A clinical evaluation of patients with known mutations (plasminogen and factor XII) with a focus on prophylactic treatment.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor (HAE-nC1-INH) is a rare genetic disease. The symptoms can resemble other forms of hereditary angioedema (HAE), but the specific laboratory values are inconspicuous. The knowledge about treatment strategies in HAE-nC1-INH remains insufficient; most of the drugs are only licensed and approved for other types of HAE. METHODS: An analysis of all patients with HAE-nC1-INH was carried out in a certified angioedema treatment center in southern Germany. Only patients with a confirmed HAE-nC1-INH mutation were included. The impact of disease was monitored with validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included: two families with a factor XII mutation and seven families with a plasminogen mutation. All individuals received icatibant for on-demand therapy-efficient treatment response was reported. Three patients were severely affected, and prophylaxis was initiated with lanadelumab. According to the questionnaires, the clinical course and symptoms improved significantly under this prophylactic regime. CONCLUSION: This is one of the first descriptions of the clinical outcomes as a response to prophylactic treatment with lanadelumab in HAE-nC1-INH patients with a known mutation. The therapeutic management of HAE-1 and HAE-2 should also be the basis of HAE-nC1-INH, including prophylaxis.

[A new anticoagulant strategy: the factor XI inhibitors]. / Una nuova strategia per l'anticoagulazione: gli inibitori del fattore XI.

In the last 10 years the introduction of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has revolutionized the anticoagulant treatment, one of the cornerstones of the therapy for cardiovascular diseases. Thanks to their efficacy at least not inferior compared to vitamin K antagonists and their better safety profile, particularly with regard to intracranial bleeding, DOACs are now the first choice for the prevention of cardioembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Other areas of clinical use for DOACs include the prevention of VTE in orthopedic and oncology surgery and in outpatient cancer patients treated with anticancer therapy, or the use of low-dose in association with aspirin in patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease.An increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding has been reported for some DOACs. In addition, DOACs have also experienced some failures including stroke prevention in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or rheumatic diseases and VTE therapy in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Also, no data are available on DOACs in some particular areas, including severe renal impairment and thrombocytopenia.In recent years, the clinical use of factor XI and factor XII inhibitors has been proposed. Currently, factor XI inhibitors have more clinical data than factor XII inhibitors. This article will report the rationale for the clinical use and the main evidences currently available on factor XI inhibitors.

Coming soon to a pharmacy near you? FXI and FXII inhibitors to prevent or treat thromboembolism.

Anticoagulants have been in use for nearly a century for the treatment and prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolic disorders. The most dreaded complication of anticoagulant treatment is the occurrence of bleeding, which may be serious and even life-threatening. All available anticoagulants, which target either multiple coagulation factors or individual components of the tissue factor (TF) factor VIIa or the common pathways, have the potential to affect hemostasis and thus to increase bleeding risk in treated patients. While direct oral anticoagulants introduced an improvement in care for eligible patients in terms of safety, efficacy, and convenience of treatment, there remain unmet clinical needs for patients requiring anticoagulant drugs. Anticoagulant therapy is sometimes avoided for fear of hemorrhagic complications, and other patients are undertreated due to comorbidities and the perception of increased bleeding risk. Evidence suggests that the contact pathway of coagulation has a limited role in initiating physiologic in vivo coagulation and that it contributes to thrombosis more than it does to hemostasis. Because inhibition of the contact pathway is less likely to promote bleeding, it is an attractive target for the development of anticoagulants with improved safety. Preclinical and early clinical data indicate that novel agents that selectively target factor XI or factor XII can reduce venous and arterial thrombosis without an increase in bleeding complications.

An Update on Safe Anticoagulation.

Blood coagulation is essential to maintain the integrity of a closed circulatory system (hemostasis), but also contributes to thromboembolic occlusion of vessels (thrombosis). Thrombosis may cause deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, and ischemic stroke, collectively the most common causes of death and disability in the developed world. Treatment for the prevention of thromboembolic diseases using anticoagulants such as heparin, coumarins, thrombin inhibitors, or antiplatelet drugs increase the risk of bleeding and are associated with an increase in potentially life-threatening hemorrhage, partially offsetting the benefits of reduced coagulation. Thus, drug development aiming at novel targets is needed to provide efficient and safe anticoagulation. Within the last decade, experimental and preclinical data have shown that some coagulation mechanisms principally differ in thrombosis and hemostasis. The plasma contact system protein factors XII and XI, high-molecular-weight kininogen, and plasma kallikrein specifically contribute to thrombosis, however, have minor, if any, role in hemostatic coagulation mechanisms. Inherited deficiency in contact system proteins is not associated with increased bleeding in humans and animal models. Therefore, targeting contact system proteins provides the exciting opportunity to interfere specifically with thromboembolic diseases without increasing the bleeding risk. Recent studies that investigated pharmacologic inhibition of contact system proteins have shown that this approach provides efficient and safe thrombo-protection that in contrast to classical anticoagulants is not associated with increased bleeding risk. This review summarizes therapeutic and conceptual developments for selective interference with pathological thrombus formation, while sparing physiologic hemostasis, that enables safe anticoagulation treatment.

Targeting coagulation factor XII as a novel therapeutic option in brain trauma.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury is a major global public health problem for which specific therapeutic interventions are lacking. There is, therefore, a pressing need to identify innovative pathomechanism-based effective therapies for this condition. Thrombus formation in the cerebral microcirculation has been proposed to contribute to secondary brain damage by causing pericontusional ischemia, but previous studies have failed to harness this finding for therapeutic use. The aim of this study was to obtain preclinical evidence supporting the hypothesis that targeting factor XII prevents thrombus formation and has a beneficial effect on outcome after traumatic brain injury. METHODS: We investigated the impact of genetic deficiency of factor XII and acute inhibition of activated factor XII with a single bolus injection of recombinant human albumin-fused infestin-4 (rHA-Infestin-4) on trauma-induced microvascular thrombus formation and the subsequent outcome in 2 mouse models of traumatic brain injury. RESULTS: Our study showed that both genetic deficiency of factor XII and an inhibition of activated factor XII in mice minimize trauma-induced microvascular thrombus formation and improve outcome, as reflected by better motor function, reduced brain lesion volume, and diminished neurodegeneration. Administration of human factor XII in factor XII-deficient mice fully restored injury-induced microvascular thrombus formation and brain damage. INTERPRETATION: The robust protective effect of rHA-Infestin-4 points to a novel treatment option that can decrease ischemic injury after traumatic brain injury without increasing bleeding tendencies. Ann Neurol 2016;79:970-982.

Contact system activation on endothelial cells.

When the contact system assembles and activates on negatively charged surface materials, plasma coagulation rapidly follows. This mechanism is redundant for hemostasis but mediates pathological thrombus formation, as was reported in a multitude of in vivo studies. The epidemiological data are presently scarce to firmly support a role for the contact system in human thrombotic disease, while its physiological function and mode of activation remains mysterious. Besides its role in blood coagulation in vitro, the contact system is responsible for the production of bradykinin. This inflammatory peptide is involved in episodes of pathological tissue swelling in (hereditary) angioedema, but potentially also in the physiological regulation of vascular permeability. A body of evidence indicates that contact system factors are recruited to the surface of activated endothelial cells, where proteins that are locally released can activate them. Furthermore, clinical and biochemical studies indicate that plasmin, the effector enzyme of the fibrinolytic system, can evoke contact system activation. This auxiliary role for plasmin may so far not have been fully appreciated in pathophysiology. To conclude this review, we propose a complementary model for contact system activation on the endothelial cell surface that is initiated by plasmin activity.

[Infected wounds]. / Die infizierte Wunde.

Continuous prophylactic therapy with antibiotics has been used for a long time to try to prevent the step from bacterial contamination to clinical infection of surgical wounds. Earlier results of clinical trials were poor and side-effects common. For those used in recent years, however, the side-effects of pre- or perioperative prophylactic antibiotics have been minimal, although the therapeutical benefits have not yet been proven. This has also been the case with prophylactic infusion of gamma-globulin for prevention of postoperative wound infections.