Applicability of the Barcelona scale to assess the quality of cleanliness of mucosa at esophagogastroduodenoscopy / Aplicabilidad de la escala Barcelona para valorar la calidad de la limpieza de la mucosa en la esofagogastroduodenoscopia

Background and objectives There are few scales with prospective validation for the assessment of the upper gastrointestinal mucosal cleanliness during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reproducible cleanliness scale for use during an EGD. Methods We developed a cleanliness scale (Barcelona scale) with a score (0–2 points) of five segments of the upper gastrointestinal tract with thorough cleaning techniques (esophagus, fundus, body, antrum, and duodenum). First, 125 photos (25 of each area) were assessed, and a score was assigned to each image by consensus among 7 experts endoscopists. Subsequently, 100 of the 125 images were selected and the inter- and intra-observer variability of 15 previously trained endoscopists was evaluated using the same images at two different times. Results In total, 1500 assessments were performed. In 1336/1500 observations (89%) there was agreement with the consensus score, with a mean kappa value of 0.83 (0.45–0.96). In the second evaluation, in 1330/1500 observations (89%) there was agreement with the consensus score, with a mean kappa value of 0.82 (0.45–0.93). The intra-observer variability was 0.89 (0.76–0.99). Conclusions The Barcelona cleanliness scale is a valid measure and reproducible with minimal training. Its application in clinical practice is a significant step to standardize the quality of the EGD. (AU)

Introducción Existen pocas escalas validadas prospectivamente para evaluar la limpieza de la mucosa esofagogastroduodenal durante la endoscopia digestiva alta (EDA). El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar una escala válida y reproducible para su uso en la realización de una EDA. Métodos Desarrollamos una escala de limpieza (escala Barcelona) en la que se aplicó una puntuación de 0 a 2 a cinco áreas del tracto digestivo superior (esófago, fundus, cuerpo, antro y duodeno) después de haber realizado todas las maniobras de lavado necesarias. Inicialmente, se evaluaron 125 fotos (25 de cada área) y se asignó una puntuación (de 0 a 2) a cada una por consenso entre siete endoscopistas. Posteriormente, se seleccionaron 100 de las 125 fotografías y se evaluó la variabilidad inter e intraobservador de 15 endoscopistas previamente formados utilizando las mismas imágenes en dos momentos diferentes. Resultados Se efectuaron un total de 1.500 observaciones. En 1.336/1.500 de ellas (89%) hubo coincidencia con la puntuación del consenso, siendo el valor medio de kappa de 0,83 (0,45-0,96). En la segunda evaluación, en 1.330/1.500 observaciones (89%) hubo coincidencia con la puntuación del consenso, siendo el valor medio de kappa de 0,82 (mínimo 0,45 y máximo 0,93). La variabilidad intraobservador fue de 0,89 (0,76-0,99). Conclusiones La escala de limpieza Barcelona es una medida válida y reproducible con un mínimo entrenamiento. Su uso en la práctica clínica podría ser un paso significativo para estandarizar la calidad de la EDA. (AU)

Impact of COVID-19 on gastric cancer treatment in Japanese high-volume centers: a JCOG stomach cancer study group survey.

PURPOSES: The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected socioeconomic and healthcare systems in many countries. Accordingly, many individuals may have canceled their annual health-check programs, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which would have resulted in lower numbers of newly diagnosed patients with gastric cancer in comparison to other times. METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to 62 hospitals every week from May 2020 to August 2020 (total 744) through mailing lists of the Stomach Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. The number of patients with gastric cancer and hospital systems during the COVID-19 pandemic were surveyed. RESULTS: In total, 74% (551 out of 744) of the questionnaires were answered and analyzed. In early May, approximately 50% of hospitals had to restrict surgical slots due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, they gradually loosened the restrictions thereafter. The number of gastrectomies was < 80% that of the same period in the previous year, and hospitals in Tokyo were seriously affected by a 50% decrease in the number of gastrectomies. CONCLUSIONS: The number of gastrectomies was lower than that in the previous year. Further multi-center follow-up studies are required to evaluate the long-term effects of COVID-19 on the clinical outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.

Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2021.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastrointestinal diseases account for considerable health care use and expenditures. We estimated the annual burden, costs, and research funding associated with gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States. METHODS: We generated estimates using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; Nationwide Emergency Department Sample; National Inpatient Sample; Kids' Inpatient Database; Nationwide Readmissions Database; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program; National Vital Statistics System; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research; MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data; MarketScan Medicare Supplemental data; United Network for Organ Sharing registry; Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; and National Institutes of Health (NIH). RESULTS: Gastrointestinal health care expenditures totaled $119.6 billion in 2018. Annually, there were more than 36.8 million ambulatory visits for gastrointestinal symptoms and 43.4 million ambulatory visits with a primary gastrointestinal diagnosis. Hospitalizations for a principal gastrointestinal diagnosis accounted for more than 3.8 million admissions, with 403,699 readmissions. A total of 22.2 million gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed, and 284,844 new gastrointestinal cancers were diagnosed. Gastrointestinal diseases and cancers caused 255,407 deaths. The NIH supported $3.1 billion (7.5% of the NIH budget) for gastrointestinal research in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal diseases are responsible for millions of health care encounters and hundreds of thousands of deaths that annually costs billions of dollars in the United States. To reduce the high burden of gastrointestinal diseases, focused clinical and public health efforts, supported by additional research funding, are warranted.

Severe Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Caused by Reflux Esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports about reflux esophagitis (RE) as a cause of severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). AIMS: This study aims to evaluate (1) changes in its prevalence over the last three decades and (2) clinical and endoscopic characteristics and 30-day outcomes among RE patients with and without focal esophageal ulcers (EUs) and stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH). METHODS: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data of esophagitis patients hospitalized with severe UGIB between 1992 and 2020. Descriptive analysis and statistical comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Of 114 RE patients, the mean age was 61.1 years and 76.3% were males. 38.6% had prior gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms; overall 36% were on acid suppressants. Over three consecutive decades, the prevalence of RE as a cause of severe UGIB increased significantly from 3.8 to 16.7%. 30-day rebleeding and all-cause mortality rates were 11.4% and 6.1%. RE patients with focal EUs and SRH (n = 23) had worse esophagitis than those with diffuse RE (n = 91) (p = 0.012). There were no differences in 30-day outcomes between RE patients with and without EUs and SRH. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with severe UGIB caused by RE, (1) the prevalence has increased significantly over the past three decades, (2) the reasons for this increase and preventive strategies warrant further study, (3) most patients lacked GERD symptoms and did not take acid suppressants, and (4) those with focal ulcers and SRH had more severe esophagitis and were treated endoscopically.

Prevalence of neoplasia in solitary and multiple esophago-gastrointestinal polyps: 5 years retrospective histopathological study.

The increasing use of endoscopy has led to more discernable abnormalities in the stomach, including polyps. Gastric polyps encompass a spectrum of pathologic conditions that can vary in histology, neoplastic potential, and management. Despite their high prevalence, there is a paucity of literature to support management and treatment decisions for endoscopists. The goal of this review is to summarize clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic features of various polyps, review syndromes associated with such polyps and provide management recommendations. The present study was carried out for analyzing and comparing the prevalence of neoplasia in polyps (Solitary and multiple) removed endoscopically from the esophagus, stomach, and bowel undergoing screening. Five years retrospective study was done on patients who underwent endoscopy procedures including Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) and colonoscopy between June 2015 and March 2019 in Faruk Medical City Hospital, Sulaimani City. Age and sex of patients, site of occurrence, number of polyps (solitary or multiple), and polyps' histologic type of 369 cases were analyzed in this study. Regarding solitary polyps, out of 279 polyps, 155 were neoplastic (55%) and 124 were non-neoplastic polyps, while multiple polyps, out of a total of 90 cases, 68 were neoplastic (75%) and 22 were non-neoplastic. More than 78% of patients were above the age of 40 years. Tubular adenoma was the most commonly diagnosed polyp. Large bowel was the most commonly involved site and left-sided polyps outnumbered right-sided ones with the sigmoid colon being the most commonly involved site. Screening programs including endoscopy, especially the colon for detecting polyps and particularly the colorectal region can be helpful to reduce morbidity and mortality of patients.

Clinical Presentation of Celiac Disease and Diagnosis Accuracy in a Single-Center European Pediatric Cohort over 10 Years.

