Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. argent. microbiol ; Rev. argent. microbiol;52(3): 81-90, Sept. 2020. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1340907

RESUMO

Abstract This study was undertaken to investígate the resistance phenotypes to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSb) antibiotics and their associated genotypes in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. We analyzed one hundred, consecutive, non-duplicate isolates (methicillin-susceptible MSSA, n = 53 and methicillin-resistant MRSA, n =47) obtained from var-ious clinical samples between July 2012 to December 2013. The resistance profile to MLSb antibiotics was determined by phenotypic methods and the resistance genes were detected by PCR assays. All of the isolates were subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (SmaI-PFGE). The overall prevalence of resistance to MLSb antibiotics was 38% and the resistance phenotype distribution was as follows: cMLSb, 22%; iMLSB, 10%; MSb, 5% and L, 1%. We detected ermA, ermC, ermB and mrsA/B genes in these resistant isolates. The single ermA gene was commonly observed mainly in those with a cMLSb R phenotype, whereas the combination ermA and ermC was more commonly observed in isolates with inducible expression. The patterns of SmaI-PFGE suggest a great genetic diversity in both MRSA and MSSA resistant to MLSb antibiotics. The results demonstrate the local presence of S. aureus resistant to MLSb antibiotics and its most frequently described responsible genes. Some of these isolates, especially those with the iMLSB phenotype, may be associated with therapeutic failure. Therefore, efforts should be directed to the correct detection of all MLSb resistant isolates using appropriate laboratory tests. PFGE results reveal a wide spread of resistance genes rather than the circulation of S. aureus clones resistant to MLSb antibiotics.


Resumen Los objetivos de este estudio fueron investigar en Staphylococcus aureus la presencia de fenotipos resistentes a los antibióticos macrólidos, lincosamidas y estreptograminas tipoB (MLSb) y conocer sus genotipos responsables. Analizamos 100 aislamientos consecutivos, no duplicados (53 sensibles a meticilina [MSSA] y 47 resistentes a meticilina [MRSA]), obtenidos entre 2012 y 2013 a partir de diferentes muestras clínicas. El perfil de resistencia a los antibióticos MLSb fue determinado por métodos fenotípicos y los genes de resistencia se detectaron por PCR. Todos los aislamientos fueron comparados por SmaI-PFGE. La prevalencia global de resistencia a los antibióticos MLSB fue del 38% y la distribución de los fenotipos de resistencia fue la siguiente: cMLSB, 22%; iMLSB, 10%; MSB, 5%; L, 1%. Se detectaron los genes ermA, ermC y mrsA/B en los aislamientos resistentes. El gen ermA se observó, sobre todo, en aislamientos con fenotipo resistente constitutivo R (cMLSB), mientras que la combinación ermA y ermC se detectó principalmente en aislamientos con resistencia inducible (iMLSB). Los patrones de Smal-PFGE sugieren una gran diversidad genética en los aislamientos resistentes a los antibióticos MLSb, tanto MRSA como MSSA. Los resultados demuestran la presencia local de S. aureus resistentes a los antibióticos MLSB y de sus genes responsables más frecuentemente descritos. Estos cultivos, especialmente aquellos con fenotipo resistente iMLSB, pueden asociarse con fallas terapéuticas. Por lo tanto, los esfuerzos deben dirigirse a la correcta detección de todos los cultivos resistentes a MLSB utilizando pruebas de laboratorio adecuadas. Los resultados de Smal-PFGE sugieren una amplia diseminación de genes de resistencia, más que la circulación de clones resistentes a los antibióticos MLSB.


Assuntos
Humanos , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Fenótipo , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Uruguai , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Macrolídeos/farmacologia , Estreptogramina B/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Lincosamidas/farmacologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Genótipo , Hospitais Públicos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia
2.
Rev Argent Microbiol ; 52(3): 202-210, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31928835

RESUMO

This study was undertaken to investigate the resistance phenotypes to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) antibiotics and their associated genotypes in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. We analyzed one hundred, consecutive, non-duplicate isolates (methicillin-susceptible MSSA, n=53 and methicillin-resistant MRSA, n=47) obtained from various clinical samples between July 2012 to December 2013. The resistance profile to MLSB antibiotics was determined by phenotypic methods and the resistance genes were detected by PCR assays. All of the isolates were subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (SmaI-PFGE). The overall prevalence of resistance to MLSB antibiotics was 38% and the resistance phenotype distribution was as follows: cMLSB, 22%; iMLSB, 10%; MSB, 5% and L, 1%. We detected ermA, ermC, ermB and mrsA/B genes in these resistant isolates. The single ermA gene was commonly observed mainly in those with a cMLSB R phenotype, whereas the combination ermA and ermC was more commonly observed in isolates with inducible expression. The patterns of SmaI-PFGE suggest a great genetic diversity in both MRSA and MSSA resistant to MLSB antibiotics. The results demonstrate the local presence of S. aureus resistant to MLSB antibiotics and its most frequently described responsible genes. Some of these isolates, especially those with the iMLSB phenotype, may be associated with therapeutic failure. Therefore, efforts should be directed to the correct detection of all MLSB resistant isolates using appropriate laboratory tests. PFGE results reveal a wide spread of resistance genes rather than the circulation of S. aureus clones resistant to MLSB antibiotics.


