A comparison of two prostaglandin analogues (enprostil vs misoprostol) in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer disease.

We conducted a clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety profile of two prostaglandin analogues, enprostil (35 micrograms twice daily) and misoprostol (200 micrograms four times daily) in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcers in 214 patients. The two agents healed approximately 80% and in excess of 90% of duodenal ulcers after 4 and 6 weeks' therapy, respectively. There was a significantly lower ulcer healing rate in both treatment groups in smokers compared with non-smokers (P < 0.05). However, daytime and nighttime ulcer pain relief was achieved in fewer than 50% of patients by either agent. Diarrhea, which occurred in more than 40% of patients, was the predominant side effect, and occurred mainly during the first 2 weeks of therapy with either agent. Nevertheless, this side effect was mild and self-limiting in the majority of patients. Both agents were found to be safe and well tolerated by the majority of patients. We conclude that these prostaglandin analogues are safe and effective duodenal ulcer healing agents. Furthermore, there was very little difference between enprostil and misoprostol. The limiting factors, however, for their routine use as ulcer healing agents are their low efficacy with regard to ulcer pain relief and the high incidence of diarrhea.

Effect of a synthetic prostaglandin E2 analogue, RS-86505-007, on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in patients with moderate hypercholesterolaemia: efficacy and tolerance of treatment and response in different apolipoprotein polymorphism groups.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled ascending dose trial was carried out to evaluate the hypocholesterolaemic efficacy and tolerance of RS-86505-007, a prostaglandin E2 analogue, in moderately hypercholesterolaemic patients. Twenty-four patients received an oral dose of RS-86505-007 3 micrograms t.i.d. and a separate group of 26 patients 6 micrograms t.i.d. for 6 weeks. Plasma total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations decreased after 2 weeks of treatment, and the reductions were dose dependent. After 6 weeks of treatment (6 micrograms t.i.d.), the reductions from baseline in total and LDL cholesterol concentration were 14.6% and 18.5%, respectively. No changes in the plasma concentration of triglycerides or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were observed. RS-86505-007 tended to reduce total and LDL cholesterol concentrations less in patients with the epsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E than in those with epsilon 3 allele. In contrast, the XbaI or EcoRI polymorphisms of the apolipoprotein B gene seemed to have no effect on the hypocholesterolaemic efficacy of the drug. The drug had no effect on the lipoprotein (a) concentration. Sixty-three percent of patients receiving 3 micrograms t.i.d. and 81% receiving 6 micrograms t.i.d. had adverse events, two-thirds of which related to the gastrointestinal tract. One patient in the 3-micrograms group and three patients in the 6-micrograms group terminated the study prematurely due to adverse effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Healing of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers with a synthetic prostaglandin analog (enprostil).

OBJECTIVE: Conventional ulcer therapy has not been proven effective in healing gastric ulcers caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) if the NSAIDs are continued. Our objective in this study was to determine whether a prostaglandin analog is an effective treatment for such NSAID-induced lesions. METHODS: To make this determination, we conducted a 9-wk double-blind trial comparing placebo with enprostil 35 micrograms twice daily and three times daily. Use of antacids was not allowed. Three centers entered 145 patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis, mean age 63 yr, who required continuous fixed-dose NSAID therapy within the range of therapeutic dosage. The minimum entrance criterion was the presence of either four gastric erosions or one gastric ulcer. Two pretreatment endoscopies within a 2-wk interval were performed to establish the presence of stable baseline gastric lesions. Endoscopy was repeated at wk 6 and 9 during treatment. All groups were similar with regard to age distribution, sex, weight, height, smoking usage, and alcohol consumption. RESULTS: The ulcer healing rates were 14%, 57%, and 68% at 6 wk and 19%, 68%, and 74% at 9 wk for the groups receiving placebo, enprostil twice daily, and enprostil three times daily, respectively (p < 0.01). Complete mucosal healing of all erosions and ulcers at 9 wk occurred in 59% of enprostil-treated patients and in 10% of placebo-treated patients. Additional gastric erosions and gastric ulcers developed in 16% of placebo patients and 4% of the enprostil patients. Eighteen percent of enprostil patients withdrew early from the study due to adverse experiences, such as diarrhea and abdominal pain. CONCLUSION: We concluded that during continued NSAID therapy 1) enprostil 35 micrograms (taken either twice daily or three times daily) heals NSAID-induced gastric ulcers and erosions and protects the mucosa from further NSAID-induced gastric injury; 2) gastric ulcers and erosions rarely heal spontaneously, and 3) enprostil results in a high incidence of diarrhea.

Effect of synthetic prostaglandin E2 analog enprostil on omeprazole-induced hypergastrinemia and hyperpepsinogenemia.

This study was undertaken to determine whether the synthetic prostaglandin E2 analog enprostil is able to inhibit basal and postprandial hypergastrinemia induced by omeprazole. We also studied the effect of omeprazole, enprostil, and the combination of both drugs on serum pepsinogen A and C levels. Eight normal subjects received in random order five-day courses of 40 mg omeprazole once a day, 35 micrograms enprostil three times a day, the combination of both drugs, and placebo. Omeprazole induced significant increases in basal and postprandial serum gastrin and in pepsinogen A and C levels. These increments persisted on the day after stopping treatment. Coadministration of enprostil inhibited omeprazole-induced basal hypergastrinemia and postprandial integrated serum gastrin, but not basal serum pepsinogen A and C, while the inhibition on the day after the treatment courses only reached statistical significance for the postprandial integrated serum gastrin concentration. It is concluded that enprostil inhibits omeprazole-induced basal and postprandial hypergastrinemia, with a tendency to protracted inhibition after stopping the drugs, and that enprostil does not significantly influence omeprazole-induced increases in pepsinogen A and C level. Coadministration of enprostil may be helpful in preventing pronounced hypergastrinemia in the few patients who show large serum gastrin increases during treatment with omeprazole.

Effect of enprostil on the gastroduodenal mucosa of healthy volunteers.

Enprostil is a synthetic dehydro-prostaglandin E2 with gastroduodenal ulcer-healing and mucosal-protective properties. One hundred and three healthy volunteers were randomized to receive capsules of enprostil 35 micrograms b.d. (the clinically recommended dose), enprostil 70 micrograms b.d., or placebo b.d. All underwent endoscopic assessment of the gastroduodenal mucosa, scored using a 0-4 scale, at baseline and on Days 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 of dosing. Mean and median maximum scores demonstrated a dose response, and the mean maximum scores were statistically significantly higher for both enprostil groups on each endoscopy day when compared with placebo. The majority of enprostil-treated subjects had petechial haemorrhages. The proportion of volunteers with small white-based mucosal breaks (erosions) was significantly higher for the fundus in the enprostil 70-microgram group on Days 21 and 28 when compared with placebo, but there were no significant differences between treatment groups for any area on the other study days. The 70-microgram dose was associated with significantly more gastrointestinal adverse events than the 35-microgram dose, which was similar to placebo. There were no significant differences between groups for large white-based mucosal breaks (ulcers). We conclude that oral enprostil produced gastric mucosal petechial haemorrhages, primarily in the fundus of the stomach. Gastric mucosal petechial haemorrhages are probably without clinical significance because they are very common in the general population (10-15%) and do not progress to erosions and ulcers.

A comparison between enprostil and ranitidine in the management of gastric ulceration.

In a randomly allocated, double-blind, endoscopically controlled study, 98 patients with gastric ulcers were treated with either (a synthetic prostaglandin of E2-like structure) enprostil 70 micrograms b.d. or 150 mg ranitidine b.d. The healing rates at 4, 8 and 12 weeks were enprostil 57, 91 and 94% and for ranitidine 55, 88 and 98%, respectively. Following ulcer healing, half the patients were followed for 1 year without treatment and the others were given 70 micrograms enprostil nocte. Endoscopy was repeated in both groups after 6 and 12 months or if dyspeptic symptoms returned. The recurrence rate without maintenance at 6 and 12 months, following ranitidine therapy, was 67 and 75%, and after enprostil therapy 50 and 61%, respectively. On maintenance enprostil, the recurrence rates were 28 and 40%. Forty-seven per cent of patients who completed maintenance treatment had a proven ulcer recurrence within 6 months of stopping therapy. Diarrhoea was a common side-effect of enprostil therapy. Seven patients were withdrawn because of diarrhoea or abdominal pain.