Nurses' internal contamination by antineoplastic drugs in hospital centers: a cross-sectional descriptive study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess internal antineoplastic drugs (ADs) contamination in the nursing staff in French hospital centers, using highly sensitive analytical methods. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included nurses practicing in care departments where at least one of the five ADs studied was handled (5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, methotrexate). The nurses study participation lasted 24 h including collection of three urine samples and one self-questionnaire. All urine samples were assayed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods with very low value of the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). RESULTS: 74 nurses were included, 222 urine samples and 74 self-questionnaires were collected; 1092 urine assays were performed. The percentage of nurses with internal AD contamination was 60.8% and low levels of urinary concentrations were measured. Regarding nurses with internal contamination (n = 45), 42.2% presented internal contamination by methotrexate, 37.8% by cyclophosphamide, 33.3% by ifosfamide, 17.8% by 5-fluorouracil metabolite and 6.7% by doxorubicine. Among the positive assays, 17.9% (n = 26/145) were not explained by exposure data from the self-questionnaire but this could be due to the skin contact of nurses with contaminated work surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: This study reported high percentage of nurses with internal ADs contamination. The low LLOQ values of the used analytical methods, allowed the detection of ADs that would not have been detected with the current published methods: the percentage of contamination would have been 17.6% instead of the 60.8% reported here. Pending toxicological reference values, urine ADs concentrations should be reduced as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA principle).

Study protocol for the assessment of nurses internal contamination by antineoplastic drugs in hospital centres: a cross-sectional multicentre descriptive study.

INTRODUCTION: Antineoplastic drugs (AD) are potentially carcinogenic and/or reprotoxic molecules. Healthcare professionals are increasingly exposed to these drugs and can be potentially contaminated by them. Internal contamination of professionals is a key concern for occupational physicians in the assessment and management of occupational risks in healthcare settings. Objectives of this study are to report AD internal contamination rate in nursing staff and to identify factors associated with internal contamination. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial will be conducted in two French hospital centres: University Hospital of Bordeaux and IUCT-Oncopole of Toulouse. The target population is nurses practicing in one of the fifteen selected care departments where at least one of the five studied AD is handled (5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, methotrexate). The trial will be conducted with the following steps: (1) development of analytical methods to quantify AD urine biomarkers, (2) study of the workplace and organization around AD in each care department (transport and handling, professional practices, personal and collective protection equipments available) (3) development of a self-questionnaire detailing professional activities during the day of inclusion, (4) nurses inclusion (urine samples and self-questionnaire collection), (5) urine assays, (6) data analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the French Advisory Committee on the Treatment of Information in Health Research (CCTIRS) and by the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL). Following the opinion of the Regional Committee for the Protection of Persons, this study is outside the scope of the provisions governing biomedical research and routine care (n°2014/87). The results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and reported at suitable national and international meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03137641.

Antineoplastic drug occupational exposure: a new integrated approach to evaluate exposure and early genotoxic and cytotoxic effects by no-invasive Buccal Micronucleus Cytome Assay biomarker.

Health-care personnel handling antineoplastic drugs could be at risk for adverse health effects. We aimed to evaluate genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of antineoplastic drug exposure of personnel preparing and administering such drugs in three Oncology Hospitals in Italy enrolling 42 exposed subjects and 53 controls. Furthermore, we aimed to study the possible influence of XRCC1 and hOGG1 DNA repair genes polymorphisms on genotoxicity induced on buccal cells. We performed workplace and personal monitoring of some drugs and used exposure diary informations to characterize the exposure. Urinary 5-FU metabolite (α-fluoro-ß-alanine) was measured. Buccal Micronucleus Cytome (BMCyt) assay was used to evaluate DNA damage and other cellular anomalies. GEM and 5-FU contamination was found in 68% and 42% of wipe/swab samples respectively. GEM deposition was found on workers' pads while no α-fluoro-ß-alanine was found. BMCyt-assay showed higher genotoxicity and cytotoxicity on nurses administering antineoplastics than on preparators and controls. Among micronucleus (MN) positive (with MN frequency higher than 1.5‰) exposed subjects, the percentage of those carrying XRCC1 mut/het genotype was higher than in MN positive-controls. Using the sensitive BMCyt assay, we demonstrated that handling antineoplastics still represents a potential occupational health risk for workers that should be better trained/informed regarding such risks.

