Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 139(5): EL124, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27250196

RESUMO

The present study evaluates variations in frequency and duration parameters of whistles of four dolphin species (Sotalia guianensis, Steno bredanensis, Stenella frontalis, and Tursiops truncatus), recorded in the Rio de Janeiro State Coast, Southeastern Brazil. A total of 487 whistles were analyzed. Acoustic parameters of the whistles were classified to species by discriminant function analysis. Overall classification score was 72.5%, with the highest classification score obtained for whistles of S. bredanensis and the lowest obtained for S. frontalis. Most differences were among S. bredanensis and S. guianensis, species that did not have their repertoires compared in other studies.


Assuntos
Golfinhos/fisiologia , Vocalização Animal , Acústica , Animais , Golfinho Nariz-de-Garrafa/classificação , Golfinho Nariz-de-Garrafa/fisiologia , Brasil , Análise Discriminante , Golfinhos/classificação , Análise de Fourier , Especificidade da Espécie , Stenella/classificação , Stenella/fisiologia , Vocalização Animal/classificação
2.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 135(3): 1624-31, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24606297

RESUMO

Whistles of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and Atlantic spotted dolphins (Stenella frontalis) in the eastern Gulf of Mexico were recorded and measured with a calibrated towed hydrophone array. Surveys encountered groups of both bottlenose (N = 10) and spotted dolphins (N = 5). Analysis of those data produced 1695 bottlenose dolphin whistles and 1273 spotted dolphin whistles with a high signal-to-noise ratio. Whistle frequency metrics were lower in bottlenose than spotted dolphins, while whistle duration was longer in spotted dolphins, data that may help inform automatic classification algorithms. Source levels were estimated by determining the range and bearing of an individual dolphin from the array and then adding the predicted transmission loss to the calculated received level. The median bottlenose dolphin source level was 138 dB re 1µPa at 1 m with a range of 114-163 dB re 1µPa at 1 m. The median spotted dolphin source level was 138 dB re 1µPa at 1 m with a range of 115-163 dB re 1µPa at 1 m. These source level measurements, in conjunction with estimates of vocalization rates and transmission loss models, can be used to improve passive acoustically determined dolphin abundance estimates in the Gulf of Mexico.


Assuntos
Acústica , Golfinho Nariz-de-Garrafa/fisiologia , Stenella/fisiologia , Natação , Vocalização Animal , Acústica/instrumentação , Algoritmos , Animais , Golfinho Nariz-de-Garrafa/classificação , Golfinho Nariz-de-Garrafa/psicologia , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Golfo do México , Oceanos e Mares , Reconhecimento Automatizado de Padrão , Densidade Demográfica , Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador , Espectrografia do Som , Stenella/classificação , Stenella/psicologia , Transdutores , Vocalização Animal/classificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA