Achieving Bone Healing Non-Operatively in Humeral Fractures in Two Patients with Risk Factors for Nonunion Utilizing a Specialized Orthosis.

We report the treatment of two patient with humeral fractures with one or more risk factors for nonunion. The first patient was elderly with a previously diagnosed central nervous sys-tem injury. The second elderly patient previously sustained a cerebral vascular accident affecting the fractured arm. The fracture was oblique in the proximal third of the humerus. We achieved bone healing non-operatively utilizing a spe-cialized plastic orthosis that included a deforming element made of dense foam. This device asymmetrically increases the soft tissue pressure around the fracture.

Postoperative malrotation of humerus shaft fracture causes degeneration of rotator cuff and cartilage.

We hypothesized that postoperative malrotation of humeral shaft fractures can alter the bio-mechanical environment of the shoulder; thus, rotator cuff and cartilage degeneration could be induced. Therefore, we designed an animal experiment to evaluate the impact of malrotation deformities after minimally invasive surgery for humeral fractures on the rotator cuff and cartilage, which has rarely been described in previous studies. Twenty-four New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into the sham control group (A), negative control group (B) and malrotated group (C). A sham operation with surgical exposure alone was performed in group A. Humeral shaft osteotomy was performed in Group B and C. In Group B, the fractures were fixed in situ with plate -screw system. While in Group C, iatrogenic rotational deformity was created after the proximal end of the fracture being internally rotated by 20 degrees and then subsequently fixed. The animals with bone healing were sacrificed for pathological and biochemical examination. In group C, the modified Mankin scale for cartilage pathology evaluation and the modified Movin scale for tendon both showed highest score among groups with statistical significance (P < 0.05); Disordered alignment and proportion of collagen I/III of rotator cuff were confirmed with picrosirius red staining; Transmission electron microscopy also showed ultrastructural tendon damage. Immunohistochemistry showed that both MMP-1 and MMP-13 expression were significantly higher in group C than groups A and B(P < 0.05). Minimally invasive techniques for humerus shaft fracture might be cosmetically advantageous, but the consequent postoperative malrotation could increase the risk of rotator cuff and cartilage degeneration. This conclusion is supported here by primary evidence from animal experiments.

Modified Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Kirschner Wires Internal Fixation for Treatment of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children.

OBJECTIVE: Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most frequent fractures of the paediatric elbow. The present study introduced a modified surgical procedure for treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. METHODS: From February 2015 to August 2019, 73 patients with Gartland's type II and III supracondylar fractures were treated with this modified method. Totally, 68 of all patients were followed up for 3-12 months (mean 8.25 months). The evaluation results included fracture nonunion, ulnar nerve injury, pin track infection, carrying angle and elbow joint Flynn score. RESULTS: The results showed that bone union was observed in all children, one case had an iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, and the symptoms were completely relieved in 4 months after removing of the medial-side pin. All children had no cubitus varus deformity and no pin track infection, and the rate of satisfactory results according to Flynn's criteria score was 100%. CONCLUSION: The modified closed reduction and Kirschner wires internal fixation could effectively reduce the rate of open reduction, the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, and the incidence of cubitus varus deformity in treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children.

Location of the radial nerve along the humeral shaft between the prone and lateral decubitus positions at different elbow positions.

Identification of the radial nerve is important during the posterior approach to a humerus fracture. During this procedure, the patient can be placed in the prone or lateral decubitus position depending on the surgeon's preference. The distance from the radial nerve to the osseous structures will be different in each position. The purpose of this study was to identify the safety zones in various patient and elbow flexion positions. The distances from the olecranon to the center of the radial groove and intermuscular septum and lateral epicondyle to the lateral intermuscular septum were measured using a digital Vernier caliper. The measurements were performed with cadavers in the lateral decubitus and prone positions at different elbow flexion angles. The distance from where the radial nerve crossed the posterior aspect of the humerus measured from the upper part of the olecranon to the center of the radial nerve in both positions at different elbow flexion angles varied from a mean maximum distance of 130.00 mm with the elbow in full extension in the prone position to a minimum distance of 121.01 mm with the elbow in flexion at 120° in the lateral decubitus position. The mean distance of the radial nerve from the upper olecranon to the lateral intermuscular septum varied from 107.13 to 102.22 mm. The distance from the lateral epicondyle to the lateral edge of the radial nerve varied from 119.92 to 125.38 mm. There was not significant contrast in the position of the radial nerve with osseous landmarks concerning different degrees of flexion, except for 120°, which is not significant, as this flexion angle is rarely used.

Lateral entry pins and Slongo's external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures?

OBJECTIVE: The standard surgical treatment for supracondylar humeral fractures in children is closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Given the need for greater fixation strength and higher risk of joint stiffness for children older than 8 years, external fixation is often performed for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in older children. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of lateral entry pins and Slongo's external fixation for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in older children. METHODS: Children older than 8 years who underwent surgery for supracondylar humeral fractures at our hospital for surgery from January 2016 to December 2020 are to be retrospectively assessed. One group (n = 36) underwent internal fixation and percutaneous pinning with three lateral Kirschner wires, and the other group (n = 32) underwent Slongo's external fixator surgery. The demographic data, operation duration, number of fluoroscopies, and fracture healing time were compared between both groups. The elbow joint function was evaluated 6 months after the surgery on the basis of fracture healing time, lifting angle, elbow joint range of motion (ROM), and Flynn score. The incidence of postoperative complications was also recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two patient groups in terms of the demographic parameters. Compared to external fixation surgery, Kirschner wire surgery required shorter duration and fewer fluoroscopies (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, the fracture healing time was significantly less (P < 0.05), and the elbow ROM and Flynn scores were higher in the external fixator group compared to the Kirschner wire fixation group (P < 0.05). There was one case of secondary fracture displacement in the Kirschner wire group and one of pin tract infection in the external fixator group. No other iatrogenic injuries or complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Maybe Slongo's external fixator is a suitable alternative treatment option for supracondylar humeral fractures in children older than 8 years since it can achieve better fixation strength and early restoration of elbow joint movement with a lower risk of joint stiffness.

Therapeutic analysis of Herbert screw fixation for capitellar fractures via the anterior approach in adolescent patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy of open reduction and Herbert screw fixation for coronal fractures of the capitellum via the anterior approach in adolescents. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of 15 adolescents with capitellar fractures who were admitted to our hospital from May 2014 to May 2019. The fracture was reduced through the cubital crease incision via the anterior approach and was internally fixated with Herbert screws. A follow-up was conducted after the operation to examine fracture healing and elbow function. The postoperative functional recovery of patients was evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance index (MEPI) and the Broberg-Morrey rating system. RESULTS: Patients underwent surgery 3.7 days after injury on average. Intraoperative fracture reduction was satisfactory. No vascular injury or nerve injury occurred. Bony union occurred in an average of 6 weeks after the operation. All adolescents completed a 12- to 36-month follow-up. At the last follow-up, the Mayo Elbow Performance index was considered excellent in 12 patients and good in three patients. The Broberg-Morrey score was considered excellent in 12 patients, good in two patients, and fair in one patient. CONCLUSION: Open reduction with Herbert screw fixation via the anterior approach is a feasible surgical method for the treatment of coronal fractures of the capitellum in adolescents. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, retrospective study-Level IV.

InSafeLOCK® humeral nailing for humeral nonunions: Clinical and radiological results.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the clinical and functional results of patients treated with InSafeLOCK® humeral nail and iliac crest autograft for humeral nonunion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 15 patients (11 males, 4 females; mean age: 52.1±15.3 years; range, 31 to 78 years) who were followed conservatively for humeral fractures and operated with the InSafeLOCK® humeral nail and iliac bone graft in our center between June 2018 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, operative data, and pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and Constant-Murley Scores (CMS) were recorded. RESULTS: The mean time from injury to nonunion treatment was 10.9±1.6 months. Five patients had atrophic, eight patients had oligotrophic, and two patients had hypertrophic nonunion. Preoperatively, the mean DASH was 37.7±9.1, the mean CMS was 69.7±6.3, and the mean VAS was 3.8±0.7. In all patients, union was achieved. The mean operation time was 59.0±16.2 min. The mean postoperative DASH score was 16.1±8.7, CMS 87.4±3.4, and VAS score 0.8±0.7. Regarding the shoulder joint, the mean abduction was 164.7±11.3 degrees, the mean internal rotation was 82.0±6.8 degrees, the mean external rotation was 81.3±8.3 degrees, and the mean flexion was 162.0±12.1 degrees. During follow-up, complications such as vascular-nerve injury, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, screw migration or loosening, implant failure, and loss of reduction did not occur in any of our patients. CONCLUSION: Considering the satisfactory functional and radiological results, the InSafeLOCK® humeral nail can be used safely in humeral nonunions.

Characteristics of Cubitus Varus Deformity after Lateral Condylar Fracture of the Humerus.

Background: Lateral humeral condylar fractures often heal with some residual elbow deformity. However, details of angulation or tilting angle of the lateral condyle after the fracture have not been evaluated so far. Methods: Between 2008 and 2016, we followed up 80 mild fractures of the lateral humeral condyle for more than a year. Thirty fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with Kirschner wires. Fifty cases were treated with a long arm splint for 3 weeks (Fig. 1). The average age of the patients at the time of the injury was 5.5 years. The humerus-elbow-wrist angle (HEWA), Baumann's angle (BA), and tilting angle (TA) were measured on the radiographs. The active range of motion (ROM) was clinically assessed at unaffected and affected sides at the final follow-up. Results: No significant differences were detected between the sides about TA or ROM at the final follow-up. However, HEWA/ BA showed more significant loss of correction. There were significant differences in BA at the affected side between the ORIF and splint groups. Conclusions: Cubitus varus deformity after lateral humeral condylar fracture is not accompanied by a change in TA or ROM, unlike the deformity after supracondylar or distal epiphyseal fracture of the humerus (Fig. 2). Operative treatment to precisely correct and fix the lateral condylar fracture still retained some cubitus varus deformity, although it might lessen or prevent the deformity when compared to conservative treatment with a splint.

Repurposing denosumab for recalcitrant bone healing.

Fracture healing has four phases: haematoma formation, soft callus, hard callus and remodelling. Often, non-healing fractures have an arrest of one of these phases, which need resurgery. We have repurposed denosumab for impaired fracture healing cases to avoid surgical intervention. Here, we report a series of three cases of impaired fracture healing where denosumab was given 120 mg subcutaneous dosages for 3 months to enhance healing. All the three cases have shown complete bone union at a mean follow-up of 6.7 months (5-9 months) as assessed clinically and radiologically, and have observed no adverse effect of the therapy. Denosumab given in this dose aids fracture healing by increasing callus volume, density and bridges the fracture gap in recalcitrant fracture healing cases where the callus fails to consolidate.

Determining the stability of minimally displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures in children: ultrasound is better than arthrography.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating of the articular cartilage status of the distal humeral epiphysis is difficult. Ultrasound imaging of the elbow is increasingly being used to confirm the integrity of the articular cartilage of minimally displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures in children with minimally displaced fractures. The aims of this study were to assess the correlations between ultrasound and arthrography findings for predicting the integrity of the cartilage hinge and to describe the utility of ultrasound in determining the need for pre-treatment. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with minimally displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures who underwent ultrasound and arthrography examinations before surgery from May 2018 to December 2019 were included in this study. Ultrasound and arthrography predictors of the cartilage hinge status were independently measured. The ultrasound and arthrography results were compared. RESULTS: The mean displacement of the fractures was 3.1 mm (range, 2.0~5.0 mm). Arthrography showed incomplete fractures in 24 patients (61.5%) and complete fractures in 15 patients (38.5%). Ultrasound showed incomplete fractures in 25 patients (64.1%) and complete fractures in 14 patients (35.9%). The ultrasound and arthrography results of the integrity of the articular surface were consistent in 92.3% of the cases, including 23 that were predicted to have an intact articular surface and 13 that were predicted to have an incongruity articular surface. There was no correlation between the displacement and the fracture appearing complete on the ultrasound scan. The Pearson coefficient between ultrasound and arthrography for assessing the integrity of the articular surface was 0.837. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound and arthrography assessments of the integrity of the cartilage hinge status appear to be highly consistent. Ultrasound can be used as a complementary tool with arthrography to predict the integrity of the cartilage hinge status in children with minimally displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective study; level II.

Lateral Condyle Fracture of the Humerus in Children: Kirschner Wire or Screw Fixation?

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of the displaced fracture of the lateral condyle of the distal humerus in children aims not only to avoid nonunion, malalignment, and impairment of the range of motion of the elbow but also to prevent delayed healing and the development of any prearthrotic deformity. To date there is no agreement on what kind of osteosynthesis should be used. So far, the screw fixation and Kirschner wire fixation have both been applied. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare the outcome of these two methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken including 43 patients aged 2 to 13 years who underwent osteosynthesis for a condylar fracture of the humerus over a period of 10 years. The electronic archive, including the radiological diagnostics, was analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0. Statistical significance was set at an α level of p = 0.05. RESULTS: Kirschner wire fixation was performed in 48.9% of condylar fractures of the humerus while screw fixation (alone or in combination with a pin) was assessed with a percentage of 51.1% of the cases in this study. Screw fixation only was applied in 20.9% of fractures of the lateral condyle. The selection of the method was independent of the age of the patient (p = 0.2). The comparison of the rate of complications and an impaired range of motion after Kirschner wire osteosynthesis to the rate after screw osteosynthesis showed a significantly lower percentage for the Kirschner wire group (p = 0.046). No case of nonunion, nerve palsy, or pin migration was detected in any patient in this study. CONCLUSION: Kirschner wire fixation of condylar humeral fractures in children resulted in a lower rate of complications than screw fixation. No case of nonunion of the fracture was found in the patients that we investigated so that we conclude that Kirschner wires sufficiently adapt the fracture in these cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Arthroscopic fixation of humeral greater tuberosity fracture using a W-shaped suture.

BACKGROUND: Patients with greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus often require surgery. Therefore, there is a need to find a minimally invasive and effective surgical procedure with great patient outcomes. AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the W-shaped suture technique under shoulder arthroscopy in the treatment of greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus. METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 17 patients were included. The fractures were closed, and there was no neurovascular injury. These patients underwent arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation of the greater tuberosity fractures. Fixation was performed using sighting nails combined with a W-shaped suture. The imaging data of the patients were collected, and the ASES score, Constant-Murley score, and VAS score were used to evaluate the patient's outcome. At the last follow-up (at least 1 year), the range of motion in the affected shoulder was compared with that of the contralateral side. RESULTS: The operation was successful in all the patients. The average follow-up time was 13 months. There were no reported complications such as fracture displacement, nonunion, and internal fixation failure during the follow-up period. Post-operative X-ray examinations revealed good function recovery, with a healing time of between 10 and 12 weeks, and an average healing time of 11.5 weeks. Following the operation, patients reported reduced shoulder joint pain that no longer influenced their activity or caused discomfort in their daily life. The patient's VAS score ranged from 0 to 3, with an average of 0.52 ± 0.73, while at the last follow-up, the Constant-Murley score ranged from 83 to 97, with an average of 92.33 ± 7.55. The ASES score ranged from 81 to 98, with an average of 93.15 ± 6.93. At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the overall range of motion with the unaffected limb. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the W-shaped suture can be used to effectively fix the fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus, by increasing the fixed area to promote healing.