Biomonitoring of occupational exposure to 5-FU by assaying α-fluoro-ß-alanine in urine with a highly sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most widely used antineoplastic drugs handled by healthcare professionals (HCP). To monitor occupational exposure to 5-FU, a highly sensitive ESI-UHPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the assay of its main human metabolite, α-fluoro-ß-alanine (FBAL), in urine. After a derivatization step, solid phase extraction was used for the urine. Good linearity (r > 0.996), precision (CV < 14.76%), and accuracy (bias < 12.16%) were achieved. The lower limit of quantification (LOQ), 20 pg ml-1, is the lowest one published to date. Seven urine samples from 73 HCP exposed to 5FU were positive for FBAL, indicating 5FU contamination (9.6%). FBAL urine concentrations ranged from 25 to 301 pg ml-1. Such an efficient analytical tool combining high specificity with high sensitivity is essential for the reliable detection and routine biological monitoring of healthcare professionals occupationally exposed to this widely used antineoplastic drug. This method allows biomonitoring of occupational exposure to 5-fluorouracil in a routine manner, with the aim of assessing the effectiveness of collective and individual protective measures.

Closed-system drug-transfer devices plus safe handling of hazardous drugs versus safe handling alone for reducing exposure to infusional hazardous drugs in healthcare staff.

