Long term clinical results of hallux varus correction by a reversed abductor hallucis transfer.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic hallux varus is a rare complication after hallux valgus surgery. Operative treatment comprises a wide variety of techniques, of which the reversed transfer of the abductor hallucis tendon is the most recent described technique. METHODS: This paper will present the long-term clinical results of the reversed transfer of the abductor hallucis longus. Therefore, we performed a prospective clinical observational study on 16 female patients. Our hypothesis is that the tendon transfer will persist in a good alignment and patient satisfaction on long term. There is a 100% follow-up rate with a range from 10 to 101 months. Patients were subjected to a clinical examination, three questionnaires and their general satisfaction. RESULTS: Out of 16 patients, at time of follow-up, we found a positive correlation between the subjective outcome score and alignment (r=0.59), and between the general satisfaction and alignment (r=0.77). Based on the general satisfaction we achieved a success satisfaction rate of 69% (11 patients). The other 31% (5 patients) patient group was only satisfied with major reservations or not satisfied at all. The two most invalidating complications were a coronal or sagittal malalignment or the combination of both. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the reverse abductor hallucis tendon transfer is a good technique to treat a supple iatrogenic hallux varus with an observed success satisfaction rate of 69% at a mean follow-up time of 48 (range 10-101) months. However, patients should be informed that on the long-term loss of correction is possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective clinical observational study: Level IIb.

Does the subtalar joint compensate for ankle malalignment in end-stage ankle arthritis?

BACKGROUND: Patients with ankle arthritis often present with concomitant hindfoot deformity, which may involve the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. However, the possible compensatory mechanisms of these two mechanically linked joints are not well known. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this study we sought to (1) compare ankle and hindfoot alignment of our study cohort with end-stage ankle arthritis with that of a control group; (2) explore the frequency of compensated malalignment between the tibiotalar and subtalar joints in our study cohort; and (3) assess the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of classification methods of hindfoot alignment used in this study. METHODS: Between March 2006 and September 2013, we performed 419 ankle arthrodesis and ankle replacements (380 patients). In this study, we evaluated radiographs for 233 (56%) ankles (226 patients) which met the following inclusion criteria: (1) no prior subtalar arthrodesis; (2) no previously failed total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis; (3) with complete conventional radiographs (all three ankle views were required: mortise, lateral, and hindfoot alignment view). Ankle and hindfoot alignment was assessed by measurement of the medial distal tibial angle, tibial talar surface angle, talar tilting angle, tibiocalcaneal axis angle, and moment arm of calcaneus. The obtained values were compared with those observed in the control group of 60 ankles from 60 people. Only those without obvious degenerative changes of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints and without previous surgeries of the ankle or hindfoot were included in the control group. Demographic data for the patients with arthritis and the control group were comparable (sex, p=0.321; age, p=0.087). The frequency of compensated malalignment between the tibiotalar and subtalar joints, defined as tibiocalcaneal angle or moment arm of the calcaneus being greater or smaller than the same 95% CI statistical cutoffs from the control group, was tallied. All ankle radiographs were independently measured by two observers to determine the interobserver reliability. One of the observers evaluated all images twice to determine the intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: There were differences in medial distal tibial surface angle (86.6°±7.3° [95% CI, 66.3°-123.7°) versus 89.1°±2.9° [95% CI, 83.0°-96.3°], p<0.001), tibiotalar surface angle (84.9°±14.4° [95% CI, 45.3°-122.7°] versus 89.1°±2.9° [95% CI, 83.0°-96.3°], p<0.001), talar tilting angle (-1.7°±12.5° [95% CI, -41.3°-30.3°) versus 0.0°±0.0° [95% CI, 0.0°-0.0°], p=0.003), and tibiocalcaneal axis angle (-7.2°±13.1° [95% CI, -57°-33°) versus -2.7°±5.2° [95% CI, -13.3°-9.0°], p<0.001) between patients with ankle arthritis and the control group. Using the classification system based on the tibiocalcaneal angle, there were 62 (53%) and 22 (39%) compensated ankles in the varus and valgus groups, respectively. Using the classification system based on the moment arm of the calcaneus, there were 68 (58%) and 20 (35%) compensated ankles in the varus and valgus groups, respectively. For all conditions or methods of measurement, patients with no or mild degenerative change of the subtalar joint have a greater likelihood of compensating coronal plane deformity of the ankle with arthritis (p<0.001-p=0.032). The interobserver and intraobserver reliability for all radiographic measurements was good to excellent (the correlation coefficients range from 0.820 to 0.943). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial ankle malalignment, mostly varus deformity, is common in ankles with end-stage osteoarthritis. The subtalar joint often compensates for the malaligned ankle in static weightbearing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Iatrogenic hallux varus treatment algorithm.

Iatrogenic hallux varus is a relatively rare complication of corrective hallux valgus surgery that has multiple pathologic facets. It requires a comprehensive assessment that focuses on joint flexibility, joint integrity, soft tissue balance, and bony deformity. A step-wise treatment approach is used to address all elements of the deformity. The literature on hallux varus treatments consists mainly of retrospective case series, with several proposed procedures addressing various degrees of deformity. Comparison of these procedures is a challenging endeavor and each case should be considered on an individual basis.

The influence of forefoot varus on eccentric hip torque in adolescents.

Hip strength impairments have been established as risk factors for lower limb injuries. Hip muscles strength might be influenced by foot misalignments, however this has not yet been verified. Forefoot varus (FV) has been shown to cause subtalar joint hyperpronation. Subtalar hyperpronation has been associated with excessive lower limb internal rotation in weight-bearing activities. Also, subtalar hyperpronation might result in greater ground reaction force dissipation at the foot. Consequently, there would be less demand for force dissipation at the hip joint, which could reduce the capacity for hip eccentric torque in these subjects. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if FV influences the eccentric hip torque generation of young subjects. Forty-four sedentary, healthy adolescents were divided into 2 groups: subjects with FV (VG, n = 22) and subjects with neutral forefoot alignment (CG, n = 22). An isokinetic dynamometer was used to assess the eccentric torque generated in hip extension and external rotation in these subjects. Group differences were assessed using a one-way multivariate analysis of variance. The VG presented smaller eccentric torque for hip extension (P = 0.014) when compared to the CG, with no difference between groups in external rotation torque (P = 0.433). These results indicate that FV influences hip eccentric torque generation of young subjects. Considering that the muscles involved in hip extension are related to the stabilization of the lumbar spine, hip and knee, these findings bring further enlightenment to the role of foot misalignments as risk factors for injuries in the lower limbs and lumbo-pelvic complex in young subjects.

Asymmetry of the leg alignment affects trunk bending in the coronal plane after unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would produce asymmetric changes of lower extremity in patients with bilateral varus deformity. Our purpose was to investigate whether asymmetry of the leg alignment would affect trunk bending in the coronal plane after unilateral TKA. Twenty patients (mean 76 years old) with bilateral end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) participated. Spine images during relaxed standing were obtained on pre- and postoperative day 21. As a result, the shoulder tilted more to the TKA side and the pelvis inclined more to the contralateral OA side. These results suggested that the trunk would bend away from the contralateral OA side after unilateral TKA in patients with bilateral end-stage knee OA and varus deformity. Asymmetry of the leg alignment led to asymmetric trunk bending.

Lateral soft tissue laxity increases but medial laxity does not contract with varus deformity in total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In TKA, soft tissue balance (the joint gap) depends on the amount of resected bone and soft tissue release. Some studies report preoperative bony deformity correlates with soft tissue balance evaluated intraoperatively and that the medial tissues are contracted with varus deformity. However, these studies did not take into account the amount of resected bone and did not describe whether the soft tissue was tight or loose. Therefore, it remains unclear whether in varus deformity the soft tissues on the medial side are contracted. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared (1) intraoperative joint gap, (2) amount of resected bone, and (3) intraoperative soft tissue laxity on the lateral and medial sides according to severity of preoperative varus deformity. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 70 patients with osteoarthritis and varus deformities who underwent 90 TKAs. We retrospectively divided the 90 knees into three groups according to degree of preoperative alignment: mild varus group (<10°), moderate varus group (10°-20°), and severe varus group (>20°). To evaluate intraoperative soft tissue tension, we calculated the soft tissue gap by subtracting the thickness of the resected bone from the joint gaps on the medial and lateral sides, respectively. We then explored the relationship between the soft tissue gap and preoperative alignment. RESULTS: The lateral soft tissue gap was larger in the severe varus group than in the mild and moderate varus groups. The medial soft tissue gap was larger in the severe varus group than in the mild varus group, but there were no differences in the medial joint gaps among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: After the bone is resected, the soft tissue on the lateral side is more lax; however, the soft tissue on the medial side is not shorter with greater preoperative varus deformity.

