Cytarabine-Induced Corneal Toxicity: Clinical Features and Relief of Symptoms with Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% in Two Patients

We report two patients who developed toxic keratopathy following high-dose cytarabine chemotherapy and whose symptoms resolved following topical loteprednol etabonate 0.5% treatment. A 25-year-old woman and a 26-year-old man with acute myeloid leukemia were referred to our department with symptoms of ocular discomfort, photophobia, and blurred vision after consolidation chemotherapy. Central corneal epithelial microcysts were observed bilaterally in both patients, and in vivo confocal microscopy showed highly reflective disseminated granular and irregular intraepithelial opacities, mainly in the basal epithelial layers. Loteprednol etabonate 0.5% relieved both patients' symptoms in less than a week, and the microcysts disappeared in 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. Although there is no standardized treatment protocol for cytarabine-induced corneal toxicity, dexamethasone 0.1% and prednisolone phosphate 1.0% were reported to be effective in the resolution of discomfort and symptoms. In the two patients we report herein, loteprednol etabonate 0.5% four times daily was also effective in suppressing the symptoms.

Safety of KPI-121 Ophthalmic Suspension 0.25% in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Multicenter, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Studies.

PURPOSE: The safety of KPI-121 0.25%, an ophthalmic nanoparticle suspension of loteprednol etabonate, was evaluated in subjects with dry eye disease (DED) in one phase 2 and three phase 3 randomized trials of similar design. METHODS: Adults with DED received KPI-121 0.25% or vehicle drops 4 times daily (QID) for ≥2 weeks; 1430 subjects received KPI-121 0.25% and 1438 subjects received vehicle drops. Main safety assessments were adverse events (AEs) and intraocular pressure (IOP). As a common side effect associated with the use of ocular corticosteroids is elevated IOP, subjects with a history of or current diagnosis of glaucoma were excluded. RESULTS: Instillation site pain was the most common AE, reported by 5.2% of subjects in the KPI-121 0.25% group and 4.4% of subjects in the vehicle group; other AEs were reported by ≤0.8% of subjects in the KPI-121 group. IOP elevations, a side effect associated with the use of ophthalmic corticosteroids, were observed with low incidence: 0.6% and 0.2% of subjects in the KPI-121 and vehicle groups, respectively. An IOP elevation was defined as an increase from baseline of >5 mm Hg that resulted in an IOP of ≥21 mm Hg in either eye during use of the study product. CONCLUSIONS: KPI-121 ophthalmic suspension 0.25% seemed to be safe and well tolerated when dosed QID for 2 to 4 weeks in those DED subjects included in the 4 trials.

Loteprednol Etabonate for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease.

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular condition that can impair vision and may adversely impact quality of life. Due to the inflammatory nature of this disorder, topical corticosteroids are an effective treatment option, particularly for moderate-to-severe DED when first-line treatments, such as ocular lubricants, are insufficient. Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a retrometabolically designed corticosteroid with a low propensity to cause corticosteroid-related adverse effects, such as elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). This review was conducted to provide an assessment of published studies on the use of LE for treatment of inflammation associated with DED. Twelve prospective and 2 retrospective studies evaluating LE ophthalmic suspension 0.5% and 2 prospective studies evaluating LE ophthalmic gel 0.5% were identified. LE given as monotherapy or with artificial tears (AT) improved signs of DED, especially among patients with a more pronounced inflammatory component, and also improved DED symptoms compared to baseline and/or control. Treatment with LE before cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy reduced stinging upon CsA initiation and provided more rapid relief of DED signs and symptoms than CsA plus AT alone. In patients with meibomian gland dysfunction, LE alone, or in addition to eyelid scrubs/warm compresses, reduced clinical signs and symptoms, and tear proinflammatory cytokine levels. Overall, LE was safe and well tolerated, with minimal effects on IOP. While larger and longer-term studies are warranted, these data support the use of LE as a safe and effective treatment option for DED.

Physicochemical attributes of white petrolatum from various sources used for ophthalmic ointment formulations.

Excipients from different sources may lead to significant differences in the performance of drug products, posing challenges in product quality control. A previous report showed that the drug release rates from ophthalmic ointments were affected by source variation of white petrolatum. To understand the physicochemical properties including the microstructure of white petrolatum and the impact of this on the performance of finished products, the following were investigated: rheological properties, thermal analysis (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)), as well as structural characteristics (polarized light microscopy (PLM), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS)). The rheological parameters may be indicative of the drug release rate of the finished ophthalmic ointments when using a process involving hot-melting with immediate cooling. The white petrolatum from the four different sources also showed different thermal behavior. According to SAXS and WAXS, all of the petrolatum showed semi-crystalline behavior with different extents of crystallinity (from 9.5% to 16.9%). The crystalline domains of the petrolatum are ordered in an orthorhombic structure forming lamellar sheets with a periodicity from 9.1 nm to 9.9 nm. An in-depth understanding of the semi-crystalline structure was obtained and it provided valuable information for formulation optimization and characterization of petrolatum-based products.

Loteprednol Etabonate (Submicron) Ophthalmic Gel 0.38%: A Review in Post-Operative Inflammation and Pain Following Ocular Surgery.

Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.38% (Lotemax® SM; hereafter referred to as loteprednol etabonate gel 0.38%) is a topical ophthalmic corticosteroid approved in the USA for the treatment of post-operative inflammation and pain following ocular surgery. This formulation provides improved drug delivery compared with loteprednol etabonate micronized gel 0.5%, with a smaller drug particle size (in the submicron range) to improve dissolution and penetration into ocular tissues, meaning less loteprednol etabonate is required to exert therapeutic effect. In two multicentre, randomized phase III trials, significantly more loteprednol etabonate gel 0.38% than vehicle recipients displayed complete resolution of ocular inflammation and ocular pain at day 8 post cataract surgery. Complete resolution of pain was seen as early as post-operative day 3. Treatment-related ocular adverse events in the loteprednol etabonate gel 0.38% group occurred in < 1% of subjects and included one incidence each of photophobia, cystoid macular oedema, eyelid oedema and instillation site pain. Treatment with loteprednol etabonate gel 0.38% had no meaningful impact on intraocular pressure (IOP) or visual acuity. Thus, loteprednol etabonate gel 0.38% extends the treatment options available in resolving post-operative inflammation and pain in patients who have undergone ocular surgery.

Innovations in topical ocular corticosteroid therapy for the management of postoperative ocular inflammation and pain.

Topical ophthalmic corticosteroids are of clinical benefit in the management of pain and inflammation after ocular surgery; however, their use can be associated with class-associated adverse events (AEs) and limited bioavailability. Selection of an appropriate topical corticosteroid depends on drug-specific variables such as AE profile, efficacy, potency, dosing, patient-specific administration needs, and formulation properties aimed at minimizing precorneal drug loss, increasing ocular surface drug residence time, and maximizing drug delivery to the anterior tissues. Recently, strategies for improving ocular penetration of ophthalmic formulations have included use of mucoadhesive formulations (ie, polycarbophil-containing gels) and drug particle size reduction, enabling faster drug dissolution and therefore increased bioavailability and penetration. Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a carbon-20 ester corticosteroid developed through retrometabolic drug design with potent anti-inflammatory effects and a reduced propensity for eliciting corticosteroid class AEs. This drug has been formulated for topical ophthalmic use after surgery as 0.5% and 1% suspensions, a 0.5% ointment, and a 0.5% gel. Preclinical and clinical data for a new 0.38% LE gel will be reviewed demonstrating that reducing the drug particle size to the nanometer range in diameter provides effective ocular tissue penetration and resolution of pain and inflammation despite a reduced drug concentration (0.38%) and dosing frequency.

