Cost-Benefit Analysis of Providing Fluoride Varnish in a Pediatric Primary Care Office.

INTRODUCTION: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, among others, call for the provision of fluoride varnish in the pediatric primary care setting, but many barriers exist to the implementation of such a service in this setting. Knowledge of costs and benefits is one such barrier. METHODS: A cost-benefit analysis of the implementation of a fluoride varnish program in a pediatric primary care office located in Volusia County, Florida was conducted with the assistance of the office manager and a nurse practitioner using data retrieved from the electronic health record program. RESULTS: Microsoft Excel was used to calculate estimated mean reimbursement data from the top insurers in this office for this service, and the data show a positive annual net income of $4,498 to $26,775, with an average potential annual net income of $15,637. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this cost-benefit analysis show a positive financial benefit as an incentive to implement a fluoride varnish program in this primary care pediatric office and serve as a solid foundation for a future quality improvement project to implement such a program.

Use of caries prevention tools and associated caries risk in a suburban population of children in Nigeria.

AIMS: To determine the association between use of recommended oral self-care (ROSC) caries prevention tools and presence of dental caries in children resident in suburban Nigeria. METHODOLOGY: Secondary analysis was conducted for a dataset generated for 1-12 years old children recruited through a household survey. Information on use of ROSC caries prevention tools (brushing more than once a day, use of fluoridated toothpaste always, and eating sugary snacks between main meals less than once a day), use of oral health adjuncts (dental floss, mouth rinses, other tooth cleansing agents) and presence of caries were extracted. The odds of having caries when ROSC caries prevention tools were used singly or in combination, were determined using multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: The single or combined use of ROSC caries prevention tools had no statistically significant association with presence of caries. Brushing more than once a day reduced the odds of having caries while consumption of sugar between meals once a day or more increased the odds of having caries after adjusting for age and gender. The use of two ROSC caries prevention tools reduced the risk for caries (AOR 0.28; 95 % CI 0.05-1.53) when adjusted for age. The converse was observed when adjusted for gender (AOR 1.15; 95 % CI 0.38-3.45). The largest effect size was observed when sugary snacks were taken once a day or more between meals after adjusting for age (AOR 5.74; 95 % CI 0.34-96.11). CONCLUSION: The use of a combination of fluoridated toothpaste and twice-daily tooth brushing had the largest effect on reducing the chance for caries in children resident in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Design of an innovative paediatric capitation payment approach for public sector dentistry: an Australian experience.

AIM: The aim of this study was to trial the methodology and administration processes of a public paediatric capitation programme provided in the period 1 July 2011 to 31 December 2011 through a Bachelor of Oral Health programme in rural New South Wales (NSW), Australia, where access to public dental services is limited. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: The principal structure of the programme was the development of three diagnostic pathways: active caries and pain (Pathway A); active caries and no pain (Pathway B); and no active caries and no pain (Pathway C). In 2011, de-identified treatment data for NSW public dental services' patients under 18 years of age were analysed to identify the top 10 dental treatment items. These items were clustered according to the mean decayed and/or filled surface of patients under 18 years of age who had decayed, filled or missing teeth. Each treatment item was allocated 60% of the 2011 Australian Government Department of Veteran Affairs Schedule of Fees. CLINICAL SETTING: The programme was trialled in Charles Sturt University dental facility in Wagga Wagga, NSW. PARTICIPANTS: The programme targeted patients in the following age groups: 0-5 years; 6-11 years; and 12-17 years. RESULT: The 6-month trial provided 361 patients with a capitation pathway, at a total cost of $47,567.90, averaging $131.76 per capitation pathway. The total number of items provided (n=2,070) equated to an average of 5.7 items per capitation diagnostic pathway. CONCLUSION: This model offered an early entry point for paediatric patients to access dental care that addressed their needs, whilst being flexible enough to be fiscally attractive.

