Geriatric distal femoral fractures: post-operative complications and nine-year mortality-a retrospective analysis of two tertiary trauma centres.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to estimate the mortality at various post-operative intervals and explore influential variables for these outcomes in elderly patients with distal femur fractures (DFF). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted across two tertiary care institutions, between 2014 and 2020. The primary outcomes were mortality rates at 30-day, six month, and one year post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included 1-year readmission and reintervention rates along with their correlated complications. RESULTS: A total of 37 DFF in 35 patients was analyzed; average age was 83.6 years (range, 65-98 years). The overall mortality rate at a maximum follow-up of 8.8 years was 74% (26/35 patients). The median survival time was 3.2 years and the survival probability at five years was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13 to 43%). Mortality rates at 30 days, six months, and one year after surgery were 8.6% (3 patients), 23% (8 patients), and 34% (12 patients), respectively. Overall mortality rate was 64% (15/24 patients) for native distal femur fractures, and 92% (13/14 patients) for periprosthetic fractures (p = 0.109). Patients older than 85 years and male gender were identified as risk factors for mortality within the first year post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Elderly fractures have a high mortality at eight years of follow-up. Mortality at one year was much higher than in other studies of the same nature. We did not find statistically significant differences when comparing native bone fractures with periprosthetic fractures. Factors that impact mortality were being a man, advanced age, elevated index comorbidity, and dementia. There is no relationship between the time to be taken to the surgical procedure and mortality results.

Late Periprosthetic Femoral Stress Fracture Associated with Extra-articular Deformity in a Patient with Fibrous Dysplasia: A Case Report.

CASE: In the setting of a total hip arthroplasty performed in a patient with a proximal femoral deformity, atraumatic periprosthetic femoral stress fracture may arise as a complication. We report a rare case of a late periprosthetic femoral stress fracture around a cemented stem in a patient with a history of fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur. After a 10-year uneventful period, the patient complained about a subtle, subacute pain in his left thigh induced by exercise but not with daily axial load. Diagnosis of a nondisplaced, incomplete (i.e., only compromising the lateral femoral cortex) periprosthetic femoral stress fracture was made with plain radiographs, blood work, and bone scintigraphy. Surgical treatment consisted of a minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis bridging the femoral deformity plus percutaneous osteoperiosteal decortication. At 5-year follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic with full return to physical activity, with radiographs evidencing callus formation. CONCLUSION: Stress fractures around well-fixed femoral stems, while infrequent, should be addressed in patients with a history of severe proximal femur deformity experiencing atraumatic thigh pain.

Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm.

PURPOSE: Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures are challenging injuries. Multiple factors must be carefully evaluated for an adequate therapeutic strategy, such as the state of bone healing, the type of implant, the time and performed personnel of previous surgery, and the stability of fixation. The aim of this study is to propose a rationale for the treatment. METHODS: The peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFFs) system, a therapeutic algorithm was developed for the management of all patients presenting a subtype A PIFF, based on the type of the original implant (extra- vs. intra-medullary), implant length and fracture location. The adequacy and reliability of the proposed algorithm and the fracture healing process were assessed at the last clinical follow-up using the Parker mobility score and radiological assessment, respectively. In addition, all complications were noticed. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, or median and range according to their distribution. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentages. RESULTS: This is a retrospective case series of 33 PIFFs, and the mean post-operative Parker mobility score was (5.60 ± 2.54) points. Five patients (15.1%) achieved complete mobility without aids (9 points) and 1 (3.0%) patient was not able to walk. Two other patients (6.1%) were non-ambulatory prior to PPIF. The mean follow-up was (21.51 ± 9.12) months (range 6 - 48 months). There were 7 (21.2%) complications equally distributed between patients managed either with nailing or plating. There were no cases of nonunion or mechanical failure of the original implant. CONCLUSION: The proposed treatment algorithm shows adequate, reliable and straightforward to assist the orthopaedic trauma surgeon on the difficult decision-making process regarding the management of PIFF occurring in previously healed fractures. In addition, it may become a useful tool to optimize the use of the classification, thus potentially improving the outcomes and minimizing complications.

Ventana cortical anterior para extracción de vástago en revisión de artroplastia total de cadera: una alternativa a la osteotomía trocantérica extendida / Anterior cortical window for stem extraction in total hip arthroplasty revision: an alternative to extended trochanteric osteotomy

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a safe and effective procedure in patients with end-stage ostheoarthritis. In the last years the indication for THA is increasingly in younger patients, associated with rising of life expectancy, this imply an increase in revision surgeries for various causes such as: aseptic loosening, fractures and infections. In this context and in view of the need to replace the femoral component, alternatives to the classic extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) arise, such as the anterior cortical window (ACW), which allows the rate of complications to be reduced with excellent results. We present the case of a 51-year-old patient who sustained one episode of dislocation, who required revision surgery due to aseptic loosenig, where the ACW was used for the extraction of the stem. In addition, a review of the literature was made to show advantages and complications regarding ETO.

Preliminary outcomes of the cementless UNITED hip system for primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to report the initial results of the cementless UNITED hip system in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. METHODS: We retrospectively studied a consecutive series of 203 cementless THAs in 180 patients operated between 2015-2017. We included 89 female and 91 male patients with a mean age of 67 (28 to 89) years. The mean follow-up was 40 (29 to 62) months. Clinical outcome scores and radiographs were measured. Survival was calculated defining failure as the need for any further femoral or acetabular revision, irrespective of the reason. RESULTS: No femoral component loosening was detected. One patient had a Vancouver-B1 intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture treated with implant retention and cerclage wires. Two acetabular components were revised for aseptic loosening. Three patients suffered an acute infection treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention. The mean Merle d'Aubigné et Postel scores improved from 13 (4 to 16) points preoperatively to 17 (12 to 18) points at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). At a mean time of 40 months of follow-up, the survival was 99% and 100% for the acetabular and the femoral components, respectively. CONCLUSION: This cementless design showed excellent preliminary outcomes in terms of fixation and patient satisfaction, comparable to that of other well-known similar systems.

Surgical Outcomes Following Fixation of Peri-Implant Distal Radius Fractures: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes following fixation of peri-implant distal radius fractures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of peri-implant distal radius fractures treated surgically at a large academic practice over 18 years. Patients were included if they had previously undergone open reduction and internal fixation of a distal radius fracture; subsequently sustained a fracture at, or adjacent to, the existing hardware; and then undergone revision fixation with the removal of hardware. Fractures were categorized into 3 groups: type A (distal to the implant), type B (at the level of the implant), and type C (proximal to the implant). Outcomes, including range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores, and radiographic alignment, were recorded at the latest follow-up visit. RESULTS: Twelve peri-implant distal radius fractures that had undergone revision surgical fixation were identified. At the time of injury, the average patient age was 63 years. Ten occurred around a volar plate, 1 occurred around an intramedullary device, and 1 occurred around a dorsal plate. One fracture occurred proximal to previous hardware (type C), 9 fractures occurred at the level of previous hardware (type B), and 2 fractures occurred distal to previous hardware (type A). The median time from initial fixation to peri-implant fracture was 2.7 years. At a mean follow-up of 6 months after the removal of the hardware and revision fixation, radiographic alignment was within acceptable parameters for all injuries. At the final follow-up, the average wrist motion for flexion, extension, supination, and pronation were 66°, 66°, 83°, and 86°, respectively. The average DASH score was 6.7. Three patients experienced complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although peri-implant fractures are infrequent complications following distal radius fracture internal fixation, outcomes of surgically treated peri-implant distal radius fractures are satisfactory with respect to radiographic alignment, range of motion, and function. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Osteosíntesis en fracturas femorales periprotésicas de cadera Vancouver tipos B1 y C. Análisis multicéntrico / Osteosynthesis in Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic hip fractures of the femur. A multicenter analysis