Comparison of the Posterior and Anterolateral Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Humeral Mid-Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess and compare the functional outcomes and complications following anterolateral versus posterior surgical approaches for the treatment of mid-shaft fractures of the humerus. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study included 107 patients treated for mid-shaft fractures between May 2015 and July 2018. Demographic and surgical data were collected for each patient. During follow-up visits, radiographs were acquired and evaluated. The clinical outcomes of the involved joints were assessed by the Constant scoring system, range of motion (ROM), and the Mayo Elbow Performance Scoring system at the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS The posterior approach was performed in 57 patients with type A fractures (group I, n=28) and type B or C fractures (group III, n=29). The anterolateral approach was performed in 50 patients with type A fractures (group II, n=32) and type B or C fractures (group IV, n=18). There were no significant differences between group I and group II nor between group III and group IV with respect to patient demographic data, surgical data, Constant score, ROM, or Mayo Elbow Performance score. A significant difference in the total complication rate was observed between group I and II. CONCLUSIONS The anterolateral approach showed an advantage over the posterior approach for treating simple humeral mid-shaft fractures. However, this advantage was not observed in treating comminuted fractures.

Tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas periprotésicas de húmero y algoritmo de actuación / Surgical treatment of periprosthetic humerus fractures and algorithm

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las fracturas periprotésicas de húmero son infrecuentes y su manejo, difícil. La bibliografía es limitada y no existe consenso sobre su tratamiento. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Hemos realizado un estudio observacional retrospectivo de 10pacientes con fractura periprotésica de húmero con un seguimiento de 25,1 meses (6-87). Valoramos los resultados clínicos, radiológicos y funcionales, como las complicaciones. Utilizamos el cuestionario Quick-DASH y UCLA Shoulder Score (UCLASS). Realizamos una búsqueda sistemática para comparar la serie presentada y los protocolos de tratamiento publicados. RESULTADOS: Diez pacientes con una media de edad de 69,4 años (37-91) fueron intervenidos quirúrgicamente: 8 mediante reducción abierta y fijación interna (RAFI), en otro se realizó un recambio protésico colocando una nueva prótesis con un vástago más largo, y en el último se retiró la prótesis y se realizó una osteosíntesis con un clavo endomedular. Nueve de 10 pacientes consolidaron en un tiempo de 6,2 meses (rango 5-12); el restante sufrió una nueva fractura 5 meses después, siendo reintervenido, realizándole una nueva osteosíntesis, con aporte de aloinjerto óseo, que consolidó a los 8meses de la última fractura. En relación con la situación previa a la fractura, los pacientes tenían como promedio un descenso notable de la función, que era de 10,66 puntos en el test de UCLASS y un ascenso de 27,3 puntos en el cuestionario Quick-DASH. CONCLUSIONES: Nuestra serie tiene similitudes con las publicadas en relación con los aspectos demográficos, las complicaciones y el tiempo de consolidación. Sin embargo, en otros aspectos, como el dolor y los resultados funcionales, encontramos gran variabilidad

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic humerus fractures are infrequent and sometimes difficult to treat. There is limited literature and no consensus on the handling of these fractures. The objective of this study was to compare our results with those published in the literature, in order to improve our care and propose a management algorithm. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Observational study of 10 cases of periprosthetic humerus fractures with a mean follow-up of the patients of 23 months. An analysis of sociodemographic, radiological and surgical variables was performed. They were reviewed clinically and by telephone using the UCLA Shoulder Score and Quick-DASH scales. A systematic search was made in Pubmed for periprosthetic humerus fractures, for a literature review with which to compare our series. RESULTS: We analysed 10 patients with an average age of 69.4 years (37-91). Of the patients, 90% underwent surgery through open reduction and internal fixation. Nine of the ten patients consolidated in a mean time of 6.2months (range 5-12), the remaining suffered a new fracture 5 months after the intervention, who were reoperated and a new osteosynthesis performed with bone allograft. In the UCLA scale there was a decrease of 10.66 points, and an increase of 27.3 points in the Quick-DASH, at the end of the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In our series of cases we found similarities in the literature, in relation to demographic aspects and obtaining good radiographic results, which do not correspond to the functional outcome of patients

El Test de Constant-Murley como método de valoración clínica para el seguimiento de las fracturas de extremidad proximal del húmero Revisión y controversias / The Constant-Murley Test as a clinical assessment method for monitoring proximal humerus fractures: Review and controversies

Aplicamos el test para el seguimiento clínico y funcional de tres líneas terapéuticas diferentes en pacientes con fractura de la extremidad proximal del húmero. Resultados: La falta de estandarización en cuanto a la medición de los parámetros que conforman el test genera dificultad en la ejecución e interpretación de los resultados. La cuantificación de las rotaciones interna y externa mediante gestos funcionales no permite cuantificar de forma precisa el rango articular, y el parámetro fuerza tiene gran variabilidad de medición e interpretación según los evaluadores, sin criterios definidos. DISCUSIÓN: Esta revisión respalda el uso del test de Constant para seguimiento clínico de la patología del hombro y protocolos de investigación específicos, pero subraya la necesidad de una mayor estandarización para realizar el procedimiento de medición de rangos articulares y fuerza y la precaución al interpretar las puntuaciones. CONCLUSIONES: El test de Constant-Murley es de fácil aplicabilidad clínica y ofrece ventajas en el seguimiento de diversas patologías del hombro, pero su falta de estandarización en cuanto a la medición de los ítems que lo conforman lo hace poco reproducible, en especial respecto al parámetro fuerza. Existe un vacío de evidencia respecto a las propiedades psicométricas más importantes del test, como la validez del contenido, el cambio mínimo detectable y la diferencia mínima clínicamente importante. Sería necesario la conformación de tablas normalizadas ajustadas a edad y sexo de cada población, para que los resultados de la realización del test fueran óptimos. Así como mejorar la concordancia intra e interobservador para mejorar la comparación de los resultados, tanto del mismo paciente, como del paciente con la población a la que pertenece

The Constant scale, also known as the Constant- Murley test, is one of the most widely used tools to evaluate the functional capacity of the shoulder, which has been shown to be specifically useful for evaluating clinical results in shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff reparations, adhesive capsulitis and proximal humerus fractures. Previous clinical trials have shown the different use of this test depending on the population groups (age and sex), the type of the rotator cuff pathology, and the poor results of the reliability and the test reproduction. The aim of this article is to show our experience with the test application in 36 patients with proximal humerus fractures, and the review of the present literature about the use of the scale based on the psycomethric evidence, on the validity, and on the try to decrease the bias relating to the population groups, the previous shoulder pathology and the differences asses in the observer variation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have reviewed the actual literature and included 30 published articles between 1969 and 2018. We have applied the test for the clinical and functional follow-up of 3 different treatments in patients with proximal humerus fracture. RESULTS: The lack of the standardization of the parameters measurement makes it difficult to execute and interpret the results. The quantification of the internal and external rotation through functional movement, doesn’t allow to specify the articular range, and the strength has wide measurement and interpretation variability depending on the explorers, withouth specific judgments. Discussion: This review supports the use of the Constant test for the clinical follow up of the shoulder pathology, and the specific investigation protocols, but shows the necessity of better standardization for the joint ranges measurement and strength; making important the precaution in the score interpretation. CONCLUSION: The Constant-Murley test is easy to apply and offers advantages in the follow-up of different shoulder pathologies, but the lack of the standardization in the items measurement makes that difficult to reproduce, specially at the strength. There is no evidence about the most important psychometric properties, such as validity, the detectable minimal change, and the minimal clinical difference. It would be necessary to constitute tables adjusted to the age and sex of each population, for the results would be optimal; and improve the agreement between observers for the better comparison of the results, as the same patient as the population which it belongs to

Association of Patient-reported Outcomes With Clinical Outcomes After Distal Humerus Fracture Treatment.

In this study, we assessed the patient-reported outcomes of distal humerus fracture treatment using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) or QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores and the association between patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 76 adult patients who sustained an acute distal humerus fracture between 2016 and 2018; 53 patients completed at least one patient-reported outcome measure used to assess physical function (PF) during their routine follow-up care (69.7% response rate). The average time to follow-up patient-reported outcome measure was 10.3 months. Patients completed the PROMIS PF 10a, PROMIS upper extremity (UE) 16a, and/or QuickDASH based on the treating institution/service. In addition, the PROMIS Global (Mental) subscale score was used as a measure of self-rated mental health. To assess clinical outcomes, we measured radiographic union, range of motion, and postoperative complications. Results: Most fractures were intra-articular (67.9%), and 84.9% were treated surgically. After treatment, 98.1% of fractures united radiographically. By the final follow-up, the average arc of motion was 18° to 122°. Average (±SD) PROMIS PF and UE scores were 41.7 ± 11.1 and 40.8 ± 12.4, respectively. The average QuickDASH score was 39.4 ± 26.5. The arc of flexion-extension and PROMIS Global (Mental) score were independently associated with PROMIS PF and PROMIS UE scores. Conclusions: We found that clinical factors (the arc of flexion-extension) and patient psychological factors (PROMIS Global [Mental] score) were independently associated with PROMIS measures of PF after distal humerus fracture treatment. These data can be used to contextualize patient outcomes and guide patient expectations.

Correlation between modified trochleocapitellar index and post-traumatic elbow stiffness in type C2-3 distal humeral fractures among adults.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to propose the modified trochleocapitellar index (mTCI), assess its reliability, and evaluate its correlation with post-traumatic elbow stiffness in type C2-3 distal humeral fractures among adults. METHODS: From January 2013 to June 2017, a total of 141 patients with type C2-3 distal humeral fractures were included. The mTCI was calculated as the ratio between the modified trochlear and capitellar angles relative to the humeral axis (mTCI-HA), lateral humeral line (mTCI-LHL), and medial humeral line (mTCI-MHL) from anteroposterior radiographs taken immediately after the operation. The patients were divided into group A (with elbow stiffness) and group B (without elbow stiffness) based on follow-up results. To determine risk factors for elbow stiffness, univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed on each radiographic parameter separately, together with other clinical variables. Interrater reliability was assessed for all measurements. RESULTS: Specific optimal ranges of value were identified for mTCI-HA (0.750-0.875), mTCI-LHL (0.640-1.060), and mTCI-MHL (0.740-0.900), beyond which the likelihood of elbow stiffness significantly increased (P < .001). By multivariate analysis, mTCI-HA (odds ratio [OR] 26.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.39-203.07, P = .002), mTCI-LHL (OR 5.37, 95% CI 2.17-13.28, P < .001), and mTCI-MHL (OR 5.95, 95% CI 1.91-18.56, P = .002) values beyond the optimal ranges were identified as the independent risk factors for elbow stiffness. The interrater reliability of mTCI-HA, mTCI-LHL, and mTCI-MHL was 0.986, 0.983, and 0.987, respectively. CONCLUSION: The mTCI measurement method is reliable. Either too small or too large mTCI values were associated with post-traumatic elbow stiffness among adult patients with type C2-3 distal humeral fractures. The mTCI-HA showed a better predictive value than mTCI-LHL and mTCI-MHL.

Validity of the distance between the anterior humeral line and capitellum as a quantitative measure of supracondylar humeral fracture in children.

INTRODUCTION: The anterior humeral line (AHL) is a radiographic marker used to quantify anterior-posterior displacement in supracondylar humeral fractures on lateral radiographs. As both the anterior border of the capitellum and the undeveloped ossific nucleus are clearly recognisable on lateral radiographs, we analysed the distance between the AHL and capitellum (AC distance). We hypothesised that the AC distance would provide a highly reproducible and useful index of correction losses in supracondylar humeral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients (mean age: 6.5 years) who had suffered supracondylar humeral fractures were enrolled in this study. The fractures were corrected by cross pinning in 28 patients and by lateral or lateral and posterior pinning in 14 patients. The AC distance, Baumann angle, and tilting angle were measured in radiographs of the supracondylar humeral fractures obtained immediately after surgery and after bone union. Correction losses were calculated and defined as changes in the AC distance, tilting angle, and Baumann angle. We investigated inter-observer and intra-observer variability in all three radiological parameters and also compared these parameters between children who underwent lateral pin fixation and those who underwent crossed pin fixation. RESULTS: An analysis of intra-observer variability yielded values of 0.93, 0.73, and 0.92 for the AC distance, tilting angle, and Baumann angle, respectively. An analysis of inter-observer variability yielded corresponding values of 0.84, 0.46, and 0.79, respectively. Notably, the change in AC distance was significantly smaller in the cross pinning group than in the lateral pinning group. DISCUSSION: Compared with the Baumann angle and tilting angle, the AC distance was identified as the most reliable method for measuring radiographs. Moreover, smaller correction losses were observed with cross pinning than with lateral pinning. Therefore, the AC distance is a useful and accurate quantitative parameter when analysing supracondylar fractures in children using sagittal plane images.

Conservative vs. operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to compare conservative vs. operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures in terms of the nonunion rate, reintervention rate, permanent radial nerve palsy rate, and functional outcomes. Secondarily, effect estimates from observational studies were compared with estimates of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS: The PubMed/Medline, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases were searched for both RCTs and observational studies comparing conservative with operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures. RESULTS: A total of 2 RCTs (150 patients) and 10 observational studies (1262 patients) were included. The pooled nonunion rate of all studies was higher in patients treated conservatively (15.3%) vs. operatively (6.4%) (risk difference, 8%; odds ratio [OR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-4.5; I2 = 0%). The reintervention rate was also higher for conservative treatment (14.3%) than for operative treatment (8.9%) (risk difference, 6%; OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5; I2 = 30%). The higher reintervention rate was predominantly attributable to the higher nonunion rate in patients treated conservatively. The permanent radial nerve palsy rate was equal in both groups (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.9; I2 = 18%). There appeared to be no difference in mean time to union and mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores between the treatment groups. No difference was found between effect estimates form observational studies and RCTs. CONCLUSION: This systematic review shows that satisfactory results can be achieved with both conservative and operative management; however, operative treatment reduces the risk of nonunion compared with conservative treatment, with comparable reintervention rates (for indications other than nonunion). Furthermore, operative treatment results in a similar permanent radial nerve palsy rate, despite its inherent additional surgery-related risks. No difference in mean time-to-union and short-term functional results was detected.

Humeral Shaft Fracture Healing Rates in Older Patients.

Nonoperative treatment has become the standard of care for the majority of humeral shaft fractures. Published studies have mainly come from trauma centers with a young cohort of patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the nonunion rate of humeral shaft fractures in patients older than 55 years. A retrospective study was performed on a group of orthopedic trauma group treated at a level I trauma center during a 10-year period (2007-2017). Patients 55 years or older and treated for a humeral shaft fracture nonoperatively, with or without manipulation, were identified. Nonunion was defined by no bridging callus radiographically or by gross motion at the fracture at least 12 weeks from injury. There were 31 patients identified with humeral shaft fractures who met the inclusion criteria. The cohort included 21 (67.7%) females and 10 (32.3%) males with a mean age of 72.5 years (range, 55-92 years). Twenty-one fractures went on to union, and there were 10 nonunions, with no significant differences in the demographics or comorbidities. There was no correlation between AO/OTA fracture classification or fracture location and union status. There was a tendency toward higher risk of nonunion in proximal third humeral shaft fractures (45%) compared with middle (26%) and distal third (20%) humeral shaft fractures, although this was not statistically significant. The overall nonunion rate for humeral shaft fractures was 32% for patients older than 55 years. The authors found a significant correlation between age and union rate: as age increased, union rate decreased (R=-0.9, P=.045). The incidence of humeral shaft nonunion in patients older than 55 years was significantly higher than that of younger adults. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to report a significant correlation between nonunion and increased age. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(3);168-172.].