Comparison of 2 regimens of loteprednol etabonate and bromfenac for cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 2 dosing regimens of loteprednol etabonate (LE) ophthalmic gel 0.5% and bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% in patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. DESIGN: Six-week prospective, masked, randomized controlled noninferiority study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eyes. METHODS: Patients undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery were selected in a consecutive manner. Patients were randomized to one of 2 groups: LE QID + qD bromfenac (control group) versus LE BID + qD bromfenac (study group). Primary outcome metrics included summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS) and adverse events. Secondary outcome measures included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, central retinal thickness, and subjective symptomology scores measured at 4 study visits. The final visit included a questionnaire addressing compliance, satisfaction, and comfort with the medications. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety between dosing regimens. No statistically significant difference was reported between groups regarding SOIS (visit 1 p = N/A, visit 2 p = 0.66, visit 3 p = 0.60, visit 4 p = 0.08). No adverse events were reported relating to the difference in study regimen. A statistically significant difference was not found regarding secondary outcomes (p > 0.05). Control group patients reported a more difficult time remembering their doses for bromfenac but not LE (bromfenac p < 0.05; LE p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that both groups had similar outcomes with respect to control of ocular inflammation with no differences in adverse outcomes. The compliance questionnaire also suggests a patient preference for the dosing regimen with lower frequency of drop application.

Rheological Properties, Dissolution Kinetics, and Ocular Pharmacokinetics of Loteprednol Etabonate (Submicron) Ophthalmic Gel 0.38.

Purpose: To evaluate rheological properties, in vitro dissolution, and in vivo ocular pharmacokinetics of loteprednol etabonate (LE) (submicron) ophthalmic gel 0.38%. Methods: The viscosity of the LE gel 0.38% formulation was measured with a controlled stress rheometer. Dissolution kinetics were evaluated in a fixed-volume and flow-through assay. Rabbits received a single instillation of LE (submicron) gel 0.38% (both eyes), and concentrations of LE in ocular tissues were determined through 24 h by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Where indicated, comparators included micronized LE gel 0.38%, 0.5% (Lotemax® gel), and 0.75%. Results: LE (submicron) gel 0.38% exhibited shear-thinning characteristics similar to LE gel 0.5% with nearly identical yield stress. LE (submicron) gel 0.38% released 2.6-fold more LE into the dissolution medium than micronized LE gel 0.5% over 30 s in the fixed-volume dissolution assay, and submicron LE attained higher concentrations of dissolved LE than micronized LE gel 0.38% in the flow-through dissolution assay. In rabbits, the maximal concentration and area-under-the-curve over 24 h for LE in aqueous humor were 2.5- and 1.8-fold higher, respectively, for LE (submicron) gel 0.38% versus micronized LE gel 0.5% (both P < 0.001). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for most other tissues. Conclusions: LE (submicron) gel 0.38% demonstrated similar rheological properties to micronized LE gel 0.5% but faster dissolution, thus providing similar or higher LE concentrations in the aqueous humor, cornea, and iris-ciliary body after ocular dosing in rabbits despite a lowered concentration of drug in the formulation.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% and Topical Dexamethasone 1% in Post-Vitrectomy Inflammation.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of postoperative topical loteprednol etabonate (LE) 0.5% with dexamethasone (DEX) 0.1% for the treatment of inflammation following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). METHODS: A total of 150 eyes of 150 patients who underwent transconjunctival PPV for various diagnoses were included in this prospective, randomized study. The patients were assigned into two groups as Group LE (n = 75) and Group DEX (n = 75). Intraocular inflammation, intraocular pressure (IOP), and the intensity of postoperative pain were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean IOP was higher in the patients treated with DEX (p > 0.05). The need for anti-glaucoma medications was significantly lower in Group LE (5.3%) than in Group DEX (17.3%) (p = 0.020). Tyndall scores were less in Group DEX at postoperative Days 1 (p = 0.01) and 3 (p = 0.017). On Day 1, it was more likely for patients to have mild or moderate pain in Group LE (p < 0.001). On Day 3, the number of the patients with no pain was higher in Group DEX (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Although DEX is more effective in the early postoperative days, LE appears to be as effective in controlling inflammatory response following PPV in the long-term. Topical LE is associated with less increase in the IOP and a lower need for anti-glaucoma medications.