Anatomy of the varus foot and ankle.

In summary, varus deformity of the foot and ankle encompasses a spectrum of deformities from mild to severe. The cause of this deformity may be bone, muscle imbalance, or a combination of both. Surgical intervention should be planned only after the patient's anatomy is understood. Uncorrected symptomatic varus deformities may have significant consequences on gait kinematics and foot biomechanics.

Patomecánica del retropié varo. Caso clínico / Varus rarefoot pathomechanics. Clinical case

En este trabajo se presenta la resolución de un caso clínico, paciente que acudió a nuestra consulta por presentar dolor a nivel de la 23 cabeza metatarsal del pie izquierdo. Diagnosticarnos al paciente de retropié varo parcialmente compensado y se elaboró un tratamiento ortopodológico para compensar dicha patología, así como solucionar el motivo de consulta. Esto nos llevó a realizar una revisión bibliográfica sobre dicha patología, etiología, diagnostico, repercusiones clínicas y tratamiento ortopodológico (AU)

This article presents the resolution of a clinical case, about a patient who came to our Centre because of pain at 2ª head metatarsal on the left foot. Our diagnose was rearfoot varus partially compensated and was elaborated an orthotic therapy to compensate the above mentioned pathology, as well as to solve the problem. This led us to realize a bibliographical review of that pathology, etiology, diagnosis, clinical repercussions and orthotic therapy (AU)

The combined reverse scarf and opening wedge osteotomy of the proximal phalanx for the treatment of iatrogenic hallux varus.

BACKGROUND: [Corrected] Hallux varus is a complication of hallux valgus surgery. Historically the standard treatment has been to arthrodese the first metatarso-phalangeal (MTP) joint. More recently other options have come to light, including reverse osteotomies and tendon-transfer procedures. OBJECTIVES: This paper presents a small retrospective audit of patients who developed hallux varus following the combined rotation scarf and Akin osteotomy for hallux valgus, and their subsequent treatment with a stepwise approach of soft tissue release and ultimately reverse scarf osteotomy and opening wedge osteotomy of the proximal phalanx. METHOD: Five patients attended for a retrospective audit including reasons for revision surgery, review of intermetatarsal (IM) and first metatarso-phalangeal joint (MTPA) angles, AOFAS scores and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 38 months, mean IM angle and MTP joint angle improved from 5 to 9° and -10° to 11° respectively. Mean first MTP joint dorsiflexion and plantarflexion was 26° and 19° respectively. One patient was completely satisfied and four were satisfied with reservations with their surgical outcome and 100% felt they were better off as a result of their surgery. CONCLUSION: The stepwise approach to the reverse scarf and opening wedge osteotomy of the proximal phalanx for iatrogenic hallux varus is an alternative to first MTP joint arthrodesis for those with a viable joint.

Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: Although knee malalignment is assumed to correlate with knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is still unknown whether malalignment precedes the development of OA or whether it is a result of OA. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between malalignment and the development of knee OA as well as progression of knee OA. METHODS: A total of 1,501 participants in the Rotterdam study were randomly selected. Knee OA at baseline and at followup (mean followup 6.6 years) was scored according to the Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading system. Alignment was measured by the femorotibial angle on radiographs at baseline. Multivariable logistic regression for repeated measurements was used to analyze the association of malalignment with the development and progression of OA. RESULTS: Of 2,664 knees, 1,012 (38%) were considered to have normal alignment, 693 (26%) had varus alignment, and 959 (36%) had valgus alignment. A comparison of valgus alignment and normal alignment showed that valgus alignment was associated with a borderline significant increase in development of knee OA (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.97-2.44), and varus alignment was associated with a 2-fold increased risk (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.28-3.32). Stratification for body mass index showed that this increased risk was especially seen in overweight and obese individuals but not in non-overweight persons. The risk of OA progression was also significantly increased in the group with varus alignment compared with the group with normal alignment (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.07-7.88). CONCLUSION: An increasing degree of varus alignment is associated not only with progression of knee OA but also with development of knee OA. However, this association seems particularly applicable to overweight and obese persons.

