68 Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Ovarian Tumors : Potential to Differentiate Benign and Malignant Tumors Before Surgery: A Preliminary Report.

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT: Ovarian cancer is usually diagnosed in an advanced stage of disease due to the absence of specific symptoms and a lack of sensitive diagnostic methods. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed on prostate cancer cells but can be found in other tumors such as ovarian cancer.The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in detection of ovarian neoplasm before surgical treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight women with mean age of 56.0 ± 16.2 years were included in the study. All patients underwent transvaginal ultrasound followed by CT scan of the chest and abdomen as qualification for surgery. Within a 1-week interval, PET/CT was performed on a Siemens Biograph scanner, 60 minutes after injection of 2 MBq/kg 68 Ga-PSMA-11. RESULTS: In 3 cases (37.5%), the 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was positive, whereas histological examination confirmed 2 serous ovarian cancer cases and 1 ovarian borderline tumor. The SUV max in the serous ovarian cancer was 8.7 and 4.1, and in the borderline ovarian tumor, it was 13.8. No correlation was found between antigen CA-125 level and 68 Ga-PSMA expression. Range of tumor SUV max was not correlated with stage of disease. The remaining 62.5% (5/8) were negative in 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and histopathology confirmed benign pelvic tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The initial experience supports the potential to use 68 Ga-PSMA-11 in ovarian cancer to differentiate malignant and benign tumors before surgery.This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw (KB/2/A/2018).

68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT as a clinical decision-making tool in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: PSMA PET/CT has demonstrated superior sensitivity over conventional imaging in the detection of local and distant recurrence in biochemically relapsed (BCR) prostate cancer. We prospectively investigated the management impact of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in men with BCR, with the aim of identifying baseline clinicopathological predictors for management change. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with BCR who met eligibility criteria underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at Monash Health (Melbourne, Australia). Intended management plans were prospectively documented before and after 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential clinicopathological predictors of management change. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the nature of these changes. RESULTS: Seventy men underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Median age was 67 years (IQR 63-72) and median PSA was 0.48 ng/ml (IQR 0.21-1.9). PSMA-avid disease was observed in 56% (39/70) of patients. Pre-scan management plan was altered following scanning in 43% (30/70) of patients. Management changes were significantly more common in patients with higher baseline PSA levels (PSA≥2 ng/ml, p = 0.01). 18/36 (50%) of the patients initially planned for watchful waiting had their management changed, including the use of salvage pelvic radiotherapy (n = 7) and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to oligometastatic disease (n = 6). CONCLUSION: Management change after 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT for BCR is common and typically resulted in treatment intensification strategies in those planned for a watchful waiting approach. This study adds to the growing pool of evidence supporting the clinical utility of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the care of patients with BCR after definitive therapy.

Prospective assessment of AR splice variant and PSMA detection on circulating tumor cells of mCRPC patients: preliminary analysis of patients enrolled in PRIMERA trial (NCT04188275).

In our institution, a prospective observational trial testing micro-RNA (miRNA) and ARV7 mutational status in metastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), is currently recruiting (PRIMERA trial, NCT04188275). A pre-planned interim analysis was performed when 50% of the planned accrual was reached. In this report, we explored the predictive value of Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) detection in mCRPC patients undergoing 1st line therapy. Moreover, ARV7, ARFL, PSMA and PSA expression on CTC was reported to explore potential correlation with patient prognosis and response to therapy. PRIMERA is a prospective observational trial enrolling mCRPC patients undergoing standard treatment (ARTA + ADT) after I line ADT failure. Clinical and pathological features were collected. Outcomes selected for this preliminary analysis were time to castration resistance (TTCR), PSA at 8 weeks after ARTA therapy start, PSA drop at 8 weeks, Overall PSA drop, PSA nadir. Correlation between these outcomes and CTC detection was tested. Expression of ARV7, ARFL, PSA and PSMA was explored in CTC+ patients to assess their prevalence in this cohort and their impact on selected outcomes. Median TTCR was significantly shorter in CTC+ vs CTC- patients (32.3 vs 75 months, respectively, p = 0.03) and in ARFL+ vs ARFL- patients (30.2 vs 51.1 months, respectively, p = 0.02). ARV7, PSMA and PSA expression on CTC had no impact on median TTCR, nor on biochemical response to therapy. Patients in whom CTC and ARFL expression were detected had significant reduced TTCR. However, PSA response was not influenced by CTCs detection and specific biomarkers expression.

Establishment and prospective validation of an SUVmax cutoff value to discriminate clinically significant prostate cancer from benign prostate diseases in patients with suspected prostate cancer by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: a real-world study.

Background and Aims: The aims of this study were to establish a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) cutoff to discriminate clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) from benign prostate disease (BPD) by 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA-11) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa), and to perform a prospective real-world validation of this cutoff value. Methods: The study included a training cohort to identify an SUVmax cutoff value and a prospective real-world cohort to validate it. A retrospective analysis assessed 135 patients with suspected PCa in a large tertiary care hospital in China who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. All patients were suspected of having PCa based on symptoms, digital rectal examination (DRE), total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) level, and multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). The 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT results were evaluated using histopathological results from transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core biopsy with necessary targeted biopsy as references. Patients with Gleason scores (GS) ≥7 from the biopsy results were diagnosed with csPCa, and patients with negative biopsy and follow-up results were diagnosed with BPD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the optimal SUVmax cutoff value. The cutoff value was prospectively validated in 58 patients with suspected PCa. The diagnostic benefits of the cutoff value for clinical decision making were also evaluated. Results: According to ROC curve analysis, the most appropriate SUVmax cutoff value for discriminating csPCa from BPD was 5.30 (sensitivity, 85.85%; specificity, 86.21%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.893). The cutoff achieved a sensitivity of 83.33%, a specificity of 81.25%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 92.11%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 65.00%, and an accuracy of 82.76% in the prospective validation cohort. Metastases were used as an indicator to reduce false negative results in patients with SUVmax ≤ 5.30. In patients without metastases, an SUVmax value of 5.30 was also the best cutoff to diagnose localized csPCa (sensitivity, 80.43%; specificity, 86.21%; AUC, 0.852). The cutoff discriminated localized csPCa from BPD with a sensitivity of 76.19%, a specificity of 81.25%, a PPV of 84.21%, an NPV of 72.22%, and an accuracy of 78.38% in the prospective validation cohort. The cutoff, combined with metastases, achieved an accuracy of 89.12% in all patients, increasing accuracy by 8.29% and reducing equivocal results compared with manual reading. There was a strong correlation between SUVmax and PSMA expression (rs = 0.831, P < 0.001) and a moderate correlation between SUVmax and GS (rs = 0.509, P < 0.001). The PSMA expression and SUVmax values of patients with csPCa were significantly higher than those of patients with BPD (P < 0.001). Conclusion: We established and prospectively validated the best SUVmax cutoff value (5.30) for discriminating csPCa from BPD with high accuracy in patients with suspected PCa. 5.30 is an effective cutoff to discriminate csPCa patients with or without metastases. The cutoff may provide a potential tool for the precise identification of csPCa by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, ensuring high accuracy and reducing equivocal results.

Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of an Al18F radiofluorinated bivalent PSMA ligand.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has become as an outstanding prostate cancer-related target for diagnostic imaging and targeted radiotherapy. Clinical studies on a few PSMA radiotracers are currently underway to determine their efficacy as imaging agents to detect prostate cancer. To improve tumor retention and tumor-to-normal tissue contrast, we herein report the synthesis and preclinical evaluation of an Al18F-labeled bivalent PSMA ligand (18F-Bi-PSMA). 18F-Bi-PSMA was successful automated preparation and in vitro evaluation showed that 18F-Bi-PSMA was potent binding affinity, high specificity, and rapid internalization in PSMA-expressing cells. Biodistribution studies revealed a high and specific tumor uptake of 20.5 ± 3.5 %ID/g in 22Rv1 tumor-bearing mice. Furthermore, compared to the clinically used monomeric PSMA-targeting tracers, 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007, 18F-Bi-PSMA exhibited improved pharmacokinetics and higher tumor uptake, as well as better tumor-to-normal tissue contrast, resulting in considerably high imaging quality. Our findings indicated that the bivalent PSMA radioligand, 18F-Bi-PSMA, was successfully synthesized and ideal imaging properties.