Assuntos
Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Genótipo , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Lincosamidas/farmacologia , Macrolídeos/farmacologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Fenótipo , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Estreptogramina B/farmacologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Uruguai
3.
An Acad Bras Cienc ; 88(3): 1501-9, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27556226

RESUMO

Staphylococcus aureus can cause a variety of infections due to its high transmissibility, high pathogenic potential and resistance to multiple drugs, factors that contribute to the relevance of infections in healthcare services. The aim of this study was to document phenotypic and genotypic resistance factors of Staphylococcus aureus strains, isolated from nasal mucosa of medical students. A nasal swab was collected from the nares (nostrils) of 222 medical students. After collection, the samples were submitted to isolation and identification procedures. From 204 valid samples, 20.6% (42 samples) were positive for S. aureus. For the assessment of phenotypic resistance by disk-diffusion technique, from 42 samples, 95.2% showed resistance to erythromycin, 42.8% to clindamycin, 16.6% to cephoxitin and 9.5% to oxacillin. The D test showed that 26.2% of samples were resistant to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin B. A PCR assay allowed for the evaluation of a genotypic resistance profile, in which 16.6% of the samples were positive for the mecA gene, 35.7% positive for the ermC gene or ermA gene and 28.5% were positive for both genes. These results demonstrate that medical students can enter the healthcare service previously colonized by multidrug resistant strains and become potential spreaders in the hospital environment.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Nariz/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Estudantes de Medicina , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Humanos , Lincosamidas/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Estreptogramina B/farmacologia
4.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; Braz. j. infect. dis;20(3): 276-281, May.-June 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-789481

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction There is a mechanism of macrolide resistance in Staphylococcus spp. which also affects the lincosamides and type B streptogramins characterizing the so-called MLSB resistance, whose expression can be constitutive (cMLSB) or inducible (iMLSB) and is encoded mainly by ermA and ermC genes. The cMLSB resistance is easily detected by susceptibility testing used in the laboratory routine, but iMLSB resistance is not. Therapy with clindamycin in cases of infection with isolated iMLSB resistance may fail. Objective To characterize the phenotypic (occurrence of cMLSB and iMLSB phenotypes) and molecular (occurrence of ermA and ermC genes) profiles of MLSB resistance of clinical isolates of susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and CNS (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus) from patients of a university hospital, in Pernambuco. Methods The antimicrobial susceptibility of 103 isolates was determined by the disk diffusion technique in Mueller–Hinton agar followed by oxacillin screening. The iMLSB phenotype was detected by D test. Isolates with cMLSB and iMLSB phenotypes were subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of ermA and ermC genes. Results The cMLSB and iMLSB phenotypes were respectively identified in 39 (37.9%) and five (4.9%) isolates. The iMLSB phenotype was found only in four (10.8%) methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and one (4.5%) methicillin-resistant S. aureus. In the 44 isolates subjected to PCR, four (9.1%) only ermA gene was detected, a lower frequency when compared to only ermC 17 (38.6%) gene and to one (2.3%) isolate presenting both genes. Conclusion In the Staphylococcus spp. analyzed, the ermC gene was found more often than the ermA, although the iMLSB phenotype had been less frequent than the cMLSB. It was important to perform the D test for its detection to guide therapeutic approaches.


Assuntos
Humanos , Staphylococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus/genética , Macrolídeos/farmacologia , Estreptogramina B/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Lincosamidas/farmacologia , Fenótipo , Brasil , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Genes Bacterianos/genética , Hospitais Universitários
5.
Microb Drug Resist ; 22(8): 700-706, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27045297

RESUMO

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying SCCmec type IV has emerged in hospitals worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate phenotypic and molecular characteristics of antimicrobial resistance in MRSA SCCmec IV isolates, presenting different genetic backgrounds, isolated from hospitals in Rio de Janeiro. The antimicrobial resistance of 128 S. aureus type IV isolates from 11 hospitals was characterized by the disk diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test. Mutations in parC gene, which encodes ciprofloxacin resistance, and genes associated with macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSb) resistance were also investigated. MRSA isolates belonging to USA400/ST1 (60 isolates), USA800/ST5 (40), USA1100/ST30 (13), and other 11 (15) lineages were mainly resistant to erythromycin (68%), ciprofloxacin (56%), and clindamycin (50%). The highest antimicrobial resistance rates were found among USA400 isolates (p < 0.05). The majority of them (90%) carried only the erm(C) gene and mainly presented two mutation types in the parC gene. The msr(A) gene was most frequently found among USA800 isolates (p < 0.05). Among MRSA type IV isolates from Rio de Janeiro hospitals, multiresistance, including mutations in parC gene, was associated to the USA400/ST1, while the msr(A) gene was associated with USA800/ST5 isolates, highlighting that these lineages could have more potential to persist in a hospital environment.


Assuntos
DNA Topoisomerase IV/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Regulação Bacteriana da Expressão Gênica , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Metionina Sulfóxido Redutases/genética , Metiltransferases/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Brasil/epidemiologia , DNA Topoisomerase IV/metabolismo , Hospitais , Humanos , Lincosamidas/farmacologia , Macrolídeos/farmacologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Metionina Sulfóxido Redutases/metabolismo , Metiltransferases/metabolismo , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Epidemiologia Molecular , Mutação , Quinolonas/farmacologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Estreptogramina B/farmacologia
6.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 20(3): 276-81, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27094233

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is a mechanism of macrolide resistance in Staphylococcus spp. which also affects the lincosamides and type B streptogramins characterizing the so-called MLSB resistance, whose expression can be constitutive (cMLSB) or inducible (iMLSB) and is encoded mainly by ermA and ermC genes. The cMLSB resistance is easily detected by susceptibility testing used in the laboratory routine, but iMLSB resistance is not. Therapy with clindamycin in cases of infection with isolated iMLSB resistance may fail. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the phenotypic (occurrence of cMLSB and iMLSB phenotypes) and molecular (occurrence of ermA and ermC genes) profiles of MLSB resistance of clinical isolates of susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and CNS (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus) from patients of a university hospital, in Pernambuco. METHODS: The antimicrobial susceptibility of 103 isolates was determined by the disk diffusion technique in Mueller-Hinton agar followed by oxacillin screening. The iMLSB phenotype was detected by D test. Isolates with cMLSB and iMLSB phenotypes were subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of ermA and ermC genes. RESULTS: The cMLSB and iMLSB phenotypes were respectively identified in 39 (37.9%) and five (4.9%) isolates. The iMLSB phenotype was found only in four (10.8%) methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and one (4.5%) methicillin-resistant S. aureus. In the 44 isolates subjected to PCR, four (9.1%) only ermA gene was detected, a lower frequency when compared to only ermC 17 (38.6%) gene and to one (2.3%) isolate presenting both genes. CONCLUSION: In the Staphylococcus spp. analyzed, the ermC gene was found more often than the ermA, although the iMLSB phenotype had been less frequent than the cMLSB. It was important to perform the D test for its detection to guide therapeutic approaches.


Assuntos
Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Lincosamidas/farmacologia , Macrolídeos/farmacologia , Staphylococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus/genética , Estreptogramina B/farmacologia , Brasil , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/efeitos dos fármacos , Genes Bacterianos/genética , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Fenótipo
7.
Microbiol Immunol ; 56(9): 647-50, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22672011

RESUMO

This work characterizes MLS(b) resistance in 39 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and 32 Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) isolates. Of 21 erm(A) gene encoding MRSA isolates, 71.4% carried SCCmecIII, whereas of 12 isolates carrying the erm(C) gene, 83.3% carried SCCmecIV. Among the 25 MRSE isolates positive for the erm(C) gene, 80% had SCCmecIV or nontypeable cassettes. Isolates carrying these genes had MIC(90) ≥ 256 µg/mL to erythromycin and clindamycin. The msr(A) gene was associated with a low MIC(90) to these drugs. The erm(A) gene was associated with SCCmecIII in MRSA isolates, whereas the erm(C) gene was associated with SCCmecIV in both MRSA and MRSE isolates.


Assuntos
Clindamicina/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Eritromicina/farmacologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efeitos dos fármacos , Estreptogramina B/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Brasil/epidemiologia , Cromossomos Bacterianos/genética , Genes Bacterianos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Metiltransferases/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Proteínas de Ligação às Penicilinas , Fenótipo , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus epidermidis/genética , Staphylococcus epidermidis/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA