Trans-ulnar fracture dislocations of the elbow: a systematic review and clarification of classification systems.

BACKGROUND: Complex elbow dislocations in which the dorsal cortex of the ulna is fractured can be difficult to classify and therefore treat. These have variably been described as either Monteggia variant injuries or trans-olecranon fracture dislocations. Additionally, O'Driscoll et al classified coronoid fractures that exit the dorsal cortex of the ulna as "basal coronoid, subtype 2" fractures. The Mayo classification of trans-ulnar fracture dislocations categorizes these injuries in 3 types according to what the coronoid remains attached to: trans-olecranon fracture dislocations, Monteggia variant fracture dislocations, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of these injury patterns as reported in the literature. Our hypothesis was that trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations would have a worse prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify studies with trans-ulnar fracture dislocations that had documentation of associated coronoid injuries. A literature search identified 16 qualifying studies with 296 fractures. Elbows presenting with basal subtype 2 or Regan/Morrey III coronoid fractures and Jupiter IIA and IID injuries were classified as trans-ulnar basal coronoid fractures. Patients with trans-olecranon or Monteggia fractures were classified as such if the coronoid was not fractured or an associated coronoid fracture had been classified as O'Driscoll tip, anteromedial facet, basal subtype I, or Regan Morrey I/II. RESULTS: The 296 fractures reviewed were classified as trans-olecranon in 44 elbows, Monteggia variant in 82 elbows, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations in 170 elbows. Higher rates of complications and reoperations were reported for trans-ulnar basal coronoid injuries (40%, 25%) compared to trans-olecranon (11%, 18%) and Monteggia variant injuries (25%, 13%). The mean flexion-extension arc for basal coronoid fractures was 106° compared to 117° for Monteggia (P < .01) and 121° for trans-olecranon injuries (P = .02). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 84 points for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, 91 for Monteggia (P < .01), and 93 for trans-olecranon fracture dislocations (P < .05). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 22 and 80 for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, respectively, compared to 23 and 89 for trans-olecranon fractures. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons was not available for any Monteggia injuries, but the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was 13. DISCUSSION: Trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations are associated with inferior patient reported outcome measures, decreased range of motion, and increased complication rates compared to trans-olecranon or Monteggia variant fracture dislocations. Further research is needed to determine the most appropriate treatment for this difficult injury pattern.

Coronoid Fragment Size in Monteggia Fractures Predicts Ultimate Function.

We sought to determine what effect the size of a displaced coronoid fracture fragment in Monteggia injuries has on clinical outcome. Sixty-seven patients presented to an academic medical center for operative fixation of a Monteggia fracture. Radiographs were assessed for length and height of the displaced coronoid fragment using measuring tools in our center's imaging archive system. Data were analyzed using binary logistic or linear regression, as appropriate, controlling for sex, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Outcome measurements included radiographic healing, range of motion, postoperative complications, and reoperation. The cohort had a mean follow-up of 16.7 months. Mean coronoid fragment area was 362.4±155.9 mm2. Elbow range of motion decreased by 3.8° of elbow flexion (P<.001), 3.3° of elbow extension (P<.001), and 3.8° of forearm supination (P=.007) for every 1-cm2 increase in coronoid fragment area. Complications (P=.012) and reoperation (P=.036) were associated with increasing coronoid fragment area. Nonunion rate, nerve injury, and pronation range of motion were not correlated to increasing coronoid fracture fragment area (P=.777, P=.123, and P=.351, respectively). As displaced coronoid fragment size increases in Monteggia fracture patterns, elbow range of motion decreases linearly. Coronoid displacement was also associated with increased rates of postoperative complication and need for reoperation. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):15-21.].

A coronoid-centric classification system of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations has almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement.

BACKGROUND: Fracture-dislocations of the elbow, particularly those that involve a fracture through the proximal ulna, are complex and can be difficult to manage. Moreover, current classification systems often cannot discriminate between Monteggia-variant injury patterns and trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, particularly when the fracture involves the coronoid. The Mayo classification of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations categorizes these fractures into 3 types according to what the coronoid is still attached to: trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the ulnar metaphysis); Monteggia-variant fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the olecranon); and ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the ulnar metaphysis). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the Mayo classification system when assessing elbow fracture-dislocations involving the proximal ulna based on radiographs and computed tomography scans. METHODS: Three fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons and 2 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons blindly and independently evaluated the radiographs and computed tomography scans of 90 consecutive proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations treated at a level I trauma center. The inclusion criteria included subluxation or dislocation of the elbow and/or radioulnar joint with a complete fracture through the proximal ulna. Each surgeon classified all fractures according to the Mayo classification, which is based on what the coronoid remains attached to (ulnar metaphysis, olecranon, or neither). Intraobserver reliability was determined by scrambling the order of the fractures and having each observer classify all the fractures again after a washout period ≥ 6 weeks. Interobserver reliability was obtained to assess the overall agreement between observers. κ Values were calculated for both intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The average intraobserver agreement was 0.87 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.76-0.91). Interobserver agreement was 0.80 (substantial agreement; range, 0.70-0.90) for the first reading session and 0.89 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.85-0.93) for the second reading session. The overall average interobserver agreement was 0.85 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.79-0.91). CONCLUSION: Classifying proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations based on what the coronoid remains attached to (olecranon, ulnar metaphysis, or neither) was associated with almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement, regardless of trauma vs. shoulder and elbow fellowship training. Further research is needed to determine whether the use of this classification system leads to the application of principles specific to the management of these injuries and translates into better outcomes.

Fracture-Dislocations of the Elbow: A Comparison of Monteggia and Terrible Triad Fracture Patterns.

Fracture-dislocations of the elbow are a spectrum of injuries that have varying outcomes and complications, such as limited range of motion and long-term pain. The Monteggia fracture-dislocation and terrible triad fracture-dislocation are 2 such injury patterns that occur secondary to different mechanisms. This study sought to compare complication profiles and patient outcomes associated with these 2 distinct injury patterns. A retrospective chart review of all adult patients treated by 1 of 3 orthopedic traumatologists at a major academic center for operative fixation for either a Monteggia fracture-dislocation or a terrible triad elbow fracture-dislocation over a 12-year period was performed. Data collected included demographics, surgical data, patient-reported pain and elbow stiffness, elbow range of motion, presence of elbow joint contracture, nerve injuries, healing complications, and need for reoperation. The review included 105 patients, 58 with Monteggia injury and 47 with terrible triad injury, who had complete follow-up and radiographic imaging available. At latest follow-up, the 2 groups had similar rates of pain, reoperation, and ultimate elbow range of motion in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination. Elbow contractures requiring operative release were more commonly associated with terrible triad injury, and the incidence of nonunion was significantly greater in Monteggia fractures. A Monteggia fracture-dislocation portends a higher risk of ulna nonunion, whereas terrible triad injury is associated with elbow contracture. Despite their unique complications, both patterns ultimately have high rates of reoperation as their unique complications are both indications for operative repair. Patients should be appropriately counseled on the complication profile of their unique injury pattern. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(3):158-163.].

Radial head distalisation with an external ring fixator as a therapy option in children with chronic posttraumatic radiocapitellar dislocations.

PURPOSE: Missed monteggia-type injuries in children can result in chronic radial head dislocation with anatomic changes and osteoarticular remodeling of the radial head. In later stages, joint reconstruction is impossible and a functional radial head distalization can be a therapy option in symptomatic patients. METHODS: From 2010 to 2018, 46 patients (18 female and 28 male, mean age 11.8 (4-20)) with chronic radius head dislocation treated in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. A radial head distalization was performed in symptomatic patients at the time of ulna lengthening and angulation by use of an external ring fixator. We analyzed the surgical and radiographic data as well as the clinical outcome of the patients measured by DASH and Mayo Elbow score. RESULTS: 16 patients (6 female, 10 male) fulfilled the criteria for functional radial head distalization. Main reason was Monteggia injury in 11 cases, and radial head fracture in 5 cases. Average follow-up was 5.1 years (range 1-9, SD 2.1). Mean time from injury was 4.14 years (range: 4 months to 12 years, SD 3.5 years). Mean duration of external fixation was 106 days (range 56-182, SD 31.2), lengthening was 21.3 mm (range 12-42, SD 8.8). Average degree of sagittal angulation 14.8° (0-32°, SD 10.7°), coronal angulation 4.4° (0-25°, SD 7.3°). DASH score showed a good result with 2.4, and the MAYO Elbow Score was excellent (95/100). No secondary luxation of the radius head was detected. CONCLUSION: Radial head distalization with external ring fixator can be a therapy option for chronic radius head dislocations in symptomatic patients without losing stability of the elbow joint in contrast to radial head resection.

Pediatric Monteggia Fracture Outcome Assessment - Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: The term Monteggia fracture refers to a class of injuries encompassing the fracture of the proximal end of the ulna with subluxation or dislocation of the radial head. These injuries account for 0.4-1% of all forearm fractures in children. Despite its low incidence, Monteggia fractures require particular attention, since as much as 30-50% of the cases may be unrecognized, which subsequently leads to complications. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate treatment outcomes of Monteggia fractures in children. Both conservative treatment and surgery were analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15 children (7 boys and 8 girls) between the ages of 4-16.3 years (mean age 8.3 years) with Monteggia fractures were hospitalized at our center in the years 2015-2020. Closed reduction and immobilization in a cast were performed in 12 patients, while three children underwent surgical treatment with internal fixation of the ulna. The radial head dislocation was reduced successfully in every patient. RESULTS: Every child from the study group who received conservative treatment regained full elbow mobility as well as normal forearm supination and pronation. Only one of the patients who underwent the surgery demonstrated a 20° deficit in elbow flexion that did not affect limb function. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Our experience shows that closed reduction together with immobilization in a cast is usually a sufficient treatment in Monteggia fractures. 2. However, the dislocated radial head should be properly reduced in all patients. 3. Correct diagnosis and treatment followed by appropriate rehabilitation result in full recovery and no mobility limitations in children and teenagers.

Outcomes After Operative Treatment of Pediatric Monteggia Fracture-Dislocations: Comparison Between Open and Closed Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Open pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations are a relatively uncommon injury pattern, with limited numbers reported in previous series. Open fracture-dislocations frequently represent more severe injury patterns with potential for contamination. We aim to determine differences in long-term clinical and functional outcomes in the operative management of closed versus open pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations. METHODS: A retrospective review of operatively treated pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations was performed. Closed versus open injuries were compared in both clinical outcomes, as well as patient-reported outcomes through Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 30 operatively treated injuries, 12/30 (40%) were open fracture-dislocations. Patients were followed clinically for an average of 15.65 months in open injuries and an average of 4.61 months in closed injuries. A trend toward increased time to union was observed, however, significance was not achieved; open injuries averaged 8.0 versus 5.8 weeks for closed injuries ( P =0.07). Two patients (11%) in the closed fracture group experienced postoperative complications; both were minor. Five patients (42%) in the open fracture-dislocation group experienced a total of 6 postoperative complications; 5 of the 6 complications were major. QuickDASH scores were obtained at an average of 5 years postoperatively; mean QuickDASH scores were higher in the open fracture group, 13.1, compared with the closed fracture group, 5.9 ( P =0.038). Increased QuickDASH scores were independently associated with presence of postoperative complications. QuickDASH score could be expected to increase by 12.5 points in those with major complications ( P =0.044). CONCLUSION: We present the largest single cohort of pediatric open Monteggia fracture-dislocation injuries to date. These injuries are predictive of poorer outcomes including trend toward increased time to union, increased risk of major complication, and can independently predict worse long-term patient-reported functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-these data represent a retrospective comparative study of clinical and functional outcomes.

Chronic Monteggia in pediatric population: A narrative literature review.

Monteggia lesion is a traumatic condition that affects the forearm and is characterized by the association of an ulna fracture with a dislocation of the radius capitellar and proximal radius ulnar joints in the majority of cases. Although several authors have contributed to the understanding of this pathology over the years, it remains a challenge for orthopedists, and if not recognized and treated properly, it can have serious consequences. In these cases, a chronic injury develops, which is even more difficult to manage in terms of timing and treatment options. A narrative review of the literature on missed elbow injuries in children was conducted, and chronic Monteggia was the most frequently encountered injury. The analysis of the articles attempts to clarify some points and draw general conclusions on which to reflect.

