Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Complications in Pediatric Tissue Expansion.

BACKGROUND: Tissue expanders represent one of the main surgical options for skin reconstruction in cases of tumors, traumalike burn injury, scar contracture, and alopecia. However, the tissue expander device is also associated with complications such as infection and extrusion. The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for major complications of use of tissue expanders in pediatric patients using multivariate analysis. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center observational study was performed over 10 years in pediatric patients who were treated with tissue expanders for tumors, nevus, scars, burn reconstruction, and alopecia from April 2012 to March 2022. The primary outcome was overall complications per operation and expander, including infection and extrusion. Ten predictor variables were included as risk factors based on previous studies and as new factors considered important from clinical experience. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for major complications such as expander infection or extrusion. RESULTS: The study included 44 patients who underwent 92 operations using 238 tissue expanders. The overall complication rate per expander was 14.3%. Univariate logistic regression analysis identified associations of younger age, number of expanders used per operation, history of infection, and tissue expander locations with a higher complication rate. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, younger age (odds ratio, 1.14; P = 0.043) was associated with a high likelihood of expander complications. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age is an independent risk factor for tissue expander complications in pediatric patients. This factor should be considered in preoperative planning and discussions with the patient's family.

Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction With Gas vs Saline Tissue Expanders: Does the Fill Type Matter?

The most common reconstruction technique following mastectomy is a 2-stage technique that involves tissue expansion followed by definitive implant-based reconstruction (IBR). Tissue expanders (TEs) have classically used saline for initial fill; however, TEs with an initial gas fill (GTE)-including the CO2-based AeroForm (AirXpanders, San Francisco, CA) TE and TEs initially filled with atmospheric air-have been increasingly used in the past decade. We aimed to compare the outcomes in breast reconstruction for tissue expanders initially filled with saline vs gas. PubMed was queried for studies comparing gas- and saline-filled tissue expanders (STEs) used in IBR. A meta-analysis was performed on major postoperative outcomes and the required expansion and definitive reconstruction time. Eleven studies were selected and included in the analysis. No significant differences existed between tissue expansion with GTEs vs STEs for 11 of the 13 postoperative outcomes investigated. Out of the complications investigated, only the risk of infection/cellulitis/abscess formation was significantly lower in the GTE cohort (odds ratio 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.82; P = .0009). The time to definitive reconstruction was also significantly lower in the GTE cohort (mean difference [MD], 45.85 days; 95% CI, -57.80 to -33.90; P < .00001). The total time to full expansion approached significance in the GTE cohort (MD, -20.33 days; 95% CI, -41.71 to 1.04; P = .06). A cost analysis considering TE cost and infection risk determined that GTE use saved a predicted $2055.34 in overall healthcare costs. Surgical outcomes for both fill types were predominantly similar; however, GTEs were associated with a significantly decreased risk of postoperative infection compared to saline-filled TEs. GTEs could also reduce healthcare expenditures and require less time until definitive reconstruction after placement.

Pre-pectoral Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Conservative Mastectomy Using Acellular Dermal Matrix and Semi-smooth Implants.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Improvements in acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and surgical techniques have facilitated pre-pectoral immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Outer shell texturing is a key risk factor for anaplastic large cell lymphoma, prompting this evaluation of reconstruction with nano-textured rounded implants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients underwent 72 pre-pectoral ADM-assisted (fenestrated SurgiMend™) IBRs using nano-textured implants (Sebbin™). Patients were invited to complete a satisfaction questionnaire, including aesthetic outcome (linear scale 0-10) during follow-up. RESULTS: Average mastectomy weight was 300 g (range=83-1,018 g). After a mean follow-up of 18.3 month, 2 patients (2.8%) had minor wound complications. One patient suffered nipple necrosis. Capsular contracture occurred in 5 cases (6.9%) and significant rippling in one case. No implants were lost. Patient-reported aesthetic outcomes had a mean score of 9.3 (range=3-10; N=71). CONCLUSION: Pre-pectoral ADM-assisted IBR using semi-smooth implants following NSM is reliable and safe, with a low incidence of complications and high patient satisfaction.

From Salvage to Prevention: A Single-Surgeon Experience with Acellular Dermal Matrix and Infection in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Increasing amounts of acellular dermal matrix are being used with the adoption of prepectoral breast reconstruction. Postoperative infection remains a challenge in breast reconstruction, and the contribution of acellular dermal matrix type, processing, and sterility assurance level to risk of complications in prepectoral reconstruction is not well studied. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction from February of 2017 to July of 2020. Because of an increase in the rate of infection, the drain protocol was changed and acellular dermal matrix type was switched from AlloDerm (sterility assurance level, 10-3) to DermACELL (sterility assurance level, 10-6) in January of 2019. Demographic and surgical variables were collected, in addition to details regarding development and management of infection. RESULTS: Despite higher rates of direct-to-implant reconstruction and bilateral procedures and increased implant volumes, the rate of infection was significantly lower in patients who received DermACELL instead of AlloDerm [two of 38 (5.3 percent) versus 11 of 41 (26.8 percent); p = 0.014]. Drain duration was slightly longer in the DermACELL group, consistent with the change in drain protocol. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics remained similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: With increased reliance on large amounts of acellular dermal matrix for prepectoral breast reconstruction, it directly follows that the properties of acellular dermal matrix with respect to incorporation, sterility, and implant support are that much more important to consider. There have been few studies comparing different types of acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction, and further research is required to determine the contribution of acellular dermal matrix type and processing techniques to development of postoperative infection. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Acellular Dermal Matrix-Associated Contracture: A Clinical and Histologic Analysis of Patients Undergoing Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture is a well-recognized complication following prosthetic breast reconstruction. It has been the authors' observation that some patients undergoing breast reconstruction experience contracture specifically of the acellular dermal matrix placed at the time of their tissue expander insertion. The goal of the authors' study was to identify clinical and histologic findings associated with the development of acellular dermal matrix-associated contracture. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction performed by the senior author (M.S.A.). Patients were excluded if they had radiation therapy to the breast. Patients with suspected acellular dermal matrix-associated contracture were identified by clinical photographs and review of operative notes. Histologic analysis was performed on specimens taken from two patients with acellular dermal matrix contracture. RESULTS: The authors included a total of 46 patients (92 breasts), of which 19 breasts had suspected acellular dermal matrix-associated contracture. Acellular dermal matrix contracture was less common in direct-to-implant reconstruction (4.2 percent versus 26.5 percent; p = 0.020) and more common in breasts that had seromas (0 percent versus 15.8 percent; p = 0.001) or complications requiring early expander replacement. Contracted acellular dermal matrix had less vascularity and a lower collagen I-to-collagen III ratio, and was twice as thick as noncontracted acellular dermal matrix. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have described a distinct phenomenon of acellular dermal matrix-associated contracture that occurs in a small subset of breasts where acellular dermal matrix is used. This merits further investigation. Future work will be required to better characterize the clinical factors that make acellular dermal matrix-associated contracture more likely to occur. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Ear Reconstruction with the Combination of Expanded Skin Flap and Medpor Framework: 20 Years of Experience in a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: In ear reconstruction, the difficulty lies in reestablishing the ear's bionic form with adequate skin coverage and an appropriate framework. Skin expansion and a porous polyethylene (i.e., Medpor) framework are often used for ear reconstruction. However, a long-term review of the combined application of the expanded skin and Medpor framework has not been reported. This article reviews ear reconstruction combining these two factors over the past 20 years in the authors' center to summarize the surgical technique and analyze the postoperative results and complications. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed that included all patients who underwent ear reconstruction with expanded skin and Medpor framework in the authors' center between 1998 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients with microtia who were admitted to the authors' center for surgical ear reconstruction were included, and 70 ears were reconstructed. Fifty-seven of the patients (83.82 percent) felt satisfied with their reconstructed ear, five patients (7.35 percent) were not satisfied with the reconstructed ear, and six patients (8.82 percent) had the frameworks removed. Fifteen patients (22.06 percent) developed complications, including framework exposure (13.24 percent), infection (4.41 percent), scar hypertrophy (4.41 percent), and hematoma (2.94 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Framework exposure limits the combined application of expanded skin flap and Medpor framework when reconstructing the ear without additional fascial interposition. Using a temporoparietal fascia or postauricular fascia flap during the operation is effective to decrease the exposure rate; however, this complication cannot be completely avoided. Using postauricular fascia and skin graft may lead to scar hypertrophy; thus, these techniques should be used with caution. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

What Is the Impact of Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Tissue Expander Infection Rates in Pediatric Patients?

BACKGROUND: Tissue expansion in the pediatric population can be complicated by high rates of infection and extrusion. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on infectious complications. METHODS: A retrospective study of all pediatric patients who underwent tissue expander insertion at a children's hospital over a 12-year period was performed. Predictor variables included age, sex, race, indication, anatomical location, number of expanders inserted, serial expansion, history of infection or extrusion, and postoperative antibiotics. Outcome variables included infection and extrusion. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with infection and/or extrusion. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients who underwent 317 operations for tissue expander insertion were included in this study. Postoperative infection and/or extrusion occurred after 73 operations (23 percent). Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed after 232 operations (75 percent), and only perioperative (≤24 hours) antibiotics were administered in 85 cases (25 percent). There were no significant differences in the rate of infection (12.1 percent versus 8.9 percent; p = 0.46), extrusion (16.8 percent versus 17.7 percent; p = 0.88), or infection and/or extrusion (23.7 percent versus 24.1 percent; p = 0.95) between these two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative antibiotics did not have a significant association with infection and/or extrusion (OR, 0.84; 95 percent CI, 0.44 to 1.63; p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of infection/extrusion were similar between pediatric patients who received only perioperative antibiotics (≤24 hours) and those who were prescribed a course of postoperative antibiotics. Based on these results, a course of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics may be unnecessary after insertion of tissue expanders in pediatric patients. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Comparative study of patient outcomes between direct to implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction plays a central role in the outcome management of patients with breast cancer, particularly in terms of quality of life (QoL), which must be weighed carefully when considering the available surgical options. In the context of implant-based breast reconstruction, immediate replacement with prosthesis (direct-to-implant (DTI)) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is gaining popularity, at the expense of the traditional two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with tissue expander (TE), and the literature suggests that patients tend to prefer interventions with "immediate" therapeutic efficacy and aesthetic satisfaction that obviate the need for further invasive surgery. We investigated this hypothesis by administering the BREAST-Q™ questionnaire to two groups of patients who had undergone the respective procedures. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional observational study of 192 consecutive mastectomy patients who received implant-based reconstruction, comparing health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), patient-related outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction in patients who had undergone immediate dual plane DTI with ADM (96) versus the two-stage submuscular approach (96). We also counted the number of surgeries required in each group to achieve a definitive outcome. FINDINGS: Our study revealed no major differences in terms of QoL scores, with the two approaches being largely comparable. However, single-stage reconstruction seems to offer the additional advantages of better satisfaction with the care received, sparing the patient temporary body image dissatisfaction and reducing the number of surgeries required, thereby lessening the burden on the patient, the healthcare system and society as a whole.

Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Historically Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The rising popularity of prepectoral tissue expander placement with acellular dermal matrices in immediate breast reconstruction has prompted many studies on the safety of this technique. However, a comprehensive propensity-matched, historically controlled trial comparing perioperative outcomes following prepectoral versus partial subpectoral (dual-plane) placement of tissue expanders is lacking. METHODS: Retrospective propensity-matched cohort analysis was performed on all patients of two senior reconstructive surgeons who underwent bilateral tissue expander placement following a mastectomy with one of three breast surgeons at a single academic institution from 2012 onward (n = 260). Two matched groups (prepectoral and partial subpectoral) each consisted of 102 patients. Univariate and multivariable analyses were also performed to contextualize the risks associated with prepectoral reconstruction relative to demographic characteristics and other clinical factors. RESULTS: Compared to dual-plane subpectoral placement, prepectoral placement resulted in similar rates of overall perioperative complications (32 percent versus 31 percent; p = 1.00) and perioperative complications that required operative treatment (21 percent versus 21 percent; p = 1.00). There were no significant differences between the groups in complication rates for hematomas, seromas, impaired wound healing, and infection. Although prepectoral placement was associated with prolonged time to drain removal, those patients completed the expansion process twice as fast, were expanded further in the operating room, and were more than twice as likely to forgo clinic-based expansion. Prepectoral reconstruction was not associated with increased risk for any complications in univariate or multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral tissue expander placement permitted greater intraoperative filling of expanders and a reduced likelihood of clinic-based expansion, with no increase in adverse outcomes compared to partial subpectoral placement. Adoption of this technique may reduce unnecessary clinic visits; shorten the delay before adjuvant therapy; and minimize patient apprehension, pain, and discomfort related to clinic-based expansion. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Does the Textured-Type Tissue Expander Affect the Outcomes of Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction? A Propensity Score Matching Analysis between Macrotextured and Microtextured Expanders.

BACKGROUND: In two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction, two types of tissue expanders are used for the first stage: microtextured Siltex and macrotextured Biocell. Despite emerging concerns regarding the safety of macrotextured prostheses, the association between the use of macrotextured expanders and adverse outcomes remains unknown clinically. This study aimed to evaluate potential impacts of the type of tissue expander on the long-term outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: Patients who underwent immediate two-stage tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction between 2014 and 2018 were evaluated and categorized into two groups according to the expander type. Those two were propensity score matched for baseline characteristics and compared for complication rates after the first- and second-stage operations. The impacts of several variables, including type of tissue expander used, on outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 1391 cases in 1294 patients, 276 pairs (552 cases) were successfully propensity score matched. In the first-stage operation, the macrotextured group showed a significantly shorter drain indwelling period and lower rate of seroma than the microtextured group. These differences retained influences after adjusting for other variables. Incidence rates of other complications were similar between the groups. Regarding the second-stage operation, the use of macrotextured expanders showed a significant association, with an increased rate of severe capsular contracture on the multivariable analyses in cases using textured implants. Development of other complications was not affected by the expander type. CONCLUSION: The type of tissue expander might influence the outcomes of two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction, and generally acceptable safety of both microtextured and macrotextured expanders was shown. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

A controlled cost and outcomes analysis of acellular dermal matrix and implant-based reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for breast reconstruction continues to change in both single- and two-stage reconstruction. Determining optimal outcomes clinically, aesthetically, financially as well as for the patient's quality of life has become a priority. METHODS: A retrospective review of implant-based reconstructions was performed at a single center from 2010 to 2016, with patients blindly matched 1:1:1 into three cohorts based on reconstruction type: 1) single stage direct to implant with ADM, 2) two-stage tissue expander to implant (TE/I) without ADM, and 3) two-stage TE/I with ADM. Relative cost between groups, esthetic outcomes, and quality of life within each group was analyzed. RESULTS: Group 1 was more likely to be older and use intraoperative angiography, but with fewer overall surgeries and postoperative visits (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in reconstructive success among all three groups (p = 0.85). Cost was significantly higher for group 3 relative to groups 1 and 2. Overall appearance was higher in groups 1 and 3 relative to group 2, with radiation therapy the only independent factor. Group 1 had higher scores using Breast-Q for the physical well-being domain (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to incorporate clinical outcomes, esthetic visual grading, and patient-reported quality within the same cohort of individuals, considering both use of ADM and staging. Despite the added ADM cost, it is proven safe, eliminates time and cost associated with tissue expanders, decreases post-operative visits and can lead to equally as functional and aesthetically pleasing outcomes in single- and two-stage breast reconstructions.

A short-term comparison of expander prosthesis and DIEP flap in breast reconstructions: A prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: There is yet no clear consensus on which method is preferable in secondary breast reconstructions, prosthesis, or autologous tissue. METHODS: In this first prospective randomized study, 29 women underwent reconstruction with expander prosthesis (EP) and 44 with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Inclusion started in 2012 and ended in 2018. Demographic data, complications, surgery time, hospital days, and consulting visits were recorded. Patient satisfaction was evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Health care costs were calculated based on rates from the financial year 2018. Here, we report the results related to the surgery and the first 30 postoperative days. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable regarding demographics and clinical characteristics. Satisfaction with breasts, measured with BREAST-Q, was significantly higher in patients who had undergone reconstruction with DIEP flap compared with EP. Within 30 days after breast reconstruction, significantly fewer women (n = 2) in the EP group suffered complications compared to the DIEP flap group (n = 16; p < 0.01). The health care cost was also significantly higher in the DIEP flap group relative to the EP group (p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: This patient cohort will be studied systematically over time, and results concerning the need for complementary surgery, costs, esthetics, and the patient-reported outcome (PRO) will be reported in future work. In this short-term report, EP seems to be preferable in regard to cost and complications, and DIEP flap is to choose from the patient's perspective.

Judging an Expander by Its Cover: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Impact of Tissue Expander Surface Texture on First-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There is increased scrutiny of texturing on implants and a paucity of data looking at texturing on expanders. Because of the difficulty in controlling potential confounders with these comparative studies, the authors performed propensity matching between smooth and textured tissue expander cohorts to provide definitive insight into the impact of expander texture on breast reconstruction outcomes. METHODS: A single-surgeon experience with immediate two-stage breast reconstruction was reviewed for 90-day postoperative complications after mastectomy and expander placement. Variables extracted included demographics, comorbidities, tissue expander texturing, mastectomy type, infection, seroma, skin flap necrosis, dehiscence, explantation, and overall complication rates. Subjects were 1:1 propensity matched using the nearest neighbor matching algorithm with caliper (maximum propensity score difference) of 0.2, and chi-square test was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity matching, 282 reconstructed breasts were analyzed (141 textured versus 141 smooth expanders). Textured expanders had higher minor infection rates than smooth expanders (5.0 percent versus 0 percent; p = 0.024). Smooth expanders had higher seroma rates than textured expanders (5.0 percent versus 0.7 percent; p = 0.031). Smooth expanders also had longer drain retention (20.4 days versus 16.8 days; p = 0.001). There was no difference in other complications, including major infection, explantation, or any complication, between textured and smooth expanders. CONCLUSIONS: Textured expanders are associated with increased minor infection risk, whereas smooth expanders are associated with increased seroma formation. However, these differing complication profiles coalesce to equal explantation rates. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Surgical management of pediatric renovascular hypertension and midaortic syndrome at a single-center multidisciplinary program.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of various surgical approaches in the treatment of renovascular hypertension and midaortic syndrome (MAS) in children. METHODS: We performed a retrospective medical record review of patients who had undergone surgery for renovascular hypertension from 2010 to 2018 at our center under the care of a multidisciplinary team. The operative interventions included mesenteric artery growth improves circulation (MAGIC), tissue expander-stimulated lengthening of arteries (TESLA), aortic bypass using polytetrafluorethylene, renal artery reimplantation, and autotransplantation. The MAGIC procedure uses the meandering mesenteric artery as a free conduit for aortic bypass. The TESLA procedure is based on lengthening the normal distal aorta and iliac arteries by gradual filling of a retroaortic tissue expander for several weeks, followed by resection of the stenotic aorta and subsequent primary reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were identified, 10 with isolated renal artery stenosis, 26 with MAS, and 3 with systemic inflammatory vasculitis. The median age at presentation and surgery was 6.4 years (range, 0-16.3 years) and 9.3 years (range, 0-9.2 years), respectively. The MAS-associated syndromes included neurofibromatosis type 1 (15.4%) and Williams syndrome (5.1%), although most cases were idiopathic. At surgery, 33.3% had had stage 1 hypertension (HTN), 53.8% stage 2 HTN, and 12.8% normal blood pressure with a median of three antihypertensive medications. Follow-up of 37 patients at a median of 2.5 years demonstrated normal blood pressure in 86.1%, stage 1 HTN in 8.3%, and stage 2 HTN in 5.6%, with a median of one antihypertensive medication for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The patterns of vascular involvement leading to renovascular hypertension in children are variable and complex, requiring thoughtful multidisciplinary planning and surgical decision-making. The MAGIC and TESLA procedures provide feasible approaches for aortic bypass and reconstruction using autologous tissues and will result in normalization of blood pressure in 85% of children 2.5 years after surgery.

Multidisciplinary Application of an External Tissue Expander Device to Improve Patient Outcomes: A Critical Review.

Significance: Continuous external tissue expansion (CETE) is a versatile tool in soft tissue injury management, and could be an addition to the traditional reconstructive ladder. Recent Advances: This critical review discusses the principles and application of CETE, covering a company-sponsored consensus meeting on this emerging technology and highlighting the DermaClose® (Synovis Micro Companies Alliance, Inc., Birmingham, AL) device's unique approach to soft tissue injury management. There is clinical evidence to support the use of CETE in the management of a number of wound types, including fasciotomy, trauma, amputation, and flap donor sites. The device can be applied to open wounds, potentially avoiding the need for a skin graft or other more complex or invasive reconstruction options. DermaClose applies constant tension without restricting blood flow and does not require repeated tightening. Critical Issues: CETE is becoming more widely used by surgeons of different specialties, and numerous reports describing its efficacy and safety in wound management have been published. Surgeons using CETE must follow the correct technique and select patients carefully to achieve optimal outcomes. However, there is no single source of information or consensus recommendations regarding CETE application. Future Directions: Prospective evidence on the efficacy and safety of CETE in clinical practice is required to communicate the best techniques and share important experiences. This will help to solidify its place in the reconstructive ladder as a valuable additional option for surgeons.

Intraoperative Tissue Expansion Using a Foley Catheter for a Scalp Defect: Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Primary closure of the surgical wound during neurosurgical procedures is sometimes difficult because of limited ability to expand the scalp, or because the skin defect is large. Hence, our institution recently adopted the technique of intraoperative tissue expansion using a Foley catheter for these cases. We describe this easily accomplished, readily available, effective, economical technique and describe our experience performing the technique. METHODS: With this procedure, the subcutaneous tissue (usually the subperiosteal layer) surrounding the skin defect is dissected to make a subcutaneous pocket in which to place a 20-French Foley catheter. The standard expander is a 30-mL balloon. The catheter is inserted into the subcutaneous pocket, and the balloon is inflated with 10-30 mL of saline for 5 minutes, after which the balloon is deflated for 3 minutes in a cyclic loading manner. After sufficient expansion, the primary closure of the surgical wound is achieved with minimal tension on the surrounding skin. RESULTS: Between November 2018 and February 2020, we performed this technique in 5 patients, each with a large surgical defect in the scalp. Primary closure was achieved, and postoperative wound healing was excellent in all 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative skin expansion using a Foley catheter-which is easily performed, readily available, and economical-can be used to achieve surgical wound closure during various neurosurgical procedures.

Establishment of a Novel Mouse Model for Soft Tissue Expansion.

BACKGROUND: Despite its increasing use, not much is known about tissue expansion, and its complication rates are significantly high. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish a stable animal model to overcome the limitations and complications of tissue expansion. Although the mouse model has shown several advantages in the in-depth studies, an appropriate mouse expansion model has rarely been reported, likely because of its loose skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A micro expander was designed and implanted under the scalp of a mouse (expanded group); sterilized saline was regularly injected into the expander. In sham-operated mice (control group), a silicone sheet was implanted under the scalp. Skin samples were collected 5 wk after surgery. Histologic changes including epidermal and dermal thickness and collagen fiber arrangement were analyzed. In addition, vascular density and cell proliferation ratio were determined. An ultrastructural analysis was also performed. RESULTS: With the application of the expansion device, the skin became tight and showed area enlargement. The epidermal thickness of the expanded skin increased significantly (P < 0.01), whereas the thickness of the dermis decreased significantly (P < 0.05) as compared with the control skin. Masson staining demonstrated that collagen bundles were arranged more compactly in the expanded skin (P < 0.05) than in the controls. Furthermore, more proliferating cells (P < 0.05) and blood vessels (P < 0.01) were observed. Transmission electron microscopy showed that the fibers of expanded skin were stretched and broken into bundles of various diameters, with abundant active fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable mouse model of scalp skin expansion was successfully established, which may be a promising tool for in-depth studies on skin soft tissue expansion.

Patient-Reported Outcomes after Irradiation of Tissue Expander versus Permanent Implant in Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Whether to irradiate the tissue expander before implant exchange or to defer irradiation until after exchange in immediate, two-stage expander/implant reconstruction remains uncertain. The authors evaluated the effects of irradiation timing on complication rates and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing immediate expander/implant reconstruction. METHODS: Immediate expander/implant reconstruction patients undergoing postmastectomy radiation therapy at 11 Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium sites with demographic, clinical, and complication data were analyzed. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed with BREAST-Q, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire surveys preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Survey scores and complication rates were analyzed using bivariate comparison and multivariable regressions. RESULTS: Of 317 patients who met inclusion criteria, 237 underwent postmastectomy radiation therapy before expander/implant exchange (before-exchange cohort), and 80 did so after exchange (after-exchange cohort). Timing of radiation had no significant effect on risks of overall complications (OR, 1.25; p = 0.46), major complications (OR, 1.18; p = 0.62), or reconstructive failure (OR, 0.72; p = 0.49). Similarly, radiation timing had no significant effect on 2-year patient-reported outcomes measured by the BREAST-Q or the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer survey. Outcomes measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System showed less anxiety, fatigue, and depression in the after-exchange group. Compared with preoperative assessments, 2-year patient-reported outcomes significantly declined in both cohorts for Satisfaction with Breasts, Physical Well-Being, and Sexual Well-Being, but improved for anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation timing (before or after exchange) had no significant effect on complication risks or on most patient-reported outcomes in immediate expander/implant reconstruction. Although lower levels of anxiety, depression, and fatigue were observed in the after-exchange group, these differences may not be clinically significant. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.