A retrospective analysis of caries treatment and development in relation to assessed caries risk in an adult population in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: The Public Dental Service of Västerbotten County (Sweden) recommends using population-based prevention strategies combined with an individual strategy for high-risk patients to manage caries. To facilitate this management strategy, all patients are evaluated for their risk of developing caries in the coming year using defined criteria. Using caries risk scoring over a seven-year period, the present study evaluates prophylactic measures, caries development, and non-operative treatments in adult patients. METHODS: From all adult patients (25-65 years; n = 76 320) scored with a high caries risk in 2005 (baseline) and with a dental visit in 2011, 200 subjects were randomly selected. In addition, an equally sized control group with a no/low caries risk was selected. Information concerning dental status, counselling, treatments, visits, and costs were retrieved from dental records. RESULTS: Over the seven-year study period, subjects with high caries risk had significantly higher caries incidence in spite of shorter recall intervals, more dental appointments, and higher costs for dental care than subjects with no/low caries risk. Non-operative measures, such as additional fluoride and individual counselling on diet at baseline (2005), was higher in the high caries risk group, whereas information about basic prophylaxis and counselling on oral hygiene showed only small differences. The frequency of non-operative measures given during the seven-year study period to patients in the high caries risk group is considered to be remarkably low and improvement, determined as reclassification from high to no/low caries risk from 2005 to 2011, was seen in only 13% of the participants. CONCLUSIONS: This study formulated two major conclusions. First, adult patients with high or no/low caries represent different populations, that each contain distinct subpopulations, those who improve/impair or maintained their caries risk and disease progression. These groups need different strategies in disease treatment. Second, preventive measures and non-operative treatments were associated with improvements in caries risk and maintenance, but the extent to which such treatments were given to high caries risk subjects was unacceptably low. Improved adherence to the guidelines for caries treatment may reduce caries risk, visits to dental clinics, and costs for the patients.

Performing oral health screenings on children.

This article describes ways to elicit the cooperation of a young patient while limiting fear and/or alarm, provides steps for performing a complete oral exam to evaluate the oral health of a child, and discusses reimbursement for the application of fluoride varnish.

Modeling an economic evaluation of a salt fluoridation program in Peru.

OBJECTIVE: This article models the cost-effectiveness, from a societal viewpoint, of a dental caries prevention program using salt fluoridation for children 12 years of age, compared with non-intervention (or status quo) in Arequipa, Peru. METHODS: Standard cost-effectiveness analysis methods were used. The costs associated with implementing and operating the salt-fluoridation program were identified and measured using 2009 prices. Health outcomes were measured as dental caries averted over a 6-year period. Clinical effectiveness data was taken from published data. Costs were measured as direct treatment costs, programs costs and costs of productivity losses as a result of dental treatments. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. A hypothetical population of 25,000 12-year-olds living in Arequipa, Peru was used in this analysis. Two-way sensitivity analyses were conducted over a range of values for key parameters. RESULTS: Our primary analysis estimated that if a dental caries prevention program using salt-fluoridation was available for 25,000 6-year-old children for 6 years, the net saving from a societal perspective would total S/. 11.95 [1 US$ = S/. (2009) 3.01] per diseased tooth averted when compared with the status quo group. That is, after 6 years, an investment of S/.0.32 per annum per child would result in a net saving of S/.11.95 per decayed/missing/filled teeth prevented. CONCLUSIONS: While the analysis has inherent limitations as a result of its reliance on a range of assumptions, the findings indicate that for the situations prevailing in Peru, there are significant health and economic benefits to be gained from the use of salt fluoridation.

Cost-effectiveness of an experimental caries-control regimen in a 3.4-yr randomized clinical trial among 11-12-yr-old Finnish schoolchildren.

The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of an experimental caries-control regimen in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) conducted in Pori, Finland, in 2001-2005. Children (n = 497) who were 11-12 yr of age and had at least one active initial caries lesion at baseline were studied. The children in the experimental group (n = 250) were offered an individually designed patient-centered regimen for caries control. The children in the control group (n = 247) received standard dental care. Furthermore, the whole population was exposed to continuous community-level oral health promotion. Individual costs of treatment procedures and outcomes (DMFS increment score) for the follow-up period of 3.4 yr were calculated for each child in both groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was euro 34.07 per averted DMF surface. The experimental regimen was more effective, and also more costly. However, the total costs decreased year after year, and for the last 2 yr the experimental regimen was less expensive than the standard dental care. The experimental regimen would probably have been more cost-effective than standard dental care if the follow-up period had been longer, the regimen less comprehensive, and/or if dental nurses had conducted the preventive procedures.

Modelling lifelong costs of caries with and without fluoride use.

Cost-benefit or cost-cost analyses are becoming increasingly important in dentistry. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the economic consequences of caries prevention with fluorides. German epidemiological data were used in a system dynamics model to assess the lifelong costs of caries in a population. Without fluoride prevention, lifelong treatment for caries resulted in mean costs of 6,976 euro and a present value of 932 euro per person (5% discounting). In different scenarios of constant, increasing, or decreasing caries-controlling effects, and of limited (age 6-18 yr) or lifelong application, the combination of fluoride salt, fluoride toothpaste, and fluoride gel were most cost-effective. They reduced the costs for caries treatment and prophylaxis to 482, euro or to a present value of 148 euro (5% discounting), when applied from age 6-18 yr, and to 211-213 euro for lifelong use (present value, 5% discounting). In conclusion, a lifelong model of costs of caries demonstrates that the use of fluorides in caries prevention is highly cost-effective.

Implementation of a Basic Package of Oral Care: towards a reorientation of dental Ngos and their volunteers.

Dental NGOs and volunteers working in disadvantaged communities around the world do so with the best of intentions and with high motivation. Regrettably, the impact of this engagement on oral health at the population level remains rather low. This is mainly due to the choice of inappropriate approaches, the failure to integrate their projects within existing health care systems and the lack of sustainability. This paper proposes the concept of the Basic Package of Oral Care (BPOC) as a guiding framework for dental NGO and volunteer activities. The main components of the BPOC (Oral Urgent Treatment, Affordable Fluoride Toothpaste, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment) offer many opportunities for effective, affordable and sustainable activities that aim to improve oral health on the community and population level. Only through a reorientation of dental volunteer services and NGOs towards new roles and activities can a sustained impact on global oral health be possible. Recommendations are given that could help dental NGOs and volunteers in this process of change.

Cost aspects of salt fluoridation.

The cost of salt fluoridation in a given country depends primarily on the number of salt factories and on the technical level available in the country. Equipment required may cost U.S. dollars 400,000 for large plants producing at least 20,000 tons/year providing salt for populations of several millions. Reliable batch mixers have been built locally for U.S. dollars 3000 to U.S. dollars 10,000, with one such mixer capable of producing 10 batches of one metric ton/day or 2000 to 3000 tons a year for a population of 350,000 to 500,000. Frequently 85-90% of the costs are devoted to infrastructure; in combination with salt iodization, the cost for fluoride equipment is 30-50% less. loIization is promoted by WHO, UNICEF, other international organizations and national aid agencies which can indirectly support salt fluoridation. With respect to running costs, the expense for the fluoride chemical is the major factor in small plants producing for example 6000 tons of salt, i. e U.S. dollars 0.015 to 0.03 per year and capita. The cost for personnel necessary for addition of fluoride and quality control is approximately U.S. dollars 0.008/capita/year in small plants and even less in large ones. With adequate implementation, salt fluoridation affords a cariostatic effectiveness equal to that of water fluoridation. When its cost is compared to that of water fluoridation, there may not be much difference regarding initial cost for equipment except in the case of small salt factories where local production of batch mixers may lower initial expenses substantially. Running costs for salt fluoridation are 10 to 100 times lower because the amount of fluoride chemical needed and its handling are up to 100 times less than with water fluoridation. In practice, the cost of salt fluoridation is often so low that many producers did not raise the price of fluoridated salt; this has been the case in Switzerland since 1955 and also in several countries in the Americas today.

Salt fluoridation in Central and Eastern Europe.

For decades Central European countries have been interested in preventive dentistry. Water fluoridation played a major role in the former German Democratic and Czechoslovak Republics and a minor one in Poland. These schemes were abandoned after 1989. Extensive research on all aspects of salt fluoridation was conducted in Hungary from 1966 to 1984 but attempts to introduce it in the country have had little success. Salt fluoridation was implemented in the Czech and the Slovak Republics in the mid-nineties. The market share of the fluoridated domestic salt appears to have reached 35% in the Czech Republic; it became eventually part of a preventive strategy comprising school-based dental health education including topical fluoride. Another four countries have been considering salt fluoridation but schemes did not materialize. Antifluoridation activities occasionally impeded caries prevention, and for years some respected dentists declared their position against fluorides. Caries prevalence in 12-year-old children is by 1 to 3 DMFT higher than in Western Europe. For many years to come, modern fluoride-containing toothpastes and dentifrices may not be affordable for the lower socio-economic strata of the populations in Central and Eastern Europe. It is concluded that salt fluoridation, which is by far the cheapest means of lowering caries prevalence, could markedly improve the oral health situation even if the economical situation is slow to improve.

