration, the patient has remained transfusion-free, has not required hospitalization, and leads an active life, working full-time. He remains on octreotide, which has been reduced but not yet discontinued. Additionally, no adverse events were observed.Thus, in patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory GAVE-related hemorrhage, bevacizumab combined with subcutaneous octreotide should be considered as an effective and durable pharmacological treatment option.

Hemostatic powder with argon plasma coagulation in the management of gastric antral vascular ectasia after failure of APC therapy alone

A 62-year-old woman with a medical history of cirrhosis due to advanced primary biliary cholangitis was referred for recurrent severe anemia. Upper GI endoscopy revealed a gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE). The hemoglobin levels were measured between 3 and 6 mg/dl for 10 years, and she received blood transfusion 2-3 times a year and continued endoscopic treatment. In particular, for 2 years from 2018, the decrease in hemoglobin level continued to be more severe, and endoscopic hemostasis using argon plasma coagulation (APC) was performed 11 times in total, but there was no significant clinical improvement. (AU)

Hemostatic powder with argon plasma coagulation in the management of gastric antral vascular ectasia after failure of APC therapy alone.

A 62-year-old woman with a medical history of cirrhosis due to advanced primary biliary cholangitis was referred for recurrent severe anemia. Upper GI endoscopy revealed a gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE). The hemoglobin levels were measured between 3 and 6 mg/dl for 10 years, and she received blood transfusion 2-3 times a year and continued endoscopic treatment. In particular, for 2 years from 2018, the decrease in hemoglobin level continued to be more severe, and endoscopic hemostasis using argon plasma coagulation (APC) was performed 11 times in total, but there was no significant clinical improvement.

Gastric antral vascular ectasia: when treatment prolongs bleeding.

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a common finding in endoscopic examinations of patients with liver cirrhosis. Although GAVE was first described in 1953 by Rider et al., its etiology as a cause of massive gastric bleeding is not fully understood. Herein, we discuss the theme of gastric hyperplastic polyps (HPs) after endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for GAVE.

Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is typically treated by endoscopic thermal therapies. Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has been reported in the treatment of GAVE with encouraging results. However, EBL is not widely used to this end. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases (inception to May 2021) to identify studies reporting on the use of EBL in the treatment of GAVE. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates; I2 values and 95% prediction intervals were calculated to assess the heterogeneity. RESULTS: Ten studies (194 patients) were included in the final analysis. The pooled rate of treatment responders with EBL in GAVE was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62.2-91.7), and GAVE recurrence was 15.4% (95% CI, 4.5-41.3). The pooled mean number of treatment sessions required was 2.4 (95% CI, 2.2-2.7), and the number of bands used to achieve eradication per patient was 15.1 (95% CI, 10.7-19.4). The pooled mean difference of pre- to post-treatment hemoglobin was 1.5 (95% CI, .9-2.2; P = .001), pre- to post-treatment units of packed red blood cells transfused was 1.1 (95% CI, .4-1.9; P = .002), and pre- to post-treatment hospital length of stay was .5 days (95% CI, .1-.9; P = .01). The pooled rate of overall adverse events was 15.9% (95% CI, 10.4-23.7). CONCLUSIONS: EBL demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes in the treatment of GAVE with minimal adverse events. Multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing EBL and other modalities as initial therapy are warranted.

Endoscopic band ligation compared to thermal therapy for gastric antral vascular ectasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gastric antral vascular ectasia is an infrequent cause of gastrointestinal-related blood loss manifesting as iron-deficiency anemia or overt gastrointestinal bleeding, and is associated with increased healthcare burdens. Endoscopic therapy of gastric antral vascular ectasia most commonly involves endoscopic thermal therapy. Endoscopic band ligation has been studied as an alternative therapy with promising results in gastric antral vascular ectasia. AIMS: The primary aim was to compare the efficacy of endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic thermal therapy by argon plasma coagulation for the management of bleeding gastric antral vascular ectasia in terms of the mean post-procedural transfusion requirements and the mean hemoglobin level change. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of the number of sessions needed for cessation of bleeding, the change in transfusion requirements, and the adverse events rate. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were reviewed. Randomized controlled clinical trials and retrospective studies comparing endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic thermal therapy in bleeding gastric antral vascular ectasia, with a follow-up period of at least 6 months, were included. Statistical analysis was done using Review Manager. RESULTS: Our search yielded 516 papers. After removing duplicates and studies not fitting the criteria of selection, five studies including 207 patients were selected for analysis. Over a follow-up period of at least 6 months, patients treated with endoscopic band ligation had significantly lower post-procedural transfusion requirements (MD -2.10; 95% confidence interval (-2.42 to -1.77)) and a significantly higher change in the mean hemoglobin with endoscopic band ligation versus endoscopic thermal therapy (MD 0.92; 95% confidence interval [0.39-1.45]). Endoscopic band ligation led to a fewer number of required sessions (MD -1.15; 95% confidence interval [-2.30 to -0.01]) and a more pronounced change in transfusion requirements (MD -3.26; 95% confidence interval [-4.84 to -1.68]). There was no difference in adverse events. CONCLUSION: Results should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited literature concerning the management of gastric antral vascular ectasia. Compared to endoscopic thermal therapy, endoscopic band ligation for the management of bleeding gastric antral vascular ectasia led to significantly lower transfusion requirements, showed a trend toward more remarkable post-procedural hemoglobin elevation, and a fewer number of procedures. Endoscopic band ligation may improve outcomes and lead to decreased healthcare burden and costs.

