RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Patient injury claims data and insurance records provide detailed information on patient injuries. This study aimed to identify the errors and adverse events that led to patient injuries in vascular surgery for the treatments of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and iliac artery aneurysms (IAA) in Finland. The study also assessed the severity and preventability of the injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Finnish Patient Insurance Centre's insurance charts of compensated patient injuries in the treatment of AAA and IAA. Records of all compensated patient injury claims involving AAA and IAA between 2004 and 2017 inclusive were reviewed. Contributing factors to injury were identified and classified. The injuries were assessed for their preventability by using the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist correctly. The degree of harm was graded by Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Twenty-six patient injury incidents were identified in the treatment of 23 patients. Typical injuries involved delays in diagnosis or treatment, errors in surgical technique or injuries to adjacent anatomic organs. Three (13.0%) patients died due to patient injury. Two deaths were caused by delays in diagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) and the third death was due to missed diagnosis of post-operative myocardial infarction. Retained foreign material caused injuries to two (8.7%) patients. One (4.3%) patient had a severe postoperative infection. Three (13.0%) patients experienced an injury to an adjacent organ. One patient had a bilateral and another a unilateral above-the-knee amputation due to patient injury. Three injuries were considered preventable. Most harms were grade IIIb Clavien-Dindo classification in which injured patients required a surgical intervention under general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Compensated patient injuries involving the treatment of AAA and IAA are rare, but are often serious. Injuries were identified during all stages of care. Most injuries involved open surgical procedures.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirurgia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico , Ruptura Aórtica/mortalidade , Diagnóstico Tardio , Feminino , Finlândia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidade , Seguro Saúde , Complicações Intraoperatórias/economia , Masculino , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is most often referred to vascular surgeons. However, there is a lack of understanding of the malpractice cases involving TOS. The goal of this study is to better understand the medicolegal landscape related to the care of TOS. METHODS: The Westlaw Edge AI-powered proprietary system was retrospectively reviewed for malpractice cases involving TOS. A Boolean search strategy was used to identify target cases under the case category of "Jury Verdicts & Settlements" for all state and federal jurisdictions from 1970 to September 2020. The settled case was described but not included in the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to report our findings, and when appropriate. The P ≤ .05 decision rule was established a priori as the null hypothesis rejection criterion to determine associations between jury verdicts outcomes and state's tort reform status. RESULTS: In this study, 39 cases were identified and met the study's inclusion criteria from the entire Westlaw Edge database. Among plaintiffs who disclosed age and/or gender, median age was 35.0 years with a female majority (67.6%). Cases involving TOS were noted to be steadily decreasing since the mid-1990s. The cases were unevenly spread across 18 states, with the highest number of cases (14, 35.9%) from California and the second highest (4, 10.3%) from Pennsylvania. A similar uneven distribution was seen among U.S. census regions, in which the West had the highest cases (39.5%). The study revealed that more cases were brought to trials in tort reform states (26, 68.4%) than in non-tort reform states (12, 31.6%). A total of 24 of 39 (61.5%) plaintiffs had one specific claim, which resulted in their economic and noneconomic damages. Negligent operation and treatment complication represented an overwhelming majority of claims brought by 38 of 39 plaintiffs (97.4%). Misdiagnosis and lack of informed consent were both brought nine times (23.1%) by the group. Intraoperative nerve injury (20 patients, 51.3%) was the most commonly reported complication. Excluding one case with a settlement of $965,000, 30 of 38 (78.9%) cases went to trials and received defense verdicts. Eight cases (20.5%) were found in favor of plaintiffs with a median payout of $725,581. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted higher than average payouts to plaintiffs and risk factors that may result in malpractice lawsuits for surgeons undertaking TOS treatment. Future studies are needed to further clarify the relationships between tort reform and outcomes of malpractice cases involving TOS.
Assuntos
Compensação e Reparação , Descompressão Cirúrgica/economia , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/economia , Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Imperícia/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Síndrome do Desfiladeiro Torácico/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia , Adulto , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados Factuais , Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/legislação & jurisprudência , Masculino , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Síndrome do Desfiladeiro Torácico/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
Background and purpose - Patients in the Swedish healthcare system are insured against avoidable adverse events via Landstingens Ömsesidiga Försäkringsbolag (LÖF). We assessed the reasons for compensation claims reported to LÖF following an ACL injury. Patients and methods - We searched the LÖF database for compensation claims related to ACL injuries reported in 2005-2014, and cross-matched claims with the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. We then performed a review of the medical records. Results - We identified 530 eligible claims in 2005-2014. 352 (66%) claims were accepted by LÖF and 178 claims were rejected. Accepted claims corresponded to fewer than 1% of ACL surgeries performed in the same period. The most common reasons for an accepted claim were postoperative septic arthritis followed by suboptimal surgery and delay in diagnosis and treatment. Interpretation - There are different reasons for accepting a compensation claim following an ACL injury, which represents different treatment errors that can be avoided.
