United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) consensus on gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is a condition characterized by epigastric symptoms and delayed gastric emptying (GE) rate in the absence of any mechanical obstruction. The condition is challenging in clinical practice by the lack of guidance concerning diagnosis and management of gastroparesis. METHODS: A Delphi consensus was undertaken by 40 experts from 19 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 89 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation criteria. Consensus (defined as ≥80% agreement) was reached for 25 statements. RESULTS: The European consensus defined gastroparesis as the presence of symptoms associated with delayed GE in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Nausea and vomiting were identified as cardinal symptoms, with often coexisting postprandial distress syndrome symptoms of dyspepsia. The true epidemiology of gastroparesis is not known in detail, but diabetes, gastric surgery, certain neurological and connective tissue diseases, and the use of certain drugs recognized as risk factors. While the panel agreed that severely impaired gastric motor function is present in these patients, there was no consensus on underlying pathophysiology. The panel agreed that an upper endoscopy and a GE test are required for diagnosis. Only dietary therapy, dopamine-2 antagonists and 5-HT4 receptor agonists were considered appropriate therapies, in addition to nutritional support in case of severe weight loss. No consensus was reached on the use of proton pump inhibitors, other classes of antiemetics or prokinetics, neuromodulators, complimentary, psychological, or more invasive therapies. Finally, there was consensus that gastroparesis adversely impacts on quality of life and healthcare costs and that the long-term prognosis of gastroparesis depends on the cause. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: A multinational group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on definition, symptom characteristics, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of gastroparesis.

Nutritional approaches for gastroparesis.

Patients with gastroparesis often have signs and symptoms including nausea, vomiting, epigastric discomfort, and early satiety, thus leading to inadequate food intake and a high risk of malnutrition. There is a considerable scarcity of data about nutritional strategies for gastroparesis, and current practices rely on extrapolated evidence. Some approaches include the modification of food composition, food consistency, and food volume in the context of delayed gastric emptying. If the patient is unable to consume adequate calories through a solid food diet, stepwise nutritional interventions could include the use of liquid meals, oral nutrition supplements, enteral nutrition, and parenteral nutrition. This Review discusses the role, rationale, and current evidence of diverse nutritional interventions in the management of gastroparesis.

Hydration Strategy for Endurance Running in an Athlete Requiring Home Parenteral Nutrition.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to share our experience with optimizing home parenteral nutrition (HPN) and hydration therapy for an HPN consumer who desired to run a marathon. METHODS: A 34-year-old woman with idiopathic gastroparesis necessitating HPN and intravenous (IV) hydration desired to train for a marathon. For short runs, prerun and/or postrun hydration were adequate, but a marathon (26.2 miles) would be too long to run without IV hydration. During training, we instructed our consumer to record weights (pre/post run), ambient temperature, running distance, and duration of time. These data were used to calculate her sweat rate and estimate hydration volume during the marathon. RESULTS: Ambient temperature was a significant factor influencing sweat rate. The estimate temperature for the marathon was 65 °F; therefore, our consumer would have an estimated sweat rate of approximately 720 mL/h. This exceeded the amount of fluid that could be infused during the marathon; therefore, we advised our consumer to overhydrate prior to the race. Initial postrace urine output was low and concentrated but returned to baseline after postrace hydration. Our consumer did not experience any symptoms of dehydration and had only minor muscle soreness. CONCLUSIONS: Our consumer was able to complete a marathon with IV hydration. We have shown that with careful preparation, calculation, and planning, our HPN consumer was able to adequately maintain her state of hydration and accomplish her goal of running a marathon.

Foods provoking and alleviating symptoms in gastroparesis: patient experiences.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional counseling for gastroparesis focuses on reduction of meal size, fiber, and fat to control symptoms. The tolerance of gastroparesis patients for particular foods is largely anecdotal. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize foods provoking or alleviating gastroparesis symptoms. METHODS: Gastroparesis patients completed: (1) Demographic Questionnaire; (2) Patient Assessment of Upper GI Symptoms; (3) Food Toleration and Aversion survey asking patients about experiences when eating certain foods utilizing a scale from -3 (greatly worsening symptoms) to +3 (greatly improving symptoms). Descriptive qualities (acidic, fatty, spicy, roughage-based, bitter, salty, bland, and sweet) were assigned to foods. RESULTS: Forty-five gastroparesis patients participated (39 idiopathic gastroparesis). Foods worsening symptoms included: orange juice, fried chicken, cabbage, oranges, sausage, pizza, peppers, onions, tomato juice, lettuce, coffee, salsa, broccoli, bacon, and roast beef. Saltine crackers, jello, and graham crackers moderately improved symptoms. Twelve additional foods were tolerated by patients (not provoking symptoms): ginger ale, gluten-free foods, tea, sweet potatoes, pretzels, white fish, clear soup, salmon, potatoes, white rice, popsicles, and applesauce. Foods provoking symptoms were generally fatty, acidic, spicy, and roughage-based. The foods shown to be tolerable were generally bland, sweet, salty, and starchy. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified specific foods that worsen as well as foods that may help alleviate symptoms of gastroparesis. Foods that provoked symptoms differed in quality from foods that alleviated symptoms or were tolerable. The results of this study illustrate specific examples of foods that aggravate or improve symptoms and provide suggestions for a gastroparesis diet.

Nutritional considerations in the patient with gastroparesis.

Gastroparesis, or delayed gastric emptying, has many origins and can wax and wane depending on the underlying cause. Not only do the symptoms significantly alter quality of life, but the clinical consequences can also be life threatening. Once a patient develops protracted nausea and vomiting, providing adequate nutrition, hydration, and access to therapeutics such as prokinetics and antiemetics can present an exceptional challenge to clinicians. This article reviews the limited evidence available for oral nutrition, as well as enteral and parenteral nutritional support therapies. Practical strategies are provided to improve the nutritional depletion that often accompanies this debilitating condition.

Effect of dietary fat and food consistency on gastroparesis symptoms in patients with gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Nutrition therapy for gastroparesis focuses on reducing meal size, fiber, fat intake, and increasing liquids intake relative to solid foods. Evidence to support these dietary interventions has been anecdotal. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of fat intake and solid/liquid meal consistency on symptoms in gastroparesis. METHODS: Twelve patients with gastroparesis were studied on four separate days receiving one of four meals each day in a randomized order: high-fat solid, high-fat liquid, low-fat liquid, and low-fat solid meal. At each visit, eight gastrointestinal symptoms were rated from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) every 15 min, before and for 4 h after meal ingestion. KEY RESULTS: There was an increase in the total symptom score in the following order: high-fat solid > low-fat solid > high-fat liquid > low-fat liquid. For the high-fat solid meal, symptoms remained elevated throughout the 4 h postprandial period. Severity of nausea more than doubled after the high-fat solid meal, whereas the low-fat liquid meal caused the least increase in nausea. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: A high-fat solid meal significantly increased overall symptoms among individuals with gastroparesis, whereas a low-fat liquid meal had the least effect. With respect to nausea, low-fat meals were better tolerated than high-fat meals, and liquid meals were better tolerated than solid meals. These data provide support for recommendations that low-fat and increased liquid content meals are best tolerated in patients with symptomatic gastroparesis.

A small particle size diet reduces upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with diabetic gastroparesis: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Gastroparesis is a well-known complication to diabetes mellitus (DM). Dietary advice is considered to be of importance to reduce gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in patients with diabetic gastroparesis, but no randomized controlled trials exist. Our aim was to compare GI symptoms in insulin treated DM subjects with gastroparesis eating a diet with small particle size ("intervention diet") with the recommended diet for DM ("control diet"). METHODS: 56 subjects with insulin treated DM and gastroparesis were randomized to the intervention diet or the control diet. The patients received dietary advice by a dietitian at 7 occasions during 20 weeks. GI symptom severity, nutrient intake and glycemic control were measured before and after the intervention. RESULTS: A significantly greater reduction of the severity of the key gastroparetic symptoms-nausea/vomiting (P=0.01), postprandial fullness (P=0.02) and bloating (P=0.006)-were seen in patients who received the intervention diet compared with the control diet, and this was also true for regurgitation/heartburn (P=0.02), but not for abdominal pain. Anxiety was reduced after the intervention diet, but not after the control diet, whereas no effect on depression or quality of life was noted in any of the groups. A higher fat intake in the intervention group was noted, but otherwise no differences in body weight, HbA1c or nutrient intake were seen. CONCLUSIONS: A small particle diet improves the key symptoms of gastroparesis in patients with diabetes mellitus. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01557296).

Novel soy germ pasta enriched in isoflavones ameliorates gastroparesis in type 2 diabetes: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of soy germ pasta enriched in biologically active isoflavone aglycons on gastric emptying in type 2 diabetic patients with gastroparesis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared soy germ pasta with conventional pasta for effects on gastric emptying. Patients (n = 10) with delayed gastric emptying consumed one serving per day of each pasta for 8 weeks, with a 4-week washout. Gastric emptying time (t1/2) was measured using the [(13)C]octanoic acid breath test at baseline and after each period, and blood glucose and insulin concentrations were determined after oral glucose load. RESULTS: Soy germ pasta significantly accelerated the t1/2 in these patients (161.2 ± 17.5 min at baseline vs. 112.6 ± 11.2 min after treatment, P = 0.009). Such change differed significantly (P = 0.009) from that for conventional pasta (153.6 ± 24.2 vs. 156.2 ± 27.4 min), without affecting glucose or insulin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that soy germ pasta may offer a simple dietary approach to managing diabetic gastropathy.

Nutrición en la esclerosis sistémica / Nutrition in systemic sclerosis

La esclerosis sistémica es una enfermedad del tejido conectivo caracterizada por inflamación y fibrosis de múltiples órganos (piel, aparato digestivo, pulmón, riñón y corazón). Después de la piel, el órgano más afectado, con una frecuencia del 75 al 90%, es el tracto gastrointestinal. La afectación del tracto gastrointestinal se manifiesta por la aparición de disfagia orofaríngea, disfagia esofágica, reflujo gastroesofágico, gastroparesia, seudoobstrucción, sobrecrecimiento bacteriano y malabsorción intestinal, estreñimiento, diarrea y/o incontinencia fecal. Estas afectaciones condicionan la ingesta alimentaria y la absorción intestinal y conducen a la aparición progresiva de deficiencias nutricionales. Alrededor de un 30% de los pacientes con esclerosis sistémica presentan un riesgo de malnutrición. En el 5-10%, los trastornos gastrointestinales son la principal causa de muerte. Las estrategias terapéuticas existentes en la actualidad son limitadas y están dirigidas a reducir la sintomatología clínica. El manejo multidisciplinar de dichos pacientes, que incluya la intervención nutricional, contribuye a mejorar la sintomatología gastrointestinal, además de evitar la malnutrición, la morbilidad y aumentar la calidad de vida (AU)

Systemic sclerosis is a connective tissue disease characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of multiple organs (skin, gastrointestinal tract, lung, kidney and heart). After the skin, the organ most affected with a frequency of 75 to 90%, the gastrointestinal tract is more often involved. Gastrointestinal tract involvement is manifested by the appearance of oropharyngeal dysphagia, esophageal dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux, gastroparesis, pseudo-obstruction, bacterial overgrowth and intestinal malabsorption, constipation, diarrhea and/or fecal incontinence. These effects influence food intake and intestinal absorption leading to the gradual emergence of nutritional deficiencies. About 30% of patients with systemic sclerosis are at risk of malnutrition. In 5-10%, gastrointestinal disorders are the leading cause of death. Therapeutic strategies currently available are limited and aimed at reducing clinical symptoms. The multidisciplinary management of these patients, including nutritional intervention, helps improve gastrointestinal symptoms, and avoid malnutrition, morbidity and improve quality of life (AU)

Dietary intake and nutritional deficiencies in patients with diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastroparesis can lead to food aversion, poor oral intake, and subsequent malnutrition. We characterized dietary intake and nutritional deficiencies in patients with diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. METHODS: Patients with gastroparesis on oral intake (N = 305) were enrolled in the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Gastroparesis Registry and completed diet questionnaires at 7 centers. Medical history, gastroparesis symptoms, answers to the Block Food Frequency Questionnaire, and gastric emptying scintigraphy results were analyzed. RESULTS: Caloric intake averaged 1168 ± 801 kcal/day, amounting to 58% ± 39% of daily total energy requirements (TER). A total of 194 patients (64%) reported caloric-deficient diets, defined as <60% of estimated TER. Only 5 patients (2%) followed a diet suggested for patients with gastroparesis. Deficiencies were present in several vitamins and minerals; patients with idiopathic disorders were more likely to have diets with estimated deficiencies in vitamins A, B(6), C, K, iron, potassium, and zinc than diabetic patients. Only one-third of patients were taking multivitamin supplements. More severe symptoms (bloating and constipation) were characteristic of patients who reported an energy-deficient diet. Overall, 32% of patients had nutritional consultation after the onset of gastroparesis; consultation was more likely among patients with longer duration of symptoms and more hospitalizations and patients with diabetes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that nutritional consultation increased the chances that daily TER were met (odds ratio, 1.51; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with gastroparesis have diets deficient in calories, vitamins, and minerals. Nutritional consultation is obtained infrequently but is suggested for dietary therapy and to address nutritional deficiencies.

Treatment of refractory gastroparesis: gastric and jejunal tubes, botox, gastric electrical stimulation, and surgery.

Refractory gastroparesis is a challenging disorder for gastroenterologists, internists, surgeons, and all health care professionals involved in the care of these patients. It should be managed by a stepwise algorithm beginning with dietary modifications, then prokinetic and antiemetic medications, measures to control pain and address psychological issues, and endoscopic or surgical options in selected patients, including placement of feeding jejunostomy tubes.

Nutrition concerns for the patient with gastroparesis.

Gastroparesis is a debilitating disease that is the consequence of a variety of conditions resulting in a significant loss of quality of life. Although many cases are mild, some patients have protracted nausea and vomiting, making it difficult, if not impossible, to maintain their hydration and nutritional status. Furthermore, therapeutic levels of medications, such as prokinetic and antiemetic agents, can be difficult to achieve. The intent of this article is to provide the clinician with suggestions to improve the nutritional status of patients with gastroparesis and offer strategies to deal with the nutritional insults that arise in these unfortunate patients.

Insulinización en el paciente diabético en tratamiento con nutrición enteral y parenteral / Insulin therapy in the diabetic patient receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition

La nutrición enteral o parenteral en pacientes con diabetes es frecuente en la práctica clínica. La valoración nutricional, las indicaciones del soporte nutricional y el cálculo de los requerimientos calóricos son similares a los de los pacientes no diabéticos, a excepción de las situaciones clínicas de gastroparesia diabética y de sobrepeso. Se debe evitar la sobrealimentación, por lo que el peso usado para calcular los requerimientos calóricos debería ser uno intermedio entre el ideal y el real. Las fórmulas de nutrición enteral con menor contenido en hidratos de carbono y más ricas en grasas se asocian con un mejor control glucémico que las fórmulas estándares usadas. No hay evidencias científi cas para la nutrición enteral continua en pacientes hospitalizados. Cuando se inicia nutrición enteral por sonda, se recomienda el uso de insulinas de acción rápida hasta que la perfusión llega a 40 mL/h, a partir de la cual el empleo de insulina NPH o análogos de insulina de acción prolongada (glargina o detemir) suele ser seguro. Se pueden usar hipoglucemiantes orales en pacientes diabéticos tipo 2 bien controlados y estables. Antes de la administración de nutrición parenteral, debería realizarse un control de glucemia y añadir una cantidad basal de insulina rápida a la solución de nutrición parenteral en los casos de glucemia >150 mg/dL o en pacientes en tratamiento previo con insulina o hipoglucemiantes orales. Se suele iniciar con 0,1 UI/g de glucosa administradas en la solución y suplementos de insulina rápida subcutánea ante situaciones de hiperglucemia, pero cuando ésta es importante, se requiere la instauración de perfusión de insulina intravenosa (i.v.)

In clinical practice, enteral or parenteral nutrition is frequently administered to diabetic patients. Nutritional assessment, indications for nutritional support and the estimation of nutritional needs are similar to those of nondiabetic patients, except that diabetic gastroparesis and excess weight are specific clinical conditions associated with diabetes. To avoid overfeeding, the weight used to estimate caloric requirements should be intermediate between the ideal and the current weight. Enteral formulas with less carbohydrate and more fat content are associated with better glycemic control than standard formulas. There is no evidence to support continuous enteral feeding in hospitalized patients. When initiating tube feeding, the administration of short-acting insulin is recommended, but once the infusion rate has reached 40 mL/h, the use of NPH or long-acting insulin analogues (insulin glargine or detemir) is generally safe. Oral hypoglycemic agents can be used in well-controlled type 2 diabetic patients. Before initiation of parenteral nutrition, capillary blood glucose should be measured. If glucose values are higher than 150 mg/dL or the patient had previously been treated with insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents, the addition of short-acting insulin to the parenteral nutrition solution is recommended. A common starting dose is 0.1 IU/g of dextrose in the solution and subcutaneous short-acting insulin supplements for elevated glucose values. When hyperglycemia is marked and persistent, intravenous insulin infusion is required

Clinical application of clip-assisted endoscopic method for nasoenteric feeding in patients with gastroparesis and gastroesophageal wounds.

AIM: To report the clinical experiences in the application of clip-assisted endoscopic method for nasoenteric feeding in patients with gastroparesis and patients with gastroesophageal wounds, and to compare the efficacy of nasoenteric feeding in these two indications. METHODS: From April 2002 to January 2004, 21 consecutive patients with gastroparesis or gastroesophageal wounds were enrolled and received nasoenteric feeding for nutritional support. A clip-assisted method was used to place the nasoenteric tubes. Outcomes in the two groups were compared with respect to the successful rate of enteral feeding, percentage of recommended energy intake (REI), and complication rates. RESULTS: The gastroparesis group included 13 patients with major burns (n = 7), trauma (n = 2), congestive heart failure (n = 2) and post-surgery gastric stasis syndrome (n = 2). The esophageogastric wound group included eight patients with tracheoesophageal fistula (n = 2) and wound leakage following gastric surgery (n = 6). Two study groups were similar in feeding successful rates (84.6% vs 75.0%). There were also no differences in the percentage of REI between groups (79.4% vs 78.6%). Additionally, no complications occurred in any of the study groups. CONCLUSION: Nasoenteric feeding is a useful method to provide nutritional support to most of the patients with gastroparesis who cannot tolerate nasogastric tube feeding and to the cases who need bypass feeding for esophageogastric wounds.

Current pharmacological treatment of gastroparesis.

The aetiology of gastroparesis differs between children and adults. During childhood, gastroparesis is quite rare, and is mostly seen in preterm infants, with either immaturity of the gastrointestinal tract, or when allergic to cow's milk protein. Acute, delayed gastric emptying may be observed following viral infections. In adults, most patients with gastroparesis are either idiopathic or of diabetic origin. As a consequence, approaches in the treatment of children and adults differ. Metoclopramide, domperidone, cisapride and erythromycin have all been studied. Evidence for benefit is strongest for the latter two drugs, although most studies have methodological shortcomings. From a paediatric perspective, it seems astonishing that more trials with erythromycin analogues have not been performed, as the few data available suggests that these analogues are more powerful, without the side effects of long-term, low-dose administration of antibiotics. Gastric electrical stimulation seems the most promising therapeutic option available at present.

Nutrition therapy for diabetic gastroparesis.

The management of diabetic gastroparesis often represents a significant clinical challenge in which the maintenance of nutrition is pivotal. Gastric emptying is delayed in 30% to 50% of patients with longstanding type 1 or type 2 diabetes and upper gastrointestinal symptoms also occur frequently. However, there is only a weak association between the presence of symptoms and delayed gastric emptying. Acute changes in blood glucose concentrations affect gastric motility in diabetes; hyperglycemia slows gastric emptying whereas hypoglycemia may accelerate it; blood glucose concentrations may also influence symptoms. It is now recognized that gastric emptying is a major determinant of postprandial glycemia and, therefore, there is considerable interest in the concept of modulating gastric emptying, by dietary or pharmacologic means, to optimize glycemic control in diabetes.