BACKGROUND: Occupational exposure to hazardous drugs can decrease fertility and result in miscarriages, stillbirths, and cancers in healthcare staff. Several recommended practices aim to reduce this exposure, including protective clothing, gloves, and biological safety cabinets ('safe handling'). There is significant uncertainty as to whether using closed-system drug-transfer devices (CSTD) in addition to safe handling decreases the contamination and risk of staff exposure to infusional hazardous drugs compared to safe handling alone. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of closed-system drug-transfer of infusional hazardous drugs plus safe handling versus safe handling alone for reducing staff exposure to infusional hazardous drugs and risk of staff contamination. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, OSH-UPDATE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index Expanded, economic evaluation databases, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov to October 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included comparative studies of any study design (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) that compared CSTD plus safe handling versus safe handling alone for infusional hazardous drugs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently identified trials and extracted data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using both fixed-effect and random-effects models. We assessed risk of bias according to the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, used an intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.10, and we assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 23 observational cluster studies (358 hospitals) in this review. We did not find any randomised controlled trials or formal economic evaluations. In 21 studies, the people who used the intervention (CSTD plus safe handling) and control (safe handling alone) were pharmacists or pharmacy technicians; in the other two studies, the people who used the intervention and control were nurses, pharmacists, or pharmacy technicians. The CSTD used in the studies were PhaSeal (13 studies), Tevadaptor (1 study), SpikeSwan (1 study), PhaSeal and Tevadaptor (1 study), varied (5 studies), and not stated (2 studies). The studies' descriptions of the control groups were varied. Twenty-one studies provide data on one or more outcomes for this systematic review. All the studies are at serious risk of bias. The quality of evidence is very low for all the outcomes.There is no evidence of differences in the proportion of people with positive urine tests for exposure between the CSTD and control groups for cyclophosphamide alone (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.52; I² = 12%; 2 studies; 2 hospitals; 20 participants; CSTD: 76.1% versus control: 91.7%); cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.00 to 2.79; 1 study; 1 hospital; 14 participants; CSTD: 6.4% versus control: 71.4%); and cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, or gemcitabine (RR not estimable; 1 study; 1 hospital; 36 participants; 0% in both groups).There is no evidence of a difference in the proportion of surface samples contaminated in the pharmacy areas or patient-care areas for any of the drugs except 5-fluorouracil, which was lower in the CSTD group than in the control (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.97; 3 studies, 106 hospitals, 1008 samples; CSTD: 9% versus control: 13.9%).The amount of cyclophosphamide was lower in pharmacy areas in the CSTD group than in the control group (MD -49.34 pg/cm², 95% CI -84.11 to -14.56, I² = 0%, 7 studies; 282 hospitals, 1793 surface samples). Additionally, one interrupted time-series study (3 hospitals; 342 samples) demonstrated a change in the slope between pre-CSTD and CSTD (3.9439 pg/cm², 95% CI 1.2303 to 6.6576; P = 0.010), but not between CSTD and post-CSTD withdrawal (-1.9331 pg/cm², 95% CI -5.1260 to 1.2598; P = 0.20). There is no evidence of difference in the amount of the other drugs between CSTD and control groups in the pharmacy areas or patient-care areas.None of the studies report on atmospheric contamination, blood tests, or other measures of exposure to infusional hazardous drugs such as urine mutagenicity, chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, or micronuclei induction.None of the studies report short-term health benefits such as reduction in skin rashes, medium-term reproductive health benefits such as fertility and parity, or long-term health benefits related to the development of any type of cancer or adverse events.Five studies (six hospitals) report the potential cost savings through the use of CSTD. The studies used different methods of calculating the costs, and the results were not reported in a format that could be pooled via meta-analysis. There is significant variability between the studies in terms of whether CSTD resulted in cost savings (the point estimates of the average potential cost savings ranged from (2017) USD -642,656 to (2017) USD 221,818). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence to support or refute the routine use of closed-system drug transfer devices in addition to safe handling of infusional hazardous drugs, as there is no evidence of differences in exposure or financial benefits between CSTD plus safe handling versus safe handling alone (very low-quality evidence). None of the studies report health benefits.Well-designed multicentre randomised controlled trials may be feasible depending upon the proportion of people with exposure. The next best study design is interrupted time-series. This design is likely to provide a better estimate than uncontrolled before-after studies or cross-sectional studies. Future studies may involve other alternate ways of reducing exposure in addition to safe handling as one intervention group in a multi-arm parallel design or factorial design trial. Future studies should have designs that decrease the risk of bias and enable measurement of direct health benefits in addition to exposure. Studies using exposure should be tested for a relevant selection of hazardous drugs used in the hospital to provide an estimate of the exposure and health benefits of using CSTD. Steps should be undertaken to ensure that there are no other differences between CSTD and control groups, so that one can obtain a reasonable estimate of the health benefits of using CSTD.

Antineoplastic drug residues inside homes of chemotherapy patients.

Chemotherapy treatment of cancer patients has shifted from inpatient to outpatient administration. Thus, family members are potentially exposed to cytotoxic drug residues from patients' excretions inside their homes. The study's aim was to evaluate the surface contamination and the potential uptake of antineoplastic drug residues by family members at home of chemotherapy patients. Overall, 265 wipe samples from 13 homes were taken at two times after chemotherapy from different surfaces (toilet, bathroom, kitchen). 62 urine samples were collected from patients and family members on three days. Samples were analyzed for cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil (urine: FBAL) and platinum (as marker for cis-, carbo- and oxaliplatin). Substantial contamination was found on every surface type (PT: 0.02-42.5pg/cm2, 5-FU: ND-98.3pg/cm2, CP: ND-283.3pg/cm2) with highest concentrations on toilet and bathroom surfaces. While patients' urinary drug concentrations often were elevated for more than 48h after administration, no drug residues were detectable in the family members' urine. This study provided an insight in the exposure situation against antineoplastic drug residues at home of chemotherapy patients. As contamination could be found on various surfaces adequate hygienic and protective measures are necessary to minimize the exposure risk for cohabitants.

Electrochemical behavior of an anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil at methylene blue modified carbon paste electrode.