(1) Background: Changes in the clinical presentation of celiac disease (CD) in children have been reported. The guidelines of the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) allow esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsies to be avoided under specific circumstances. We aimed to assess the clinical picture of pediatric CD patients at diagnosis and to validate ESPGHAN non-biopsy criteria. (2) Methods: Patients with suspected CD or undergoing screening from 2004 to 2014 at the University Hospital in Modena, Italy were enrolled. The accuracy of ESPGHAN non-biopsy criteria and modified versions were assessed. (3) Results: In total, 410 patients were enrolled, of whom 403 were considered for analysis. Of the patients considered, 45 were asymptomatic and diagnosed with CD (11.2%) while 358 patients (88.2%) were symptomatic, of whom 295 were diagnosed with CD. Among symptomatic CD patients, 57 (19.3%) had gastrointestinal symptoms, 98 (33%) had atypical symptoms and 140 (47.4%) had both. No difference was found for the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms at different ages. The non-biopsy ESPGHAN criteria yielded an accuracy of 59.4% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%; 173 out of 308 EGD (56.2%) could have been avoided. The modified 7× and 5× upper limit of normal cut-offs for IgA anti tissue-transglutaminase reached 60.7% and 64.3% of EGD avoided, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Over 10 years, late age at diagnosis and increased rates of atypical CD presentation were found. ESPGHAN non-biopsy criteria are accurate for CD diagnosis and allow half of unneeded EGD to be avoided. Modified versions allowed sparing a greater number of EGD.

Clinical outcomes of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in critically ill patients using high-dose proton pump inhibitor for suspected bleeding: A retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a useful procedure performed for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. No definite clinical guidelines recommend EGD implementation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with suspected GI bleeding. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of EGD in critically ill patients who are using high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for suspected GI bleeding.We retrospectively analyzed ICU patients using high-dose PPI for suspected GI bleeding from January 2012 to September 2020. Major cases of GI bleeding, such as those with hematemesis and hematochezia, were excluded, and 1:1 propensity score matching was performed. The change in hemoglobin level, requirement of red blood cell transfusion, re-suspected bleeding event, length of ICU stay, and ICU mortality were compared between the EGD and non-EGD groups.Of the 174 subjects included, 52 patients underwent EGD within 24 hours of PPI administration. In the EGD group, 22 (42.3%) patients showed normal findings, while esophagitis and gastritis were most common abnormal finding (n = 11, 21.2%), and 14 patients (26.9%) underwent a hemostatic procedure. While comparing the 2 groups, the EGD group required a higher amount of red blood cell transfusion (packs) than the non-EGD group for a week (3.04 ±â€Š0.44 vs 2.07 ±â€Š0.25, P = .01). There was no significant difference in the change in hemoglobin level after 1 week (P = .15). After propensity score matching, the EGD group showed similar the requirement of red blood cell transfusion and change in hemoglobin level for a week (P = .52, P = .97, respectively). In analyses for all patients and propensity score matched patients, there was no statistically significant difference in term of re-suspected bleeding event rate, duration of ICU stay, and ICU mortality. However, re-suspected bleeding event rate and ICU mortality were lower trend in the EGD group than the non-EGD group.This study showed that EGD had no definite clinical benefit in ICU patients using high-dose PPI for suspected GI bleeding and aggressive EGD is not necessarily recommended. However, it is necessary to consider EGD in patients who are tolerant.

Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used diagnostic method with no widely accepted quality measure. We assessed quality indicator-composite detection rate (CDR)-consisting of detection of at least one of the following: cervical inlet patch, gastric polyp and post-ulcer duodenal bulb deformation. The aim of the study was to validate CDR according to detection rate of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms (UGN). METHODS: It was a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted from January 2019 to October 2019. The endoscopic reports from 2896 symptomatic patients who underwent diagnostic EGD were analyzed. The EGDs were performed in three endoscopy units located in tertiary university hospital, private outpatient clinic and local hospital. RESULTS: 64 UGNs were detected. The mean CDR was 21.9%. The CDR correlated with UGN detection rate (R = 0.49, p = 0.045). Based on CDR quartiles, operators were divided into group 1 with CDR < 10%, group 2 with CDR 10-17%, group 3 with CDR 17.1-26%, and group 4 with CDR > 26%. Detection rate of UGN was significantly higher in the group 4 in comparison to group 1 (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.2 - 9.0). In the multivariate regression model, patient age, male gender and operator's CDR > 26% were independent risk factors of UGN detection (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 - 1.05, OR 2; 95% CI 1.2 - 3.5, and OR 5.7 95% CI 1.5 - 22.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The CDR is associated with the detection of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms. This parameter may be a useful quality measure of EGD to be applied in general setting.

El impacto de la oesofagogastroduodenoscopia de rutina en el plan de manejo antes de la colecistectomia: un estudio prospectivo / The Impact of Routine Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy on the Management Plan before Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Study

Introducción: La colecistectomía laparoscópica se ha convertido rápidamente en el procedimiento de elección de rutina para la enfermedad de la vesícula biliar, y actualmente es el procedimiento abdominal mayor que se realiza con mayor frecuencia en los países occidentales; la mayoría de los autores sugieren que es seguro observar a pacientes con cálculos biliares asintomáticos, y que la colecistectomía solo se realiza por aquellos pacientes que desarrollan síntomas. El quince por ciento de los pacientes persiste teniendo síntomas posteriores a la colecistectomía. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar el uso de la esofagogastroduodenoscopía previa a la colecistectomía laparoscópica y su impacto en el manejo. Método: Este fue un estudio clínico prospectivo que involucró a pacientes con cálculos biliares ingresados en el Hospital Docente de Al-Basra, Departamento de Cirugía General desde enero de 2016 hasta diciembre de 2019. Todos los pacientes fueron seguidos desde el momento del ingreso hasta seis meses después. Estos pacientes se dividieron en siete grupos según la edad. A todos los pacientes se les realizó una ecografía abdominal para diagnosticar la presencia de colelitiasis y descartar otros problemas abdominales. Todos los pacientes programados para colecistectomía laparoscópica se sometieron a una endoscopia del tracto gastrointestinal superior antes de la operación. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 1200 pacientes con rango de edad de 21 a 82 años (mujeres, 83,33%, hombres, 16,66%) con colelitiasis. La proporción de mujeres a hombres fue de 5:1. Se observaron hallazgos endoscópicos positivos en 380 (31,6%) pacientes. En estos pacientes se modificó el plan de manejo con hallazgos positivos por endoscopia y se pospuso su cirugía hasta recibir el tratamiento adecuado. Conclusión: El uso rutinario de esofagogastroduodenoscopia previa a la colecistectomía disminuiría la colecistectomía innecesaria en pacientes con colelitiasis y hallazgos endoscópicos positivos, lo que disminuye la persistencia de síntomas post colecistectomía.

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly become the procedure of choice for routine gallbladder disease, and it is currently the most performed major abdominal procedure in Western countries, most authors suggest that it's safe to observe patients with asymptomatic gallstones, with cholecystectomy only being performed for those patients who develop symptoms. Fifteen percent of patients persist to have post cholecystectomy symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the use of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and its impact on the management. Method: This was a prospective clinical study involving patients with gallstone admitted to the Al-Basra Teaching Hospital, Department of General Surgery from January 2016 to December 2019. All patients were followed up from the time of admission until six months later. These patients were divided into seven groups according to age. All patients were having an abdominal ultrasound examination in order to diagnose the presence of cholelithiasis and to exclude other abdominal problems. All patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy underwent upper GIT endoscopy preoperatively. Results: A total of 1200 patient age range from 21 to 82 years were included (women, 83.33%, men, 16.66%) had cholelithiasis. Female to male ratio was 5:1. Positive endoscopic findings were observed in 380(31.6 %) patients. The management plan was changed in these patients with positive findings by endoscopy and their surgery was postponed until they received proper treatment. Conclusion: The routine use of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy prior to cholecystectomy would decrease the unneeded cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis and positive endoscopic findings, which decrease post cholecystectomy persistence of symptoms.

High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients scheduled for digestive endoscopy after the peak of the first wave of the pandemic. / Alta prevalencia de infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes programados para endoscopia digestiva después del pico de la primera onda pandémica.

Healthcare professionals in endoscopy units have a possible risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection by different routes: inhalation of airborne droplets, aerosols, conjunctival contact and faecal-oral transmission. OBJECTIVE: To describe the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a series of patients scheduled for digestive endoscopy at the Hospital Santa Caterina. Salt. (Girona). METHODS: Descriptive study of a series of cases of patients scheduled for endoscopy during the month of May 2020, when endoscopic activity was resumed after the peak of the pandemic, following SCD, SEED, AEG and ESGE recommendations. We examined nasopharyngeal samples 48-72 hours before the appointment, by RT-PCR, in all patients. RNA extraction was performed using the kits: Qiagen®-adapted, BiosSprint®96-DNA-Blood-Kit (384). For amplification-detection of SARS-CoV-2, methods recommended by the WHO and the CDC were followed. RESULTS: 110 asymptomatic patients without close contact with a positive case in the previous 14 days were scheduled; 105 (96.4%) were negative and five (4.5%) were positive. Two patients developed respiratory symptoms after diagnosis (presymptomatic) and three remained asymptomatic. Allfive5 patients were autochthonous cases with no history of travel or residence in another city or country associated with high prevalence of infection. Four cases were women aged 60-81 years. The N gene was detected in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in patients scheduled for digestive endoscopy. Given the risk of transmission to professionals, we consider it advisable to perform SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 48-72 hours before the examination in situations of high incidence in the population.