Prostate Cancer Targeted X-Ray Fluorescence Imaging via Gold Nanoparticles Functionalized With Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA).

PURPOSE: The gold nanoparticle (GNP) as a promising theranostic probe has been increasingly studied. The tumor-targeting efficiency of GNPs is crucial to increase the therapeutic ratio. In this study, we developed PSMA-targeted GNPs to enhance GNP uptake in prostate cancer and developed an x-ray fluorescence imaging system to noninvasively monitor and assess GNP delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For targeted therapy of prostate cancer, anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) antibodies were conjugated onto PEGylated GNPs through 1-ethyl-3-(-3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) (EDC/NHS) chemistry. In vivo imaging was implemented using an in-house-developed dual-modality computed tomography (CT) and x-ray fluorescence CT (XFCT) system on mice bearing subcutaneous LNCaP prostate tumors. After intravenous administration of GNPs (15 mg/mL, 200 µL), the x-ray fluorescence signals from the tumor were collected at various time points (5 minutes to approximately 30 hours) for GNP pharmacokinetics analysis. At 24 hours after administration, x-ray fluorescence projection (XRFproj) and XFCT imaging were conducted to evaluate the prostate tumor uptake of active- and passive-targeting GNPs. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis was adopted as a benchmark to verify the quantification accuracy of XRFproj/XFCT imaging. RESULTS: Fluorescence microscopic imaging confirmed the enhanced (approximately 4 times) targeting efficiency of PSMA-targeted GNPs in vitro. The pharmacokinetics analysis showed enhanced tumor uptake/retention of PSMA-targeted GNPs and revealed that the peak tumor accumulation appeared at approximately 24 hours after intravenous administration. Both XRFproj and XFCT imaging presented their accuracy in quantifying GNPs within tumors noninvasively. Moreover, XFCT imaging verified its unique capabilities to simultaneously determine the heterogeneous spatial distribution and the concentration of GNPs within tumors in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: In conjunction with PSMA-targeted GNPs, XRFproj/XFCT would be a highly sensitive tool for targeted imaging of prostate cancer, benefiting the elucidation of mechanisms of GNP-assisted prostate-cancer therapy.

Phase 3 multicenter randomized trial of PSMA PET/CT prior to definitive radiation therapy for unfavorable intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer [PSMA dRT]: study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Definitive radiation therapy (dRT) is an effective initial treatment of intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa). PSMA PET/CT is superior to standard of care imaging (CT, MRI, bone scan) for detecting regional and distant metastatic PCa. PSMA PET/CT thus has the potential to guide patient selection and the planning for dRT and improve patient outcomes. METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized phase 3 trial (NCT04457245). We will randomize 312 patients to proceed with standard dRT (control Arm, n = 150), or undergo a PSMA PET/CT scan at the study site (both 18F-DCFPyL and 68Ga-PSMA-11 can be used) prior to dRT planning (intervention arm, n = 162). dRT will be performed at the treating radiation oncologist facility. In the control arm, dRT will be performed as routinely planned. In the intervention arm, the treating radiation oncologist can incorporate PSMA PET/CT findings into the RT planning. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is administered per discretion of the treating radiation oncologist and may be modified as a result of the PSMA PET/CT results. We assume that approximately 8% of subjects randomized to the PSMA PET arm will be found to have M1 disease and thus will be more appropriate candidates for long-term systemic or multimodal therapy, rather than curative intent dRT. PET M1 patients will thus not be included in the primary endpoint analysis. The primary endpoint is the success rate of patients with unfavorable IR and HR PCa after standard dRT versus PSMA PET-based dRT. Secondary Endpoints (whole cohort) include progression free survival (PFS), metastasis-free survival after initiation of RT, overall survival (OS), % of change in initial treatment intent and Safety. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized phase 3 prospective trial designed to determine whether PSMA PET/CT molecular imaging can improve outcomes in patients with PCa who receive dRT. In this trial the incorporation of PSMA PET/CT may improve the success rate of curative intent radiotherapy in two ways: to optimize patient selection as a biomarker and to personalizes the radiotherapy plan. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UCLA IND#147591 ○ Submission: 02.27.2020 ○ Safe-to-proceed letter issued by FDA: 04.01.2020 UCLA IRB #20-000378 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04457245 . Date of Registry: 07.07.2020. Essen EudraCT 2020-003526-23.

