Epidermólisis bullosa en España: Estudio observacional de una cohorte de pacientes atendidos en un centro de referencia nacional / Epidermolysis Bullosa in Spain: Observational Study of a Cohort of Patients Treated in a National Referral Center

Antecedentes y objetivo La epidermólisis bullosa (EB) es un grupo heterogéneo de trastornos hereditarios caracterizado por un aumento de la fragilidad mucocutánea. El objetivo del presente estudio es describir las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de los pacientes con EB atendidos en el Hospital Universitario La Paz, centro de referencia nacional para EB hereditaria. Material y método Estudio observacional, retrospectivo y unicéntrico. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con diagnóstico clínico y molecular de EB atendidos en el Servicio de Dermatología del Hospital Universitario La Paz desde el 1 de enero de 2000 hasta el 28 de febrero de 2021. Resultados Se registraron 214 pacientes, con una edad mediana de 17 años (RIQ: 8-32); el 54,2% fueron mujeres. Las formas clínicas correspondieron a EB distrófica con 135 (63,1%) casos, EB simple con 67 (31,3%) casos, EB juntural con ocho (3,7%), EB Kindler con tres (1,4%) casos y EB adquirida con un (0,5%) caso. El 35,5% de los pacientes procedían de Madrid. Las complicaciones clínicas más frecuentes en nuestra serie fueron el prurito (63,1%), las infecciones locales (56,5%) y el dolor (54,7%). Las complicaciones más graves fueron las cardíacas (5,6%) y la aparición de CCE (10,3%). Fallecieron 22 pacientes (10,3%). Conclusiones La forma clínica predominante fue la EBDR. Las complicaciones más prevalentes fueron el prurito, el dolor y las infecciones, y las más graves, la miocardiopatía y el CCE. Es un estudio pionero realizado en nuestro país que permitirá implementar estrategias para mejorar la situación sociosanitaria de los pacientes con EB (AU)

Background and objective Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heterogeneous group of inherited disorders characterized by a high degree of mucocutaneous fragility. This study aimed to describe the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of patients with EB treated in Hospital Universitario La Paz, a national referral center for inherited EB. Material and methods Observational, retrospective, single-center study. We included all cases with a clinical and molecular diagnosis of EB managed in the hospital's dermatology department from January 2, 2000, to February 28, 2021. Results A total of 214 cases were studied. The median (interquartile range) age was 17 (8–32) years; 54.2% were women. One hundred thirty-five (63.1%) patients had dystrophic EB, 67 (31.3%) had EB simplex, 8 (3.7%) had junctional EB, and 3 (1.4%) had Kindler syndrome. One (0.5%) had EB acquisita. Over a third (35.5%) of the patients resided in Madrid. The most common clinical complications were pruritus (63.1%), local infections (56.5%), and pain (54.7%). The most serious ones were cardiomyopathy (in 5.6%) and squamous cell carcinoma (10.3%). Twenty-two patients (10.3%) died. Conclusions Dystrophic EB was the most prevalent clinical form. The most prevalent complications were pruritus, pain, and infections. The most serious ones were cardiomyopathy and squamous cell carcinoma. This study is the first in Spain that explores strategies for improving the health status and quality of life of patients with EB (AU)

Identification and Computational Analysis of Novel Pathogenic Variants in Pakistani Families with Diverse Epidermolysis Bullosa Phenotypes.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) includes a group of rare gesnodermatoses that result in blistering and erosions of the skin and mucous membranes. Genetically, pathogenic variants in around 20 genes are known to alter the structural and functional integrity of intraepidermal adhesion and dermo-epidermal anchorage, leading to four different types of EB. Here we report the underlying genetic causes of EB phenotypes segregating in seven large consanguineous families, recruited from different regions of Pakistan. Whole exome sequencing, followed by segregation analysis of candidate variants through Sanger sequencing, identified eight pathogenic variants, including three novel (ITGB4: c.1285G>T, and c.3373G>A; PLEC: c.1828A>G) and five previously reported variants (COL7A1: c.6209G>A, and c.1573C>T; FERMT1: c.676insC; LAMA3: c.151insG; LAMB3: c.1705C>T). All identified variants were either absent or had very low frequencies in the control databases. Our in-silico analyses and 3-dimensional (3D) molecular modeling support the deleterious impact of these variants on the encoded proteins. Intriguingly, we report the first case of a recessively inherited form of rare EBS-Ogna associated with a homozygous variant in the PLEC gene. Our study highlights the clinical and genetic diversity of EB in the Pakistani population and expands the mutation spectrum of EB; it could also be useful for prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of the affected families.