Predicting endoscopic activity recovery in England after COVID-19: a national analysis.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a substantial reduction in gastrointestinal endoscopies, creating a backlog of procedures. We aimed to quantify this backlog nationally for England and assess how various interventions might mitigate the backlog. METHODS: We did a national analysis of data for colonoscopies, flexible sigmoidoscopies, and gastroscopies from National Health Service (NHS) trusts in NHS England's Monthly Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity dataset. Trusts were excluded if monthly data were incomplete. To estimate the potential backlog, we used linear logistic regression to project the cumulative deficit between actual procedures performed and expected procedures, based on historical pre-pandemic trends. We then made further estimations of the change to the backlog under three scenarios: recovery to a set level of capacity, ranging from 90% to 130%; further disruption to activity (eg, second pandemic wave); or introduction of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) triaging. FINDINGS: We included data from Jan 1, 2018, to Oct 31, 2020, from 125 NHS trusts. 10 476 endoscopy procedures were done in April, 2020, representing 9·5% of those done in April, 2019 (n=110 584), before recovering to 105 716 by October, 2020 (84·5% of those done in October, 2019 [n=125 072]). Recovering to 100% capacity on the current trajectory would lead to a projected backlog of 162 735 (95% CI 143 775-181 695) colonoscopies, 119 025 (107 398-130 651) flexible sigmoidoscopies, and 194 087 (172 564-215 611) gastroscopies in January, 2021, attributable to the pandemic. Increasing capacity to 130% would still take up to June, 2022, to eliminate the backlog. A further 2-month interruption would add an extra 15·4%, a 4-month interruption would add an extra 43·8%, and a 6-month interruption would add an extra 82·5% to the potential backlog. FIT triaging of cases that are found to have greater than 10 µg haemoglobin per g would reduce colonoscopy referrals to around 75% of usual levels, with the backlog cleared in early 2022. INTERPRETATION: Our work highlights the impact of the pandemic on endoscopy services nationally. Even with mitigation measures, it could take much longer than a year to eliminate the pandemic-related backlog. Urgent action is required by key stakeholders (ie, individual NHS trusts, Clinical Commissioning Groups, British Society of Gastroenterology, and NHS England) to tackle the backlog and prevent delays to patient management. FUNDING: Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) at University College London, National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, and DATA-CAN, Health Data Research UK.

Factors associated with risk of COVID-19 contagion for endoscopy healthcare workers: A survey from the Italian society of digestive endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The present study was aimed to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated factors among HCWs in endoscopy centers in Italy. METHODS: All members of the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED) were invited to participate to a questionnaire-based survey during the first months of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. RESULTS: 314/1306 (24%) SIED members accounting for 201/502 (40%) endoscopic centers completed the survey. Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) were available in most centers, but filtering face-piece masks (FFP2 or FFP3) and negative pressure room were not in 10.9 and 75.1%. Training courses on PPE use were provided in 57.2% of centers only; there was at least one positive HCW in 17.4% of centers globally, 107/3308 (3.2%) HCWs were diagnosed with COVID-19 with similar rates of physicians (2.9%), nurses (3.5%) and other health operators (3.5%). Involvement in a COVID-19 care team (OR: 4.96) and the lack of training courses for PPE, (OR: 2.65) were associated with increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of COVID-19 among endoscopy HCWs was not negligible and was associated with work in a COVID-19 care team and lack of education on proper PPE use. These data deserve attention during the subsequent waves.

The Elderly with Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency are More Susceptible to Cardiovascular Disease.