Molecular imaging of orthotopic prostate cancer with nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents targeted to PSMA.

Ultrasound imaging is routinely used to guide prostate biopsies, yet delineation of tumors within the prostate gland is extremely challenging, even with microbubble (MB) contrast. A more effective ultrasound protocol is needed that can effectively localize malignancies for targeted biopsy or aid in patient selection and treatment planning for organ-sparing focal therapy. This study focused on evaluating the application of a novel nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent targeted to the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA-targeted NBs) in ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer (PCa) in vivo using a clinically relevant orthotopic tumor model in nude mice. Our results demonstrated that PSMA-targeted NBs had increased extravasation and retention in PSMA-expressing orthotopic mouse tumors. These processes are reflected in significantly different time intensity curve (TIC) and several kinetic parameters for targeted versus non-targeted NBs or LUMASON MBs. These, may in turn, lead to improved image-based detection and diagnosis of PCa in the future.

Imaging expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen and response to PSMA-targeted ß-emitting radionuclide therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability with a dose-response effect in phase I/II trials in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The need for positive PSMA imaging before PSMA-TRT to select patients is largely practiced, but its utility is not proven. Given target heterogeneity, developing a biomarker to identify the optimal patient population remains an unmet need. The aim of this study was to assess PSMA uptake by imaging and response to PSMA-TRT. METHODS: We performed an analysis of men with mCRPC enrolled in sequential prospective phase I/II trials of PSMA-TRT. Each patient had baseline PSMA imaging by planar 111 In and/or 177 Lu SPECT (N = 171) or 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (N = 44), but the results were not used to include/exclude treatment. Semiquantitative imaging scores (IS) on a 0-4 scale were assigned based on PSMA uptake in tumors compared to liver uptake. We compared the ≥50% PSA decline response proportions between low (0-1) and high (2-4) PSMA IS using the χ2 -test. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to understand the relationship between independent and dependent variables, including IS, radionuclide activity (dose) administered, CALGB (Halabi) prognostic risk score, prior taxane use. RESULTS: 215 men with progressive mCRPC received PSMA-TRT as follows: 177 Lu-J591 (n = 137), 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (n = 44), 90 Y-J591 (n = 28), 177 Lu-J591 + 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (n = 6). High PSMA expression (IS 2-4) was found in 160 (74.4%) patients and was significantly associated with more frequent ≥ 50% PSA reduction (26.2 vs. 7.3%, p = .006). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher IS was associated with a ≥50% decrease in PSA, even after accounting for CALGB (Halabi) prognostic score, the dose administered, and previous taxane use (OR, 4.72; 95% CI, 1.71-16.85; p = .006). Patients with low PSMA expression (N = 55, 24.7%) were less likely to respond. Thirteen of 26 (50%) with no PSMA uptake (IS = 0) had post-PSMA-TRT PSA decline with 2 (7.7%) having ≥ 50% PSA declines. CONCLUSION: Collectively, the data provide evidence in favor of the hypothesis that patients with high PSMA uptake and high administered radionuclide dose correlate with a higher chance of response.

[A Case of Pelvic Lymph Node Recurrence Detected by PSMA PET/CT after Primary Proton Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer].

The patient is a 72-year-old man who was referred to our hospital with an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level. He was diagnosed with prostate cancer (cT2aN0M0) at the age of 62 years. He had undergone radical proton beam radiotherapy. The PSA level decreased to a nadir of 0.217 ng/ml after 5 years, gradually increasing thereafter to 1.595 ng/ml during the next 5 years. Although magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate showed an abnormal signal area in the prostate, repeated biopsies of the prostate revealed no malignant findings. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT), bone scintigraphy and fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT did not detect any abnormalities in the prostate or metastatic lesions. ¹8F-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT showed no accumulation in the prostate, but some accumulation in a left obturator lymph node. Open pelvic lymph node dissection was performed, and pathological examination confirmed lymph node metastasis from the prostate cancer. The PSA level decreased from 2.482 ng/ml preoperatively to 0.391 ng/ml at 3 months postoperatively. PSMA-PET/CT might be useful for early localization of recurrent lesions in biochemical recurrence after radical treatment for prostate cancer.

Evaluating determinants of receipt of molecular imaging in biochemical recurrent prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Molecular imaging with novel radiotracers is changing the treatment landscape in prostate cancer (PCa). Currently, standard of care includes either conventional and molecular imaging at time of biochemical recurrence (BCR). This study evaluated the determinants of and cost associated with utilization of molecular imaging for BCR PCa. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study among men with BCR PCa from June 2018 to May 2019. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to analyze the primary outcome: receipt of molecular imaging (e.g. Fluciclovine PET and Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen PET) as part of diagnostic work-up for BCR PCa. Multivariate linear regression models were used to analyze the secondary outcome: overall healthcare cost within a 1-year time frame. RESULTS: The study sample included 234 patients; 79.1% White, 2.1% Black, 8.5% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 10.3% Other. The majority were 55 years or older (97.9%) and publicly insured (74.8%). Analysis indicated a one-unit reduction in PSA is associated with 1.3 times higher likelihood of receiving molecular imaging (p < 0.01). Analysis found that privately insured patients were associated with approximately $500,000 more in hospital reimbursement (p < 0.01) as compared to the publicly insured. Additionally, a one-unit increase in PSA is associated with $6254 increase in hospital reimbursement or an increase in total payments by 2.1% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Higher PSA was associated with lower likelihood for molecular imaging and higher cost in a one-year time frame. Higher cost was also associated with private insurance, but there was no clear relationship between insurance type and imaging type.

Application of an inhibitor-based probe to reveal the distribution of membrane PSMA in dSTORM imaging.

Relying on an inhibitor-based probe, we reveal the clustered distribution of membrane PSMA by dSTORM imaging and uncover its potential interaction with folate receptor. This inhibitor-based strategy realizes more accurate labeling than antibody labeling, which would make it a powerful tool in the field of dSTORM imaging.

Immunosensing prostate-specific antigen: Faradaic vs non-Faradaic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis on interdigitated microelectrode device.

This work explores Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) detection for a highly-sensitive quantification of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in Faradaic (f-EIS) and non-Faradaic modes (nf-EIS). Immobilization of monoclonal antibody specific to PSA (anti-PSA) was performed using 1-ethyl-3-dimethylaminopropylcarbodiimide hydrochloride and N-hydroxysuccinimide crosslinking agents in order to conjugate carboxylic (-COOH) terminated group of 16-Mercaptoundecanoic acid with amine (-NH3+) on anti-PSA epitope. This approach offers simple and efficient approach to form a strong, covalently bound thiol-gold (SAu) for a reliable SAM layer formation. Studies on the topographic of pristine Au-IDE surface were performed by Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy techniques, meanwhile a 3-dimensional optical surface profiler, Atomic Force Microscopy and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy techniques were used to validate the successful functionalization steps on the sensor transducer surface. Detection of PSA in f-EIS mode was carried out by measuring the response in charge transfer resistance (Rct) and impedance change (Z), meanwhile in nf-EIS mode, the changes in device capacitance was monitored. In f-EIS mode, the sensor reveals a logarithmic detection of PSA in a range of 100 ng/ml down to 0.01 ng/ml in Phosphate Buffered Saline with a recorded sensitivity of 2.412 kΩ/log10 ([PSA] ng/ml) and the limit of detection (LOD) down to 0.01 ng/ml. The nf-EIS detection mode yields a logarithmic detection range of 5000 ng/ml down to 0.5 ng/ml, with a sensitivity of 8.570 nF/log10 ([PSA] ng/ml) and an LOD of 0.5 ng/ml. The developed bio-assay yields great device stability, specificity to PSA and repeatability of detection that would pave its way for the future development into portable lab-on-chip bio-sensing system.

