Management of Blunt Chest Trauma.

Common mechanisms of blunt thoracic injury include motor vehicle collisions and falls. Chest wall injuries include rib fractures and sternal fractures; treatment involves supportive care, multimodal analgesia, and pulmonary toilet. Pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pulmonary contusions are also common and may be managed expectantly or with tube thoracostomy as indicated. Surgical treatment may be considered in select cases. Less common injury patterns include blunt trauma to the tracheobronchial tree, esophagus, diaphragm, heart, or aorta. Operative intervention is more often required to address these injuries.

External validation of novel Revised Intensity Battle Score and comparison of static rib fracture scoring systems.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare and externally validate the previously developed Revised Intensity Battle Score (RIBS) against other proposed scores for predicting poor outcomes after rib fractures. METHODS: An external validation set was assembled retrospectively, comprising 1,493 adult patients with one or more rib fractures admitted to a Level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2022. The following rib fracture scores were calculated for each patient: RIBS, Injury Severity Score, Rib Fracture Score, Chest Trauma Score, and Battle score. Each was investigated to assess utility in predicting mortality, intensive care unit upgrade, unplanned intubation and ventilator days. Performance was measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Of the 1,493 patients who met inclusion criteria, 239 patients (16%) experienced one of more of the investigated outcomes. Generally, scores performed best at predicting mortality and ventilator days. The RIBS stood out as best predicting "any complication" (AUC = 0.735) and ">7 ventilator days" (AUC = 0.771). CONCLUSION: The RIBS represents an externally validated triage score in patients with rib fractures and compares favorably to other static scoring systems. Use of this score as a triage tool may allow stratifying patients who may benefit from direct intensive care unit admission, neuraxial anesthesia and aggressive respiratory care. Next steps include prospective investigation of how pairing these interventions with score directed triage impacts outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Thoracic Emergencies for the General Surgeon.

In this review article, we aim to provide an overview of common and uncommon general surgery thoracic emergencies as well as basic thoracic anatomy, common diagnostic tests, and operative positioning and access considerations. We also describe specific thoracic procedures. We hope that this article simplifies some of the challenges associated with the management of thoracic emergencies.

[Reconstructive surgery for late complications after blunt chest wall trauma]. / Rekonstruktivno-vosstanovitel'nye vmeshatel'stva pri pozdnikh oslozhneniyakh zakrytoi travmy grudi.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence and structure of late complications after blunt chest trauma, feasibility of surgical correction and effectiveness of these interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 26 patients with late complications of blunt chest wall trauma. Severe chest deformities were diagnosed in 8 patients, non-union rib fracture - 5, pulmonary hernia - 4, chronic abscesses and pseudocysts of soft tissues of the chest - 3, osteomyelitis of the ribs - 3, chronic recurrent pulmonary bleeding following damage to lung parenchyma by rib fragments - 2, persistent post-traumatic pleuritis - in 1 patient. RESULTS: Among 26 patients, 23 ones underwent surgical correction of complications. Reconstructive procedures were performed in 5 out of 8 patients with post-traumatic chest deformities. In 5 patients with non-union rib fractures, surgery consisted of resection of ribs, excision of capsule and scar tissue, osteosynthesis. Thoracic pulmonary hernia required thoracotomy, viscerolysis, chest wall defect closure by bringing together the ribs and fixing with pulley sutures or ZipFix system. In 2 patients, pulmonary hernia was combined with non-union rib fracture. These patients underwent additional resection of false joints and osteosynthesis. Three patients were diagnosed with chronic abscesses and pseudocysts of soft tissues of the chest. Surgical treatment was carried out according to the principles of staged debridement of chronic purulent foci. Osteomyelitis of ribs in 3 patients required resection within intact tissues. Fixation of ribs by metal structures was not performed in these patients, and we performed only muscle and soft tissue repair. Conservative treatment was carried out in 3 patients with chest deformity. There were no lethal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Pathological syndromes in long-term period after blunt chest trauma require surgical correction. Surgical treatment of patients with late complications of chest trauma should be aimed at chest stabilization, improving respiratory function and preventing secondary and tertiary complications. Osteosynthesis allows not only to eliminate pathological syndromes, but also increase tolerance to physical activity and quality of life.

Diagnostic value of D-dimer for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis caused by rib fracture: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the role of D-dimer in the diagnosis of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients with rib fractures. METHOD: Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 499 patients with rib fractures who were admitted to the Third Hospital of Shijiazhuang between October 2020 and September 2021. These patients were divided into the DVT and the non-DVT groups. D-dimer levels were compared between the two groups at 24, 48, and 72 h after the injury. Receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of dynamically monitoring changes in D-dimer for DVT. RESULTS: The D-dimer levels in the DVT group were significantly higher than those in the non-DVT group at 24, 48, and 72 h after the injury. The area under the curve values for predicting DVT based on D-dimer level at 24, 48, and 72 h after injury in patients with rib fractures were 0.788, 0.605, and 0.568, respectively. CONCLUSION: Detecting D-dimer levels 24 h after the injury can enhance diagnostic efficacy and sensitivity for DVT, thereby reducing the rate of missed diagnoses, which is of great clinical value.

FasterRib: A deep learning algorithm to automate identification and characterization of rib fractures on chest computed tomography scans.

OBJECTIVE: Characterizing and enumerating rib fractures are critical to informing clinical decisions, yet in-depth characterization is rarely performed because of the manual burden of annotating these injuries on computed tomography (CT) scans. We hypothesized that our deep learning model, FasterRib , could predict the location and percentage displacement of rib fractures using chest CT scans. METHODS: The development and internal validation cohort comprised more than 4,700 annotated rib fractures from 500 chest CT scans within the public RibFrac. We trained a convolutional neural network to predict bounding boxes around each fracture per CT slice. Adapting an existing rib segmentation model, FasterRib outputs the three-dimensional locations of each fracture (rib number and laterality). A deterministic formula analyzed cortical contact between bone segments to compute percentage displacements. We externally validated our model on our institution's data set. RESULTS: FasterRib predicted precise rib fracture locations with 0.95 sensitivity, 0.90 precision, 0.92 f1 score, with an average of 1.3 false-positive fractures per scan. On external validation, FasterRib achieved 0.97 sensitivity, 0.96 precision, and 0.97 f1 score, and 2.24 false-positive fractures per scan. Our publicly available algorithm automatically outputs the location and percent displacement of each predicted rib fracture for multiple input CT scans. CONCLUSION: We built a deep learning algorithm that automates rib fracture detection and characterization using chest CT scans. FasterRib achieved the highest recall and the second highest precision among known algorithms in literature. Our open source code could facilitate FasterRib's adaptation for similar computer vision tasks and further improvements via large-scale external validation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests/Criteria; Level III.

Admission Forced Vital Capacity Adds a Predictive Physiologic Tool to Triage Patients Suffering Rib Fractures: A Prospective Observation Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rib fractures are at high risk for morbidity and mortality. This study prospectively examines bedside percent predicted forced vital capacity (% pFVC) in predicting complications for patients suffering multiple rib fractures. The authors hypothesize that increased % pFVC is associated with reduced pulmonary complications. METHODS: Adult patients with =3 rib fractures admitted to a level I trauma center, without cervical spinal cord injury or severe traumatic brain injury, were consecutively enrolled. FVC was measured at admission and % pFVC values were calculated for each patient. Patient were grouped by % pFVC <30% (low), 30-49% (moderate), and =50% (high). RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were enrolled. Percent pFVC groups were similar except for pneumothorax being most frequent in the low group (47.8% vs. 13.9% and 20.0%, p = .028). Pulmonary complications were infrequent and did not differ between groups (8.7% vs. 5.6% vs. 0%, p = .198). DISCUSSION: Increased % pFVC was associated with reduced hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) and increased time to discharge to home. Percent pFVC should be used in addition to other factors to risk stratify patients with multiple rib fractures. Bedside spirometry is a simple tool that can help guide management in resource-limited settings, especially in large-scale combat operations. CONCLUSION: This study prospectively demonstrates that % pFVC at admission represents an objective physiologic assessment that can be used to identify patients likely to require an increased level of hospital care.

Effectiveness of rib fixation compared to pain medication alone on pain control in patients with uncomplicated rib fractures: study protocol of a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial-the PAROS study (Pain After Rib OSteosynthesis).

BACKGROUND: Persistent pain and disability following rib fractures result in a large psycho-socio-economic impact for health-care system. Benefits of rib osteosynthesis are well documented in patients with flail chest that necessitates invasive ventilation. In patients with uncomplicated and simple rib fractures, indication for rib osteosynthesis is not clear. The aim of this trial is to compare pain at 2 months after rib osteosynthesis versus medical therapy. METHODS: This trial is a pragmatic multicenter, randomized, superiority, controlled, two-arm, not-blinded, trial that compares pain evolution between rib fixation and standard pain medication versus standard pain medication alone in patients with uncomplicated rib fractures. The study takes place in three hospitals of Thoracic Surgery of Western Switzerland. Primary outcome is pain measured by the brief pain inventory (BPI) questionnaire at 2 months post-surgery. The study includes follow-up assessments at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge. To be able to detect at least 2 point-difference on the BPI between both groups (standard deviation 2) with 90% power and two-sided 5% type I error, 46 patients per group are required. Adjusting for 10% drop-outs leads to 51 patients per group. DISCUSSION: Uncomplicated rib fractures have a significant medico-economic impact. Surgical treatment with rib fixation could result in better clinical recovery of patients with uncomplicated rib fractures. These improved outcomes could include less acute and chronic pain, improved pulmonary function and quality of life, and shorter return to work. Finally, surgical treatment could then result in less financial costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04745520 . Registered on 8 February 2021.

Heart injuries related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a risk often overlooked.

BACKGROUND: Current studies focus primarily on skeletal injuries following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Few studies report on intrathoracic injuries (ITI) and none, to our knowledge, focus exclusively on cardiovascular injuries related to cardiac massage. This study was based on autopsy findings and assessed the incidence of non-skeletal CPR related injuries related to chest compression. METHODS: This was a retrospective forensic autopsy cohort study conducted in a single institution after resuscitation. Pathologists recorded autopsy data using standardized protocol contained information from external and internal examination of the body. RESULTS: Thirty-eight autopsy reports (21 males and 17 females), post- CPR-failure were studied. Heart lesions were reported in 19 patients (group A). The average age was 65.7 years (69.05 group A and 66.5 group B). Median weight was 75.2 Kg and was significantly higher in group B (p = 0.01). Pericardial lesions were identified in 6 patients in group A and 2 in group B (p = 0.2 ns). No significant difference was observed among the two groups (Table 4) with the exception of the average number of rib fractures which was higher in group A (p = 0.04). Autopsy findings revealed heart injuries in 50% of patients with a high prevalence (52.6%) of left ventricle injuries. CONCLUSION: Cardiac lesions represent frequent and serious complications of unsuccessful CPR. Correct performance of chest compressions according to guidelines is the best way to avoid these complications.