Efficacy and Safety of Loteprednol 0.5% and Fluorometholone 0.1% After Strabismus Surgery in Children.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of topical loteprednol and fluorometholone in children who underwent strabismus surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational case series. A total of 60 Korean children who underwent strabismus surgery between January 2016 and September 2016 were included. Patients were prescribed topical loteprednol etabonate 0.5% or fluorometholone 0.1% until 3 weeks after surgery. Four parameters (intraocular pressure [IOP], conjunctival injection, conjunctival inflammation, and patient discomfort) were assessed every week for up to 4 weeks after surgery. Main outcome measures were comparison of parameters between the 2 groups at each following week after surgery. In addition, factors associated with clinically meaningful IOP elevation were evaluated. RESULTS: IOP was significantly elevated at the second and third postoperative week compared with baseline (P = 0.028 and 0.001) in the loteprednol group but not significantly in the fluorometholone group. The mean IOP of the loteprednol group at 1 and 3 weeks after surgery were significantly higher than that of the fluorometholone group (P = 0.032 and 0.017, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≤8 years (odds ratio 14.52, 95% confidence interval 1.16-139.05) was associated with IOP >21 mmHg. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in patient discomfort, conjunctival inflammation, and conjunctival injection. CONCLUSIONS: Loteprednol and fluorometholone showed similar anti-inflammatory effect after strabismus surgery in children. Loteprednol appeared to have more effect on IOP elevation than fluorometholone, especially in children ≤8 years of age. When treating young patients with loteprednol, clinicians should be aware of IOP elevation.

Reduced Efficacy of Low-dose Topical Steroids in Dry Eye Disease Associated With Graft-versus-Host Disease.

PURPOSE: To compare the response of dry eye disease (DED) to treatment with topical steroid in patients with and without graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a double-masked, randomized clinical trial. METHODS: This single-center study included 42 patients with moderate-to-severe DED associated with (n = 21) or without (n = 21) chronic GVHD. In each group, patients received either loteprednol etabonate 0.5% ophthalmic suspension or artificial tears twice daily for 4 weeks. Clinical data, including Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), conjunctival lissamine green staining, tear break-up time (TBUT), and Schirmer test, were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in signs and symptoms of DED between the groups at baseline. In non-GVHD patients receiving loteprednol treatment, the average OSDI score decreased by 34% from 49.5 ± 5.9 to 32.6 ± 4.8 (mean ± standard error of the mean, P = .001) and the average CFS score decreased by 41% from 5.6 ± 0.6 to 3.3 ± 0.9 (P = .02). On the other hand, loteprednol treatment in GVHD patients resulted in minimal change in OSDI (59.2 ± 6.7 to 61.1 ± 7.1, 3% increase, P = .66) and CFS (5.5 ± 0.5 to 5.3 ± 1.1, 4% decrease, P = .85) scores. Treatment with artificial tears resulted in 22% decrease of OSDI (P = .10) and 32% decrease of CFS (P = .02) scores in non-GVHD patients, and had minimal effect in patients with GVHD. CONCLUSIONS: DED patients with ocular GVHD have a less favorable response to a low-dose topical steroid regimen compared with those without ocular GVHD even with similar baseline disease severity.

In vitro and ex vivo correlation of drug release from ophthalmic ointments.

In vitro drug release testing and ex vivo transcorneal drug permeation can provide valuable information on the performance of the Q1/Q2 equivalent ointments prior to any animal studies. Good correlation between in vitro and ex vivo drug release may be indicative of good in vitro and in vivo correlation. Accordingly, it is important to investigate in vitro as well as ex vivo drug release from Q1/Q2 equivalent ophthalmic ointments and evaluate whether a correlation between these release profiles can be established. Four Q1/Q2 equivalent loteprednol etabonate ointments were prepared using different processing methods and excipient sources. The rheological parameters (crossover modulus and K value) of the four formulations were determined. The in vitro drug release testing of the four ointment formulations were performed using three different apparati (Franz diffusion cells, USP apparatus 2 with enhancer cells and USP apparatus 4 with semisolid adapters). Three models (zero order, logarithmic and the Higuchi model) were used to study the release kinetics of the ointment formulations. The transcorneal (rabbit corneas) permeation studies were performed using spherical joint Franz diffusion cells. The USP apparatus 4 method demonstrated better discriminatory ability compared to the USP apparatus 2 and the Franz diffusion cell methods. The in vitro release profiles of the four Q1/Q2 equivalent ointments with manufacturing differences showed a better fit using the Higuchi model (R2 > 0.98) for all three release testing methods, compared to the other two models. Ex vivo drug release through the rabbit corneas displayed zero order release kinetics. A logarithmic correlation between rheological parameters (crossover and K value) and transcorneal flux were established. In addition, a plot of the in vitro release rate against the ex vivo release flux of the four ointment formulations, yielded a straight line (R2 > 0.98) for all three release methods. Accordingly, the rheological parameters may be useful in predicting in vitro as well as ex vivo release properties.

Effect of topical loteprednol etabonate with lid hygiene on tear cytokines and meibomian gland dysfunction in prosthetic eye wearers.

PurposeTo assess tear cytokine levels and clinical outcomes in meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in the blind eye of patients wearing an ocular prosthesis after 2 months of treatment with topical loteprednol etabonate and eyelid scrubs with warm compresses.Patients and methodsThis study included patients with MGD wearing a unilateral ocular prosthesis for more than 1 year. All patients topically received 0.5% loteprednol etabonate and were instructed to scrub their eyelids with warm compresses on the prosthetic eye for 2 months. We evaluated tear cytokine levels using Multiplex Bead Immunoassays, performed biomicroscopic examination of the lid margins and meibomian gland, conducted meibography imaging, and assessed MGD-related ocular symptoms using a questionnaire for the prosthetic eye before and 2 months after treatment.ResultsThirty consecutive patients were included. There were significant reductions in the levels of interleukin (IL)-6, interferon-γ, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, and IL-1ß (P<0.001 for each cytokine). Moreover, there were improvements in ocular symptoms (P=0.001), lid margin abnormalities (P<0.001), meibomian gland expressibility (P<0.001) and meibography findings (P=0.037).ConclusionTopical loteprednol etabonate in conjunction with eyelid scrubs and warm compresses were effective in treating MGD in prosthetic eye wearers. Furthermore, tear cytokine measurements may serve as an additional approach for evaluating the efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatment for MGD in prosthetic eye wearers.

Topical treatments for blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in children.

BACKGROUND: Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (BKC) is a type of inflammation of the surface of the eye and eyelids that involves changes of the eyelids, dysfunction of the meibomian glands, and inflammation of the conjunctiva and cornea. Chronic inflammation of the cornea can lead to scarring, vascularisation and opacity. BKC in children can cause significant symptoms including irritation, watering, photophobia and loss of vision from corneal opacity, refractive error or amblyopia.Treatment of BKC is directed towards modification of meibomian gland disease and the bacterial flora of lid margin and conjunctiva, and control of ocular surface inflammation. Although both topical and systemic treatments are used to treat people with BKC, this Cochrane review focuses on topical treatments. OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare data on the efficacy and safety of topical treatments (including antibiotics, steroids, immunosuppressants and lubricants), alone or in combination, for BKC in children from birth to 16 years. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2016, Issue 6), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE ( January 1946 to 11 July 2016), Embase (January 1980 to 11 July 2016), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 11 July 2016. We searched the reference lists of identified reports and the Science Citation Index to identify any additional reports of studies that met the inclusion criteria. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials that involved topical treatments in children up to 16 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of BKC. We planned to include studies that evaluated a single topical medication versus placebo, a combination of treatments versus placebo, and those that compared two or multiple active treatments. We planned to include studies in which participants received additional treatments, such as oral antibiotics, oral anti-inflammatories, warm lid compresses and lid margin cleaning. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened the results of the literature search (titles and abstracts) to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria of the review and applied standards as expected for Cochrane reviews. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included one study from the USA that met the inclusion criteria. In the study, 137 children aged zero to six years old with blepharoconjunctivitis were randomised to treatment in one of four trial arms (loteprednol etabonate/tobramycin combination, loteprednol etabonate alone, tobramycin alone or placebo) for 15 days, with assessments on days 1, 3, 7 and 15. We judged the study to be at high risk of attrition bias and bias due to selective outcome reporting. The study did not report the number of children with improvement in symptoms nor with total or partial success as measured by changes in clinical symptoms.All children showed a reduction in blepharoconjunctivitis grade score, but there was no evidence of important differences between groups. Visual acuity was not fully reported but the authors stated that there was no change in visual acuity in any of the treatment groups. The study reported ocular and non ocular adverse events but was underpowered to detect differences between the groups. Ocular adverse events were as follows: loteprednol/tobramycin 1/34 (eye pain); loteprednol 4/35 (eye pain, conjunctivitis, eye discharge, eye inflammation); tobramycin 0/34; placebo (vehicle) 0/34. The evidence was limited for all these outcomes and we judged it to be very low certainty.There was no information on clinical signs (aside from grade score), disease progression or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no high-quality evidence of the safety and efficacy of topical treatments for BKC, which resulted in uncertainty about the indications and effectiveness of topical treatment. Clinical trials are required to test efficacy and safety of current and any future treatments. Outcome measures need to be developed which can capture both objective clinical and patient-reported aspects of the condition and treatments.