Recent developments in the treatment of non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

Non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is defined as a disease state withlack of radiographic evidence of metastatic disease, a confirmed rising PSA level on continuous ADT and maintaining a castrate level of testosterone following definitive therapy. Prior to the publication of PROSPER, SPARTAN and ARAMIS, no trials have demonstrated a clinical benefit for these patients. Recently enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide respectively, were tested in this disease setting with metastasis free survival (MFS) as the primary endpoint for each trial. In this review article, we define key terms related to the discussion of nmCRPC, examine the clinical trial design, and safety profile for each of these three key clinical trials and present updated overall survival (OS) results from these studies. Also we specifically discuss the key clinical trial results including the primary endpoint of MFS for each trial as well as quality of life effects of these three androgen receptor antagonists. Finally, this article examines the potential impact of molecular imaging testing on the applicability of these clinical trial results.

Analysis of PSMA expression and outcome in patients with advanced Prostate Cancer receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy.

Rationale: PSMA-PET-CT enables measuring molecular expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in vivo, which is the target molecule of 177Lu-PSMA-617 (Lu-PSMA) therapy. However, the correlation of PSMA expression and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with Lu-PSMA therapy is currently unclear; especially with regard to coexistence of high and low PSMA expressing metastases. To this end, this retrospective single arm study elucidates the correlation of PSMA expression and overall survival in patients treated with Lu-PSMA therapy. Additionally, PET based criteria to define low PSMA expression were explored. Methods: Eighty-five patients referred to Lu-PSMA therapy were included in the analysis. Pretherapeutic 68Ga-PSMA-PET-CT scans were available for all patients. SUVmax of the highest PSMA expressing metastasis (PSMAmax), SUVmax of the lowest PSMA expressing metastasis (PSMAmin), and average SUVmax of all metastases (PSMAaverage) amongst other PET parameters were measured for each patient. A log-rank cutoff-finder was used to determine low (lowPSMAaverage) and high (highPSMAaverage) average PSMA expression as well as low (lowPSMAmin) and high (highPSMAmin) minimal PSMA expression. Results: PSMAaverage was a significant prognosticator of overall survival in contrast to PSMAmax (HR: 0.959; p = 0.047 vs. HR: 0.992; p = 0.231). Optimal log rank cut-offs were: PSMAaverage = 14.3; PSMAmin = 10.2. Patients with low average PSMA expression (lowPSMAaverage) had significantly shorter survival compared to those with high average expression (highPSMAaverage) (5.3 vs. 15.1 months; p < 0.001; HR: 3.738, 95%CI = 1.953-7.154; p < 0.001). Patients with low PSMA expressing metastases (lowPSMAmin) had shorter survival compared to those without a low PSMA expressing metastasis (highPSMAmin) (p = 0.003; 7.9 months vs. 21.3; HR: 4.303, 95%CI = 1.521-12.178; p = 0.006). Patients that were classified as highPSMAaverage but with lowPSMAmin had an intermediate overall survival (11.4 months; longer compared to lowPSMAaverage, 5.3 months, p = 0.002; but shorter compared to highPSMAmin, 21.3 months, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Low average PSMA expression is a negative prognosticator of overall survival. Absence of low PSMA expressing metastases is associated with best overall survival and the maximum PSMA expression seems not suited to prognosticate overall survival. Low PSMA expression might therefore be a negative prognosticator for the outcome of patients treated with Lu-PSMA therapy. Future studies are warranted to elucidate the degree of low PSMA expression tolerable for Lu-PSMA therapy.

Predictors of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA/FOLH1) Expression in a Genomic Database.

OBJECTIVE: To assess predictors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in a genomic database; positron emission tomography with PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals is increasingly being utilized. METHODS: The de-identified Decipher Biosciences database, which includes expression for more than 46,000 coding and noncoding genes per patient, was queried for expression of FOLH1 (PSMA). Prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and received the Decipher Test were included in the analysis. PSMA expression was compared to the Gleason Grade Group, Decipher risk category (a validated 22 biomarker genomic score), basal versus luminal molecular subtype, and androgen receptor activity. Multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The Decipher de-identified Decipher Biosciences database contained 16,807 men who underwent prostatectomy with the average age being 65-year old and most being Gleason Grade Group 2 (35%) or 3 (27%). Higher Grade Group was associated with higher PSMA expression except in Grade Group 5 [Grade group: 1 (0.66), 2 (0.84), 3 (0.99), 4 (1.07), 5 (0.99), P <.001]. Luminal subtype was found to have much higher PSMA expression when compared to basal (1.01 vs 0.68, P <.001). The androgen receptor activity signature demonstrated a dramatic difference between basal (0.19) and luminal (0.62) subtypes (P <.001). In the multivariable model, luminal patients, high androgen receptor activity scores, and high Grade Groups were significantly associated with higher FOLH1 percentile rank (P <.001). CONCLUSION: High PSMA expression (FOLH1) was associated with high androgen receptor activity and luminal subtype. Genomic tests could aid in predicting, interpreting, and/or directing PSMA theranostics.

Efficacy of repeated PSMA PET-directed radiotherapy for oligorecurrent prostate cancer after initial curative therapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of prostate cancer (PCa) patients diagnosed with oligorecurrent disease and treated with a first and a second PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand) PET(positron-emission tomography)-directed radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with oligorecurrent relapse after curative therapy received a first PSMA PET-directed RT of all metastases. After biochemical progression, all patients received a second PSMA PET-directed RT of all metastases. The main outcome parameters were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and androgen deprivation therapy-free survival (ADT-FS). The intervals of BPFS were analyzed separately as follows: the interval from the last day of PSMA PET-directed RT to the first biochemical progression was defined as bPFS_1 and the interval from second PSMA PET-directed RT to further biochemical progression was defined as bPFS_2. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 39.5 months (18-60). One out of 32 (3.1%) patients died after 47 months of progressive metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). All patients showed biochemical responses after the first PSMA PET-directed RT and the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before RT was 1.70 ng/mL (0.2-3.8), which decreased significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.39 ng/mL (range <0.07-3.8; p = 0.004). The median PSA level at biochemical progression after the first PSMA PET-directed RT was 2.9 ng/mL (range 0.12-12.80; p = 0.24). Furthermore, the PSA level after the second PSMA PET-directed RT at the last follow-up (0.52 ng/mL, range <0.07-154.0) was not significantly different (p = 0.36) from the median PSA level (1.70 ng/mL, range 0.2-3.8) before the first PSMA PET-directed RT. The median bPFS_1 was 16.0 months after the first PSMA PET-directed RT (95% CI 11.9-19.2) and the median bPFS_2 was significantly shorter at 8.0 months (95% CI 6.3-17.7) after the second PSMA PET-directed RT (p = 0.03; 95% CI 1.9-8.3). Multivariate analysis revealed no significant parameter for bPFS_1, whereas extrapelvic disease was the only significant parameter (p = 0.02, OR 2.3; 95% CI 0.81-4.19) in multivariate analysis for bPFS_2. The median ADT-FS was 31.0 months (95% CI 20.1-41.8) and multivariate analysis showed that patients with bone metastases, compared to patients with only lymph node metastases at first PSMA PET-directed RT, had a significantly higher chance (p = 0.007, OR 4.51; 95% CI 1.8-13.47) of needing ADT at the last follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: If patients are followed up closely, including PSMA PET scans, a second PSMA PET-directed RT represents a viable treatment option for well-informed and well-selected patients.

