RESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is recommended that patients with progressive neurological disease (PND) receive general and specialized palliative care. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of neuropalliative care on quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction with provided care in both patients with PND in advanced stages of disease and their family caregivers. METHODS: The sample consisted of 151 patients with PND and 140 family caregivers. The PNDQoL questionnaire was used for data collection. Patients and family caregivers completed the questionnaires both before and 3 months after the intervention. RESULTS: Before intervention, there were no statistically significant differences in the individual domains of QoL in patients and family caregivers in either the intervention or the control group. After intervention, differences were identified in the sample of patients in the domains of symptoms burden (p < 0.001), emotional (p < 0 .001), social functioning (p = 0.046), spiritual area (nonreligious) (p = 0.050), and in QoL. In the sample of family caregivers, there were differences in the domains of symptoms burden (p < 0.001), emotional functioning (p = 0.016), spiritual area (nonreligious) (p = 0.042), and in the assessment of health (p = 0.002), and QoL (p = 0.002). Patients and family caregivers from the intervention group evaluated their satisfaction with the quality of care provided significantly more positively in all five analyzed domains. CONCLUSION: The provision of neuropalliative care to patients with advanced stages of PND helped to maintain and slightly improve their QoL, and symptoms burden, and resulted in a more positive assessment of satisfaction with the quality of care provided.
Assuntos
Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/enfermagem , Enfermagem em Neurociência/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Satisfação do Paciente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cuidadores/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/complicações , Enfermagem em Neurociência/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The outcome focus for survivors of critical care has shifted from mortality to patient-centered outcomes. Multidimensional outcome assessments performed in critically ill patients typically exclude those with primary neurological injuries. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of measurements of physical function, cognition, and quality of life in patients requiring neurocritical care. METHODS: This evaluation of a quality improvement initiative involved all patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center. INTERVENTIONS: Telephone assessments of physical function (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended and modified Rankin Scale scores), cognition (modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status), and quality of life (5-level EQ-5D) were conducted between 3 and 6 months after admission. RESULTS: During the 2-week pilot phase, the authors contacted and completed data entry for all patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit over a 2-week period in approximately 11 hours. During the 18-month implementation phase, the authors followed 1324 patients at a mean (SD) time of 4.4 (0.8) months after admission. Mortality at follow-up was 38.9%; 74.8% of these patients underwent withdrawal of care. The overall loss to follow-up rate was 23.6%. Among all patients contacted, 94% were available by the second attempt to interview them by telephone. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining multidimensional outcome assessments by telephone across a diverse population of neurocritically ill patients was feasible and efficient. The sample was similar to those in other cohort studies in the neurocritical care population, and the loss to follow-up rate was comparable with that of the general critical care population.
Assuntos
Enfermagem de Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estado Terminal/psicologia , Estado Terminal/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfermagem em Neurociência/estatística & dados numéricos , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Ohio , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Thai trauma nurses play a vital role in neuroprotective nursing care of patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Nurses' knowledge of the evidence underpinning initial neuroprotective nursing care vital to safe and high-quality patient care. However, the current state of knowledge of Thai trauma nurses is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated Thai nurses' knowledge of neuroprotective nursing care of patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Data were collected by a survey, comprising a section on participant characteristics and series of multiple-choice questions. All registered nurses (n = 22) and nursing assistants (n = 13) from the trauma ward of a regional Thai hospital were invited to participate: the response rate was 100%. Participants had limited knowledge of carbon dioxide monitoring; causes and implications of hypercapnia; mean arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure targets; management of sedatives and analgesics; and management of hyperthermia. Improving their knowledge focusing on knowledge deficits through educational training and implementation of evidence-based practice is essential to improve the safety and quality of care for Thai patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Enfermagem em Neurociência/normas , Enfermagem em Ortopedia e Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfermagem em Neurociência/métodos , Enfermagem em Neurociência/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Habilidades para Realização de Testes/normas , Habilidades para Realização de Testes/estatística & dados numéricos , Tailândia , Enfermagem em Ortopedia e Traumatologia/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nurse staffing ratios impact both the quality and safety of care on a particular unit. Most hospitals have access to a large volume of nurse-sensitive outcomes. We hypothesized that these data could be used to explore the impact of changing the nurse-to-patient ratio on patient-reported outcomes, nurse satisfaction scores, and quality of care metrics. METHODS: Retrospective data from hospital resources (eg, Press Ganey reports) were linked to daily staffing records (eg, assignment sheets) in a pre-post study. Before September 2017, the nurse-to-patient ratio was 1:1.75 (pre); afterward, the ratio was reduced to 1:1.5 (post). RESULTS: Press Ganey National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators scores were improved, staffing turnover rates were reduced, and falls were linked to periods of high nurse-to-patient ratios. CONCLUSION: This study shows the efficacy of using readily available metrics to explore for associations between nurse staffing and nurse-sensitive outcomes at the nursing care unit level. This provides a unique perspective to optimize staffing ratios based on personalized (unit-level) metrics.
Assuntos
Benchmarking , Enfermagem em Neurociência/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Benchmarking/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/normas , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Segurança do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
AIM: Study aimed to analyse how rehabilitation staff spends working time on specific activities in a neurorehabilitation hospital and to determine the number of direct activities received by patients with different levels of disease severity. BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated how clinical staff spends their time on activities in rehabilitation hospitals without considering at the same time all working categories and without reporting the number of direct activities received by patients with respect to their disease severity. DESIGN: Self-reported observational study. METHOD: Work Sampling Technique was used to record direct, indirect, unit-related and personal activities every 5 min for 2 days. RESULTS: Total of 6,974 activities were recorded over 581 working hours. Physiotherapists and nurses spent 75.2% and 54.8% of their time in direct activities and medical doctors only 25.4%. Total time of direct activities was significantly different among worker categories (p = 0.001) and depended on patients' disease severity (p = 0.020) in a different manner among worker categories (interaction: p = 0.010). This time ranged from almost 4 hr up to 6½ hr for the most severely affected patients. CONCLUSION: Type of work differed among professionals. Workload greatly depended on degree of patients' disability. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurses and therapists spent most of their time in direct activities with patients. Economic burden of neurorehabilitation may vary greatly depending on disease severity.
Assuntos
Enfermagem em Neurociência/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidade do Paciente , Centros de Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Itália , Reabilitação Neurológica/métodos , Reabilitação Neurológica/normas , Enfermagem em Neurociência/métodos , Centros de Reabilitação/organização & administração , Autorrelato , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Carga de Trabalho/normasRESUMO
PURPOSE: To explore satisfaction and burnout of nurses working in neurology wards in Shanghai, China. DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional questionnaire survey. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-seven nurses from 23 neurology wards in 21 tertiary general hospitals were recruited using cluster sampling. The valid response rate was 94.83%. FINDINGS: Nurse satisfaction with the salary/wages, the job and the nurse staffing level were 21.79%, 37.33%, and 40.87%. A high nurse burnout rate was found as: emotional exhaustion (EE) ≥ 27 (89.92%); depersonalization (DP) ≥ 10 (92.64%); and reduced personal accomplishment (PA)≤ 33 (79.29%). CONCLUSIONS: Most nurses in the neurology wards were dissatisfied and had high levels of burnout. Experienced, intermediate and senior nurses were at the highest risk for job turnover. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nurse administrators should take effective measures to increase nurse satisfaction and decrease burnout to retain experienced nurses and keep the stability of nursing workforce.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Satisfação no Emprego , Enfermagem em Neurociência/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação Pessoal , Enfermagem em Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , China , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This comparative study of two adult neuro critical care units examined the impact of patient- and family-centered design on nurse-family interactions in a unit designed to increase family involvement. BACKGROUND: A growing evidence base suggests that the built environment can facilitate the delivery of patient- and family-centered care (PFCC). However, few studies examine how the PFCC model impacts the delivery of care, specifically the role of design in nurse-family interactions in the adult intensive care unit (ICU) from the perspective of the bedside nurse. METHODS: Two neuro ICUs with the same patient population and staff, but with different layouts, were compared. Structured observations were conducted to assess changes in the frequency, location, and content of interactions between the two units. Discussions with staff provided additional insights into nurse attitudes, perceptions, and experiences caring for families. RESULTS: Nurses reported challenges balancing the needs of many stakeholders in a complex clinical environment, regardless of unit layout. However, differences in communication patterns between the clinician- and family-centered units were observed. More interactions were observed in nurse workstations in the PFCC unit, with most initiated by family. While the new unit was seen as more conducive to the delivery of PFCC, some nurses reported a loss of workspace control. CONCLUSIONS: Patient- and family-centered design created new spatial and temporal opportunities for nurse-family interactions in the adult ICU, thus supporting PFCC goals. However, greater exposure to unplanned family encounters may increase nurse stress without adequate spatial and organizational support.