Prospective validation of the Rib Injury Guidelines for traumatic rib fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The Rib Injury Guidelines (RIG) were developed to guide triage of traumatic rib fracture patients to home, regular floor, or intensive care unit (ICU) and standardize care. The RIG score is based on patient history, physical examination, and imaging findings. The aim of this study was to evaluate triage effectiveness and health care resources utilization following RIG implementation. METHODS: This is a prospective analysis at a level I trauma center from October 2017 to January 2020. Adult (18 years or older) blunt trauma patients with a diagnosis of at least one rib fracture on computed tomography imaging were included. Patients before (PRE) and after (POST) implementation of RIG were compared. In the POST group, patients were divided into RIG 1, RIG 2, and RIG 3 based on their RIG score. Outcomes were readmission for RIG 1 patients, unplanned ICU admission for RIG 2 patients, and overall ICU admission. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,100 patients were identified (PRE, 754; POST, 346). Mean ± SD age was 56 ± 19 years, 788 (71.6%) were male, and median Injury Severity Score was 14 (range, 10-22). The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (554 [50.3%]), 253 patients (22.9%) had ≥5 rib fractures, and 53 patients (4.8%) had a flail chest. In the POST group, 74 patients (21.1%) were RIG 1; 121 (35.2%), RIG 2; and 151 (43.7%), RIG 3. No patient in RIG 1 was readmitted following initial discharge, and two patients (1.6%) in RIG 2 had an unplanned ICU admission (both for alcohol withdrawal syndrome). Patients after implementation of RIG had shorter hospital LOS (3 [1-6] vs. 4 [1-7] days; p = 0.019) and no difference in mortality (5.8% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.252). On multivariate analysis, RIG implementation was associated with decreased ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55 [0.36-0.82]; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Rib Injury Guidelines are safe and effectively define triage of rib fracture patients with an overall reduction in ICU admissions, shorter hospital LOS, and no readmissions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Utilization of Percentage of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity to Stratify Rib Fracture Patients: An Updated Clinical Practice Guideline.

BACKGROUND: Rib fractures are the most common injuries diagnosed after blunt thoracic trauma and are a source of significant morbidity and mortality. Early identification of at-risk patients and initiation of effective analgesia are keys to mitigating complications from these injuries. Multiple tools exist to predict pulmonary decompensation after rib fractures; however, none has found a widespread acceptance. A clinical practice guideline (CPG) utilizing Forced vital capacity (FVC) has been in place at a single institution. The goal of this study is to update the CPG to use percentage of predicted FVC (FVC%) instead of FVC to triage patients with rib fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 266 patients with rib fractures was conducted. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on FVC of <1000 mL, 1001-1500 mL, or >1500 mL for analysis. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance, and Youden's J Index was used to identify inflection points. RESULTS: Patients in the high-risk category were more likely to be women, older than 65 years, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), transferred to the ICU, require intubation, and have overall longer hospital and ICU stays. The updated CPG triage cutoffs for admission to ICU, stepdown, and floor were redefined as FVC% values of <25%, 25-45%, and >45%, respectively. DISCUSSION: The updated CPG using FVC% may more accurately identify patients with compromised physiology and be a better tool to help predict patients who are at risk for decompensation following rib fractures. A validation study for the updated CPG is in progress.

Utilizing triage rates to improve ICU admission guidelines of elderly rib fracture patients.

BACKGROUND: Elderly rib fracture patients are generally admitted to an ICU which may result in overutilization of scarce resources. We hypothesized that this practice results in significant overtriage. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients over age 70 with acute rib fracture(s) as sole indication for ICU admission. Primary outcomes were adverse events (intubation, pneumonia, death), which we classified as meriting ICU admission. We utilized Cribari matrices to calculate triage rates. RESULTS: 101 patients met study criteria. 12% had adverse events occurring on average at day 5. Our undertriage rate was 6% and overtriage rate 87%. The 72 overtriaged patients utilized 295 total ICU days. Evaluating guideline modification, ≥3 fractures appears optimal. Changing to this would have liberated 50 ICU days with 3% undertriage. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with small numbers of rib fractures are overtriaged to ICUs. Modifying guidelines to ≥3 rib fractures will improve resource utilization and save ICU beds.

A Rare Case of Rib Fractures During Centrifuge Training.

There are several injuries potentially related to high-G exposure, including neck and back pain, spinal fractures, and pneumomediastinum. We present a young military pilot diagnosed with isolated fractures of the right 9th and 10th ribs via X-ray after high-G exposure (maximum G level: 9G). This patient presented with progressive and localized pain in the right anterior chest and flank region. After conservative treatment with rest and pain management, he recovered from the rib fractures and completed all profile challenges in the advanced high-G training program. A review of the annual health examination of the pilot did not show any rib lesions or other related illnesses. He was qualified for flying class II and considered fit for flight training. His medication history was unremarkable, and he did not have a family history of malignancy, osteoporosis, or osteopenia. He also denied having previously experienced trauma of the rib cage or participated in any strenuous military training program or exercise before centrifuge training. The potential explanations for the multiple rib fractures are repetitive stress from the anti-G straining maneuver and anti-G suit compression of the abdominal bladder. To our knowledge, consecutive rib fractures related to high-G exposure have never been documented. This report may increase the awareness of flight surgeons and training units regarding the risk of chest wall injuries during high-G exposure and encourage them to use multiple diagnostic tools to determine the correct diagnosis.

Complete Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Rib Fractures: Series of 35 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for internal fixation of rib fractures is a promising approach for treating rib fractures and flail chest. Currently the standard practice is to make 1 or several incisions on the chest wall, which will inevitably aggravate the original trauma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with rib fractures who were treated with memory alloy for internal fixation by complete VATS using a thoracoscopic transthoracic memory alloy rib coaptation board and an implantation tool through the clip applier method or the puncture, traction, and suspension method at our hospital from October 2016 to June 2019. RESULTS: Of 35 patients, 12 had traumatic flail chest injury and 23 had simple multiple rib fractures. Of the 23 patients with multiple rib fractures, 9 had fracture ends in the scapular or paravertebral region and 14 in the anterior or lateral chest walls. All surgeries were performed with complete VATS, which showed quick recovery and good thoracic appearance and function, with no complications for all patients. Follow-up for 6 to 24 months revealed no detachment of the internal fixation device. CONCLUSIONS: Internal memory alloy fixation with complete VATS for the treatment of rib fractures is a simple and minimally invasive method that enables fixing fractured ribs internally while treating thoracic trauma with a thoracoscope.

Rib fracture detection system based on deep learning.

Rib fracture detection is time-consuming and demanding work for radiologists. This study aimed to introduce a novel rib fracture detection system based on deep learning which can help radiologists to diagnose rib fractures in chest computer tomography (CT) images conveniently and accurately. A total of 1707 patients were included in this study from a single center. We developed a novel rib fracture detection system on chest CT using a three-step algorithm. According to the examination time, 1507, 100 and 100 patients were allocated to the training set, the validation set and the testing set, respectively. Free Response ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the sensitivity and false positivity of the deep learning algorithm. Precision, recall, F1-score, negative predictive value (NPV) and detection and diagnosis were selected as evaluation metrics to compare the diagnostic efficiency of this system with radiologists. The radiologist-only study was used as a benchmark and the radiologist-model collaboration study was evaluated to assess the model's clinical applicability. A total of 50,170,399 blocks (fracture blocks, 91,574; normal blocks, 50,078,825) were labelled for training. The F1-score of the Rib Fracture Detection System was 0.890 and the precision, recall and NPV values were 0.869, 0.913 and 0.969, respectively. By interacting with this detection system, the F1-score of the junior and the experienced radiologists had improved from 0.796 to 0.925 and 0.889 to 0.970, respectively; the recall scores had increased from 0.693 to 0.920 and 0.853 to 0.972, respectively. On average, the diagnosis time of radiologist assisted with this detection system was reduced by 65.3 s. The constructed Rib Fracture Detection System has a comparable performance with the experienced radiologist and is readily available to automatically detect rib fracture in the clinical setting with high efficacy, which could reduce diagnosis time and radiologists' workload in the clinical practice.

Improving Blunt Chest Wall Injury Outcomes: Introducing the PIC Score.