Introducción: Nuestro objetivo fue analizar los resultados del tratamiento con osteosíntesis en pacientes con fracturas Vancouver tipos B1 y C, evaluar las complicaciones, las reintervenciones y la tasa de mortalidad en este grupo. Materiales y métodos: Estudio multicéntrico, retrospectivo. Se estableció una base de datos que incluía a 53 pacientes con fracturas periprotésicas de fémur Vancouver tipos B1 y C tratadas con osteosíntesis, desde 2008 hasta 2021, en dos centros hospitalarios de alta complejidad. Resultados: La fijación proximal más utilizada fue con tornillos bicorticales más lazadas de alambre. El tipo de fractura según la clasificación de Vancouver se correlacionó con un valor significativo en el uso de tornillos de compresión interfragmentaria (p 0,001), con un total de 13 pacientes (24,52%), 9 en fracturas Vancouver tipo C. El tiempo de consolidación promedio fue de 4 meses, con un puntaje promedio del Harris Hip Score de 68. Doce pacientes (22,64%) tuvieron complicaciones: retraso de la consolidación (7 casos; 13,2%), falla de la osteosíntesis con trazo de fractura a nivel distal del tallo (un caso; 1,88%), una nueva osteosíntesis por falla a nivel del material de osteosíntesis (un caso; 1,88%) y tres fallecieron (5,66%). Conclusiones: El manejo de las fracturas femorales periprotésicas es un tema complejo y desafiante. El tratamiento con osteosíntesis constituye un método exitoso que requiere de la aplicación de principios actuales de técnicas mínimamente invasivas que, junto con una fijación proxi-mal estable, mejoran las posibilidades de éxito. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Introduction: Our objective was to analyze the results of osteosynthesis treatment in patients with Vancouver type B1 and C fractures, evaluate complications, reinterventions and the mortality rate in this group. Materials and methods: Multicenter, retrospective study. A database was established that included 53 patients with Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with osteosynthesis, from 2008 to 2021, who were evaluated in two high-complexity hospital centers. Results: The most used proximal fixation was bicortical screws and wire loops. The type of fracture according to the Vancouver classification correlated with a significant value in the use of interfragmentary compression screws (p 0.001), with a total of 13 patients (24.52%), 9 in Vancouver type C fractures. Mean consolidation was 4 months, with a mean Harris Hip Score of 68. Twelve patients (22.64%) had complications: delayed union (7 cases; 13.2%), failed osteosynthesis with fracture at the distal level of the stem (one case; 1.88%), one new osteosynthesis due to failure at the level of the osteosynthesis material (one case; 1.88%) and three patients died (5.66%). Conclusions: The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures is a complex and challenging issue. Osteosynthesis treatment is a successful method that requires the application of current principles of minimally invasive techniques that, together with stable proximal fixation, improve the chances of success. Level of Evidence: IV

Osteosíntesis con placa helicoidal en las fracturas de fémur distal / Helical plate osteosynthesis in distal femur fractures

Introducción: En pacientes con fracturas de fémur distal con alto grado de conminución metafisaria (AO 33 C2, C3) y fracturas periprotésicas (Vancouver tipo C), el uso de doble osteosíntesis brinda mayor estabilidad a la fractura. Las placas helicoidales se emplean cada vez más con el objetivo de evitar dañar elementos nobles relacionados con el abordaje. Materiales y métodos: Entre 2017 y 2021, seis pacientes fueron tratados mediante osteosíntesis con doble placa (por vía lateral y helicoidal por vía medial). La serie se compone de cuatro mujeres y dos hombres. El 66% (4 pacientes) tenía fracturas de fémur distal, y el resto (33%), fracturas periprotésicas tipo Vancouver C. Resultados: Se observó la consolidación radiográfica en todos los pacientes, a los 6 meses de la cirugía, con retorno normal a la actividad previa. Ninguno sufrió una lesión vasculonerviosa asociada. Conclusiones: La placa helicoidal es una gran opción para las fracturas de fémur distal con conminución y las fracturas femorales periprotésicas tipo Vancouver C. Esto demuestra que, aplicando los principios básicos de osteosíntesis, con una técnica sencilla, se pueden suplir materiales más sofisticados, y obtener resultados radiográficos similares. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Introduction: The use of double osteosynthesis for the treatment of fractures of the distal femur with metaphyseal comminution (AO 33C2, C3) and periprosthetic fractures (Vancouver C) provides greater stability. The use of helical plates has increased in or-der to avoid vascular damage related to the approach. Materials and methods: Between 2017 and 2021, six patients were treated by double plate osteosynthesis (helical plate by medial approach). The series consisted of four females and two males, 66% (4 patients) had distal femoral fractures, and the rest (33%, 2 patients) were diagnosed with Vancouver C periprosthetic fractures. Results: In all cases, radiographic consolidation was observed 6 months after surgery, with a normal return to activities of daily living. None of them presented an associated neurovascular injury. Conclusion: The helical plate is a great option in distal femur fractures and Vancouver C periprosthetic femoral fractures. By applying the basic principles of osteosynthesis, sophisticated ma-terials can be supplied, obtaining good clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes. Level of Evidence: IV

Selected Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished femoral components can be safely treated with osteosynthesis.

AIMS: We aimed to compare the implant survival, complications, readmissions, and mortality of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) treated with internal fixation with that of B1 PFFs treated with internal fixation and B2 fractures treated with revision arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 112 PFFs, of which 47 (42%) B1 and 27 (24%) B2 PFFs were treated with internal fixation, whereas 38 (34%) B2 fractures underwent revision arthroplasty. Decision to perform internal fixation for B2 PFFs was based on specific radiological (polished femoral components, intact bone-cement interface) and clinical criteria (low-demand patient). Median follow-up was 36.4 months (24 to 60). Implant survival and mortality over time were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (measured with a modified Dindo-Clavien classification) and 90-day readmissions were additionally compared between groups. RESULTS: In all, nine (8.01%) surgical failures were detected. All failures occurred within the first 24 months following surgery. The 24-month implant survival was 95.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 89.13 to 100) for B1 fractures treated with internal fixation, 90% (95% CI 76.86 to 100) for B2 PFFs treated with osteosynthesis-only, and 85.8% (95% CI 74.24 to 97.36) for B2 fractures treated with revision THA, without significant differences between groups (p = 0.296). Readmissions and major adverse events including mortality were overall high, but similar between groups (p > 0.05). The two-year patient survival rate was 87.1% (95% CI 77.49 to 95.76), 66.7% (95% CI 48.86 to 84.53), and 84.2% (95% CI 72.63 to 95.76), for the B1 group, B2 osteosynthesis group, and B2 revision group, respectively (p = 0.102). CONCLUSION: Implant survival in Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with internal fixation was similar to that of B1 fractures treated with the same method and to B2 PFFs treated with revision arthroplasty. Low-demand, elderly patients with B2 fractures around well-cemented polished femoral components with an intact bone-cement interface can be safely treated with internal fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1222-1230.

Tratamiento de las fracturas femorales periprotésicas Vancouver B3 con injerto óseo impactado. Supervivencia y complicaciones / Impaction bone grafting for the treatment of Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Survivorship and complication rate analysis

Objetivos: El tratamiento de elección para las fracturas femorales periprotésicas Vancouver B3 aún no está definido. Por este motivo, nos propusimos analizar la tasa de complicaciones de la técnica de injerto óseo impactado con un vástago cementado cuando se utiliza para tratar estas fracturas. Materiales y métodos: Estudiamos retrospectivamente 33 fracturas femorales periprotésicas B3 tratadas con la técnica de injerto óseo impactado operados entre 2000 y 2016, analizando la tasa de complicaciones. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 75 meses (RIC 36-111). La mediana de edad fue de 78 años (RIC 74-83). La mediana del defecto óseo femoral fue 3 (RIC 3-3) según la clasificación de la Endo-Klinik. Se realizó un análisis de regresión múltiple para determinar los factores de riesgo asociados a complicaciones, las variables incluidas fueron: cantidad de cirugías previas, diámetro de la nueva cabeza femoral y defecto óseo femoral. Resultados: Se realizó una cirugía de revisión en dos etapas en cuatro pacientes. Se registraron cinco fallas asépticas del implante y dos luxaciones en toda la serie. El análisis de regresión lineal multivariable mostró una asociación significativa entre el grado del defecto óseo femoral Endo-Klinik y la tasa de complicaciones (p = 0,04). Conclusión: La reconstrucción femoral con la técnica de injerto óseo impactado para tratar fracturas periprotésicas Vancouver B3 provocó una alta tasa de complicaciones. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Aims: Because the gold standard for the treatment of Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) is yet to be defined, we sought to analyze the complication rate of the impaction bone grafting (IBG) technique with a cemented stem for the treatment of this fractures. Materials and methods: We retrospectively studied 33 B3 PFFs treated with the IBG technique oper-ated between 2000 and 2016, analyzing the complication rate. The median follow-up was 75 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36-111). The median age was 78 years (IQR, 74-83). The median grade of EndoKlinik femoral bone defect was 3 (IQR, 3-3). Weperformed a multiple regression analysis to determine risk factors for complications, including the following variables: number ofprevious surgeries, femoral head diameter, and femoral bone defect. Results: As for infection outcomes, 2-stage revision surgerywas performed in 4 patients. We registered 5 implant failures and 2 dislocations in the whole series. Multiple regression analysisshowed a significant association between the grade of EndoKlinik femoral bone defect and complication rate (P=0.04). Conclu-sion: Femoral reconstruction with the IBG technique evidenced a high complication rate for the treatment of B3 PFF. Level of Evidence: IV

Obturator dislocation of total hip arthroplasty with disassembly of the prosthesis components and periprosthetic fracture in morbid obese patient.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior dislocation is a rare complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). There exist only three cases in the literature. None of them report disassembly of the prosthesis components. We present a morbidly obese woman who suffered an irreducible obturator dislocation of an infected total hip arthroplasty (THA), due to uncontrolled adduction during an early debridement surgery. Following unsuccessful closed reduction attempts, a Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fracture and disassembly of the prosthetic components were observed. Two-stage revision THA was necessary to resolve the infection and restore hip functionality. In obturator dislocation, the femoral head prosthetic can be trapped in the obturator foramen, and this may disassemble the prosthesis components during reduction maneuvers; theres also risk of periprosthetic fracture. This mandate an open reduction of the joint. Patient obesity could be a determining factor for this rare type of hip arthroplasty dislocation. Obturator dislocation is an extremely rare complication of the total hip arthroplasty, whose reductions should be handled with caution given the risks of periprosthetic fractures. In most cases, an open reduction of the joint is required. CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Our work is likely to be of great interest because it offers tips for the management of this rare complication based on our experience.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La luxación anterior es una complicación poco frecuente de la artroplastia total de cadera (ATC). Sólo existen tres casos en la literatura. Ninguno de ellos informa del desmontaje de los componentes de la prótesis. Presentamos el caso una mujer obesa que sufrió una luxación irreducible de una artroplastia total de cadera (THA), la cual estaba infectada, debido a la aducción no controlada durante una cirugía de desbridamiento temprano. Después de los intentos fallidos de reducción cerrada, se presentó una fractura periprotésica clasificada como Vancouver B2 y el desmontaje de los componentes protésicos. Ameritó cirugía de revisión en dos etapas, lo cual se realizó para resolver la infección y restaurar la funcionalidad de la cadera. En la luxación obturatriz, la cabeza femoral puede quedar atrapada en el agujero obturador y, como consecuencia, favorecer la disociación de los componentes protésicos al intentar la reducción, asimismo puede favorecer un brazo de palanca que produzca una fractura periprotésica. La obesidad puede ser un factor determinante para la producción de esta rara complicación. Por todo lo anterior, se recomienda considerar de entrada la reducción abierta. La luxación obturatriz es una complicación rara en la artroplastia total de cadera; su tratamiento puede ser difícil y asociarse a fracturas. La relevancia de este caso es que permite mostrar algunas estrategias de manejo para prevenir complicaciones catastróficas.

Contribution of the remaining attachment index in the management of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic hip fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Implant fixation assessment following Vancouver B1 periprosthetic hip fracture is a major decision factor for internal fixation and/or implant revision. The main aim of the present study was to assess the correlation between radiographic Remaining Attachment Index (RAI) and risk of implant loosening at last follow-up following internal fixation of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic hip fracture. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A multicentre retrospective study included 50 patients with Vancouver B1 periprosthetic hip fracture with uncemented femoral stem between 2013 and 2019. Preoperative radiographs were analysed independently by 2 senior orthopedic surgeons, distinguishing 2 groups: RAI>2/3 versus<2/3. Postoperative and last follow-up radiographs were then screened for signs of complete femoral component loosening. RESULTS: Median age was 89 years (range: 36-99 years). Two RAI>2/3 patients showed implant loosening (8%) versus 9 RAI<2/3 patients (36%), disclosing a significant correlation between early loosening and RAI<2/3 (p=0.005). Interobserver agreement for both radiographic RAI and radiographic loosening assessment at last follow-up was 98% with kappa correlation coefficient 0.96 [range: 0.88-1]. CONCLUSION: Remaining Attachment Index<2/3 in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic hip fracture was a risk factor for early implant loosening after isolated internal fixation. In these often frail elderly patients, first-line implant exchange is to be considered in the light of the risk/benefit ratio. The present results confirm the need for rigorous preoperative radiographic work-up of the remaining attachment area in Vancouver B1 fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Obturator dislocation of total hip arthroplasty with disassembly of the prosthesis components and periprosthetic fracture in morbid obese patient / Luxación obturatriz de una prótesis total de cadera con desensamblaje de los componentes y fractura periprotésica en un paciente obeso

Abstract: Introduction: Anterior dislocation is a rare complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). There exist only three cases in the literature. None of them report disassembly of the prosthesis components. We present a morbidly obese woman who suffered an irreducible obturator dislocation of an infected total hip arthroplasty (THA), due to uncontrolled adduction during an early debridement surgery. Following unsuccessful closed reduction attempts, a Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fracture and disassembly of the prosthetic components were observed. Two-stage revision THA was necessary to resolve the infection and restore hip functionality. In obturator dislocation, the femoral head prosthetic can be trapped in the obturator foramen, and this may disassemble the prosthesis components during reduction maneuvers; there's also risk of periprosthetic fracture. This mandate an open reduction of the joint. Patient obesity could be a determining factor for this rare type of hip arthroplasty dislocation. Obturator dislocation is an extremely rare complication of the total hip arthroplasty, whose reductions should be handled with caution given the risks of periprosthetic fractures. In most cases, an open reduction of the joint is required. Clinical importance: Our work is likely to be of great interest because it offers tips for the management of this rare complication based on our experience.

Resumen: Introducción: La luxación anterior es una complicación poco frecuente de la artroplastia total de cadera (ATC). Sólo existen tres casos en la literatura. Ninguno de ellos informa del desmontaje de los componentes de la prótesis. Presentamos el caso una mujer obesa que sufrió una luxación irreducible de una artroplastia total de cadera (THA), la cual estaba infectada, debido a la aducción no controlada durante una cirugía de desbridamiento temprano. Después de los intentos fallidos de reducción cerrada, se presentó una fractura periprotésica clasificada como Vancouver B2 y el desmontaje de los componentes protésicos. Ameritó cirugía de revisión en dos etapas, lo cual se realizó para resolver la infección y restaurar la funcionalidad de la cadera. En la luxación obturatriz, la cabeza femoral puede quedar atrapada en el agujero obturador y, como consecuencia, favorecer la disociación de los componentes protésicos al intentar la reducción, asimismo puede favorecer un brazo de palanca que produzca una fractura periprotésica. La obesidad puede ser un factor determinante para la producción de esta rara complicación. Por todo lo anterior, se recomienda considerar de entrada la reducción abierta. La luxación obturatriz es una complicación rara en la artroplastia total de cadera; su tratamiento puede ser difícil y asociarse a fracturas. La relevancia de este caso es que permite mostrar algunas estrategias de manejo para prevenir complicaciones catastróficas.

Setting Yourself Up for Success: Locked Plating in Periprosthetic Fractures About Total Knee Arthroplasty.

As the incidence of total knee arthroplasty increases, a concurrent increase in periprosthetic fractures will also occur. This article focuses on the most common fracture types and current strategies adopted to overcome this challenging clinical problem. Our goal is to outline the role of locking plates in the management of knee periprosthetic fractures.

Impaction Bone Grafting or Uncemented Modular Stems for the Treatment of Type B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures? A Complication Rate Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Because the gold standard for the treatment of Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) is yet to be defined, we sought to analyze the complication rate between the impaction bone grafting (IBG) technique with a cemented stem and reconstruction with an uncemented distally-fixed modular stem (DFMS). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 54 B3 PFFs operated between 2000 and 2016, comparing the complication rate of 33 patients treated with the IBG technique (group A) with 21 patients treated with a DFMS (group B). Median follow-up of groups A and B were 75 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36-111 months) and 55 months (IQR, 32-73 months), respectively (P = .008). Median age of groups A and B were 78 years (IQR, 74-83 years) and 81 years (IQR, 74-86 years), respectively (P = .30). Median grade of Endo-Klink femoral bone defect was 3 (IQR, 3-3) for both groups (P = .11). We performed a multiple regression analysis to determine risk factors for complications including the following variables: age, initial diagnosis, and surgical technique. RESULTS: As for infection outcomes, 2-stage revision surgery was more frequent in group A than in group B (4 vs 0, P = .003). Group A presented more implant failures than group B (5 vs 1, P = .195). We found 4 dislocations in group B and 2 in group A (P = .192). Multiple regression analysis showed a significant association between surgical technique and complication rate (P = .01). The IBG technique presented an odds risk for complications of 4.77 (P = .016; IQR, 1.33-17.21). CONCLUSION: Femoral reconstruction with the IBG technique evidenced an ostensibly higher complication rate than that of DFMS for the treatment of B3 PFF.

Is There Material Loss at the Conical Junctions of Modular Components for Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Clinical concern exists regarding fretting corrosion and material loss from taper junctions in orthopedic devices, with previous research focusing on the modular components from total hip arthroplasty. Comparatively little has been published regarding the fretting corrosion and material loss in modular knee devices. The purpose of this study is to evaluate fretting corrosion damage and quantify material loss for conical total knee arthroplasty taper interfaces. METHODS: Stem tapers of 166 retrieved modular knee devices were evaluated for fretting corrosion using a semiquantitative scoring method. High precision profilometry was then used to determine volumetric material loss and maximum wear depth for a subset of 37 components (implanted for 0.25-18.76 years). Scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were used to characterize the observed damage. RESULTS: Mild to severe fretting corrosion was observed on the majority of tapers, with 23% receiving a maximum visually determined damage score of 4. The median rate of volumetric material loss was 0.11 mm3/y (range 0.00-0.76) for femoral components (both cone and bore taper surfaces combined) and 0.01 mm3 (range 0.00-8.10) for tibial components. Greater rates of material loss were associated with mixed metal pairings. There was a strong correlation between visual fretting corrosion score and calculated material loss (ρ = 0.68, P < .001). Scanning electron microscopy revealed varying degrees of scratching, wear, fretting corrosion, and instances of cracking with morphology not consistent with fretting corrosion, wear, or fatigue. CONCLUSION: Although visual evidence of fretting corrosion damage was prevalent and correlated with taper material loss, the measured volumetric material loss was low compared with prior reports from total hip arthroplasty.

Mechanical Complications Following Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Surgical Approach: A Large, Single-Institution Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of surgical approach on risk of early postoperative mechanical complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to be a focus of debate. We performed the first single-institution study on risk of early operative and nonoperative mechanical complications after THA based on approach, with the hypothesis that there would be no clinically significant difference with modern surgical methods. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 16,186 consecutive THA performed from 2010 to 2016. Revision or conversion THA and cases performed for hip fracture, with recalled prostheses, or during a surgeon's learning period were excluded. THAs were performed using direct anterior (DA; n = 5465), direct lateral (DL; n = 8561), or posterolateral approach with soft tissue repair (PL; n = 2160). All mechanical complications within the first 2 years were identified. The primary analysis was a time to event Cox regression, accounting for both patient and surgeon characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with the DL approach, risk of mechanical complications was higher for both DA and PL. Adjusted risk of instability within 2 years was 0.17%, 0.74%, and 1.74% for DL, DA, and PL, respectively. While occurring at similar rates with the PL and DL approaches, the risk of periprosthetic fracture and loosening increased with DA. Consequently, femoral failure, including fracture or loosening, occurred more frequently for DA, with an adjusted incidence of 1.20% vs 0.58% and 0.47%, with DL and PL. CONCLUSION: Even with soft tissue repair, instability continues to occur with increased frequency with the PL approach. While reducing dislocation, a higher risk of femoral failure with DA must also be considered. Nevertheless, the DL approach appears to confer the lowest overall risk of mechanical complications.