A novel sensor for the determination of 5-fluorouracil was constructed by electrochemical deposition of methylene blue on surface of carbon paste electrode. The electrode surface morphology was studied using Atomic force microscopy and XRD. The electrochemical activity of modified electrode was characterized using cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse method. The developed sensor shows impressive enlargement in sensitivity of 5-fluorouracil determination. The peak currents obtained from differential pulse voltammetry was linear with concentration of 5-fluorouracil in the range 4×10(-5)-1×10(-7)M and detection limit and quantification limit were calculated to be 2.04nM and 6.18nM respectively. Further, the sensor was successfully applied in pharmaceutical and biological fluid sample analysis.

Exposure of family members to antineoplastic drugs via excreta of treated cancer patients.

PURPOSES: (a) To measure the urinary excretion of antineoplastic drugs of three patients during 48 h after the administration of cyclophosphamide (two patients) and 5-fluorouracil (one patient). (b) To evaluate environmental contamination with antineoplastic drugs via excreta of patients in the home setting. (c) To evaluate exposure of family members to antineoplastic drugs by measuring the drugs in their urine during the 48 h after completion of the chemotherapy by the patients. METHODS: Two patients were administered cyclophosphamide by i.v. bolus injection. One patient was administered 5-fluorouracil by i.v. bolus injection and thereafter immediately administered the same drug by continuous infusion for 46 h. Urine samples from the patients administered cyclophosphamide and their family members, and wipe samples from their home environment, were analysed for the unchanged form of cyclophosphamide. For 5-fluorouracil, the urine samples from the patient and the family member were analysed for the 5-fluorouracil metabolite α-fluoro-ß-alanine. Wipe samples were analysed for 5-fluorouracil. Drugs were detected and quantified with gas chromatography in tandem with mass spectroscopy-mass spectroscopy or by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet-light detection. RESULTS: A total of 35 and 16 urine samples were collected from the three patients and their family members, respectively. The drugs were detected in all samples. Cyclophosphamide was detected at levels of 0.03-7.34 ng/cm(2) in 8 of the 12 wipe samples obtained from the homes of the patients administered cyclophosphamide. For the patient administered 5-fluorouracil, drug levels in his home environment were below the limit of detection. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated contamination of the home setting and exposure of family members to cyclophosphamide via the excreta of outpatient receiving chemotherapy. Exposure of the family member of the patient administered 5-fluorouracil was also demonstrated. These findings indicate the importance of strict precautions by the members of treated cancer patients as well as healthcare workers, to reduce the risk of exposure to antineoplastic drugs.

[Pharmacokinetics of S-1 capsule in patients with advanced gastric cancer].

The study is to investigate the pharmacokinetics of S-1 capsule (tegafur, gimeracil and potassium oxonate capsule) in patients with advanced gastric cancer after single and multiple oral administration. Twelve patients with advanced gastric cancer were recruited to the study. The dose of S-1 for each patient was determined according to his/her body surface area (BSA). The dose for single administration was 60 mg every subject. The dose for multiple administration for one subject was as follows: 100 mg x d(-1) or 120 mg x d(-1), 28-days consecutive oral administration. The pharmacokinetic parameters of tegafur, 5-fluorouracil, gimeracil, potassium oxonate and uracil after single oral administration were as follows: (2,207 +/- 545), (220.0 +/- 68.2), (374.9 +/- 103.0), (110.5 +/- 100.8) and (831.1 +/- 199.9) ng x mL(-1) for Cmax; (11.8 +/- 3.8), (4.4 +/- 3.3), (7.8 +/- 5.1), (3.1 +/- 0.9) and (8.8 +/- 4.1) h for t1/2, respectively. After six days oral administration, the average steady state plasma concentrations (Cav) of tegafur, 5-fluorouracil, gimeracil, potassium oxonate and uracil were (2,425 +/- 1,172), (73.88 +/- 18.88), (162.6 +/- 70.8), (36.89 +/- 29.35) and (435.3 +/- 141.0) ng x mL(-1), respectively, and the degree of fluctuation (DF) were (1.0 +/- 0.2), (2.5 +/- 0.4), (3.1 +/- 0.8), (2.4 +/- 0.8) and (1.5 +/- 0.3), respectively. The cumulative urine excretion percentage of tegafur, 5-fluorouracil, gimeracil and potassium oxonate in urine within 48 h were (4.2 +/- 2.8) %, (4.7 +/- 1.6) %, (18.5 +/- 6.0) % and (1.7 +/- 1.2) %, repectively, after single oral administration of S-1. The results exhibited that tegafur had some drug accumulation observed, and gimeracil, potassium oxonate, 5-fluorouracil and uracil had no drug accumulation observed.