BACKGROUND: To improve care for nonintubated blunt chest wall injury patients, our Level I trauma center developed a treatment protocol and a pulmonary evaluation tool named "PIC Protocol" and "PIC Score," emphasizing continual assessment of pain, incentive spirometry, and cough ability. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to reduce unplanned intensive care unit admissions for blunt chest wall injury patients using the PIC Protocol and the PIC Score. Additional outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days, length of hospital stay, inhospital mortality, and discharge destination. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes of rib fracture patients treated at our facility 2 years prior to (control group) and 2 years following PIC Protocol use (PIC group). The protocol included admission screening, a power plan order set, the PIC Score patient assessment tool, in-room communication board, and patient education brochure. Outcomes were compared using independent-samples t tests for continuous variables and Pearson's χ2 for categorical variables with α set to p < .05. RESULTS: There were 1,036 patients in the study (control = 501; PIC = 535). Demographics and injury severity were similar between groups. Unanticipated escalations of care for acute pulmonary distress were reduced from 3% (15/501) in the control group to 0.37% (2/535) in the PIC group and were predicted by a preceding fall in the PIC Score of 3 points over the previous 8-hr shift, marking pulmonary decline by an acutely falling PIC Score. CONCLUSIONS: The PIC Protocol and the PIC Score are easy-to-use, cost-effective tools for guiding care of blunt chest wall injury patients.

Surgical rib fixation as an alternative method of treatment for multiple rib fractures: an audit of results compared with traditional medical management.

BACKGROUND: Rib fractures are a common cause of morbidity and chronic pain, delaying return to normal activities. Reports suggest that surgical fixation improves acute and long-term outcomes. METHODS: A single centre retrospective review of multiple rib fractures, comparing the outcomes of cases managed using surgical fixation with cases managed only with best medical therapy (BMT) over 2 years. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with rib fractures were admitted over the study period. The most common causes of rib fractures were motorcycle crashes (34.2%) and falls (31.4%). Fourteen patients had surgery. There were no differences between the two groups regarding the number of fractured ribs, injury severity score (ISS), ICU or hospital length of stay. The median numeric pain visual analogue scale (VAS) on admission was eight points for non-ventilated patients. In the surgical group the median VAS significantly fell to a median of 2 points in the first 24 hours after surgery (p = 0.04). Only two out of 25 major complications were directly attributable to the surgery for rib fixation. Patients managed without surgery needed significantly longer time to return to normal activities compared to those who had surgery (median 7 weeks versus 3 weeks, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest that rib fixation should be considered a treatment alternative in patients with multiple rib fractures.

Evaluation of Patient Information Material in the Consent Process for Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures is a procedure carried out in most trauma centers; however, data on evaluation of patient information material regarding this procedure are limited. The trauma service at our hospital implemented slide presentation as an adjunct tool to the consenting process for patients undergoing this procedure. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate information material for patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures procedure and subjective outcomes from education on components of knowledge, emotion, and behavior for patients undergoing this procedure. METHODS: A one-group posttest prospective design study was conducted over 18 months at a Level I trauma center. Supplementary visual material was provided as an adjunct to the consent process of surgical rib fixation. Evaluation from the patient's perspective was undertaken utilizing the usefulness scale for patient information material. This tool was based on a tripartite model of reading, evaluating, and responding to patient information material. RESULTS: Over the period of 18 months, 60 patients underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures. Fifty-two (91.7%) patients reviewed the information material, and 41 (78.8%) patients completed the feedback. The results reflect that the majority of patients perceived positive responses in emotional support (M = 8.42, SD = 6.6); behavioral motivation (M = 8.57, SD = 6.4); and education on knowledge (M = 9.09, SD = 4.6). CONCLUSION: In this novel study, visual aids as an adjunct to the informed consent process augmented patient knowledge regarding surgical stabilization of rib fractures and received positive subjective patient feedback on knowledge about the procedure.