Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Med ; 17(3): 417-418, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27165295

RESUMO

Germ cell tumor (GCT) is the most frequent cancer in young men and is highly curable. Almost 80 % of patients with the disease in an advanced stage achieve a reliable response to cisplatin combination chemotherapy. For relapsing or refractory disease, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective therapy. The two most used mobilization strategies for HSC collection are filgrastim alone or filgrastim after chemotherapy (chemomobilization). HSC collection with filgrastim mobilization can be difficult, especially in highly treated patients. While the addition of chemotherapy improves mobilization and reduces the number of apheresis sessions, it can increase morbidity rate as well. We describe a case of a 45-year-old male with classical seminoma who was submitted to orchiectomy. Two months after, he presented progression of the tumor. He received four cycles of cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin, with residual retroperitoneal mass and cervical lymphadenopathy. Further, he was submitted to three more cycles of cisplatin, ifosfamide and paclitaxel. Thereupon, he showed partial response. At that moment, autologous HSC transplantation was considered. In the first mobilization, filgrastim alone was used without success in harvesting. The second mobilization consisted of vinorelbine at day 1 (35 mg/m2) and filgrastim (16 µg/kg) started at day 5. The peak of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood was 32.6 × 106 cells/L on day 8, with 4.73 × 106 cells/kg CD34+ collected on days 8 and 9. The benefits of this scheme include: (a) outpatient administration, (b) fewer doses of filgrastim, (c) minimal risk of febrile neutropenia and (d) reliable prediction of collection day. For these reasons, we conclude that vinorelbine chemomobilization is a great option for GCT, particularly in patients with high risk of mobilization failure. Furthermore, it requires less resource usage, hospitalizations and transfusions than conventional chemomobilization.


Assuntos
Filgrastim/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Hematológicos/administração & dosagem , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Seminoma/terapia , Vimblastina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Vimblastina/administração & dosagem , Vinorelbina
2.
Rev Invest Clin ; 68(4): 181-3, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27623036

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Following the release of the initial presentation of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor), several biosimilars have been developed worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of a Mexican biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in a single transplant center. METHODS: In a group of 19 consecutive patients with multiple sclerosis given autografts, we employed granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to mobilize stem cells from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood, either the original granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (n = 10) or a Mexican granulocyte colony-stimulating factor biosimilar (n = 9). RESULTS: The efficacy of both agents was similar in mobilization capacity, white blood cell count rise, stem cell collection, and kinetics of auto-engraftment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that both granulocyte colony-stimulating factor agents were similar in their efficacy to mobilize stem cells and usefulness in autografts.


Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares/administração & dosagem , Filgrastim/administração & dosagem , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Fármacos Hematológicos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Transplante Autólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA