Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.

Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies (VFSS) are instrumental assessments of dysphagia which provide videos of the internal structures of swallowing. They are commonly regarded as 'gold-standard' assessments; however, there is no consensus regarding a gold-standard measure to analyse the video recordings that they produce. Measures require sound psychometric properties to be suitable for clinical or research purposes. To date, no review of psychometric properties of FEES and VFSS measures has been undertaken or formally reported. This review assessed the quality of the psychometric properties of visuoperceptual measures of FEES and VFSS. Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting on psychometric qualities of visuoperceptual measures which are used to analyse recordings from FEES and VFSS. All dates until February 2017 were included. The Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to evaluate the methodical quality of studies. The measures' overall quality was then assessed by combining COSMIN ratings with quality criteria. Forty-five studies, reporting on 39 measures, met the inclusion criteria for this review. Data about the measures' psychometric properties were very limited. Twenty-one measures had information available about reliability only, while 18 had information on up to five of the possible nine psychometric properties categorised within the COSMIN framework. The majority of the FEES and VFSS measures' psychometric properties were rated as 'indeterminate' overall, due to the small number of studies, issues with design, statistical analyses, and reporting practices of extant studies. There is insufficient evidence to recommend any individual measure included in this review as valid and reliable to interpret VFSS and FEES recordings. Further research, which utilises robust methodological design and reporting, is needed to examine the psychometric properties of measures for FEES and VFSS.

Patient satisfaction with residents vs attending following fluoroscopy-guided pain injections.

OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction has been the object of interest in health care for some time and is now increasingly used as the basis for quality management and improvement. This study compares patient satisfaction between residents and attending in a pain clinic setting following fluoroscopy-guided steroid injections. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort design study. SETTING: The study was performed at an academic university pain management center. SUBJECTS: A total of 242 patients (119 female and 123 male) presenting with low back pain were evaluated and offered fluoroscopically guided steroid injections as part of a conservative care treatment plan. INTERVENTIONS: All injections were performed consecutively over a 4-month period by one attending and three senior residents (two anesthesia and one psychiatry resident). A staff member specifically asked each participant about their satisfaction following the procedure. Answers were documented as "Expected,""Better," or "Worse" than expected. OUTCOME MEASURES: Two main outcome measures were recorded: 1) table and fluoroscopy time for residents and attending, and 2) patient satisfaction through subjective reporting. RESULTS: Overall, residents had longer mean table time and mean fluoroscopy time as compared with the attending physician (P < 0.05). Patients treated by residents were more often likely to rate their experience as "worse" compared with those treated by the attending (P < 0.05). Otherwise, the proportion of patients rating their experience "as expected" or "better" was not significantly different statistically between the two groups. In addition, as table time increased, satisfaction level decreased in both resident and attending groups. CONCLUSION: Patients treated by residents are more likely to rate their experience as worse compared with the attending. However, majority of patients in both groups were satisfied in that they perceived their procedure as expected or better than expected.

Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of traumatically induced cervical spondylotic radicular pain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes resulting from the use of fluoroscopically guided therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of traumatically induced cervical spondylotic radicular pain. DESIGN: Retrospective study with independent clinical review. A total of 15 patients who met specific physical examination or electrodiagnostic criteria and failed to improve clinically after at least 4 wks of physical therapy were included. Each patient demonstrated a positive response to a fluoroscopically guided cervical selective nerve root block. Therapeutic selective nerve root blocks were administered in conjunction with physical therapy. Outcome measures included visual analog scale pain scores, employment status, medication usage, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Patients' symptom duration before diagnostic injection averaged 13.0 mos. An average of 3.7 therapeutic injections were administered. Follow-up data collection transpired at an average of 20.7 mos after discharge from treatment. An overall good or excellent outcome was observed in three patients (20.0%). Among those treated without surgery, a significant reduction (P = 0.0313) in pain score was observed at the time of follow-up. Six patients (40.0%) proceeded to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These initial and preliminary findings do not support the use of therapeutic selective nerve root block in the treatment of this challenging patient population with traumatically induced spondylotic radicular pain.

Gray ramus communicans nerve block: novel treatment approach for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is a common complication of osteoporosis in the aging population. Refractory chronic pain may develop, and few effective treatment options exist. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 52 cases in which gray ramus communicans nerve block was used for painful OVCF after failure of conservative analgesic therapy. All were office-based, fluoroscopically guided procedures; a combination of 2% lidocaine and 2% sterile triamcinolone diacetate (Aristocort) was injected on the gray ramus tract of the somatic nerve root corresponding with radiographically documented OVCF. Patient-reported and physician-reported pain scores, analgesic medication use, and overall patient satisfaction were measured. The average follow-up period was 9 months. RESULTS: A 1-point improvement in pain scores was reported by 92% of patients and 88% of physicians; a 4-point improvement was reported by 63% and 58%, respectively. No patients reported increased pain scores; physicians reported increases in two cases. Decreased analgesic requirement was documented in 42%. Patient satisfaction was "high" in 50% and "medium" in 25%. No procedural complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Prompt and sustained improvements in all parameters, especially pain scores, support widespread clinical application of this safe effective and cost-effective therapy.