Importancia médico legal de las complicaciones observadas en la fractura de Monteggia: Reporte de caso / Medico-legal importance of the complications observed in Monteggia's fracture

Resumen La Fractura de Monteggia es una lesión caracterizada por una fractura del cúbito en su porción proximal o media junto con una luxación de la cabeza del radio. (1) Es una lesión poco frecuente que representa entre el 5 y el 7% de las fracturas del antebrazo, a pesar de su rareza, siempre ha sido considerada de gran importancia por las comorbilidades que pueden acompañarla, bien por ser tratadas de forma inadecuada o por retraso en su tratamiento médico. Cuando no se diagnostica y trata a tiempo, puede quedar como secuela una limitación de la movilidad articular y una incapacidad funcional importante en la extremidad traumatizada. (2) Es por esta razón que se decide realizar el presente artículo el cual pretende reflejar la importancia de las complicaciones presentadas en la Fractura de Monteggia, al momento de la valoración médico legal, pudiendo requerir incapacidad temporal y permanente dado al tiempo que toma su recuperación, la limitación a la movilización posterior al manejo médico y el dolor residual que puede presentar.

Abstract The Monteggia Fracture is an injury characterized by a fracture of the proximal or middle portion of the ulna with a dislocation of the head of the radius. (1) It is a rare injury and represents between 5 and 7% of forearm fractures. Despite its rarity, it has always been considered of great importance due to the comorbidities that can accompany it, either due to being treated inadequately or due to delay in your medical treatment. When it is not diagnosed and treated in time, a limitation of joint mobility and a significant functional disability in the traumatized limb can remain as a consequence. (2) It is for this reason that we decided to carry out this article which reflect the importance of the complication of the Monteggia Fracture, at the time of the legal evaluation, which may require temporary and permanent disability given to the time it takes its recovery, the limitation to mobilization after medical management and the residual pain that it may present.

Irreducible Monteggia Fracture-Dislocation Secondary to an Entrapped Brachialis Tendon: A Case Report.

CASE: A 7-year-old boy sustained a Monteggia fracture-dislocation. Corrective osteotomy of the ulna was performed to restore proper forearm anatomy and achieve radial head reduction. Recurrent radial head instability was noted postoperatively, and magnetic resonance imaging indicated recurrent dislocation of the radial head with, notably, an entrapped brachialis tendon and annular ligament. Open reduction of the elbow was performed. Anatomic reduction of the radiocapitellar joint and full range of motion without instability was achieved. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of persistent radial head instability because of an entrapped brachialis tendon.

Unusual Combination of a Fracture Monteggia Equivalent With Post-traumatic Radial Artery Pseudoaneurysm in a Child: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

CASE: We report a unique case of a combination of forearm fracture and traumatic radial artery pseudoaneurysm in an 8-year-old child. The fracture pattern was a Monteggia equivalent with a mid-diaphyseal ulnar fracture and a radial neck fracture with displacement of the distal radial diaphyseal fracture fragment. The pseudoaneurysm, which probably developed after vigorous manipulation by a bonesetter, thrombosed spontaneously, and the fracture was managed nonoperatively with a good outcome. CONCLUSION: Pseudoaneurysm of the radial artery is a rare phenomenon associated with fracture in a child. A history of vigorous manipulation of displaced fracture fragments in the vicinity of a major vessel should raise suspicion of this possible complication.

Quantitative Analysis for the Change in Lengths of the Radius and Ulna in Missed Bado Type I Monteggia Fracture.

BACKGROUND: In missed Monteggia fracture (MMF) cases, ulnar angulation and lengthening by osteotomy are required to reduce the dislocated radial head. This study aimed to clarify the abnormal discrepancy in length between the radius and ulna in MMF. We tested the hypothesis that the increase in the abnormal discrepancy in length between the radius and ulna relates with the duration of radial head dislocation. METHODS: In total, 24 patients with MMF were studied and classified into 2 groups, according to the duration of radial head dislocation, including the early group (n=9, within 3 y) and the long-standing group (n=15, older than 3 y). The lengths of the radius (Lr) and ulna (Lu) were measured. The difference in length between the ulna and radius (DL=Lu-Lr) was calculated on both the affected (DLaff) and normal (DLnor) sides. DLnor-DLaff, which represented an abnormal discrepancy in both bones, was analyzed for correlation with the duration of radial head dislocation and the age at initial injury. RESULTS: The affected and normal sides had no differences in the Lr of both the groups and in the Lu of the early group. However, in the long-standing group, Lu was significantly smaller in the affected side than in the normal side (P=0.001). In the long-standing group, DLaff was significantly smaller, owing to decreased length of the ulna, than DLnor (P=0.003). The DLnor-DLaff was positively correlated with the duration of radial head dislocation and was negatively correlated with the age at injury. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic MMF cases, the length of the ulna was shorter in the affected side than in the normal side. Therefore, ulnar lengthening is necessary to resolve this abnormal discrepancy and reduce the radial head. Because excessive ulnar lengthening has risks of postoperative complications, one of the surgical options is gradual ulnar lengthening or shortening osteotomy of the radius. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Prognosis study.

