RESUMO
The juicing industry generates large amounts of waste that mostly lack commercial value and, in the absence of waste treatment policies, produces environmental pollution. Also, microbiological spoilage is a major concern in the wine industry and control tools are limited. Taking these challenges into account, agro-industrial waste coming from ultrafiltrated apple and pear juice were used to grow Saccharomyces eubayanus and to produce its killer toxin (SeKT). A Plackett-Burman screening was performed in order to optimize SeKT production in ultrafiltrated apple and pear juice. The optimized medium was characterized: 75% v/v WUJ, 0.5% m/v KH2PO4, 0.5% m/v MgSO4, 0.5% m/v (NH4)SO4, 0.5% g/L urea, 10% v/v glycerol and 0.1% v/v Triton X-100. SeKT produced in WUJ optimised medium was used to perform killer assays against wine spoilage yeasts and showed antagonistic activity against Brettanomyces bruxellensis, Pichia guilliermondii, Pichia manshurica and Pichia membranifaciens. Different inhibition percentages against spoilage species in a wine environment (49-69%) were detected and preserved for at least 48 h. For the first time, this work reports the ability of S. eubayanus to produce a killer toxin with potential use as a biocontrol tool in winemaking. Producing SeKT using agro-industrial waste as an alternative medium to cultivate S. eubayanus would have industrial, economic and ecological benefits.
Assuntos
Microbiologia Industrial/métodos , Resíduos Industriais/análise , Fatores Matadores de Levedura/metabolismo , Saccharomyces/metabolismo , Vinho/microbiologia , Meios de Cultura/química , Meios de Cultura/metabolismo , Fermentação , Microbiologia Industrial/instrumentação , Fatores Matadores de Levedura/farmacologia , Pichia/efeitos dos fármacos , Pichia/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Saccharomyces/química , Saccharomyces/genética , Resíduos/análiseRESUMO
Killer yeasts are considered potential biocontrol agents to avoid or reduce wine spoilage by undesirable species. In this study two Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (Cf8 and M12) producing killer toxin were partially characterized and new strategies to improve their activity in winemaking were evaluated. Killer toxins were characterized by biochemical tests and growth inhibition of sensitive yeasts. Also genes encoding killer toxin were detected in the chromosomes of both strains by PCR. Both toxins showed optimal activity and production at conditions used during the wine-making process (pH 3.5 and temperatures of 15-25 °C). In addition, production of both toxins was higher when a nitrogen source was added. To improve killer activity different strategies of inoculation were studied, with the sequential inoculation of killer strains the best combination to control the growth of undesired yeasts. Sequential inoculation of Cf8-M12 showed a 45 % increase of killer activity on sensitive S. cerevisiae and spoilage yeasts. In the presence of ethanol (5-12 %) and SO2 (50 mg/L) the killer activity of both toxins was increased, especially for toxin Cf8. Characteristics of both killer strains support their future application as starter cultures and biocontrol agents to produce wines of controlled quality.
Assuntos
Antibiose , Fatores Matadores de Levedura/metabolismo , Controle Biológico de Vetores , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismo , Vinho/microbiologia , DNA Fúngico/química , DNA Fúngico/genética , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Análise de Sequência de DNA , TemperaturaRESUMO
Putative mechanisms of action associated with the biocontrol capacity of four yeast strains (Cryptoccocus albidus NPCC 1248, Pichia membranifaciens NPCC 1250, Cryptoccocus victoriae NPCC 1263 and NPCC 1259) against Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea were studied by means of in vitro and in situ assays. C. albidus(YP), a commercial yeast was also evaluated for comparative purposes. The yeast strains exhibited a variety of different mechanisms including: wound colonization, germination inhibition, biofilm formation, secretion of killer toxins, competition for nutrient and secretion of hydrolytic enzymes (protease, chitinase and glucanase). The relationship between strains (and their associated antagonist mechanisms) and in situ antagonist activity was also evaluated. Results indicate that mechanisms such as production of hydrolytic enzymes, the ability for colonization of wounds, production of killer toxin and inhibition of germination are the most important for biocontrol activity. Our study indicate that multiple modes of action may explain why P. membranifaciens NPCC 1250 and C. victoriae NPCC 1263 provided excellent control of postharvest pears disease.
Assuntos
Agentes de Controle Biológico , Botrytis/fisiologia , Penicillium/fisiologia , Doenças das Plantas/prevenção & controle , Pyrus/microbiologia , Leveduras/fisiologia , Antibiose , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Cryptococcus/fisiologia , Frutas/microbiologia , Hidrolases , Fatores Matadores de Levedura/metabolismo , Pichia/fisiologia , Doenças das Plantas/microbiologiaRESUMO
Killer yeasts are frequently used to combat and prevent contamination by wild-type yeasts during wine production and they can even dominate the wine fermentation. Stuck and sluggish fermentations can be caused by an unbalanced ratio of killer to sensitive yeasts in the bioreactor, and therefore it is important to determine the proportion of both populations. The aim of this study was to provide a simple tool to monitor killer yeast populations during controlled mixed microvinifications of killer and sensitive Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Samples were periodically extracted during vinification, seeded on Petri dishes and incubated at 25 and 37 °C; the latter temperature was assayed for possible inactivation of killer toxin production. Colonies developed under the described conditions were randomly transferred to killer phenotype detection medium. Significant differences in the killer/sensitive ratio were observed between both incubation temperatures in all microvinifications. These results suggest that 37 °C seems a better option to determine the biomass of sensitive yeasts, in order to avoid underestimation of sensitive cells in the presence of killer yeasts during fermentations. Incubation at a toxin-inhibiting temperature clearly showed the real ratio of killer to sensitive cells in fermentation systems.