Significance of the board-certified surgeon systems and clinical practice guideline adherence to surgical treatment of esophageal cancer in Japan: a questionnaire survey of departments registered in the National Clinical Database.

BACKGROUND: It remains unknown how much institutional medical structure and process of implementation of clinical practice guidelines for esophageal cancers can improve quality of surgical outcome in Japan. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire survey was performed for departments registered in the National Clinical Database in Japan from October 2014 to January 2015. Quality indicators (QIs) including structure and process indicators (clinical practice guideline adherence) were evaluated on the risk-adjusted odds ratio for operative mortality (AOR) of the patients using registered cases in the database who underwent esophagectomy and reconstruction in 2013 and 2014. RESULTS: Among 916 departments which registered at least one esophagectomy case during the study period, 454 departments (49.6%) responded to the questionnaire. Analyses of 6661 cases revealed that two structure QIs (certification of training hospitals by Japan Esophageal Society and presence of board-certified esophageal surgeons) were associated with significantly lower AOR (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). One highly recommended process QI regarding preoperative chemotherapy had strong tendency to associate with lower AOR (p = 0.053). In two process QIs, the answer "performed at the doctor's discretion" showed a significant negative impact on prognosis, suggesting importance of institutional uniformity. CONCLUSIONS: The medical institutional structure of board-certified training sites for esophageal surgeons and of participation of board-certified esophageal surgeons improves surgical outcome in Japan. Establishment of appropriate QIs and their uniform implementation would be crucial for future quality improvement of medical care in esophagectomy.

Esophageal Reconstruction with the Stomach, a Functional Dilemma?

Background: A few decades ago, esophageal substitution was mainly dedicated particularly in postcaustic esophageal stenosis; currently, the reconstruction has expanded its palette of indications to other areas of benign esophageal pathology (severe motor disorders, esophageal achalasia with multiple relapses, peptic stenosis, etc.) but has also become a quasi-obligatory final time in the esophagectomy for cancer whenever it is possible. The techniques of esophageal reconstruction using the stomach, regardless of the indication and the chosen technical option, remain a valuable and effective method. A number of striking arguments advocate for one or another type of gastric graft: anatomic factors more than convenient (vascularization, sufficient length, a wall structure favorable for suture, etc.) and a sustainable surgical intervention (length, approach, complexity of the surgical steps digestive disorders after surgery, post-therapeutic functionality, etc.). Choosing a technique or another, beyond pathological arguments, should take into account remote functionality, with a clear impact on metabolic status and quality of life. So, according to this criterion, can we functionally justify a type or another of gastric restoration? Finally, the proof of an adequate solution is relatively easy to appreciate: has swallowing been restored and if so, the result has been maintained over time? For oncological cases, the assessment should also take into account the chronological criterion of the postoperative survival rate. Methods: The statistically rated lot ranged from 1981 to 2016 and included 268 patients with surgical interventions for esophageal stenosis, distributed according to etiopathogenesis and indication in 201 reconstructions for post-caustic stenosis, and 67 for post-esophagectomy replacement for neoplasm. The techniques used for remote functional evaluation included: barium swallow, endoscopy + biopsy, and in cases with obvious changes pH measurement/24 h and manometry and, only in exceptional cases, scintigraphy with marked foods. Results: two types of problems have been identified: a particular type of neuro-motor dysfunction of the esophageal substitute in 6 patients (1 patient with Gavriliu reconstruction and 5 with Nakayama reconstruction, using the whole stomach), with difficulty, delayed gastric graft evacuation, with major stasis and abdominal discomfort vomiting, inability to eat, aspiration phenomena) respectively a reflux pathology - 8 patients, being proved by a specific simptomatology, barium lunch, endoscopic examination and pH-metric examination. Reflux was alkaline in 7 patients, all with pyloroplasty, 5 with whole stomach and 2 with Akiyama procedure; in 1 case with Gavriliu procedure the reflux was acid. Conclusions: Stomach is a good option in esophageal substitution. Concerning the remote results, a good functionality is found with a reasonable metabolic status. The two phenomena on which the function of the graft depends - secretory activity and motor activity - seem to be restored in time but these does not occur concurrently, the recovery of the secretory function being much faster.

Influence of the Extent and Dose of Radiation on Complications After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Subsequent Esophagectomy With Gastric Tube Reconstruction With a Cervical Anastomosis.

PURPOSE: To determine, in a large series, the influence of the extent and dose of radiation to the fundus of the stomach and mediastinum on the development and severity of anastomotic complications in patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2005 and 2012, 364 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (41.4 Gy combined with chemotherapy) followed by esophagectomy were included. The future anastomotic region in the fundus was determined, and the mean dose, V20-V40, and upper planning target volume border in relation to mediastinal length, expressed as the mediastinal ratio, were calculated. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 22% and anastomotic stenosis in 41%. Logistic regression analysis revealed no influence of age, comorbidity, mean fundus dose, V20-V40, or the mediastinal ratio on the incidence of anastomotic leakage or anastomotic stenosis. In 28% of the patients severe complications (Clavien-Dindo score of ≥IIIB) occurred. The presence of multiple comorbidities (hazard ratio 2.4 [95% confidence interval 1.3-4.5], P=.006) and a mediastinal ratio of 0.5 to 1.0 (hazard ratio 1.9 [95% confidence interval 1.0-3.5], P=.036) were both independent predictors of severe complications. CONCLUSION: With a mean radiation dose of 24.2 Gy to the future anastomotic region of the gastric fundus, the radiation dose was not associated with the incidence of anastomotic leakage or anastomotic stenosis. The incidence of severe complications was associated with a high superior mediastinal planning target volume border.

Complex Esophageal Reconstruction Procedures Have Acceptable Outcomes Compared With Routine Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Complex esophageal reconstruction (CER) is defined as restoring esophageal continuity in a previously operated field, using a nongastric conduit, or after esophageal diversion. This study compares the outcomes of CER with non-CER (NCER), which uses an undisturbed stomach for reconstruction. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective cohort study compares 75 CERs with 75 NCERs from 1995 to 2014 that were matched for cancer versus benign disease. Distributions of demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and complications were compared between CER and NCER. Odds of mortality at 30 and 90 days were calculated with logistic regression. Overall survival was illustrated with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Although patients were similar in age, sex, and preoperative comorbidities, more non-white patients underwent CER (p = 0.04). Most NCER patients had adenocarcinoma (44%) or Barrett's high-grade dysplasia (39%); most CER patients had other benign disease (44%) or squamous cell carcinoma (24%, p < 0.01). CER had statistically significantly higher rates of reoperation, pneumonia, infection, and gastrointestinal complications, and longer median length of stay than NCER. Odds of mortality for CER and NCER at 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.0, 95% CI: 0.1 to 16.3), 90 days (OR 2.6, 95% CI: 0.5 to 13.9) and overall (adjusted hazard ratio 1.56, 95% CI: 0.9 to 2.7) were not statistically significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NCER, CER patients had higher rates of return to the operating room, more postoperative infections and gastrointestinal complications, and longer length of stay. However, 30-day, 90-day, and overall survival were similar. CER should be offered to patients with acceptable risks and anticipated long-term survival.

Postoperative functional result and quality of life after oesophageal reconstruction based on the type of cervical anastomosis.

INTRODUCTION: The keystone of the rate of postoperative complications and functional outcome in oesophageal reconstruction is the technique method of performing cervical anastomosis.Despite new technologies and improved technique in specialized centres, post-anastomosis complications have not significantly improved. PURPOSE: The goal of our study is to analyse the causes that make anastomosis with the oesophagus hypopharynx a particular case. If anatomical and morphological aspects cannot be adjusted (poor histological structure and vascularity etc.), some important elements for performing a good anastomosis can be identified and corrected. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between 1981-2014, 195 oesophageal reconstructions were performed in our clinic. Our study involved an analysis of 72 cases (2000-2014), based on a statistical evaluation by Kaplan-Meier method that considered as eries of factors (oesophagus hypopharynx as anastomotic partner, stomach, jejuno-ileum, colon as visceral partner,pharyngotomy type, T-L, T-T, L-L, L-T type anastomosis,number of anastomotic layers). RESULTS were compared with those obtained by standard clinical and laboratory investigation,analysing the post-therapeutic outcome using three criteria (clinical aspects of swallowing, barium swallow and endoscopy) and by subjective assessment by each patient of his her state and complaints, with effects on long-term functional outcome (dysphagia, reflux, pain, asthenia, weight loss, hoarseness). RESULTS: Statistical analysis determined that only some of the analysed factors proved to be valuable. The higher the level of the anastomosis, the more intense the impairment of the digestive function. The jejunum and left colon proved to bemost effective anastomotic partners. The best method for implantation seems to be T-T or T-L and the number of anastomosis layers has no influence on postoperative outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Acquired data can influence to some extent the operatory technique, with a lower complication rate.Unfortunately, laborious technical aspects and specific anatomical limitations make this goal difficult to achieve.

[Respiratory complications following resection and reconstruction of the esophagus]. / Complicatiile respiratorii dupa chirurgia de rezectie si reconstructie esofagiana.

Esophageal resection remains a dreadfull surgical intervention accompanied by consistently higher morbidity and mortality when compared with other surgical procedures. The respiratory complications are the most important contributor to morbidity and mortality after this kind of surgery. Intimate knowledge on risk factors and physiopathology and careful treatment of these complications go with good postoperative results. This article discusses the factors affecting respiratory complications and strategies to reduce the incidence of these complications after esophagectomy

Should patients with esophageal atresia be submitted to esophageal substitution before they start walking?

Esophagocoloplasty and gastric transposition are two major methods for esophageal substitution in children with esophageal atresia, and there is broad agreement that these operations should not be performed before the children start walking. However, there are some reported advantages of performing such operations in the first months of life or in the neonatal period. In this study, we compared our experience with esophageal substitution procedures performed in walking children with esophageal atresia, with the outcomes of children who had the operation before the third month of life reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to establish if we have to wait until the children start walking before indicating the esophageal replacement procedure. From February 1978 to October 2009, 129 children with esophageal atresia underwent esophageal replacement in our hospital (99 colonic interpositions and 30 gastric transpositions). The records of these patients were reviewed for data regarding demographics, complications (leaks, graft failures, strictures, and graft torsion), and mortality and compared with those reported in the two main articles on esophageal replacement in the neonatal period or in patients less than 3 months of age. The main complication of our casuistic was cervical anastomosis leakage, which sealed spontaneously in all except in four patients. One patient of the esophagocoloplasty group developed graft necrosis and three patients in the gastric transposition group had gastric outlet obstruction, secondary to axial torsion of the stomach placed in the retrosternal space. The long-term outcome of the patients in both groups was considered good to excellent in terms of normal weight gain, absence of dysphagia, and other gastrointestinal symptoms. The comparisons of the main complications and mortality rates in walking children with esophageal substitutions performed in the first months of life showed that the incidences of cervical anastomotic leaks and graft failures were similar, but mortality rate in the first few months of life was significantly greater than that observed in our group of patients (P= 0.001). Based on the comparison of our results with those of published series, we conclude that the recommendation of performing esophagocoloplasty or total gastric transposition in children with esophageal atresia after they start walking is still valid.

Prevalence and outcome of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in a UK regional cancer network.

The aim of this study was to determine the contemporary prevalence, outcome, and survival after esophagogastric anastomotic leakage (EGAL) following esophagectomy by a regional upper gastrointestinal cancer network and to investigate etiological factors. Two hundred forty consecutive patients underwent esophagectomy over a 10-year period (median age 61 [31-79] years, 147 transthoracic and 93 transhiatal esophagectomy, 105 neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 49 chemoradiotherapy). The primary outcome measures were the development of EGAL and survival. Twenty patients developed EGAL (8.3%, 15 managed conservatively, 5 reoperation). Overall operative mortality was 2% (5 patients in total, 1 after EGAL). Median, 1 and 2-year survival was 22 months, 73% and 50%, in patients after EGAL, compared with 31 months, 80% and 56%, in patients who did not suffer EGAL (P= 0.314). On multivariate analysis, low body mass indices (hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.79, P= 0.016), individual surgeon (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.43, P= 0.02), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.16-9.22, P= 0.024) were significantly associated with the development of EGAL. EGAL following esophagectomy remained common, but associated mortality was less common than reported in earlier Western series and long-term survival was unaffected.

Surgical management of carcinoma of the cervical esophagus.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics, reconstruction methods after resection, and prognosis of cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Seventy-four with squamous cell carcinomas of the cervical esophagus not previously treated who underwent cervical esophagectomy or total esophagectomy with or without laryngectomy were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The operative morbidity and in-hospital mortality rates were 34% (25 patients) and 4% (3 patients), respectively. Alimentary continuity was achieved with free jejunal transfer (50 patients), gastric pull-up (19 patients), and other procedures (5 patients). The frequencies of postoperative complications and death did not differ between free jejunal transfer and gastric pull-up. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 42% and 33%, respectively. The significant clinicopathological factors affecting survival were patient gender, high T factor, lymph node involvement, palpable cervical lymph nodes, vocal cord paralysis, lymphatic invasion, and extracapsular invasion. The pattern of first failure was most often locoregional (82%, 36 patients). CONCLUSION: The choice of free jejunal transfer or gastric pull-up for reconstruction after surgical resection of cervical esophageal carcinoma depends on the degree of tumor extension. Adverse factors affecting survival should be considered when candidates for the surgery are selected.

[Reinterventions for complication and defect of coloesophagoplasty]. / Réinterventions pour complications et séquelles d'oesophagoplastie colique.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To report a series of 17 patients operated for a complication oesophagocoloplasty, with evaluation of therapeutic modalities, and both early and distant results. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From 1985 to 2003, 17 patients with a mean age of 50 years (range: 23-76) were reoperated after coloplasty pediculated on left superior colic vessels. Initial diseases were caustic ingestion (N=7), cancer (N=6), oesophageal perforation (N=2), gastric lymphoma (N=1) and oesotracheal fistula (N=1). Coloplasty has been performed as a first-intent procedure in 13 cases and as a second-intent procedure after failure of a previous operation in 4 cases. Nine patients were initially operated in another center and were subsequently referred in our unit. Complications needing reoperation were graft necrosis in 8 cases (47%) and stricture in 9 cases (53%). All patients with necrosis were reoperated within the 10 first postoperative days. RESULTS: Necroses were treated by complete (N=5) or partial (N=3) resection of the coloplasty. Strictures were treated by resection-reanastomosis (N=3), right ileocoloplasty (N=2), colic stricturoplasty (N=2), a free antebrachial flap (N=1) and a tubulized latissimus dorsi myocutaneous pedicled flap (N=1). The 30-day mortality rate was 12% (N=2) and the overall morbidity rate was 66%. All deaths occurred after reoperation for necrosis. Eleven patients (65%) kept or recovered digestive continuity (including the 9 with stenosis) and 8 (73%) eat normally. Four patients with transplant necrosis died before reestablishment. Four patients operated for necrosis died before restoration of digestive continuity and 2 patients are still awaiting restoration. CONCLUSION: Use of colon as an oesophageal substitute is risky. Reoperations for stenosis allows satisfactory oral feeding, while reoperation for necrosis is associated with both high early mortality and a low rate of restoration or digestive continuity. This later requires a range of complex surgical procedures.

[Esophagoplasty using modified sleeve-type intrathoracic anastomosis].

Anastomotic leakage due to loosening of sutures is the frequent cause of lethality. To prevent such complication, a sleeve-type esophago-enteric and esophagogastric anastomosis was used. Its design eliminates the major cause of failure--the basic sutures running through the soft muscular wall of the esophagus. The new anastomosis was used in ca. 42 patients: Lewis operation (24), proximal resection of the stomach and distal thoracic part of the esophagus and adjuvant intrapleural esophagoplasty with the distal end of the stomach (8), gastrectomy with resection of the distal thoracic part of the esophagus and concomitant intrapleural esophagoplasty with small intestine (S.S.Yudin) (10). Postoperative complications were reported in 18 patients (42.9%); lethality--11.9%. No leaking esophageal anastomosis was registered.

[Esophagoplasty with the colon in flap patients with burn strictures of the esophagus]. / Plastika pishchevoda tolstoi kishkoi u bol'nykh s ozhogovymi strikturami pishchevoda.

Results of coloesophagoplasty in 366 patients with long burn strictures of the esophagus are presented. The lesion was total in 74 (21.2%) of them. Inefficacy of bougieurage was indication for plastic surgery in 133 (36.3%) patients, complete obliteration of esophagus--in 53 (14.5%). Left half of the colon was used in 296 (80.9%) cases, transverse colon--in 48 (13.1%), right half of the colon--in 22 (6.0%) cases. Retrosternal shunting esophagoplasty was performed in 247 (67.5%) patients. Complications were in 84 (34.0%), necrosis of the transplant--in 4 (1.6%) patients. Extirpation of the esophagus with posteriormediastinoplasty was performed in 16 (4.4%) patients, in 14 of them--transhiatally. Complications occurred in 7 patients coloesophagopharyngoplasty was carried out in 52 (14.2%) patients with combined stricture of the esophagus and the pharynx, in 23 of them--simultaneously. Complications were in 28 (53.8%) patients. Intrapleural of coloesophagoplasty was performed in 51 patients. General hospital lethality was 3.3%. Long-term results were studied in 259 patients. Good results of esophagoplasty were seen in 135 (52.1%) patients, satisfactory--in 65 (25.1%), unsatisfactory--in 59 (22.8%) patients. Dysfunction of the artificial esophagus was seen in 22.0% patients, 12.7% patients underwent repeated reconstructive surgeries.

[One-stage esophagoplasty with pathologically changed or operated stomach in patients with benign esophageal strictures]. / Odnomomentnaia ézofagoplastika patologicheski izmenennym ili operirovannym zheludkom u bol'nykh s dobrokachestvennymi strikturami pishchevoda.

Results of surgical treatment of 71 patients who have undergone extirpation of the esophagus with one-stage plastic surgery with pathologically changed or operated stomach are presented. All the patients suffered from benign diseases of the esophagus: burn and peptic strictures, peptic esophageal ulcers, cardiospasm of degree IV, benign tumors. Fifty-one patients had been previously operated on the stomach, 10 patients had burn deformation of the stomach, 3--benign tumors of the esophagus involving the stomach, the others--gastric and/or duodenal ulcers. In all the cases an isoperistaltic gastric tube was used for plastic repair of the esophagus. Postoperative lethality was 1.4%.

[Performance of restoration surgeries in postburn stenosis of the esophagus and stomach]. / Vypolnenie vosstanovitel'nykh operatsii pri posleozhogovom stenoze pishchevoda i zheludka.

The thirty-years experience of treatment of 987 patients with postburn stenosis of the gut upper parts was summarized. Of the total amount of restorational operations performed in 431 patients there were: esophagoplasty using colon--in 313 (72.62%), small intestine--in 26 (6.04%), stomach--in 66 (15.32%), segment of colon and ileum on the vascular pedicle--in 10 (2.31%), autotransplantation of jejunal segment--in 2 (0.47%), esophagocardioplasty--in 5 (1.15%), plasty with application of local tissues--in 9 (2.09%). Total mortality had constituted 6.96%, but during last 12 years it had subsided down to 1.91% due to perfection of the operations technique performed, new procedures introduction, the anesthesiological support improvement, wide usage of prophylactic measures for possibly occurring complications.

Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy for benign disease is performed infrequently. We reviewed the Mayo Clinic's experience with patients who required esophageal reconstruction for benign esophageal disease. METHODS: From March 1956 to October 1997, all patients who required resection and reconstruction for a benign condition of the esophagus were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 255 patients (141 male, 114 female). Median age was 55 years (range, 2 to 100). The original diagnosis was an esophageal stricture in 108 patients (42%), primary motility disorder in 84 (33%), perforation in 36 (14%), hiatal hernia in 18 (7%), and other in 9 (4.0%). Reconstruction was with stomach in 168 patients (66%), colon in 70 (27%), and small bowel in 17 (7%). The anastomosis was intrathoracic in 144 patients (57%) and cervical in 111 (43%). There were 13 postoperative deaths (mortality 5%); 142 patients (56%) had at least one complication. Median hospitalization was 14 days (range, 6-95 days). Follow-up was complete in 226 patients (88.6%) for a median of 52 months (range, 1 month to 29 years). A total of 175 patients (77.4%) were improved. Functional results were classified as excellent in 72 patients (31.8%), good in 23 (10.2%), fair in 80 (35.4%), and poor in 51 (22.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease resulted in functional improvement in a majority of patients. It can be done with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Early morbidity is adversely affected by the diagnosis of perforation and the route through which the conduit is placed. Late functional outcome is adversely affected by the diagnosis of paraesophageal hernia and a cervical anastomosis.

Intestinal bypass of the oesophagus: 117 patients in 28 years.

This study includes 117 patients operated upon in the period from 1970 to 1999. Indications, surgical techniques, complications, and results are reviewed. Indications included: long-gap oesophageal atresia with or without fistula in 81 patients; peptic stenosis in 19; caustic stenosis in 12; oesophageal varices in 2; and 1 case each of oesophageal epidermolysis bullosa, total oesophageal leiomyomatosis, and a non-functioning antiperistaltic retrosternal colic graft operated upon in another hospital. A retrosternal bypass was performed 106 times: 98 first operations and 8 redos; the intrathoracic technique was used 19 times. The left transverse colon was used in 107 cases (85.6%), the right transverse colon in 8 (6.4%), and the ileocecum in 10 (8%). All the intestinal bypasses were placed in the isoperistaltic direction. There were 5 deaths in the first 11 years of our experience; no patient died from 1982 on. Ten complications were treated conservatively (8%): 2 wound infections healed with medical treatment, and 8 leaks of the cervical anastomosis closed spontaneously. The major surgical complications were 8 gangrenous bypasses (6.4%), removed and reoperated about 1 year later utilizing an ileocolic retrosternal graft. Three cases of peptic disease of the colic bypass (2.4%) were successfully treated with the author's technique. Nine patients had minor surgical complications (7.2%): 3 strictures of the oesophagocolic anastomosis in a retrosternal bypass (resected and reoperated) and 6 cases of adhesive occlusion. In our opinion, the best substitute of the oesophagus is the colon, particularly the left transverse segment, which may be placed behind the sternum or in the oesophageal bed, always in the isoperistaltic direction. The low mortality (4%), restricted to the early period of our experience, and few major surgical complications (6.4%) are acceptable considering the importance of the operation, and the long-term results may be considered very satisfactory.

[Coloplasty after esophagectomy in cancer. A retrospective study of morbidity and mortality]. / Les coloplasties après oesophagectomie pour cancer. Etude rétrospective de la morbidité et de la mortalité.

Aim of this study has been to evaluate retrospectively morbidity and mortality of 42 colon substitutions after resection for esophageal cancer. Colon substitution was the intervention of first choice in six patients. In the other patients the stomach was useless, because of previous gastric surgery (n = 14), of gastric involvement by the tumor (n = 21) or technical problem (n = 1). Patients have been separated in 2 groups: from 1969 to 1983 (group A, n = 22), and from 1983 to 1997 (group B, n = 20). Mortality and morbidity (all eventful postoperative course) have been collected for the 30 postoperative days. Total morbidity has been 57% as 77% in group A and 35% in group B (p < 0.05). Cervical and colo-colic leak have been the most common complications. Total mortality has been 14% as 22% in group A and 5% in group B (p < 0.1). In group A 3 patients died from anastomosis leak (intrathoracic or intraabdominal) and 2 from medical complications. In group B 1 patient died from unexplained sepsis. Our results show significative decrease of morbidity and mortality in group B. These results can be compared to those of gastroplasty for cancer or coloplasty for benign disease. In cancer of the esophagus, if stomach can not be used as substitutes, colon substitution is the best alternative, which can be used without increase of mortality and morbidity.

[Effects of the association of pulmonary complications and disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome on the viability of esophagogastric transplant in Lewis and Garlock surgical procedures]. / Vliianie na zhiznesposobnost' ézofagogastrotransplantata sochetaniia legochnykh oslozhnenii s sindromom disseminirovannogo vnutrisosudistogo svertyvaniia krovi pri vypolnenii operatsii L'iuisa i Garloka.

The influence of pulmonary complications and disseminated intravascular blood coagulation syndrome combination on esophago-transplant viability was studied while Lewis and Garlock operations conduction. Gastric necrosis have occurred in 7 (6.5%) patients after Lewis and Garlock operations conduction. In 2 of them it was a direct cause of death. Five patients died before gastric wall necrosis have developed on a background respiratory and hemocoagulation disorders occurred. The prophylaxis measures for these complications were proposed.

[The factors affecting patient survival after esophageal resection with single-stage intrathoracic esophagogastroplasty]. / Faktory, vliiaiushchie na vyzhivaemost' bol'nykh posle rezektsii pishchevoda s odnoétapnoi vnutrigrudnoi ézofagogastroplastikoi.

Factors influencing the survival after resection of the esophagus with a one-step intrathoracic esophagogastroplasty were studied in 94 patients. In addition to the standard set of clinical data, under study were the parameters of central hemodynamics and external respiration functions. Risk factors of lethality were found. It was shown that the patient's age did not substantially influence the postoperative survival. Among the absolute contraindications to the one-step operation on the esophagus is the decompensation of cardiorespiratory functions and cachexia. The investigation of factors of risk of postoperative complications considered in groups allowed to pass to purposeful prophylactics of most probable of them.