Design, synthesis, radiolabeling and biological evaluation of new urea-based peptides targeting prostate specific membrane antigen.

Early diagnosis of Prostate cancer (PCa) plays a vital role in successful treatment increasing the survival rate of patients. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) is over-expressed in almost all types of PCa. The goal of present study is to introduce new 99mTc-labeled peptides as a PSMA inhibitor for specific detection of PCa at early stages. Based on published PSMA-targeting compounds, a set of peptides bearing the well-known Glu-Urea-Lys pharmacophore and new non-urea containing pharmacophore were designed and assessed by in silico docking studies. The selected peptides were synthesized and radiolabeled with 99mTc. The in-vitro tests (log P, stability in normal saline and fresh human plasma, and affinity toward PSMA-positive LNCaP cell line) and in-vivo characterizations of radiopeptides (biodistribution and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Computed Tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging in normal and tumour-bearing mice) were performed. The peptides 1-3 containing Glu-Urea-Lys and Glu-GABA-Asp as pharmacophores were efficiently interacted with crystal structure of PSMA and showed the highest binding energies range from -8 to -11.2 kcal/mol. Regarding the saturation binding test, 99mTc-labeled peptide 1 had the highest binding affinity (Kd = 13.58 nM) to PSMA-positive cells. SPECT-CT imaging and biodistribution studies showed high kidneys and tumour uptake 1 h post-injection of radiopeptide 1 and 2 (%ID/g tumour = 3.62 ± 0.78 and 1.8 ± 0.32, respectively). 99mTc-peptide 1 (Glu-urea-Lys-Gly-Ala-Asp-Naphthylalanine-HYNIC-99mTc) exhibited the highest binding affinity, high radiochemical purity, the most stability and high specific accumulation in prostate tumour lesions. 99mTc-peptide 1 being of comparable efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties with the well-known PET tracer (68Ga-PSMA-11) seems to be applied as a promising SPECT imaging agent to early diagnose of PCa and consequently increase survival rate of patients.

PSMA-positive nodal recurrence in prostate cancer : Salvage radiotherapy is superior to salvage lymph node dissection in retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: This analysis compares salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) to salvage lymph node radiotherapy (SLNRT) of 68Ga-PSMA PET-positive nodal recurrences after radical prostatectomy (RPE). METHODS: A total of 67 SLNRT and 33 SLND consecutive patients with pelvic and/or para-aortic nodal recurrences after RPE were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical recurrence-free survival rates (bRFS; PSA <0.2 ng/mL) were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier and survival curves were compared using the log rank test. For multivariable analysis, binary logistic regression analysis was performed (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 6-53 months) in SLND patients and 31 months (range, 3-56 months) in SLNRT patients (p = 0.027). SLNRT patients had significantly more tumours of pT3 and pT4 category (82% vs. 67%; p = 0.006), pathologically involved lymph nodes (45% vs. 27%; p = 0.001) and positive surgical margins (54% vs. 12%; p = 0.001) at time of RPE than SLND patients. PSA persistence after RPE was significantly more frequently observed in the SLNRT cohort (73% vs. 27%; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the distribution of PET-positive lymph nodes. Median PSA before SLND was higher than before SLNRT (3.07 ng/ml vs. 1.3 ng/ml; p = 0.393). The 2­year bRFS was significantly higher in the SLNRT vs. the SLND cohort (92% vs. 30%; p = 0.001) with lower rates of distant metastases (21% vs. 52%; p = 0.002) and secondary treatments (5% vs. 39%; p = 0.011) irrespective of ongoing androgen deprivation therapy at last contact. In multivariable analysis, SLNRT was significantly associated with prolonged bRFS (regression coefficient 1.436, hazard ratio 4.204, 95% CI 1.789-9.878; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on this retrospective study SLNRT might be the preferred treatment option for patients with nodal recurrence after previous RPE.