Dose Uniformity of Topical Corticosteroids: A Simulated Trial of Fluorometholone Acetate 0.1% and Loteprednol Etabonate Gel 0.5.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the concentrations of Flarex® and Lotemax® when shaken and not shaken. Many patients fail to shake or inappropriately shake suspensions of corticosteroids before instillation as directed. This study was designed to help determine what concentration of corticosteroid these patients are receiving. In addition, independent confirmation of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel dose uniformity was determined and compared as a possible alternative. METHODS: Drug concentrations of shaken versus unshaken Flarex and Lotemax were determined over a 20-day simulated tapered course in our institutional laboratory. Collected samples were analyzed by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection at 240 nm. RESULTS: Flarex had a mean concentration of 93.7% of the declared concentration when shaken and 7.25% when not shaken. The difference between these groups was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Lotemax had a mean concentration of 96.74% of the declared concentration when shaken and a mean concentration of 98.97% when not shaken. The difference between these groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.194). CONCLUSIONS: Flarex maintains dose uniformity when shaken. When not shaken, it has poor dose uniformity. Lotemax was consistent whether shaken or not in our study and can be considered to eliminate the variability of poor patient compliance with shaking. The manufacturers of both drugs recommend shaking before application.

Development of loteprednol etabonate-loaded cationic nanoemulsified in-situ ophthalmic gel for sustained delivery and enhanced ocular bioavailability.

A novel cationic nanoemulsified in-situ ophthalmic gel of loteprednol etabonate (LE) was developed to improve the permeability and retention time of formulations for overall improvement of drug's ocular bioavability. Capryol 90 (oil phase), tween 80 (surfactant) and transcutol P (cosurfactant) was selected as formulation excipients to construct pseudoternary phase diagrams and nanoemulsion region was recognized from diagrams. Spontaneous emulsification method was used to manufacture LE nanoemulsion and it was optimized using 32 factorial design by considering the amount of oil and the ratio of surfactant to cosurfactant (Smix) as independent variables and evaluated for various physicochemical properties. Optimized NE was dispersed in Poloxamer 407 and 188 solution to form nanoemulsified sols that were predictable to transform into in-situ gels at corneal temperature. Drug pharmacokinetics of sterilized optimized in situ NE gel, NE-ISG2 [0.69% w/w Capryol 90, 0.99%w/w Smix (3:1), 13% Poloxamer 407, 4% w/w Poloxamer 188] and marketed formulation were assessed in rabbit aqueous humor. The in-situ gels were clear, shear thinning in nature and displayed zero-order drug release kinetics. NE-ISG2 showed the minimum ocular irritation potential and significantly (p < 0.01) higher Cmax and AUC(0-10 h), delayed Tmax, extended mean residence time and improved (2.54-fold times) bioavailability compared to marketed formulation.

Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Risk of Immunologic Rejection Episodes after Discontinuing Topical Corticosteroids.