WebPalestra: epidermólise bolhosa

Conceito Epidermólise Bolhosa (EB). Definindo os 4 tipos e cuidados iniciais com o recém nascido. Orientações básicas quanto aos curativos adequados e cadastro Debra Brais.

WebPalestra: epidermólise bolhosa: o que há de novo, atualizações e pesquisas

Pesquisas em desenvolvimento e mais atuais sobre Epidermolise Bolhosa, com destaque para o transplante de medula óssea, diagnóstico genético e terapias gênicas.

Next-generation sequencing through multigene panel testing for the diagnosis of hereditary epidermolysis bullosa in Chinese population.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heritable blistering disorder. We performed a next-generation sequencing-based multigene panel test and successfully predicted 100% of the EB types, including, 36 EB simplex (EBS), 13 junctional EB (JEB), 86 dystrophic EB (DEB), and 3 Kindler EB. Chinese JEB and recessive DEB (RDEB) patients have relatively mild phenotypes; for severe type separately accounts for 45.5% and 23.8%, respectively. We identified 96 novel and 49 recurrent pathogenic variants in 11 genes, although we failed to detect the second mutation in one JEB and five RDEB patients. We identified one novel p.E475K mosaic mutation in the clinically normal mother of one out of 13 EBS patients with KRT5 mutations, one recurrent p.G2034R mosaic mutation, and one novel p.G2043R mosaic mutation in the clinically normal relatives of two out of 19 dominant DEB patients. This study shows that next-generation technology could be an effective tool in diagnosing EB.

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa: New diagnostics and new clinical phenotypes.

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of heterogeneous genetic disorders characterized by skin fragility. EB comprises a large spectrum of phenotypes, ranging from severe cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement caused by lack of key adhesion proteins, to mild cutaneous fragility caused by subtle molecular defects. Disease-causing variants in 20 different genes account for the genetic and allelic heterogeneity of EB. Here, we discuss the development of laboratory methods that enabled these discoveries and the clinical and molecular features of some new EB entities elucidated during the past 5-6 years.

Mutations in PLOD3, encoding lysyl hydroxylase 3, cause a complex connective tissue disorder including recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa-like blistering phenotype with abnormal anchoring fibrils and type VII collagen deficiency.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB), the paradigm of heritable skin fragility disorders, is associated with mutations in as many as 20 distinct genes. One of the clinical variants, recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB), demonstrates sub-lamina densa blistering accompanied by alterations in anchoring fibrils due to mutations in COL7A1. In this study, we characterized a patient with widespread connective tissue abnormalities, including skin blistering similar to that in RDEB. Whole exome sequencing, combined with genome-wide homozygosity mapping, identified a homozygous missense mutation in PLOD3 encoding lysyl hydroxylase 3 (LH3). No mutations in COL7A1, the gene previously associated with RDEB, were detected. The level of LH3 was dramatically reduced in the skin and fibroblast cultures from the patient. The blistering in the skin occurred below the lamina densa and was associated with variable density and morphology of anchoring fibrils. The level of type VII collagen expression in the skin was markedly reduced. Analysis of hydroxylysine and its glycosylated derivatives (galactosyl-hydroxylysine and glucosyl-galactosyl-hydroxylysine) revealed marked reduction in glycosylated hydroxylysine. Collectively, these findings indicate that PLOD3 mutations can result in a dystrophic EB-like phenotype in the spectrum of connective tissue disorders and add it to the list of candidate genes associated with skin fragility.

Diagnóstico genético de la epidermólisis bullosa: recomendaciones de un grupo español de expertos / Genetic diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa: recommendations from an expert Spanish research group

La epidermólisis bullosa (EB), enfermedad genética de fragilidad mucocutánea rara y devastadora, es clínica y genéticamente heterogénea. Se caracteriza por la aparición de ampollas inducidas por contacto/fricción o de forma espontánea. La EB se clasifica en 4 tipos: simple, juntural, distrófica y síndrome de Kindler y en 30 subtipos. Esta genodermatosis está causada por defectos en proteínas implicadas en la adhesión dermoepidérmica, con al menos 19 genes caracterizados hasta el momento y más de 1.000 mutaciones identificadas, que explican la complejidad de su diagnóstico. El diagnóstico molecular de la EB es el último paso de un proceso laborioso que se inicia con la recogida de una historia clínica detallada y la toma de una biopsia cutánea, que incluya una zona de despegamiento entre la dermis y la epidermis inducida, en el momento de la recolección. Dicho despegamiento permite establecer el plano de rotura por mapeo antigénico y, en el mejor de los casos, un único gen candidato en el que realizar la búsqueda de las mutaciones patogénicas. Finalizado el diagnóstico molecular, se está en condiciones de ofrecer al paciente un asesoramiento genético adecuado (patrón de herencia, riesgo de recurrencia y opciones de diagnóstico prenatal y preimplantacional) y los consecuentes programas preventivos, así como un pronóstico clínico razonable que facilite su acceso a opciones terapéuticas y de rehabilitación específicas. Por último, el diagnóstico molecular es imprescindible para la participación de los pacientes en ensayos clínicos, de gran importancia en una enfermedad como la EB, que no tiene cura. El objetivo de la presente guía es difundir el procedimiento de diagnóstico de la EB tal y como se está llevando a cabo en nuestro laboratorio y, así, evitar diagnósticos clínicos subóptimos o incompletos. Las recomendaciones recogidas son fruto de nuestra experiencia de más de 10 años de diagnóstico molecular de EB en España

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic disease that causes mucocutaneous fragility. It comprises a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorder characterized by spontaneous or contact/friction-induced blistering. EB is classified into 4 types-simplex, junctional, dystrophic, and Kindler syndrome-and 30 subtypes. The disease is caused by defects in proteins implicated in dermal-epidermal adhesion. At least 19 genes have been characterized and more than 1000 mutations identified, thus rendering diagnosis complex. Molecular diagnosis of EB is the last stage of a laborious process that starts with a detailed clinical history compilation and careful procurement of a skin fresh biopsy that includes an area where the epidermis detaches from the dermis. The detachment area makes it possible to establish the cleavage plane by antigen mapping and, in the best scenario, to identify a single candidate gene to search for pathogenic mutations. The results of the molecular diagnosis enable the physician to provide appropriate genetic counseling (inheritance pattern, risk of recurrence, and options for prenatal and preimplantation diagnosis) and implement subsequent preventive programs, as well as to establish a reasonable clinical prognosis facilitating access to specific therapy and rehabilitation. Lastly, molecular diagnosis is essential for the participation of patients in clinical trials, a critical issue given the current incurable status of EB. The present guidelines aim to disseminate the procedure for diagnosing EB in our laboratory and thus avoid suboptimal or incomplete clinical diagnoses. The recommendations we provide are the result of more than 10 years’ experience in the molecular diagnosis of EB in Spain

The Position of Targeted Next-generation Sequencing in Epidermolysis Bullosa Diagnosis.

The precise classification of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) into 4 main types and more than 30 subtypes is based on the level of skin cleavage, as well as clinical and molecular features, and is crucial for early prognostication, case management, genetic counselling and prenatal or pre-implantation diagnosis. We report here the molecular pathology of 40 consecutive cases of suspected EB, which were investigated by immunofluorescence mapping (IFM) and/or by a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) multi-gene panel. IFM correctly established the EB subtype in 76% of cases, while the molecular pathology was completely elucidated in 90% of cases by the targeted NGS multi-gene panel. Thirteen previously unreported mutations in EB genes were identified. In cases with unclear clinical and IFM findings, mutations were found by NGS in previously unexpected genes. IFM was useful in delivering fast results in newborns, and in indicating the consequences of the variants of uncertain significance on protein level. This study underscores the efficacy of the strategy of combining targeted NGS with IFM in resolving unusual EB phenotypes. It also suggests that, despite technological advances, careful clinical evaluation and deep phenotyping remains a crucial factor that dictates successful diagnosis of EB.

[Epidermolysis bullosa].

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genodermatosis. A new classification system is presented, distinguishing the subtypes of EB, and this system is based on the phenotype, mode of inheritance, ultrastructure, immunofluorescence findings, and specific mutation(s) present. EB is inherited in an autosomal dominant or -recessive fashion. Clinical manifestations vary in severity and character according to subtype. The severity ranges from mild localized to life-threatening. Available treatment is mainly symptomatic with therapeutic treatment in an experimental stage.

Miocardiopatía en pacientes con epidermólisis ampollosa hereditaria / Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Hereditary Bullous Epidermolysis

Introducción y objetivos: En las últimas décadas se ha descrito la asociación entre epidermólisis ampollosa (EA) y miocardiopatía dilatada (MD). Generalmente esta última enfermedad se detecta en fases avanzadas, implicando un peor pronóstico. Nuestro objetivo consistió en determinar la prevalencia de MD en los pacientes con EA vistos en el Hospital San Joan de Déu (Barcelona) desde mayo de 1986 a abril de 2015. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal mediante revisión de las historias clínicas con atención al tipo y subtipos mayores de EA y la existencia o no de MD. Resultados: Se recogieron 57 pacientes con diagnóstico de EA. De ellos 19 presentaban EA simple, 10 EA juntural, 27 EA distrófica (14 EA distrófica dominante y 13 EA distrófica recesiva) y existió un caso de síndrome de Kindler. Solo 2 de los pacientes con EA distrófica recesiva presentaron MD. En 23 de los pacientes con EA existieron factores que podrían tener una relación causal con el potencial desarrollo de MD. Conclusión: La MD puede ser una complicación en los pacientes con EA, mayoritariamente del subtipo de EA distrófica recesiva, por lo que deben hacerse controles periódicos para su temprano diagnóstico y tratamiento (AU)

Introduction and objective: In recent decades, an association has been reported between epidermolysis bullosa (EB) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DC). DC is typically in an advanced phase when detected, leading to a poorer prognosis. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of DC in patients with EB seen in Hospital San Joan de Déu in Barcelona, Spain, between May 1986 and April 2015. Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional chart-review study in which we recorded the type and main subtypes of EB and the presence or absence of DC. Results: Fifty-seven patients with EB were found, 19 with EB simplex, 10 with junctional EB, 27 with dystrophic EB (14 dominant dystrophic and 13 recessive dystrophic), and just 1 with Kindler syndrome. DC was detected in only 2 patients with recessive dystrophic EB. Twenty-three patients had presented factors that could have had a causal relationship with the potential onset of DC. Conclusion: DC is a possible complication of EB, particularly in recessive dystrophic EB. Periodic follow-up should be performed to make an early diagnosis and start treatment (AU)

Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Hereditary Bullous Epidermolysis. / Miocardiopatía en pacientes con epidermólisis ampollosa hereditaria.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In recent decades, an association has been reported between epidermolysis bullosa (EB) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DC). DC is typically in an advanced phase when detected, leading to a poorer prognosis. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of DC in patients with EB seen in Hospital San Joan de Déu in Barcelona, Spain, between May 1986 and April 2015. METHODS: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional chart-review study in which we recorded the type and main subtypes of EB and the presence or absence of DC. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with EB were found, 19 with EB simplex, 10 with junctional EB, 27 with dystrophic EB (14 dominant dystrophic and 13 recessive dystrophic), and just 1 with Kindler syndrome. DC was detected in only 2 patients with recessive dystrophic EB. Twenty-three patients had presented factors that could have had a causal relationship with the potential onset of DC. CONCLUSION: DC is a possible complication of EB, particularly in recessive dystrophic EB. Periodic follow-up should be performed to make an early diagnosis and start treatment.

[Hereditary epidermolysis bullosa: French national guidelines (PNDS) for diagnosis and treatment]. / Épidermolyses bulleuses héréditaires : protocole national de diagnostic et de soins (PNDS).