A cost-benefit analysis of an advocacy project to fluoridate toothpastes in Nepal.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to provide a limited cost-benefit analysis of a health promotion project based on advocacy to increase the availability and consumption of fluoride toothpaste. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: The cost-benefit analysis method uses the cost-of-illness approach to analyse the costs and benefits of the health promotion project. SETTING: The setting for the health promotion project was the country of Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: A sub-set of the population (6-18 year-olds) was used to compute the financial burden of treating projected caries in the permanent dentition. INTERVENTIONS: The paper compares the projected effect of fluoride toothpaste versus non-fluoride toothpaste on the financial burden of dental caries for a sub-set of the Nepali population over a period of 6 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: The net present value (NPV) and the benefit-cost ratio are the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Over a period of 6 years the NPV was US dollar 594,466 for a projected 10% reduction in dental caries of this population group as a result of fluoridation of toothpastes: US dollar 1,035,640 for a projected 20% reduction; and US dollar 2,442,333 for a projected 40% reduction in caries increment. For every US dollar 1 spent on the advocacy project to increase the availability and consumption of fluoride toothpaste, there is a potential saving in the direct cost of treating caries ranging from US dollar 87 to US dollar 356. CONCLUSIONS: The cost benefit analysis presented shows the project was efficient. Tangible benefits resulting from the intervention of fluoride toothpaste were quantified as well as the risks from having no intervention.

[Fluoridation of drinking water, why is it needed?].

BACKGROUND: Dental caries is a widespread disease. It causes irreversible damage, pain and considerable expense. Fluoride is the only known substance that raises the tooth's resistance to acid attack. Natural drinking waters contain fluoride at different concentration. The most effective method of fluoride administration to the community level is by adjustng the fluoride concentration in the drinking water to about 1 part per million. AIM: To describe the mode of action of fluoride, methods of administration and to describe water fluoridation, advantages and disadvantages. RESULTS: Fluoridation of drinking water started in 1945 in the world and in 1981 in Israel. Today more then 300 million people in some 60 countries enjoy the defending effect of fluoride in drinking water. This is the most effective method for decreasing incidence of caries, as well as being cost effective. Over the years there were many attempts to 'blame' fluoridation with negative side effects to human health. Till today, none of the allegations passed scientific scrutiny. CONCLUSIONS: There is overwhelming scientific support for the Regulations that oblige the Water supplier to adjust fluoride levels to 1 ppm in every town or municipality with more then 5,000 inhabitants.

An assessment of the cost effectiveness of a postal toothpaste programme to prevent caries among five-year-old children in the North West of England.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of a postal toothpaste programme to prevent caries in 5-year-old children in the north west of England. PARTICIPANTS: Birth cohorts of children aged 12 months were recruited from high caries risk populations in nine health districts. DESIGN: The results of a randomised controlled trial to measure the effects of a postal toothpaste programme are used and related to the costs of running a similar programme. Children in the trial received free toothpaste on four occasions a year and a toothbrush once a year for four years from age 12 months to 5 years. When aged 5-6 years children were examined by trained, calibrated examiners using BASCD standards. Those who received toothpaste containing 1450 ppm F were found to have a significantly lower mean dmft than those who had not. The costs that would be incurred by a public dental service running such a postal toothpaste programme are identified, measured and related to the likely health improvement that could be achieved. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cost per tooth saved and the cost per child saved from caries experience and extraction experience. RESULTS: The estimated cost per tooth saved from carious attack was pounds sterling 80.83 and the cost per child of preventing caries experience was pounds sterling 424.38 and avoiding any extractions was pounds sterling 679.01. Analysis resulted in an overestimation of costs and underestimation of benefits. CONCLUSION: The programme achieved a significant caries reduction in children who received the 1450 ppm F toothpaste and the costs are now available to those considering provision of treatment services in areas where children are at high caries risk.