Assuntos
Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/efeitos adversos , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/economia , Compensação e Reparação , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Suécia , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Erros Médicos/efeitos adversos , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/prevenção & controle , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Anestesiologistas , Testes Obrigatórios , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Inabilitação do Médico , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Anestesiologistas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Testes Obrigatórios/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Segurança do Paciente , Inabilitação do Médico/economia , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Uso Recreativo de Drogas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/economia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/economiaRESUMO
Background and purpose - Orthopedic surgery is one of the specialties with most compensation claims. We assessed the claims following knee arthroplasty surgery reported to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE) in light of institutional procedure volume.Patients and methods - We collected data from NPE and the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) for the study period (2008-2018). Age, sex, type of claim, and reason for compensation were collected from NPE, while the number of arthroplasty surgeries was collected from NAR. The treating hospitals were grouped by quartiles according to annual procedure volume. The effect of hospital volume on the likelihood of an accepted claim was estimated.Results - NAR received 64,241 reports of arthroplasty procedures, of which 572 (0.9%) patients filed a claim for treatment injury. 55% of the claims were accepted, representing 0.5% of all knee arthroplasties. The most common reason for accepted claim was a hospital-acquired infection, in 28% of the patients, followed by misplaced implant (26%) and aseptic loosening (13%). The hospitals with the lowest annual volume (57 or fewer arthroplasties per year, first quarter) had a statistically significantly larger fraction of granted claims per procedures compared with other institutions.Interpretation - The overall risk of ending up with compensation due to treatment error following knee arthroplasty was 0.5%. The risk of accepted claim was greater for patients operated in the lowest volume hospitals.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/economia , Compensação e Reparação , Erros Médicos/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Falha de Prótese , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Adverse surgical events are a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and disability worldwide. Serious reportable events, such as wrong site surgery, retained foreign bodies, and surgical fires, are preventable adverse events that have significant consequences. These "never events" are costly to the patient, health care systems, and society and have led to many efforts to reduce their occurrence. However, these costly events still occur, and more research is needed to obtain a better understanding of their causes and how to prevent them.
Assuntos
Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Segurança do Paciente/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , HumanosRESUMO
Importance: It is important to recognize factors that may mitigate the risk of a potential lawsuit and increase knowledge and awareness of physicians. Objective: To evaluate and characterize facial nerve paralysis litigation claims and related potential causes. Design, Setting, and Participants: These data were extracted from the two main computerized legal databases: WestLaw and LexisNexis. The data were queried on April 2, 2020. The records from 1919 to 2020 were obtained from a population-based setting. A total of 186 cases were included. Data were gathered for all alleged cases of facial nerve paralysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: There was a continuous rise in the amount of malpractice payments with the highest mean amount being in the past decade. Results: From 1919 to 2020, a total of 186 malpractice cases for facial nerve damage were identified. A total amount of $89,178,857.99 was rewarded to plaintiffs in 66 cases. The mean amount of paid malpractice claim was $1,351,194.80. Improper performance/treatment was the most common reason for alleged litigation (n = 97). This was followed by misdiagnosis/delayed diagnosis (n = 47), and failure of informed consent (n = 34). The highest number of malpractice claims with a total of 53 cases was from 1991 to 2000. The highest mean amount per payment was in the past decade (2011-2020) with a mean of $3,841,052.68. Conclusions and Relevance: Over the past century, improper performance/procedure, delayed/misdiagnosis, and failure of informed consent were the most common reasons for litigations related to facial nerve paralysis.