Hereditary epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heterogeneous group of rare genetic diseases characterized by fragile skin and/or mucous membrane, and it may be either local or generalized. It is caused by mutations in genes encoding different proteins involved mainly in the structure and function of the dermal-epidermal junction. Nineteen genes have so far been identified. They are classified by level of skin cleavage (from top to bottom) into four groups: EB simplex, junctional EB, dystrophic EB and Kindler syndrome. Clinically suspected diagnosis is confirmed by immunohistochemical examination of a skin biopsy at specialized centres in order to determine the level of cleavage and the deficient protein. This first step may be followed by genetic analysis. The severity of the disease is highly variable, ranging from localized forms with little effect on quality of life to rapidly lethal forms. In generalized severe forms, the extent and chronicity of lesions, as well as mucosal involvement, can lead to systemic complications: malnutrition, pain, joint contractures, chronic inflammation, amyloidosis, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Some specific forms are associated with other cutaneous signs (nail involvement, alopecia, hyperpigmentation, palmoplantar keratoderma) or extracutaneous involvement (muscular dystrophy or pyloric atresia). No curative treatment of EB is available today. EB requires multidisciplinary medical care, nursing, psychological and social management. This is best provided by a specialized network, involving reference centres, centres of expertise and daily caregivers. The goal of treatment is the prevention and treatment of lesions with specific non-adherent dressings and the prevention, detection and treatment of complications. It is essential not to traumatize the skin (bandaging, friction, etc.). Protein, gene or cell replacement therapy, and allogeneic bone marrow, cord blood or pluripotent stem-cell transplantation are currently being assessed. The aim of these French recommendations (national diagnostic and treatment protocol [PNDS]) is to provide healthcare professionals with guidance on the course of EB and on optimal patient management.

The Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI): grading disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change in epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND: The lack of validated outcome measures for epidermolysis bullosa (EB) presents major barriers to evaluating disease severity and comparing the efficacy of therapies. The Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) was recently introduced as a valid and reliable instrument for EB; however, its interpretation for use in clinical practice and clinical trials is yet to be defined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the interpretability of the EBDASI in classifying patients according to disease severity and clinical response. METHODS: A total of 53 outpatients with EB at two interstate institutions were prospectively evaluated. At each visit, the principal dermatologist completed the EBDASI and global assessments of disease severity and change. Classifications for mild, moderate and severe disease using the EBDASI were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Minimal clinically important differences for the EBDASI activity subscale were calculated and compared with the standard error of measurement. RESULTS: Total EBDASI score ranges of 0-42, 43-106 and 107-506 corresponded to mild, moderate and severe disease respectively. Reduction in EBDASI activity scores of greater than 9 indicated clinically significant improvement. An increase of 3 in the activity score indicated deterioration. CONCLUSION: The EBDASI is a responsive tool and may be useful in characterizing disease severity and response. The cut-offs proposed in this study provide the first practical guide for interpreting the EBDASI, further supporting its use for longitudinal patient assessment and in clinical trials.

Molecular pathology of the basement membrane zone in heritable blistering diseases:: The paradigm of epidermolysis bullosa.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB), a phenotypically heterogeneous group of skin fragility disorders, is characterized by blistering and erosions with considerable morbidity and mortality. Mutations in as many as 18 distinct genes expressed at the cutaneous basement membrane zone have been shown to be associated with the blistering phenotype, attesting to the role of the corresponding proteins in providing stable association of the epidermis to the dermis through adhesion at the dermo-epidermal basement membrane zone. Thus, different forms of EB have been highly instructive in providing information on the physiological functions of these proteins as integral components of the supramolecular adhesion complexes. In addition, precise information of the underlying genes and distinct mutations in families with EB has been helpful in subclassification of the disease with prognostic implications, as well as for prenatal testing and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Furthermore, knowledge of the types of mutations is a prerequisite for application of allele-specific treatment approaches that have been recently developed, including read-through of premature termination codon mutations and chaperone-facilitated intracellular transport of conformationally altered proteins to proper physiologic subcellular location. Collectively, EB serves as a paradigm of heritable skin diseases in which significant progress has been made in identifying the underlying genetic bases and associated aberrant pathways leading from mutations to the phenotype, thus allowing application of precision medicine for this, currently intractable group of diseases.

Epidemiology of Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa Based on Incidence and Prevalence Estimates From the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry.

Importance: Accurate estimation of the incidence and prevalence of each subtype of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is essential before clinical trials can be designed and sufficient funding allocated by government agencies and third-party insurers for the care of these individuals. Objective: To determine the incidence and prevalence of inherited EB stratified by subtype in the United States during a 16-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Data were obtained from 3271 patients consecutively enrolled in the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry from January 1, 1986, through December 31, 2002, using a detailed instrument created with the assistance of the National Institutes of Health. Analyses were performed in January 1999 and April 2015. Participants were patients of all ages with EB. Main Outcomes and Measures: Extensive clinical and laboratory data were collected on patients who were subclassified and serially revalidated based on published diagnostic recommendations by an international panel of experts. Pertinent to this report, estimates were made of the incidence and prevalence during 2 time frames. Results: During the first 5 years of funding of the registry, the overall incidence and prevalence of inherited EB were 19.60 and 8.22 per 1 million live births, respectively. When reassessed over the entire 16 years of the study, the prevalence rose to 11.07, whereas the overall incidence remained unchanged at 19.57 cases. Changes were also observed within some disease subsets as increased numbers of patients were identified, recruited, followed up longitudinally, and resubclassified as needed over time. For example, in 2002, the prevalence of EBS overall and localized EBS had increased considerably by 30.4% and 25.5%, respectively, whereas the prevalence of generalized intermediate EBS declined by 76.7% as a result of later subclassification of some of those patients into other subtypes. In contrast, no significant change was noted in the overall prevalence of JEB or generalized severe JEB, although there was a 73.0% decline in the prevalence of generalized intermediate JEB. Conclusions and Relevance: Precise estimates of the incidence and prevalence of each major subtype of inherited EB in the United States are now available that should assist investigators in choosing which subtypes are amenable to properly designed, large-scale, clinical trials.

Newborn with severe epidermolysis bullosa: to treat or not to treat?

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is an inherited skin disease with four main subtypes that cannot be distinguished clinically at birth. All subtypes may present with widespread life-threatening blisters and fragile skin, making treatment and handling of the newborn with EB challenging. The prognosis of EB depends on the subtype, and therefore maximum treatment is necessary until the final diagnosis is known. In this case, it took 2 weeks before a final diagnosis was reached. In the meantime, we had several ethical discussions on the treatment level. The most important issues were management of pain and nutrition. For immediate pain relief, intranasal fentanyl worked best and gabapentin was successfully used for chronic pain. The feeding difficulties were handled first by a nasogastric feeding tube. Later a normal feeding bottle proved to be adequate.

The Frequency of Signs of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Children with Epidermolysis Bullosa.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in children with epidermolysis bullosa (EB). DESIGN: Hospital-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred five children with different forms of EB. METHODS: Prospective ophthalmic examination of children with EB presenting over seventeen months including meibomian gland assessment using a recognized classification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of MGD. RESULTS: One hundred five children were recruited, 8.6% with junctional EB, 34.3% with simplex EB, 34.3% with autosomal recessive dystrophic EB, and 22.9% autosomal dominant dystrophic EB. Mean age was 7.42 years (range, 0.08-17.75 years). Ninety-two children (87.62%) demonstrated 1 or more features of MGD. CONCLUSIONS: Most children with EB exhibit signs of MGD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective ocular surface evaluation in children with EB to include lid margin evaluation using a recognized classification system. Our findings help explain some of the ocular surface anomalies seen in children with EB.

[Current approaches to the morphologic diagnosis of different types of congenital epidermolysis bullosa]. / Sovremennye podkhody k morfologicheskoi diagnostike razlichnykh tipov vrozhdennogo bulleznogo epidermoliza.

Congenital epidermolysis bullosa (CEB) is an extensive group of hereditary skin diseases, the differential diagnosis of which is a challenge due to the rarity of this pathology and the diversity of its clinical manifestations. The determination of the type of CEB makes it possible to estimate its prognosis and to facilitate a prenatal diagnosis. AIM: to optimize the morphological diagnosis of different types of CEB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 28 skin biopsies from 14 patients with different types of CEB were investigated. The investigators performed routine histological examination of skin fragments taken from a bullous area and immunofluorescence antigen mapping using the indirect immunofluorescence test (IIFT) with antibodies against structural proteins of the dermal-epidermal junction (laminin α3, ß3, and γ2 chains, keratins 5 and 14, types VII and XVII collagen, α6 and ß4 integrin subunits, desmoplakin, plectin, kindlin-1, and plakophillin) of the apparently unaffected skin. The intact skin of healthy individuals, which had been obtained during cosmetic operations, was used as controls in IIFT. RESULTS: Immunofluorescence antigen mapping could determine the type of CEB in all cases and in 86% of cases identify the protein, the impaired production of which was responsible for the development of the disease. CONCLUSION: Immunofluorescence antigen mapping is an integral part of the comprehensive morphological diagnosis of CEB, acting as an intermediate between the morphological verification of CEB diagnosis and the targeted search for mutations by a molecular genetic method.