Gentamicin plasma concentrations in hospitalized horses and retrospective minimal inhibitory concentrations of gram-negative equine pathogens.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal dosage regimen of gentamicin in horses is still under investigation. The objectives of this study were to determine gentamicin plasma concentrations in hospitalized horses treated with 10 mg/kg gentamicin (IV, q 24 h) and to determine whether a plasma concentration to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of 10:1 is reached for equine pathogens using this dose. DESIGN: Prospective clinical observational study; retrospective study on MICs of 131 gram-negative bacteria isolated from horses (2012-2015). SETTING: University teaching hospital. ANIMALS: Ninety-eight horses >6 months old, treated with gentamicin for their primary disease, consecutive samples. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma concentrations were measured 1 hour (C1h ) and 20 hours (C20h ) after gentamicin administration using fluorescence polarization. Presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and azotemia was recorded, as well as the reason for antimicrobial administration (primary disease) and whether administration was prophylactic or therapeutic. The target C1h of ≥20 µg/mL gentamicin was reached in 90% of horses and was sufficient to reach a plasma concentration:MIC of 10:1 in 32 of 131 (24%) of gram-negative aerobic bacteria. A C20h ≤ 2 µg/mL was reached in 97% horses. Therapeutic versus prophylactic administration, primary disease, azotemia, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome were not associated with a failure to reach a desired peak or trough. CONCLUSIONS: The gentamicin dose of 10 mg/kg every 24 hours should be further investigated and safety assessed because a target gentamicin plasma concentration of ≥20 µg/mL was achieved in the majority of cases. Nephrotoxic side effects were not assessed. Individual drug monitoring should be performed because clinical factors are unreliable predictors of plasma concentrations. A gentamicin target concentration of ≥40 µg/mL does not offer additional benefits compared to ≥20 µg/mL, due to the bimodal distribution of resistance in bacterial isolates.

Toxicity Profile and Pharmacokinetic Study of Antibiotic Mixtures, Gentamicin and Vancomycin, in Rat Plasma by Ecofriendly Liquid Chromatography Coupled Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

The global burden of bacterial infection and antimicrobial resistance increases the demand to associate more than one antibiotic to fight life-threatening bacteria. Therefore, there is a great necessity to develop simple and sensitive methods for routine analysis of clinical samples. Therapeutic drug monitoring, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetic studies are essential to ensure drug efficiency and safety. Herein, therefore, the first ecofriendly liquid chromatography -tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and fully validated for simultaneous determination of a commonly combined antibiotic for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin (VCM) and gentamicin (GTM), in rat plasma after parenteral administration. VCM and GTM were extracted from plasma sample using acetonitrile (ACN)/0.1% TFA-induced protein precipitation followed by the separation on an Agilent Eclipse Plus ODS (3 mm × 100 mm, 3.5 µm) column using water-enriched mobile phase consisting of water containing 0.1% THF/ACN (85:15, v/v%) at flow rates of 0.30 mL min-1. The mass spectrometry parameters were optimized, and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in positive ion mode of two transitions was utilized for quantification of precursor to product ion at m/z 725.5 → 144 and 100.1 for VCM as [M + 2H]2+, 478.3 → 322.2 and 156.9 for GTM, and 586.3 → 162.9 and 425.3 for amikacin (AMK) internal standard, as [M + H]+. The current method has been validated as per U.S. FDA bioanalytical guidelines in terms of linearity, accuracy, precision, selectivity, recovery, matrix effects, and stability. The method was linear in the range of 1-2000 ng mL-1 and 1-1000 ng mL-1 with detection limits (S/N of 3) of 0.18 and 0.09 ng mL-1 for VCM and GTM, respectively. The selectivity and high sensitivity allow the current method to succeed in the study of pharmacokinetic parameters and drug-drug interaction between VCM and GTM after single-dose administration. VCM increased plasma clearance and elimination rate constant of GTM when coadministered and GTM also too. The change of serum chemistry analysis and significant elevation of creatinine and BUN indicate an alteration in kidney function in group III in those given the combined antibiotics. Our finding illustrated the nephrotoxicity of the two drugs when associated. The ecofriendly, simplicity, and rapidity of the current study made it a promising method for high-throughput biomonitoring in clinical samples.

Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in haemodialysis patients: modelling, simulations and recommendations.

PURPOSE: The usual recommended dose for gentamicin is 3 to 7 mg/kg/day for patients with a normal renal function while 1.7 mg/kg/day is recommended for patients undergoing chronic haemodialysis. The objectives of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetics model (POPPK) for gentamicin, designed for patients undergoing dialysis, and to investigate the best dosing scheme for different MIC clinical breakpoints using Monte Carlo simulations. METHODS: In this monocentric prospective interventional open clinical study, 23 patients (141 gentamicin samples) were included. The covariates investigated were weight, creatinine, dialysis (yes/no), dialysis flow and dialysis duration. The POPPK model was developed in Pmetrics and 1000 time-concentration profiles were simulated for 9 doses between 2 and 10 mg/kg/day, with an inter-dose period of 24, 48 or 96 h to predict the probability of having both a serum peak > 8*MIC and a trough < 1 mg/L for MIC values between 0.25 and 4 mg/L. RESULTS: A two-compartment model including the dialysis on the elimination constant and bodyweight on the volume of distribution best described the data. A 30-min gentamicin infusion of 2 mg/kg/day (for MIC = 1 mg/L) or 8 mg/kg/day (for MIC = 4 mg/L) just before dialysis eliminated by two dialysis sessions before the next administration (dose interval of at least 96 h) led to a peak > 8*MIC for > 90% of the simulations and a trough concentration < 1 mg/L at 96 h for 92% and 34% respectively. CONCLUSION: The gentamicin dose generally used to treat infections in dialysis patients is insufficient and might be increased to 3-8 mg/kg/day just before dialysis, taking into account the type of infection.

Analytical validation of a quantitative method for therapeutic drug monitoring on the Alinity®c Abbott.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the Alinity®c Abbott compared to the Architect® immunoassay system for the determination of drugs having a narrow therapeutic index. METHODS: Valproic acid, amikacin, gentamicin, phenobarbital and vancomycin were analyzed using Particle-Enhanced Turbidimetric Inhibitor Immunoassay (Petinia), phenytoin and theophylline were analyzed using an immunoenzymatic method and a colorimetric method was performed to quantify lithium. The methods were validated according to the total error approach. Seven validation standards were analyzed in quintuplet during four days to establish the limits of the methods. Dilution integrity and interferences (hemolysis and high concentrations of bilirubin and lipids) were also tested. Depending on the analyte, the results obtained for twenty to forty patients on the Alinity® were compared to those obtained on the Architect®. RESULTS: The bias and the coefficients of variation for repeatability and for intermediate precision were lower than 15% for all drugs. Accuracy profiles were acceptable (acceptance limits fixed at 30%) in the validated ranges. The lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) were similar to those determined by Abbott except for gentamicin for which we determined a LLOQ at 1.22 mg/L while Abbott determined it at 0.5 mg/L. All assays diluted linear and analyte concentrations were not affected by interferences. Concentrations obtained for real samples on the Alinity®c are comparable to those obtained on the Architect®ci. CONCLUSIONS: The analytical validation of a method suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of drugs on the Alinity®c meets the requirements of European Medicines Agency.

Evaluation of Assays to Measure Aminoglycosides in Serum: Comparison of Accuracy and Precision Based on External Quality Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Aminoglycosides require highly accurate therapeutic drug monitoring owing to their narrow therapeutic windows and toxic side effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring varies in different laboratories, and this difference is mainly due to the use of different analytical techniques. This study aimed to compare the accuracy and precision of immunoassays for the measurement of gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin in serum. METHODS: Human plasma samples were spiked with known concentrations of amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin and dispatched to laboratories worldwide. The percentage deviation and coefficient of variation were calculated to compare the accuracy and precision among immunoassays and among antibiotics. RESULTS: We analyzed 273, 534, and 207 amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin measurement results, obtained satisfactory rates of 83.9%, 86.3%, and 93.7%, and coefficients of variation ranging from 1.1% to 15.6%, 2.9% to 25.2%, and 1.8% to 27.0%, respectively. The percentage deviation ranged from -7.5% to 6.6%, -20.8% to 18.7%, and -33.2% to 41.5% for amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin, respectively. Significant differences were observed in accuracy and precision among assays for all antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated high variations in results obtained from antibiotic assays conducted at different laboratories worldwide.

Clinical audit of gentamicin use by Bayesian pharmacokinetic approach in critically ill children.

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill children tend to have altered gentamicin pharmacokinetics (PK); and so we carried out an audit of gentamicin use using the estimated peak concentrations (Cmax), trough concentrations (Cmin) and area-under-the-concentration-time curve (AUCs) by Bayesian approach. METHODS: Critically ill children with at least one serum gentamicin concentrations available were recruited. We used multiple models Bayesian adaptive control to estimate Cmax, and AUC0-t following each dose. Pediatric risk, injury, failure, loss, end stage renal disease (pRIFLE) criteria was used to identify the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). RESULTS: Seventy-three children (961 doses and 143 concentrations) were analysed. AUC0-24 was observed to be higher in earlier age groups with a steady decline in older children. Similar changes were observed in Cmax, Cmin and AUC0-24 at steady state. Significantly higher proportions of children in the other age groups were estimated to have Cmax between 5 and 10 mg/L compared to neonates. Neonates had a higher risk of Cmax above 10 mg/L. Patients with augmented renal clearance exhibited lower AUC0-24 and reduced proportion achieving the target AUC0-24 levels. Nearly one-third of children were observed to meet the pRIFLE criteria for AKI. CONCLUSION: We observed higher initial doses and peak concentrations of gentamicin in neonates and infants compared to older age groups in critically ill children. Uniformity in the paediatric-specific standard treatment guidelines for gentamicin is the need of the hour.

Hearing in Schoolchildren After Neonatal Exposure to a High-Dose Gentamicin Regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between gentamicin exposure in the neonatal period and hearing in school age. METHODS: This study included children exposed to a high-dose (6 mg/kg) gentamicin regimen as neonates (2004-2012), invited for follow-up at school age, and a healthy age-matched control group. We assessed hearing with pure tone audiometry including the extended high-frequency (EHF) range. Outcomes were average hearing thresholds in the midfrequencies (0.5-4 kHz) and the EHFs (9-16 kHz). The measures of gentamicin exposure were cumulative dose and highest trough plasma concentration. We used linear regression models to assess the impact of gentamicin exposure, and other peri- and postnatal morbidities, on hearing thresholds. RESULTS: A total of 219 gentamicin-exposed and 33 healthy-control children were included in the audiological analysis. In the gentamicin cohort, 39 (17%) had a birth weight <1500 g. Median cumulative doses and trough plasma concentrations were 30 (interquartile range 24-42) mg/kg and 1.0 (interquartile range 0.7-1.2) mg/L, respectively. Median hearing thresholds for the midfrequencies and the EHFs were 2.5 (0 to 6.3) dB hearing level and -1.7 (-5.0 to 5.0) dB hearing level, both of which were within the normal range. In an adjusted analysis, increasing hearing thresholds were associated with lower birth weight and postnatal middle-ear disease but not level of gentamicin exposure. After adjusting for birth weight, there was no difference in hearing threshold between the gentamicin-exposed cohort and healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to a high-dose gentamicin regimen in the neonatal period was not associated with an increase in hearing thresholds in schoolchildren being able to complete audiometry.

Green synthesis of hesperidin coated silver nanoparticles for colorimetric detection of gentamicin sulfate in real samples.

Gentamicin sulfate (GEN), a well-known broad-spectrum antibiotic is mostly administered through intramuscular injections and entirely excreted in un-metabolized form through urination from patient's body. Quantitative detection of GEN by direct UV absorption is usually challenging due to lack of chromophores and fluorophores in structure. The current study described the hesperidin coated silver nanoparticles (HSPAgNPs) based novel colorimetric quantitative assay for GEN. HSPAgNPs, based colorimetric detection involved a transition from characteristic yellow colour to blackish brown upon addition of GEN, accompanied by a significant quenching in localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) band at λmax 398 nm. Moreover, the synthesized HSPAgNPs were employed to rapid and quantitative detection of GEN in concentration range of 5 to 100 µM. Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) was calculated by standard deviation of the ordinate intercept and slope of the regression line and estimated to be 6.89 µM and 20.88 µM respectively, with a linear correlation factor R2 equal to 0.9990 which strictly followed Beer's law. Furthermore, the utility and effectiveness of HSPAgNPs was also explored for selective recognition of GEN in tap water, serum, human blood plasma and urine.

A Retrospective Review of the Efficiency of First-Dose Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Gentamicin, Amikacin, and Vancomycin in the Pediatric Population.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has become standard clinical practice for gentamicin, amikacin, and vancomycin to optimize efficacy and reduce toxicity. TDM after the first dose of antibiotic was adopted in our institution. This study aims to evaluate if target therapeutic drug concentrations could be achieved more rapidly in patients with TDM performed after the first dose of gentamicin, amikacin, or vancomycin compared to TDM at steady state. A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore. Patients aged 1 month to 18 years old who received amikacin, gentamicin, or vancomycin between October 2012 to March 2016 and had at least 2 serum drug concentrations done within the same dosing interval were included. The primary objective was to compare the time taken to achieve target serum drug concentrations between first-dose and steady-state TDM. A total of 334 patients on amikacin, 211 patients on gentamicin, and 140 patients on vancomycin were included. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median number of days to optimize therapy was significantly shorter after first-dose TDM was performed for amikacin (first dose, 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44-1.89] days vs steady state, 2.85 [95%CI, 2.50-3.25] days; P < .01] and gentamicin (first dose, 1.66 [95%CI, 1.25-2.08] days vs steady state, 3.54 [95%CI, 2.40-4.75] days; P < .01] but not vancomycin (first dose, 1.34 [95%CI, 1.06-1.52] days vs steady state, 1.42 [95%CI, 1.26-1.59] days; P = .99]. First-dose TDM for gentamicin and amikacin resulted in faster attainment of target serum concentrations but did not for vancomycin. Further validation of its impact on actual clinical outcomes may be required.

The evaluation of the appropriate gentamicin use for preterm infants.

Gentamicin (GM) is used for neonates as the initial treatment for neonatal bacterial infection. An association between high trough GM levels and the elevation of the serum creatinine (sCr) level and hearing loss has been reported, although there have been no reports investigating the serial changes in the sCr level in preterm neonates treated with GM. The present study evaluated the serial changes in the sCr level and the incidence of hearing loss in preterm neonates treated with GM. This study included 56 neonates born at a gestational age of 32-36 weeks. Fifteen (group 1) and 20 (group 2) neonates were treated with 2.5 mg/kg of GM every 12 h and 4 mg/kg of GM every 36 h, respectively. Group 3 included 21 neonates without GM therapy. Serum GM levels, serial changes in the sCr levels, and the incidence of hearing loss were then compared among the three groups. The serum trough GM level in group 2 was significantly lower than that in group 1 (P < 0.001), whereas the serum peak GM levels in these groups were almost the same. The ratio of the sCr level at birth to that at the 5th day of life in group 1 was the lowest among the 3 groups. No neonates had hearing loss. GM therapy worsened the sCr level in late preterm neonates, especially those with multiple doses per day. The appropriate use of GM is needed in order to prevent the occurrence of nephrotoxicity.

Individualization of treatment with gentamicin in neonates based on drug concentration in the blood serum.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To evaluate how useful it is to make measurements of gentamicin concentrations in newborns' blood in order to optimize antibiotic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Material and methods: 73 newborns empirically treated with gentamicin, in doses consistent with the Neofax® guidelines. There were 152 measurements of maximum and minimum serum gentamicin concentrations. Samples were determined based on the chemiluminescence technique on the Siemens Advia Centaur analyzer. The concentrations of gentamicin that were measured were compared with various therapeutic ranges used in the literature. RESULTS: Results: According to the standards adopted in the University Hospital in Wroclaw, the maximum concentration was reached in 38.16% of all the children, while the minimum in 26.32%. In other children the concentrations were below or above the therapeutic range. According to the Neofax® guidelines, the intended maximum concentration was observed in 71.05% of the newborns, and the minimum in 32.89%. The minimum concentration of <2 mg/L was found in 93.42% of the newborns, while >2 mg/L was determined in 33.33%, despite a 48-hour dosing interval. These were premature babies (<28th week of gestational age) and 55.56% of them reached a maximum concentration of 5-12 mg/L. There was no significant correlation between maximum or minimum concentration and gestational age or body weight. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: 1. The dosage of gentamicin in newborns according to the Neofax® recommendations does not ensure achieving the intended serum antibiotic concentrations. 2. In order to optimize gentamicin therapy in newborns it is necessary to individualize the dose based on measurements of drug concentrations in the blood and pharmacokinetic calculations.

PHARMECMO: Therapeutic drug monitoring and adequacy of current dosing regimens of antibiotics in patients on Extracorporeal Life Support.

INTRODUCTION: Optimisation of antibiotic therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients remains a pharmacological challenge. The objective of this study was to observe the plasma concentrations of commonly used antibiotics in intensive care for patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PHARMECMO study was a pilot, prospective study, conducted in a cardiac surgery intensive care unit. Every adult patient under ECMO support, with known or suspected sepsis and receiving antibiotic therapy, was eligible for inclusion. Plasma concentrations of antibiotics were determined by a combination of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Forty-four eligible patients were enrolled for 68 inclusions on a twelve-month period. For the association piperacillin-tazobactam (n=19), 68.7% of CT50 and 93.7% of Cmin reached the pharmacokinetic goals defined (64 mg.L-1 for CT50 and 16 mg.L-1 for Cmin). For cefotaxime (n=12), the pharmacokinetic goals (4 mg.L-1 for CT50 and 1 mg.L-1 for Cmin) were achieved in 100% of the cases for CT50 and in 81.8% of the cases for Cmin. Regarding imipenem (n=10), the pharmacokinetic goals were 16 mg.L-1 for CT50 and 4 mg.L-1 for Cmin. Only one CT50 was above 16 mg.L-1. For Cmin, 60% of the doses did not reach the target concentration. In our 10 patients, only one patient was considered as reaching the pharmacokinetic goals. Finally, for amikacin (n=6), four Cmax (66.7%) were infra-therapeutics for a target between 60 and 80 mg.L-1. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring could optimise the achievement of pharmacokinetic objectives associated with an effective antibiotic therapy. For most patients, the recommended doses of imipenem and amikacin did not achieve the pK targets.

The effect of hemorrhagic shock and intraosseous adrenaline injection on the delivery of a subsequently administered drug - an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Intraosseous (IO) access is a recommended method when venous access cannot be rapidly established in an emergency. Experimental data suggest that major hemorrhage and catecholamine administration both reduce bone marrow blood flow. We studied the uptake of gentamicin as a tracer substance administered IO following adrenaline administration in hemorrhagic shock and in cardiac arrest. METHODS: Twenty anesthetized pigs underwent hemorrhage corresponding to 50% of the blood volume. They then received injections of either; adrenaline IO (n = 5), saline IO n = 5), adrenaline IO during cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, n = 5), or intravenous adrenaline. The injections were followed by an injection of gentamicin by the same route. Doses and volumes were equivalent among the groups. In all animals, mixed venous antibiotic concentrations were analyzed at 5, 15 and 30 min after administration. RESULTS: Mean (SD) plasma gentamicin concentrations (mg x L- 1) at 5 min were 26.4 (2.3) in the group with previous IO adrenaline administration, 26.6 (4.5) in the IO saline group, 31. 2 (12) in the IO adrenaline + CPR group and 23 (4.5) in the IV group. Concentrations in the CPR group were significantly higher than the others. CONCLUSIONS: No impairment of drug uptake with IO administration after recent IO adrenaline exposure was demonstrable in this shock model.

A clinical decision support system to improve adequate dosing of gentamicin and vancomycin.

OBJECTIVE: Gentamicin and vancomycin meet the criteria for measuring plasma concentrations during therapy. However, compliance with the accompanying guidelines remains low. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the implementation of a clinical decision support system, which displays an alert if a plasma concentration should be measured and a daily reviewed patient list resulted in improved compliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This intervention study was performed at the Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem/Hoofddorp, the Netherlands. The authors included 261 treatments with either gentamicin or vancomycin intravenously for at least 48 h in the year before and after implementation of the clinical decision support system in May 2015. The authors analyzed whether plasma concentrations were measured sooner and more frequently after the implementation, and determined whether the time until the correct dosage, with adequate drug concentrations, was reduced after implementation. RESULTS: Before implementation, plasma concentrations were measured within 72 h in 47% of the treatments. After implementation, this percentage increased to 80% (p < 0.01). After implementation, the time was significantly shorter until the correct dosage was given. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a clinical decision support system and a patient list resulted in improved compliance with the guidelines and optimized the treatment with gentamicin and vancomycin.

Interest of therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides administered by a monodose regimen.

BACKGROUND: Although the once-daily regimen of aminoglycosides (AG) is considered as predominantly used by many centers, the level of evidence of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of AG in cases of once-daily has not been clearly defined. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of TDM in achievement or maintaining target serum concentrations in patients receiving once-daily administration of AG. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients having received a once daily amikacin or gentamicin and underwent routine TDM. A longitudinal follow up was performed. Data were analyzed according to the adhesion or not to recommendations. A logistic regression was performed in order to evaluate the effect of covariates (age, gender, weight, creatinine clearance [CLcr], TDM-based dose adjustment, weighted dose of AG) on the achievement of non-toxic Cmin. RESULTS: A total 437 blood samples issued from 324 patients were analyzed. The cut-off value of Clcr associated with a risk of toxic Cmin was≤41.66mL/min (OR: 11.29; 95%CI: 7.21-17.61; P<0.0001). Eighty-eight patients (27.1%) have at least two sampling points. The univariate analysis showed that the age, weight, CLcr and TDM-based dose adjustment were found to be significant factors in the achievement of non-toxic Cmin. In multivariate analysis, only TDM-based dose adjustment remains a significant factor in the achievement of non-toxic Cmin (OR: 6.66; 95%CI: 2.26-19.63; P=0.0006). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the usefulness of TDM-based dosing adjustment of AG antibiotics in achieving nontoxic trough concentrations, particularly in critically ill patients, as they are prone to a renal impairment.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Gentamicin in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Gentamicin pharmacokinetics may be altered in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Description of gentamicin pharmacokinetics and relevant variables can improve dosing. METHODS: A retrospective population pharmacokinetic study was designed, and pediatric patients who received gentamicin while undergoing ECMO therapy over a period of 6 1/2 years were included. Data collection included the following: patient demographics, serum creatinine, albumin, hematocrit, gentamicin dosing and serum concentrations, urine output, and ECMO circuit parameters. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with NONMEM, and simulation was performed to identify empiric doses to achieve therapeutic serum concentrations. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients met study criteria (75.7% male patients), with a median age of 0.17 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.12-0.82] years. Primary indications for ECMO included the following: congenital diaphragmatic hernia (n = 17), persistent pulmonary hypertension (n = 5), and septic shock (n = 4). Patients received a total of 117 gentamicin doses [median 1.8 (IQR 1.4-2.9) mg/kg/dose] and had 125 serum concentrations measured at a median of 22.8 (IQR 15.8-25.5) hours after a dose. Population pharmacokinetic analysis identified a 2-compartment model with additive error as the best fit. Covariates included the following: allometrically scaled fat-free mass on clearance, central and peripheral volume of distribution (VDcentral and VDperipheral), and intercompartmental clearance; serum creatinine on clearance; ultrafiltration rate on central volume of distribution. Simulation identified dosage of 4-5 mg/kg/dose every 24 hours for neonates and infants as an acceptable empiric dosing regimen. Children and adolescents had elevated trough concentrations when dosed according to traditional dosing methods. CONCLUSIONS: Fat-free mass should be used to dose gentamicin in pediatric ECMO patients. Serum creatinine is a marker of gentamicin clearance and should be used to adjust gentamicin dosing in pediatric ECMO patients.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous gentamicin in healthy young-adult compared to aged alpacas.

The study objective was to evaluate the effects of age on aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in eight young-adult (<4 years) and eight aged (≥14 years) healthy alpacas, receiving a single 6.6 mg/kg intravenous gentamicin injection. Heparinized plasma samples were obtained at designated time points following drug administration and frozen at -80°C until assayed by a validated immunoassay (QMS® ). Compartmental and noncompartmental analyses of gentamicin plasma concentrations versus time were performed using WinNonlin (v6.4) software. Baseline physical and hematological parameters were not significantly different between young and old animals with the exception of sex. Data were best fitted to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. The peak drug concentration at 30 min after dosing (23.8 ± 2.1 vs. 26.1 ± 2 µg/ml, p = .043) and area under the curve (70.4 ± 10.5 vs. 90.4 ± 17.6 µg hr/ml, p = .015) were significantly lower in young-adult compared to aged alpacas. Accordingly, young alpacas had a significantly greater systemic clearance than older animals (95.5 ± 14.4 and 75.6 ± 16.1 ml hr-1 kg-1 ; p = .018), respectively). In conclusion, a single 6.6 mg/kg intravenous gentamicin injection achieves target blood concentrations of >10 times the MIC of gentamicin-susceptible pathogens with MIC levels ≤2 µg/ml, in both young-adult and geriatric alpacas. However, the observed reduction in gentamicin clearance in aged alpacas may increase their risk for gentamicin-related adverse drug reactions.

Predictive performance of a gentamicin population pharmacokinetic model in two western populations of critically ill patients.

External validation of population pharmacokinetic (PK) models is warranted before they can be clinically applied to aid in antibiotic dose selection. The primary objective of this study was to assess the predictive performance of a gentamicin population PK model in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in two independent western populations of critically ill patients. METHODS: Data were collected from the ICU where the model was developed (Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam [AMC]) and from the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes). Primary endpoints were bias and accuracy. The model was regarded as valid if bias was not significantly different from 0 and accuracy was equal to or less than 2.5 mg/L. Non-linear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The AMC validation dataset consisted of 192 samples from 66 ICU patients and the CHU Nîmes dataset of 230 gentamicin samples from 50 ICU patients. The structural model predicted the gentamicin plasma concentrations in the AMC population with a non-significant bias (0.35, 95%CI: -0.11-0.81) and a sufficient accuracy of 2.5 mg/L (95%CI: 2.3-2.8). The gentamicin plasma concentrations were overpredicted in the CHU Nîmes population with a significant bias of 4.8 mg/L (95%CI: 4.00-5.62) and an accuracy of 5.5 mg/L (95%CI: 4.7-6.2). CONCLUSION: The model is valid for use in the AMC ICU population but not in the CHU Nîmes ICU population. This illustrates that caution is needed when using a population PK model in an external population.

Monitoring of gentamicin serum concentrations in obstetrics and gynaecology patients in Namibia.

Background Therapeutic drug monitoring is frequently used to optimize the gentamicin dose. Objective The study investigated whether a 240 mg once daily standard dose achieves the recommended target serum gentamicin concentrations. Setting The prospective, observational study took place in the 2 major public hospitals in Namibia. Method Twenty-nine female patients receiving a standard dose (240 mg gentamicin once daily) participated in the study. Two blood samples were withdrawn to estimate gentamicin pharmacokinetic parameters. Serum creatinine was used to calculate creatinine clearance with the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CLcr), and estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. Main outcome measure The outcome measure was the proportion of patients receiving 240 mg gentamicin once daily having Cmax values above 15 mg/L. Results Total body weight (TBW) and body mass index were highly variable: 43-115 kg, and 17.3-41.3 kg/m2, respectively. The gentamicin dose normalized for TBW (adjusted body weight for obese patients) was relatively low, i.e. 4.2 ± 0.8 mg/kg (mean SD). Gentamicin Cmax was 14.4 ± 4.7 mg/L; only 9 patients (31%) had a Cmax > 15 g/mL. eGFR (MDRD-4) correlated well with CLcr, but eGFR (EPI-CKD) formula showed systematic deviations from CLcr. Conclusions (1) a standard 240 mg dose results in gentamicin Cmax values below 15 mg/L in the majority of the patients, (2) eGFR formulas to estimate kidney function will have to be evaluated for their usefulness in the Namibian patient population.

An evaluation of serum gentamicin concentrations and bacterial susceptibility to gentamicin in equine practice.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data allow more informed use of gentamicin. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To measure peak and trough serum gentamicin concentrations in horses after a 6.6 mg/kg dose of gentamicin given IV and the MIC of gentamicin of bacteria for which gentamicin might be selected. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of hospital records. Peak and trough plasma gentamicin concentrations were measured after 6.6 mg/kg gentamicin IV in 339 hospitalized horses. The MIC of gentamicin was measured for 503 isolates from ambulatory practice and 33 from hospital practice. The distribution of gentamicin concentrations and MIC results were compared to current recommendations for MIC breakpoints. RESULTS: The median serum gentamicin concentration at 60 minutes after administration (C60min ) was 21.4 µg/mL with a distribution indicating that bacteria with MIC ≥2 µg/mL were unlikely to be exposed to sufficient gentamicin for effective killing. Approximately 90% of isolates from ambulatory practice and 36% of hospital isolates had MICs at or below breakpoints for susceptibility with most of the remainder unlikely to be responsive, even to higher IV doses. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Gentamicin at a dosage of 6.6 mg/kg IV is likely to be effective against the majority of infections encountered in ambulatory practice, but less effective in an equine hospital. Because there was a dichotomy of most bacteria as being clearly susceptible or clearly resistant to gentamicin, it appears unlikely that higher doses would have been more efficacious, especially in the hospitalized population in our study.