Assuntos
Traumatismos do Nervo Facial/etiologia , Paralisia Facial/etiologia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Otolaringologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Cirurgia Plástica/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados Factuais , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Erros de Diagnóstico/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros de Diagnóstico/tendências , Traumatismos do Nervo Facial/economia , Traumatismos do Nervo Facial/epidemiologia , Paralisia Facial/economia , Paralisia Facial/epidemiologia , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/estatística & dados numéricos , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/tendências , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/tendências , Otolaringologia/economia , Otolaringologia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Cirurgia Plástica/economia , Cirurgia Plástica/tendências , Estados UnidosRESUMO
SUMMARY: The current status of the plastic surgeon in the medical liability spectrum and ways to avoid litigation are explored by using pooled national data from the Medical Professional Liability Association, private information from Applied Medico-Legal Solutions RRG, and a detailed literature search. The medical liability system in the United States costs $55.6 billion, or 2.4 percent of total health care spending. Plastic surgery accounts for 3.31 percent of reported claims and 3.16 percent of paid claims. Total payments for plastic surgeons represent 1.75 percent of the total paid for all specialties. Malpractice awards are relatively light for plastic surgeons. Nevertheless, they still have a 15 percent chance per year of being sued. However, 93 percent of cases will close with a dismissal or a settlement, and only 7 percent will go to trial. Of these, the plastic surgeon will prevail in 79 percent. Most importantly, 75 percent of all cases will result in no payment. To minimize the chances of a lawsuit, plastic surgeons should maintain excellent communication with their patients and participate in shared decision-making. They should take a leadership role and buy in to the performance of perioperative checklists, embrace patient education, and actively participate in Maintenance of Certification. They should be transparent in their dealings with patients by preoperatively declaring their policies on revisions, refunds, complications, and payments. Plastic surgeons must maintain complete and accurate medical records and participate in hospital-based programs of prophylaxis. They should be aware that postoperative infection is the single costliest adverse outcome and proactively deal with it.
Assuntos
Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Cirurgia Plástica/economia , Lista de Checagem/normas , Comunicação , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/economia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/economia , Cirurgiões/legislação & jurisprudência , Cirurgiões/normas , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Plástica/normas , Cirurgia Plástica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The safety of parenteral nutrition (PN) remains a concern in preterm neonates, impacting clinical outcomes and health-care-resource use and costs. This cost-consequence analysis assessed national-level impacts of a 10-percentage point increase in use of industry-prepared three-chamber bags (3CBs) on clinical outcomes, healthcare resources, and hospital budgets across seven European countries. A ten-percentage-point 3CB use-increase model was developed for Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the UK. The cost-consequence analysis estimated the impact on compounding error harm and bloodstream infection (BSI) rates, staff time, and annual hospital budget. Of 265,000 (52%) preterm neonates, 133,000 (52%) were estimated to require PN. Baseline compounding methods were estimated as 43% pharmacy manual, 16% pharmacy automated, 22% ward, 9% outsourced, 3% industry provided non-3CBs, and 7% 3CBs. A modeled increased 3CB use would change these values to 39%, 15%, 18%, 9%, 3%, and 17%, respectively. Modeled consequences included -11.6% for harm due to compounding errors and -2.7% for BSIs. Labor time saved would equate to 41 specialized nurses, 29 senior pharmacists, 26 pharmacy assistants, and 22 senior pediatricians working full time. Budget impact would be a 8,960,601 (3.4%) fall from 260,329,814 to 251,369,212. Even a small increase in the use of 3CBs in preterm neonates could substantially improve neonatal clinical outcomes, and provide notable resource and cost savings to hospitals.
Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo/economia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/economia , Nutrição Parenteral/economia , Nutrição Parenteral/métodos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Orçamentos , Redução de Custos , Composição de Medicamentos/economia , Composição de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Nutrição Parenteral/estatística & dados numéricos , SegurançaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Financial incentives represent a potential mechanism to encourage infection prevention by hospitals. In order to characterize the place of financial incentives, we investigated resource utilization and cost associated with hospital-acquired infections (HAI) and assessed the relative financial burden for hospital and insurer according to reimbursement policies. METHODS: We conducted a prospective matched case-control study over 18 months in a tertiary university medical center. Patients with central-line associated blood-stream infections (CLABSI), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) or surgical site infections (SSI) were each matched to three control patients. Resource utilization, costs and reimbursement (per diem for CLABSI and CDI, diagnosis related group (DRG) reimbursement for SSI) were compared between patients and controls, from both the hospital and insurer perspective. RESULTS: HAIs were associated with increased resource consumption (more blood tests, imaging, antibiotic days, hospital days etc.). Direct costs were higher for cases vs. controls (CLABSI: $6400 vs. $2376 (p < 0.001), CDI: $1357 vs $733 (p = 0.047) and SSI: $6761 vs. $5860 (p < 0.001)). However as admissions were longer following CLABSI and CDI, costs per-day were non-significantly different (USD/day, cases vs. controls: CLABSI, 601 vs. 719, (p = 0.63); CDI, 101 vs. 93 (p = 0.5)). For CLABSI and CDI, reimbursement was per-diem and thus the financial burden ($14,608 and $5430 respectively) rested on the insurer, not the hospital. For SSI, as reimbursement was per procedure, costs rested primarily on the hospital rather than the insurer. CONCLUSION: Nosocomial infections are associated with both increased resource utilization and increased length of stay. Reimbursement strategy (per diem vs DRG) is the principal parameter affecting financial incentives to prevent hospital acquired infections and depends on the payer perspective. In the Israeli health care system, financial incentives are unlikely to represent a significant consideration in the prevention of CLABSI and CDI.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Economia Hospitalar , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções por Clostridium/economia , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate the general characteristics, economic burden, causative drugs and medical errors associated with litigation involving severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCADRs) in China, with the aims of improving rational medication use and reducing the extent of damage from SCADRs. METHODS: This study analysed 150 lawsuit judgements involving SCADRs from 2005 to 2019, collected from China Judgments Online. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In total, 50% of lawsuits stemmed from SCADRs occurring in general hospitals. The average time elapsed from the date of occurrence of the SCADRs to the end of litigation procedures was 1055 days. Of the patients involved, 51% were female and more than two thirds (69%) were under 60 years old. The most common outcome of SCADRs was death (39%), followed by disabilities (30%). The average responsibility of the medical provider was 48 ± 29%. The average amount of compensation was $43 424. Of the cases studied, 51% of SCADRs were Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis, which together accounted for 75% of cases with known clinical subtype. The overall average economic burden of SCADRs was $99 178, of which indirect costs made up the largest proportion (more than 60%). The most common causative drug groups were antimicrobial drugs (49%), Chinese patent medicine and Chinese herbal medicine (17%), and antipyretic analgesics (16%). Finally, 61% of medical errors were found to stem from violation of duty of care, 20% from violation of informed consent and 18% from violations related to the medical record writing and management system. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions not only severely affect patient survival and quality of life, but also impose a heavy economic burden in terms of health care and societal costs. Medical providers should be better educated on strategies to reduce risk to patients and establish mechanisms of risk sharing and management.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Toxidermias/epidemiologia , Legislação de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China , Toxidermias/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Jurisprudência , Masculino , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/economia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In Norway, all patient-reported claims for compensation are evaluated by The Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE). The number of claims from women with cervical cancer is rising, and the approval rate is high. Our aim was to study claims for compensation from women with cervical cancer to identify the type of failures, when, during the time-course of treatment, the medical failures occurred, and the consequences of the failures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study of claims for compensation to NPE from cervical cancer patients during a 12-year period, from 2007 through 2018. We used anonymized medical expert statements and summaries of NPE cases. RESULTS: In all, 161 women claimed compensation for alleged medical failure related to cervical cancer. Compensation was approved for 100 (62%) women. Mean age at the time of alleged failure was 37.5 years (SD ±9.9). The main reasons why women sought medical attention were routine cervical screening (56%), or vaginal bleeding or discharge (30%). In approved cases, incorrect evaluation of cytology and histology was the cause of most failures (72%). Mean delay of cervical cancer diagnosis for approved cases was 28 months (SD ±22). Treatment not in accordance with guidelines was the cause of failure in 2% of the cases, and failure during follow up was the cause of failure in 12%. Consequences of the failures were as follows: worsening of cancer prognosis (89%), treatment-induced adverse effects, such as loss of fertility (43%) and/or loss of ovarian function in premenopausal women (50%), and permanent injury after chemo-radiation (27%). Seven women (7%) died, most probably as a consequence of the failure. CONCLUSIONS: The main cause of medical failure in women with cervical cancer was incorrect pathological diagnosis. The main consequences of failures were worsening of cancer prognosis and treatment-induced adverse effects. Increased focus on the quality of pathological examinations, and better routines in all parts of the cervical examinations might improve patient safety for women in risk of cervical cancer.
