Digital morphology compared to the optical microscope: A validation study on reporting bone marrow aspirates.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of the utilization for clinical reporting of the evaluation of digital images of bone marrow aspirates by morphologists and their comparability with the classic microscopic morphological evaluation. METHODS: We scanned 180 consecutive bone marrow needle aspirates smears using the "Metafer4 VSlide" whole slide imaging (WSI) digital scanning system. We evaluated the statistical comparability and the risk of bias of the microscopic readings with those performed on the screen on the digitized medullary images. RESULTS: The evaluation of cellularity on the screen was equivalent, with a higher frequency of "normal" than the analysis of digital preparations. The means and medians of the percentage values obtained on the different cell populations with the microscopic and digital reading were comparable as the main categories are concerned, with an average difference equal to 0 for the neutrophilic and eosinophilic granulocytic series, at -0.2% for the total myeloid cells, at 1.2% for the erythroid series, at -0.4% for the lymphocytes and at -0.4% for the blasts. Dysplastic features were consistently identified in 69/71 cell lineages. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that screen evaluation of digitized bone marrow needle aspirates provides quantitative and qualitative results comparable to traditional microscopic analysis of the corresponding slide smears. Digital images offer significant benefits in reducing the workload of experienced operators, reproducibility and sharing of observations, and image preservation. Even in routine diagnostic activities, their use does not alter the quality of the results obtained in evaluating bone marrow needle aspirates.

Intraosseous Specimens Submitted to the Laboratory: A Case Report and Review.

Intraosseous (IO) devices are used for vascular access in settings where venous access is initially unobtainable, such as prehospital trauma care or cardiac arrest. While IO devices are effective for infusion of blood, fluids, and medications, there is limited data on the analytical equivalence of specimens taken out of IO devices and peripheral venous blood. Despite this, IO device manufacturers and clinical resources state that IO specimens can be submitted for laboratory analysis. As reported in this case, IO specimens may be drawn and labeled as 'peripheral blood'. IO specimens are not always caught by automated sample quality testing and may proceed through analysis without any warning signal to the laboratory. There are potential regulatory risks in accepting IO samples for analysis without validation. IO infusion is a valuable technique for vascular access in critically ill patients, but clinical laboratories will need to determine their own policies for identifying and handling IO specimens.

Revisiting Bone Marrow Core Biopsy Adequacy Criteria in the Era of Extensive Ancillary Testing.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow core biopsy is a routine component of comprehensive marrow evaluation, and adequacy criteria have been recommended. However, the effectiveness of these adequacy criteria for diagnostic bone marrow evaluation needs to be reassessed in the current era of extensive ancillary testing. We aimed to determine the impact of core biopsy length and intertrabecular area of evaluable bone marrow on overall adequacy for diagnostic marrow evaluation at our tertiary care institution. METHODS: Five hundred sequential cases of iliac crest bone marrow sampling were identified by retrospective re-view at our tertiary care institution. In this cohort, 470 core biopsies were obtained for histologic evaluation. Data including gross core biopsy length, number of intertrabecular 40x high power fields of evaluable marrow, and other pathologic/clinical parameters were compiled. RESULTS: The mean core biopsy length was 1.2 cm, and only 23% measured the recommended ≥ 1.5 cm. However, 96% of the core biopsies were interpretable and contributed to the comprehensive bone marrow evaluation. Notably, 100% of biopsies with ≥ 5.5 intertrabecular areas were contributory. Ancillary testing including immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and/or molecular studies were performed in > 99% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: When histology was integrated with ancillary testing, the overall diagnosis was substantially limited in only 0.4% of cases and material deemed entirely insufficient in 0.4%. The number of intertrabecular 40x areas of evaluable marrow is a better predictor of adequacy than core biopsy length, and adequacy criteria should be revised in this era of extensive ancillary testing.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) in non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Interlaboratory reproducibility on marrow samples with very low levels of disease within the FIL (Fondazione Italiana Linfomi) MRD Network.

In 2009, the four laboratories of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) minimal residual disease (MRD) Network started a collaborative effort to harmonize and standardize their methodologies at the national level, performing quality control (QC) rounds for follicular lymphoma (FL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) MRD assessment. In 16 QC rounds between 2010 and 2017, the four laboratories received 208 bone marrow (BM) samples (126 FL; 82 MCL); 187 were analyzed, according to the EuroMRD Consortium guidelines, by both nested (NEST) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative (RQ) PCR for BCL2/IGH MBR or IGHV rearrangements. Here, we aimed at analyzing the samples that challenged the interlaboratory reproducibility and data interpretation. Overall, 156/187 BM samples (83%) were concordantly classified as NEST+/RQ+ or NEST-/RQ- by all the four laboratories. The remaining 31 samples (17%) resulted alternatively positive and negative in the interlaboratory evaluations, independently of the method and the type of rearrangement, and were defined "borderline" (brd) samples: 12 proved NEST brd/RQ brd, 7 NEST-/RQ brd, 10 NEST brd/RQ positive not quantifiable (PNQ), and 2 NEST brd/RQ-. Results did not change even increasing the number of replicates/sample. In 6/31 brd samples, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was tested and showed no interlaboratory discordance. Despite the high interlaboratory reproducibility in the MRD analysis obtained and maintained by the QC round strategy, samples with the lowest MRD levels can still represent a challenge: 17% (31/187) of our samples showed discordant results in interlaboratory assessments, with 6.4% (12/187) remained brd even applying the two methods. Thus, although representing a minority, brd samples are still problematic, especially when a clinically oriented interpretation of MRD results is required. Alternative, novel methods such as ddPCR and next-generation sequencing have the potential to overcome the current limitations.

Comparison of the bone marrow trephine sample quality between OnControl drill system and the Jamshidi needle.

INTRODUCTION: Bone marrow biopsies are a key diagnostic and monitoring intervention in haematology with manual bone marrow techniques the established method of choice. Powered biopsy devices are now available, but are not widely used in haematology. This study compared the quality of bone marrow trephines obtained with the Jamshidi needle and OnControl powered drill system. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was undertaken on trephine samples prior to and after implementation of the OnControl drill system. Trephine size and quality were assessed independently by three pathologists and compared between techniques and operators using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: There were 164 samples assessed (Jamshidi n = 69, OnControl, same site as aspirate n = 48, OnControl, separate site from aspirate n = 47). The assessable and total length were similar between the Jamshidi and OnControl techniques, with increased crush artefact observed with the OnControl drill (P < 0.001). Using a separate puncture site for trephine collection and aspirate did not reduce the artefact seen with the OnControl system (P = 0.274). Smaller samples (P < 0.001) and an increase in crushed (P = 0.009) and connective tissue (P = 0.002) were seen in trephines obtained by nonlaboratory-based trainees, regardless of the needle used or their stage of training, compared to laboratory trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Trephines obtained by either method had similar assessable areas. The OnControl system was associated with more artefact, a finding in line with previous studies. There was no improvement by sampling the trephine from a separate site to the aspirate. Laboratory-based trainees who reviewed marrow morphology produced trephines with better assessable length than those not based in the laboratory.

Combined Pathology-Driven Algorithmic Testing and Integrated Reporting for Bone Marrow Examination.

CONTEXT.­: The College of American Pathologists published guideline recommending bone marrow synoptic reporting for hematologic neoplasms. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate the impact of pathology-driven algorithmic testing (PDAT) with integrated reporting for bone marrow examination on test utilization, ability to render a specific World Health Organization diagnosis, and clinician satisfaction 1 year after implementation. DESIGN.­: We reviewed the hematopathology reports, integrated synoptic reports, and ancillary test results generated during a 12-month period. The initial diagnosis from the hematopathology report was compared with the final diagnosis on the integrated synoptic reports. Test utilization data were compared with a previous year in which ancillary testing was ordered at clinician discretion. Clinicians were anonymously surveyed to assess their satisfaction with PDAT and integrated reporting. RESULTS.­: Integrated reporting resulted in a World Health Organization diagnosis for 80 of 85 cases (94%) compared with 54 (64%) for the hematopathology report alone. Unnecessary testing decreased from 45% pre-PDAT (124 of 274 cases) to 0.7% PDAT (2 of 268 cases), and PDAT resulted in fewer omissions of necessary tests. Clinicians preferred PDAT and valued integrated reporting for a variety of reasons, including the ease of finding relevant prognostic information. CONCLUSIONS.­: Pathology-driven algorithmic testing with integrated reporting improves the pathologist's ability to render a specific World Health Organization diagnosis and improves test utilization. Clinicians prefer PDAT to clinician-ordered testing. This is the first study to examine how synoptic reporting can modify hematologic diagnoses.

Trends in Bone Marrow Sampling and Core Biopsy Specimen Adequacy in the United States and Canada: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess bone marrow (BM) sampling in academic medical centers. METHODS: Data from 6,374 BM samples obtained in 32 centers in 2001 and 2011, including core length (CL), were analyzed. RESULTS: BM included a biopsy (BMB; 93%) specimen, aspirate (BMA; 92%) specimen, or both (83%). The median (SD) CL was 12 (8.5) mm, and evaluable marrow was 9 (7.6) mm. Tissue contraction due to processing was 15%. BMB specimens were longer in adults younger than 60 years, men, and bilateral, staging, and baseline samples. Only 4% of BMB and 2% of BMB/BMA samples were deemed inadequate for diagnosis. BM for plasma cell dyscrasias, nonphysician operators, and ancillary studies usage increased, while bilateral sampling decreased over the decade. BM-related quality assurance programs are infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: CL is shorter than recommended and varies with patient age and sex, clinical circumstances, and center experience. While pathologists render diagnoses on most cases irrespective of CL, BMB yield improvement is desirable.

Improving bone marrow biopsy quality through peer discussion and data comparisons: A single institution experience.

INTRODUCTION: Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is crucial for the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of a variety of hematologic diseases. Obtaining an adequate BMB can be challenging given the need to balance patient comfort with acquisition of high quality specimens. We had observed variable BMB quality at our institution with poor quality specimens sometimes affecting diagnosis. We thus undertook this quality improvement (QI) project to improve the quality of diagnostic BMB specimens. METHODS: We used an A3 QI process to identify factors possibly influencing BMB quality. We collected baseline data on 211 BMB, with short and long-term follow-up data on a further 382 cases. We used clinical conferences to discuss data, perform peer comparisons and identify strategies to create a sustainable improvement in BMB quality. RESULTS: Baseline data showed that BMB length was influenced most by the individual performer, with some influence of needle gauge. Other factors such as sedation, BMB indication were noncontributory. BMB lengths improved following performer education and individual performer data comparisons (15.2 mm post vs 12.8 mm baseline, P < .0001) and with use of an 8- rather than 11-gauge needle (18.3 mm 8-gauge vs 13.3 mm 11-gauge P < .0001), and were sustained over the long term. CONCLUSIONS: Education on BMB standards, sharing of performer data, and changing needle gauge are relatively straightforward methods to improve BMB quality, leading to easier pathology diagnosis.

Digital image analysis agrees with visual estimates of adult bone marrow trephine biopsy cellularity.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of cellularity is an essential component of bone marrow trephine biopsy examination. The standard practice is to report the results as visual estimates (VE). Digital image analysis (DIA) offers the promise of more objective measurements of cellularity. METHODS: Adult bone marrow trephine biopsy sections were assessed for cellularity by VE. Sections were scanned using an Aperio AT2 Scanscope and analyzed using a Cytonuclear (version 1.4) algorithm on halo software. Intraclass correlation (ICC) was used to assess relatedness between VE and DIA, and between MRI and DIA for a separate subset of patients. Trephine biopsy sections from a subset of patients with bone marrow biopsies uninvolved by malignancy were assessed for age-related changes. RESULTS: Interobserver VE agreement was good to excellent. The ICC value was 0.81 for VE and DIA, and 0.50 for MRI and DIA. Linearity studies showed no statistically significant trend for age-related changes in cellularity in our cohort (r = -.29, P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: Agreement was good between VE and DIA. It may be possible to use DIA or VE to measure cellularity in the appropriate clinical scenario. The limited sample size precludes similar determinations for MRI calculations. Further studies examining healthy donors are necessary before making definitive conclusions regarding age and cellularity.

Cytomorphology review of 100 newly diagnosed lower-risk MDS patients in the European LeukemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) registry reveals a high inter-observer concordance.

The European LeukemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) registry is collecting data of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients belonging to the IPSS low or intermediate-1 category, newly diagnosed by local cytologists. The diagnosis of MDS can be challenging, and some data report inter-observer variability with regard to the assessment of the MDS subtype. In order to ensure that correct diagnoses were made by the participating centres, blood and bone marrow slides of 10% of the first 1000 patients were reviewed by an 11-person panel of cytomorphologists. All slides were rated by at least 3 panel members (median 8 panel members; range 3-9). Marrow slides from 98 out of 105 patients were of good quality and therefore could be rated properly according to the WHO 2001 classification, including assessment of dysplastic lineages. The agreement between the reviewers whether the diagnosis was MDS or non-MDS was strong with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.85. Six cases were detected not to fit the entry criteria of the registry, because they were diagnosed uniformly as CMML or AML by the panel members. The agreement by WHO 2001 classification was strong as well (ICC = 0.83). The concordance of the assessment of dysplastic lineages was substantial for megakaryopoiesis and myelopoiesis and moderate for erythropoiesis. Our data show that in general, the inter-observer agreement was high and a very low percentage of misdiagnosed cases had been entered into the EUMDS registry. Further studies including histomorphology are warranted.

Bone marrow biopsies performed by both the powered OnControl drill device and the Jamshidi needle produce adequate specimens.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the adequacy and quality of the bone marrow (BM) obtained by OnControl powered drill (P-group) and to compare it with manual procedure (M-group). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis was done on 75 BM specimens; Jamshidi needle (n=44) and OnControl (n=31). Biopsy length after fixation, evaluable marrow length and total area, and fragmentation, aspiration and marrow dropout artefacts were compared. RESULTS: Biopsies were sufficient for diagnosis in 38/44 cases (86%) in the M-group and in 26/31 cases (83%) in the P-group. The most common reason for suboptimal/inadequate biopsies was subcortical specimens (4/6) in the M-group and aspiration artefact (5/5) in the P-group. Average length after fixation, evaluable marrow length, evaluable marrow area was comparable. Aspiration artefact was minimal (<10%) in the majority of BM samples in the M-group (31/44), while 25/31 BM in the P-group showed >10% aspiration artefact, p<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that quality of biopsy cylinder and adequacy rate of the biopsy is comparable between both devices. OnControl device showed more aspiration artefact.

Incremental value of the bone marrow trephine biopsy in detecting residual leukemia following treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Most guidelines suggest that only the bone marrow aspirate (BMA) is necessary to assess residual disease following intensive chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with the bone marrow trephine biopsy (BMTB) recommended in cases of a poor quality BMA. We performed a retrospective study evaluating this in a cohort of patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for AML. Residual disease was assessed by morphological examination of the BMA and BMTB±immunohistochemistry. Of the 647 marrows 32.6% were interim marrows performed prior to peripheral count recovery, 41.7% were end of induction (EOI) marrows and the remaining were 'other marrows'. The BMA and BMTB findings were concordant in 92.8% of cases. The BMTB led to a change in diagnosis from 'no leukemia' to 'residual leukemia' in 5.2% of interim, 3.7% of EOI and 2.4% of 'other' marrows. The BMA alone had a sensitivity of 86.8% in detecting residual leukemia and of 82.3%, 82.5% and 94.2% for interim, EOI and 'other marrows', respectively. Despite the high concordance between the BMA and the BMTB the poor sensitivity of the BMA in detecting residual leukemia, particularly at EOI, may lead to an overestimation of the complete remission rates which may have therapeutic and clinical trial implications.

Current opinion and consensus statement regarding the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patients with essential thrombocythemia: a survey of the Spanish Group of Ph-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (GEMFIN) using the Delphi method.

The current consensus on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of essential thrombocythemia (ET) is based on experts' recommendations. However, several aspects of the diagnosis of, prognosis of, and therapy for ET are still controversial. The Delphi method was employed with an expert panel of members of the Spanish Group of Ph-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in order to identify the degree of agreement on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of ET. Nine leading experts selected a total of 41 clinical hematologists with well-known expertise in ET. An electronic questionnaire was used to collect the questions rated in a four-step scale. The questions were grouped into four blocks: diagnosis, risk stratification, goals of therapy, and treatment strategy. After the first round consisting of 80 questions, a second round including 14 additional questions focused on the recommendations advocated by experts of the European LeukemiaNet in 2011 was analyzed. The median and mean values for the first and second rounds were calculated. A summary of the conclusions considered as the most representative of each block of questions is presented. The Delphi method is a powerful instrument to address the current approaches and controversies surrounding ET.

External bone marrow cytological examination quality assurance (EQAhem)--summary after 6 years in Poland.

Bone marrow macroscopic examination remains one of the most difficult and subjective laboratory assessments in hematology. Only a few external quality assurance programs in the field are present worldwide. We have developed an external quality assurance program EQAhem that allows assessment of the whole process of bone marrow examination. The program participants assess blood and bone marrow smears from the patient, identify selected cells from photographs provided to them, and interpret the microscopic results. In this article, the results of the EQAhem program in Poland from 6 years are summarized. During this time, 62 labs were assessed in total, and positive results were achieved by 89.25 % labs, taking into account all tests. Correct responses with respect to the percentage of cell count were provided by ca. 77.5 % labs. Slightly worse results were obtained when megakaryocyte count and cell identification from photographs were tested. The worst results were obtained in case of dysplasia assessment and clinical interpretation of microscopic examination (54.1 and 58.6 % correct responses, respectively). EQAhem delivers precise information about the quality of bone marrow examinations performed in Poland and has a substantial educational value. We believe that after 6 years, EQAhem has significantly improved the quality of bone marrow microscopic examinations performed in Poland.

Leishman and Giemsa stain: a new reliable staining technique for blood/bone marrow smears.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral blood and bone marrow smear examination is an important basic tool for the diagnosis of different haematological conditions including haematological malignancies. We created a newer modification of the conventional Leishman and Giemsa stains as Leishman and Giemsa (L&G) stain and compared the efficacy and reliability of this stain with conventional stains. The study was performed to evaluate the staining efficacy, feasibility, time and cost of L&G stain over the conventional Leishman and Giemsa stains. METHODS: A pilot study was carried out in the Department of Haematology of our hospital from October 2013 to December 2013. Hundred selected cases, each with peripheral blood and bone marrow smears were taken, and three sets of the smears were prepared from each sample--one for L&G stain and other two--one each for conventional Leishman and Giemsa stains. This staining is further incorporated in our routine standard operating protocols for staining of all the peripheral blood smears in automated stainer, Sysmex SP10. RESULT: The average grading score from each staining methods from all the three experts was compiled. The average grading score of L&G staining method was noted to be significantly higher than the other two methods (analysis of variance test, P value < 0.05). When modified L&G stain (C) was compared with stain conventional stains (A and B), a P value of <0.001 was noted in all parameters except between Leishman stain and L&G stain in mature RBC and WBC nucleus and RBC inclusions (P value between 0.05 and 0.001). CONCLUSION: L&G staining is a newer staining technique of immense help in high-throughput haematology laboratories by offering a time-saving, cost-effective and better staining option to conventional staining methods. It gives a better nuclear and cytoplasmic differential staining and can also be used in automated blood counters/stainer.

ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow immunohistochemistry.

Bone marrow (BM) tissue biopsy evaluation, including trephine biopsy and clot section, is an integral part of BM investigation and is often followed by ancillary studies, in particular immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC provides in situ coupling of morphological assessment and immunophenotype. The number of different IHC tests that can be applied to BM trephine biopsies and the number of indications for IHC testing is increasing concurrently with the development of flow cytometry and molecular diagnostic methods. An international Working Party for the Standardization of Bone Marrow IHC was formed by the International Council for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH) to prepare a set of guidelines for the standardization of BM IHC based on currently available published evidence and modern understanding of quality assurance principles as applied to IHC in general. The guidelines were discussed at the ICSH General Assemblies and reviewed by an international panel of experts to achieve further consensus and represent further development of the previously published ICSH guidelines for the standardization of BM specimens handling and reports.

Spectrum of diseases diagnosed on bone marrow examination of 285 infants in a single tertiary care center.

OBJECTIVES: Bone marrow (BM) aspiration and trephine biopsy is one of the most valuable procedures in the evaluation of hematological disorders. There is a shortage of published literature regarding the indications, procedure, and outcome of bone marrow examination (BME) in neonates and infants. The aim of the present study is to analyze the common indications of performing BME and to assess the spectrum of disorders diagnosed from BM of neonates and infants. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of BMEs performed in infants over a period of 5 years, between 2009 and 2013 was done. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 297 BME were performed on 285 infants, which constitutes 10.3% of pediatric BME procedures during the same period. In our institute, BME is routinely performed by trained pathologists from posterior superior iliac spine in children including infants and neonates with an overall sample adequacy of 97%. Evaluation of cytopenias and suspicion of storage disorder were the most common indications for BME procedure, while acute leukemias and storage disorders were the most common diagnoses offered in infant BM. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior superior iliac spine is a good site of BME in neonates and infants. BM trephine biopsy is a difficult procedure in this age group, however remains indispensable in situations where an infiltrative pathology is suspected. BME not only helps to make specific diagnoses but should also be used as an extremely valuable, quick, and economically viable procedure to exclude major hematological disorders including certain forms of storage disorder and hematological malignancy in this age group.

Pathology reporting of bone marrow biopsy in myelofibrosis; application of the Delphi consensus process to the development of a standardised diagnostic report.

AIMS: The diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) strongly relies on the bone marrow biopsy findings, but a report model has not been standardised. Our aim was to establish general recommendations for bone marrow evaluation and standardised reporting in a case suspicious of PMF. METHODS: The Delphi method was employed to obtain expert consensus. An advisory panel of 10 leading members identifies a total of 37 haematopathology experts to participate. The first Delphi round included a questionnaire with three main groups of items: minimal clinical and laboratory data considered necessary before reporting, minimal descriptive aspects to record and main histological differential diagnosis. The final report content was based on consensus obtained after the second Delphi round. RESULTS: The minimal data considered necessary were age, splenomegaly, haemoglobin, leucocyte and platelet counts, differential blood cell count, leucoerythroblastic blood picture, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, BCR-ABL and JAK2 mutational status, reticulin stain and the internal control for the reticulin staining. The minimal descriptive aspects to report were cellularity, osteosclerosis, megakaryocytic morphology and localisation, dense megakaryocytic clusters, quantity of granulocytic precursors, grade of myelofibrosis in a scale of 4, and a proposed final diagnostic approach. The entities to be considered for differential diagnosis were mainly the other classical chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi method is a robust tool to determine essential information to be included in a pathology report. A standardised good-quality histopathological report form may help to homogenise PMF diagnosis. A close collaboration between the pathologist and the haematologist is desirable according to our survey.

Improving the quality of bone marrow assessment: Impact of operator techniques and use of a specimen preparation checklist.

BACKGROUND: Successful bone marrow assessment is essential to the diagnosis and staging of hematologic malignancies. The objective of this study was to determine whether specific operator techniques and/or use of a specimen preparation checklist could impact the quality of bone marrow assessment by reducing the frequency of nonspicular aspirates, small cores, and nondiagnostic samples. METHODS: All bone marrow biopsies performed at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from April, 2012 to September, 2012 were eligible for inclusion. Six operator techniques were linked with specimen quality in a preintervention cohort. Next, a specimen preparation checklist was implemented, and outcomes were compared from the preintervention and postintervention cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 830 procedures performed by 41 operators were prospectively observed and analyzed. In the preintervention cohort (n = 413), no operator technique was associated with specimen quality in multivariable models accounting for patient characteristics and operator. Compared with the preintervention cohort, in multivariable analyses, the postintervention cohort (n = 417) had decreased odds of nondiagnostic specimens (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.87; P = .01) and core lengths ≤1 cm (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.90; P = .009), but there was no significant difference in spicularity. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the operator techniques studied did not have an impact on specimen quality, but implementation of a specimen preparation checklist significantly improved core length and frequency of diagnostic samples.