AIM: Recent studies suggest that glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, a genetically inherited condition causing hemolytic anemia, may be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to perform a retrospective case-control study in Sardinia taking advantage from clinical records of patients undergoing upper digestive endoscopy and screened for H. pylori infection. METHODS: A total of 9,604 patients with a known G6PD status and a complete clinical history, encompassing CVD, and leading CVD risk factors, including H. pylori infection, undergoing upper endoscopy between 2002 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed an increased CVD risk in subjects with G6PD deficiency [odd ratio (OR), 3.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44-4.30] after adjusting for potential confounders and effect modifiers, including H. pylori infection. Cardiovascular risk was similar in subjects with and without G6PD deficiency before age 60 (OR, 1.26; 95% CI 0.78-2.04, P=0.562), whereas it increased after age 60 in the former group (OR, 3.05; 95% CI 2.22-4.19, P＜0.0001) especially in males (OR 3.67; 95% CI 2.19-6.14) compared with females (OR, 2.96; 95% CI 1.89-4.64) by sex-specific logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: The risk of CVD was greater in G6PD-deficient subjects after age 60, both in males and females, than those with normal enzyme activity, after adjusting for conventional CVD risk factors and H. pylori infection. The reduction of important protective mechanisms against oxidative stress in the elderly might explain the study findings.

Urban-Rural Disparities and Temporal Trends in Peptic Ulcer Disease Epidemiology, Treatment, and Outcomes in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) has been decreasing over time with Helicobacter pylori eradication and use of acid-suppressing therapies. However, PUD remains a common cause of hospitalization in the United States. We aimed to evaluate contemporary national trends in the incidence, treatment patterns, and outcomes for PUD-related hospitalizations and compare care delivery by hospital rurality. METHODS: Data from the National Inpatient Sample were used to estimate weighted annual rates of PUD-related hospitalizations. Temporal trends were evaluated by joinpoint regression and expressed as annual percent change with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We determined the proportion of hospitalizations requiring endoscopic and surgical interventions, stratified by clinical presentation and rurality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: There was a 25.8% reduction (P < 0.001) in PUD-related hospitalizations from 2005 to 2014, although the rate of decline decreased from -7.2% per year (95% CI: 13.2% to -0.7%) before 2008 to -2.1% per year (95% CI: 3.0% to -1.1%) after 2008. In-hospital mortality was 2.4% (95% CI: 2.4%-2.5%). Upper endoscopy (84.3% vs 78.4%, P < 0.001) and endoscopic hemostasis (26.1% vs 16.8%, P < 0.001) were more likely to be performed in urban hospitals, whereas surgery was performed less frequently (9.7% vs 10.5%, P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, patients managed in urban hospitals were at higher risk for postoperative morbidity (odds ratio 1.16 [95% CI: 1.04-1.29]), but not death (odds ratio 1.11 [95% CI: 1.00-1.23]). DISCUSSION: The rate of decline in hospitalization rates for PUD has stabilized over time, although there remains significant heterogeneity in treatment patterns by hospital rurality.

Incidence of Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Worsens Outcomes with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Result of a National Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a feared complication of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and has been shown to increase morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to assess the incidence of non-variceal UGIB in patients with ACS in a national cohort and its impact on in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost of hospitalization. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing the 2016 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) utilizing ICD 10 CM codes. Principal discharge diagnoses of ACS (STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA) in patients over 18 years old were included. Non-variceal UGIB with interventions including endoscopy, angiography, and embolization were also evaluated. Primary outcome was the national incidence of concomitant non-variceal UGIB in the setting of ACS. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost of stay. RESULTS: A total of 661,404 discharges with principal discharge diagnosis of ACS in 2016 were analyzed. Of the included cohort, 0.80% (n = 5324) were complicated with non-variceal UGIB with increased frequency in older patients (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.03-1.04; p = 0.0001). Despite endoscopic evaluation, 17.35% (n = 744) underwent angiography. After adjustment of confounders, inpatient mortality was significantly higher in patients with UGIB (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.63-2.63, p = 0.0001). Non-variceal UGIB also led to significantly longer LOS (10.38 days vs 4.37 days, p = 0.0001) and cost of stay ($177,324 vs $88,468, p = 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Our study shows that the national incidence of non-variceal UGIB complicating ACS is low at less than 1%, but resulted in significantly higher inpatient mortality, LOS, and hospitalization charges.

Racial disparity in healthcare utilization among patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: results from a multicenter cohort.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparity in healthcare is defined as differences in healthcare services received by racial groups not due to difference in needs or preferences. As irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is highly correlated with social factors, healthcare disparities are important factors in the sociocultural model of IBS. We used healthcare utilization as a lens to examine potential racial disparities in IBS. METHODS: We retrospectively matched 3823 IBS minority patients who self-identified as "Hispanic," "Black," or "Asian" to white IBS controls and examined the number of patients with gastroenterology consults, gastroenterology procedures, and IBS-related Primary Care visits within each cohort from 2003 to 2017. KEY RESULTS: Minority IBS patients were less likely to receive a gastroenterology consult than white IBS controls. Both Black and Asian IBS patients were more likely to have an IBS-related Primary Care visit than white IBS controls. All 3 minority IBS cohorts received significantly more gastroenterology procedures compared to white IBS controls. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Minority IBS patients are more likely to receive gastroenterology procedures than white IBS patients. Further studies are needed to determine whether increased procedure likelihood in minority IBS patients represents a communication gap between minority patients and their providers or patient preference.

Effect of successive endoscopic procedures in polyp and adenoma detection rates: Too early is not always too good.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of hypothetical cumulative fatigue after performing too many endoscopic procedures on both polyp and adenoma detection rates (PDR, and ADR, respectively). The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of successive endoscopic procedures on PDR and ADR. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was undertaken among consecutive patients on whom colonoscopy and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy were performed between January 2012 and August 2014. Data regarding polyp and adenoma detection, cecal intubation, and bowel cleansing quality as well as demographical data of subjects were extracted. Endoscopic procedures were classified according to the time slots of the procedures throughout the endoscopy session in three groups: from the 1st to 4th endoscopy study (round 1), from the 5th to the 8th study (round 2), above the 9th study (round 3). We compared PDR and ADR among rounds. RESULTS: Overall, 3388 patients were enrolled. Median age was 50 years (range 18-95) and 52.39% were female. There was a significant difference in terms of PDR among rounds (36.83%, 41.24%, and 43.38%, respectively, p = 0.007) and a non-significant numerical difference when ADR was compared (23.2%, 25.71%, and 26.78%, p = 0.07). On multivariate analysis, ADR was significantly associated with age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02 [1.01-1.03]), and male sex (OR 1.64 [1.38-1.94]). CONCLUSION: Theoretical endoscopist's fatigue due to cumulative performance of endoscopies does not diminish colonoscopy quality. Both PDR and ADR seem to improve after endoscopist's cumulative rounds of performed endoscopies. This could be due to a "warm-up" effect.

The 100 top cited articles in the field of digestive endoscopy: from 1950 to 2017

BACKGROUND: the present study aimed to describe the characteristics of articles that had the most citations in the field of digestive endoscopy. METHOD: articles included were obtained from the Web of Science database, which were selected and ranked according to the number of citations. The characteristics of the 100 most cited articles were then analyzed. RESULTS: the number of citations of the top 100 of 303,063 eligible papers ranged from 370 to 2,866. The most cited paper was a study of colorectal cancer prevention using colonoscopic polypectomy. The most common topics discussed by the top 100 papers included colonoscopy (n = 33) and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (n = 23), with most of the papers focusing on diagnosis (n = 24) and treatment (n = 15). CONCLUSION: by identifying the most influential publications, the present study could serve as a guide toward further development in the area of digestive endoscopy

No disponible

Recovery of endoscopy services in the era of COVID-19: recommendations from an international Delphi consensus.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on provision of endoscopy services globally as staff and real estate were repurposed. As we begin to recover from the pandemic, a cohesive international approach is needed, and guidance on how to resume endoscopy services safely to avoid unintended harm from diagnostic delays. The aim of these guidelines is to provide consensus recommendations that clinicians can use to facilitate the swift and safe resumption of endoscopy services. An evidence-based literature review was carried out on the various strategies used globally to manage endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic and control infection. A modified Delphi process involving international endoscopy experts was used to agree on the consensus statements. A threshold of 80% agreement was used to establish consensus for each statement. 27 of 30 statements achieved consensus after two rounds of voting by 34 experts. The statements were categorised as pre-endoscopy, during endoscopy and postendoscopy addressing relevant areas of practice, such as screening, personal protective equipment, appropriate environments for endoscopy and infection control precautions, particularly in areas of high disease prevalence. Recommendations for testing of patients and for healthcare workers, appropriate locations of donning and doffing areas and social distancing measures before endoscopy are unique and not dealt with by any other guidelines. This international consensus using a modified Delphi method to produce a series of best practice recommendations to aid the safe resumption of endoscopy services globally in the era of COVID-19.