Knee alignment does not predict incident osteoarthritis: the Framingham osteoarthritis study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship of knee malalignment to the occurrence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) among subjects without radiographic OA at baseline to determine whether malalignment is a risk factor for incident disease or simply a marker of increasing disease severity. METHODS: We selected 110 incident tibiofemoral (TF) OA case knees (76 subjects) and 356 random control knees (178 subjects) from among participants in the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Case knees did not have OA at baseline (1992-1994 examination) but had developed OA (Kellgren/Lawrence grade>or=2) at followup (2002-2005 examination) (mean of 8.75 years between examinations). Control knees did not have OA at baseline. Standardized digital radiographs of the fully extended knee with weight-bearing were read using a standard protocol and eFilm viewing software. We measured the anatomic axis, the condylar angle, the tibial plateau angle, and the condylar tibial plateau angle. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.93 to 0.96 and the intraobserver ICC from 0.94 to 0.97. In a knee-specific analysis, we examined the relationship of each alignment measurement to the risk of TF OA using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). We used the same approach to assess the association between each alignment measurement and the risk of medial TF OA. RESULTS: Subjects in the case population were older and had a higher BMI than the controls. The alignment values were normally distributed and were not different between the cases and the controls. After adjustment for age, sex and BMI, there was no significant increase in incident OA in the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile category for any of the alignment measures (P for trend for anatomic axis and condylar tibial plateau angle was 0.83 and 0.80, respectively). Similar results were also observed for medial compartment OA. CONCLUSION: We found that baseline knee alignment is not associated with either incident radiographic TF OA or medial TF OA. These results suggest that malalignment is not a risk factor for OA, but rather is a marker of disease severity and/or its progression.

Application of bone graft to the medial side of the first metatarsal head in the treatment of hallux varus.

BACKGROUND: Hallux varus deformity is not frequent, is usually acquired, and is poorly tolerated by patients. A common cause is the resection of an excessive amount of the head of the first metatarsal during an operation performed to correct a hallux valgus deformity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of application of bone graft to the medial aspect of the first metatarsal head in order to restore missing bone after resection of an excessive amount of bone during a bunionectomy. METHODS: Of thirty patients who had a hallux varus deformity that was treated operatively, eight (ten feet) had bone-grafting to the medial aspect of the first metatarsal head. Six patients (seven feet) were available for evaluation at an average of 8.6 years (range, two to twenty-two years) postoperatively. The original reasons for the consultation for the hallux varus deformity were pain in the great toe, discomfort with shoewear, and the cosmetic appearance of the deformity. The pain typically was located on the medial aspect of the great toe and was caused by the pressure of the shoe; the pain usually was aggravated by walking. Preoperatively, the passive range of dorsiflexion averaged 72 degrees (range, 60 to 80 degrees); the passive range of plantar flexion, 12 degrees (range, 10 to 20 degrees); and the varus deformity, 18 degrees. RESULTS: Six of the seven feet had a satisfactory result. The pain associated with the varus deformity had disappeared in all patients. One patient was dissatisfied because of 20 degrees of valgus angulation. The passive range of dorsiflexion averaged 63 degrees (range, 60 to 70 degrees), and all patients had 10 degrees of plantar flexion. Overall, the valgus angulation of the metatarsophalangeal joint averaged 19 degrees (range, 16 to 22 degrees). There was no recurrence or persistence of the varus deformity. In three feet, the joint space was reduced, but this did not jeopardize the clinical result. CONCLUSIONS: A bone graft screwed onto the medial aspect of the metatarsal head provided a good result. This technique is indicated when the varus deformity is related to a previous resection of an excessive amount of bone during a bunionectomy and when the deformity is passively reducible to neutral.