Assuntos
Compensação e Reparação , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Oncologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine colorectal cancer (CRC) malpractice suits over the past 20 years in the United States and evaluate the most common allegations, lawsuit outcomes, indemnity payment amounts, patient outcomes, and physician characteristics. METHODS: The malpractice section of VerdictSearch, a legal database, was queried for cases in which CRC was a principle component of the lawsuit. Legal notes were used to characterize plaintiff allegations, verdict, financial compensation, and case year. Clinical history for each case were analyzed for patient demographics, medical outcomes, and physician characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 240 CRC-related malpractice cases (1988-2018) were collected, resulting in defense (n = 101, 42.1%), plaintiff (n = 37, 15.4%), or settlement (n = 96, 40%) verdict. The primary defendants were often primary care physicians (n = 61, 25.4%) and gastroenterologists (n = 55, 22.9%). Most common plaintiff allegations are failure to perform diagnostic colonoscopy for patients with symptoms (n = 67, 27.9%), failure to perform screening colonoscopy according to screening guidelines (n = 46, 19.2%), or failure to detect CRC with colonoscopy (n = 45, 18.7%). A common alleged error in diagnosis before the median year of 2005 was failure to detect CRC by the noncolonoscopic methods (<2005: n = 22, 24.2%; >2005: n = 3, 3.09%). DISCUSSION: Plaintiff-alleged errors in diagnosis are consistently the most common reason for CRC malpractice litigation in the past 20 years, whereas specific diagnostic allegations (i.e., failure to screen vs failure to detect) and methods used for surveillance may vary over time. It is important to identify such pitfalls in CRC screening and explore areas for improvement to maximize patient care and satisfaction and reduce physician malpractice litigations.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Colonoscopia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Imperícia/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze litigation involving compartment syndrome to identify the causes and outcomes of such malpractice suits. A better understanding of such litigation may provide insight into areas where clinicians may make improvements in the delivery of care. METHODS: Jury verdict reviews from the Westlaw database from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2018 were reviewed. The search term "compartment syndrome" was used to identify cases and extract data on the specialty of the physician defendant, the demographics of the plaintiff, the allegation, and the verdict. RESULTS: A total of 124 individual cases involving the diagnosis of compartment syndrome were identified. Medical centers or the hospital was included as a defendant in 51.6% of cases. The most frequent physician defendants were orthopedic surgeons (45.96%) and emergency medicine physicians (20.16%), followed by cardiothoracic/vascular surgeons (16.93%). Failure to diagnose was the most frequently cited claim (71.8% of cases). Most plaintiffs were men, with a mean age of 36.7 years, suffering injuries for an average of 5 years before their verdict. Traumatic compartment syndrome of the lower extremity causing nerve damage was the most common complication attributed to failure to diagnose, leading to litigation. Forty cases (32.25%) were found for the plaintiff or settled, with an average award of $1,553,993.66. CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers a brief overview of the most common defendants, plaintiffs, and injuries involved in legal disputes involving compartment syndrome. Orthopedic surgeons were most commonly named; however, vascular surgeons may also be involved in these cases because of the large number of cases with associated arterial involvement. A significant percentage of cases were plaintiff verdicts or settled cases. Failure to diagnosis or delay in treatment was the most common causes of malpractice litigation. Compartment syndrome is a clinical diagnosis and requires a high level of suspicion for a timely diagnosis. Lack of objective criteria for diagnosis increases the chances of medical errors and makes it an area vulnerable to litigation.
Assuntos
Síndromes Compartimentais , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Diagnóstico Tardio/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto , Síndromes Compartimentais/diagnóstico , Síndromes Compartimentais/economia , Síndromes Compartimentais/mortalidade , Síndromes Compartimentais/terapia , Diagnóstico Tardio/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/economia , Masculino , Imperícia/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/mortalidade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadeAssuntos
Prova Pericial/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Modelagem Computacional Específica para o Paciente , Impressão Tridimensional/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/legislação & jurisprudência , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Compreensão , Prova Pericial/economia , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Imperícia/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Segurança do Paciente , Modelagem Computacional Específica para o Paciente/economia , Impressão Tridimensional/economia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economiaAssuntos
Medicina Defensiva , Análise Custo-Benefício , Medicina Defensiva/economia , Medicina Defensiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Defensiva/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We conducted a descriptive study to evaluate any changes in practice behaviour regarding the provision of hydrocortisone and lignocaine (H&L) injections among doctors and how an H&L injection is priced following a disciplinary proceeding decision. A doctor had been fined SGD 100,000 for failing to obtain informed consent before an H&L injection. METHODS: We performed a survey shortly after the disciplinary decision to ascertain: (a) the category of the respondent; (b) whether the respondent provided H&L injections and how much he charged before the decision; and (c) after the decision. All members of the Singapore Medical Association and College of Family Physicians Singapore are doctors and were invited to participate. RESULTS: 1,927 doctors responded to the survey. Prior to the decision, 804 doctors did not perform H&L injections; this increased by 20.4% to 968 after the decision. The number of doctors who gave H&L injections decreased by 164 (14.6%), from the previous 1,123. Pre-decision, doctors who determined their own price for H&L injections charged a median pricing ≤ SGD 100. Post-decision, the median charge rose to > SGD 100 to SGD 200. At higher price bands, the number of doctors who charged > SGD 1,000 increased eight-fold, from eight to 65. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated how a disciplinary decision can affect practice behaviour, and specifically how doctors may choose to not offer a service, an example of defensive medicine through avoidance behaviour. It also showed how prices for a service can rise following such a decision, which demonstrates the concept of negative general deterrence in sentencing.
Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais , Anti-Inflamatórios , Tomada de Decisões , Hidrocortisona , Lidocaína , Erros Médicos , Médicos/economia , Médicos/psicologia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Anestésicos Locais/economia , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/economia , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Disciplina no Trabalho/economia , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/economia , Hidrocortisona/uso terapêutico , Lidocaína/economia , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/psicologia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Médicos de Família , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Singapura , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To provide preliminary estimates of incident disclosure behaviors on medical malpractice claims. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive analysis of data on medical malpractice claims obtained from the Controlled Risk Insurance Company and Risk Management Foundation of Harvard Medical Institutions (Cambridge, Massachusetts) between 2012 and 2013 (n = 434). The characteristics of disclosure and apology after medical errors were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 434 medical malpractice claims, 4.6% (n = 20) medical errors had been disclosed to the patient at the time of the error, and 5.9% (n = 26) had been followed by disclosure and apology. The highest number of disclosed injuries occurred in 2011 (23.9%; n = 11) and 2012 (34.8%; n = 16). There was no incremental increase during the financial years studied (2012-2013). The mean age of informed patients was 52.96 years, 58.7 % of the patients were female, and 52.2% were inpatients. Of the disclosed errors, 26.1% led to an adverse reaction, and 17.4% were fatal. The cause of disclosed medical error was improper surgical performance in 17.4% (95% confidence interval, 6.4-28.4). Disclosed medical errors were classified as medium severity in 67.4%. No apology statement was issued in 54.5% of medical errors classified as high severity. CONCLUSIONS: At the health-care centers studied, when a claim followed a medical error, providers infrequently disclosed medical errors or apologized to the patient or relatives. Most of the medical errors followed by disclosure and apology were classified as being of high and medium severity. No changes were detected in the volume of lawsuits over time.
Assuntos
Revelação/tendências , Imperícia/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze malpractice cases involving hemodialysis access to prevent future litigation and improve physician education. METHODS: Jury verdict reviews from the WESTLAW database from 1 January 2005 to 1 January 2015 were reviewed. The search terms "hemodialysis," "dialysis," "graft," "fistula," "AVG," "AVF," "arteriovenous," "catheter," "permacatheter," and "shiley" were used to compile data on the demographics of the defendant, plaintiff, allegation, complication, and verdict. RESULTS: Sixty-six cases involving the litigation pertaining to hemodialysis catheter, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) were obtained. Of these, 55% involved catheter-based hemodialysis access, 18% involved AVF, and 27% involved AVG. The most frequent physician defendants were vascular surgeons (36%), internists (14%), nephrologists (14%), general surgeons (9%), and interventional radiologists (6%). Of the patients, 38% involved were male and the average patient age was 56.3 (standard deviation (SD) = 20.1) years. Region of injury was 50% in the neck or chest, 42% in the arm, and 8% in the groin. Injury was listed as death in 79% of cases. Of the deaths, 95% involved bleeding at some point in the chain of events. The most common claims related to the cases were failure to perform the surgery or procedure safely (44%), failure to diagnose and treat in a timely manner (30%), and negligent hemodialysis treatment (11%). The most common complications cited were hemorrhage (62%), loss of function of limb (15%), and ischemia due to steal syndrome (11%). A total of 26 cases (39%) were found for the plaintiff or settled. The median award was US$463,000 with a mean of US$985,299 (SD = US$1,314,557). CONCLUSION: While popular opinion may indicate that steal syndrome is a commonly litigated complication, our data reveal that the most common injury litigated is death which may frequently be the result of a hemorrhagic episode. In addition to hemorrhage, the remaining most common complications included steal syndrome and loss of limb function. Therefore, steps to better prevent, diagnose and treat bleeding, nerve injury, and steal syndrome in a timely manner are critical to preventing hemodialysis-access-associated litigation.