Effect of ulnar angulation and soft tissue sectioning on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries: an in vitro biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Radial head instability continues to be a challenge in the management of anterior Monteggia injuries; however, there is a paucity of literature on the factors that contribute to this instability. The aim of this biomechanical investigation was to examine the effects of ulnar angulation and soft tissue insufficiency on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries. METHODS: Six cadaveric arms were mounted in an elbow motion simulator. Radial head translation was measured during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm supinated. After testing the elbows in the intact state, the ulna was osteotomized and tested at 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° of extension angulation. To examine the effect of soft tissue insufficiency, the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule, annular ligament, quadrate ligament, and the proximal and middle interosseous membrane (IOM) were sequentially sectioned. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in anterior radial head translation with greater ulnar extension angulation. Sequential soft tissue sectioning also significantly increased anterior radial head translation. There was no increase in radial head translation with isolated sectioning of the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule. Additional sectioning of the annular ligament and quadrate ligament slightly increased anterior radial head translation but did not reach statistical significance. Subsequent sectioning of the proximal and middle IOM resulted in significant increases in anterior radial head translation. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that progressive ulnar extension angulation results in an incremental increase in anterior radial head translation in anterior Monteggia injuries. Moreover, increasing magnitudes of soft tissue disruption result in greater anterior radial head instability.

Effect of soft tissue injury and ulnar angulation on radial head instability in a Bado type I Monteggia fracture model.

The effects of soft tissue damage and ulnar angulation deformity on radial head instability in Monteggia fractures are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that radial head instability correlates with the magnitude of ulnar angular deformity and the degree of proximal forearm soft tissue injury in Bado type I Monteggia fractures.We performed a biomechanical study in 6 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities. Monteggia fractures were simulated by anterior ulnar angulation osteotomy and sequential sectioning of ligamentous structures. We measured radial head displacement during passive mobility testing in pronation, supination, and neutral rotation using an electromagnetic tracking device. Measurements at various ligament sectioning stages and ulnar angulation substages were statistically compared with those in the intact elbow.Radial head displacement increased with sequential ligament sectioning and increased proportionally with the degree of anterior ulnar angulation. Annular ligament sectioning resulted in a significant increase in displacement only in pronation (P < .05). When the anterior ulnar deformity was reproduced, the radial head displaced least in supination. The addition of proximal interosseous membrane sectioning significantly increased the radial head displacement in supination (P < .05), regardless of the degree of anterior ulnar angulation.Our Monteggia fracture model showed that radial head instability is influenced by the degree of soft tissue damage and ulnar angulation. Annular ligament injury combined with a minimal (5°) ulnar deformity may cause elbow instability, especially in pronation. The proximal interosseous membrane contributes to radial head stability in supination, regardless of ulnar angulation, and proximal interosseous membrane injury led to significant radial head instability in supination.

Treatment of forearm diaphyseal defect by distraction compression bone transport and continued distraction for radial head reduction: A case study.

Treatment of infected forearm nonunion and defects represents a difficult task for the operating surgeons. Conventional methods like composite and vascularized fibular grafts and the induced membranes filled with cancellous autografts or the Masquelet technique have been reported to be useful and successful, but sometimes it is difficult to predict the outcome and cannot address simultaneous deformities or the need to apply gradual distraction for reduction of a chronically dislocated radial head. Ilizarov technique has an answer for such conditions. We report a 43 years old man with infected ulnar defect and dislocated radial head as a result of infected Monteggia fracture: the patient was successfully treated by Ilizarov bone transport after failed attempts by bone spacer and fibular graft.

Repair of Bado II Monteggia Fracture: Case Presentation and Surgical Technique.

