Cost of upper tract imaging obtained during hematuria evaluation: Analysis of a national claims database.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the actual cost of hematuria evaluation using nationally representative claims data, given that the workup for hematuria burdens the healthcare system with significant associated costs. We hypothesized that evaluation with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) confers more cost to hematuria evaluation than renal ultrasound (US). METHODS: Using a national, privately insured database (MarketScan), we identified all individuals with an incident diagnosis of hematuria. We included patients who underwent cystoscopy and upper tract imaging within 3 months of diagnosis. We tabulated the costs of the imaging study as well as the total healthcare cost per patient. A multivariable model was developed to evaluate patient factors associated with total healthcare costs. RESULTS: We identified 318,680 patients with hematuria who underwent evaluation. Median costs associated with upper tract imaging were $362 overall, $504 for CT with contrast, $163 for US, $680 for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), $283 for CT without contrast, and $294 for retrograde pyelogram. Median cystoscopy cost was $283. Total healthcare costs per patient were highest when utilizing MRI and CT imaging. When adjusted for comorbidities, the use of any imaging other than ultrasound was associated with higher costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative analysis, hematuria evaluation confers a significant cost burden, while the primary factor associated with higher costs of screening was imaging type. Based upon reduced cost of US-based strategies, further investigation should delineate its cost-effectiveness in the diagnosis of urological disease.

Use of a Risk Stratification Tool to Guide Evaluation of Patients With Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if use of the hematuria risk index can reduce testing and cost, while maintaining equivalent lesion detection in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 1049 patients at single institution. Hematuria risk index score was calculated based on clinical factors including age, sex, smoking history, and degree of hematuria for each patient along with evaluation studies performed and total number of tumors discovered. Cost benefit analysis was performed based on published Medicare averages. RESULTS: Tumor detection rate in overall, low-risk, and moderate-risk groups were 1.2%, 0%, and 2.96% at a total cost of $408,376. When low-risk group is not screened cost decreases to $166,252 with no lesions missed. The cost to discover one lesion/cancer in the overall group was $34,031.3, the cost to find one high-grade clinically significant lesion/cancer was $136,125.3 for the overall group. When the low-risk group was removed, the cost to find a high-grade clinically significant lesion/cancer decreased to $55,417.3 without missing any significant lesions. Ultrasound may be utilized instead of computed tomography with minimal loss of lesion detection in select moderate risk patients. CONCLUSION: None of the low-risk hematuria risk patients were diagnosed with any lesions, as such these patients may not need an evaluation. Furthermore, by utilizing a risk-stratified approach to the assessment of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria health care costs can be significantly decreased with limited negative consequences in terms of lesion detection.

Comparative Cost Analysis: Teleurology vs Conventional Face-to-Face Clinics.

OBJECTIVE: To compare costs associated with teleurology vs face-to-face clinic visits for initial outpatient hematuria evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis included 3 cost domains: transportation, clinic operations, and patient time. Transportation cost was based on standard government travel reimbursement. Clinic staff cost was based on hourly salary plus fringe benefits. For a face-to-face clinic encounter, patient time included time spent for travel, parking, walking to and from clinic, checking in and checking out, nursing evaluation, urologic evaluation, laboratory, and waiting. Patient time cost was based on the Federal minimum wage. Provider and laboratory times were excluded from the cost analysis as these were similar for both encounters. RESULTS: We included 400 hematuria evaluations: 300 teleurology and 100 face-to-face. Both groups had similar median age (63 vs 64 years, P = .48) and median travel distance/time (58 vs 54 miles, P = .19; 94 vs 82 minutes, P = .09, respectively). Average patient time was greater for face-to-face encounters (266 vs 70 minutes teleurology, P < .001). Transportation was the primary driver of overall costs ($83.47 per encounter), followed by patient time ($32.87/encounter) and clinic staff cost ($18.68/encounter). The average cost per encounter was $135.02 for face-to-face clinic vs $10.95 for teleurology (P < .001) exclusive of provider and laboratory times. Cost savings associated with each telehematuria encounter totaled $124.07. CONCLUSION: Teleurology offers considerable cost savings of $124 per encounter for the initial evaluation of hematuria compared to face-to-face clinic. With 1.5 million annual hematuria encounters nationally, implementation of teleurology for hematuria evaluation offers cost savings approaching $200 million per year.

Cost-effectiveness of Common Diagnostic Approaches for Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria.

Importance: Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria (AMH) is highly prevalent and may signal occult genitourinary (GU) malignant abnormality. Common diagnostic approaches differ in their costs and effectiveness in detecting cancer. Given the low prevalence of GU malignant abnormality among patients with AMH, it is important to quantify the cost implications of detecting cancer for each approach. Objective: To estimate the effectiveness, costs, and incremental cost per cancer detected (ICCD) for 4 common diagnostic approaches evaluating AMH. Design, Setting, and Participants: A decision-analytic model-based cost-effectiveness analysis using inputs from the medical literature. PubMed searches were performed to identify relevant literature for all key model inputs, each of which was derived from the clinical study with the most robust data and greatest applicability. Analysis included adult patients with AMH on routine urinalysis with subgroups of high-risk patients (males, smokers, age ≥50 years) seen in the primary care or urologic referral setting. Interventions: Four diagnostic approaches were evaluated relative to the reference case of no evaluation: (1) computed tomography (CT) alone; (2) cystoscopy alone; (3) CT and cystoscopy combined; and (4) renal ultrasound and cystoscopy combined. Main Outcomes and Measures: At termination of the diagnostic period, cancers detected, costs (payer perspective), and ICCD per 10 000 patients evaluated for AMH. Results: Of the 4 diagnostic approaches analyzed, CT alone was dominated by all other strategies, detecting 221 cancers at a cost of $9 300 000. Ultrasound and cystoscopy detected 245 cancers and was most cost-effective with an ICCD of $53 810. Replacing ultrasound with CT detected just 1 additional cancer at an ICCD of $6 480 484. Ultrasound and cystoscopy remained the most cost-effective approach in subgroup analysis. The model was not sensitive to any inputs within the proposed ranges. Using probabilistic sensitivity analysis, ultrasound and cystoscopy was the dominant strategy in 100% of simulations. Conclusions and Relevance: The combination of renal ultrasound and cystoscopy is the most cost-effective among 4 diagnostic approaches for the initial evaluation of AMH. The use of ultrasound in lieu of CT as the first-line diagnostic strategy will optimize cancer detection and reduce costs associated with evaluation of AMH. Given our findings, we need to critically evaluate the appropriateness of our current clinical practices, and potentially alter our guidelines to reflect the most effective screening strategies for patients with AMH.

Healthcare resource consumption for intermittent urinary catheterisation: cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic catheters and budget impact analyses.

OBJECTIVES: This study presents a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated catheters for patients performing urinary intermittent catheterisation. A national budget impact analysis is also included to evaluate the impact of intermittent catheterisation for management of bladder dysfunctions over a period of 5 years. DESIGN: A Markov model (lifetime horizon, 1 year cycle length) was developed to project health outcomes (life years and quality-adjusted life years) and economic consequences related to patients using hydrophilic coated or uncoated catheters. The model was populated with catheter-related clinical efficacy data retrieved from randomised controlled trials and quality-of-life data (utility weights) from the literature. Cost data (EUR, 2015) were estimated on the basis of healthcare resource consumption derived from an e-survey addressed to key opinion leaders in the field. SETTING: Italian Healthcare Service perspective. POPULATION: Patients with spinal cord injury performing intermittent urinary catheterisation in the home setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios (ICER and ICUR) of hydrophilic coated versus uncoated catheters and associated healthcare budget impact. RESULTS: The base-case ICER and ICUR associated with hydrophilic coated catheters were €20 761 and €24 405, respectively. This implies that hydrophilic coated catheters are likely to be cost-effective in comparison to uncoated ones, as proposed Italian threshold values range between €25 000 and €66 400. Considering a market share at year 5 of 89% hydrophilic catheters and 11% uncoated catheters, the additional cost for Italy is approximately €12 million in the next 5 years (current market share scenario for year 0: 80% hydrophilic catheters and 20% uncoated catheters). CONCLUSIONS: Considered over a lifetime, hydrophilic coated catheters are potentially a cost-effective choice in comparison to uncoated ones. These findings can assist policymakers in evaluating intermittent catheterisation in patients with spinal cord injury.

Fast-track access to urologic care for patients with macroscopic haematuria is efficient and cost-effective: results from a prospective intervention study.

BACKGROUND: The delay between onset of macroscopic haematuria and diagnosis of bladder cancer is often long. METHODS: We evaluated timely diagnosis and health-care costs for patients with macroscopic haematuria given fast-track access to diagnostics. During a 15-month period, a telephone hotline for fast-track diagnostics was provided in nine Swedish municipalities for patients aged ⩾50 years with macroscopic haematuria. The control group comprised 101 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer in the same catchment area with macroscopic haematuria who underwent regular diagnostic process. RESULTS: In all 275 patients who called 'the Red Phone' hotline were investigated, and 47 of them (17%) were diagnosed with cancer and 36 of those had bladder cancer. Median time from patient-reported haematuria to diagnosis was 29 (interquartile range (IQR) 14-104) days and 50 (IQR 27-165) days in the intervention and the control group, respectively (P=0.03). The median health-care costs were lower in the intervention group (655 (IQR 655-655) EUR) than in the control group (767 (IQR 490-1096) EUR) (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Direct access to urologic expertise and fast-track diagnostics is motivated for patients with macroscopic haematuria to reduce diagnostic intervals and lower health-care expenditures.

Assessing the Costs of Extraurinary Findings of Computed Tomography Urogram in the Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the costs associated with incidental extraurinary findings on computed tomography urogram (CTU) in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify all CTUs performed for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria at our institution from 2012 to 2014. All genitourinary (GU) and incidental extraurinary findings were documented. Further clinical follow-up to May 2015 was reviewed to determine if any referrals, tests, imaging, and/or procedures were ordered based on the initial CTU. Cost estimates were determined using the Medicare physician reimbursement rate. RESULTS: Two hundred two patients were evaluated with CTU for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. GU malignancy was documented in 2 patients (0.99%), both renal masses suspicious for renal cell carcinoma. Sixty patients were found to have kidney stones, of which 26 had stones ≥5 mm. Incidental extraurinary findings were found in 150 (74.3%) patients, requiring further imaging costs of $17,242 or $85.35 per patient screened. Twelve patients required a total of 20 procedures for a cost of $54,655. The total cost related to extraurinary findings was $140,290 or $694.50 per initial patient screened. CONCLUSION: The incidental extraurinary findings detected on CTU can lead to expensive and invasive testing and treatment. Whereas costs associated with further workup were high, the overall outcomes in both GU and non-GU cancer diagnosis were low. Future analysis should focus on limiting the cost and invasiveness of our evaluation for this condition.

Extraurinary Incidental Findings on CT for Hematuria: The Radiologist's Role and Downstream Cost Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study of patients who underwent CT for hematuria were to understand how radiologists' recommendations regarding incidental findings affect their management, assess long-term outcomes from important incidental findings, and calculate estimates of downstream costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 1295 patients who underwent CT for hematuria from 2004 to 2006 at our institution. Incidental findings outside the urinary tract were recorded and imaging reports categorized on the basis of recommendations, interpretations, and actions of radiologists. Patients with important incidental findings were followed for 6-8 years. Costs related to incidental findings were estimated and tallied. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen important findings were found in 143 of 1295 patients, with 93 patients undergoing clinical follow-up, including 30 patients who underwent invasive procedures leading to 154 hospital days and 16 operations (group 1). In 63 patients, no invasive procedures were performed (group 2). Costs were higher in group 1 than in group 2, and the average per-patient cost for all 1295 patients was $385. In group 1, 95% of recommendations were followed compared with 80% in group 2. There was probable therapeutic benefit in 25 of 143 (17%) patients. There were serious complications in six of 143 (4.2%) patients, including death in two of 143 (1.4%). CONCLUSION: Radiologists' recommendations were generally followed for important incidental findings. These recommendations can direct the most cost-efficient and effective care for incidental findings. Although some patients with incidental findings had probable benefit, others incurred morbidity or mortality. A small number of invasive procedures resulted in substantial costs in this symptomatic population. Costs averaged over the entire population were higher than have been previously reported.

In search of a consensus: evaluation of the patient with hematuria in an era of cost containment.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to describe the current consensus guidelines for nonimaging triage and ultimate preferred imaging approach for the patient with unexplained hematuria. CONCLUSION: Numerous consensus guidelines from varying societies have outlined preferred imaging pathways for the patient with unexplained urologic causes of hematuria. Future guidelines will need to take into account disease prevalence, radiation considerations, and cost.

The economic implications of unsuspected findings from CT urography performed for haematuria.

OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the prevalence of unsuspected findings from CT urography (CTU) performed for haematuria and to evaluate the economic implications associated with the subsequent management of these findings. METHODS: We analysed the results of 778 consecutive CTU scans performed in a haematuria clinic between 2008 and 2010. We excluded cases where diagnosis of an abnormality had been made prior to CTU. Costs incurred during the follow-up of unsuspected findings were calculated following guidance set out in the NHS Costing Manual 2009/10. RESULTS: 778 CTU scans were performed for patients attending a haematuria clinic from 2008 to 2010. 455 men and 323 women underwent CTU scan; they had a median age of 62 years. 56% of scans were found to have unexpected extra-urinary findings (587 abnormalities in 439 scans). Common findings included diverticular disease (138, 17.7%), adrenal masses [85, 10.9%; 40 (5.1%) of which were indeterminate], lung abnormalities (67, 8.6%), gall bladders containing calculi (44, 5.7%), adnexal cysts (25, 7.7% of women) and aortic aneurysms (18, 2.3%). These findings led to a total of 136 outpatient appointments, 88 radiological investigations and 11 procedures (4 of which were major). The overall cost incurred was £47,366, or £60 per patient. CONCLUSION: CTU is associated with a high rate of unsuspected findings. There is an economic implication to performing CT scanning in this setting, in which further unanticipated investigation and treatment cost is approximately £60 per patient.

Is routine urine cytology useful in the haematuria clinic?

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine the value of routine urine cytology in the initial evaluation of patients presenting to a one-stop haematuria clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1000 consecutive patients who attended the haematuria clinic between June 2003 and November 2004 were studied prospectively. A standard protocol was used to investigate these patients. This included urine cytology, upper tract imaging and flexible cystoscopy. RESULTS: Overall, 986 samples of urine were sent for cytology. In 126 patients, the report was abnormal; of these, 71 patients were found to have bladder transitional cell carcinoma by flexible cystoscopy and a further 3 had upper tract transitional cell carcinoma diagnosed radiologically. The remaining 52 patients with abnormal cytology were not found to have cancer on further investigations. The total cost for urine cytology and additional investigations was pound50,535. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of the initial evaluation of patients with haematuria, no case of urothelial malignancy was diagnosed on the basis of urine cytology alone. Therefore, urine cytology need not be used routinely in the initial diagnostic work-up for haematuria.

Cluster randomized trial of a guideline-based open access urological investigation service.

BACKGROUND: Out-patient services are trying to achieve effective and efficient health care in overcrowded, busy clinic settings. "One stop" and "open access" clinics have been advocated as a way of improving out-patient services. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of a guideline-based open access urological investigation service. METHODS: General practices were randomized to receive either referral guidelines and access to the investigation service for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or referral guidelines and access to the investigation service for microscopic haematuria (MH). The study population comprised 66 general practices in the Grampian region of Scotland referring 959 patients. The outcome measures were compliance with guidelines (number of recommended investigations completed), number of general practice consultations, the number and case mix of referrals, waiting time to initial hospital appointment, and the number of patients with a management decision reached at initial appointment and discharged by 12 months after referral. RESULTS: GPs' compliance with referral guidelines increased (difference in means 0.5; 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.8, P < 0.001). Approximately 50% of eligible patients were referred through the new system. The number and case mix of referrals were similar. The intervention reduced the waiting time from referral to initial out-patient appointment (ratio of means 0.7; 0.5-0.9, patients with LUTS only) and increased the number of patients who had a management decision reached at initial appointment (odds ratio 5.8; 2.9-11.5, P < 0.00001, both conditions). Patients were more likely to be discharged within 12 months (odds ratio 1.7; 0.9-3.3, P = 0.11). There were no significant changes detected in patient outcomes. Overall the new service was probably cost saving to the NHS. CONCLUSIONS: The guideline-based open access investigation service streamlined the process of out-patient referral, resulting in a more efficient service with reduced out-patient waiting times, fewer out-patient and investigation appointments and release of specialist and clinic time.

Prospective comparison of computerized tomography and excretory urography in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria.

PURPOSE: The ideal imaging study for evaluation of the upper urinary tract in patients with microhematuria has been debated. We prospectively compared the diagnostic yield of computerized tomography (CT) to excretory urography (IVP) in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 1998 and June 2001, 115 patients presenting with asymptomatic microhematuria underwent CT and IVP before cystoscopy. Helical CT images with 5 mm. adrenal and kidney slices with and without contrast material were followed by delayed 5 mm. ureteral contrast images through the bladder base. Each CT and IVP was examined by a radiologist who was blinded to the result of the other imaging study. Diagnostic yields of the imaging techniques were compared using the test of 2 proportions and chi-square analysis. RESULTS: Radiographic abnormalities were noted on CT or IVP in 38 patients. Sensitivity was 100% for CT and 60.5% for IVP, and specificity 97.4% for CT and 90.9% for IVP. CT accuracy was 98.3% compared to IVP accuracy which was 80.9% (p <0.001). A total of 40 nonurological diagnoses were made by CT, including 3 abdominal aortic aneurysms and 1 iliac artery aneurysm. No additional diagnoses were made by IVP. Fewer additional radiographic studies were recommended after CT than after IVP. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CT in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria results in better diagnostic yield. In addition, more nonurological diagnoses can be made and less additional radiography is needed to confirm a diagnosis.

A new automated system for urine analysis: a simple, cost-effective and reliable method for distinguishing between glomerular and nonglomerular sources of haematuria.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability, reliability and accuracy of a new automated system of urine analysis in differentiating glomerular from nonglomerular bleeding in the initial investigation of haematuria, and compare its efficacy with conventional phase-contrast microscopy (PCM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and six urine samples from patients in whom the final diagnosis was available were analysed using electrical flow impedance to detect, enumerate and size red blood cells in a conductive fluid (the cellfacts analyser, Microbial Systems Ltd, Coventry, UK). All the samples were also tested using a dipstick method and PCM was carried out for comparison on 45 of the 106 urine specimens. The results of cellfacts analysis were correlated with the final diagnoses to assess sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of this method; the costs were also analysed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine urine samples tested positive for blood on dipstick urine analysis and all these were confirmed to have red blood cells on cellfacts analysis. The remaining 37 samples were negative for blood on dipstick testing and cellfacts analysis, although seven patients had been referred with previously detected microscopic haematuria, none of whom were found to have any detectable pathology in the urinary tract on clinical examination and investigations. The remaining 30 patients were diagnosed to have urological or nephrological conditions with no haematuria. In the positive group, 20 (29%) patients were from the glomerular group, with a mean (range) red blood cell size of 4.25 (4-5.1) micrometer, and 49 (71%) from the nonglomerular group, with red blood cells of 5.47 (4.67-5.70) micrometer. These ranges overlapped at 4.67-5.1 micrometer at the decision threshold of 4.75 micrometer, the distribution of dysmorphic and eumorphic red blood cells for the glomerular group was 18 (90%) and two (10%), respectively, and for the nonglomerular group was 2 (4%) and 47 (96%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 90%, 96%, 90% and 96%, respectively. Consumable and labour costs were very low. CONCLUSIONS: Cellfacts analysis is a simple, rapid, objective and cost-effective method for differentiating glomerular from nonglomerular urinary red blood cells, especially when few such cells are present.

Hemorrhagic cystitis in bone marrow transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation are at risk for hemorrhagic cystitis despite appropriate preventive measures. This complication could have an impact on patient survival and other outcome variables. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients subjected to bone marrow transplantation was conducted to determine risk factors for hemorrhagic cystitis and evaluate the impact of hemorrhagic cystitis on certain outcome variables. Patients who experienced hemorrhagic cystitis received various forms of therapy, at the discretion of the treating physician. RESULTS: Hemorrhagic cystitis occurred more frequently in younger patients and those undergoing allogeneic transplantation. The occurrence of hemorrhagic cystitis was associated with increased hospital costs, length of hospitalization, and mortality. Gender, race, type of malignancy, other pretransplantation comorbidity, and the occurrence of other peritransplantation complications were not associated with occurrence of hemorrhagic cystitis. CONCLUSIONS: Hemorrhagic cystitis is a significant complication of bone marrow transplantation, which influences economic and survival outcome. Since the number of bone marrow transplants being performed is increasing, urologists should be prepared to play an active role in treating patients who experience this complication.

Insurability for asymptomatic hematuria or proteinuria during childhood.

The objective of this survey was to describe life insurance underwriting practices concerning children with asymptomatic hematuria and proteinuria. A questionnaire was sent to 200 companies licensed to issue life insurance policies in the state of New York. The medical director of each company was asked to respond to the insurability of children with asymptomatic hematuria and proteinuria. Two case summaries were provided with the questionnaire. Of 97 companies, 66 would offer insurance to the patient with hematuria, although 38 (58%) would charge additional premiums. In response to the problem of proteinuria, 61 companies would offer life insurance, although 50 (82%) would require higher premium charges (P < 0.002 compared with hematuria). We conclude that children with asymptomatic hematuria and proteinuria can usually obtain life insurance, although often at higher cost. Invasive diagnostic tests are not necessary for insurers to offer insurance.