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of immunologic rejection episodes if topical corticosteroids are discontinued 1 year after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) compared with continued once-per-day use. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, parallel-group study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 400 eyes of 259 DMEK recipients, aged 23 to 90 years. METHODS: Patients were enrolled 1 year after DMEK and allowed to choose whether to stop or continue once-daily topical corticosteroids to maximize compliance. Fellow eyes were eligible for enrollment because the donor grafts were independent. Participants were examined at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months during the second year after DMEK. Results were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of immunologic rejection episodes. RESULTS: Steroids were discontinued in 277 eyes (no steroid group) and continued once per day in 123 eyes (steroid group). The subject demographics were well balanced across groups; 99% of the subjects were white, and 95% of the grafts were performed to treat Fuchs' dystrophy. The cumulative incidence of rejection episodes was significantly greater in the no steroid group (6% vs. 0% in the steroid group; P = 0.013). Thirteen of 14 rejection episodes (all in the no steroid group) resolved with resumption of topical corticosteroids. Overall, 1 of 277 grafts (0.4%) failed in the no steroid group, and none failed in the steroid group during the second year after DMEK (P = 0.49). The endothelial cell loss between 1 and 2 years was comparable in the no steroid and steroid groups (6.4%±12% vs. 5.6%±14%, respectively; P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Continued once-per-day use of a topical corticosteroid, even a weak one, was protective against rejection episodes during the second year after DMEK, whereas 6% experienced a rejection episode when steroids were discontinued. Among the 364 eyes that completed 12 months' follow-up, only 1 graft (0.27%) failed.

Expert opinion in the management of aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Disease (DED).

BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) affects millions of people worldwide. There are a variety of new treatments beyond traditional therapies such as preservative free artificial tears. Here, we conduct a survey to identify the most common treatments used among specialists and assess their interest in newer therapies. METHODS: An international survey was distributed to dry eye researchers and expert practitioners via an internet survey. The survey data collected were analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen respondents completed the survey; of these, 66 % were cornea specialists. The most commonly prescribed topical treatments included cyclosporine A (CSA) 0.05 % (71/104, 68 %), fluorometholone (FML) 0.1 % (59/99, 60 %), loteprednol etabonate 0.5 % (50/99, 51 %), and autologous serum eye drops (ASD; 48/97, 49 %). The most commonly prescribed non-topical medications included essential fatty acid supplements (72/104, 69 %), low-dose doxycycline (oral; 61/100, 61 %), and flaxseed supplements (32/96, 33 %) as well as punctal plugs (76/102, 75 %). Respondents reported treatment with topical corticosteroids for 2 to 8 weeks (46/86, 53 %), followed by less than 2 weeks (24/86, 28 %) and with topical CSA between 2 to 8 weeks (45/85, 53 %) followed by 2 to 6 months (24/85, 28 %). The top three signs and symptoms reported to indicate treatment response were, in order, fluorescein staining of the cornea, reduction in foreign body sensation, and reduction in burning sensation. CONCLUSION: This survey offers insight into current expert opinion in the treatment of DED. The results of this survey are hypothesis generating and will aid in the design of future clinical studies.

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Efficacy of Topical Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Versus Cyclosporine-A 0.05% for Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical loteprednol etabonate (LE) 0.5% compared with cyclosporine A (CsA) 0.05% for the prophylaxis and treatment of dry eye syndrome (DES) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: Seventy-five patients were randomized to LE (n = 76 eyes of 38 patients) or CsA (n = 74 eyes of 37 patients) pre-HSCT. Lissamine green and fluorescein staining, tear break-up time, tear osmolarity (Osm), Schirmer score (Sch), intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were assessed pre-HSCT, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-HSCT. RESULTS: There were no differences in DES incidence (P = 0.22; log-rank test) or progression (P = 0.41; log-rank test) between the 2 treatment arms during the course of the study. Among eyes with no DES at enrollment, the Kaplan-Meier analysis yielded a 90% rate of DES development in cyclosporine-treated eyes and a 79% rate of DES development in LE-treated eyes by 12 months post-HSCT. The Kaplan-Meier analysis of eyes with DES at enrollment demonstrated a 38% rate of disease progression among cyclosporine-treated eyes and a 26% rate of disease progression among loteprednol-treated eyes by 12 months. No patient in either group had an elevation of 10 mm Hg or greater from baseline at any study visit, and no patients had their treatment discontinued for elevation in intraocular pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-HSCT initiation of LE 0.5% appears to be safe and may be as effective as CsA 0.5% for the treatment and prophylaxis of DES following HSCT.