INTRODUCTION: Monteggia fractures are rare, although complex elbow injuries. Bado II Monteggia fractures are characterized by posterior dislocation of the radial head and concurrent fracture of the proximal or middle third of the ulna. This video demonstrates the open reduction and internal fixation of a complex Bado II Monteggia fracture dislocation. METHODS: The patient is a 65-year-old woman with a Bado II Monteggia fracture after a low-energy fall from standing height. Given the extent of comminution and the instability of the elbow, the patient was indicated for surgical fixation. RESULTS: This video demonstrates a locking plate technique for repair of a comminuted fracture of the proximal ulna. Anatomical reduction of ulnohumeral and radiocapitellar joints and stable fixation with bone grafting of the fracture are achieved with a medial 2.0/2.4-mm plate and a dorsal precontoured variable-angle locking plate. Demonstration of radial head arthroplasty is provided as an alternative for utilization in cases with a radial head fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical reduction and fixation of complex Monteggia fracture dislocations can be achieved with adherence to standard aspects of bony reconstruction. In this video we present the case of a Bado II Monteggia fracture surgically repaired with a locking plate construct.

A very rare presentation of reoperation combined both old Monteggia fracture and secondary distal radioulnar joint dislocation in adult: A case report.

RATIONALE: The old Monteggia fracture is an uncommon lesion pattern in adult, which may lead to the potential complications such as recurrent dislocation of the radial head, heterotopic ossification of the elbow, nerve palsy, malunion of the ulna, and residual forearm deformity. However, the secondary distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) dislocation is rarely reported in the similar lesion. Here we present a unique reoperation of old Monteggia fracture combined with secondary DRUJ disruption after the initial operation failure. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 38-year-old male presented to our hospital outpatient office complaining of left elbow stiffness and ongoing wrist dysfunction with a history of injury to the left forearm caused by a forklift accident that occurred 5 months previously. DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTIONS: At the local hospital, the patient underwent successively fasciotomy and decompression, ulnar open reduction, and internal fixation due to osteofascial compartment syndrome and a misdiagnosed ulnar fracture. Upon examination, the secondary dorsal dislocation of the DRUJ was obvious both clinically and radiographically. We performed a revision surgery called ulnar osteotomy, radioulnar ligament repair, and temporary fixation of the DRUJ with a Kirschner wire. OUTCOMES: The patient received a satisfactory result without observed redislocation and relapse according to the 1-year follow-up. LESSONS: Considering the notoriously poor outcomes, the importance of early recognition and accurate treatment should be emphasized repeatedly in similar lesions. Paying close and continuous attention to the clinical and radiographic examinations of the elbow and wrist joint is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.

Acute Pediatric Monteggia Fractures: A Conservative Approach to Stabilization.

BACKGROUND: In 2015, a multicenter study group proposed a treatment algorithm for pediatric Monteggia fractures based upon the ulnar fracture pattern. This strategy recommends surgical stabilization for all complete ulna fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether an initial nonoperative approach to pediatric Monteggia fractures resulted in poorer outcomes and a higher rate of complications. METHODS: This institutional review board approved retrospective study evaluated all Monteggia fractures presenting to a level 1 pediatric trauma center between 2008 and 2014. Chart and radiographic reviews were performed on 94 patients who met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 5.5 years (range, 1 to 13 y). The mean clinical follow-up was 18 weeks. Major complications were defined as those requiring an unplanned second procedure (other than implant removal) or that may result in long-term disability (residual radial head subluxation/dislocation). Univariate (P<0.05) and Multivariate Classification and Regression Tree (CART) (P<0.05) analyses were used to identify variables associated with the need for surgical stabilization. RESULTS: At final follow-up, there were no cases of residual radiocapitellar joint subluxation or dislocation and all fractures had healed. The majority (83%) of patients were successfully managed with a cast. Univariate analysis found Bado type and maximum ulna angulation as significant predictors (P<0.05), whereas the CART analysis found ulna angulation >36.5 degrees as the only primary predictor of requiring surgical stabilization. Overall, good outcomes were achieved in all patients with few major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although treatment algorithms are intended to minimize complications and maximize good outcomes, we believe that an unintentional consequence of the recently proposed pediatric Monteggia fracture treatment guideline may be the overtreatment of these injuries. In our cohort, the majority of patients were able to avoid the operating room and surgical implants without compromising outcomes or complications. This more conservative approach, however, requires close monitoring of patients in the first 3 weeks during which most reductions were lost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic studies, case series.