Biological monitoring of occupational exposure to 5-fluorouracil: urinary α-fluoro-ß-alanine assay by high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in health care personnel.

A new sensitive and specific HPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of α-fluoro-ß-alanine (FBAL), the main metabolite of the antineoplastic drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), in urine for the biological monitoring survey of health care workers exposed to 5-FU is described. This procedure is characterized by a pre-column FBAL derivatization by 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene followed by solid phase extraction sample clean-up. The chromatographic separation was achieved by hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) on a ZIC HILIC column (Sequant) and the quantification was performed by tandem mass spectrometry. The method offers high sensitivity with a quantification limit of 1 µg/l, which is an improvement on those previously reported. The within- and between-day precisions were less than 13% and 15% respectively at the LOQ and no significant relative matrix effect was observed for FBAL. The validated method was applied to the biological monitoring of occupational exposure to 5-FU in a French hospital. Pre- and post-shift urine samples were collected from 19 workers in a hospital pharmacy and an oncology ward over a period of 5 days. On a total of 121 analysed samples, measurable amounts of FBAL were detected in up to 29%, the concentrations range from LOQ to 22.7 µg/l, yielding evidence of occupational exposure to 5-FU. Such data are scarce and represent a step forward in assessing the occupational health risks associated with handling antineoplastic drugs.

[Tissue distribution and excretion of 5-fluorouracil from indomethacin 5-fluorouracil-1-ylmethylester in rats].

To study the tissue distribution and excretion of indomethacin 5-fluorouracil-1-ylmethyl ester (IFM) metabolite 5-fluorouracil in rats, an accurate and specific high performance liquid chromatography method for quantifying IFM in rat plasma and tissues was developed. Biological samples were prepared by liquid-liquid extraction and separated on a Diamonsil C18 column (250 mm x 4.6 mm ID, 5 microm). The mobile phase for tissue samples, plasma samples and feces samples were composed of methanol-water-36% acetic acid (3:96.9:0.1, v/v) and the mobile phase for urine samples was a mixture of methanol-water-36% acetic acid (10:89.9:0.1, v/v). The eluate was monitored by UV absorbance at 260 nm. After a single ig dose of 100 mg x kg(-1) IFM in rats, 5-Fu was mainly distributed in stomach, small intestine, and liver. The concentrations of 5-fluorouracil in other tissues and plasma were low. The excretion of 5-Fu in urine and feces amounted to 0.0065% and 0.063% of the dose, respectively. The method is shown to be accurate and specific, and suitable for preclinical pharmacokinetic studies of IFM.

Heteronuclear 19F-1H statistical total correlation spectroscopy as a tool in drug metabolism: study of flucloxacillin biotransformation.

We present a novel application of the heteronuclear statistical total correlation spectroscopy (HET-STOCSY) approach utilizing statistical correlation between one-dimensional 19F/1H NMR spectroscopic data sets collected in parallel to study drug metabolism. Parallel one-dimensional (1D) 800 MHz 1H and 753 MHz 19F{1H} spectra (n = 21) were obtained on urine samples collected from volunteers (n = 6) at various intervals up to 24 h after oral dosing with 500 mg of flucloxacillin. A variety of statistical relationships between and within the spectroscopic datasets were explored without significant loss of the typically high 1D spectral resolution, generating 1H-1H STOCSY plots, and novel 19F-1H HET-STOCSY, 19F-19F STOCSY, and 19F-edited 1H-1H STOCSY (X-STOCSY) spectroscopic maps, with a resolution of approximately 0.8 Hz/pt for both nuclei. The efficient statistical editing provided by these methods readily allowed the collection of drug metabolic data and assisted structure elucidation. This approach is of general applicability for studying the metabolism of other fluorine-containing drugs, including important anticancer agents such as 5-fluorouracil and flutamide, and is extendable to any drug metabolism study where there is a spin-active X-nucleus (e.g., 13C, 15N, 31P) label present.

Systemic resorption of 5-fluorouracil used in infusion fluid during vitrectomy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine whether 5-fluorouracil (5FU) used in the infusion fluid during vitrectomy is systemically absorbed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The major catabolite of 5FU, alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL) was measured in urine samples of 2 patients that underwent vitrectomy using 5FU in the infusion fluid. RESULTS: In both patients, FBAL was found in the urine samples collected up to 48 hours after the surgery, with the highest concentration and total amount in the first 6 hours after the first urine production after surgery. Moreover, the concentration and total amount of FBAL was higher in the patient who received silicone oil tamponade (versus 12.5% SF6), with the longest surgery time (40 min versus 20 min) and the highest amount of infusion fluid used (350 ml versus 250 ml). CONCLUSIONS: 5FU, used to prevent the formation of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), is systemically absorbed when used in infusion fluid during vitrectomy. As such, patient selection is needed to avoid adverse effects on procreativity. Further studies will be needed to determine which clinical setting will influence most the absorption.

Assay of urinary alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the biological monitoring of occupational exposure to 5-fluorouracil in oncology nurses and pharmacy technicians.

The validation of an analytical method for the measurement of the unnatural amino acid alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (AFBA), the main metabolite of the antineoplastic drug 5-fluorouracil (5FU), in urine for the biological monitoring of the exposure of hospital workers to the drug when preparing the therapeutical doses and administering to cancer patients is described. The method employed a two-step extractive derivatization of the analyte from urine to the N-trifluoroacety-n-butyl ester derivative and detection by selected-ion monitoring gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of structurally specific fragments. The limit of detection was 20 ng/mL with quantification accuracy better than +/-20% and precision (CV%) better than +/-20% in the range 0.020-10 microg/mL. Norleucine was used as the internal standard and the sample-to-sample analysis time was less than 15 min. The validated method has been applied to the biological monitoring of some hospital workers potentially exposed to 5FU and to matched control subjects. On a total number of 65 analyzed urine samples from control and exposed subjects, only three, obtained from exposed subjects, were found to be positive, with values of 20, 30 and 1150 ng/mL, respectively.

Pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil in rats with diabetes mellitus induced by streptozotocin.

The pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-fluorouracil were compared after intravenous administration at a dose of 30 mg/kg to control Sprague-Dawley rats and to rats with diabetes mellitus induced by streptozotocin (DMIS). In DMIS rats, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time infinity (AUC) was significantly smaller (603 versus 909 microg min/ml) due to the significantly faster total body clearance (Cl; 47.8 versus 33.0 ml/min/kg). The faster Cl was due to the significantly faster renal (8.54 versus 4.02 ml/min/kg) and nonrenal (38.5 versus 28.7 ml/min/kg) clearances. In DMIS rats, the total amount of unchanged 5-fluorouracil excreted in 24 h urine was significantly greater (34.1% versus 13.0% of intravenous dose) due to the urine flow rate-dependent renal clearance of 5-fluorouracil in rats (the greater the urine flow rate, the greater the urinary excretion of 5-fluorouracil). Greater urinary excretion and a significantly smaller AUC resulted in a significantly faster Cl(r) in DMIS rats. The faster Cl(nr) in DMIS rats could be due to an increase in the expression and mRNA level of CYP1A1/2 in the rats.

Further studies on the kidney- and site-selective delivery of 5-fluorouracil following kidney surface application in rats.

The present study was undertaken to elucidate the kidney- and site-selective delivery of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) following kidney surface application in rats. We selected an experimental system utilizing a cylindrical diffusion cell attached to the right kidney surface. After 5-FU was applied to this surface, approximately 60% was absorbed in 180 min. A semi-log plot of the remaining amount of 5-FU in the diffusion cell gave a straight line. The cumulative amount of urinary excretion of 5-FU for up to 180 min from the right ureter was significantly higher than that from the left ureter. On the other hand, the cumulative amount of urinary excretion of 5-FU from the right and left ureters after intravenous administration of the drug was similar. The 5-FU concentration at four sites in the right kidney after intravenous administration was also similar, while the drug was site-selectively delivered in the kidney after its surface application. 5-FU accumulated at the site under the diffusion cell was rapidly eliminated after its removal from the diffusion cell. From these results, we demonstrated that the absorption of 5-FU on the kidney surface in rats is explained mostly by passive diffusion. It was further elucidated that kidney surface application of this drug in rats results in its the kidney- and site-selective delivery.

Pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral formulation of ftorafur, oxonic acid and 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (molar ratio 1:0.4:1) in patients with solid tumors.

S-1 is an oral formulation of ftorafur (FT), oxonic acid and 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. FT is a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, CDHP is a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor and oxonic acid is an inhibitor of 5-FU phosphoribosylation in the gastrointestinal mucosa and was included to prevent gastrointestinal toxicity. We determined the pharmacokinetics of S-1 in 28 patients at doses of 25, 35, 40 and 45 mg/m(2). The plasma C(max) values of FT, 5-FU, oxonic acid and CDHP increased dose-dependently and after 1-2 h were in the ranges 5.8-13 microM, 0.4-2.4 microM, 0.026-1.337 microM, and 1.1-3.6 microM, respectively. Uracil levels, indicative of DPD inhibition, also increased dose-dependently from basal levels of 0.03-0.25 microM to 3.6-9.4 microM after 2-4 h, and 0.09-0.9 microM was still present after 24 h. The pharmacokinetics of CDHP and uracil were linear over the dose range. The areas under the plasma concentration curves (AUC) for CDHP and uracil were in the ranges 418-1735 and 2281-8627 micromol x min/l, respectively. The t(1/2) values were in the ranges 213-692 and 216-354 min, respectively. Cumulative urinary excretion of FT was predominantly as 5-FU and was 2.2-11.9%; the urinary excretion of both fluoro-beta-alanine and uracil was generally maximal between 6 and 18 h. During 28-day courses with twice-daily S-1 administration, 5-FU and uracil generally increased. Before each intake of S-1, 5-FU varied between 0.5 and 1 microM and uracil was in the micromolar range (up to 7 microM), indicating that effective DPD inhibition was maintained during the course. In a biopsy of an esophageal adenocarcinoma metastasis that had regressed, thymidylate synthase, the target of 5-FU, was inhibited 50%, but increased four- to tenfold after relapse in subsequent biopsies. In conclusion, oral S-1 administration resulted in prolonged exposure to micromolar 5-FU concentrations due to DPD inhibition, and the decrease in uracil levels after 6 h followed the pattern of CDHP and indicates reversible DPD inhibition.

Metabolism of a novel nucleoside analogue, OGT 719, in the isolated perfused rat liver model, in rats, in tumour models and in patients.

1. The metabolic pathway(s) of OGT 719, a novel nucleoside analogue in which galactose is covalently attached to the N1 of 5-fluorouracil (FU), have been investigated with (19)F-NMR spectroscopy in (1) the isolated perfused rat liver (IPRL) model, (2) normal rats, (3) rats bearing the HSN LV10 sarcoma, (4) nude mice xenografted with the human hepatoma HepG2 and (5) urine from patients. 2. The administration of OGT 719 results in the formation of small amounts of FU. IPRL experiments with OGT 719 in combination with asialofetuin, a natural asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGP-r), suggest competitive binding of OGT 719 to the ASGP-r. 3. The data obtained in non-tumour rats also demonstrated an extremely low metabolization of OGT 719 into FU and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine, the well-known major metabolite of FU. 4. A comparison of tumour extracts from rats bearing the HSN LV10 sarcoma treated with FU or OGT 719 showed the incorporation of FU into RNA in rats treated with FU but not in rats treated with OGT 719; nevertheless, the incorporation of FU into RNA was observed in the liver from rats treated with OGT 719. 5. In a human hepatoma xenografted to nude mice, both the OGT 719 and FU contents of the tumour were markedly higher than in the corresponding liver, suggesting a tumour-specific trapping of OGT 719 in hepatoma. 6. The metabolism of OGT 719 was also extremely low in patients. 7. In conclusion, the present study shows the value of (19)F-NMR for demonstrating for the first time that OGT 719 is a prodrug of FU although very poorly metabolized.

Metabolism of capecitabine, an oral fluorouracil prodrug: (19)F NMR studies in animal models and human urine.

Capecitabine (Xeloda; CAP) is a recently developed oral antineoplastic prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with enhanced tumor selectivity. Previous studies have shown that CAP activation follows a pathway with three enzymatic steps and two intermediary metabolites, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR) and 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), to form 5-FU preferentially in tumor tissues. In the present work, we investigated all fluorinated compounds present in liver, bile, and perfusate medium of isolated perfused rat liver (IPRL) and in liver, plasma, kidneys, bile, and urine of healthy rats. Moreover, data obtained from rat urine were compared with those from mice and human urine. According to a low cytidine deaminase (3.5.4.5) activity in rats, 5'-DFCR was by far the main product in perfusate medium from IPRL and plasma and urine from rats. Liver and circulating 5'-DFCR in perfusate and plasma equilibrated at the same concentration value in the range 25 to 400 microM, which supports the involvement of es-type nucleoside transporter in the liver. 5'-DFUR and alpha-fluoro-beta-ureidopropionic acid (FUPA) + alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL) were the main products in urine of mice, making up 23 to 30% of the administered dose versus 3 to 4% in rat. In human urine, FUPA + FBAL represented 50% of the administered dose, 5'-DFCR 10%, and 5'-DFUR 7%. Since fluorine-19 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy gives an overview of all the fluorinated compounds present in a sample, we observed the following unreported metabolites of CAP: 1) 5-fluorocytosine and its hydroxylated metabolite, 5-fluoro-6-hydroxycytosine, 2) fluoride ion, 3) 2-fluoro-3-hydroxypropionic acid and fluoroacetate, and 4) a glucuroconjugate of 5'-DFCR.

A novel 0.5% fluorouracil cream is minimally absorbed into the systemic circulation yet is as effective as 5% fluorouracil cream.

Recent in vitro and in vivo studies compared the absorption of a 0.5% fluorouracil cream with that of a 5% fluorouracil cream, following topical application to the skin. Both studies demonstrated that fluorouracil is minimally absorbed into the systemic circulation. Despite a one-tenth concentration difference between formulations, the cumulative amount of fluorouracil excreted in the urine of patients treated with the 0.5% cream was one fortieth that of patients treated with the 5% cream. Interestingly, higher percentages of fluorouracil were retained in the skin following application of the 0.5% cream compared with the 5% cream, suggesting that delivery of the 0.5% cream may be more targeted to the affected area. Other studies have demonstrated that the 0.5% cream is as effective as the 5% cream for the treatment of actinic keratoses (AKs) and has a more favorable tolerability profile. Therefore, this new 0.5% fluorouracil cream may be a safer, yet equally effective treatment alternative.