Cost-effectiveness of different caries preventive measures in a high-risk population of Swedish adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: A total of 3373 12-year-olds agreed to participate in an intervention study evaluating different caries preventive measures. The study, titled 'Evaluation of caries preventive measures', was performed between 1995 and 1999 at 26 dental health clinics throughout Sweden. At the start of the study, the subjects were classified as individuals at high or low risk of developing caries. The high-risk group consisted of 1165 subjects. The children in the high-risk group were randomly assigned to one of four preventive programs. The programs represent a step-wise increase in fluoride content, contact with dental personnel and cost. The aim of the present cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) study performed from a societal perspective is to compare costs and consequences of caries preventive programs in a caries high-risk population. By 'costs' is meant both treatment costs and costs contributed by the patient and the patient's family. Costs contributed by patients and their families consist of out-of-pocket expenses, transportation costs, and time. Conclusions are that it is important to consider the perspective from which a study is carried out. Costs contributed by the patient and the patient's family have a high impact on total costs for children and younger adolescents but decrease with time as the adolescents get older. The present study shows an incremental cost-effectiveness of 2043 SEK (8.54 SEK = 1 US dollar, December 1999) per averted decayed enamel and dentine missing and filled surface (DeMFS), of which treatment costs represent 1337 SEK using the unit cost for a nurse. This means a yearly cost of approximately 334 SEK.

Economic evaluation of dental caries prevention: a systematic review.

The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of economic evaluations of caries prevention. A search in Medline from 1966 until May 2003 and a manual search in a number of journals identified 154 references, 74 of which were included. There were 17 original studies including an economic evaluation, and these form the basis of the present article. The rest were reviews, model studies and reports concerning economic practice in dentistry. The results show that the reviewed original studies on economic evaluation of caries prevention do not provide support for the economic value of caries prevention. The scarcity of well-conducted studies, as well as contradictory evidence in the reviewed articles, makes it difficult to judge the health-economic effect of the studied caries-prevention methods.

School milk as a vehicle for fluoride in the United Kingdom. An interim report.

OBJECTIVE: To consider the feasibility of using school milk as a vehicle to deliver fluoride to children, suffering from high rates of dental disease, in socially deprived districts. METHOD: The legal aspects of adding fluoride to milk and availability of milk subsidies were updated. The organisational requirements of using school milk as a vehicle for fluoride were investigated and the consultation process established. The uptake of fluoridated milk was monitored and the fluoridated milk was subjected to rigorous quality control. The costs involved in running a scheme were calculated. OUTCOME: Fluoridated milk can now be called milk with added fluoride and to date the product has attracted subsidies from the European Economic Community and from the Welfare Foods Section in the Department of Health. The demonstration scheme in St. Helens, Merseyside, generated interest from neighbouring health authorities leading to the subsequent expansion of the programme. By working with the dairy, recommendations to improve the quality of school milk have been developed. The main organisations involved in running school based milk fluoridation schemes have been encouraged by the low costs involved. CONCLUSION: The UK programme has demonstrated that it is feasible to use school milk as a vehicle to deliver fluoride on a community basis. Attention must be given to improving the quality and particularly the temperature control of school milk.

An economic evaluation of community water fluoridation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to assess the local cost savings resulting from community water fluoridation, given current exposure levels to other fluoride sources. METHODS: Adopting a societal perspective and using a discount rate of 4 percent, we compared the annual per person cost of fluoridation with the cost of averted disease and productivity losses. The latter was the product of annual dental caries increment in nonfluoridated communities, fluoridation effectiveness, and the discounted lifetime cost of treating a carious tooth surface. We obtained or imputed all parameters from published studies and national surveys. We conducted one-way and three-way sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: With base-case assumptions, the annual per person cost savings resulting from fluoridation ranged from $15.95 in very small communities to $18.62 in large communities. Fluoridation was still cost saving for communities of any size if we allowed increment, effectiveness, or the discount rate to take on their worst-case values, individually. For simultaneous variation of variables, fluoridation was cost saving for all but very small communities. There, fluoridation was cost saving if the reduction in carious surfaces attributable to one year of fluoridation was at least 0.046. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the most current data available on the effectiveness and cost of fluoridation, caries increment, and the cost and longevity of dental restorations, we find that water fluoridation offers significant cost savings.