[Review of femoral component with proximal metaphyseal reconstruction using allograft cortical struts in a multioperated patient. Case report]. / Revisión de componente femoral con reconstrucción metafisaria proximal con aloinjerto óseo en lajas en paciente multioperado. Reporte de caso.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic hip fractures are those that occur at the femoral and acetabular level. These fractures are associated with a wide variety of problems such as comminution, loose of bone stock and loosening of the femoral stem. Treatment of these fractures has historically been associated with high rates of treatment failures, complications and unsatisfactory outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To present the clinical-radiographic case of the treatment of a periprosthetic hip fracture, with a femoral revision and metaphyseal reconstruction with cortical strut allograft and cerclage cables, in a multioperated patient. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present the case of a patient with a dislocation of a revision total hip prosthesis with a periprosthetic fracture type B3 of the Vancouver classification, who underwent a revision of the femoral component and a proximal metaphyseal reconstruction of the femur with cortical strut allograft and cerclage cables. RESULTS: The patient had an adequate evolution at the postoperative year, walking with a cane, radiographic control with adequate congruence of the prosthetic components and data of consolidation of the fracture. DISCUSSION: In the treatment of periprosthetic fractures, reconstruction can be done with use of cortical strut allograft and cerclage cables, with good functional and radiological results.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las fracturas periprotésicas de cadera son aquéllas que ocurren a nivel femoral y acetabular. A estas fracturas se asocia una amplia variedad de problemas como la conminución, la pérdida ósea y con frecuencia el aflojamiento del vástago femoral. El tratamiento de estas fracturas ha estado históricamente asociado a altas tasas de fracasos del tratamiento, de complicaciones y de resultados insatisfactorios. OBJETIVO: Presentar el caso clínico-radiográfico del tratamiento de una fractura periprotésica con revisión femoral y reconstrucción metafisaria con lajas de cortical y cables de acero en un paciente multioperado. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se presenta el caso de un paciente con luxación de prótesis total de cadera izquierda de revisión + fractura periprotésica Vancouver B3, a quien se le realiza revisión de componente femoral y reconstrucción metafisaria proximal de fémur con aloinjerto óseo en lajas y fijación con cables de acero. RESULTADOS: El paciente cursa con adecuada evolución al año de postoperado, deambulando con apoyo de bastón, control radiográfico y adecuada congruencia de los componentes protésicos y datos de consolidación de la fractura. DISCUSIÓN: En el tratamiento de las fracturas periprotésicas es posible recurrir a la reconstrucción mediante el uso de aloinjertos en laja de cortical, cerclados con cables de acero, con buenos resultados funcionales y radiológicos.

Infection Following Total Joint Arthroplasty Is the Main Cause of Litigation: Data From One Metropolitan Area.

BACKGROUND: A prior survey of members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons revealed that 78% of responding surgeons were named as a defendant in at least 1 lawsuit, and 69% of these lawsuits were dismissed or settled out of court. The most common sources of litigation were nerve injury, limb-length discrepancy, and infection. This study examined common reasons for lawsuits after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in a single metropolitan area. METHODS: A retrospective review of lawsuits filed between 2009 and 2015 in a 5-county metropolitan area was performed, including 30 hospitals and 113 TJA surgeons. Complaints underwent a manual review to determine the number of lawsuits and the specific allegations filed against each surgeon. RESULTS: Thirty-one (27.4%) surgeons were named as a defendant in at least 1 lawsuit. Eighty-three total lawsuits were filed during the period, 50 of which were dismissed or settled outside of court. Top reasons for lawsuits were, in descending order, infection, nerve injury, chronic pain, vascular injury, periprosthetic fracture, retention of foreign body, dislocation, limb-length discrepancy, venous thromboembolism, loosening, compartment syndrome, and other medical complaints. CONCLUSION: Infection appears to be the basis of most lawsuits after TJA. Surgeons should be aware of the potential for a lawsuit for complications and should strive to better communicate with patients regarding preoperative informed consent and disclosure after adverse events. Surgeons should minimize performing surgery in patients at high risk of complications, such as patients with a higher likelihood of developing postoperative infection or patients on chronic pain medications.