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe gastric antral vascular ectasia in patients with cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric antral vascular ectasia is a significant cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. AIM: To assess safety/efficacy and cost/advantages of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia in patients with cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis and severe gastric antral vascular ectasia who underwent radiofrequency ablation were enrolled. Clinical data, gastric antral vascular ectasia grade, and gastric antral vascular ectasia-related hospitalizations were collected. Primary outcome was defined as the absence of transfusion over the 6 months after radiofrequency. An economic analysis was performed in the same period. RESULTS: Forty patients (50% Child B) were enrolled (80% refractory to argon plasma coagulation). Gastric antral vascular ectasia eradication was obtained in all patients and 65% of these patients achieved primary outcome. After radiofrequency, mean number of red blood cells transfusions dropped (from 25 to 0.9, P < 0.0001), with a parallel increase in hemoglobin (from 8 to 10.5 g/dL, P < 0.0001). No major complication occurred and liver function remained stable in all patients. The cost-analysis demonstrated a profound reduction of health care cost (from € 536.084 to € 189.044 in the 6 months before vs. after radiofrequency, respectively). These results were confirmed in the subgroup analysis in patients refractory to argon plasma coagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation is safe and effective for the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia in patients with cirrhosis, including those refractory to argon plasma coagulation. Although the cost of single radiofrequency ablation is relatively high, the cost-analysis demonstrated considerable saving.

Gastric vascular abnormalities: diagnosis and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastric vascular abnormalities are a well known cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. Due to their recurrent bleeding tendency and potential to cause life-threatening blood loss, gastric vascular abnormalities can result in significant morbidity and cost. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been novel advances in medical and endoscopic management of gastric vascular lesions. New data suggest that endoscopic band ligation and ablation may be comparable, or even superior, to argon plasma coagulation (APC) for management of gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE). A creative, highly sensitive and specific computer-assisted tool has been developed to facilitate reading video capsule endoscopies for the detection of angiodysplasias, paving the way for artificial intelligence incorporation in vascular lesions diagnostics. Over-the-scope clipping is a relatively new technology that shows promising results in controlling bleeding from Dieulafoy's lesions. SUMMARY: In this article, we will broadly review the management of the most prevalent gastric vascular lesions, focusing on the most recent areas of research.

Ectasia vascular gástrica antral refractaria a tratamiento endoscópico / Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia Refractory to Endoscopic Treatment

No disponible

The cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treating patients with gastric antral vascular ectasia refractory to first line endoscopic therapy.

Objective: This economic evaluation aims to provide a preliminary assessment of the cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) compared with argon plasma coagulation (APC) when used to treat APC-refractory gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in symptomatic patients.Methods: A Markov model was constructed to undertake a cost-utility analysis for adults with persistent symptoms secondary to GAVE refractory to first line endoscopic therapy. The economic evaluation was conducted from a UK NHS and personal social services (PSS) perspective, with a 20-year time horizon, comparing RFA with APC. Patients transfer between health states defined by haemoglobin level. The clinical effectiveness data were sourced from expert opinion, resource use and costs were reflective of the UK NHS and benefits were quantified using Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) with utility weights taken from the literature. The primary output was the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per QALY gained.Results: Over a lifetime time horizon, the base case ICER was £4840 per QALY gained with an 82.2% chance that RFA was cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained. The model estimated that implementing RFA would result in reductions in the need for intravenous iron, endoscopic intervention and requirement for blood transfusions by 27.1%, 32.3% and 36.5% respectively. Compared to APC, RFA was associated with an estimated 36.7% fewer procedures.Conclusions: RFA treatment is likely to be cost-effective for patients with ongoing symptoms following failure of first line therapy with APC and could lead to substantive reductions in health care resource.

[A case of gastric antral vascular ectasia improved by splenorenal shunt embolization].

An 80-year-old man with chronic renal failure and a splenorenal shunt was admitted because of progressive anemia. Gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed bleeding from a gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE). Despite treatment with argon plasma coagulation and blood transfusions on multiple occasions, anemia caused by GAVE bleeding recurred frequently. The GAVE improved after splenorenal shunt embolization, and the patient did not require further blood transfusions for anemia. In this case, we inferred that some humoral factor (e.g., gastrin) in the portal blood caused the GAVE.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Argon Plasma Coagulation for Treatment of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the current standard endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as an attractive alternative. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of RFA and APC in the treatment of GAVE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases along with major gastroenterology annual meetings were performed through March 2017. Measured outcomes for comparative effectiveness and safety including improvement in hemoglobin levels, transfusion dependence, number of treatment sessions, complications, follow-up, and author-reported endoscopic success were compared among RFA and APC studies. RESULTS: In total, 24 studies (n=508) involving APC and 9 studies (n=104) on RFA were included. Mean age of patients included was comparable in both groups (65.33±7.80 y for APC vs. 66.96±6.23 y for RFA; P=0.98). Pooled mean follow-up was significantly longer for APC compared with RFA (19.52±13.11 vs. 7.43±3.72 mo; P<0.001). In total, 47% of RFA patients were refractory to previous treatment with APC. RFA required fewer mean treatment sessions compared with APC (2.10 vs. 3.39, respectively; P<0.001). RFA resulted in fewer and less severe complications as compared with APC (1.92% vs. 5.12%, respectively; P<0.001). Although the reported endoscopic success was better with RFA compared with APC (97% vs. 66%; P<0.001), the posttreatment pooled hemoglobin increase and reduction in transfusion dependence was higher for APC compared with RFA [weighted mean difference 3.10 g/dL (95% confidence interval, 2.92-3.28) vs. 1.95 g/dL (95% confidence interval, 1.62-2.26); P<0.001; and 88% vs. 66%; P<0.001, for APC and RFA, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited long-term data on RFA for GAVE; however, available evidence suggests RFA has a comparable efficacy and tolerability compared with APC. In addition, RFA seems to be effective for APC-refractory GAVE patients. Future controlled trials are needed to directly compare treatment efficacy, long-term durability, safety, and cost-effectiveness between these interventions.